Academic literature on the topic 'Choix (philosophie) – Prise de décision'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Choix (philosophie) – Prise de décision.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Choix (philosophie) – Prise de décision"
Makindu, Darius. "L’autonomie en fin de vie face aux croyances, pratiques et valeurs socio-culturelles congolaises." Droit, Santé et Société N° 2, no. 2 (December 1, 2023): 83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/dsso.102.0083.
Full textSeymour, Michel. "L'indétermination de la logique. À propos de La norme du vrai de Pascal Engel." Dialogue 31, no. 1 (1992): 87–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0012217300048496.
Full textForner, Yann, and Pierre Vrignaud. "Décision d’orientation assistée par ordinateur : l’apport de l’informatique à l’analyse des processus." L’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle 25, no. 1 (1996): 31–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/binop.1996.1132.
Full textBettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne. "Processus de choix construit du consommateur." Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) 15, no. 2 (June 2000): 81–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/076737010001500205.
Full textDugas, Marylène, and Nils Chaillet. "Enquête qualitative sur la prise de décision en obstétrique : le choix du mode d’accouchement après césarienne." Reflets 17, no. 2 (September 6, 2012): 77–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1012130ar.
Full textCHENARD, Pierre. "L’utilisation de l’information par les cégépiens du secteur général pour leur orientation vers l’université, une étude de sociologie institutionnelle." Sociologie et sociétés 20, no. 1 (September 30, 2002): 71–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/001135ar.
Full textGabriel, Patrick. "Contingence de la décision: influence de la situation sur le recueil et la prédiction du choix." Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) 18, no. 2 (June 2003): 31–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/076737010301800202.
Full textLefèvre, Pierre-Charles, and Laurent Msellati. "La prise de décision en santé animale." Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux 46, no. 3 (March 1, 1993): 505–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9458.
Full textBertrand-Gastaldy, Suzanne. "De quelques éléments à considérer avant de choisir un niveau d’analyse ou un langage documentaire." Documentation et bibliothèques 32, no. 1-2 (October 22, 2018): 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1052706ar.
Full textDomenech, P. "La décision, cette inconnue…" European Psychiatry 30, S2 (November 2015): S51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.09.145.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Choix (philosophie) – Prise de décision"
Cozic, Mikaël. "Fondements cognitifs du choix en rationalité limitée." Paris 4, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA040220.
Full textDevised by economists, mathematicians and philosophers, the theory of rational choice is a powerful, elegant and fruitful model of decision making. Such virtues make it the core of formalization in contemporary economics. Yet, rational choice theory is widely criticized. One of the most recurrent criticism has been formulated by H. Simon in the fifties. According to him, the theory's hypotheses are incompatible with agents' cognitive limitations. People exhibit at best bounded rationality. From this critic, a project came out : the project of modelling bounded rationality. Today, the project is more lively than ever, but lots of disagreements remain : there are divergences on how to lead the project, and, more importantly on whether the project is well-founded. Consequently, there exists a true need of foundational clarification, which should integrate methodological justification and modelling's possibilities. The aim of our dissertation is to lead such a clarification. First, we expound classical models of choice and set up an epistemological framework (chapters 1 and 2). We propose a methodological reconstruction of bounded rationality as a project of cognitive unidealization of classical models (chapter 3). Starting from this foundation, we analyse the main models of bounded rationality and defend the idea of a procedural selection model (chapter 4). The last part is made of two essays on the use of logical tools: the first on epistemic logic (chapter 5), the second on computability and complexity theories (chapter 6)
Henry, Emmanuel. "L'agent et la non-naturalité de l'objet économique." Paris 1, 1999. http://www.theses.fr/1999PA010052.
Full textLee, Douglas. "The metacognitive control of decision-making." Thesis, Sorbonne université, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019SORUS525.
Full textEverything we do is guided by value. In brief, the value we assign to something summarizes the impact we thinkitwill have on our lives. The term value can be used to assess virtually anything. Value is goal-dependent: e.g., value for water is different than value for a soft bed. Value is context-dependent: e.g., value for a hammer is different when building versus fishing. Value is subjective: e.g., a work of art might be treasure to some, garbage to others. Even when taking all this into account, however, the values that we express for particular options are not always consistent. We do not always choose according to our preferences, as derived byassessing options individually. Under current theories, such preference reversals are interpretedas errors that arise from unreliable signaling within the brain. We alternatively propose that people can change their mind after reassessing the value of options while pondering the decision. So, why do we carefully ponder some decisions, but not others? We develop a computational model of the metacognitive control of decisions, where we assume that the amount of cognitive resources deployed is controlled by an effort-confidence tradeoff. Importantly, the anticipated benefit of allocating resources varies according to difficulty and importance. The model predicts choices, choice confidence, mental effort, and preference change, in a critically different manner from current models. We compare and test these predictions in a systematic manner, using a dedicated behavioral paradigm. Our results provide a mechanistic link between effort, confidence, and preference reversals, in a way that has not previously been considered
Jabarian, Brian. "Opérationnaliser l'incertitude morale : définir un cadre d'analyse pour l'esprit critique dans un monde incertain." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 1, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023PA01H223.
