Academic literature on the topic 'Circolazione monetale'

2010 - 2011<br>La ricerca, partendo da uno studio analitico delle monete recuperate nello scavo della Regio VIII, Insula 7.1-15 di Pompei, nell'ambito delle indagini archeologiche condotte tra il 2005 ed il 2009 dall'Univerity of Cincinnati e dalla Stanford University (Pompeii Archeological Research Project: Porta Stabia - PARP: PS), ha come obiettivo quello di fornire un contributo aggiornato su presenze e circolazione monetale a Pompei tra il IV secolo a.C. ed il 79 d.C.... [a cura dell'autore]<br>X n.s.

Cette recherche se base principalement sur l’utilisation de l’instrument monétaire – particulièrement la monnaie de bronze – afin d’analyser les processus de transformation de l’économie d’un ensemble territorial spécifique : le Latium méridional.Les monnaies proviennent de contextes archéologiques variés : habitats à continuité d'occupation, complexes agricoles, villas, aires funéraires. La contextualisation du mobilier numismatique, associée à d'autres classes de matériel, peut nous permettre d'évaluer, en milieu rural, les phénomènes éventuels de circulation monétaire sur le long terme ou de résidualité. La présence, au sein de la masse monétaire hétérogène en circulation – composée de monnaies impériales romaines, vandales, ostrogothes et byzantines – de minuscules piécettes illisibles, de monnaies volontairement sectionnées et d'exemplaires contrefaits permet de replacer ces découvertes au cœur des vifs débats de ces dernières années. L'instrument monétaire ne semble perdurer dans les transactions quotidiennes que jusqu’aux émissions de Justin II. Cette brusque rupture dans la circulation de la masse monétaire et l'apparente absence d'émissions postérieures au VIe siècle nécessite une explication, surtout si on la met en relation avec la continuité de production de l'atelier monétaire byzantin de Rome, tout proche<br>This research is mainly based on the use of the monetary instrument – in especial way, the bronze coins – to analyze the economic transformation processes of a specific area: the southern Latium. The coins are from different archaeological contexts: villages, villas, agricultural complex, cemeteries. The contextualization of coins finds, combined with other classes of materials, can allow us to evaluate, in rural context, the possible phenomena of circulation of money in the long period or residuality. The presence, within the heterogeneous money supply in circulation – composed of Roman imperial coins, coins of the Vandals, Ostrogoths and Byzantine coins – of tiny illegible coins, clipped coins and counterfeit coins, it allows us to place these findings in the living heart of the debate of recent years. The monetary instrument does not seem to persist, in daily transactions, which up to the emissions of Justin II, or shortly after. This abrupt break in the circulation of money supply and the apparent absence of issues after the sixth century need explanation, especially if we relate to the continuity of the production of Byzantine mint of Rome

Questa tesi di laurea ha come argomento lo studio sulla circolazione delle monete romane imperiali, prodotte dalla zecca di Antiochia di Siria, all'interno delle province occidentali dell'impero, in un periodo compreso tra il III e il V secolo d.C. Dopo un'introduzione sulla storia della città di Antiochia e sull'attività della sua zecca nel periodo precedente a quello preso in considerazione, verranno esaminati i ritrovamenti monetali, suddivisi in due categorie (single finds e tesori), nell'area compresa tra l'Asia Minore occidentale e la Penisola Iberica, organizzando i ritrovamenti secondo il sistema dioclezianeo-costantiniano delle diocesi. L'obiettivo di questo studio è quello di analizzare la quantità e la tipologia di monete rinvenute all'interno delle varie diocesi, e anche di evidenziare quali possano essere i pattern di circolazione delle monete antiochene in aree così distanti dal luogo di produzione.

The purpose of this work is to study cathars of Lombardy using four main ecclesiastical sources: the anonymous De heresi catharorum, the Summa contra catharos et valdenses of Moneta of Cremona, the Summa de catharis of Raniero of Piacenza and the Tractatus de hereticis written by Anselm of Alessandria. The first chapter of the first volume focuses on the Dominican historian Antoine Dondaine and his historiographical heritage about inquisition and heretics of the Middle age. Through a corpus of unpublished letters preserved at Saulchoir Library in Paris, the aim is to understand the context of his cultural formation and the origins of the controversy with the Italian historian Raffaello Morghen, an important debate of the past which is useful to evaluate the actual controversy on deconstructionism. The second chapter reconstructs the circulation and the reception of the De heresi catharorum and the Summa de catharis in order to identify the textual transformations of the two written and grasp the mentality of roman-catholic polemicists and inquisitors in writing antiheretical treatise. The study shows also a strong circulation during the Modern age when catholics and protestants used and preserved antiheretical texts for controversial purposes. From the historiographical object (Antoine Dondaine), passing through the circulation and diffusion of antiheretical texts during the modern and medieval period, we finally come to the historical object: cathars in Lombardy in the XIII century. The analysis of Moneta of Cremona’s treatise and the Tractatus of hereticis, once the polemician and inquisitorial filter is recognised, let us know some elements of doctrines and practices of heretics. The Summa contra catharos et valdenses, which has been studied from the privileged point of view of a BNF manuscript, give some more information about the lombard heretic called Desiderius. According to the latest suggestions about the importance to returning to texts, in the second volume, we propose new editions of the De heresi catharorum and the Summa de catharis. The written of Raniero is placed in the larger context of the Tractatus de hereticis. These editions present the variants of all manuscripts and, in the case of the Raniero’s account, reconsider the importance of the manuscript from Budapest which contains a more authentic version of the text.