Academic literature on the topic 'Business deregulation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Business deregulation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Business deregulation"
Parker, Christine. "Lawyer deregulation via business deregulation: Compliance professionalism and legal professionalism." International Journal of the Legal Profession 6, no. 2 (July 1999): 175–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695958.1999.9960461.
Full textMorimoto, Mitsuo. "Deregulation and the“Laissez-Faire”Business View." TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES 8, no. 10 (2003): 74–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5363/tits.8.10_74.
Full textVarona, Mercedes. "Incentives to Encourage Companies to Become Socially Responsible." Nuevas Tendencias, no. 103 (February 24, 2020): 30–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/022.39422.
Full textPermono, Iswardono Sardjono. "Interest Rate Policy, Inflation and Economic Growth: A Policy Evaluation of Indonesia, 1969-1997." Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business 6, no. 3 (September 12, 2004): 419. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5551.
Full textSchiller, Reuel. "The Curious Origins of Airline Deregulation: Economic Deregulation and the American Left." Business History Review 93, no. 4 (2019): 729–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007680519001247.
Full textAllen, W. Bruce, and Dorothy Robyn. "Trucking Deregulation." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7, no. 1 (1987): 165. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3323364.
Full textKoliousis, Ioannis, Dongmei Cao, and Panagiotis Koliousis. "European transport industry deregulation." Management Research Review 42, no. 9 (September 16, 2019): 1095–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/mrr-04-2018-0160.
Full textEfendy, Muhadjir. "A NEPOTISM AND CRONY IN A BUSINESS, CASE OF INDUSTRIAL DEREGULATION IN INDONESIA." Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan 12, no. 1 (June 1, 2011): 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.23917/jep.v12i1.210.
Full textGoll, Irene, Nancy Brown Johnson, and Abdul A. Rasheed. "Strategic Responses to Deregulation and Their Performance Implications in the U.S. Airline Industry." Business and Politics 8, no. 2 (August 2006): 1–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1152.
Full textRyan, Bernard. "Unifinished Business? The Failure of Deregulation in Employment Law." Journal of Law and Society 23, no. 4 (December 1996): 506. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1410478.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Business deregulation"
Joubert, Marita. "Deregulation in the South African Optometry industry." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/924.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The South African health care industry is fragmented between the private and public sector. The disparity of resources between the private and public sectors as well as the escalating cost of health care services is threatening the sustainability of the private health sector and interferes with the national health policy objectives. Optometry shares the same concerns as the wider South African health industry with regards to accessibility, affordability, quality and equity of services. Deregulation of optometry has been suggested to address these concerns to the benefit of the consumer. But it seems to contradict the proposed higher regulatory environment of the greater private health sector. The objective of the research is to assess whether deregulation is the best way forward for the optometry industry. It also intends to get a more diverse perspective from service providers on the possible effects that deregulation might have on the industry. The study is conducted in three phases. The first two phases involves secondary data and includes an industry analysis and an assessment of the current regulatory framework of the optometry industry. The international deregulation trends in optometry are investigated as well as the deregulation trends of similar industries in South Africa. The third phase of the research includes an online questionnaire and approximately 2000 service providers were invited to participate. The 229 responses was analysed to assess the overall perception of deregulation. The skewed distribution of optometrists between the private and public sectors illustrates the need for more accessible and affordable eye care. Service providers are reluctant to get involved in community service and are not optimistic about the positive effect of deregulation. Professionalism and profitability are feared to be negatively influenced while trends in deregulation suggest that it is beneficial to consumers at least in the short term. Alternative options to deregulation should be investigated. But until the optometry industry increases their contribution to address industry issues, deregulation is the best alternative to improve accessibility, affordability, quality and equity of eye care services. AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die Suid-Afrikaanse gesondheidsorg industrie is gefragmenteer tussen die private en publieke sektor. Die verskil in verspreiding van hulpbronne tussen die private en publieke sektore sowel as die stygende koste van gesondheidsorgdienste