Full textThis Ph.D. in philosophy explores the normative uncertainty problem, i.e. the complex ethical problem of what should we do when uncertain about what we should do? We conduct our thesis in the tradition of the long-forgotten philosophy of science tradition of operationalization. The latter is a thorough analytical approach that allows for applied investigations of a concept whose empirical implications are neither proven nor clear. In the case of an ethical evaluation or choice problem, operationalization includes two main dimensions: (1) providing a framework for reasoning, comparing the values of options, and decision-making by individuals or groups; (2) providing empirical evidence to demonstrate the concept’s relevance for applied research and further scientific investigations. We divide our thesis into two main parts based on these dimensions. A preceding introduction addresses normative uncertainty and its relations to other ethical and meta-ethical concepts. Part I provides a comprehensive framework for comparing the values of options, reasoning, and making individual decisions under normative uncertainty, depending on the types and amount of information available to the decision-maker. Part II demonstrates how we may employ humanities in survey methods and establish normative uncertainty as an empirical fact by combining both disciplines. The conclusion summarizes our thesis’ main contributions
Grelot, Pascale. "Acquisition de l'information : comparaison choix individuel - choix collectif." Grenoble 2 : ANRT, 1986. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb375983673.
Full textČapek, Jakub. "Le temps dans la décision : la décision dans le temps : le problème de la décision chez Bergson, Heidegger, Sartre et Ricoeur." Paris 10, 2001. http://www.theses.fr/2001PA100046.
Full textIn the introduction, the author tries to develop a basic analysis of decision. He divides his analysis in two problems. Firstly, how does the decision appear in an intentional action? Secondly, can the experience of a dilemma tell us something about decision? The decision appears in the first case as something which is implicit in the action, whereas in the second case it is explicit, i. E. In the first case We presuppose the decision - which often really did not occur - and in the second case, the decision in no longer any tacit presupposition: now We are forced to decide. This distinction seems to be connected to the traditional question: does decision concern means or aims as well? Which is the relation between the intentional action and the dilemma? Is it an temporal linearity: dilemma - decision - intention - action? The author argues that if the decision has double meaning, if it can even change its meaning, it cannot form this linearity any more. To develop this question of temporal structure of decision, which is the basic question of the whole work, he introduces another classical distinction. This introduction if followed by a discussion of four philosophic contributions to this problem. The author tries to develop a critical interpretation and to derive consequences for his own questioning. In this part he discuses basic texts of Henri Bergson, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre et Paul Ricœur. Finally, in his Conclusions, he tries to show the impact of preceding reflections on several problems connected to the problem of decision. It is firstly the problem of the reason (motive) of an action, secondly the problem of rationality, thirdly the question of freedom in decision and finally the question of the subject in decision (who decides?, how is he present in his decision ?). In the last chapter, the author develops a detailed analysis of the temporal structure of decision
Lambert, Aude. "La diversité des structures de rationalité en microéconomie." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016AIXM3047.
Full textStandard microeconomics displays the concept of rationality as the maximisation of expected utility i.e. in a narrow and unequivocal sense. The criticisms against this concept made by behavioural economics or sociology are well known. I aim at providing an analysis of some of them in order to emphasise the fact that they mainly highlight the diversity of reasoning modes. But the issue is to know whether the diversity of reasoning modes necessarily leads to reject the standard model. My intention falls into two fields : the theory of Rational Choice and the Game Theory. From the point of view of behavioural economics, I assume that the maximisation is nothing more than a local reasoning mode that can be assessed in relation to the context of action. But this assumption implies correcting the standard Game Theory as well. The fact that the general equilibrium, based on the maximisation of expected utility, cannot be used anymore as an unique model calls a new kind of formalisation. So, I point out that agent-based modelling allows us to conceive, in a counterfactual way, interactions between rational economic agents in their context. Therefore, in this respect, rational patterns of actions and interactions design possible worlds without having to choose between them
Valognes, Fabrice. "Essais en theorie des choix collectifs." Caen, 1998. http://www.theses.fr/1998CAEN0579.
Full textThe main purpose of the thesis is the social choice theory. Our contribution is based on different analysis. With the help of the geometry analysis, we show that, surprisingly, subtle, unexpected election behaviors can arise when voters are restricted to only three kinds of preferences. As shown, conflict between pairwise and positional methods occurs in abundance. In order to complete the former results, we again use the geometry of voting to analyze all three candidates profiles satisfying black's single peakedness constraint, we characterize all associated election behavior. The same analysis is applied to related profile constraints (sen, ward). We knew that different procedures may yield different solutions. However no study was done to estimate the probability that they all simultaneously pick the same outcome. We provide new techniques to answer this question. Another study is based on the condorcet efficiency of weighted scoring rules when voter indifference between candidate is allowed. We provide new results with respect this hypothesis. Finally, we evaluate the statistical coalitional manipulability of various social choice functions. We analyze and measure the manipulability of some common voting procedures and we study the impact of the less or more homogeneous feature of preferences on the manipulability measure by using probability models
Stal-Le, Cardinal Julie. "Etude des dysfonctionnements dans la prise de décision : application au choix d'acteur." Phd thesis, Châtenay-Malabry, Ecole centrale de Paris, 2000. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00318669.
Full textStal-Le, Cardinal Julie. "Etude des dysfonctionnements dans la prise de décision. Application au choix d'acteur." Phd thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris, 2000. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00318669.
Full textNous proposons un premier modèle : la DTL ou Decision Time Line. La DTL représente toute décision comme un processus de prise de décision, qui suit une ligne de vie. L'enchaînement d'un certain nombre d'étapes peut se dérouler dans des ordres différents à partir d'une question posée jusqu'à la transmission de la réponse à l'interlocuteur.
Un deuxième modèle permet de représenter et de quantifier l'impact des dysfonctionnements dans le processus de décision. Un espace de représentation des dysfonctionnements, au sein de la DTL, est proposé. Il s'agit de décomposer tout dysfonctionnement en dysfonctionnements élémentaires, d'identifier les étapes de la DTL ayant généré les dysfonctionnements et de mesurer les écarts induits. Nous considérons, ici, la décision de façon globale et la modélisation proposée est applicable à tout type de prise de décision.
L'étude des dysfonctionnements dans les processus de prise de décision se concrétise, ensuite, par une application au choix d'acteur et par une présentation des outils développés pour faciliter ce type particulier de décision. Ces outils sont regroupés sous le nom de SACADO : Système d'Aide au Choix d'Acteur et aux Décisions d'Organisation. SACADO propose un processus cible à suivre pour réduire les risques de dysfonctionnements. Cette méthode permet également, pour un dysfonctionnement donné, d'en analyser les causes potentielles et d'en déduire des préconisations. Enfin, les dysfonctionnements analysés par SACADO alimentent l'analyse globale de l'organisation d'une entreprise.
Finalement, une application industrielle au sein de deux sites du groupe Vallourec a permis une première validation de la méthode mise au point. Elle a permis de confirmer que SACADO répond à un réel besoin industriel.
Books on the topic "Choix (philosophie) – Prise de décision"
Sergio, Barba-Romero, ed. Choix multicritere dans l'entreprise: Principes et pratique. Paris: Hermes, 1993.
Find full textResponsible decision making: Praxiology : the international annual of practical philosophy and methodology, vol. 16. New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Publishers, 2008.
Find full textSortir de l'indécision. Québec: Septembre éditeur, 2007.
Find full textJudgement and choice: The psychology of decision. 2nd ed. Chichester [West Sussex]: Wiley, 1987.
Find full textJérôme, France, Andreau Jean, and Pittia Sylvie, eds. Mentalités et choix économiques des romains. Bordeaux: Ausonius, 2004.
Find full textMary, Zey, ed. Decision making: Alternatives to rational choice models. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage, 1992.
Find full textI'm here to help. Concord, Calif: Striped Cat Press, 2012.
Find full textRéfléchir avant d'agir: Proverbes, pensées et citations. 2nd ed. Montréal: Éditions Québecor, 2012.
Find full textPineur, Catherine. Plouf plouf! Achille hésite. Paris: L'École des loisirs, 2004.
Find full textPunching clouds: An introduction to the complexity of public decision-making. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications, 2012.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Choix (philosophie) – Prise de décision"
"Problème de choix de portefeuille." In Prise de décision financière, 19–26. Presses de l'Université Laval, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jj.5024385.5.
Full text"Choix de portefeuilles optimaux en contexte moyenne-variance." In Prise de décision financière, 27–40. Presses de l'Université Laval, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jj.5024385.6.
Full textDondin-Payre, Monique. "La prise de décision économique privée d’après les Biographies." In Mentalités et choix économiques des Romains, 45–70. Ausonius Éditions, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.ausonius.9978.
Full textPittia, Sylvie. "L’influence des liens de parenté sur la prise de décision économique : le cas des Tullii Cicerones." In Mentalités et choix économiques des Romains, 21–44. Ausonius Éditions, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.ausonius.9975.
Full textJullien, Stéphane. "Les interventions orthophoniques avec les personnes présentant un TSA. La communication alternative et améliorée." In Langage et communication dans les troubles du spectre de l’autisme, 77–100. Éditions de l'Université de Lorraine, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.62688/edul/b9782384510696/06.
Full textCADDEO, Julie. "L’action des pouvoirs locaux face aux crises épidémiques au XVIIIe siècle." In Les épidémies au prisme des SHS, 99–108. Editions des archives contemporaines, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.17184/eac.5995.
Full textReports on the topic "Choix (philosophie) – Prise de décision"
Gruber, Verena, Ingrid Peignier, and Charlotte Dubuc. Pratiques et tactiques de vente des concessionnaires automobiles au Québec. CIRANO, October 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.54932/bryk4403.
Full text