Relevant bibliographies by topics / Authorship studies / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Authorship studies'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Authorship studies.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 18 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Authorship studies.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Ciorogar, Alex. "Authorship Studies and Romanticism." Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia 64, no. 4 (December 15, 2019): 231–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2019.4.14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Adams, Mary Alice. "Authorship in composition studies." IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49, no. 4 (December 2006): 375–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2006.885875.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bhagat, Vijay. "Women Authorship of Scholarly Publications in STEMM: Authorship Puzzle." Feminist Research 2, no. 2 (June 16, 2019): 66–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.21523/gcj2.18020204.

Full text
Abstract:
The continued underrepresentation of women in scholarly activities slows down the scientific progress of any country. Several studies have analyzed the women representation in authorship of scholarly publications in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine (STEMM). Women account only 30% of overall authorship of scholarly articles. Prestigious authorships like first-, last- and corresponding authors also show significant underrepresentation of women. Women as first authors are significantly increasing since last decades; however, growth of last authors is not significant and share of corresponding authors not changed. Women show low overall impact of scholarly publications due to lower productivity but not for quality of publication. This gender authorship puzzle can be solved by adopting gender responsive planning and management. Therefore, systematic efforts to understand the gender disparities in scholarly publications, authorship citations and collaborations require for achieving significant positive change in the share of women in academic authorship, impact and career. The field is new, active, attractive and interesting area of research to achieve gender equality in scientific research and publications for social welfare.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Berensmeyer, Ingo, Gert Buelens, Marysa Demoor, Ingo Berensmeyer, Gert Buelens, and Marysa Demoor. "Introduction Authorship as Cultural Performance: New Perspectives in Authorship Studies." Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 60, no. 1 (January 2012): 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zaa.2012.60.1.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

ELMANARELBOUANANI, Sara, and Ismail KASSOU. "Authorship Analysis Studies: A Survey." International Journal of Computer Applications 86, no. 12 (January 16, 2014): 22–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/15038-3384.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

McMenamin, Gerald R. "Style markers in authorship studies." Forensic Linguistics 8, no. 2 (December 2001): 93–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/sll.2001.8.2.93.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Liesegang, Thomas J., Andrew P. Schachat, and Daniel M. Albert. "Defining Authorship for Group Studies." Ophthalmology 117, no. 8 (August 2010): 1469–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Liesegang, Thomas J. "Defining Authorship for Group Studies." Archives of Ophthalmology 128, no. 8 (August 1, 2010): 1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.159.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Champney, Thomas H. "Authorship guidelines for anatomical studies." Clinical Anatomy 30, no. 4 (March 20, 2017): 429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.22838.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Usman, Muhammad Kabiru. "Authorship Pattern in Interdisciplinary Studies." International Journal of Library and Information Services 7, no. 2 (July 2018): 34–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijlis.2018070103.

Full text
Abstract:
The study was carried out to examine articles published in Bayero Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies (BJIS). The study was carried out quantitatively, 61 articles published in the Bayero Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies from 2008- 2013 were surveyed to carry out the study and descriptive statistics was used to make analysis. The collaboration of authors discovered in BJIS has very little implication for the national integration of Nigeria, 65.6% of articles published in BJIS were single authored and 75.4% of authors in BJIS come from the north-west region of Nigeria. 4 geographical regions of Nigeria were covered, while 2 were not covered at all in the journal. Data shows that knowledge transfer occur when authors from other regions publish in the north-west region where BJIS is published. It is recommended that publishers should carry out frequent assessment of where the articles they publish emanate from and use such assessment to achieve balance in the spread, visibility and patronage of their journal.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Liesegang, Thomas J., Andrew P. Schachat, and Daniel M. Albert. "Defining Authorship for Group Studies." American Journal of Ophthalmology 150, no. 2 (August 2010): 135–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Selleri, Andrea. "Authorship." Victorian Literature and Culture 46, no. 3-4 (2018): 580–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1060150318000293.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Wheaton, Hilary. "Conceiving sexual authorship." Porn Studies 3, no. 1 (January 2, 2016): 50–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2015.1119959.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Juola, Patrick, John Sofko, and Patrick Brennan. "A Prototype for Authorship Attribution Studies." Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 21, no. 2 (April 12, 2006): 169–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fql019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Garcia, A. M., and J. C. Martin. "Function Words in Authorship Attribution Studies." Literary and Linguistic Computing 22, no. 1 (November 14, 2006): 49–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fql048.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Geller, M. J. "Astronomy and authorship." Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 53, no. 2 (June 1990): 209–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0041977x00026033.

Full text
Abstract:
A new edition of the astronomical compilation MUL.APIN follows closely upon the recent publication of two sections of the large compendium of Babylonian astronomical omens known as Enūma Anu Enlil. The text of MUL.APIN likewise includes a section of astronomical omens, as well as a catalogue of stars, including the ‘fixed’ (ziqpu) stars, and information regarding the planets, heliacal risings, the path of the moon, calendrical intercalations, and a shadow table and water clock. This modern edition is clearly presented nd well-translated, and includes notes on both the philology and astronomy of the text.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Juola, Patrick. "Authorship Studies and the Dark Side of Social Media Analytics." JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science 26, no. 1 (January 28, 2020): 156–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jucs.2020.009.

Full text
Abstract:
The computational analysis of documents to learn about their authorship (also known as authorship attribution and/or authorship profiling) is an increasingly important area of research and application of technology. This paper discusses the technology, focusing on its application to social media in a variety of disciplines. It includes a brief survey of the history as well as three tutorial case studies, and discusses several significant applications and societal benefits that authorship analysis has brought about. It further argues, though, that while the benefits of this technology have been great, it has created serious risks to society that have not been sufficiently considered, addressed, or mitigated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Lamp, Jeffrey S. "Lukan Authorship of Hebrews." Pneuma 33, no. 2 (2011): 300–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/027209611x575177.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Lámbarry-Vilchis, Fernando, and Juan Carlos Moreno-Jiménez. "Co-authorship network of national researchers of Social Sciences in Mexico." Revista de la Universidad del Zulia 11, no. 31 (October 1, 2020): 8–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.31.02.

Full text
Abstract:
In Mexico, the most outstanding researchers are distinguished by the National Council of Science and Technology. Although, in the international literature, researcher's co-authorship networks and their impact on efficacy have been studied, in Mexico this type of studies is showing a greater boom, so the objective of this paper is to analyze the structure of the network of co-authorships of the researchers in Social Sciences level 3 of the country. For this purpose, the research method was based on the theory of networks and specifically on topology metrics. One of the conclusions of the research is that the researchers under study publish in a similar proportion individually or collaboratively, configuring a fragmented co-authorship network with a main component with properties that are explained by both the small-world and the free-scale model.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Köseoglu, Mehmet Ali, Fevzi Okumus, Eka Diraksa Putra, Mehmet Yildiz, and Ismail Cagri Dogan. "Authorship Trends, Collaboration Patterns, and Co-Authorship Networks in Lodging Studies (1990–2016)." Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 27, no. 5 (December 5, 2017): 561–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2018.1399192.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Sessions, W. L. "The Authorship of Faith." Religious Studies 27, no. 1 (March 1991): 81–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500001335.

Full text
Abstract:
Let us think of faith theistically, or at any rate Christianly, as an all-embracing personal relationship between a human person and the divine person, God. Such a relationship essentially involves some act ostensibly ‘by’ the human person and directed towards God – for example, an act of believing propositions about God because one believes God because one loves (‘believes unto’) God. Among many puzzles about this conception of faith, there is one which concerns the authorship of faith; this problem may be initially expressed as a question: Who is the agent-cause or ‘author’ of the essential act(s) of faith? There seem to be religiously compelling reasons for each of two diametrically opposed views.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

THIEL, JOHN E. "THEOLOGICAL AUTHORSHIP: POSTMODERN ALTERNATIVES?" Heythrop Journal 30, no. 1 (January 1989): 32–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.1989.tb01111.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Crase, Darrell. "Authorship analysis ofdeath studies, volumes 1–14." Death Studies 16, no. 3 (May 1992): 199–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07481189208252570.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Rudman, Joseph. "Cherry Picking in Nontraditional Authorship Attribution Studies." CHANCE 16, no. 2 (March 2003): 26–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2003.10554845.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Henry, Brandon Michael, and Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski. "Response to: “Authorship guidelines for anatomical studies”." Clinical Anatomy 30, no. 4 (March 25, 2017): 430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.22860.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Fine, Richard. "Authorship Cross-Examined by Critical Legal Studies." Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines 78, no. 1 (1998): 60–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rfea.1998.1749.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Aliukonis, Vygintas, Margarita Poškutė, and Eugenijus Gefenas. "Perish or Publish Dilemma: Challenges to Responsible Authorship." Medicina 56, no. 3 (March 12, 2020): 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56030123.

Full text
Abstract:
Controversies related to the concept and practice of responsible authorship and its misuse have been among the most prominent issues discussed in the recent literature on research integrity. Therefore, this paper aims to address the factors that lead to two major types of unethical authorship, namely, honorary and ghost authorship. It also highlights negative consequences of authorship misuse and provides a critical analysis of different authorship guidelines, including a recent debate on the amendments of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship definition. Empirical studies revealed that honorary authorship was the most prevalent deviation from the responsible authorship standards. Three different modalities of honorary authorship were distinguished: gift authorship, guest authorship, and coercive authorship. Prevalence of authorship misuse worldwide and in Europe was alarmingly high, covering approximately one third of all scientific publications. No significant differences were reported in authorship misuse between different health research disciplines. The studies conducted in North America highlighted the most effective means to cope with unethical authorship. These were training in publishing ethics, clear authorship policies developed by medical schools, and explicit compliance with the authorship criteria required by the medical journals. In conclusion, more empirical research is needed to raise awareness of the high prevalence of authorship misuse among scientists. Research integrity training courses, including publication ethics and authorship issues should be integrated into the curricula for students and young researchers in medical schools. Last but not least, further discussion on responsible authorship criteria and practice should be initiated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Gerz, Jochen. "Toward public authorship." Third Text 18, no. 6 (November 2004): 649–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0952882042000285050.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

McAdams, Dan P. "Life Authorship." Emerging Adulthood 1, no. 2 (March 26, 2013): 151–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2167696813481774.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Braun, Marta. "Muybridge, authorship, originality." Early Popular Visual Culture 11, no. 1 (February 2013): 41–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2012.756644.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Snake-Beings, Emit. "The Construction of Karen Karnak: The Multi-Author Function." Media International Australia 147, no. 1 (May 2013): 40–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x1314700106.

Full text
Abstract:
The context of this article is the changes in authorship that have occurred within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia. The mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture, compared with that of a Read/Only tradition, is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such represents new functions and attributes. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Karen Karnak and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, while concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names forms an important tool of deconstruction involving an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology in the creation of a collective multi-author pseudonym, Karen Karnak. The article ends with a discussion of the implications of multi-authorship on the concept of the body of work, ownership and copyright.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Leder, Stefan. "Authorship and transmission in unauthored literature." Oriens 31, no. 1 (July 4, 1988): 67–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18778372-03101005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Priest, Dale G., and Michael Keevak. "Sexual Shakespeare: Forgery, Authorship, Portraiture." Sixteenth Century Journal 33, no. 3 (2002): 924. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4144104.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Busse, Claire M., and Joseph Loewenstein. "Ben Jonson and Possessive Authorship." Sixteenth Century Journal 34, no. 4 (December 1, 2003): 1152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20061675.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Kretschmer, Hildrun, and Theo Kretschmer. "Studies in Co-authorship Pairs Distribution: Part-1." Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 2, no. 1 (June 2008): 45–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2008.10700840.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Kundra, Ramesh, Donald B. de Beaver, Hildrun Kretschmer, and Theo Kretschmer. "Studies in Co-authorship Pairs Distribution: Part-2." Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 2, no. 1 (June 2008): 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2008.10700841.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Bulik-Sullivan, Brendan K., and Patrick F. Sullivan. "The authorship network of genome-wide association studies." Nature Genetics 44, no. 2 (January 27, 2012): 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.1052.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Wright, Johnson Kent. "Rousseau, Authorship, and Revolution." Eighteenth-Century Studies 37, no. 4 (2004): 677–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2004.0049.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Stead, Lisa. "Adaptation, Authorship, and Contemporary Women Filmmakers." Australian Feminist Studies 30, no. 85 (July 3, 2015): 314–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1107947.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Lapeña, José Florencio F. "Authorship Controversies: Gift, Guest and Ghost Authorship." Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 34, no. 1 (June 18, 2019): 4–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v34i1.957.

Full text
Abstract:
Authorship, “the state or fact of being the writer of a book, article, or document, or the creator of a work of art,”1 derives from the word author, auctor, autour, autor “father, creator, one who brings about, one who makes or creates,” from Old French auctor, acteor “author, originator, creator, instigator,” directly from the Latin auctor “promoter, doer; responsible person, teacher,” literally “one who causes to grow.”2 It implies a creative privilege and responsibility that cannot be taken lightly. In the biomedical arena, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) “recommends that authorship be based on the following four criteria: 1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND 2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND 3. Final approval of the version to be published; AND 4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy and integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.”3 Thus, all persons designated as authors should qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify as authors should be so listed.3 The first of these general principles means that all persons listed as authors should meet the four ICMJE criteria for authorship; the second principle means that all those who meet the four ICMJE criteria for authorship should be listed as authors.3 The first part of the statement disqualifies honorific “gift” authors, complementary “guest” authors, and anonymous “ghost” authors from being listed as authors. The second part ensures the listing of all those who qualify as authors, even if they are no longer part of the institution or group from which the work emanates (such as students who have graduated or residents and fellows who have completed their postgraduate training). Honorific or “gift” authorship takes place when a subordinate (or junior) person lists a superior (or senior) person as an author, even if that person did not meet the four ICMJE authorship criteria.4,5 Bestowing the gift on a Chief, Chair, Department Head, Director, Dean, or such other person is often done in gratitude, but carries an unspoken expectation that the favor will be returned in the future. It can also be bestowed under coercive conditions (that may overlap with those of guest authorship discussed next).4.5 It is unethical because the gifted person does not qualify for authorship when at most only acknowledgement is his or her due. In the extreme, such a person can be put in the uncomfortable and embarrassing situation of being unable to comment on the supposedly co-authored work when asked to do so. Moreover, the unqualified co-author(s) may actually attempt to wash their hands of any allegations of misconduct, claiming for example that the resident first author “plagiarized the material” or “fabricated or manipulated the data” but “I/we certainly had nothing to do with that” - - hence the fourth criterion for authorship came to be.3 Reviewers and Editors may suspect “gift” authorship when for instance, a resident listed as first author writes the paper in the first person, using the pronoun “I” instead of “we” and thanks the consultant co-author under the “acknowledgements” section. The suspicions are further reinforced when the concerned co-author(s) do not participate in, or contribute to revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content during the review and editing process. Guest authorship takes place when influential or well-known individuals “lend” their name to a manuscript to boost its prestige, even though they had nothing to do with its creation.6,7 They may have been invited to do so by one or more of the actual authors, but they willingly agree, considering the arrangement mutually-beneficial. Thus, a student or resident may knowingly invite an adviser or consultant to be listed as co-author, even if the latter did not meet authorship criteria. The former perceives that having a known co-author increases the chances of a favorable review and publication; the latter effectively adds another publication to his or her curriculum vitae. It is not difficult to see how such symbioses may thrive in the “publish or perish” milieu of academe. Research advising alone, even if editing of the research paper was performed, do not qualify one for authorship (Cf. “gift” authorship). This is not to say that a research, thesis or dissertation adviser may not be listed as co-author – as long as he or she meets the 4 ICMJE criteria for authorship.3 A related misconduct is the practice by certain persons with seniority of insisting their names be listed first, even if more junior scholars did all the innovative thinking and research on a project. Indeed, the order of authorship can be a source of unhappiness and dispute. Authors be listed in the order of their contributions to the work – the one who contributed most is listed first, and the order of listing should be a joint decision of all co-authors at the start of the study (reviewed periodically). Ghost authorship usually pertains to paid professional writers who anonymously produce material that is officially attributed to another author.7,8 They may operate out of establishments that manufacture term papers, theses, and dissertations for the right price (such as the infamous C.M. Recto district in downtown Manila, now replaced by numerous online services). They may also be employed by the pharmaceutical industry to write promotional, favorable studies that will list well-known persons (professors, scientists, senior clinicians) as authors, often with consent and adequate compensation.8 Examples include “a professor at the University of Wisconsin” being paid “$1,500 in return for putting his name” on “an article on the ‘therapeutic effects’ of their diet pill Redux (dexfenfluramine),” that was “pulled from the market” a year later “as doctors began reporting heart-valve injuries in as many as one-third of patients taking the drug” and the drug “later linked to dozens of deaths.”9 Similar cases involved the “deadly drug” rofecoxib (Vioxx) “eventually blamed for some 60,000+ deaths,” that “was also linked to a number of shameful scandals relating to fraudulent studies and the use of ghostwriters to boost sales.”9 The costs involved are not meager; Parke-Davis paid “a medical education communication company (MECC) to write articles in support of the drug” Neurontin (gabapentin) “to the tune of $13,000 to $18,000 per article. In turn, MECC paid $1,000 each to friendly physicians and pharmacists to sign off as authors of the articles.”9 Pfizer (who acquired Neurontin form Parke-Davis) “was found guilty of illegally promoting off-label uses of Neurontin,” and “fined more than $142 million in damages.”9 Whether or not morbidities or mortalities ensue from the practice, both ghosts and beneficiary-authors should be held liable in such situations. Clearly, the practice of “gift,” “guest,” and “ghost” authorship should not be entertained by authors or tolerated by editors and reviewers. Authorship should be based on the ICMJE authorship criteria. Our editors and reviewers vigilantly strive to uphold and protect the rights and welfare of our authors and the integrity and soundness of their research. We call on all fellows, diplomates and residents in training to do the same.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Huvila, Isto. "Authoring social reality with documents." Journal of Documentation 75, no. 1 (January 14, 2019): 44–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-04-2018-0063.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeIn the context of organisation studies, Shotter and colleagues have used the notion of practical authorship of social situations and identities to explain the work of managers and leaders. This notion and contemporary theories of authorship in literary scholarship can be linked to the authoring of documents in the context of document studies to explain the impact and use of documents as instruments of management and communication. The paper aims to discuss these issues.Design/methodology/approachThe conceptual discussion is supported by an empirical interview study of the information work ofN=16 archaeologists.FindingsFirst, the making of documents and other artefacts, their use as instruments (e.g. boundary objects (BOs)) of management, and the practical authorship of social situations, collective and individual identities form a continuum of authorship. Second, that because practical authorship seems to bear a closer affinity to the liabilities/responsibilities and privileges of attached to documents rather than to a mere attribution of their makership or ownership, practical authorship literature might benefit of an increased focus on them.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper shows how practical authorship can be used as a framework to link making and use of documents to how they change social reality. Further, it shows how the notion of practical authorship can benefit of being complemented with insights from the literature on documentary and literary authorship, specifically that authorship is not only a question of making but also, even more so, of social attribution of responsibilities and privileges.Originality/valueThis paper shows how the concepts of documentary and practical authorship can be used to complement each other in elaborating our understanding of the making of artefacts (documentary) BOs and the social landscape.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Evelev, John, and Grantland S. Rice. "The Transformation of Authorship in America." William and Mary Quarterly 55, no. 4 (October 1998): 641. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2674459.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Parkinson, Michelle, and Brian Boyd. "Words That Count: Early Modern Authorship." Sixteenth Century Journal 37, no. 2 (July 1, 2006): 617. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20477963.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Harp, Richard, and Stephen B. Dobranski. "Milton, Authorship, and the Book Trade." Sixteenth Century Journal 32, no. 3 (2001): 811. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2671534.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Thomas, Matthew J. "Origen on Paul's Authorship of Hebrews." New Testament Studies 65, no. 4 (September 6, 2019): 598–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0028688519000274.

Full text
Abstract:
It is a common notion among modern biblical scholars that Origen doubted Paul's authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews. This article offers an examination of Origen's writings on this question, and shows that the evidence is wildly misrepresented in contemporary discussions. It does this by beginning with Origen's Letter to Africanus, continuing with an overview of his Hebrews citations across his writing career, and concluding with an analysis of his oft-cited comments in Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History. This examination shows that while Origen suspects Hebrews’ composition to involve more than Paul alone, his surprisingly consistent testimony is that the epistle is indeed Paul's.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

KNAPP, JEFFREY. "What Is a Co-Author?" Representations 89, no. 1 (2005): 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rep.2005.89.1.1.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT In this essay, Jeffrey Knapp questions the recent critical orthodoxy that treats authorship as a menacing latecomer to the popular and collaborative Elizabethan stage. Demonstrating that a literary paradigm of single authorship dominated Elizabethan thinking about playwriting, Knapp presents Hamlet as Shakespeare's attempt to develop a more theatrically inflected model of authorship through the dramatization of his own hybrid professional identity as an actor and a playwright.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Kumar, Sameer. "Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature." Aslib Journal of Information Management 67, no. 1 (January 19, 2015): 55–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ajim-09-2014-0116.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to attempt to provide a review of the growing literature on co-authorship networks and the research gaps that may be investigated for future studies in this field. Design/methodology/approach – The existing literature on co-authorship networks was identified, evaluated and interpreted. Narrative review style was followed. Findings – Co-authorship, a proxy of research collaboration, is a key mechanism that links different sets of talent to produce a research output. Co-authorship could also be seen from the perspective of social networks. An in-depth analysis of such knowledge networks provides an opportunity to investigate its structure. Patterns of these relationships could reveal, for example, the mechanism that shapes our scientific community. The study provides a review of the expanding literature on co-authorship networks. Originality/value – This is one of the first comprehensive reviews of network-based studies on co-authorship. The field is fast evolving, opening new gaps for potential research. The study identifies some of these gaps.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Drozdov, V. A. "The authorship of the poem ‘Ushshaq-nama from the prospect of academic orientalist studies and modern computer technologies." Orientalistica 3, no. 5 (December 29, 2020): 1360–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2020-3-5-1360-1378.

Full text
Abstract:
The poem ‘Ushshaq-nama by Fakhr ad-Din ‘Iraqi (610–688 / 1213–1289) is the first poetical writing on the subject of mystical love in Persian literature. ‘Iraqi’s authorship of this work has never been questioned by researchers. However, the English orientalist J. Baldick 1973 cast a doubt on ‘Iraqi’s authorship of this poem. The article examines in detail the arguments of J. Baldick both from the point of view of the context of the creation of the poem, as well as the methods of the latest computational methods, in particular stylometry. Boldik's arguments concern both the historical and religious context in which ‘Iraqi lived and the peculiarities of his works, primarily the poem‘Ushshaq-name. The paper demonstrates that this computational method may be used for the study of the features of the style of Persian poetry and the confirmation of the authorship of doubtful Persian writings. Further expert decision full-field by Artjoms Šeļa based on stylometric methods for the establishment of the poem ‘Ushshaq- nama is expounded. While the results of the analysis of the historical and religious contexts of the poem may serve as confirmation of the authorship of ‘Iraqi and the refutation of the Baldick hypothesis, the results of the stylometric analysis do not give an unambiguous answer to the question of its authorship.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Vayntrub, Jacqueline. "Before Authorship: Solomon and Prov. 1:1." Biblical Interpretation 26, no. 2 (May 7, 2018): 182–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685152-00262p03.

Full text
Abstract:
How should we understand the naming of legendary figures like Solomon in biblical titles? The ancient practice of attribution is often obscured by scholars committed to the modern construction of authorship. Texts such as 11QPsa XXVII (“David’s Compositions”) demonstrate an altogether different understanding of this ancient practice. Using Prov. 1:1 as a test case, this essay examines how biblical authors and editors assigned texts to legendary figures, and how this kind of attribution evokes a set of imagined associations in the broader literary tradition. The essay presents a description and categorization of biblical titles and textual frames, and compares these titles and frames to textual frames of ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean collections of instruction and poetry. The essay argues that Prov. 1:1, like other textual frames, uses attribution to imaginatively stage the text in the broader literary tradition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Rovira-Esteva, Sara, Javier Franco Aixelá, and Christian Olalla-Soler. "A bibliometric study of co-authorship in Translation Studies." Onomázein Revista de lingüística filología y traducción, no. 47 (April 2020): 158–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.47.09.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Authorship studies' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography