Bibliographies: 'BRAF35'

1

Rugerio-Martínez, Claudia Ivette, Daniel Ramos, Abel Segura-Olvera, et al. "Dp71 Point Mutations Induce Protein Aggregation, Loss of Nuclear Lamina Integrity and Impaired Braf35 and Ibraf Function in Neuronal Cells." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 19 (2022): 11876. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911876.

Full text

Abstract:

Dystrophin Dp71 is the most abundant product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene in the nervous system, and mutations impairing its function have been associated with the neurodevelopmental symptoms present in a third of DMD patients. Dp71 is required for the clustering of neurotransmitter receptors and the neuronal differentiation of cultured cells; nonetheless, its precise role in neuronal cells remains to be poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed the effect of two pathogenic DMD gene point mutations on the Dp71 function in neurons. We engineered C272Y and E299del mutations to express GFP-tagged Dp71 protein variants in N1E-115 and SH-SY5Y neuronal cells. Unexpectedly, the ectopic expression of Dp71 mutants resulted in protein aggregation, which may be mechanistically caused by the effect of the mutations on Dp71 structure, as predicted by protein modeling and molecular dynamics simulations. Interestingly, Dp71 mutant variants acquired a dominant negative function that, in turn, dramatically impaired the distribution of different Dp71 protein partners, including β-dystroglycan, nuclear lamins A/C and B1, the high-mobility group (HMG)-containing protein (BRAF35) and the BRAF35-family-member inhibitor of BRAF35 (iBRAF). Further analysis of Dp71 mutants provided evidence showing a role for Dp71 in modulating both heterochromatin marker H3K9me2 organization and the neuronal genes’ expression, via its interaction with iBRAF and BRAF5.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Mi LEE, Young, and Wankee KIM. "Association of human kinesin superfamily protein member 4 with BRCA2-associated factor 35." Biochemical Journal 374, no. 2 (2003): 497–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj20030452.

Full text

Abstract:

A large portion of human kinesin superfamily protein member 4 (KIF4) is associated with the nuclear matrix during the interphase, while a small portion is found in the cytoplasm. During mitosis, it is associated with chromosomes throughout the entire process. In the present study, we identified a protein that interacts with KIF4 using a yeast two-hybrid system, co-immunoprecipitation and co-fractionation. This protein is BRCA2-associated factor 35 (BRAF35) containing a non-specific DNA binding high-mobility-group domain and a kinesin-like coiled-coil domain. It appeared that the interaction between the two proteins occurs through their respective α-helical coiled-coil domains. The co-fractionation experiment revealed that KIF4 and BRAF35 were present in a complex of approx. 540 kDa. The composition and biological significance of this complex should be studied further.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Hakimi, M. A., D. A. Bochar, J. Chenoweth, W. S. Lane, G. Mandel, and R. Shiekhattar. "A core-BRAF35 complex containing histone deacetylase mediates repression of neuronal-specific genes." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, no. 11 (2002): 7420–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.112008599.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Zanchetta, Melania E., Luisa M. R. Napolitano, Danilo Maddalo, and Germana Meroni. "The E3 ubiquitin ligase MID1/TRIM18 promotes atypical ubiquitination of the BRCA2-associated factor 35, BRAF35." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1864, no. 10 (2017): 1844–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.07.014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Ceballos-Chavez, M., S. Rivero, P. Garcia-Gutierrez, et al. "Control of neuronal differentiation by sumoylation of BRAF35, a subunit of the LSD1-CoREST histone demethylase complex." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, no. 21 (2012): 8085–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121522109.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Lee, Belinda, Angelyn Anton, Margaret Lee, et al. "Examining progression-free survival in first- and second-line treatment for BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)." Journal of Clinical Oncology 35, no. 4_suppl (2017): 728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.728.

Full text

Abstract:

728 Background: BRAF mutated (BRAFm) CRC represents ~10% of all CRC and is associated with significantly poorer prognosis. However, responses to chemotherapy do still occur. Some data suggest that the poor prognosis associated with BRAFm CRC is dominated by substantially poorer second line PFS (PFS2), whereas first line PFS (PFS1) was similar for both BRAFm and BRAF wildtype (BRAFwt) CRC. Using a large multicenter dataset, our study aimed to examine PFS1 and PFS2 in BRAFm versus BRAFwt CRC. Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) database was interrogated. PFS was calculated and compared in patients with BRAFm versus BRAFwt CRC. Median survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Results: TRACC identified 523 CRC patients with known BRAF mutation status, who received first-line chemotherapy: 53 (10%) were BRAFm, while 470 (90%) were BRAFwt. At the time of data analysis, only 231 (44%) CRC patients had received second-line chemotherapy, of which 21 (9%) were BRAFm and 210 (91%) were BRAFwt. PFS1 analyses demonstrated significantly poorer survival in the BRAFm population (Median 7.8mo versus 11.5mo, HR 1.72, p = 0.0026). PFS2 analyses revealed similar findings for the BRAFm population, albeit non-significant due to smaller numbers (Median 5.5mo versus 7.7mo, HR1.26, p = 0.44). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that BRAFm CRC was associated with poorer PFS in both first- and second-line settings. Additional analyses will be performed to examine the impact of different treatment strategies and other clinicopathological features.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Osterlund, Pia J., Emerik Osterlund, Aki Uutela, et al. "Resectability, conversion and resections rates, and outcomes in RAS&BRAF wildtype (wt), RAS mutant (mt) and BRAFmt metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) subgroups in the prospective Finnish RAXO-study." Journal of Clinical Oncology 39, no. 15_suppl (2021): 3532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3532.

Full text

Abstract:

3532 Background: Outcomes of metastasectomy varies with RAS and BRAF-status, but the effect on resectability, conversion and resection rates has not been extensively studied. Methods: The prospective Finnish RAXO study (NCT01531621) included 1086 patients 2011-2018 (Osterlund et al TLRHE 2021, Isoniemi et al BJS 2021) of which 906 were included in this secondary endpoint analysis. Excluded had missing KRAS/ NRAS/ BRAF-V600E test, were untreatable or had an atypical BRAF mutation. We studied repeated centralized resectability assessment, conversion and resectability rates in mCRC, and overall survival (OS) after resection and/or local ablative therapy (LAT) and systemic therapy. Results: Included were 289 RAS& BRAFwt, 529 RASmt (overrepresented) and 88 BRAFmt, with median age 65.8/66.1/66.9 years. Demographics per RAS& BRAFwt, RASmt and BRAFmt showed significant differences in male proportion (68/61/39%), ECOG PS 2-3 groups (16/14/25%), primary tumour location (right colon 16/30/69%, left colon 47/34/17%, rectum 38/36/14%), but not for Charlson comorbidity index, BMI, resection of primary, synchronous presentation or adjuvant therapy (Bonferroni corrected Chi-square). Metastatic profile was different for liver (78/74/61% per RAS& BRAFwt, RASmt and BRAFmt), lung (24/35/28%) and peritoneal (15/15/32%) metastases, but not for lymph nodes or other sites, nor for number of metastatic sites (1 in 53/54/52%). Upfront resectability rates were different with 32/29/15% for RAS& BRAFwt, RASmt and BRAFmt, respectively, as were conversion rates with 16/13/7%, and resection/LAT rates with 45/37/17%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier median OS estimate in R0/1/2-resected and/or LAT group (n = 342) was 83/69/30 months for RAS& BRAFwt, RASmt and BRAFmt groups, respectively and 5-year OS-rates 67/60/24%, with Cox HR ref/1.53 (95% CI 1.04-2.25)/3.11 (1.49-6.49). In the “systemic therapy only” (n = 564) OS was 29/21/15 months and 5-year OS-rates 11/6/2% respectively, with HR ref/1.43 (1.15-1.76)/2.34 (1.73-3.17). Resection/LAT patients had improved OS over “systemic therapy only” patients in all subgroups, HR 5.74 (3.90-8.44)/5.06 (3.92-6.55)/2.89 (1.43-5.86). Conclusions: There were significant differences in resectability, conversion and resection/LAT rates according to RAS& BRAFwt, RASmt and BRAFmt status. OS was also significantly longer for RAS& BRAFwt versus either mutant. Resected/LAT had better OS than “systemic therapy alone” patients in all subgroups. Clinical trial information: NCT01531621.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Braithwaite, Matthew, Christopher Duane Nevala-Plagemann, Kelsey Baron, Benjamin Haaland, Lisa M. Pappas, and Ignacio Garrido-Laguna. "Real-world outcomes of patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC treated in the United States." Journal of Clinical Oncology 38, no. 15_suppl (2020): 4030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.4030.

Full text

Abstract:

4030 Background: BRAF mutations portend a poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recent trials have hypothesized that using more aggressive triplet-based chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFOXIRI in the frontline setting may improve outcomes in this patient population. In this study, we utilized real-world data to assess whether FOLFOXIRI is being used in the United States (US) and compared survival outcomes in BRAF mutated (BRAFmt) mCRC stratified by first line (1L) therapy. Methods: The nationwide Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database was reviewed for patients diagnosed with mCRC between 2013 and 2018. Patients who had documented BRAF mutation testing and received a standard 1L therapy were included for analysis. Patients who did not have a visit or medication order within 90 days of metastatic diagnosis were excluded to ensure patients were engaged with care at the data-providing institution. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to compare survival outcomes stratified by BRAF mutation status and 1L therapy received. Results: A total of 4,454 patients with documented BRAF mutational status were included, of which 3,988 (89.5%) were BRAF wild type (BRAFwt) and 466 (10.5%) were BRAFmt. Median OS was 15.4 months (mo) in the BRAFmt group compared to 28.1 mo in the BRAFwt group (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.41- 0.56, p < 0.001). Only 3% (n = 16) of BRAFmt patients received 1L FOLFOXIRI +/- bevacizumab with a median OS of 13.8 mo compared to 15.5 mo in patients receiving a chemotherapy doublet (FOLFOX, CAPEOX, or FOLFIRI) +/- bevacizumab (95% CI 4.9 – not reached vs 14.3 – 19.0, p = 0.38). In BRAFmt patients, multivariate analysis (MVA) did not detect a significant improvement in OS with the use of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.50-1.56, p = 0.67) or FOLFOX/CAPEOX plus bevacizumab (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 – 1.34, p = 0.58) when compared to chemotherapy doublet alone. A MVA comparing 1L therapies in the BRAFwt group did not detect a significant improvement in OS with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy doublet compared to chemotherapy doublet alone. When stratified by 1L treatment regimen, similar proportions of BRAFmt patients received second line therapy. Conclusions: This analysis of real-world data confirms the negative prognostic impact of BRAF mutations in mCRC and suggests that FOLFOXIRI has not been widely adopted in the management of these patients in the US. We were unable to demonstrate any significant difference in OS of patients with BRAFmt mCRC based on type of 1L therapy received.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hernandez-Aya, Leonel Fernando, Matthew Burke, Jenna M. Collins, et al. "Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of advanced melanoma patients following disease progression on anti-PD-1-based therapy." Journal of Clinical Oncology 38, no. 15_suppl (2020): e22036-e22036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e22036.

Full text

Abstract:

e22036 Background: Despite the success of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) based therapies that prolong survival in advanced melanoma, some patients experience disease progression. Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes after progression on anti-PD-1 based regimens are unknown. Methods: Adults with advanced melanoma and a record of disease progression on anti-PD-1 treatment (alone or in combination) between 1 Sept 2014–31 Jan 2019 were selected from the Flatiron Health Oncology electronic medical record (EMR) database for this retrospective study. Index progression date was defined as an event where the treating clinician concluded in the patient record that there had been disease progression. The first subsequent therapy received was identified. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence interval (CI) after the progression date. Analyses were run separately for BRAF mutant (mt) and wild type (wt). Results: Among 2,169 patients with advanced melanoma treated with an anti-PD-1, 213 BRAFmt and 302 BRAFwt had a record of progression following anti-PD-1 initiation and were included; an additional 82 BRAFmt and 138 BRAFwt were excluded due to death without a record of progression. Median age was 64 and 71 years, respectively; 27.7% and 9.9% had >1 line of therapy prior to the anti-PD-1. Among the BRAFmt patients who progressed on anti-PD-1, 94 (44.1%) received no subsequent therapy, 80 (37.6%) BRAF±MEK (± IO), and 16 (7.5%) anti-CTLA4 alone or with anti-PD-1 after progression on the initial anti-PD-1; 11% received other treatments with no clear pattern of care. Median (95% CI) OS from the index progression date for BRAFmt was 11.9 (8.2–16.9) months. In a subgroup of these BRAFmt patients with BRAF treatment prior to or during the first anti-PD-1 line (N = 65), 52.3% had no subsequent therapy and a median OS of 4.0 (2.7–7.5) months. Among the BRAFwt patients who progressed on anti-PD-1, 186 (61.6%) received no subsequent therapy, 46 (15.2%) received anti-CTLA4 alone or with anti-PD-1, 26 (8.6%) switched anti-PD-1s, and 15% received other treatments. Median (95% CI) OS for BRAFwt was 10.1 (8.8–12.5) months. Conclusions: In this real-world retrospective study, > 40% of BRAFmt and > 60% of BRAFwt patients did not initiate a new regimen after progression on anti-PD-1 therapy. Median OS after progression was < 1 year. This may be overestimated, as it excluded patients who died before progression was recorded in the EMR. These findings highlight a need for more effective treatments for advanced melanoma.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Trunk, Andrew, Matthew Braithwaite, Christopher Nevala-Plagemann, Lisa Pappas, Benjamin Haaland, and Ignacio Garrido-Laguna. "Real-World Outcomes of Patients With BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated in the United States." Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 20, no. 2 (2022): 144–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.7059.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: BRAF mutations portend a poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Whether these patients may benefit from more aggressive frontline chemotherapy with a triplet regimen such as FOLFOXIRI remains unclear. We used real-world data from a cohort of patients in the United States to assess the BRAF testing rate, determine the prevalence of FOLFOXIRI use, and compare survival outcomes in mCRC, stratified by BRAF mutation status and first-line therapy. Methods: A nationwide electronic health record–derived deidentified database was reviewed for patients diagnosed with mCRC between 2013 and 2018. Those with documented BRAF mutation testing who received standard first-line therapy were included. Kaplan-Meier estimates with corresponding log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling compared survival outcomes stratified by BRAF status and first-line therapy. Results: Of 4,457 included patients, 3,991 (89.5%) had BRAF wild-type (BRAFwt) and 466 (10.5%) had BRAF-mutated (BRAFmt) mCRC. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.4 months in the BRAFmt group versus 28.1 months in the BRAFwt group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.41–0.56; P<.001). Only 3% of patients with BRAF mutations received first-line FOLFOXIRI ± bevacizumab, with a median OS of 13.8 months compared with 15.5 months in those treated with doublet chemotherapy ± bevacizumab (P=.38). In patients with BRAF mutations, propensity-weighted analysis did not detect a significant improvement in OS with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.58–1.39; P=.63) or FOLFOX/CAPEOX + bevacizumab (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.52–1.26; P=.35) versus doublet chemotherapy alone. In 2018, only 56% of patients diagnosed with mCRC had documented BRAF testing at any time. Conclusions: This real-world data analysis confirms the negative prognostic impact of BRAF mutations in mCRC and suggests that FOLFOXIRI has not been widely adopted in the United States. The proportion of patients with documented BRAF testing in this real-world population was low at 56%. We were unable to show any significant difference in OS of patients with BRAFmt mCRC based on the first-line therapy received.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Contents

Academic literature on the topic 'BRAF35'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic "BRAF35"