Journal articles on the topic 'British Empire'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: British Empire.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'British Empire.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Naheed Anwar. "Sir Syed Ahmad Khan’s Multifarious Activities in England." PERENNIAL JOURNAL OF HISTORY 4, no. 1 (June 24, 2023): 154–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v4i1.148.

Full text
Abstract:
Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, the British Empire surpassed all the earlier empires in territorial size, during this time period British Empire earned the illustrious title ‘the Empire which never sees a sunset’. From 1858 to 1947, known as the British Crown Raj, the entire territory encompassing India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh was under the direct rule of Britain by the Parliament working on behalf of the British Crown. During this era, a substantial number of Indians - largely professionals - went to Britain. Indian students won scholarships for pursuing higher education and vital professional qualification in the UK, subsequently entering into the established system of colonial hierarchy upon their return to India. Political activists being qualified stayed on to practice their professions in England. Businessmen went to seek economic opportunities. In such an environment, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan decided to visit Britian. As a philosopher, activist, historiographer, thinker and educationist, he was interested in exploring and observing Britain and its culture. He was the first Muslim who intended to visit Britain just to boost up the Muslim community and indeed, his visit made history. The purpose of this article is to narrate Syed Ahmad’s social, political and literary engagements during his stay in England.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sprinker, M. "British Literature and British Empire." Radical History Review 1992, no. 53 (April 1, 1992): 122–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1992-53-122.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Morgan, J. "Law's British Empire." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22, no. 4 (December 1, 2002): 729–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/22.4.729.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

LEE, SIMON. "LAW'S BRITISH EMPIRE?" Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 8, no. 2 (1988): 278–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/8.2.278.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Harper, Tobias. "The Order of the British Empire after the British Empire." Canadian Journal of History 52, no. 3 (December 2017): 509–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjh.ach.52.3.05.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Jabbar, Abdullah Hasan, and Mishaal Harb Mkhailef. "Savagery and Civilization: Joseph Conrad’s "The Heart of Darkness"." Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Educational Study 4, no. 2 (July 26, 2023): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.47616/jamres.v4i2.401.

Full text
Abstract:
This research paper highlights Joseph Conrad’s satirical portrayal of "The Heart of Darkness" and shows how the white European people, the colonizers, take their lead in the novel to be civilized enough to go over the world and civilize people. Among those people the black people of Dark Continent Africa who were marginalized in the novel and to be called ‘uncivilized’ and ‘savage’ people. Some great empires like the British Empire used the cover of the civilization so as to achieve their desires over the third world countries. Joseph Conrad in his Heart of Darkness talked about these important themes, by showing the hypocritical ways that the British Empire used to colonize the third world countries and how did they use wicked plans to convince the world with their occupation. The British Empire colonized Africa so as to exploit their main resources, especially ivory, to use them in their manufactories. Also, this study aims to show how the British Empire used the cover of religion so as to convince the world of their deeds and to make them legal. This study focuses on the real ‘savagery’ concealing under the cover of ‘civilization’ and the real darkness existing inside the veil of white men. This study is based on historical research linked with a political background of imperialism. This study comes to its conclusion by showing the wicked ways that great empires used to colonize other countries, like Great British, and their policy to spread their control.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

MACDONALD, PAUL K. "Those who forget historiography are doomed to republish it: empire, imperialism and contemporary debates about American power." Review of International Studies 35, no. 1 (January 2009): 45–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210509008328.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractA growing number of scholars, commentators, and pundits describe the contemporary US as an empire. This article argues that these authors have not paid sufficient attention to the historiography of empire and imperialism. Indeed, the historiography of the British and American empires offers important lessons for current debates including what is the appropriate definition of the American empire, what are the social and political foundations of the American Empire, and what are the consequences of the American Empire for the US and the wider world.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Wilson, James David. "The Dutch and the Second British Empire in the Early Nineteenth-Century Indian Ocean World." Journal of British Studies 58, no. 2 (April 2019): 366–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2018.179.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractDuring the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, the British Empire grew through its invasion of Dutch colonies around the Indian Ocean rim. The incursions entwined British and Dutch politics, cultures, and social networks. These developments were significant for the Dutch East Indies, but have received relatively little attention in histories of the Second British Empire. In light of recent interest in Anglo-Dutch interaction, connectivity across empires, and the uses of prosopography to question the boundaries of imperial history, this article uses Dutch biographies to interrogate the relationship between the politics of liberal reform and despotism in the Cape Colony and Java under the British. A dialectic between despotism and liberalism dominates the Second Empire's historiography. Conversely, tracing the biographies of two interstitial figures who passed between the Dutch Empire and that of Britain shows how despotism and reform were connected. The Dutch drew notions of reform from their social networks into the Cape and Java through their manipulation of loyalist rhetoric. Concurrently, the use of such rhetoric legitimized societies and controls linked to the entrenchment of autocracy. This article thus reveals links between connectivity and control in Britain's Indian Ocean empire.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Binney, Matthew. "Empire, Spectacle and the Patriot King: British Responses to the Eighteenth-Century Russian Empire." Quaestio Rossica, no. 2 (2017): 385–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/qr.2017.2.232.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bowen, H. V. "Scotland and the British Empire (Oxford History of the British Empire)." Round Table 101, no. 3 (June 2012): 276–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2012.697801.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Green, William A., and Trevor Lloyd. "Empire: The History of the British Empire." Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies 34, no. 4 (2002): 719. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4054734.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Porter, B. "Empire: The History of the British Empire." English Historical Review 117, no. 470 (February 1, 2002): 218–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/117.470.218-a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Barton, Gregory A., and Brett M. Bennett. "Decolonizing Informal Empire." Pacific Historical Review 90, no. 2 (2021): 211–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/phr.2021.90.2.211.

Full text
Abstract:
This article traces the decolonization of Britain’s informal empire over the teak trade in Thailand in the mid-twentieth century. It argues that British influence over the teak industry, which dated to the second half of the nineteenth century, began to wane in the 1920s due to the gradual nationalization of teak leases. Still, British firms and the Foreign Office remained dominant in the export industry in the 1920s and 1930s because of Britain’s lobbying and geopolitical authority. The Japanese invasion of Thailand in 1941 during the Second World War caused British firms to lose access to their leases and equipment. Bilateral negotiations between the Thai government and British firms after the war ended led to logs and leases being returned to British firms, but the Thai government did not renew long term leases in the 1950s despite protests from British business and government. The Thai elite looked to Americans for defense support, and they supported nationalization to expand Thai and Thai-Chinese economic authority. Britain’s military and economic authority in Thailand had eroded rapidly and, within a decade, British firms had lost control over Southeast Asia’s teak trade. This article is part of the “Crossroads of Indo–Pacific Environmental Histories” special issue of Pacific Historical Review.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Steve Pincus. "Reconfiguring the British Empire." William and Mary Quarterly 69, no. 1 (2012): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5309/willmaryquar.69.1.0063.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Bridge, Carl, P. J. Marshall, and Glyndwr Williams. "Introduction: A ‘British’ Empire." International History Review 12, no. 1 (February 1990): 2–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.1990.9640533.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Tignor, Robert L. "Understanding the British Empire." International History Review 34, no. 1 (March 2012): 184–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2012.667631.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

El-Enany, Nadine. "The next British empire." IPPR Progressive Review 25, no. 1 (June 2018): 30–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/newe.12089.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Potter, Matthew C. "BRITISH ART AND EMPIRE." Media History 13, no. 1 (March 26, 2007): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688800701264876.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

BOWEN, H. V. "The British Empire, I." History 79, no. 256 (June 1994): 263–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-229x.1994.tb01600.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

BARRON, T. J. "The British Empire, II." History 79, no. 256 (June 1994): 267–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-229x.1994.tb01601.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Hedinger, Daniel, and Nadin Heέ. "Transimperial History - Connectivity, Cooperation and Competition." Journal of Modern European History 16, no. 4 (November 2018): 429–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/1611-8944-2018-4-429.

Full text
Abstract:
Transimperial History – Connectivity, Cooperation and Competition This Forum article argues that a turn in empire history is needed, one which we label «transimperial». Whereas national history has been transnationalized in recent decades, the history of empires has, by and large, remained nationalized. Since transnational history, global history, postcolonial studies and new imperial history all offer an abundance of tools to tear down imperial borders and deconstruct nationalized narratives, the moment seems to have come for a shift, namely for what we call a transimperial approach to imperial history. We seek to show how such an approach makes it possible to dynamize and decentralize the history of empires both on the level of empirical research and historiographical narratives. By including marginalized empires we offer a way to overcome British centrism of empire studies. On the methodological level, this contribution seeks to discuss imperial competition, cooperation and connectivity not as separate phenomena but as entangled processes. The point is not to analytically isolate cooperation or competition but to shed light on how they reinforced each other and how connectivity plays into this. The article shows that a key to establishing a transimperial approach is to consider time and space together by focusing on the transformative aspect of competition, cooperation and connectivity in spaces in-between empires. In this article, we highlight transimperial histories avant la lettre, on which such an approach can rely. Finally, we discuss how this approach helps challenge essentializing master narratives in empire studies, be it the one in which the British Empire serves as a model for other empires or the one where the Japanese empire is seen as a mimicry of European imperialism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Black, Jeremy. "The British End of the British Empire." International History Review 41, no. 1 (January 2, 2019): 230–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2018.1546798.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Ünlüönen, Sezen. "Ottoman Empire." Victorian Literature and Culture 51, no. 3 (2023): 471–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1060150323000335.

Full text
Abstract:
In the nineteenth century, Britain had intense political, economic, and cultural relations with the Ottoman Empire: they were political allies during the Crimean War; for several decades, British creditors ran the Ottoman economy via Ottoman Public Debt Administration; many Ottoman cultural institutions, such as the Imperial Museum, were modeled after their British counterparts. Given this interconnected history, this essay argues that the Ottoman Empire could provide a rich field of inquiry for the Victorian studies as the field tries to “undiscipline” itself.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Sexton, Jay. "The British Empire after A.G. Hopkins's American Empire." Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 49, no. 3 (May 4, 2021): 459–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2021.1920808.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Mukherjee, M. "The British Empire in India: A Liberal Empire?" Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 34, no. 3 (January 1, 2014): 625–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-2826217.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Share, Michael. "GHOSTS OF AN EMPIRE: BRITISH LEGACIES IN ASIA." Journal of International Analytics, no. 1 (March 28, 2018): 45–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2018-0-1-45-51.

Full text
Abstract:
One hundred years ago, the British Empire controlled a quarter of the world’s area and population. Today only a dozen tiny islands remain of this once great empire. However, the British left a huge and permanent legacy behind in terms of the English language, a rule of law, banking, Protestantism, team sports, and parliamentary institutions. While some historians, notably Niall Ferguson, hold that the British legacy was a positive one, most historians believe the legacy was a negative one. Instead of being liberal and democratic, the British Empire was anti-democratic. Instead of fostering free trade, the Empire was protectionist toward the outside world. Notions of class and hierarchy were crucial. This article examines the British legacy in two former colonies in Asia--one huge and one tiny: India and Hong Kong. While in Hong Kong, Britain’s legacy has been fairly positive, in India it is quite negative. The British Empire was not a prelude to a modern 21st century Western world of democracy, multiculturalism, and liberal economics. The British Empire was something different– snobbery, hierarchy, and individualism, and must be understood on its own terms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Paul, Kathleen. "“British Subjects” and “British Stock”: Labour's Postwar Imperialism." Journal of British Studies 34, no. 2 (April 1995): 233–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/386075.

Full text
Abstract:
If Conservative Party leader Winston Churchill fought World War II determined not to be the prime minister who lost the Empire, Clement Attlee, Ernest Bevin, and Herbert Morrison, who as Labour members of the Coalition government served with him, were equally determined to hold on to Empire once peace was won. The Empire/Commonwealth offered both political and economic benefits to Labour. Politically, the Commonwealth provided substance for Britain's pretensions to a world power role equal in stature to the new superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union. For this claim to be effective, however, the Commonwealth needed to be demographically strong and firmly united under British leadership. Economically, imperial preferences and the sterling area offered a financial buffer against Britain's true plight of accumulated wartime debts and major infrastructural damage and neglect. Receiving over 40 percent of British exports and providing substantial, and in the case of Australia and New Zealand, dollar-free imports of meat, wheat, timber, and dairy produce, the Commonwealth seemed a logical body on which the United Kingdom could draw for financial support. In short, postwar policy makers believed preservation of the Empire/Commonwealth to be a necessary first step in domestic and foreign reconstruction.Yet in 1945, a variety of circumstances combined to make the task of imperial preservation one of reconstitution rather than simple maintenance. First, it seemed that, just at the moment when Britain needed them most, some of the strongest and oldest members of the Commonwealth appeared to be moving away.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Jyoti Gogoi, Bhaskar. "Deviance and Empire: Major Anthony G. McCall’s Lushai Chrysalis." transcript: An e-Journal of Literary and Cultural Studies 03, no. 01 (2023): 58–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.53034/transcript.2023.v03.n01.004.

Full text
Abstract:
The British colonial empire was one of the largest and most influential empires in history. It spanned across various parts of the world, including territories in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and the Pacific. Throughout its existence, the British Empire faced numerous acts of defiance and resistance from the indigenous populations of the colonized regions. In addition, the annals of history are replete with acts of defiance that originated within the colonized territories themselves, rather than from external forces. One such act of defiance was by Major Anthony G. McCall, who was appointed as the Superintendent-in-Charge of Lushai Hills (present Mizoram) during the 1930s and 1940s. McCall broke with protocol to lambast the policies of the British administration leading to his removal in May 1943. The events of his life in Lushai Hills have been documented in the book Lushai Chrysalis or Lushai Land of Tranquility and Upheaval (1949). The book is not only an important ethnographic document in the study of Northeast Indian history but it also gives insight into the personality of McCall and other ICS officers of the British administration. This, in turn, provides better insight into the working of the British colonial structure and gives us alternative viewpoints to what is normally seen as a monolithic one.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Macinnes, Allan I., and Jean-François Dunyach. "Introduction: Enlightenment and Empire." Journal of Scottish Historical Studies 38, no. 1 (May 2018): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/jshs.2018.0230.

Full text
Abstract:
The Enlightenment is here located in the global transmission of goods, people and ideas. The Scottish participation in Empires is explored through four distinctive themes. The first scrutinises how Whig and Jacobite perspectives on Enlightenment affected Scottish engagement with the British and other Empires. The second relates to the impact of Enlightenment thinking on the reputed decline of Spanish Empire on Scottish commercial access to Latin America. The third deals with enlightened critiques of Empire that were not necessarily sustained by observation and practical experience. The fourth explores through case studies the application of Enlightenment in North America and India. Most of the contributions were primarily given as papers to the Eighteenth Century Scottish Studies Society Conference held in Paris Sorbonne in July 2013 with the Adam Smith Society and the Centre Roland Mousnier (Sorbonne) on ‘Scotland, Europe and Empire in the Age of Adam Smith and Beyond’. This volume is published with the financial support of the Centre Roland Mousnier, Sorbonne University.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Zernetska, O. "The Rethinking of Great Britain’s Role: From the World Empire to the Nation State." Problems of World History, no. 9 (November 26, 2019): 129–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.46869/2707-6776-2019-9-6.

Full text
Abstract:
In the article, it is stated that Great Britain had been the biggest empire in the world in the course of many centuries. Due to synchronic and diachronic approaches it was detected time simultaneousness of the British Empire’s development in the different parts of the world. Different forms of its ruling (colonies, dominions, other territories under her auspice) manifested this phenomenon.The British Empire went through evolution from the First British Empire which was developed on the count mostly of the trade of slaves and slavery as a whole to the Second British Empire when itcolonized one of the biggest states of the world India and some other countries of the East; to the Third British Empire where it colonized countries practically on all the continents of the world. TheForth British Empire signifies the stage of its decomposition and almost total down fall in the second half of the 20th century. It is shown how the national liberation moments starting in India and endingin Africa undermined the British Empire’s power, which couldn’t control the territories, no more. The foundation of the independent nation state of Great Britain free of colonies did not lead to lossof the imperial spirit of its establishment, which is manifested in its practical deeds – Organization of the British Commonwealth of Nations, which later on was called the Commonwealth, Brexit and so on.The conclusions are drawn that Great Britain makes certain efforts to become a global state again.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Southcott, Jane, and Angela Hao-Chun Lee. "Imperialism in School Music: Common Experiences in Two Different Cultures." International Journal of Music Education os-40, no. 1 (May 2003): 28–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/025576140304000104.

Full text
Abstract:
Empire, imperialism and colonialism are all terms that defy easy definition. The variety of imperial regimes and colonial situations demonstrates a “patchwork quilt of ad hoc adaptations to particular circumstance” (Osterhammel, 1997, p. 4). However, this paper does not seek to define such phenomena but to explore their effects on the school music that existed within such regimes. Japanese and British imperialism evolved in distinct ways, but the enactment of imperialism in school music was, ultimately, similar. Two different examples of early twentieth century empires will be considered – Taiwan, a colony of Japan between 1895 and 1945, and the British colonies that were to become Australia with their Federation in 1901 (Parsons, 1999). Central to the notion of empire was the imperial ruler, either emperor or empress. Empire and ruler were celebrated by school children in song and pageant, demonstrating the use of music as a vehicle of messages to be inculcated in the young participants.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Lyman, Igor, and Victoria Konstantinova. "Connecting the British, Russian and German Empires: Th e Family of British Vice-consul John Greaves at the Forefront of Modernization in South Ukraine." Ukraina Moderna 25 (2018): 194–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/uam.2018.25.1078.

Full text
Abstract:
John Greaves, a British subject, was an important actor of modernization in the Russian Empire. He arrived at the port of Berdyansk as a representative of the British company Clayton & Shuttleworth, and he established a plant of agricultural machinery there, which became the largest plant of this kind in Europe. In 1877 Greaves offered himself for the position of German vice- consul in Berdyansk. In 1907 he became a vice-consul of the British Empire, and kept this post until 1918. Greaves and his family became an example of a new vector of actors’ mobility and new practices of socialization, formed under the influence of modernization. These stimulated the emergence of new forms of loyalty, as well as the combination of economics and politics. Special attention is paid to the Greaves’ family and business ties with the Germans, as well as on his personal experience of contacts with the German authorities, which is particularly interesting in the context of the competitive struggle between the British, Russian and German empires.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Holland, R. F. "The British Empire, 1558–1983." International Affairs 61, no. 3 (1985): 508. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2618708.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Birns, Nicholas. "Capitalization in “the British Empire”." Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 118, no. 2 (March 2003): 342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/003081203x67929.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Kendle, John. "Ireland and the British Empire." History: Reviews of New Books 33, no. 2 (January 2005): 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03612759.2005.10526491.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Harrison, Mark. "Science and the British Empire." Isis 96, no. 1 (March 2005): 56–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/430678.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Gillen D’Arcy Wood. "The British Empire Live Onstage." Eighteenth Century 50, no. 4 (2009): 371–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ecy.0.0052.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Hopkins, A. G. "Accounting for the British Empire." Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 16, no. 2 (January 1988): 234–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03086538808582759.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Pinch, V. "Bhakti and the British Empire." Past & Present 179, no. 1 (May 1, 2003): 159–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/past/179.1.159.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Fitzpatrick, David. "Ireland and the British Empire." English Historical Review CXXI, no. 490 (February 1, 2006): 239–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cej030.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Bothwell, R. "Canada and the British Empire." English Historical Review CXXIV, no. 510 (September 17, 2009): 1191–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cep245.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Haynes, Douglas M., and D. George Boyce. "Decolonisation and the British Empire." Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies 32, no. 4 (2000): 715. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4053692.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Hamilton, Douglas. "The British Seaborne Empire (review)." Journal of Military History 69, no. 2 (2005): 545–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jmh.2005.0098.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Koot, G. M. "British economists and the Empire." History of Political Economy 17, no. 3 (September 1, 1985): 491–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-3-491.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Gilmore, John. "Tibullus and the British Empire." Translator 5, no. 1 (January 1999): 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1999.10799031.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Fedorowich, Kent. "Canada and the British Empire." Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 37, no. 4 (November 19, 2009): 619–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03086530903327127.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Owen, Nicholas. "Democratisation and the British Empire." Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 47, no. 5 (September 3, 2019): 974–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2019.1677343.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Holdsworth, E. T. "The British Empire Exhibition 1924." Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists 40, no. 12 (October 22, 2008): 412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.1924.tb01245.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Jiang, Zhiyan. "An Analysis of the Financial Gains from Colonialism of Great Britain." Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences 49, no. 1 (December 1, 2023): 88–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/49/20230479.

Full text
Abstract:
The British Empire is known for its large territory ranging all the way from the Americas to Oceania, with dozens of colonies that brought the empire great wealth and capacity to industrialize and mass produce. Based on data and information on the amount of British colonial production, this article focuses on calculations and estimations of the total colonial gain of the empire above. By estimating the amount of production in selected significant colonies, and then converting the results into the desired unit of measurement, a calculated value of colonial wealth can be achieved. The resulting values reveal that the British Empire is estimated to have generated more than 35 trillion British pounds, 56 million pounds of tobacco, 54 million tons of sugar, 173 million tons of rubber, 39 million tons of wool, and 26 million Terawatt hours of oil. Through calculations of the total colonial gains of the British Empire, the effect of colonization on the mother country and its influence on the modern world can be more easily and directly seen.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Nataliya, Dobryakova. "Foreign military intervention in the Caucasus in 1918-1920: the Ottoman, German and British empires." Kavkazologiya 2022, no. 4 (December 31, 2022): 120–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.31143/2542-212x-2022-4-120-128.

Full text
Abstract:
The article examines the topics related to the armed intervention of three empires - the Ottoman, German and British on the territory of the Caucasus in 1918-1920. The reasons why these states implemented their foreign policy in the Northern Caucasus and Transcaucasian during the First World War and immediately after it are given. It is proved that the three empires had completely different motivations for invading the territory of the former Russian Empire in the Caucasus re-gion. If the Ottoman Empire first of all hatched revanchist plans to return the region that once be-longed to them to its state, using pan-Islamism and pan-Turkism as leverage, then the German Empire wanted to join the economic exploitation of the Caucasus, primarily the Baku oil fields. It is concluded that the most large-scale military intervention came from Great Britain, which was due to extensive pre-war investments in the oil industry of the Caucasus and, in this regard, the desire to protect their positions in this region, including by military means.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography