Academic literature on the topic 'Bove, Giacomo'

The objects of my analysis are the travel writings and expedition reports of Italian Arctic explorers. In the present paper I will analyse the Journal of Giacomo Bove, who was a member of the Swedish Arctic expedition of the ship "Vega" (1878-79) headed by Nordenskjold (Il Passaggio del Nord-Est. Spedizione artica svedese della "Vega". Diario di Giacomo Bove. A cura del dott. A. Fresa, 1940, Memorie della R. Società Geografica Italiana, volume XIX. Roma.). One of the tasks given to Giacomo Bove by the Italian Geographic Society was to describe the expedition. One of the problems that Bove had to solve in this case was which words to use when speaking of an alien reality. This other reality was for him constituted not only by natural phenomena (like, i.e., fauna and flora, ice and weather), but also by an unfamiliar material culture (the life of the northern people), and by the life of the expedition.

Giacomo Bove (1852–1887) was an officer in the Royal Italian Navy who participated in Nordenskiöld's Vega expedition through the northeast passage, and in other expeditions in various parts of the world. He was, in part, responsible for drawing up plans for an Italian Antarctic expedition to depart in 1881. He died, at the age of 35, after an expedition to the Congo. A small museum in his honour has been established in his home village of Maranzana, Italy.

Giacomo Bove, an Italian participant in Adolf Erik Nordenskiöld's 1878–1880 Northeast Passage expedition, and Cristoforo Negri, director of the Italian Geographical Society, drew up plans for an Italian Antarctic expedition to depart from Genoa in 1881. The plans were for a three-year, single-vessel expedition with two winterings, one in the Ross Sea and the second in Enderby Land. They were drawn up in considerable detail and proposed a lavish budget. The expedition never took place because of failure to secure sufficient funds from public subscription and because of the unwillingness of the Italian government to provide support. However, Bove was employed by the Argentine government to put into effect expeditions that had some elements of his plans.

The 78 faunal remains recovered from the Ribadeo I shipwreck, identified as the San Giacomo di Galizia galleon found at the Ribadeo estuary of north-west Spain, represent a very small part of the meaty provisions that this 16th-century warship would have originally carried on board. Cattle, sheep, pig, goose and hake are the species identified in the three samples analysed. The number of cattle bulk-meat cuts from the axial skeleton and fore/hind leg quarters suggest beef was an important source of protein for the crew, with mutton and pork occupying a secondary position. Aging data demonstrate the consumption of meat from sub-adult and young individuals while the frequency and location of butchery marks indicate extensive processing of the carcasses into small manageable portions, particularly in the case of cattle. Recovery of a goose tarsometatarsus (low-yield meat bone) may point to live poultry on board, while a hake vertebra evidences the likely provision of stockfish. In sum, the archaeozoological analysis provides interesting information to gain some knowledge on foodways and the types of meat available on board this Spanish galleon.

Hill-Sachs lesions were first described in 1940 as grooved defect in the posterior aspect of the humeral head associated with traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation. The reported incidence of Hill-Sachs lesions following traumatic anterior instability events ranges from 60% to 90%. Despite recognition of the Hill-Sachs lesion for more than 75 years, most shoulder stabilization procedures have focused on repairing or augmenting the torn or deficient anterior soft tissues and glenoid bone in hopes of preventing engagement of the posterior humeral head defect. To help identify lesions that are important causes of instability, both Palmer and Widen and Burkhart and De Beer described the ‘‘engaging’’ Hill-Sachs lesion, which refers to one that engages the rim of the glenoid when the shoulder is physiologically abducted and externally rotated. Engaging Hill-Sachs lesions lead to recurrent instability, and a high rate of failure when treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair alone. There are two methods to assess the Hill-Sachs lesion related with surgical decision making for concomitant remplissage procedure. One method is dynamic examination. During arthroscopic surgery, the relative relationship between the Hill-Sachs lesion and the glenoid can be assessed. The important thing is that this dynamic examination should be performed after the Bankart repair. The disadvantage of this method is that there is a risk of damaging the repair during the dynamic examination. The second method is to use the ‘glenoid track’ concept. The width of the glenoid track, defined as the distance between the medial margin of the glenoid track and the medial margin of the footprint of the rotator cuff was 83% of the glenoid width when the arm was at 90° of abduction in live shoulders. Our institution use en face views of both glenoids and the posterior view of the involved humeral head on 3D CT. First, we measure the width of the intact glenoid and calculate 83% of the glenoid width(0.83D). Then, this 83% value (0.83D) is applied to the involved glenoid en face view. If there is a bony defect of the glenoid, the defect width ‘d’ needs to be subtracted from the 83% value (0.83D) to obtain the true width of the glenoid track (0.83D - d). We apply this width (0.83D - d) to the posterior view of the humeral head. If the medial margin of the Hill-Sachs le stays within the glenoid track, there is no risk that this Hill-Sachs lesion engages with the anterior rim of the glenoid. If the Hill-Sachs lesion extends more medially over the medial margin of the glenoid track, there is a risk of engagement and dislocation. The former used to be called ‘on-track HSL’ and the latter ‘off-track Hill-Sachs lesion’. Based on the on-track/off-track concept, treatment strategy is as follows. For shoulders with on-track Hill-Sachs lesion and glenoid bone loss of < 25%, Bankart repair alone is sufficient. With on-track Hill-Sachs lesion and glenoid bone loss of ≥ 25%, the glenoid bone loss needs to be fixed, for example by the Latarjet procedure. With off-track Hill-Sachs lesion and the glenoid bone loss of < 25%, Bankart repair plus remplissage is needed. In addressing recurrent anterior shoulder instability, surgical decision making for additional remplissage procedure is inevitable. There are two methods: one is glenoid track method which can be employed in preoperative evaluation. The other is assessment of engaged Hill-Sachs lesion during arthroscopic evaluation. Which one do you prefer? References Hill, H.A. and M.D. Sachs, The grooved defect of the humeral head: a frequently unrecognized complication of dislocations of the shoulder joint. Radiology, 1940. 35(6): p. 690-700. Burkhart, S.S. and J.F. De Beer, Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2000. 16(7): p. 677-694. Flatow, E.L. and J.J. Warner, Instability of the shoulder: Complex problems and failed repairs: Part 1. Relevant biomechanics, multidirectional instability, and severe loss of glenoid and humeral bone. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1998. 80(1): p. 122. Lynch, J.R., et al., Treatment of osseous defects associated with anterior shoulder instability. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2009. 18(2): p. 317-328. Buza, J.A., 3 rd, et al., Arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014. 96(7): p. 549-55. Spatschil, A., et al., Posttraumatic anterior-inferior instability of the shoulder: arthroscopic findings and clinical correlations. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2006. 126(4): p. 217-222. Yiannakopoulos, C.K., E. Mataragas, and E. Antonogiannakis, A comparison of the spectrum of intra-articular lesions in acute and chronic anterior shoulder instability. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2007. 23(9): p. 985-990. Itoi, E., ‘On-track’ and ‘off-track’ shoulder lesions. EFORT Open Rev, 2017. 2(8): p. 343-351. Parke, C., et al. Arthroscopic remplissage for humeral defect in anterior shoulder instability: is it needed. in 39th annual meeting of Japan Shoulder Society, Tokyo. 2012. Yamamoto, N., et al., Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2007. 16(5): p. 649-656. Omori, Y., et al., Measurement of the glenoid track in vivo as investigated by 3-dimensional motion analysis using open MRI. The American journal of sports medicine, 2014. 42(6): p. 1290-1295. Di Giacomo, G., E. Itoi, and S.S. Burkhart, Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from “engaging/non-engaging” lesion to ”on-track/off-track” lesion. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2014. 30(1): p. 90-98. Locher, J., et al., Hill-Sachs off-track lesions as risk factor for recurrence of instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2016. 32(10): p. 1993-1999. Shaha, J.S., et al., Clinical validation of the glenoid track concept in anterior glenohumeral instability. JBJS, 2016. 98(22): p. 1918-1923. Yamamoto, N., et al., The stabilizing mechanism of the Latarjet procedure: a cadaveric study. JBJS, 2013. 95(15): p. 1390-1397. Connolly, J., Humeral head defects associated with shoulder dislocation: their diagnostic and surgical significance. Instr. Course Lect., 1972. 2: p. 210-218. Purchase, R.J., et al., Hill-Sachs “remplissage”: an arthroscopic solution for the engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2008. 24(6): p. 723-726. Boileau, P., et al., Arthroscopic Hill-Sachs Remplissage with Bankart Repair: Strategy and Technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech, 2014. 4(1): p. e4.

O uso do planejamento virtual na implantodontia tem sido cada vez mais empregado devido à obtenção de resultados satisfatórios, trazendo benefícios tanto para o paciente como para o cirurgião dentista. Desse modo, o objetivo deste trabalho foi relatar um caso de reabilitação bimaxilar com implantes dentários e próteses do tipo protocolo na qual o guia cirúrgico foi confeccionado através do planejamento virtual, subsidiado pelo exame tomográfico do próprio paciente. Paciente do sexo feminino, 70 anos de idade, leucoderma, procurou atendimento para reabilitação com implantes dentários, após o exame clínico e imaginológico observou-se boa condição óssea e ausência de comorbidades sistêmicas. Dessa forma, optou-se pela realização da instalação de seis implantes maxilares (hexágono externo) e cinco implantes mandibulares (hexágono externo), que seriam suportes para as próteses do tipo protocolo com carregamento imediato. As posições exatas de instalação dos implantes ocorreram através da confecção do guia virtual tomando-se como referência os cortes tomográficos durante duplo escaneamento, seguido pelo planejamento e adaptação virtual. O paciente encontra-se com 1 ano de acompanhamento, sem sinais ou sintomas de infecção ou queixas funcionais e estéticas. A cirurgia virtual guiada se mostra uma ferramenta valiosa para desafios clínicos de reconstruções maxilares e mandibulares, onde o cirurgião-dentista, por meio da sua experiência clínica, do conhecimento adquirido e da literatura consolidada, deve discernir quando é indicado utilizar a cirurgia virtual guiada e quais procedimentos serão conduzidos para obter a reabilitação estética e funcional, trazendo uma maior previsibilidade e conforto para o paciente.Descritores: Implantes Dentários; Reabilitação Bucal; Técnicas de Planejamento; Cirurgia Bucal.Referênciasvan Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blombäck U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A, Wendelhag I. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(Suppl 1):S111-20.Ganz SD. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(9 Suppl 2):59-71.Laleman I, Bernard L, Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM, Quirynen M. Guided implant surgery in the edentulous maxilla: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(Suppl):s103-17.Di Giacomo GA, da Silva JV, da Silva AM, Paschoal GH, Cury PR, Szarf G. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. J Periodontol. 2012;83(4):410-19.Johansson B, Friberg B, Nilson H. Digitally planned, immediately loaded dental implants with prefabricated prostheses in the reconstruction of edentulous maxillae: a 1-year prospective, multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(3):194-200.Schiroli G, Angiero F, Silvestrini-Biavati A, Benedicenti S. Zygomatic implant placement with flapless computer-guided surgery: a proposed clinical protocol. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(12):2979-89.Sunitha RV, Sapthagiri E. Flapless implant surgery: a 2-year follow-up study of 40 implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(4):e237-43. Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(9):980-8.Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Flapless versus conventional flapped dental implant surgery: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100624.De Bruyn H, Atashkadeh M, Cosyn J, van de Velde T. Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUnite™ implants installed with flapless or flap surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13(3):175-83. Van de Velde T, Glor F, De Bruyn H. A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):66-72. Romero-Ruiz MM, Mosquera-Perez R, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Torres-Lagares D. Flapless implant surgery: A review of the literature and 3 case reports. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(1):e146-52. Sclar AG. Guidelines for flapless surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):20-32.Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(4):571-77.Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, Jaschke W, Bale RJ. In vitro accuracy of a novel registration and targeting technique for image-guided template production. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(4):502-8. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, Birkfellner W, Enislidis G. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):785-90. Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Flapless implant placement: a technique to eliminate the need for a removable interim prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(3):232-35. Daas M, Assaf A, Dada K, Makzoumé J. Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Immediate Loading of a Full Arch Restoration: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study of 14 Consecutively Treated Patients. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:824127.Sanna AM, Molly L, van Steenberghe D. Immediately loaded CAD-CAM manufactured fixed complete dentures using flapless implant placement procedures: a cohort study of consecutive patients. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6):331-39.Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43(2):192-203.Berdougo M, Fortin T, Blanchet E, Isidori M, Bosson JL. Flapless implant surgery using an image-guided system. A 1- to 4-year retrospective multicenter comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(2):142-52.Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(Suppl 1):S21-7.Campelo LD, Camara JR. Flapless implant surgery: a 10-year clinical retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(2):271-76.Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E, Romanos GE. Immediate occlusal loading of implants placed in fresh sockets after tooth extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(6):955-62.Barone A, Rispoli L, Vozza I, Quaranta A, Covani U. Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. J Periodontol. 2006;77(11):1914-20.Barbier L, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Jacobs R. Peri-implant bone changes following tooth extraction, immediate placement and loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(4):1061-70.Meloni SM, Tallarico M, De Riu G, Pisano M, Deledda A, Lolli FM, Massarelli O, Tullio A. Guided implant surgery after free-flap reconstruction: Four-year results from a prospective clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(8):1348-55.Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(2):305-13.

The object of research is the residential architecture of the heyday of the Russian Empire that has undergone many changes under the influence of time and urban transformation. However, the drawings of Italian architects as primary sources, can tell a lot about architectural and landscape heritage of the Russian cities of XVIII-XIX centuries. That was the period of origination and development of architectural drawing and Building Code in Russia. Domenico Trezzini, Francesco Rastrelli, Giacomo Quarenghi, Luigi Rusca, Domenico Gilardi, Giuseppe Bova, and others created their precious works of art. Thanks to the remaining drawings it is possible to write not only the history of architecture, but also restore the monuments of the Russian Empire.