Journal articles on the topic 'Civil-military relations'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Civil-military relations.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Civil-military relations.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Beinin, Joel. "Civil-Military Relations." Journal of Palestine Studies 15, no. 3 (1986): 132–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2536756.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Cohen, Eliot A. "Civil-military relations." Orbis 41, no. 2 (March 1997): 177–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0030-4387(97)90061-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Feaver, Peter D. "CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS." Annual Review of Political Science 2, no. 1 (June 1999): 211–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.211.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Islam, Syed Sirajul. "Civil-Military Relations." American Journal of Islam and Society 17, no. 2 (July 1, 2000): 97–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v17i2.2064.

Full text
Abstract:
Some Western scholars have asserted that the high frequency of militarycoup d‘etats in Muslim countries is rooted in Islam. They claim thatcitizens of the Muslim world easily accept military rule because it doesnot run counter to the spirit of Islam. Is this true? Does Islam reallyallow military intervention into politics or coup d’etat? This articleargues that in some contemporary Muslim countries the coup d’etat ormilitary takeover has nothing to do with the basic spirit of Islam.Rather, in those countries, Western colonial rule laid the foundation forthe subsequent takeover of civilian power by the army. Islam does notallow succession to power through force or coup d‘etat. This articleclarifies the position of Islam on the question of civil-military relations.A systematic study on this issue has yet to be done, therefore, there isroom for controversy. In order to explain the civil-military relations inan Islamic polity, this paper first examines Western perspectives oncivil-military relations then highlights Islamic perspectives. Finally, itoffers a brief explanation of military intervention into the politics ofsome contemporary Muslim countries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Swartz, Laura V., and Dale R. Herspring. "Russian Civil-Military Relations." Political Science Quarterly 112, no. 4 (1997): 708. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657710.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Aydınlı, Ersel. "Civil-Military Relations Transformed." Journal of Democracy 23, no. 1 (2012): 100–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2012.0004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Allison, William, and Dale R. Herspring. "Russian Civil-Military Relations." Slavic and East European Journal 42, no. 1 (1998): 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/310081.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Roi, M. L., and Gregory Smolynec. "Canadian Civil-Military Relations." International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis 65, no. 3 (September 2010): 705–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002070201006500311.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lee, Dongmin. "Chinese Civil-Military Relations." Armed Forces & Society 32, no. 3 (April 2006): 437–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327x05279645.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Renz, Bettina. "Russian civil–military relations." European Security 18, no. 4 (December 2009): 503–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2010.493175.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Forster, Anthony. "New Civil-Military Relations and its Research Agendas." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 01, no. 2 (2002): 71–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/connections.01.2.06.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

YASHCHENKO, V. "Dialectics of civil-military relations." INFORMATION AND LAW, no. 3(38) (September 28, 2021): 184–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2021.3(38).243824.

Full text
Abstract:
The proposed article provides a critical analysis of approaches to understanding civil-military relations not only as a control factor, but also a broader social phenomenon. It was found that the latter serves as a kind of social integrative factor in the field of security and defense of Ukraine. The problem is covered through the prism of dialectical categories of content and form, essence and manifestations, general and separate, unity and difference of civil and military relations, etc. The author does not limit himself to stating the existing achievements in the formation of these relations, but raises the question of their further fruitful development in the legal system of Ukraine.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Guttieri, Karen. "Civil-military relations in peacebuilding." Sicherheit & Frieden 22, no. 2 (2004): 79–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0175-274x-2004-2-79.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Huntington, Samuel P. "I. Reforming Civil-Military Relations." Journal of Democracy 6, no. 4 (1995): 9–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0067.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Quandt, William B., and Yehuda Ben Meir. "Civil-Military Relations in Israel." Foreign Affairs 74, no. 6 (1995): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20047434.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Rosén, Frederik. "Third-Generation Civil—Military Relations." Security Dialogue 40, no. 6 (December 2009): 597–616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010609350633.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Shields, Patricia M. "Civil-Military Relations: Changing Frontiers." Public Administration Review 66, no. 6 (November 2006): 924–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00660.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Narli, Nilüfer. "Civil‐military relations in Turkey." Turkish Studies 1, no. 1 (March 2000): 107–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683840008721223.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Goldstein, Lyle. "Russian Civil-Military Relations (review)." SAIS Review 17, no. 2 (1997): 210–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sais.1997.0023.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Taylor, Brian D. "Robert Brannon:Russian Civil-Military RelationsThomas Gomart:Russian Civil-Military Relations: Putin's Legacy." Democracy and Security 5, no. 3 (November 30, 2009): 309–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17419160903181650.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Bruneau, Thomas C. "Putting the Military Back into Civil-Military Relations." Latin American Research Review 56, no. 1 (2021): 251–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.25222/larr.1456.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Rable, George C., and Paul D. Escott. "Military Necessity: Civil-Military Relations in the Confederacy." Journal of Southern History 73, no. 4 (November 1, 2007): 902. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27649597.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

McKinney, G. "Military Necessity: Civil-Military Relations in the Confederacy." Journal of American History 93, no. 4 (March 1, 2007): 1240–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25094656.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Johnson, M. Mae. "Civil‐military relations and military reform in Bulgaria." European Security 4, no. 3 (September 1995): 488–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09662839508407233.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Dall’Agnol, Darlei, and Gustavo Fornari Dall’Agnol. "MILITARY ETHICS: RETHINKING CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN BRAZIL." Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 64, no. 154 (April 2023): 123–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-512x2023n15406dd.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT This paper presents a solid normative approach in military ethics, which justifies the rule of law in a constitutional regime capable of fixing the proper role of the Armed Forces in Brazil. Deploying this ethical framework, it analyzes the relevant literature, especially authors who defend civilian supremacy for the good functioning of a democratic society. Afterwards, some models of civil-military relations are introduced to establish the parameters and indicators of proper democratic consolidation. These parameters are applied to recent events, revealing that Brazil is regressing in its civilian control over the military. Finally, some practical proposals for reversing this tendency are put forward in pursuit of a fully democratic regime in Brazil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Rasmussen, Maria Jose Moyano. "Book Review: Civil-Military Relations and Democracy, U.S. Civil-Military Relations: In Crisis or Transition?" Armed Forces & Society 25, no. 3 (April 1999): 535–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327x9902500313.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Akkas Ahamed, Md Sayedur Rahman, and Nur Hossain. "Evolution of Civil-Military Relations in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study in the Context of Developing Countries." Technium Social Sciences Journal 10 (July 28, 2020): 514–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v10i1.1324.

Full text
Abstract:
Although Civil-military relations have historically been recognized as a subject of study in the developed world, it has become a subject of study in the region since World War II due to military intervention in newly independent Third World countries. Although the country became independent on the basis of Civil-Military relations in the war of liberation of Bangladesh in 1971, the relations did not last long. Civil-Military relations have been the subject of renewed research in Bangladesh since the establishment of the military-backed government on 1/11, 2007. The study discusses the historical context of Civil-Military relations, the nature of Civil-Military relations in Bangladesh, various activities under military rule, and political leadership. The roles of the military in the formation of the country have been analyzed. The limitations of Bangladesh's Civil-Military relations have been discussed on the basis of the experiences gained through personal interviews of high-ranking Civil-Military members and general public. In this study has been described on the civil-military relations in the light of developing countries which have been under military rule for several decades during the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. Therefore in carrying out this study, the civil-military relations in other developing countries and Bangladesh have been analyzed to understand the comparative aspects of civil-military relations at both local and global level. In addition, guidelines have been given on what should be the military-civil relations in the Political System of Bangladesh.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Kümmel, Gerhard. "The Military and its Civilian Environment: Reflections on a Theory of Civil-Military Relations." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 01, no. 4 (2002): 63–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/connections.01.4.06.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Kukreja, Veena. "Civil-Military Relations in Developing Countries." India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 45, no. 2-3 (April 1989): 154–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097492848904500202.

Full text
Abstract:
Students of civil-military relations, particularly those in the developing countries, admit having to work on myopic assumptions, meagre data, sloppy conceptualization and inelegant explanations. The relative newness of this area of studies could be one reason for this. The study of civil-military relations in the narrow sense referring mainly to military coups and interventions, has attained importance after World War II. But the study of civil-military relations in the broader perspective of multiplicity of relationships between military men, institutions and interests, on the one hand, and diverse and often conflicting non-military organizations and political personages and interests on the other, has begun to draw academic interest only in the last two decades or so. In the twentieth century, the armed forces, being an universal and integral part of a nation's political system, no longer remain completely aloof from politics in any nation. If politics is concerned, in David Easton's celebrated words, with the authoritative allocation of values and power within a society, the military as a vital institution in the polity can hardly be wished out of participatory bounds, at least for legitimate influence as an institutional interest group with a stake in the political decision-making. The varying roles the military may play in politics range from minimal legitimate influence by means of recognized channels inherent in their position and responsibilities within the political system to the other extreme of total displacement of the civilian government in the forms of illegitimate overt military intervention in politics. This paper seeks to attempt an overview of the existing scholarship on civil-military relations; second, it examines civil-military relations in the world with special reference to major political systems of the world; third, it surveys the literature on civil-military relations in general, and finally, it attempts to develop a general, complex, and hopefully fruitful causal model for analyzing the dynamics of civil-military relations; exploring implications for future research on civil-military relations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Burk, James. "Recent Trends in Civil-Military Relations." Tocqueville Review 17, no. 1 (January 1996): 83–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ttr.17.1.83.

Full text
Abstract:
Students of civil military relations commonly assume that military power should do the bidding of and bc hcld accountablc to civil power. They do not believe a society — whether ancient or modem, Eastcm or Western, developed or developing — can bc a good society if military power rcigns above ail others. They do not deny the importance of military power. In this imperfect world, they accept that no good society can fail to providc for its defense, by use of force if necessary. Thcrc. of course, lies the problem that dcfincs what is esscntially a normative ficld of study: How should society bc organized to ensure that civil power rules over military power and yet rules in a way that pennits military power to rcmain effective?
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Jermalavicius, Tomas. "Civil-Military Relations in the Baltic States Introduction / Editor’s Note." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 01, no. 4 (2002): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/connections.01.4.01.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Sumerinli, Jasur. "Civil-Military Relations in Azerbaijan: The Challenges of Wartime Conditions." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 10, no. 1 (2010): 138–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/connections.10.1.07.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Lee, Carrie. "CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS AND POLITICAL MILITARY RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THREAT RESILIENCY." Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare 5, no. 3 (January 31, 2023): 110–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.21810/jicw.v5i3.5177.

Full text
Abstract:
On November 21, 2022, Dr. Carrie Lee, associate professor and Chair of the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College, presented on Civil-Military Relations and Political Military Relations in the Context of Threat Resiliency. The key points discussed included the importance of good civil-military relations, how they are critical in establishing resiliency, and some of the threats that require good civil-military relations. Received: 2022-12-05Revised: 2022-12-07
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Angstrom, Jan. "The changing norms of civil and military and civil-military relations theory." Small Wars & Insurgencies 24, no. 2 (May 2013): 224–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2013.778014.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Mark Ruhl, J. "Redefining Civil-Military Relations in Honduras." Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 38, no. 1 (1996): 33–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/166395.

Full text
Abstract:
During the last two decades, military rulers have been replaced by democratically elected civilian governments throughout Latin America. Nevertheless, scholars (Mainwaring et al., 1992:3,8) contend that nearly all contemporary Latin American polities remain unconsolidated democratic regimes principally because civilian control over the armed forces has not yet been established. Although the armed forces have returned to their barracks, they have retained considerable political and institutional autonomy. A number of scholars (Loveman, 1994; Agüero, 1992; and others) emphasize that most Latin American constitutions still recognize the military's right to intervene when the constitutional order is threatened. The armed forces are also generally granted broad jurisdiction over internal security, as well as the freedom to organize their institution without civilian interference. There is a considerable body of opinion which maintains that fears of military intervention continue to constrain the behavior of civilian politicians and social groups (Valenzuela, 1992; O'Donnell and Schmitter, 1986; Rouquié, 1986; and Rial, 1990).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Brooks, Risa A. "Integrating the Civil–Military Relations Subfield." Annual Review of Political Science 22, no. 1 (May 11, 2019): 379–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060518-025407.

Full text
Abstract:
The subfield of civil–military relations has experienced a remarkable revitalization in recent years, yielding a wealth of intriguing insights. Yet, despite these auspicious developments, research remains unnecessarily divided across multiple dimensions: along the subdisciplinary boundaries of comparative, international, and American politics; within these subdisciplines by independent and dependent variables; by regional focus; by regime type analyzed (democratic, democratizing versus authoritarian); and by scholars' emphasis on normative versus positive analysis. This article aims to bridge existing divides and reduce fragmentation. It proposes several pathways forward, including proposing innovations in deductive theorizing, developing new analytical frameworks, and synthesizing and adjudicating empirical findings. It also suggests ways of bridging to research beyond the study of civil–military relations, such as that on the global phenomenon of democratic backsliding, the efficacy of nonviolent strategies of political struggle, military effectiveness, and the causes and outcomes of interstate war.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

BEN-ELIEZER, URI. "Rethinking the Civil-Military Relations Paradigm." Comparative Political Studies 30, no. 3 (June 1997): 356–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414097030003004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Chopra, Surendra. "Civil-Military Relations in South Asia." India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 48, no. 3 (July 1992): 109–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097492849204800306.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Sorenson, David S. "Civil-Military Relations in North Africa." Middle East Policy 14, no. 4 (December 2007): 99–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2007.00327.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Saffu, Yaw. "Changing civil‐military relations in Fiji." Australian Journal of International Affairs 44, no. 2 (August 1990): 159–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357719008445030.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Kortunov, Andrei. "Civil ‐ military relations in the USSR." Peace Review 2, no. 3 (June 1990): 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10402659008425553.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Rizvi, H.-A. "Civil-military relations in contemporary Pakistan." Survival 40, no. 2 (January 1998): 96–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396338.1998.10107840.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Herspring, Dale. "Russian Civil-Military Relations: Putin's Legacy." Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 38, no. 1 (2011): 77–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187633211x564193.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Burk, James. "Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations." Armed Forces & Society 29, no. 1 (October 2002): 7–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327x0202900102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Zagorski, Paul W. "Civil-Military Relations And Argentine Democracy." Armed Forces & Society 14, no. 3 (April 1988): 407–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327x8801400305.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Hagiwara, N. "Civil-Military Relations in Southeast Asia." Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association 40 (1989): 117–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7218/nenpouseijigaku1953.40.0_117.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Tsukamoto, H. "Civil-Military Relations in Modern China." Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association 40 (1989): 97–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.7218/nenpouseijigaku1953.40.0_97.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Croissant, Aurel, and Adhi Priamarizki. "Civil-Military Relations in Southeast Asia." Contemporary Southeast Asia 41, no. 2 (December 30, 2018): 323–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2p.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Böhmelt, Tobias, Ulrich Pilster, and Atsushi Tago. "Naval Forces and Civil-Military Relations." Journal of Global Security Studies 2, no. 4 (September 26, 2017): 346–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogx012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Piplani, Varun, and Caitlin Talmadge. "When War Helps Civil–military Relations." Journal of Conflict Resolution 60, no. 8 (July 10, 2016): 1368–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002714567950.

Full text
Abstract:
Coups remain a widespread and consequential political phenomenon, but it remains unclear whether interstate conflict protects leaders from the risk of coups or increases this risk. We theorize that interstate conflict—especially when it is prolonged—should protect domestic regimes from military overthrow by foreclosing many of the key pathways by which elites plot and execute coups. We test this argument using event history modeling. The evidence provides support for our claim that coup risk declines in the presence of enduring interstate conflict. Just as important, we detect no evidence that war increases coup risk.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography