Academic literature on the topic 'Cervical pain'

Includes abstract.
Includes bibliographical references.
Chronic musculoskeletal conditions of the spine and periphery are a burden both internationally and in South Africa. There is a socio-economic burden as a consequence of the severity, duration and recurrence of chronic cervical musculoskeletal conditions among information technology and sedentary office workers. However, the precise mechanisms behind chronic cervical disorders remain unclear. It is theorised that the pathophysiological mechanisms in chronic cervical musculoskeletal conditions share a similar theoretical framework to chronic pain itself. The biopsychosocial model of chronic pain accepts the dynamic nature of pain. This model accepts the dual biological and psychosocial components that enhance the experience and maintenance of chronic pain, through central sensitisation. There appears to be a neurophysiological, biomechanical and psychological link between the cervical area and the temporomandibular area. Although numerous studies have implied that individuals with temporomandibular disorders have concurrent cervical dysfunction, there is currently no evidence that individuals with cervical dysfunction exhibit altered muscle activity in the masseter and cervical erector spinae muscles or report teeth clenching habits. Consequently, identification of factors that may contribute to chronic cervical musculoskeletal conditions, stemming from the temporomandibular area, may potentially be lost. The aim of the present study was to explore the activity levels of the cervicomandibular muscles in females with chronic cervical musculoskeletal conditions, who showed no symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. This study had a descriptive cross-sectional correlational design with single-blinding. The telephonic screening process was followed by the signing of informed consent forms. Validated questionnaires were used for categorisation and comparison of the socio-demographic and biopsychosocial profiles of the pain group (n = 20) and the no pain group (n = 22). The screening, informed consent and questionnaires were completed by an assistant. The first of five questionnaires, the adapted Research Diagnostic Criteria History questionnaire, was used as an instrument for exclusion of temporomandibular disorders and the recording of a daytime parafunctional teeth clenching habit. The remaining four questionnaires, listed as the Neck Disability Index, the Computer Usage Questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory, and the EuroQol-5D were used for determining levels of cervical disability for categorisation and comparison between groups, as well as for determining levels of pain-related disability, occupational and sporting activity, and health related quality of life.

Background Cervicobrachial pain is a painful condition which, when chronic, might lead to high levels of disability. Limited data from small studies have reported that the lateral glide mobilisation is effective on reducing pain in the short-term. The primary aim of this study was to establish whether the lateral glide mobilisation technique was effective in reducing pain in the long-term. Methods Literature reviews on cervicobrachial pain provided the rational to conduct a phase III trial. An audit and a preliminary study were used to inform methods for the trial. A single-centre randomised clinical trial was conducted on participants with chronic cervicobrachial pain. Participants were randomised to receive either the lateral glide with self-management or self-management alone. The trial was powered to detect a between group difference of 20mm on worst pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 52 weeks follow-up. Results Ninety-nine participants were recruited to the trial. There was a non-significant between-group difference for mean VAS(worst pain) scores at 52 week follow-up (p=0.52; 95% CI -14.72 to 7.44). Conclusion The findings from this trial provided no evidence that the lateral glide was more effective than a comparator in the management of chronic cervicobrachial pain in the long-term.

Background: Neck pain is a major public health with great effects on both the individual and society. Cervical radiculopathy is a relatively common form of neck pain with neurological symptoms. Physical therapy is often the first treatment but there is paucity in literature reviews investigating the effects of physical therapy. Objective: To assess the effects of physical therapy for cervical radiculopathy. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro and Web of Science. A total of 12 RCT articles were included in the study. The articles were reviewed based on the aims of the study and the PEDro scale. Results: Eight studies of moderate quality and four high quality. Most studies used the same outcome measures. Most common interventions were traction and manual therapy. Outcomes were varied with some reporting positive effects and others no change. Treatment periods, number of sessions and follow-up varied. In most cases, the positive results wore off at follow-up and differences between groups less pronounced. Conclusions: The quality of RCTs investigating cervical radiculopathy is variable. There is limited evidence suggesting that physical therapy treatment can have a measurable and significant long-term effect on cervical radiculopathy.
Bakgrund: Nacksmärta är ett allvarligt folkhälsoproblem med stor effekt på både den enskilde och samhället. Cervikal radikulopati är en relativt vanlig form av nacksmärta med neurologiska symtom. Fysioterapi är ofta den första behandlingen för detta tillstånd men det är brist på litteraturstudier som undersöker fysioterapins effekter. Syfte: Att undersöka effekterna av fysioterapi för cervikal radikulopati. Metod: Litteratursökningar gjordes i PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro och Web of Science. Totalt inkluderades 12 RCT artiklar i studien. Artiklarna granskades utifrån studiens frågeställningar samt PEDro kvalitetsgranskningsmall. Resultat: Åtta studier var av måttlig kvalitet och fyra hög kvalitet. De flesta studier använde samma utfallsmått och alla uppmätte smärta, funktionshinder och funktion. De två vanligaste behandlingarna var traktion och manuell terapi. Resultaten av insatserna varierade då vissa rapporterade positiva effekter och andra ingen förändring. Behandlingsperioder, antal sessioner samt uppföljning varierade. I de flesta fall, så avtog de positiva resultaten vid uppföljning och skillnaden mellan grupperna blev mindre uppenbara. Konklusion: Denna litteraturöversikt påvisade att kvaliteten på de RCT studier som undersöker cervikal radikulopati varierar. Resultaten visar att det finns begränsad evidens som tyder på att fysioterapi kan ha en mätbar och betydande inverkan på cervikal radikulopati i längden.

Múltiples revisiones científicas han intentado determinar los factores pronósticos en la evolución del latigazo cervical sin llegar a un consenso. Nuestros resultados se han obtenido tras 8 años de estudio en pacientes controlados desde la primera visita en el servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación del Hospital de Mataró. Se han utilizado escalas de valoración fáciles de cumplimentar y cuantificar para poder obtener los resultados en el mismo momento de la consulta. Este hecho es importante, ya que la mayoría de las escalas que se identifican en los artículos publicados son poco prácticas en la consulta diaria por la dificultad que conllevan en su cumplimentación y valoración. Los factores pronósticos que hemos identificado en nuestra muestran han sido: la edad, la presencia de “vértigos”, la intensidad del dolor cervical inicial valorada mediante la escala analógica visual y el grado de funcionalidad cervical inicial valorado mediante el Northwick Park Hospital Neck Pain Questionnaire.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Neck pain has been considered a costly musculoskeletal problem, with impacts on health and quality of life of individuals may be related to repetitive strain and maintenance of postures. These changes cause mechanical and nociceptive disorders of the neck region may cause balance disorders. Maintenance of postural balance occurs through the action of the postural control system, any compromise of this system can lead to body imbalance. The dissertation was divided into two research papers, with different objectives. The first aim was to evaluate the influence of neck pain in women of postural control and verify the relation between pain and the possible changes in sensory systems and body posture and in the second, to investigate the correlation between the intensity of pain, head posture and postural sway. Neck pain group was composed of women, aged between 20 and 50, with neck pain for more than three months and the control group of women without neck pain. For characterization of the groups used interview, neck disability index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale. Postural balance was assessed by a force platform with acquisition frequency of 100 Hz. Postural balance with manipulation of the sensory systems was evaluated by Dynamic Posturography Foam-laser. Posture was assessed by the Postural Assessment Software in the sagittal plane right. Normality of variables was checked by Shapiro-Wilk test, and Student t test and Mann Whitney test for comparison between groups. The relationship between variables was assessed by Spearman correlation test. Significance level of 5%. Groups were homogeneous in date demographics. Variables of postural balance showed higher amplitude and velocity of displacement of the center of pressure in the neck pain group, showing greater postural sway in this group. There were significant differences in craniovertebral angle, being lower in symptomatic women, showing forward head posture. In dynamic posturography difference was observed between the groups and the score obtained by the group with neck pain in the six sensory conditions showed that postural balance showed greater impairment. Neck pain and forward head posture have a deleterious effect on postural control in symptomatic women. Pain intensity correlated with the COP sway area and the craniovertebral angle indicating that women with cervical pain had forward head posture associated with a lower postural control.
A dor cervical vem sendo considerada um oneroso problema osteomuscular, com impacto sobre a saúde e qualidade de vida dos indivíduos podendo estar relacionada aos esforços repetitivos e a manutenção de posturas inadequadas. Essas alterações provocam transtornos mecânicos e nociceptivos na região cervical, podendo causar distúrbios do equilíbrio. A manutenção do equilíbrio postural ocorre por meio da atuação do sistema de controle postural e qualquer comprometimento desse sistema pode dar origem ao desequilíbrio corporal. A dissertação foi dividida em dois artigos de pesquisa, com objetivos distintos. No primeiro objetivamos avaliar a influência da dor cervical no controle postural de mulheres e verificar a relação da dor com as possíveis alterações nos sistemas sensoriais e postura corporal e, no segundo, investigar a correlação entre a intensidade da dor, postura da cabeça e oscilação postural. O grupo dor cervical foi composto por mulheres, entre 20 e 50 anos, com dor cervical por mais de três meses e o grupo controle por mulheres sem dor cervical. Para caracterização dos grupos utilizou-se ficha de anamnese, índice de incapacidade cervical (NDI) e Escala Visual Analógica. O equilíbrio postural foi avaliado por uma plataforma de força com fequência de aquisição de 100 Hz. O equilíbrio postural com a manipulação dos sistemas sensoriais foi avaliado pela posturografia dinâmica Foam-laser. A postura foi avaliada pelo Software de Avaliação Postural no plano sagital direito. A normalidade das variáveis foi verificada pelo teste de Shapiro Wilk, e os testes t-student e Mann Whitney para comparação entre grupos. A relação entre as variáveis foi verificada pelo teste de correlação de Sperman. Nível de significância de 5%. Os grupos apresentaram homogeneidade nas variáveis demográficas. Nas variáveis de equilíbrio postural observou-se maior amplitude e velocidade de deslocamento do centro de pressão no grupo dor cervical, demonstrando maior oscilação postural neste grupo. Houve diferença significativa no ângulo craniovertebral, sendo menor nas mulheres sintomáticas, mostrando anteriorização da cabeça. Na posturografia dinâmica observou-se diferença entre os grupos e o escore obtido pelo grupo dor cervical nas seis condições sensoriais demonstrou que o equilíbrio postural apresentou maior comprometimento. A dor cervical e a postura anteriorizada da cabeça têm efeito deletério no controle postural de mulheres sintomáticas. A intensidade da dor apresentou correlação com a área da elipse e com o ângulo craniovertebral indicando que as mulheres com dor cervical apresentaram postura anteriorizada da cabeça associada a um menor controle postural.

Introdução: A prevalência de disfunção musculoesquelética entre trabalhadores usuários de computador (TUC) pode variar entre 10 a 62% e os lugares mais acometidos são os membros superiores, pescoço, cabeça e a coluna vertebral. As queixas musculoesqueléticas nesses trabalhadores apresentam etiologia multifatorial e dentre as principais causas é possível citar aspectos posturais e fatores psicossociais. O Maastricht Upper Extremity Questionnaire (MUEQ-Br) é uma das poucas ferramentas existentes na literatura para avaliar aspectos ergonômicos e psicossociais relacionados ao trabalho com uso do computador. A dor cervical é a queixa musculoesquelética mais comum em trabalhadores de escritório usuários de computador. A coexistência entre dor cervical e disfunção temporomandibular (DTM) é comumente citada na literatura. A adoção da postura em anteriorização da cabeça para uso do computador pode estar associada ao aparecimento de sintomas orofaciais e cervicais. A posição sentada é a mais adotada nos ambientes de trabalho especialmente quando este envolve o uso de computador, entretanto, a manutenção dessa posição por tempo prolongado pode acarretar a adoção de posturas inadequadas e intensificar a sobrecarga nas estruturas do sistema musculoesquelético. Desta forma, a manutenção da postura sentada pode estar relacionada ao desenvolvimento de alterações de postura corporal, DTM e disfunção cervical. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar associações entre dor cervical, DTM e alterações na postura estática em trabalhadores de escritório usuários de computador com e sem relato de dor cervical crônica. Material e Métodos: A amostra desse estudo foi selecionada a partir da aplicação do Maastricht Upper Extremity Questionnaire que contempla 7 domínios (posto de trabalho, postura corporal, controle do trabalho, demanda de trabalho, pausas, ambiente de trabalho e suporte social), preenchidos por trabalhadores usuários de computador. Participaram deste estudo 52 mulheres trabalhadoras de escritório usuárias de computador em dois grupos: Grupo com dor cervical crônica e incapacidade (GD, n=26 - 36.50 anos - IC95%: 33.40-36.60; 66.37 kg - IC 95%: 62.48-70.26 e 1.62 m - IC95%: 1.60-1.65) e Grupo sem relato de dor cervical (GS, n=26 - 33.81 anos - IC 95%: 33.66-36.95, 71.75 kg - IC95%: 65.90-77.60 e 1.64 m - IC95%: 1.62-1.67). Como critérios de inclusão as funcionárias deveriam exercer a mesma função há pelo menos 12 meses (GD, 110 meses - IC95%: 73-147 /GS, 91 meses - IC95%:63-119) e utilizar o computador ao menos 4 horas por dia durante a jornada de trabalho (GD, 7.46 horas/dia - IC95%: 7.10-7.83 /GS, 7.58 horas/dia - IC95%: 7.23-7.92). No grupo com dor cervical crônica as trabalhadoras deveriam apresentar relato positivo de dor crônica cervical e se enquadrarem nos seguintes critérios: a) dor cervical há pelo menos 3 meses; b) dor de intensidade 3 na maioria dos dias em uma escala numérica de dor (END) (0 a 10, sendo 0 = sem dor e 10 = pior dor possível) e c) limitação funcional, pelo menos leve, no Índice de incapacidade relacionada ao pescoço (NDI): 10-28% (5-14 pontos) - incapacidade leve; 30-48% (15- 24 pontos) - incapacidade moderada; 50-68% (25 35 pontos) - incapacidade severa;72% ou mais (36 pontos ou mais) incapacidade completa. Foram realizadas avaliações clínicas para diagnóstico da DTM por meio do Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), avaliação da dor cervical e mastigatória através da palpação manual e algometria por pressão para obtenção do limiar de dor por pressão (LDP) de estruturas crânio-cervicais, bem como avaliação da postura corporal estática dessas trabalhadoras usando a fotogrametria. Os dados demonstraram distribuição normal de acordo com o teste Shapiro Wilks. O teste-t de student para amostras independentes (p<0.05) foi utilizado para comparar a pontuação máxima de cada domínio do MUEQ-Br entre os grupos sem e com dor cervical crônica. Para verificar diferenças entre os valores médios de LDP e palpação muscular entre os grupos de trabalhadores sem dor e com dor cervical crônica e para verificar diferenças entre os ângulos posturais foi utilizado também o teste-t de Student. Para análise das associações entre as variáveis disfunção temporomandibular, incapacidade relacionada à disfunção cervical, cervicalgia e aspectos do trabalho (domínios do MUEQ) foi utilizada a análise de regressão linear múltipla. Para verificação de diferenças entre valores de porcentagem foi utilizado o teste de Qui-quadrado (p<0.05). O pacote estatístico utilizado foi o SPSS versão 22. Resultados: Os resultados deste estudo demonstraram que ao compararmos os domínios do MUEQ-Br, o grupo com dor cervical crônica obteve maior pontuação no domínio postura corporal (GD, 12.58 - IC95%: 11.21-13.94/ GS, 9.42 - IC95%: 8-10.84) e no item queixas (GD, 17.46- IC95%: 14.17-20.75/ GS, 8.58 - IC95%: 6.14-11.02), bem como na pontuação total do questionário (GD, 40.08 - IC95%: 35.01-45.15/ GS, 33.31 - IC95%: 28.99-37.63). Os voluntários com dor cervical apresentaram maior porcentagem de diagnósticos de DTM quando comparados com o grupo sem dor (42.30% vs. 23.07%, p<0.05). O grupo com dor apresentou maior intensidade de dor na palpação manual dos músculos cervicais, trapézio (ponto médio) lado direito (GD, 4.03 - IC95%: 3.02-5.06/ GS, 1.46 - IC95%: 0.69-2.23) e suboccipitais direito (GD, 2.58 - IC95%: 1.64-3.51/ GS, 1.0 - IC95%: 0.42-1.58) e esquerdo (GD, 2.15 - IC95%: 1.21-3.09/ GS, 1.0 - IC95%: 0.46-1.54), porém os valores do LDP não foram significativos para nenhum dos músculos avaliados entre os grupos com e sem dor cervical crônica. Também não foram encontradas diferenças significativas na avaliação postural entre os grupos para os ângulos analisados no plano frontal face e vista anterior e para os ângulos analisados no plano sagital. Na análise de associação entre as variáveis, foi observado que quando a incapacidade foi considerada variável dependente em relação à cervicalgia, total da pontuação do MUEQ-Br (aspectos de trabalho) e DTM, foi observado um R2 = 0.93 e todos os preditores mostraram-se significativos no modelo. Nossos resultados demonstram que a incapacidade cervical é influenciada pela DTM, dor no pescoço e aspectos físicos e psicossociais relacionados ao trabalho com uso do computador. Os trabalhadores com dor cervical apresentaram maior porcentagem de diagnósticos de DTM quando comparados com o grupo de trabalhadores sem dor, bem como a intensidade da dor à palpação dos músculos cervicais mostrou-se significativamente maior nos trabalhadores usuários de computador com dor cervical. Assim, é possível sugerir uma associação entre relato de dor cervical, incapacidade cervical e DTM no contexto de trabalho envolvendo o computador em mulheres com dor relato de dor cervical crônica.
Introduction: The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among computer office workers (COW) can vary between 10-62% and the most affected regions affected are the upper extremities, neck, head and spine. Musculoskeletal complaints in these workers have a multifactorial etiology and the main causes are postural aspects and psychosocial factors. The Maastricht Upper Extremity Questionnaire (MUEQ-Br) is one of the few tools available in the literature to evaluate ergonomic and psychosocial aspects of work related to computer use. Neck pain is the most common musculoskeletal complaints in COW. Coexistence between neck pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) are commonly cited in the literature. The adoption of forward head posture for computer use may be linked to the onset of orofacial symptoms. The sitting position is the most widely adopted in the workplace especially when it involves the use of computer, however, to maintain this position for long periods, the adoption of awkward postures could be necessary, increasing the strain on the musculoskeletal system structures. Thus, maintenance of sitting posture may be related to the development of changes in body posture, TMD and neck disorders. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine associations between neck pain, TMD and changes in static body posture on COW with and without chronic neck pain. Material and Methods: The sample of this study was selected from the application of the Maastricht Upper Extremity Questionnaire which includes seven domains (work station, body posture, job control, job demands, break time, work environment and social support). The study included 52 women which work using computer into two groups: Group with chronic neck pain and disability (NPG, n = 26 - 36.50 years confidence interval 95% (CI): 33.40-36.60; 66.37 kg -CI: 62.48-70.26 and 1.62m - 95% CI: 1.60-1.65) and group without neck pain (WONPG, n = 26 - 33.81 years - CI: 33.66-36.95, 71.75 kg - CI: 65.90-77.60 m and 1.64 - CI: 1.62-1.67). As criteria inclusion, the employees should exercise the same function for at least 12 months (NPG, 110 months - CI: 73-147 / WONPG, 91 months - CI: 63-119) and use the computer for at least 4 hours day during the work day (NPG, 7:46 hours / day - CI: 7.10-7.83 / WONPG, 7:58 hours/day - CI: 7.23-7.92). In the group with chronic neck pain workers should present a positive report of chronic neck pain and falling within the criteria: a) neck pain for at least 3 months; b) pain intensity 3 on most days on a numerical pain scale (NPS) (0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain) and c) Neck pain related disability at least mild in the Neck Disability Index (NDI): 10-28% (5-14 points) - mild disability; 30-48% (15- 24 points) - moderate disability; 50-68% (25 - 35 points) - severe disability, 72% or more (36 or more points) - Complete. Clinical assessments for diagnosis of TMD was conducted using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), evaluation of masticatory and neck pain through manual palpation and algometry pressure to obtain the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of craniocervical structures as well as evaluation of the static body posture by the use of photogrammetry. The data showed normal distribution according to the Shapiro Wilks test. The Student\'s t-test for independent samples (p <0.05) was used to compare the maximum score for each domain MUEQ-Br between the groups with and without chronic neck pain. Differences between the mean values of LDP and muscle tenderness between groups of workers without pain and chronic neck pain and to check for differences between the postural angles were verified by student t-test. For analysis of associations between TMD, disability related to neck pain, neck pain and \"aspects of the job\" (domains of MUEQ) a multivariate regression analysis was used. Differences between the percentage values were verified using chi-square test (p <0.05). The statistical package used was SPSS version 22. Results: The results showed that when comparing the domains of MUEQ-Br, the group with chronic neck pain scored highest in the area posture (NPG, 12.58 points - CI: 11.21-13.94 / WONPG, 9.42 - CI: 8-10.84) and complaints item (NPG, 17.46 - CI: 14.17-20.75 / WONPG, 8.58 - CI: 6.14 -11.02), and the total score of the questionnaire (NPG, 40.08 - CI: 35.01-45.15 / WONPG, 33.31 points - CI: 28.99-37.63). The volunteers with neck pain showed a higher percentage of diagnoses of TMD when compared with the group without pain (42.30% vs. 23:07%, p <0.05). The group with pain had higher pain intensity on manual palpation of the neck muscles, trapezius (midpoint) right (NPG, 4.03 - CI: 3.02-5.06 / WONPG, 1.46 - CI: 0.69-2.23) and right suboccipital (WONPG, 2.58 NPS - CI: 1.64-3.51 / WONP, 1.0 - CI: 0.42-1.58) and left (NPG, 2.15 - CI: 1.21-3.09 / WONP, 1.0 - CI: 0.46 -1.54) but the values of the LDP were not significant for any of the muscles tested between the groups with and without chronic neck pain. Also no significant differences were found in postural assessment between groups for the analyzed angles in the frontal plane face and anterior views and angles analyzed in the sagittal plane. The analysis of association between the variables, it was observed that when disability was considered the dependent variable in relation to the neck pain, total score MUEQ-Br (aspects of work) and TMD, we observed a strong association (R2 = 0.93) and all predictors showed significant in the model. Our results demonstrate that cervical disability is influenced by the TMD, neck pain and physical and psychosocial aspects of the computer work. Workers with neck pain showed a higher percentage of diagnoses of TMD when compared with the group of workers without neck pain, and the pain intensity on palpation of the neck muscles was significantly higher in computer workers with neck pain. Thus, it is possible to suggest an association between reporting of neck pain, neck related disability and TMD in the context of work involving the computer in women reporting chronic neck pain.