Journal articles on the topic 'Bobrinskiĭ'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Bobrinskiĭ.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Bobrinskiĭ.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Матонин, В. Н. "Return to the Motherland: Alexey Valerianovich Bragin-Bobrinsky notes and memoirs." Grand Altai Research & Education / Наука и образование Большого Алтая, no. 0(16) (March 4, 2022): 195–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.25712/astu.2410-485x.2022.00.016.
Full textAbstract:
В публикации представлены сведения о династии архангельских военных и судейских чиновников Брагиных из домашнего архива жителя Архангельска Вадима Николаевича Брагина (1935-2015) и воспоминания его племянника Алексея Валериановича Брагина-Бобринского (1938-2014). В воспоминаниях идет речь о жизни Брагиных-Бобринских в эмиграции (1918-1960). Алексей Валерианович Брагин-Бобринский — сын белого офицера Валериана Флегонтовича Брагина и графини Юлии Владимировны Бобринской. Род Бобринских ведет начало от А.Г. Бобринского, внебрачного сына Екатерины II и ее фаворита Г.Г. Орлова. The publication presents information about the Bragin dynasty — Arkhangelsk military and judicial officials. Data are from the home archive of Vadim Nikolaevich Bragin (1935-2015), a resident of Arkhangelsk, and the memoirs of his nephew Alexei Valerianovich Bragin-Bobrinsky (1935-2015). The memoirs are about the Bragins-Bobrinskys life in exile (1918-1960). Alexey Valerianovich Bragin-Bobrinsky is a son of White officer Valerian Flegontovich Bragin and Countess Yulia Vladimirovna Bobrinskaya. The Bobrinsky family originates from A.G. Bobrinsky — an illegitimate son of Catherine II and her favorite G.G. Orlov.
2
Benda, Petr, and Marjan Mashkour. "A finding of Eptesicus gobiensis in an ancient salt mine in Iran and notes on the status of this bat in the Middle East (Mammalia: Chiroptera)." Journal of the National Museum (Prague), Natural History Series 190, no. 1 (2021): 61–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/jnmpnhs.2021.004.
Full textAbstract:
Two mummified bats were found in an ancient salt mine near Chehrabad, NW Iran. One complete and one partial skeletons, both associated with parts of the pelage, were identified as Eptesicus gobiensis, a bat species rare in the Middle East. The comparison of skull and statistical evaluation of craniodental data showed this bat to belong to the identical taxon as the mummified bats previously collected in Qutur Su caves, NW Iran; this part of Iran is thus an area of broader distribution of this bat, the second record reported here confirms its preference for dry upper plateaus. This Iranian population exhibits much similarity with E. gobiensis bobrinskoi living in lowland deserts of Kazakhstan, but it simultaneously shows morphological and ecological differences from the Kazakhstani populations. Therefore, the population of Iran is here tentatively identified as E. g. cf. bobrinskoi. The species rank of E. gobiensis was found to be composed of three morphotypes living in three separate ranges, E. g. gobiensis in mountain plateaus of Central Asia, E. g. bobrinskoi in lowlands of Kazakhstan, and E. g. cf. bobrinskoi in NW Iran. However, the phylogenetic and taxonomic statuses of the Iranian morphotype still remain to be elicudated.
3
Pimonova, Daria Aleksandrovna. "Virtual Reconstruction of Bobrinsky Estate Landscape Park in Bogoroditsk: Sources, Methods and Research Technologies." Историческая информатика, no. 2 (February 2021): 115–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2585-7797.2021.2.36035.
Full textAbstract:
The article virtually reconstructs Bogoroditsky Park of the Bobrinsky estate located in the city of Bogoroditsk, Tula region. The author briefly describes the history of the city and the estate, the biography of the park creator A. T. Bolotov, presents the results of the analysis of historiographical studies on the history of the development of Russian landscape art and the features of its development in the 18th century. Some paragraphs of the article study the formation of a complex of historical sources that served the basis for reconstruction, their criticism, as well as methods and technologies for creating a virtual reconstruction of the park ensemble of the Bobrinsky estate. The author illustrates the article with still frames of the virtual reality created. The virtual reconstruction of Bobrinsky estate park ensemble is one of the first works within the frames of historical 3D modeling where the landscape park is the central research object. The result of the work is the virtual reconstruction of the A. T. Bolotov's Park on the territory of the Bobrinsky estate in Bogoroditsk. The project is of quite great practical importance since the study addresses the federal level object. The virtual reconstruction can be used in the Bogoroditsky Palace-Museum and park as well as the State Historical Museum where an album of A. T. Bolotov's watercolors is kept. In addition, the project could become the basis for a real reconstruction of the park in Bogoroditsk.
4
Kana'an, Ruba. "The de Jure 'Artist' of the Bobrinski Bucket: Production and Patronage of Metalwork in pre-Mongol Khurasan and Transoxiana." Islamic Law and Society 16, no. 2 (2009): 175–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/092893809x12469547140955.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe Bobrinski bucket, made in Herat in 599/1163, is one of the most iconic metalwork objects studied by historians of Islamic art. To date, art historical scholarship on the bucket has focused on interpreting its decorative programme and identifying the decorator, Mas'ud ibn Ahmad, whose name is inscribed on the bucket, as the 'artist' who had the intellectual property of the design and its application. In this essay, I investigate the meaning of signatures left by 'artists' by examining the range of possible relationships between four men whose names appear in the dedication inscription of the Bobrinski bucket. The legal writings of Hanafī jurists from Khurasan and Transoxiana, including al-Sarakhsī (d. ca. 1090), provide an important, and hitherto unexplored, source for understanding the legal rights and responsibilities of the different parties involved in the production of a metalwork object from conception to final product, including the stages of commissioning, manufacture, sale, and repair. The treatment by Muslim jurists of the different forms of trade provides a better understanding of the potential legal and contractual capacity in which a metalwork artist could sign his work.
5
Карпань, І. С., and Н. С. Чернікова. "Social-political activity of O. Bobrinsky in the last quarter of the nineteenth century." Problems of Political History of Ukraine, no. 14 (June 12, 2019): 58–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.33287/1196.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with problems of the noble class in post-reform period in Russia (70–90-ies XIXth cent.) through A. Bobrinsky’s activity as the Leader of the St. Petersburg nobility. The study analyzed his activities towards the Nobility consolidation and involvement their representatives into development of Russian state policy. A. Bobrinsky belonged to the family of large landowners and successful sugar-growers of the Russian Empire. It greatly influenced to the formation of his political worldview and contributed to the growth of the young Count’s authority among the Nobility and Gentry. In the last quarter of the XIXth cent. A. Bobrinsky defended the dominant position of the Nobility as the provincial Governor (the Leader) of the St. Petersburg nobility. A. Bobrinsky’s main efforts were aimed to the consolidation of the Gentry to defend their own rights and privileges and their involvement to the Russian state authorities. He promoted the idea of founding a representative institution – the Duma or Zemsky Sobor – in Russian Empire. However, the purpose of its creation he was seen in the count in the redistribution of executive, judicial and punitive powers between government representatives and elected people from the Nobility. He was convinced that only the Gentry was worthy to represent the interests of Russian society in the state authorities. During this period, the young Bobrinsky attempted to unite the St. Petersburg nobility into the organization of «Svyataya Druzhyna». It was a semi-secret organization which established to protect of the Russian Tsar from possible terrorist acts. The purpose of the organization was rather limited and local, so it disintegrated soon. However, it contributed to the growth of A. Bobrysky’s authority as a loyal to the Tsar and autocracy personality. It had a great importance in the conditions of the economic and political crisis of the noble class. In the 90’s of the XIX cent. A. Bobrinsky took an active part in nobility meetings devoted to problems of the privileged class. Here he defended an idea of preserving the privileges and dominant position of the estate Nobility. He opposed the provision of political rights and state support to the estateless nobles-homeowners and representatives of the bourgeoisie. A. Bobrinsky didn’t reject an idea to create conditions for the nobility replenishment by the new social classes, but he saw it possibility only in the distant future. However, even government support didn’t contribute to consolidation processes and politicization among the nobility class. A. Bobrinsky with sadness stated that the meetings of the noble leaders continued to be only like private talks about preserving the nobility former positions in the social structure. So he had to change strategy and initiated the founding in 1906 a new organization – the United Nobility. During the next decade its existence largely predetermined the main directions of Russian government policy and as a whole.
6
Лапшин, А. Г. "ABOUT IMITATION OF «SUZDAL HYSTERA-AMULET»." Archaeology of Vladimir-Suzdal land, no. 12 (December 25, 2022): 131–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.25681/iaras.2022.978-5-94375-387-9.131-139.
Full textAbstract:
Ближайшей аналогией «Суздальскому змеевику» является «составной каменный змеевик» из коллекции А. А. Бобринского. Эти два амулета сближает иконография, материал, надписи на русском языке. Амулет А. А. Бобринского принято считать антикварной подделкой. Однако компаративный анализ амулетов позволяет заключить, что «составной каменный змеевик» является не подделкой, но аналогией «Суздальскому змеевику», относится к категории изделий медицинского назначения и воплощает медицинскую традицию с историей более 2000 лет. The closest analogy to the «Suzdal hystera-amulet» is the «composite stone hystera-amulet» from the collection of A. A. Bobrinsky. These two amulets are brought together by iconography, material, inscriptions in Russian. The amulet of A. A. Bobrinsky is considered to be an antiquarian imitation. However, results of comparative analysis of both amulets bring us to conclude that the «composite stone hystera-amulet» is not an immitation, but an analogy to the «Suzdal hystera-amulet», belongs to the category of medical device and embodies a medical tradition with a history of more than 2000 years.
7
Joantă, Serafim. "Father Professor BORIS BOBRINSKOY (1925-2020): A Theologian of the Spiritual Experience." Review of Ecumenical Studies Sibiu 13, no. 1 (April 1, 2021): 117–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ress-2021-0016.
Full text
8
Korenevskiy, Sergey Nikolaevich, and Andrey Sergeevich Kizilov. "ON THE STUDY OF THE MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES DEALS WITH THE CERAMICS OF THE MAIKOP- NOVOSVOBODNAYA COMMUNITY BY THE METHOD OF. A. A. BOBRINSKY AND NEW EXPERIMENTS." Samara Journal of Science 4, no. 4 (December 1, 2015): 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv20154206.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents a brief synthesis of the results deal with the study of ceramics Maikop-novosvobodnaya community using the method of a. a. Bobrinsky and use of the microscope with 12 times magnification. it sets out ideas about raw materials, methods of construction, surface treatment. especially emphasized the problem of the use by the ancient potters of rotary devices. For the first time about such vessels were noted in the work of a. a. Bobrinsky and r. M. Munchaev in 1966, for example, vessels with a flat bottom. at present a series of examples of traces deal with use of rotary devices has expanded. in the article by a. s. Kizilov shows the simulation of the vessel of the Maikop culture and fixation of the traces of its turn without a fixed axis of rotation and with a non-fixed environment of rotation. as a result, the actual doing of those and other traces that prove the use of Maikop potters rotary devices with a fixed axis of rotation in the manufacture of vessels not only flat, but round bottom too.
9
Ivanov, A. A. "COUNT VLADIMIR BOBRINSKY AND THE SECOND MARMAROS-SZIGET LEGAL TRIAL: BASED ON RUSSIAN PRESS." Rusin, no. 54 (December 1, 2018): 145–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/18572685/54/9.
Full text
10
Zherebyatyev, Denis Igorevich, and Daria Aleksandrovna Pimonova. "Virtual reconstruction of small architectural forms of the Bogoroditsky Palace and Park ensemble of the estate of Counts Bobrinsky of the late XVIII century." Историческая информатика, no. 2 (February 2023): 102–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2585-7797.2023.2.43509.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the virtual reconstruction of small architectural forms of the Bogoroditsky Park of the Bobrinsky estate. In addition to the unique architectural ensemble, this place was famous for its park, and all thanks to its creator – the estate manager Andrey Timofeevich Bolotov. It was A.T. Bolotov who left the most detailed memories of the construction of the park ensemble, as well as a whole album with sketches of the views of the park, which allows us to present the beauty and grandeur of the estate today. The focus of the virtual reconstruction is on the most beautiful part of the park, which was located to the northwest of the palace, closer to the shore of a Large pond. The article discusses the techniques of landscape design used by the estate manager A.T.Bolotov at the end of the XVIII century, the features of the construction of the park and the difficulties encountered in creating objects of small architectural forms. The methods and technologies of computer modeling used in creating a three-dimensional historical reconstruction of small architectural forms, the relief of the park, reservoirs and green spaces based on historical sources are analyzed in detail. The work contains a study on the history of the construction of the Bobrinsky Estate park, its development after the resignation of the manager A.T. Bolotov, development and restoration in the XX – XXI centuries, provides an overview of historical sources, including materials of the Restoration and Architecture LLC project in 2014, which allow restoring the historical appearance of the palace and park ensemble of the estate.
11
Shcherbakov, Nikolai Borisovich, Sean Patrick Quinn, Iia Alexandrovna Shuteleva, Tatiana Alexeevna Leonova, Ulia Vladimirovna Lunkova, Vladimir Yurievich Lunkov, and Alexandra Amurievna Golyeva. "Some results of technical and technological analysis of late bronze age ceramics of the Southern Urals tribes exemplified by the materials of Kazburun archaeological microdistrict (Republic of Bashkortostan)." Samara Journal of Science 5, no. 1 (March 1, 2016): 76–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv20161202.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses the use of traditional methods within the A.A. Bobrinsky historical-cultural approach to pottery analysis that allow us to consider each vessel as a source of information of the design and starting of the hollow body of the vessel. Thus, a more or less whole vessel may render information about a particular container design pattern or the skills of a particular potter group. This approach to ceramics allows you to study the cultural traditions in the manufacture of ceramics and, accordingly, closed family groups which have produced, and on the basis of radiocarbon dating to determine the time of its manufacture: Usmanovo I - III settlements (1930 - 1750 BC - Beta Analytic) and Kazburun I barrows (AMS 1820 - 1795 BC - Beta Analytic). However, ceramic archaeological complex Kazburun neighborhood has become one of the important factors in identifying cultural transformations and cultural interactions in the Late Bronze Age in the Southern Urals. Experimental methods of historical-cultural approach A.A. Bobrinsky to reconstruct the pottery of the late Bronze Age, the Southern Urals. Methods of technical and technological analysis of pottery made it possible to reconstruct not only the pottery tradition of the Late Bronze Age of the Southern Urals, but also allowed a glimpse into the past of the studied population. As a new method of ceramic petrographic study research method was applied, which revealed the inclusion of various minerals in the blood vessels dough, to determine the temperature and the intensity of the burning, and to prove the presence of sludge in ceramic test. Further application of this method will allow in the future to determine the locations of ancient Clay and ceramic technology to reconstruct the Late Bronze Age of the Bashkir Transurals.
12
P. Hamp, Eric. "Albanian thikë 'knife'." Linguistica 33, no. 1 (December 1, 1993): 67–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.33.1.67-68.
Full textAbstract:
In the volume of essays Languages and Areas: Studies presented to George V. Bobrinskoy (Chicago 1967) 66--9, I struggled to find cognates and an Inda-European background for the obviously inherited Albanian thike, which is the ordinary word for a knife. I was exploring, without finding anything anything conclusive, the possibili ties of Indo-Iranian. It seemed to me then, and it still does, that lndo-Iranian assures us of an etymon *kika. 'sand, ravel'; I preferred then, in consideration of śitá- = Lat. catus etc., to trace this to *kǝ-kā., a zero-grade of*kō- (= *k'eH -), rather than to *ki-kā. I further discussed the problems and limitations of the Albanian vocalism and of a suffix in -k-.
13
Collis, Robert. "A European Entrancement: Animal Magnetism among the Russian Nobility in France and St Petersburg, 1784–1787." Slavonic and East European Review 101, no. 4 (October 2023): 723–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/see.2023.a923984.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: This article examines the reception of animal magnetism among the Russian nobility in the mid 1780s, at a time when this pseudo-science aroused the curiosity and scorn of many across Europe. The first part of the article focuses on how young Russian noblemen — including Catherine II's illegitimate son, Aleksei Bobrinskii — first encountered animal magnetism in France during Grand Tours, via Masonic networks that were utilized by their governors. Significantly, the Russian noblemen were not only introduced to Franz Mesmer's well-known form of animal magnetism, which sought to cure ailments through physical contact and the use of baquets , but they were also exposed to magnetic somnambulism. This strand of animal magnetism purportedly enabled patients to see the cause of ailments within themselves and others. Moreover, practitioners in Lyon believed that magnetic somnambulism offered the potential for a somnambule to obtain powers of clairvoyance and to be able to achieve a higher state of spiritual consciousness. The second part of this article studies how both strands of animal magnetism — Mesmeric and magnetic somnambulism — briefly flourished in St Petersburg in 1786, the first practitioner being Borbinskii's governor, before Catherine II effectively banned the practice.
14
Oybek, Maxmudov. "“This Doctrine ... Originated from Ismailism, but It Has Moved so Far Away from It that I Positively Consider ‘Panj-Ten’ as a Very Special Religion...”: Materials on Pamir Ismailism Collected by A. A. Cherkasov in 1904." ISTORIYA 12, no. 5 (103) (2021): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s207987840015928-9.
Full textAbstract:
The article takes into consideration the unique data about Pamir Ismailism collected by the secretary of the Imperial Political Agency in Bukhara the Baron A. A. Cherkasov in 1904. There are presented the main provisions of the data reported by A. A. Cherkasov, to having the science enriched by new data on Pamir Ismailism. There were given some features of the doctrine of the Pamir Ismailis and how special this form of Ismailism is in comparison with other forms of Islam. This information make it possible to present the attitude of the Ismaili Imam Aga Khan III to the policy of Russia and England in the region and Russian officials’ perception of the Pamir population, Ismailis and Ismailism in general. In addition, they are supplemented by the information reported by A. A. Bobrinsky, A. A. Semenov and A. E. Snesarev on the doctrine and customs of the Pamir Ismailis.
15
Vasilieva, Irina Nikolaevna. "Some review on the results of technical and technological analysis of ceramics (on the example of the Rakushechny Yar settlement)." Samara Journal of Science 7, no. 3 (August 15, 2018): 137–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv201873203.
Full textAbstract:
The article gives the results on the problem of pottery technology usage in the population which left a multilayered stratified settlement of the neo-Eneolithic Age of Rakushechny Yar. It is located on the island of Porechny in the riverbed of the Don river, which is near Razdorskaya village of Rostov Region in Russian Federation. This research is a long-term study concerning the problem of ancient pottery technology usage in Eastern European territory of Russia. The author found it is important to use both the historical and cultural approach and the method of A.A. Bobrinskiy. This method includes binocular microscopy, tracology and physical modeling experiment. The authors studied 294 samples of ceramics (separate vessels approximately) in Rakushechny Yar. Thus, the article describes the techniques and methods for selecting plastic raw materials, composing molding masses, making vessels, giving a general description of the Lower Don region Early Neolithic pottery. Moreover the author uses the comparative analysis to describe the new knowledge and give more information on the problem concerning the pottery technology usage in these regions. The author gives similar and different specific features of the neolithization process in the Don and the Volga regions as well as the questions concerning the origin and the development of early Neolithic pottery traditions in south steppe zone of the Eastern Europe.
16
Villar, José R. "Boris BOBRINSKOY, La vie liturgique, Les Éditions du Cerf, Paris 2000, 146 pp., 16 x 22, ISBN 2-204-06529-3." Scripta Theologica 35, no. 1 (November 21, 2017): 274. http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/006.35.12988.
Full text
17
Tsetlin, Yuriy Borisovich. "POTTERY PRODUCTION IN THE MORDOVIA DISTRICT: ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY." Samara Journal of Science 4, no. 4 (December 1, 2015): 96–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv20154211.
Full textAbstract:
The paper tells about the results of systematization and analysis of ethnography data on pottery production in Mordovia district, collected by alexander a. Bobrinsky in the beginning of 1960th during complete questionnaire work. there are 75 messages as from the potters themselves (very rare) as from their younger relatives, local school-teachers, and others. then became clear that most of the local potters were russian migrants (not the Mordovians) lived here from 17-18th centuries. distribution the russian pottery traditions destroyed the local Mordovian ones preserved only in traces. But the russian potters in Mordovia had retained more archaic pottery traditions than the same potters resided in russia. Just these traditions have a lot of interest to study. the author investigates the Mordovian pottery production through the system of Historical-and-cultural approach according to the universal structure of pottery technology and the whole pottery production process as a field of the human culture.
18
Rakhimzhanova, Saule Zhangeldyevna. "Technological analysis of Early Bronze ceramics of Shauke 1 settlement." Samara Journal of Science 6, no. 2 (June 1, 2017): 104–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv201762202.
Full textAbstract:
The paper introduces the first results of special technical and technological investigation of ceramic artifacts discovered during the excavations of the Early Bronze Age settlement Shauke 1 located in the Pavlodar Region of North-East Kazakhstan. The research of ceramic objects is conducted within historical and cultural approach following A.A. Bobrinskys technique. 53 samples from different vessels were selected for the technological analysis of ceramic artifacts found at the settlement. The samples were investigated with the use of a binocular microscope MBS-10. The main objective of the research was to identify cultural traditions at a preparatory stage of ceramic vessels production. The author studied initial raw materials selection skills and forming substance preparation. The author recorded the use of several conditional spots as sources of raw materials. Six different recipes of forming substances were identified at the settlement of Shauke 1. The most common amongst them are clay + chamotte + organic solution (60,38%), clay + chamotte + bone + organic solution (28,30%). This indicates the presence of artisans who followed different traditions of pottery production at the site.
19
Ilyushina, Viktoria V. "Early Neolithic Ceramic Complex of the Settlement of Mergen 6 in the Lower Ishim: technological aspect." Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya (The Volga River Region Archaeology) 3, no. 41 (September 30, 2022): 120–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.24852/pa2022.3.41.120.134.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents the results of a study on the technologies making of Early Neolithic ceramics from the settlement of Mergen 6 – a reference site in the development of issues of the Early Neolithic in the forest-steppe zone of the Tobol-Ishim interfluve. Based on morphological characteristics, the researchers divided the ceramic complex of the settlement into four groups – the frst and second groups correspond to the traditions of the Boborykino and Koshkino cultures, the third group includes vessels with sculptural ornamentation as relief bands – the «relief-band» group, the fourth is represented by vessels with mixed ornamental features – «syncretic» group. The study of the ceramic collection was carried out by the author according to the method of A.A. Bobrinsky. The features of ancient potters' skills at the stages of selection of initial plastic raw materials were revealed, as well as composition of molding masses, the surface treatment of products and fring them. Based on the data obtained, the issue of the emergence of pottery technology in the region under consideration is discussed.
20
Berezkina, Svetlana. "S. P. Shevyrev’s Poems for сhildren (1857–1858)." Children's Readings: Studies in Children's Literature 19, no. 1 (2021): 337–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.31860/2304-5817-2021-1-19-337-359.
Full textAbstract:
The article is concerned with the analysis of S. P. Shevyrev’s poems for children that had been written in 1857–1858. These years were hard for the poet; the majority of magazines were rejecting his works. The reason for this was S. P. Shevyrev’s run-in with gr. V. A. Bobrinsky (cousin of Alexander II), which turned into a fist-fight. In 1857–1858 his poems regularly appeared only in two magazines: “Zvezdochka” and “Luchi, a magazine for girls”, published by A. O. Ishimova for the schoolgirls of noble boarding schools. The article considers two themes in S. P. Shevyrev’s poems for children. He was writing religious poems for the children who were thoroughly familiar with the Bible and that allowed him to keep complexity of his plots. His second theme was the working life of Russian peasantry, which he depicted with exceptional love. S. P. Shevyrev in his poems always merges deep piety of Russian peasants and their hard labors. The article offers the poet’s unpublished poem about the fate of a poor orphan boy.
21
Vasilyeva, Irina Nikolaevna. "Pottery technology of the Early Neolithic population Podon'ya." Samara Journal of Science 6, no. 3 (September 1, 2017): 109–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv201763207.
Full textAbstract:
The paper publishes the long-term study results of the Early Neolithic population pottery technology in the Lower, Middle and Upper Don Region. This research was carried out within the framework of the historical and cultural approach by the method of A.A. Bobrinsky. It was based on binocular microscopy, traceology and experiment in the form of physical modeling. 483 samples of ceramics (conditionally separate vessels) were subjected to techno-technological analysis. They originate from the cultural layers of the Rakushechny Yar camp (294) and I Razdorskaya site (4), located in the Lower Don region, as well as 14 sites of the Middle and Upper Don Region containing Karamyshev type ceramics (185). The authors give a general description of the Early Neolithic pottery of the Don region and a comparative analysis of the data on pottery technology of the Lower, Middle and Upper Don Region population. The problems of the origin and distribution of early Neolithic pottery traditions are considered, the similarities and differences in the neolithization process in the Don region and the Volga region are distinguished.
22
SUKHANOV, Evgeny. "A new approach to the periodization of polished ceramics of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture." STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA 26, no. 2 (2020): 343–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saa-2020-26-2-13.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents a technique of periodization of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture burials based on the shapes of polished vessels. The methodological basis of the research is historical-and-cultural approach. This is a scientific direction developed by the famous Russian ceramic researcher A.A. Bobrinsky. The materials of the study are the most popular categories of vessels from the catacomb cemeteries of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture. These are jugs and cups from Dmitrievka and Yutanovka cemeteries. The main hypothesis of the study is as follows: (1) Burials with polished vessels of the mass traditions of shapes creating are earlier on the cemetery; (2) During the necropolis functioning, the erosion of mass traditions of vessel shapes creating took place; (3) Distribution of new (possibly mixed) traditions belongs to the late period of necropolis functioning. Burials with vessels of the ‘new’ traditions should be attributed to the late period of the burial ground’s existence. The hypothesis found a number of independent confirmations at both burial sites studied. These are metal inventory, planigraphy, and topography of graves.
23
Schultze, E., and M. V. Lyubichev. "KILNS OF THE WESTERN AND EASTERN REGIONS OF THE CHERNYAKHIV CULTURE: NEW MATERIALS TO THE ORGANIZATION OF POTTERY PRODUCTION." Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine 30, no. 1 (March 25, 2019): 189–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2019.01.15.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of this paper was to compare the pottery kilns of the Chernyakhiv culture in two disparate regions for evaluating the organization in pottery manufacturing based on the kilns, their construction and material. Today 11 sites in the western region and 5 sites in the eastern region are known each with one or several kilns. The kilns can be divided in type 1—6 after Bobrinskiy (or the variant A—C after Henning). On the current state of research type 2 seems to prevail in the western region, type 3 in the eastern region. As an example for new investigations the kilns found in Voitenki (Kharkiv county) are presented in detail.
Furthermore structures / constructions around the kilns were considered to find evidences for the existence of workshops. In both regions under discussion such remains has been observed rarely (Komariv, Voitenki). Concerning the question, if pottery was produced seasonally or all-the-year, remains of repairs in the kilns were taken into account in both regions (Lepesovka, Voitenki). Another point was the position of the kilns within the settlements. In the western region they were situated at the border of the settlement or even apart them. In the eastern region they were found in several parts of the settlement, in Voitenki in a special part, where evidences of technical works and craft activities are concentrated. After all it seems that in both regions of the Chernyakhiv culture the organization of pottery production worked on a similar economic level, but with local modifications in every settlement.
24
Sukhanov, Evgeny V. "ON THE POTTERY TECHNOLOGY OF THE POPULATION OF THE SOUTH-WESTERN CRIMEA IN THE LATE ROMAN PERIOD (BASED ON MATERIALS OF HAND-MADE POTTERY)." Rossiiskaia arkheologiia, no. 4 (October 1, 2023): 75–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s0869606323040177.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the manufacturing technology of hand-made ware from three burial grounds in the South-Western Crimea, which functioned from the second half of the 1st to the late 4th – early 5th century AD: Kil-Dere 1, Sovkhoz 10 and Frontovoye 3. The study was guided by the historical and cultural approach based on the methodology developed by A.A. Bobrinsky. It was established that on the territory of the South-Western Crimea there were two cultural traditions of making hand-made ware during the late Roman period. Their common feature was the use of crushed shells as an artificial inclusion in the preparation of pastes. Points of difference between the identified traditions manifested themselves in the types of clays used, methods of their preparation before the formation of pastes, methods of processing the outer surface of the vessels, and methods of firing the products. One of the traditions dominates in the materials of the Kil-Dere 1 necropolis and prevails in the materials from the Sovkhoz 10 necropolis, while the second is massively represented in the Frontovoye 3 necropolis.
25
Vasilyeva, I. N., and A. V. Somov. "CERAMIC COMPLEXES OF THE NEOLITHIC SITE OF LUZHKI II: MORPHOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY (PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE STUDY)." Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. History Sciences 5, no. 4 (2023): 138–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.37313/2658-4816-2023-5-4-138-160.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents preliminary results of a study of ceramics from the recently discovered and studied Neolithic site of Luzhki II, which is located in the Sok river basin in the Krasnoyarsk district of the Samara Oblast. This site can be positioned as a relatively “homogeneous” archaeological object of the Middle and Late Neolithic era of the forest-steppe Volga region (Srednevolzhskaya culture). The analysis is based on materials from excavations of 2020-2022 years, which include 2,769 fragments of Neolithic ceramics. The study was carried out using an integrated approach, including morphological grouping of vessels; technical and technological analysis of pottery according to the methods by A.A. Bobrinsky (binocular microscopy, traceology and experiment in the form of physical modeling); methods of soil science and geology. Neolithic vessels were divided into main typological groups: post-Yelshan ceramic complex; pricked (with receding and sparse pricking); comb (with smooth and comb stamp); a “mixed” group of ceramics decorated with different ornamentation techniques was identified; one vessel with frame ornament was discovered. The article presents the characteristics of pottery technology within the identified ceramic complexes, the results of their comparative analysis, and conclusions of a historical and cultural nature.
26
Nikitina, Anna Valerievna. "Technological features of ceramic complex of 2nd fourth of I millennium AD of Sosenki settlement in the Ulyanovsk Region." Samara Journal of Science 6, no. 3 (September 1, 2017): 210–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv201763221.
Full textAbstract:
The following paper deals with typological and technological analyses of the pottery of the Sosenki settlement of the Ulyanovsk region. The author identified 3 morphological groups of vessels among the available material on the basis of external features that are based on vessels shape and surface treatment. Technical-and-technological analysis of ceramics, based on the methods of A.A. Bobrinsky, was carried out for the purpose of determining the characteristics of the initial raw material, traditions of composing the pasts and the character of the calcination of the vessels. The analysis of the preparatory stage of the pottery process confirmed the presence of some differences in the selected groups mainly related to the features of the dimension and calibration of grog in the paste. In conclusion, it is proposed to assign this complex to the Upper Don cultural traditions. However, it is pointed out that a very limited amount of material still requires only the introduction of a scientific use without focusing on cultural interpretations. Settlement dating based on mass material can not be determined smaller than within the C2-D2 phases. The settlement dates back to the pre-Imenkovo period and materials may find later echoes on the sites of Samara Bend.
27
D., Papin, Fedoruk A., Loman V., and Stepanova N. "Stuffed Ceramics of the Late Bronze Epoch of the Settlement of Burla-3." Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovaniy 33, no. 2 (2021): 175–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2021)33(2).-10.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with the results of a comprehensive analysis of the molded ceramics of the Burla-3 settlement of the Late Bronze Age, carried out according to the method of A. A. Bobrinsky. Based on the study of molding masses (FM) of ceramic vessels, it has been established that the pottery tradition is represented by several groups associated with populations of different origins. The main one is the autochthonous technology for the use of chamotte as additives, at the same time, foreign cultural methods for the use of gruss are distinguished. The methods of designing vessels made it possible to reveal that the technological scheme of the Sargary-Alekseevsk culture is dominant. Correlation of the obtained data with the ornamental scheme of the ceramic complex made it possible to distinguish several technological groups: “Sargary-Alekseevskaya”, “Dongal”, “Irmenskaya”, and hybrid types between them. Keywords: Burla-3, Ob-Irtysh interfluve, steppe Altai, ceramics, technical and technological analysis, Late Bronze Age Acknowledgments: The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 20–18–00179 “Migration and the Processes of Ethnocultural Interaction as Factors in the Formation of Multiethnic Societies on the Territory of the Greater Altai in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Archaeological and Anthropological Materials”.
28
Rakhimzhanova, Saule Zhangeldyevna. "TECHNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF ENEOLITHIC CERAMICS OF THE SETTLEMENT NOVOILYINKA III." Samara Journal of Science 4, no. 4 (December 1, 2015): 86–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv20154209.
Full textAbstract:
In the article is expounded the first results of the special technological research of eneolithic ceramics from excavation of the settlement of novoilyinka iii from northern Kulunda that is dated by the first half of the iii millennium Bc. the research of ceramics is conducted within historical and cultural approach by a.a. Bobrinskys technique by the steps of potters technology relating to a preparatory stage of production.the author recorded an existing on novoilyinka iiis settlement of carriers of different potters traditions in skills of selection and preparation of initial raw materials and drawing up forming mass of ceramics. the most peculiar feature of noboilynkas iii ceramics is an addition of a big quantity of fluff to the moldind mass. the similar cultural tradition in southern siberia isnt revealed yet. as a result of the analysis were revealed 9 different places of mining of initial raw materials. there were allocated 4 different cultural traditions of drawing up forming mass of ceramics. among the 4 allocated recipes of forming masses the most mass - clay + fluff + organic (75, 1%) that talks about a high degree of uniformity of carriers of potters traditions. there was a case where clay + chamotte+ gruss + organic were used by potters and that reflects the mixture of cultural traditions in the field of drawing up forming masses
29
Babenko, L. I., and O. V. Lifantii. "THE ATTRIBUTION OF FORGOTTEN ASSEMBLAGE FOUND NEAR VASYLKIV VILLAGE." Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine 33, no. 4 (December 25, 2019): 97–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2019.04.06.
Full textAbstract:
In 1895 Yulia F. Abaza made the archaeological excavations near Vasylkiv village of Zvenyhorod district. The found materials were given to the Archaeological museum of Kiev Saint Vladimir Imperial University that has not survived till nowadays. In 1899 these artefacts were presented as one Scythian burial mound assemblage at the 11th Archaeological Congress exhibition in Kyiv, though the analysis of collection’s items demonstrate their cultural and historical broad range. There are ca. fifteen vessels of Trypillia and one — of Middle Dnieper cultures. The biggest part of the assemblage under discussion is presented by two horizons of Scythian Age. Also one sword belongs to the Sarmatian culture. This diversity makes impossible to assume belonging of all described items to one archaeological complex.
A little bit later the finials (pole-tops) discovered by Yulia F. Abaza were published as finds from Kaniv district (B. I. and V. A. Khanenko) or as the finds from the Mezhirichka from Balta (A. A. Bobrinskii). The last passport was recognized by scholars and was repeated in a lot of analytical papers. However no paper mentioned these finials among the finds explored by Yu. F. Abaza in 1895 at the barrows near Mezhirichka village. It is absolutely clear now that their interpretation as the Mezhirichka’s finds was mistaken. The arguments on the matter are fully described in the paper.
Now due to our «investigation» the main part of collection of Yulia F. Abaza’s excavation in 1895 in Zvenyhorod district was reinvented again. Now almost all artefacts from this works near Vasylkiv village (modern Cherkasy Region of Ukraine) are kept in National Museum of Ukrainian History. The one finial was given in 1950 to M. F. Sumtsov Kharkiv Historical Museum.
30
Zastrozhnova, Evgenia G. "A.A. BOBRINSKY, K.E. DUMBERG AND V.V. SHKORPIL’S LETTERS TO V.V. LATYSHEV (IN THE ST. PETERSBURG BRANCH OF THE ARCHIVE OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES)." Journal of historical philological and cultural studies 1, no. 67 (March 31, 2020): 164–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.18503/1992-0431-2020-1-67-164-174.
Full text
31
Vasilieva, Irina Nikolaevna. "Ceramics making technology from the Eneolithic layers of Rakushechny Yar settlement." Samara Journal of Science 8, no. 2 (April 1, 2019): 114–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv201982205.
Full textAbstract:
The paper contains the results of the technical and technological analysis of ceramics from the Eneolithic layers of the Rakushechny Yar settlement. It is located on the Porechny Island (the Don River, Rostov Region, Russian Federation). The methodological basis of the conducted research is a historical and cultural approach to the study of ancient ceramics, developed in Russian archeology by A.A. Bobrinsky. The methods of the research are binocular microscopy, trasology and experiment (physical modeling). 141 samples of ceramics (conditionally separate vessels) from layers 5-2 of Rakushechny Yar were subjected to a microscopic examination. The obtained technological information allowed us to reconstruct techniques and methods of Eneolithic utensils manufacturing at all stages of production - preparatory, creative and fortifying stages of pottery technology. Based on these data, the paper presents a general description of the Eneolithic pottery. A comparative analysis was made of the pottery technology of the Neolithic and Eneolithic population that inhabited the Rakushechny Yar site. According to its results, the similarities and differences of the Eneolithic and Neolithic pottery traditions are highlighted. Particular attention is paid to the question of the possible origins of new traditions, which became widespread during the Eneolithic. These include silty clays selection traditions, the introduction of artificial additives into the molding composition: crushed shell, bird fluff and sand.
32
Sukhanov, Evgeny. "Shapes of сups from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the Middle Don." History, Archeology and Ethnography of the Caucasus 17, no. 2 (July 1, 2021): 455–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.32653/ch172455-479.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with the analysis of cup’s shapes of the Don Alans and their neighbors. The study was based on 186 vessels from cemeteries Dmitrievka, Nizhnie Lubyanki, Yutanovka, Chervonaya Gusarovka, and Mayatski complex. The methodology is based on the historical-and-cultural approach to the study of the vessel's shape, developed by A. A. Bobrinsky and supplemented by his modern followers. The shapes of the cups were studied at three analysis levels. These are the study of general proportions, vessel’s structure, and parameters of vessel’s functional parts.
The main result of this study is the identification of two traditions of сup shapes in the Middle Don. The first tradition is a relatively lower «body» and a relatively lower «shoulder/brachium». It is represented in cemeteries Nizhnie Lubyanki, Yutanovka, Chervonaya Gusarovka, and Mayatski complex. The second tradition is a relatively higher «body» and a relatively higher «shoulder/brachium». This tradition is only in Chervonaya Gusarovka.
The article attempts a chronological analysis of identified traditions based on the materials of cemeteries Dmitrievkа and Chervonaya Gusarovka. The cups made with different violations of mass traditions are typical for both relatively earlier and relatively later stages of sites. Another picture was shown by the cups that strictly correspond to the mass tradition at all levels of analysis. Such vessels are most characteristic of the early stages of Dmitrievkа and Chervonaya Gusarovka cemeteries.
33
Villar, José Ramón. "Boris BOBRINSKOY, Le mystère de l’Église. Cours de théologie dogmatique, Les Éditions du Cerf («Théologies»), Paris 2003, 315 pp., 15 x 24, ISBN 2-204-07091-2." Scripta Theologica 36, no. 1 (November 30, 2017): 321. http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/006.36.13825.
Full text
34
Tsaregradskaya, Tatiana V. "“Russian trace” in the work of Harrison Birtwistle." Contemporary Musicology, no. 4 (2019): 100–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.56620/2587-9731-2019-4-100-120.
Full textAbstract:
British composer Harrison Birtwistle from the very beginning of his composer`s career sought creative impulses from his ancestors, among which the most evident influence was produced by Russian composer Igor Stravinsky. But Stravinsky wasn`t the only composer of Russian origin important for Birtwistle as a source of inspiration. Another artist of Russian origin also became a powerful source of creative ideas for British composer. His name is Peter Zinoviev and this person became the first musician in Great Britain who began to produce experiments with electronic instruments and electronic music. His aristocratic roots (Zinoviev belongs to the aristocratic families of Bobrinskiys, Dolgorukovs, Zinovievs) played considerable role in his attitude to the complex problems of electronic music which were solved with genuinely Russian invention talent and courage. Besides working with technical problems like sound amplification, sound effects, sound engineering, scenic space development, Zinoviev also had global influence on Birtwistle: he produced two librettos (one – for chamber cantata “Nenia: The death of Orpheus; and the second – for grand opera “The Mask of Orpheus”). In these librettos musician and engineer showed as an erudite, profound interpreter of ancient mythology and at the same time as an artist with a taste for postvodernist ideas. “The Mask of Orpheus” became the last project of Zinoviev and Birtwistle. Nevertheless the impact of Peter Zinoviev is evident in a number of Birtwistle`s compositions which belong to so-called “Orpheus-project”, for example, in opera “The Corridor”.
35
Skory, S. A., R. V. Zimovets, and V. N. Okatenko. "THE BARROW 524 NEAR VILLAGE ZHABOTIN (New Research of the «Basic» Site of the Scythian Archaic Period in the Ukrainian Right-Bank Forest-Steppe)." Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine 36, no. 3 (June 1, 2020): 300–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2020.03.19.
Full textAbstract:
The first excavations on this barrow were carried out in 1913 by the famous archaeologist Alexei Bobrinskoy. The central part of the mound was excavated by the pit.
The base of rather large ground wooden tomb buried in antiquity has been discovered there. The surviving items (weapons, horse equipment, pottery, small gold jewelry) later made it possible to date this mound to the end of the 7th century BC or ca. 7th—6th centuries BC.
Since the late 1980s, there has been a tendency — and, in our opinion, incorrect — of rather sharp aging of the Central tomb, and, accordingly, of whole barrow 524 near the village Zhabotin. It began to date ca. 8th—7th centuries BC, 750—700 BC, not later than the end of the 8th century BC, and finally, ca. mid- 8th century BC.
The Zhabotin 524 barrow began to be interpreted as the basic funeral monument of the Scythian archaic period in the Dnieper Right-Bank Forest-Steppe.
In 2019, the complete study of the barrow was made. By the time of the excavation it had a height of 3.0 m with a diameter of 55 Ч 50 m.
During the study, 12 profiles of the mound were obtained. They provided complete picture of its construction. The mound was constructed from humus in 2 stages. The first mound was directly made over the Central tomb. Its diameter is 24 m, the reconstructed height is up to 4.0 m. The mound was lined with radially wooden blocks. The second mound with a diameter of up to 50 m was fixed below by clay crepe. Reconstructed height up to 7.0 m.
Information on the Central Tomb, according to the number of signs, and first of all — to the sizes, differ from the information published by A. Bobrinskoy.
The actual dimensions of the tomb are not 35 m2, but 22 m2. From the southeast and northwest to the Central Tomb two ritual wooden platforms adjoined, one of which was badly burned. Next to them is open burial 2, covered by a tree. The male skeleton (14—18 years old) lay in the contracted position, without any goods. In our opinion, this burial should be considered as the sacrifice to the main noble deceased — a heavily armed Scythian equestrian warrior buried in the Central Tomb.
A few items from the Central Tomb were also found — bronze scales of the armour, the fragment of iron sword, but most important is the bronze plate in the form of a bull’s head and the amphora handle. Judging by the composition of clay, it belongs to the vessels of Eastern Greek production. These findings are of fundamental importance: they cannot be dated by the time earlier than the late of the 7th century BC.
This situation made us once again turn to the most significant products, the so-called chronological indicators, discovered in 1913, on the basis of which the number of researchers were dated the Zhabotin 524 mound until the mid- 8th century BC.
These are arrow-heads, horse trappings, appliquйs decorated in animal style. Their analysis shows that these artifacts are not convincing arguments for such an early date for the barrow.
36
Sukhanov, Evgeny V. "CULTURAL TRADITIONS OF JUG SHAPES AMONG DON ALANS." History, Archeology and Ethnography of the Caucasus 16, no. 3 (November 1, 2020): 639–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.32653/ch163639-660.
Full textAbstract:
Jars are the most extensive category of earthenware from catacomb burial grounds of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture. They have greatest variety of shapes among others categories of ceramics. Thе article is devoted to the study of the 211 jars shapes from six catacomb burial grounds of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture. The research is based on the historical-and-cultural approach to the study of the vessels shape, developed by A. A. Bobrinsky and supplemented by his modern followers. The aim of ceramics study in this approach is to reconstruct specific cultural traditions of manufacturers and consumers of pottery, as well as to study the history of the population in ancient times based on data about these cultural traditions.
The catacomb burial grounds studied here are divided into two groups. The core of the first group is Dmitrievsky and Nizhnelubyansky burial grounds. Podgorovsky burial ground has many similarities with sites listed above. The second group consisted of Starosaltovsky, Rubezhansky and Yutanovsky burial grounds. These groups is fully consistent with the grouping based on burial traditions of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture. According to G. E. Afanasiev these burial traditions are associated with different tribal groups of the Don Alans.
The main conclusion is that the various mass traditions of the jars shapes mark the differences in the skills among potters from different Alans tribal groups who settled in the middle - second half of the VIII century in the Middle Don basin. They show the connection of different cultural traditions with specific ancient human collectives.
37
MAMAEV, Khamid Magomedovich, and Rashid Khamidovich MAMAEV. "ABOUT ONE OF THE EPISODES OF THE BEGINNING OF STUDYING THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS OF GROZNY AND ITS SURROUNDINGS." Herald of Daghestan Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Science, no. 81 (June 30, 2021): 18–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.31029/vestdnc81/3.
Full textAbstract:
This article is devoted to the one of the most significant moments of the beginning of the history of discovery and study of the archaeological monuments and artifacts on the territory of Grozny and its suburbs in the end of the 1880-th, correlated with wide spread of illegal excavations on the territory of the Terek district (Terskaya) and visiting this site by the directors of the main archaeological structures of Russia - count A.A. Bobrinsky (Imperial Archaeological Commission, St. Petersburg) and countess P.S. Uvarova (Imperial Moscow Archaeological Society (Moscow). The immediate reason for such attention was the rumors that reached the center about a find of the golden "crown" by treasure hunters in one of the mound near the village of Kulary on the river Sunzha. The Terek regional and district administrations of Grozny actively participated in the search. One of the officials, Yu.K. Churakovsky, also took active part in the research of local archaeological sites carried out by the Imperial Archaeological Commission and the Imperial Moscow Archaeological Society, as well as in the collection of numerous artifacts recovered by robbers from the mounds on the Chechen Plain in 1887-1888. In the end, the «crown», having become the necklace of Early Sarmatian period (E.I. Krupnov, V.B. Vinogradov, M.P. Abramova) came to P.S. Uvarova and was later transferred to the State Historical Museum. Twists and turns of the story are preserved in the correspondence of P.S. Uvarova to Yu.K. Churakovsky, once again confirming the importance of the epistolary heritage in the study of the process of the formation of archeology in Russia.
38
Batueva, Nadezhda S., and Dmitry V. Shmuratko. "Ceramic traditions on the territory of the Permian Urals during the Great Migration of Peoples: application of technical, technological and statistical analyses." Samara Journal of Science 12, no. 3 (December 1, 2023): 153–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.55355/snv2023123203.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents the results of technical, technological and statistical analyses of ceramics from the epoch of the Great Migration of Peoples found on the monuments of the Permian Urals. The technical and technological analysis was carried out within the framework of the historical and cultural approach developed by A.A. Bobrinsky. Statistical analysis of the sample, including 136 vessels from 10 archaeological sites, using the k-means method allowed us to talk about a motley and diverse cultural palette of the population of the studied territory. The authors identified 8 clusters, each of which can be identified with a particular cultural tradition of pottery making. The analyzed ceramic material allows us to talk about the mixing of at least two groups of the population, one of which is associated with the tradition of using crushed shells in the production of ceramics, and the second – manure, organic solution, chamotte and dry processing of the initial plastic raw materials. The intertwining of traditions is clearly recorded by the facts of the identification of mixed multicomponent compositions of molding masses (clay + crushed shell + organic solution; clay + crushed shell + chamotte; clay + crushed shell + chamotte + organic solution). According to the results of the analysis, local ceramic traditions were also recorded, demonstrating the high dependence of ceramic production technology on available raw materials (sanded clay raw materials; silty clays). In the course of the study, the tradition of using crushed raw materials in the production of ceramics was described and interpreted, the origins of which may be associated with the area of distribution of the Mazunin culture.
39
Mateo Seco, Lucas Francisco. "Boris BOBRINSKOY, La compassion du Pêre. Introduction par Maxime Egger, Éd. du Cerf («Le sel de la terre»), Paris 2003, 197 pp., 15 x 21, ISBN 2-204-06424-6." Scripta Theologica 36, no. 3 (November 30, 2017): 989. http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/006.36.13800.
Full text
40
Клемешова, М. Е., Г. В. Требелева, and Г. Ю. Юрков. "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NATURAL RAW MATERIALS AND CERAMIC ITEMS FROM THE EXCAVATIONS OF THE MARKULA HILLFORT AND THE POTTERY PRODUCTION CENTER NEAR THE ATARA VILLAGE IN EASTERN ABKHAZIA." Краткие сообщения Института археологии (КСИА), no. 272 (May 20, 2024): 291–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.25681/ia5a6.0130-2620.272.291-310.
Full textAbstract:
В статье представлены результаты сравнительного анализа керамических изделий, образцов природной глины и песка Маркульского городища и гончарного центра у с. Атара, расположенных в Восточной Абхазии. Исследования проводились с использованием методики, разработанной А. А. Бобринским, и рентгенофазового анализа для проверки полученных ранее данных об особенностях природного сырья для изготовления керамики из этого района. Проведенные анализы подтвердили присутствие в природном сырье (глине и песке) и керамике этих двух памятников значительного количества песка из рудных минералов гематита и гетита, концентрация которых в обожженной керамике достигает 5-7 мас. % гематитового песка. Этот признак может считаться маркером керамики, изготовленной в геологическом районе, частью которого является территория к востоку от р. Кодор между Мар-кульским городищем и с. Атара. Выявлены общие традиции изготовления керамики на этих памятниках (формовочные массы «глина + песок + органический раствор») и наличие одинаковых клейм на пифосах. Сделан вывод о присутствии в III-XIV вв. на этих территориях одного и того же населения и существовании там различных центров гончарного производства. The paper provides results of the comparative analysis of the ceramic items, samples of natural clay and sand from the Markula hillfort and the pottery production center near the Atara village located in Eastern Abkhazia. The studies were carried out using the methodology developed by A. A. Bobrinskiy and X-ray diffraction analysis to verify the earlier data on distinctive features of the natural raw material used to produce ceramics in this district. These analyses confirmed presence of substantial quantities of sand from hematite and goethite which are ore minerals, in the natural raw material (clay and sand) and the ceramics retrieved from these two sites. The concentration of hematite and goethite in the baked ceramics amounts to 5-7 wt% of hematite sand. This characteristic can be considered as a signature of the ceramics made in the geological district that also includes the area east of the Kodor river between the Markula hillfort and the Atara village. The analysis identified common traditions of ceramic making at these sites (clay + sand + organic solution) and use of the same stamps on the pithoi; it can be also inferred from the analysis that in the 3rd-14th centuries the same population inhabited this area where various pottery production centers functioned.
41
Ilyushina, Virnjria Vladimirovna. "THE TECHNOLOGY OF POTTERY PRODUCTION OF THE POPULATION OF THE ALAKUL CULTURE OF THE SETTLEMENT NIJNEINGALSKOE-3 IN THE LOWER TOBOL REGION." Samara Journal of Science 4, no. 4 (December 1, 2015): 47–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv20154205.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of the technology of pottery production of the population of alakul culture of the settlement nijneingalskoe-3 in the lower tobol region. the analysis is made within the framework of historical and cultural approach and the structure of the pottery industry, developed by a.a. Bobrinsky. as a result of the study of the pottery revealed that the potters of alakul culture selected natural iron- enriched clay and silty clay containing natural admixture of rivers shell. during compiling of molding masses most often the potters used a fire clay and various organic additives, rarely they used a gruss and calcified bone. in the collection there are just 3 of the bottom part of the vessels, which gave information on the construction aseed-body. they were made from clay patches in accordance with the bottom-capacitive program. the hollow body of the 10 vessels was made with clay patches too. the surface of vessels were treated with wooden and bone spatulas, stamps and cloth or fingers of potters. after smoothing the surface, and in some cases the inner surface of the vessels was glossing on the dry basis. Firing of finished products was manufactured in a simple piles or hearths. Following the results of the comparative analysis of the pottery traditions of the settlements citizens, their mixed characters in selecting the plastic raw material and composing the molding masses havebeen discovered. the comparison of the data with the technological information about ceramics assemblages from the neighboring regions showed that the citizens of the alakul culture are considered to be aliens on the territory of the lower tobol region.
42
Stashenkov, Dmitry Alekseevich, Anna Fedorovna Kochkina, Lyudmila Valentinovna Kuznetsova, Natalya Petrovna Salugina, and Aleksey Alekseevich Lastovsky. "Troitskoye 5 - a new archaeological site of the Stone-Bronze Age in the Samara Volga region." Samara Journal of Science 11, no. 1 (March 1, 2022): 201–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.55355/snv2022111208.
Full textAbstract:
In the course of an exploratory survey of the left bank of the Chapaevka River on the territory of the Bezenchuksky District in the Samara Region in 2020-2021, a multilayer archaeological site of the Stone and Bronze Ages Troitskoye 5 was discovered. The archaeological site is located not far from the previously studied sites of Troitskoye 1 and Troitskoye 2. On the territory of the archaeological site, stratigraphic pits were laid, the boundaries were determined, and lifting material was collected. The main cultural layer of the Troitskoye 5 site belongs to the Stone Age. On the territory of the stone age site a settlement of the Srubnaya culture of the Bronze Age arose later. The paper deals with the analysis of the resulting collection of flint tools and ceramic material. It is concluded that the surveyed settlement contains cultural layers of two eras: the Stone and Bronze Ages. The absence of typical labor tools, clear stratigraphic references, and bone remains make it difficult to determine the time of the early settlement. Preliminarily, its existence can be assumed within the broad framework of the final Paleolithic-Neolithic. It is possible that the existence of at least part of the complex of stone artifacts from the settlement of Troitskoye 5 is associated with the Mesolithic era. In general, the complex of material from the Troitskoye 5 site corresponds to the materials obtained earlier during the survey of the Troitskoye 1 and Troitskoye 2 sites. The finds of the Bronze Age are represented by fragments of pottery typical of the Srubna culture of the middle of the 2nd millennium BC. The technical and technological analysis of ceramics was carried out within the framework of the historical and cultural approach, the main provisions of which were developed and introduced into scientific circulation by A.A. Bobrinsky.
43
Vybornov, Aleksandr, Irina Vasilyeva, Marianna Kulkova, Markku Oinonen, Göran Possnert, and Larisa Nesterova. "About Ancient Ceramic Traditions of the Population of the Northern Caspian Region." Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, no. 1 (February 2020): 141–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2020.1.12.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. The territory of the Northern Caspian region plays an important role in the study of the Neolithic of Eastern Europe. The main criterion of this period is clay pottery. One of the difficult issues is the time of the ceramic technology appearance. Methods and materials. The study of the pottery technology of the Neolithic population of the Northern Caspian region is carried out in the framework of the historical and cultural approach to the study of ceramics, according to the method of A. Bobrinsky. The technique is based on binocular microscopy, tracology and experiment in the form of physical modeling. The basis for identifying technological traces on ceramics is the comparative analysis of the vessels under study with the base of standards. It is made by means of physical modeling in field and laboratory conditions. The age of the Neolithic monuments was determined using traditional methods in radiocarbon laboratories in Russia and Ukraine, as well as using AMS at universities in Sweden and Finland. Analysis. Over the past 10 years, more than 68 radiocarbon dates on different materials such as charcoal, bones, organics from ceramics, charred crusts, humus have been obtained. They give the possibility to determine the time of appearance and spread of the earliest pottery in the Northern Caspian region. This is the middle 7th millennium BC. The chronological framework for the development of the Neolithic in the Northern Caspian region is ca. 6600–5500 BC. The paper establishes the main and specific features of ceramic traditions. Results.The technical and technological analysis allows to reveal the genesis, the features of dynamics and further development of pottery in this region. The complex of results obtained allows to attribute the Neolithic sites of the Caspian region to the earliest pottery areal in Eastern Europe.
44
Stepanova, N. F., D. V. Papin, and A. S. Fedoruk. "Original Findings from the Burla-3 Settlement of the Late Bronze Age." Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories 27 (2021): 656–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.17746/2658-6193.2021.27.0656-0661.
Full textAbstract:
The article discusses the results of the study of the original findings from the Late Bronze Age settlement Burla-3, located in the northern part of the Kulunda steppe of the Altai Territory. These are the bottoms of two vessels. Their thickness is unusual exceeding the thickness of bottoms of standard vessels by 3-3.5 times. The vessels were probably of unusual size, i.e. very large. A technical and technological analysis of the ceramics was carried out according to the method of A.A. Bobrinsky in order to compare the initial raw materials and the composition of molding masses with ceramics of different cultural and chronological groups from this site. As a result, it was established that they were made following an unusual recipe: clay + chamotte + organic matter of plant origin + animal hair. Several vessels were used for chamotte, one of which, in terms of raw materials, fully corresponds to one of the stands from the settlement. The technical and technological analysis of the remaining samples confirmed the previously recorded cultural traditions and skills in the selection of raw materials and the preparation of molding masses and revealed unusual—the addition of grit to one of the vessels made on a potter’s wheel, as well as several cases of the use of plant organic matter in high concentrations and animal hair. For this site, both the use of chamotte and the addition of animal hair are not typical. Organics of plant origin in this concentration are also rare. The obtained results confirm that the processes of interaction between different groups of the population took place at the site. The conclusion about the existence of a pottery center specializing in the production of circular ceramics in Altai in the Late Bronze Age is substantiated.
45
I., Savko. "Technology of Production of Ceramics of the Andronovo (Fedorovo) Culture of the Steppe and Forest-Steppe Altai (on the materials of research of the historical and cultural approach)." Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovaniy 33, no. 2 (2021): 193–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2021)33(2).-11.
Full textAbstract:
Based on the analysis of publications devoted to the study of ceramics of the Andronovo (Fedorovo) culture of the steppe and forest-steppe Altai, the article considers the peculiarities of pottery production, studied within the framework of the historical and cultural direction developed by A. A. Bobrinsky. Using the historical and cultural approach, the researchers studied the ceramic complexes of twelve settlements and two burial grounds of the Andronovo (Fedorovo) culture of Altai, totaling 559 vessels. On the basis of the published studies, the article gives a general characteristic of the technology for the manufacture of Andronovo ceramics of Altai is given, and identifies the main directions of research work reflecting the approaches to the analysis of the material considered. The available data on the technology of making dishes of the Andronovo (Fedorovo) culture allow us to say about the prospects of studying this topic from the standpoint of the historical and cultural direction. A. A. Bobrinsky’s approach makes it possible to draw conclusions about cultural traditions in pottery, reconstruct the directions of migration and reveal the mixing of population groups, which will contribute to solving the issues of the origin and periodization of the Fedorov culture not only of the steppe and forest-steppe Altai, but also of the entire area of distribution of the Andronovo cultural and historical community. Key words: Andronovo culture, Fedorovo culture, ceramics, historical and cultural approach, history of study Acknowledgments: This work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 20–18–00179 “Migration and the Processes of Ethnocultural Interaction as Factors in the Formation of Multiethnic Societies on the Territory of the Greater Altai in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Interdisciplinary Analysis of Archaeological and Anthropological Materials”.
46
Vasilyeva, Irina N., Anatoly V. Somov, Daria I. Vasilieva, and Margarita N. Baranova. "Multidisciplinary approach to the study of Neolithic pottery technology (based on the materials of the Luzhki II site)." Samara Journal of Science 12, no. 3 (December 1, 2023): 139–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.55355/snv2023123202.
Full textAbstract:
The excavations of a new Neolithic site in the Samara Volga region, conducted by archaeologists of Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education in 2020–2023, yielded numerous ceramic materials, a comprehensive analysis of which is currently being conducted. The results of the technical and technological analysis of ceramics according to the method of A.A. Bobrinsky and the specifics of the geographical location of the Luzhki II site led to the appeal to more detailed methods of study. In addition to archaeological (morphological grouping of vessels, typology, technical and technological analysis of ceramics based on binocular microscopy, tracology and physical modeling), the methods of geology (petrography, X-ray phase analysis) and paleosolvology were used in the study. The results of the multidisciplinary approach to the study of Neolithic pottery technology are presented in this article. They suggested that a small site without stationary dwellings could be used as a seasonal place for making household utensils (in addition to the usual hunting and fishing activities). As a result of the technical and technological analysis of pottery ceramics of the Luzhki II site, a significant proximity of the pottery traditions of the population groups who left different ceramic complexes was revealed, which indicates the simultaneity of their existence in this area and active mixing processes. The archaization of the potters' ideas about plastic raw materials is noted – a return to more archaic methods: the share of the use of silt in the production of post-Yelshan ceramic complex lot is 82%; pricked – 75%; combed – 89%; «mixed» group – 83%. From the point of view of the historical and cultural approach, such a result could arise only because of the appearance in the southern Middle Volga of new groups of Neolithic population with archaic ideas about raw materials.
47
Selin, Dmitry, Alexander Lebedintsev, Pavel Grebenyuk, and Alexander Fedorchenko. "Ceramics of the Old Bering Sea Culture from the Kozhevnikov Cliff Site (Cape Schmidt): Features of Pottery Technology." Nizhnevolzhskiy Arheologicheskiy Vestnik, no. 2 (June 2024): 161–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2024.2.8.
Full textAbstract:
During the excavations of a dugout at the Kozhevnikov Cliff site (Cape Schmidt), N.N. Dikov obtained a collection of pottery vessels of the Old Bering Sea culture (fourteen specimens). The technology of ceramic production was analyzed using the methodology developed by A.A. Bobrinsky. It was determined that potters selected iron-rich clays of two subtypes, differing in the amount of natural sand content, for pottery production. Five recipes for the molding clay were identified, including three unmixed: 1) clay + sand (7 specimens); 2) clay + wool (3 specimens); 3) clay + organic solution (2 specimens); and two mixed – 4) clay + sand + organic solution (1 specimen); and 5) clay + sand + wool (1 specimen). The vessels were made in a base form, and the shape was additionally formed by paddling. On the outer surface of one artifact, a strap handle with an ear for threading a cord was made, and the remaining hole on the inside was patched with a cloth scrap. The surfaces of the vessels were treated by mechanical smoothing with a hard-smooth tool and/or fingers. Firing took place at temperatures above clay calcination and could be done in bonfires or hearths. The heterogeneity of pottery traditions was found among the population living in the dugout. The two identified two-component recipes for molding clay were formed as a result of mixing the adaptive pottery skills of bearers of different traditions of making unmixed recipes for molding clay. This indicates the beginning of cultural integration processes among bearers of different pottery skills that began to occur under the dominance of the tradition of using low-sanded clay of the first subtype and artificial sand addition in a 1 : 1 concentration.
48
Селин, Д. В. "Kulai Ceramics from Settlements in the Novosibirsk Ob Region: Technological Distinctive Traits." Краткие сообщения Института археологии (КСИА), no. 268 (June 10, 2023): 146–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.25681/iaras.0130-2620.268.146-161.
Full textAbstract:
В статье представлены результаты технико-технологического анализа поселенческой керамики кулайской культуры в Новосибирском Приобье. Целью является реконструкция содержания ступеней гончарного производства у носителей новосибирского варианта кулайской КИО с поселенческих памятников Новосибирского Приобья. Технико-технологический анализ проводился по методике, предложенной А. А. Бобринским. Установлено, что гончары на разных поселениях отбирали сырье из разных глинищ, обладали близкими навыками конструирования полого тела и обжига, приемами обработки поверхностей. Это позволяет предположить общность традиций населения, оставившего эти памятники. Различия в традициях составления формовочный массы на разных поселениях могут быть связаны как с разным хронологическим возрастом памятников, так и с взаимодействием носителей новосибирского варианта кулайской культурно-исторической общности с другими культурными группами. Наибольшее сходство в технологии изготовления посуды прослеживается между могильником Каменный Мыс и поселением Дубровинский Борок-4. Это может свидетельствовать о том, что эти памятники близки друг другу хронологически и могли быть оставлены одной локальной группой. The paper describes the technical and technological analysis of Kulai ceramics from settlements in the Novosibirsk Ob region. Its aim is to reconstruct the pottery production process developed by the Novosibirsk variant of the Kulai culture from the settlement sites in the Novosibirsk Ob region. The technical and technological analysis was performed based on the methodology proposed by A. A. Bobrinsky. The analysis found that at various settlements the potters selected raw material from various clay pits, they had similar skills of constructing a hollow body and firing, and surface treatment methods. All this suggests common traditions of the population that left behind these sits. Differences in preparing clay paste at various settlements can be linked to chronological differences of the sites as well as contacts between the Novosibirsk group of the Kulai culture and other cultural groups. The Kamenny Mys cemetery and the Dubrovinsky Borok-4 settlement demonstrate the closest similarity in clay vessel production technology. It may be an evidence of these cultures being close chronologically, it also suggests that they were probably left behind by the same local group.
49
A., Grishin, Marchenko Zh., and Stepanova N. "PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGE CERAMICS FROM THE KROKHALEVKA-5, 11 SITE (THE NORTH OF THE UPPER OB RIVER REGION)." Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovaniy 35, no. 2 (June 2023): 22–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2023)35(2).-02.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents the first results of a study of a sample of ceramics from the burial ground and the settlement of Krokhalevka-5, 11 (north of the Upper Ob region). The studies were carried out within the framework of the historical and cultural approach according to the method of A.A. Bobrinsky. The main task was to determine the specifics of cultural traditions in the selection of raw materials, the preparation of molding masses, the features of the working edge of ornaments by their imprints and a comparative analysis of the data obtained. The study was conducted of 22 specimens, belonging to five cultural and chronological groups of the Neolithic — Bronze Age: Kiprinskaya, Krokhalevskaya, Odinovskaya and Krotovskaya, the fifth group combines ceramics with an unclear cultural attribution of the early — developed Bronze Age. Most of the fragments come from open or conditionally closed (pits, ditch) archaeological contexts, and most oft en from the soil layer. It has been established that for the manufacture of ceramics, ferruginous clays with different amounts of natural sand impurities were used. 8 recipes for the composition of molding masses have been recorded. Clay + grus + organic solution prevails. The local traditions include the addition of crushed stone, and the brought ones — fireclay. In the earliest ceramic groups of the site, an unusual tradition of adding animal hair was revealed, which has analogies on the sites of the northern foothills of the Altai and other territories in the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages. The highest degree of similarity was noted for the Kiprinskaya and Krokhalevskaya vessels with ceramic complexes of the northern foothills of the Altai, the Upper Ob region and the north of the Kulunda steppe, both in terms of the composition of the molding masses and the tools for applying the ornament. The data obtained are of great importance for the characterization of the ceramic complexes of the Neolithic — Early Bronze Age in Siberia.
50
Салугина, Н. П., Н. Л. Моргунова, and А. А. Файзуллин. "NEW DATA ON THE POTTERY OF THE YAMNAYA CULTURE OF THE SOUTHERN URALS." Краткие сообщения Института археологии (КСИА), no. 272 (May 20, 2024): 261–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.25681/iaras.0130-2620.272.261-275.
Full textAbstract:
В статье представлены результаты технологического анализа керамики ямной культуры из кургана 1 курганного могильника Болдыревского IV в Оренбургской области. Конструкция кургана уникальна. Две ранние насыпи с погребениями детей были перекрыты огромным курганом над другим, более поздним захоронением взрослых людей. Керамика обнаружена в детских погребениях под малыми насыпями, во рвах и в насыпи кургана. Технологический анализ керамики, проведенный по методике А. А. Бобринского в рамках историко-культурного подхода, выявил навыки труда гончаров на всех ступенях технологического процесса. Сопоставление полученных данных с особенностями ранее изученной технологии керамики ямной культуры разных этапов ее развития позволило отнести исследованные сосуды к развитому этапу ямной культуры. Близость субстратных навыков на ступени конструирования свидетельствует о культурной близости населения, сложившейся в прошлом, еще на этапе становления ямной культуры. Но внутри себя это население было неоднородным, состоящим как минимум из двух родовых групп. Об этом свидетельствуют разные представления об исходном пластичном сырье и особенности составления формовочных масс. Проведенный технологический анализ позволяет заключить, что малые насыпи сооружены в короткий промежуток времени родственными группами населения, принадлежавшими к самостоятельным родовым коллективам. Археологические данные не противоречат данному выводу. The article presents the results of the technological analysis of the ceramics of the Yamaya culture from kurgan 1 of Boldyrevskiy IV cemetery in the Orenburg region. The construction of the kurgan is unique. Two early mounds with children’s burials were overlaid by a huge mound made over another burial of adults constructed later. Ceramics were found in children’s burials placed under small mounds, in the ditches and in the mound. The technological analysis of ceramics carried out according to the methodology developed by A. A. Bobrinskiy within the framework of the historical and cultural approach revealed the skills of potters at all stages of the technological process. Comparison of the obtained data with the specific traits of pottery-making technology of the Yamaya culture at different stages of its development made it possible to attribute the studied vessels to the developed stage of the culture. Similarity of the substrate skills at the design stage indicates the cultural proximity of the population that formed earlier, at the formative stage of the Yamaya culture. However, the Yamnaya population was not homogeneous, it consisted of at least two kin groups. This is evidenced by differences in the plastic raw material and specific features of clay composition of the molding masses. It can be deduced from the technological analysis that the smaller mounds were constructed during a short period of time by related groups that belonged to independent kin communities. Archaeological data do not contradict this conclusion.