dreig die volhoubaarheid van die private sektor en belemmer die doelwitte van die nasionale gesondheidsbeleid. Oogkunde deel dieselfde bekommernisse as die groter Suid-Afrikaanse gesondheidsorg industrie in terme van toeganglikheid, bekostigbaarheid, kwaliteit en gelykheid van dienste. Deregulasie van oogkunde is voorgestel om die kwessies aan te spreek tot voordeel van die verbruiker. Maar dit lyk teenstrydig te wees met die voorgestelde strenger regulasie van die groter private gesondheid sektor. Die doel van die navorsing is om te bepaal of deregulasie die beste weg vorentoe is vir die oogkunde industrie. Dit beoog ook om ‘n meer diverse perspektief van diensverskaffers te verkry rakende die moontlike effek wat deregulasie op die industrie mag hê. Die studie word gedoen in drie fases. Die eerste twee fases behels sekondêre data en sluit ‘n industrie analise en ‘n assessering van die huidige regulatoriese raamwerk van die industrie in. Die internasionale deregulasie neigings in oogkunde word ondersoek sowel as die deregulasie neiging van soortgelyke industrieë in Suid-Afrika. Die derde fase van die navorsing behels ‘n aanlyn vraelys en ongeveer 2000 diensverskaffers is uitgenooi om deel te neem. Die 229 responsies is geanaliseer om die oorsigtelike persepsie van deregulasie te bepaal. Die skewe verspreiding van oogkundiges tussen die private en publieke sektore illustreer die nodigheid van meer toegangklike en bekostigbare oogsorg. Diensverskaffers is huiwerig om betrokke te raak by gemeenskapsdiens en is nie optimisties oor die positiewe effek van deregulasie nie. Daar word gevrees dat professionalisme en winsgewendheid negatief beïnvloed sal word, terwyl neigings in deregulasie wys dat dit tot voordeel van die verbruikers is, ten minste in die korttermyn. Alternatiewe opsies tot deregulasie moet ondersoek word. Maar totdat die oogkunde industrie hulle bydrae verhoog om die kwessies van die industrie aan te spreek, is deregulasie die beste alternatief om toeganglikheid, bekostigbaarheid, kwaliteit en gelykheid van oogsorgdienste te verbeter.
Sinclair, Andries Ignatius. "Deregulation in the South African citrus industry." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/49757.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The South African citrus industry was deregulated in 1997. Before deregulation only Outspan could export citrus from South Africa and no other export company was allowed to do so. The deregulation process was not gradual, but came suddenly and the industry changed from fully regulated to deregulated in a very short time. This sudden deregulation created a lot of uncertainty in the industry. More than one hundred new fruit export companies were established within a year after deregulation. Most of these new entrants had very little experience in exporting citrus. Many of them went bankrupt within a year or two and many citrus producers suffered considerable financial losses as a result. Producers had no experience in exports themselves and many were not qualified to choose reputable export companies to export their fruit. The face of the industry has been changed unrecognisably. In the past there was one big company exporting all the citrus from South Africa. After deregulation a lot of small to medium fruit export companies were established. These companies playa very important role in the industry as it stands today. Deregulation also opened the door for big international fruit marketing and distribution companies to enter the South African fruit business. After some years of chaos and very little reliable information available in the industry in terms of volumes produced and exported, the industry is stabilising. A number of industry bodies like the Citrus Exporters Forum (CEF) and Citrus South Africa (CSA) have been formed to represent the exporters and the producers. These bodies have formed the Joint Marketing Forum (JMF) that meets every month to discuss marketing and industry-related issues jointly. The debate with regards to deregulation rages on. Most industry role players are supportive of less regulation and free market principles. However, deregulation could have been more gradually phased in. This would have given more people, especially producers, the chance to adapt to the new environment. Most role players are of the opinion that the citrus industry is more market driven and more competitive after deregulation than before. Taking a look at the South African citrus industry in the future, there will be increased competition due to increased volume of citrus produced world wide. Producers can therefore no longer produce unwanted varieties or produce in marginal areas where the yields are low. Producers must take their destiny in their own hands and must educate themselves in the export process so that they can make the right decisions about production and exports. As a result of increased competition and lower margins the distribution chain must be as short as possible with as few middle men as possible. As a result of this producer exporters are on the increase.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die Suid Afrikaanse sitrusbedryf is in 1997 gedereguleer. Voor deregulering kon slegs Outspan sitrus uit Suid Afrika uitvoer en geen ander maatskappy is toegelaat om dit te doen nie. Die dereguleringsprosess was nie geleidelik nie, maar die industrie het van ten volle gereguleerd tot gedureguleer verander in 'n baie kort tyd. Die skielike deregulering het gelei tot groot onsekerheid in die industrie. Meer as eenhonderd nuwe vrugte uitvoermaatskappy is binne 'n jaar na deregulering gevorm. Meeste van die nuwe rolspelers het baie min ondervinding in die uitvoer van sitrus gehad. Baie het dan ook bankrot gespeel binne 'n jaar of twee en baie sitrusprodusente het groot finansiële verliese gelei as gevolg daarvan. Meeste produsente het ook geen ondervinding in uitvoere gehad nie 'en was dus nie gekwalifiseerd om betroubare uitvoermaatskappye te kies om hulle sitrus uit te voer nie. Die gesig van die industry is onherkenbaar verander. Tydens regularing was daar slegs een groot maatskappy wat alle sitrus van Suid Afrika af uitgevoer het. Na deregulering is 'n groot aantal klein tot medium vrugte uitvoermaatskappye gevorm. Hierdie maatskappye speel 'n baie belangrike rol in die industrie soos dit tans lyk. Deregulering het ook die deur vir groot internasionale vrugtebemarkings en distribusiemaatskappye oopgemaak om die Suid Afrikaanse industrie te betree. Na 'n aantal jare van chaos en baie min betroubare informasie wat beskikbaar was in terme van volume geproduseer en uitgevoer, is die industrie besig om te stabiliseer. Daar is ook 'n aantal industrieliggame soos die Sitrus Uitvoerders Forum en Sitrus Suid Afrika gevorm om die belange van uitvoerders en produsente te verteenwoordig. Hierdie liggame het die Gesamentlike Bemarkings Forum gevorm wat elke maand vergader om bemarking en ander industrie aangeleenthede gesaamentlik te bespreek. Die debad met betrekking tot deregularing is steeds aan die gang. Meeste industrierolspelers ondersteun minder regulering en vryemark beginsels. Hulle stem egter saam dat die dereguleringsproses meer geleidelik ingefaseer moes word. Dit sou produsente meer tyd gegee het om aan te pas by die nuwe omgewing. Meeste rolspelers is van die opinie dat die sitrusindustrie in Suid Afrika meer markgerig en ook meer kompeterend geword het na deregulering. In die toekoms kan verwag word dat daar meer kompetisie in die sitrusbedryf sal wees as gevolg van 'n toename in sitrusproduksie wêreldwyd in sitrusproduserende lande. Produsente kan dus nie meer ongewenste variëteite produseer of sitrus produseer in marginale areas waar opbrengste laag is nie. Produsente moet hulle toekoms in hulle eie hande neem en moet die uitvoerproses leer ken sodat hulle die regte besluite kan neem oor produksie en uitvoere. As gevolg van toenemende kompetisie en kleiner marges moet die logistiekeketting so kort en koste effektief as moontlik gehou word. As gevolg hiervan is produsente uitvoermaatskappye aan die toeneem.
Or, Tin-lun, and 柯天倫. "Review of the deregulating telecommunications business and the regulatory environment in telecommunications business." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 1998. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B31269163.
Full textCommendatore, Pasquale, and Ingrid Kubin. "Dynamic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labour markets." Inst. für Volkswirtschaftstheorie und -politik, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2005. http://epub.wu.ac.at/496/1/document.pdf.
Full textSeries: Working Papers Series "Growth and Employment in Europe: Sustainability and Competitiveness"
Chan, Chun-wah Owen, and 陳津華. "Deregulation & business opportunity: a case stydy of private residential building management industry in Hong Kong." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 1992. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B31265200.
Full textPetsikas, George. "Airline deregulation and competition in the Canadian air transport industry today, and prospects for the future." Thesis, McGill University, 1989. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59582.
Full textThe second major development was the extremely rapid process of consolidation, precipitated mainly by deregulation, into an industry dominated by two airlines; a duopoly. The implications arising from this situation for present and future competition in the Canadian air transport industry, as viewed from a market contestability perspective, need to be assessed.
Löfmark, Johan, Leo Saleh, and Daniel Zand. "Air Traffic Control in Sweden : Differences between a public and private alternative in an upcoming deregulation." Thesis, Jönköping University, JIBS, Business Administration, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-769.
Full textBackground:
In Sweden, air traffic control is currently performed in a mo-nopoly with the state owned Luftfartsverket as the only sup-plier. A deregulation process has been initiated with the ration-ale of cost reductions, both for airports and airline passengers.
Problem and purpose:
Economic arguments have been predominant for this potential deregulation and the underlying assumptions are that private al-ternatives would improve efficiency and reduce costs. This has lead the authors to identify what private alternatives would do differently than the current public operator in order to offer these benefits.
Method:
To fulfill the purpose the authors have used a qualitative ap-proach based on interviews with the current public operator as well as a new potential private alternative. In addition to this, interest organizations and regulative agencies have been con-tacted and secondary data incorporated to provide a holistic perspective.
Conclusion:
The authors have identified differences in activities between a public and private alternative that would create an advantageous effect on the market. They are: a different management of re-tirement funds, prolonged retirement age, new compensation system, altered recruitment policy, a full utilization of staff and a seizing of non-value adding activities.
Ball, Rebecca W. "Adaptation vs selection: an examination of the impact of deregulation on strategic change in U.S. banks." Diss., Virginia Tech, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40041.
Full textPh. D.
Alexandersson, Gunnar. "The accidental deregulation : essays on reforms in the Swedish bus and railway industries 1979-2009." Doctoral thesis, Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Marknadsföring, Distributionsekonomi och Industriell Dynamik (D), 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hhs:diva-999.
Full textHELTERLIN, Gilles, and Nuno RAMALHO. "How did the deregulation of air transportation in Europe foster entrepreneurial behavior and innovation in the European airline industry over the last twenty years? : Case studies: SAS Airline & Ryanair." Thesis, Umeå University, Umeå School of Business, 2007. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1224.
Full textThe dynamics of business contexts influence the way firms act in their industry. These changes can have effects in several areas within a company. Entrepreneurship and Innovation are two areas that are affected when a change in firm’s environment occurs, like Schumpeter, Shane and Drucker point. Changes in the deregulatory framework are a specific type of change that can occur. According to Entrepreneurship theories, the removal of regulatory barriers creates opportunities to different reallocation of resources that can lead to changes in market equilibrium. This study addresses this relation between deregulation and entrepreneurship-innovation in the European airline industry. With the removal of regulatory barriers, companies like SAS and Ryanair, saw opportunities to do something new and at the same time had to adapt to these “doing something new” behavior of other companies. Entrepreneurship and innovation were the answer to theses changes and the weapon to fight answers to others with this change. Considering this, our statement problem is the following:
How did the deregulation of air transportation in Europe foster entrepreneurial behavior and innovation in the European airline industry over the last twenty years? The case of SAS and Ryanair.
Our goal is to describe the process of deregulation and how firms reacted to it and to give explanations behind the relation deregulation-entrepreneurship, identifying the direct and indirect influence of deregulation in the studied companies. Furthermore, based on this investigation, we will trace possible ways on how future deregulation in Europe can foster further entrepreneurial behavior and innovation.
This thesis was conducted with a positivism scientific ideal and a deductive approach. We used a qualitative method to collect empirical data that could match with the theories we had chosen beforehand. We conducted three interviews with people inside the industry – from airlines (SAS Braathens and SAS) and from airports (LFV). The first two were used as main sources to SAS case study and the third to have a perspective of airline industry. Since we could not get any interview with Ryanair, Ryanair story book was used as main source for this case study.
Our theoretical framework consists of four different broad areas that are interrelated to each other. These areas and the respective theories integrated in them are: institutions and regulation, changes in context and strategic position.
Our study shows that EU deregulation altered the five competitive forces in European airline industry and in turn this fostered entrepreneurship and innovation, as a reaction of firms to adapt to the change in their context. The reaction of Ryanair and SAS through entrepreneurial and innovative behaviour was different due to the differences in their business model. We argue that the removal of barriers to new entrants and the increased rivalry between firms were the main forces that fostered entrepreneurship and innovation. We predict that if further EU deregulation comes (as it is the trend) this will generate more opportunities to entrepreneurship and innovation like it generated in the past.
Books on the topic "Business deregulation"
Kreidler, Mike. Deregulation of commercial products. [Olympia, Wash.]: Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner, 2001.
Find full textDeregulation and the airline business in Europe. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009.
Find full text1952-, Midttun Atle, ed. European energy industry business strategies. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001.
Find full textKent, Jeremy P. Burdens on business: The consequences of deregulation for employment. [s.l.]: typescript, 1987.
Find full textWu, Changqi. Hong Kong's business regulation in transition. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
Find full textAlbach, Horst. Deregulierung des Handwerks. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 1992.
Find full textCouncil, Insurance Research. Business attitude monitor, 2000: Commercial lines deregulation : satisfaction with insurance. Malvern, PA: Insurance Research Council, 2000.
Find full textColton, Roger D. Assessing impacts on small-business, residential, and low-income customers. [S. l.]: National Council on Competition and the Electric Industry, 1996.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business. Subcommittee on Antitrust, Impact of Deregulation, and Privatization. Impact of deregulation of the trucking industry on small businesses and small truck owner/operators: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Impact of Deregulation, and Privatization of the Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, first session, Washington, DC, October 6, 1987. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business. Subcommittee on Antitrust, Impact of Deregulation, and Privatization. Impact of deregulation and privatization: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Impact of Deregulation, and Privatization of the Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives, One hundredth Congress, first session, Washington, DC, June 3 and 11, 1987. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Business deregulation"
Midttun, Atle. "Neoliberal Deregulation." In Governance and Business Models for Sustainable Capitalism, 89–100. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315454931-6.
Full textSchultz, J. J. "Environmental Regulations and the Fertilizer Business." In Privatization and Deregulation, 121–35. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4583-1_13.
Full textBorghesi, Antonio. "City Logistics: Is Deregulation the Answer?" In Financial Environment and Business Development, 385–400. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_28.
Full textKavakli, V., and P. Loucopoulos. "Goal-driven business process analysis application in electricity deregulation." In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 305–24. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bfb0054232.
Full textBelke, Ansgar. "Macroeconomic Policies, Bureaucracy and Deregulation: The Choice of the Exchange Rate Regime." In Business Regulation and Public Policy, 1–19. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77678-1_17.
Full textKumar, Sunil, and Rachita Gulati. "Financial Deregulation in the Indian Banking Industry: Has It Improved Cost Efficiency?" In India Studies in Business and Economics, 201–36. New Delhi: Springer India, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1545-5_6.
Full textBulteel, Paul. "The Case of EURELECTRIC: the Impact of Deregulation upon EU Business Associations." In The Effectiveness of EU Business Associations, 109–14. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230629370_10.
Full textEchevarría, Santiago García, Ma Teresa Val, and Alberto Peralta. "Privatization and Deregulation of the Economy: The Challenge of a New Business Culture." In Integration in der internationalen Unternehmung, 149–69. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84490-3_7.
Full textBeltramini, Enrico. "Changes in Business Organization:." In Contesting Deregulation, 87–108. Berghahn Books, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04gps.10.
Full textWallace, Peter. "Deregulation in Jeopardy." In Business Guide to the Philippines, 91–102. Elsevier, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-981-00-7081-6.50012-0.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Business deregulation"
Choudhary, Muhammad A., Nawar Khan, Aisha Abbas, and Ali Salman. "Telecom sector deregulation, business growth and economic development." In Technology. IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2008.4599894.
Full textMuja, Armend. "Is there a European Innovation Crisis!? The impact of product and labour market deregulation." In University for Business and Technology International Conference. Pristina, Kosovo: University for Business and Technology, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.33107/ubt-ic.2014.46.
Full textTone, Yoichi, and Kunihiko Mouri. "A Concept of Energy Network Combined With Distributed Power Generation and Internet Systems." In 2002 International Joint Power Generation Conference. ASMEDC, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ijpgc2002-26130.
Full textBowes, D. "Deregulation: a great challenge for utilities but only business re-engineering and new tools will guarantee success in a new, dynamic and competitive environment." In Ninth International Conference on Metering and Tariffs for Energy Supply. IEE, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cp:19990114.
Full textRodgers, C. "Microturbine Cycle Options." In ASME Turbo Expo 2001: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/2001-gt-0552.
Full textTalipova, Amina, and Sergei Parsegov. "Evolution of Natural Gas Business Model with Deregulation, Financial Instruments, Technology Solutions, and Rising LNG Export. Comparative Study of Projects Inside the US and Abroad." In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/191532-ms.
Full textFetescu, Mircea. "High Efficiency-Coal and Gas (HE-C&G): A Hybrid Power Plant Concept Iintegrating ABB’s GT24/GT26 Gas Turbines With Conventional Steam Power Plants for Competitive Power Generation With High Dispatch Flexibility." In ASME 1997 Turbo Asia Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/97-aa-140.
Full textMohitpour, M., Trent van Egmond, and W. L. Wright. "High Pressure Gas Pipelines: Trends for the New Millennium." In 2000 3rd International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2000-164.
Full textChun Kuo, Yi, and Pei Yin Liu. "The Impact of Deregulating OBU’s Renminbi’s Business on Financing Behavior of Taiwanese Businessman in China." In Annual International Conference on Operations Research and Statistics. Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-1938_ors26.
Full textWilley, Lawrence D., James R. Maughan, J. Michael Hill, and Dennis J. Walsh. "New Steam Turbine Test Vehicle for the Verification of Improved Efficiency Power Generation Steam Turbines." In ASME 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2000-2096.
Full text