Academic literature on the topic 'Breast prostheses'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Breast prostheses.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Breast prostheses"
Lee, J. "Breast prostheses." BMJ 302, no. 6767 (January 5, 1991): 43–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.302.6767.43.
Full textShin, Kristina, Kaoru Leung, Fred Han, and Jiao Jiao. "Thermal and moisture control performance of different mastectomy bras and external breast prostheses." Textile Research Journal 90, no. 7-8 (October 22, 2019): 824–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040517519881815.
Full textGardner, Kirsten E. "Hiding the Scars: A History of Post-Mastectomy Breast Prostheses, 1945–2000." Enterprise & Society 1, no. 3 (June 2000): 565–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/es/1.3.565.
Full textHojan, Katarzyna, and Faustyna Manikowska. "Can the Weight of an External Breast Prosthesis Influence Trunk Biomechanics during Functional Movement in Postmastectomy Women?" BioMed Research International 2017 (2017): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9867694.
Full textOʼBrien, Jan. "History of Breast Prostheses." Plastic Surgical Nursing 19, no. 2 (1999): 59–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006527-199919020-00003.
Full textOʼBrien, Jan. "History of Breast Prostheses." Plastic Surgical Nursing 19, no. 2 (1996): 59–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006527-199601920-00003.
Full textFowler, Marjorie R., Cherie-Ann O. Nathan, and Fleurette Abreo. "Synovial Metaplasia, A Specialized Form of Repair." Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 126, no. 6 (June 1, 2002): 727–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/2002-126-0727-smasfo.
Full textFaivre, Jacques. "Plasty Prostheses: A New Approach." American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery 9, no. 4 (December 1992): 347–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074880689200900409.
Full textSánchez Rubio, N., B. Lannegrand Menéndez, M. Duque Muñoz, M. Montes Fernández, and M. J. Ciudad Fernández. "Uncommon complications of breast prostheses." Radiología (English Edition) 62, no. 4 (July 2020): 266–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.01.010.
Full textVinci, Valeriano, Costanzo Domenico, Maione Luca, Giannasi Silvia, Veronesi Alessandra, Catania Barbara, Bandi Valeria, et al. "The evolution of breast prostheses." Breast Journal 26, no. 9 (July 2020): 1801–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13954.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Breast prostheses"
Lewis, Reaby Linda, and n/a. "Post-mastectomy self-perceptions and breast restoration decision- making in women who wear external breast prostheses and women who have had breast reconstructions : implications for health professionals." University of Canberra. Applied Science, 1996. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20061113.091439.
Full textAzevedo, Janice Campos de. "Segurança biológica de implantes mamários de silicone: interrelação entre processos esterilizantes e biocompatibilidade." Universidade de São Paulo, 2004. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/9/9139/tde-14062016-182258/.
Full textSilicone breast implants have been widely used for mammary augmentation and reconstruction surgery. Biological safety of these implants can be damaged by sterilization methods. This study consisted of the biocompatibility assessment of breast implants through cell viability, employing the agar diffusion test and neutral red uptake. Four silicone breast implants were tested: smooth, textured, polyurethane covered silicone gel breast implant and textured saline-filled breast implant. Sterilization methods comprised dry-heat, ethylene oxide and γ-radiation. Detection of bacterial endotoxins employing LAL test and gel bleed was also performed. The three methods of sterilization revealed equally efficacious, through the sterility confirmation of implants employing methodology described in 27th edition of United States Pharmacopeia. At the same way the leveis of bacterial endotoxins of implants accorded with the pharmacopeial requirements. In theevaluation of biocompatibility ali the implants, independently of the sterilization process used, showed no cytotoxicity signals. The results of gel bleed revealed a higher migration rate from the smooth implants in comparison with the textured and polyurethane-covered implants sterilized by dry-heat. When was compared the gel migration of smooth implants sterilized by dry-heat and ethylene oxide, was obtained a higher rate of gel bleed of those implants sterilized by ethylene oxide. The different evaluations performed in this study comprised biological, chemical and physical aspects, that are relevant to assure a good quality product and by having maintained the characteristics of biocompatibility, resulted in the biological safety on this kind of implant.
Uushona, Ndeshihafela Vera. "The effect of silicone gel breast prosthesis on the electron beam dose distribution." Thesis, University of Limpopo (Medunsa), 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/253.
Full textIntroduction The primary role of breast cancer treatment with radiation is to deliver a sufficient radiation dose to the cancer cells without unduly causing biological damage to the healthy tissues. For over 50 years, electron beam therapy has been an important modality for providing an accurate dose of radiation to superficial cancers and disease and for limiting the dose to underlying normal tissues and structures in particular to boost the dose to the tumour bed and surgical scars after mastectomy. The Monte Carlo code MCNP5 was used to determine the effect of silicone gel breast prosthesis on the electron beam dose distribution. Materials and Method Percentage depth dose curves (PDD) for 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV electron energies along the electron central axis depth dose distributions in a water phantom and with silicone prosthesis immersed in a water phantom were simulated using MCNP5. In order to establish the accuracy of the MCNP5 code, the depth dose curves obtained using MCNP5 were compared against the measured depth dose curves obtained from the Varian 2100C linear accelerator. The simulated depth dose curves with silicone prosthesis immersed in water were compared to the measured depth dose curves with the vi silicone prosthesis in water. The dose at the interface of the prosthesis with water was measured using thermoluminiscent dosimeters. Results The simulated and measured depth dose curve and the investigated dosimetric parameters are within 2%. Simulations in the presence of silicone showed a decrease in dose as the at the interface as the beam passes from the prosthesis to water for most energies however, for 15 MeV beam there is an increase in dose at the interface between the prosthesis and water and this was verified by physical measurements. Conclusion There were good correlations between the measured and MCNP simulated depth dose curve. Differences were in order of 2%. Small deviations occurred due to the fact that the simulations assumed a monoenergetic beam that exits the accelerator head, while in the measured results the beam exiting from the accelerator head includes scatted radiation from the collimators and the applicator. The presence of the prosthesis does not perturb the electron beam central axis depth dose curve however, the 15 MeV beam enhanced the dose in front of the interface between the prosthesis and water. Despite the limitations mentioned above MCNP5 results agree reasonably with the measured results. Hence, MCNP5 can be very useful in simulating electron percentage depth dose data.
Chen, Cheng-Feng, and 陳呈峰. "Studies on risk factors of infection and impact on oncological outcome in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction among breast cancer patients." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/4h4cz9.
Full text國立陽明大學
公共衛生研究所
105
Part 1: Risk of infection is associated more with drain duration than daily drainage volume in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction: a cohort study Background: In prosthesis-based breast reconstruction, drains are used to prevent seroma formation and to reduce the risk of infection. However, prolonged drainage increases the risk of ascending infection. Although the volume often accepted for drain removal is <30 ml per day, the optimal timing to remove the drain for best clinical outcome remains controversial. Methods: We did a retrospective cohort study of 569 patients of prosthesis-based breast reconstruction with infection rate as the outcome variable; drain duration and last daily drainage volume as the main independent variables. Data on age, smoking history, diabetes mellitus history, body mass index, breast weight, tissue expander size, drain size, number of retrieved lymph nodes, tumor size, number of metastatic lymph nodes, tumor stage, mastectomy type, reconstruction type, submuscular implantation, skin defect, operative time, duration of antibiotics use, chemotherapy ,and radiotherapy were collected as covariates. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding. Results: The total infection rate was 5.1% (29/569). The daily drainage volume ≥30ml/day at the time of drain removal was not found associated with increased infection rate (p=.32). Of the various cutoff values of last daily drainage volume, none was found to be a determinant for drain removal where the risk of infection was concerned. By contrast, drain duration over 21 days significantly increased infection rate (p=.001). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed an increase of 76.2% in the infection rate with each additional week of drain retention (p=.001). Breast weight also had a significant influence on risk of infection. Chemotherapy and drain size showed borderline effect on risk of infection whereas the last daily drainage volume was not associated with risk of infection Conclusions: In summary, our study revealed that drain duration, rather than the last daily drainage volume, significantly affects the infection rate in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. We recommend that the drain is better removed no longer than 3 weeks postoperatively and can be removed as early as postoperative day 7, even when the drainage is over 30 ml in a 24 hour period. Part II: Does prosthesis-based breast reconstruction affect postmastectomy radiotherapy? A clinical outcome-based study. Abstract: Background: In the last five decades, there has been significant advancement of breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer care. There has been concern that breast reconstruction may affect the efficacy of postmastectomy radiotherapy. This however, has not been proven by clear clinical evidence. Methods: By comparing the locoregional recurrence rates between those with and without prosthesis-based breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiotherapy, a retrospective cohort study of the breast cancer patients was done. Multivariate survival analysis was used to control the confounding factors. Results: Between 1998 and 2011, 1015 patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy were identified. Among them, 111 patients (study group) had prosthesis-based breast reconstruction and the other 904 did not have breast reconstruction (control group). Thirty four out of 904 (3.8%) patients in the control group and four out of 111 (3.6%) patients in the study group developed locoregional recurrence. Multivariate survival analysis found no significant difference both in locoregional recurrence free survival (Hazard ratio = 0.852, P-value = 0.771) and in overall survival (Hazard ratio = 1.317, P-value = 0.246) between control group and study group. Conclusions: There is no statistically significant difference in the locoregional recurrence free survival or overall survival between breast cancer patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy with and without prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. Although postmastectomy radiotherapy adversely impacts the surgical and cosmetic outcome of breast reconstruction, the oncologic outcome of postmastectomy radiotherapy is not significantly influenced by prosthesis-based breast reconstruction.
Books on the topic "Breast prostheses"
Branch, Ontario Ministry of Health Assistive Devices. Breast prostheses. Toronto, Ont: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1990.
Find full textH, Smith David, ed. The silicone breast implant story: Communication and uncertainty. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
Find full textInformed consent. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
Find full textByrne, John A. Informed consent. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
Find full textZuckweiler, Rebecca L. Living in the postmastectomy body: Learning to live in and love your body again. Point Roberts, WA: Hartley & Marks, 1998.
Find full textInvestigations, United States Congress House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and. The Bjork-Shiley heart valve, earn as you learn: Shiley Inc.'s breach of the honor system and FDA's failure in medical device regulation : a staff report. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1990.
Find full text(Editor), James N. Parker, and Philip M. Parker (Editor), eds. Breast Prosthesis: A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, And Annotated Research Guide To Internet References. Icon Health Publications, 2004.
Find full textP, Gorczyca David, and Brenner R. James, eds. The augmented breast: Radiologic and clinical perspectives. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1997.
Find full textGorczyca, David P., and R. James Brenner. The Augmented Breast: Radiologic and Clinical Perspectives. Thieme Medical Publishers, 1997.
Find full textD, Reams Bernard, United States. Food and Drug Administration. General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel., and United States. Food and Drug Administration. General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel. Meeting, eds. Transcript of the panel meeting on November 12, 13, 14, 1991 on the topic of breast implants. Buffalo, NY: W.S. Hein, 1992.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Breast prostheses"
Roth, Forrest S., David J. Gray, and Christian E. Paletta. "Breast Prostheses." In The Bionic Human, 231–54. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_12.
Full textErfon, João, Claudio Mauricio M. Rodrigues, and Guilherme Teles. "Mastopexy With and Without Prostheses." In Breast Surgery, 699–706. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_58.
Full textMiró, Arnaldo. "Augmentation Mastoplasty Using Polyurethane-Covered Prostheses." In Breast Surgery, 633–44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_52.
Full textCrompvoets, Samantha. "Practices and Prostheses." In Breast Cancer and the Post-Surgical Body, 95–120. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230599789_4.
Full textBranco, Lucia Regina, and José Aguiomar Foggiatto. "External Breast Prostheses: Brazilian Performance Parameters." In Advances in Ergonomics in Design, 498–505. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_50.
Full textHardt, N. S., J. A. Emery, G. LaTorre, C. Batich, and W. E. Winter. "Macrophage-Silicone Interactions in Women with Breast Prostheses." In Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 245–52. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85226-8_24.
Full textPetit, J. Y., M. Rietjens, C. Garusi, and D. Capko. "Primary and Secondary Breast Reconstruction with Special Emphasis on the Use of Prostheses." In Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer V, 169–75. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79278-6_19.
Full textRicciardi, C., A. Gubitosi, G. Lanzano, G. Pieretti, G. Improta, E. Crisci, and G. A. Ferraro. "The Use of Six Sigma to Assess Two Prostheses for Immediate Breast Reconstruction." In 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, 1112–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64610-3_125.
Full textRietjens, Mario, Mario Casales Schorr, and Visnu Lohsiriwat. "Case61 Prosthesis Substitution for Ruptured Prosthesis." In Atlas of Breast Reconstruction, 533–39. Milano: Springer Milan, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5519-3_66.
Full textBratu, Ion Tiberiu, Shruti Kaushal, and Zorin Crainiceanu. "Breast Reconstruction Using Becker Prosthesis." In Breast Reconstruction, 371–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18726-6_32.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Breast prostheses"
Montejo Maillo, Beatriz, Alonso Blaya San, Pedro Armisén Bobo, M. ª. Esther Montero Moreno, Fernando Blaya Haro, and Juan A. Juanes. "Methodology of custom design and manufacturing of 3D external breast prostheses∗." In TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436586.
Full textJian, Liu, Guo Jufeng, Hu Shufang, Nie Shijiao, Chen Qiong, and Wang Shuying. "Abstract P6-14-10: A retrospective study of peri-prosthesis infection after prosthesis based breast reconstruction in a single breast center in east China and impact of an evidence-based protocol." In Abstracts: 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 10-14, 2019; San Antonio, Texas. American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p6-14-10.
Full textHuang, Naisi, Mengying Liu, and Jiong Wu. "Abstract P2-14-11: Antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthesis-based mammoplasty: A systematic review." In Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 9-13, 2014; San Antonio, TX. American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p2-14-11.
Full textOh, Hee-Kyoung, and Hee-Sun Oh. "Subjective Sensation and Objective Body Physiology Responses of Breast Prosthesis in Dry and Wet States among Korean Women without a History of Breast Cancer." In Aceh International Nursing Conference. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0008394100210029.
Full textFountain, Thomas W. R., and Steven W. Day. "Design and Particle Image Velocimetry Investigation of a Turbulent Mini-Jet Hemolysis Testing Apparatus." In ASME 2008 6th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels. ASMEDC, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icnmm2008-62320.
Full textLai, Hung-Wen, Shou-Tung Chen, and Dar-Ren Chen. "Abstract P1-20-12: Robotic versus conventional or endoscopic-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer- A case control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcomes, patient-reported aesthetic results, and medical cost." In Abstracts: 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 10-14, 2019; San Antonio, Texas. American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p1-20-12.
Full text