Relevant bibliographies by topics / Associate justices of the supreme court

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Associate justices of the supreme court'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 29 July 2024
Last updated: 31 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Associate justices of the supreme court.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Associate justices of the supreme court"

1

O'Brien, David M. "The Supreme Court: From Warren to Burger to Rehnquist." PS 20, no. 1 (1987): 12–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0030826900627479.

Full text
Abstract:
Changes in the composition of the Supreme Court perhaps inevitably invite speculation about whether and how the Court will change, and what direction it will take in the future. The move of William Rehnquist from associate justice to chief justice and the addition of Antonin Scalia certainly alters the chemistry of the Court. These changes may also have a profound impact on the Court's place in American government during the rest of this century.There is no doubt that the Court will change. Differences are already apparent during oral arguments. Rehnquist is sharper, more thoughtful, more commanding and wittier than his predecessor in the center chair. And from the far right of the bench, Scalia almost bubbles over with energy and questions for counsel. No less revealing is that in the week before the start of the 1986–87 term on the first Monday in October, Rehnquist managed to get the justices to dispose of over 1,000 cases (granting 22 and denying or otherwise disposing of the rest). He did so in only two days, whereas it usually took Burger more than twice as long to get through about the same number.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

O'Brien, David M. "The Supreme Court: From Warren to Burger to Rehnquist." PS: Political Science & Politics 20, no. 01 (1987): 12–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500025610.

Full text
Abstract:
Changes in the composition of the Supreme Court perhaps inevitably invite speculation about whether and how the Court will change, and what direction it will take in the future. The move of William Rehnquist from associate justice to chief justice and the addition of Antonin Scalia certainly alters the chemistry of the Court. These changes may also have a profound impact on the Court's place in American government during the rest of this century.There is no doubt that the Court will change. Differences are already apparent during oral arguments. Rehnquist is sharper, more thoughtful, more commanding and wittier than his predecessor in the center chair. And from the far right of the bench, Scalia almost bubbles over with energy and questions for counsel. No less revealing is that in the week before the start of the 1986–87 term on the first Monday in October, Rehnquist managed to get the justices to dispose of over 1,000 cases (granting 22 and denying or otherwise disposing of the rest). He did so in only two days, whereas it usually took Burger more than twice as long to get through about the same number.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Reynolds, Robert J., Scott J. Kush, Steven M. Day, and Pierre Vachon. "Comparative Mortality and Risk Factors for Death among US Supreme Court Justices (1789-2013)." Journal of Insurance Medicine 45, no. 1 (January 1, 2015): 9–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17849/0743-6661-45.1.9.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives To compare the mortality experience of 112 justices of the US Supreme Court with that expected in the general population. To identify variables associated with mortality within this cohort. Background Supreme Court justices are a select occupational cohort. High socio-economic status, advanced education, lifetime appointment, and the healthy worker effect suggest lower mortality. Sedentary work, stress, and a tendency to work beyond typical retirement age may attenuate this. Methods Standardized mortality ratios compare the observed mortality rates of justices with those expected in age- and sex-matched contemporary general populations. Poisson regression analyzes variables associated with mortality within the cohort. Results From 1789 to 2013, 112 justices (108 male) contributed 2,355 person-years of exposure. Mean age (standard deviation) at appointment was 53.1 years (6.7); at retirement 69.7 years (9.9); at death (n = 100) 74.4 years (10.3); and at end of the study for those alive (n = 12) 72.1 years (11.8). Standardized mortality ratios (95% ci) were: overall 0.87 (0.70-1.05); prior to 1950 0.92 (0.61-1.33); and from 1950 to 2013 0.66 (0.42-0.99). Variables in the final Poisson model and their associated mortality rate ratios (95% ci) were: age 1.06 (1.03-1.09); calendar year 0.99 (0.99-1.00); active status 0.41 (0.25-0.68); career length 1.04 (1.01-1.07); and chief justice 1.08 (0.59-1.84). Conclusions Supreme Court mortality was lower than that of the general population in the period from 1950 to the present, but was on par prior to 1950. Increasing age and career length were associated with greater mortality, while active status and later calendar year with lower. These results may add to a body of knowledge that may help to develop or refine models of mortality risk in increasingly aged working populations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

King, Sandra Leigh. "Failure to Launch: How the Delinquent Politics and Policies of the Texas Legislature Have Failed to Remedy Texas’s Antiquated Judicial System and How Voters Have Accepted the Status Quo for Far Too Long." Texas Wesleyan Law Review 16, no. 3 (March 2010): 369–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/twlr.v16.i3.2.

Full text
Abstract:
Several scholars, most notably judges, have called for judicial reform in the selection process of appellate and supreme court justices in Texas. However, not much attention has been placed on the selection process of Texas trial court judges. This Article focuses on the genealogy of district courts in Texas, with an emphasis on Texas's family court system, an area of the law that decides the fate of thousands of children who, for the most part, are unable to speak for themselves and that comprises a majority of civil cases within the state of Texas. As the majority of family court cases are decided by the trial court, judicial review by an appellate or higher court is virtually non-existent. It is therefore necessary to have associate and district court family judges who are educated and adequately staffed to handle the multifarious complex issues involving children and families. It is also vital that citizens better educate themselves about our judicial candidates and the judiciary in general until such time as the Texas legislature gets serious and enacts fundamental change pertaining to the selection of state judges at all levels.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Scheppele, Kim Lane. "Manners of Imagining the real." Law & Social Inquiry 19, no. 04 (1994): 995–1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1994.tb00946.x.

Full text
Abstract:
What counts as evidence? What is accepted as true in court given the evidence admitted? How are subordinated peoples further oppressed in courts because they cannot demonstrate that their experience is fact? Drawing on the confirmation brings for Clarence Thomas as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court and the testimony of Anita Hill in those hearings, the author explores the ways in which representations of sexual violence against women can be seen as not “real.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sonia, Sotomayor. "A Conversation with Supreme Court Associate Justice: To Educators: “The work that you do is what prepares children for their futures.”." Council Chronicle 30, no. 3 (March 1, 2021): 6–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.58680/cc202131107.

Full text
Abstract:
NCTE Executive Director Emily Kirkpatrick shared a mid-February Zoom call with Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor to talk about her books, her approach to writing, her hopes for students and teachers, and what it was like to swear in the first female Vice President of color of this country.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Sargent, Sarah, and James Slater. "Introduction." Denning Law Journal 32, no. 1 (March 31, 2021): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/dlj.v32i1.1921.

Full text
Abstract:
The Denning Law Journal Team is very pleased to bring you the 2020 edition. In a year of unprecedent challenges and changes, we would especially like to extend our thanks to our contributors who have provided an outstanding collection of articles, comments and book reviews. We also note the passing of a distinguished jurist, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was an Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court. She was the second woman to serve on the United States Supreme Court and is noted as a proponent of civil liberties. This edition of the Denning Law Journal is dedicated to Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the legacy of her work in safeguarding and promoting civil liberties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hudson, Alexander, and Ivar Alberto Hartmann. "Can you bury ideology? An empirical analysis of the ideal points of the Ministers of Brazil’s Supremo Tribunal Federal." A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional 17, no. 68 (June 25, 2017): 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.21056/aec.v17i68.802.

Full text
Abstract:
Brazil's Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) is an especially interesting case for scholars with an interest in judicial behavior. The justices of the STF rule in tens of thousands of cases per year, in a great variety of legal disputes. The ideological breakdown of the STF remains puzzling. Observers of the STF find that a single left-right dimension is entirely inadequate to describe the voting coalitions that form in the court. In this paper, we utilize a new dataset covering a representative sample of all cases decided by the STF between 1992 and 2013. The first important finding is that the voting patterns of the STF show that at least four dimensions are necessary to describe the justices' ideal points. We then estimate ideal points for 23 justices on each of four dimensions, and associate these dimensions with the dominant areas of law with which the STF deals. Finally, we seek to use these ideal point estimates to compare the votes of the justices in key cases with their broader voting pattern.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Eboe-Osuji, Chile. "A Tribute To Robert H. Jackson – Recalling America's Contributions To International Criminal Justice." Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 113 (2019): 355–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/amp.2019.162.

Full text
Abstract:
It is an immense honor to be here. But the honor is special indeed; because it was around this time seventy-four years ago—more precisely on April 13, 1945—that Robert H. Jackson (as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) addressed this same gathering, in a classic speech titled “Rule of Law Among Nations.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Whittington, Keith E. "Reconstructing the Federal Judiciary: The Chase Impeachment and the Constitution." Studies in American Political Development 9, no. 1 (1995): 55–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0898588x00001176.

Full text
Abstract:
Only the United States supreme court justice has ever been impeached. In January 1804, the House of Representatives began a formal inquiry into the official conduct of Associate Justice Samuel Chase and approved eight articles of impeachment in November of that same year. The Senate held a trial of the justice in February 1805, which concluded with his acquittal on March 1. On the final article of impeachment, Chase escaped removal by four votes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Associate justices of the supreme court"

1

Trudden, Sallie Raye. "The Power Behind the Constitution: The Supreme Court." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2009. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1864.

Full text
Abstract:
The framers of the Constitution designed a document to be the "Supreme Law of the Land" and within its pages a branch of government, a federal judiciary, never before envisioned. The Constitution, along with the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789, set the framework for building the strongest branch of government, the Supreme Court. Historical events and court decisions with few exceptions strengthened the power of the judiciary contributing to its authority. The Supreme Court Justices, by interpreting the Constitution and judging the legality of laws instituted by both state and federal legislatures, solidified its superior position in the government hierarchy. An examination of documents, case decisions, and the results of these decisions for the nation add credence to the assertion that of the three branches of government the strongest and most powerful was and is the Supreme Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Valenzuela, Celene. "The 'Lean In' Theory, Validated by Three Supreme Court Justices." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 2018. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/757.

Full text
Abstract:
The definition of leadership is not gender specific; however, the role of a leader continues to be defined in mostly male terms by society. While, women have outpaced men in gaining an undergraduate education, women are not being hired for top leadership roles. There continues to be a gender leadership gap in both the private and public sector. Women continue to advance in their education and career, yet they are unable to break the invisible glass ceiling and attain top leadership roles. This study proposes that in order to gain equality and reduce the gender leadership gap, in both the public and private sector, it is up to individual women to seek and attain leadership positions, thereby opening the path for others. The study identified both the internal and external barriers that prevent women from moving ahead in their careers. It also provided solutions that women can adopt to gain top leadership roles, based on Sheryl Sandberg’s ‘Lean In’ theory, which notes that women can make adjustments and strategies in order to obtain top leadership positions. Women can overcome barriers and move ahead with their careers by increasing self-confidence, balancing roles at home, and setting realistic standards. Women need to also step out of their comfort zone and believe in themselves. Through a qualitative content analysis, the study analyzed how three women achieved top leadership roles and were successful in applying the concepts of Sheryl Sandberg’s ‘Lean In’ theory. The study included Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States Sandra Day O'Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor. The study identified the barriers that they individually faced as they sought their career. The women were selected to be part of the study due to their incredible accomplishments of achieving positions in the highest level of judicial public service, in a male-dominated field. The sampling and collection in this study included the digital autobiographies and biographies of the public service leaders, by creditable sources. The analysis sought to answer the three study questions: What forms of barriers did the Associate Justices face as they advanced in their careers? What strategies and approaches did the Associate Justices take when faced with barriers? How does Sheryl Sandberg’s ‘Lean In’ theory apply to the Associate Justices? The written autobiographies and biographies of the Associate Justices were analyzed using NVivo, a software that analyzes digital texts. Two coding categories were selected as part of the analysis. One focused on the barriers that the Associate Justices encountered as they moved ahead with their career and the second category focused on the strategies and approaches they used to overcome them. The study findings demonstrated that the Associate Justices faced a significant number of barriers as they sought to advance in their legal careers. They encountered discrimination, gender bias and the obstacles of balancing their careers and family. The analysis results also strongly conveyed that the Associate Justices used a number of strategies and approaches to overcome the barriers. They were self-confident and set realistic standards – therefore validating Sheryl Sandberg’s ‘Lean In’ theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Glennon, Colin, and Logan Strother. "The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1086/703065.

Full text
Abstract:
Judicial politics scholars routinely posit that the behavior of Supreme Court justices is motivated in important part by concerns of institutional maintenance, that is, by a desire to maintain the Court’s unusually large store of institutional legitimacy. Previous work on this topic, however, has focused almost exclusively on the influence of such motivation on judicial decision making. We contend that if institutional maintenance is an important goal, it should be observable in other contexts as well. We examine televised mass-media interviews with Supreme Court justices from 1998 to 2016 and find that legitimacy reinforcement is the predominant goal reflected in justices’ rhetoric in those interviews.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Poston, Brook Carl Potts Louis W. "George's court the role of the Supreme Court justices as statesmen in the 1790's /." Diss., UMK access, 2007.

Find full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.A.)--Dept. of History. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2007.
"A thesis in history." Typescript. Advisor: Louis Potts. Vita. Title from "catalog record" of the print edition Description based on contents viewed Jan. 24, 2008. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 98-103). Online version of the print edition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ingles, Mark Thomas. "Questioning Justices: An Examination of Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings From 1955-2005." Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK, 2010. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1288628751.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

SERRANO, PAULO MARCELO DE MIRANDA. "PATHS TO THE COURT: STATE AND SOCIETY IN THE NOMINATION OF JUSTICES TO THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2015. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=26899@1.

Full text
Abstract:
PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO
O tema da pesquisa é o Supremo Tribunal Federal, enfrentando a seguinte questão: o modelo de escolha dos ministros do STF deve ser alterado ou mantido? A investigação tem por objetivo chaves para essa indagação. A relevância do tema é justificada pela importância, no cenário nacional, do Supremo Tribunal Federal, que, além de se encontrar no vértice do Poder Judiciário, encontra-se presente, de forma crescente, na vida contemporânea da sociedade brasileira. São objetivos intermediários da pesquisa: verificar por que o Senado brasileiro, nos séculos 20 e 21, até o momento, jamais deixou de aprovar a escolha dos presidentes da República; quem são os ministros do período mais recente, adotando-se como delimitação temporal os trintas anos do período de redemocratização iniciados em 1985; e, finalmente, por que o Brasil mudou tanto desde 1891 e a forma de escolha dos ministros do STF nunca foi alterada, bem como de que maneira o aparente paradoxo existente entre um sistema institucional dinâmico e um modelo de escolha conservador pode nos revelar o caráter do sistema institucional brasileiro. Ao final, respondendo ao objetivo geral, avalia-se quais são as alterações com maior viabilidade de serem introduzidas, tanto por cambio formal do modelo, quanto pelo modo de sua efetivação e acompanhamento pela sociedade. A seguir, é feita contribuição própria, apontando caminhos para ensejar e motivar a participação da sociedade civil no processo. Encerrando o trabalho, após desvendar os caminhos que levam homens e mulheres para a Corte Suprema brasileira, que, por sua vez, determinam os caminhos que a própria Corte percorrerá, é feito, em considerações finais, um esforço interpretativo que sugere o que pode a escolha dos ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal, enquanto fenômeno sócio-político, revelar sobre o Brasil contemporâneo.
The research theme is the Brazilian Supreme Court, facing the following question: should the model of choosing the justices be altered or maintained? The goal of the investigation is finding keys to this question. The relevance of the theme is justified by the importance, in the national scene, of the Brazilian Supreme Court, which not only is at the top of the Judiciary Power, but finds itself increasingly present in contemporary brazilian society life. Intermediate goals of the research are: investigate why the brazilian Senate, from the 20th and 21st century until present day, has never disapproved the choice of presidents of the Republic; who are the most recent ministers, setting as temporal delimitation the thirty years of redemocratization starting in 1985; and finally, why did Brazil change so much since 1891 and the model of choosing justices was never altered, as well as how the apparently existing paradox between an institutional dynamic system and a conservative model of choice can reveal the character of the Brazilian institutional system. In closing, while answering the main goals, an review on the alterations with most viability of being introduced in provided, both by formal model switching as well as by method of execution and followup by society. After that, a personal contribution is made, pointing paths to give rise and motivate participation of the civil society in this process. Finishing the research, after unveiling the paths that lead men and women to the Brazilian Supreme Court, paths that determine the course of the Court itself, an effort is made, as final considerations, suggesting what the choice of ministers of the Brazilian Supreme Court, as a social-political phenomena, reveal about contemporary Brazil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Strother, Logan, and Colin Glennon. "Can Supreme Court Justices Go Public? The Effect of Justice Rhetoric on Judicial Legitimacy." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2019. https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/7773.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Whitaker, Robert A. "Freedom of a speech| The speeches of the Warren Court Justices and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court." Thesis, State University of New York at Albany, 2017. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10246592.

Full text
Abstract:

While justices of the U.S. Supreme Court routinely claim they do not deliver speeches to audiences outside the Court, or that the content of their remarks is unimportant, scholars have long recognized that the justices speak frequently off the bench. Despite this recognition, studies of judicial speech view it largely as a potential transgression of legal norms, risking the images of neutrality and independence that are widely seen as the primary bases of the Court’s legitimacy; few studies have explored judicial speech in any detail, and surprisingly little is known about the actual content of the justices’ speeches. In this dissertation, I pose two primary questions: first, what do the justices say, and second, what does the content of judicial speech tell us about institutional legitimacy? Reviewing approximately 400 speeches by the justices of the Warren Court (1953–1969), I find the justices’ speeches generally appear as any one of four primary themes: advocating future policy and signaling outside actors to prepare for implementation, in advance of a major ruling by the Court; defending the Court’s rulings on the basis of projecting favorable images of democracy abroad; defending the Court’s rulings on the basis of constitutional claims and understandings and defending against broader attacks on judicial authority, such as court-curbing legislation; and last, articulating idealized visions of democracy and future politics. Further, I find evidence of these themes in the speeches of the justices of the Roberts Court in 2012. Contrary to the judicial “lockjaw” conception of speech as a threat to neutrality and legitimacy, I find judicial speech, while shaped by legal norms, frequently draws upon values and structures associated with democracy, enabling the justices to rework and construct political narratives about the Court and its rulings in speeches that attend to the Court’s institutional legitimacy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Wyant, Nicholas Nye. "Gideon, Escobedo and Miranda: How three Supreme Court Justices waged the ideological battle against communism." Thesis, Wichita State University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1555.

Full text
Abstract:
The United States Supreme Court was at the center of criticism in the 1960s. Unpopular Court decisions, such as expanding the rights of the criminally accused, brought the Court a lot of attention. The Court is the most removed body of government in the United States, being that members are appointed, not elected. Thus this separation from the Court created the need to explain its behavior, i.e. why it produced the opinions it did. This paper explores three Court decisions, Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) and argues that the decisions in each case were due to the individual Justices experience with communism, than with any other of the theories behind the Court’s action.
Thesis (M.A)-- Wichita State University, College of College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of History
"December 2007."
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Wyant, Nicholas Nye Johnson Judith. "Gideon, Escobedo and Miranda: How three Supreme Court Justices waged the ideological battle against communism /." Thesis, A link to full text of this thesis in SOAR, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1555.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Associate justices of the supreme court"

1

Paras, Corazon L. Profiles of the chief justices and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. Manila, Philippines: Supreme Court Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Paras, Corazon L. Profiles of the chief justices and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. Manila, Philippines: Supreme Court Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Paras, Corazon L. Profiles of the chief justices and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. Manila, Philippines: Supreme Court Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Paras, Corazon L. Profiles of the chief justices and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. Manila, Philippines: Supreme Court Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Padilla, Teodoro R. Speeches of Senior Associate Justice Teodoro R. Padilla. Manila: Supreme Court of the Philippines, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Quisumbing, Leonardo A. Light at the crossroads: Selected opinions of Senior Associate Justice Leonardo A. Quisumbing. Manila, Philippines: Supreme Court of the Philippines, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Nachura, Antonio B. Faithful stewardship of the law: Selected decisions and dissents of Associate Justice Antonio Eduardo B. Nachura. Manila, Philippines: Supreme Court of the Philippines, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Morales, Conchita Carpio. Moral imperative, my judicial pilgrimage: Selected Supreme Court decisions and resolutions of Associate Justice Conchita Carpio Morales. Manila, Philippines: Supreme Court of the Philippines, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Romero, Flerida Ruth P. Justice flowing like a stream: Gems culled from the decisions, separate concurring, and dissenting opinions of Senior Associate Justice Flerida Ruth P. Romero. Manila, Philippines: F.R.P. Romero, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Judiciary, United States Congress Senate Committee on the. Nomination of Antonin Scalia to be Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court: Report. [Washington, D.C.?: U.S. G.P.O., 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Associate justices of the supreme court"

1

Sommer, Udi. "Strategic Votes on Cert: Evidence from Justices’ Papers." In Supreme Court Agenda Setting, 61–81. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137398642_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Smith, Glen. "Should Supreme Court Justices Be Elected?" In Disagreeing Agreeably, 136–42. Names: Smith, Glen (Professor of political science), author.Title: Disagreeing agreeably : issue debates with a primer on political disagreement / Glen Smith.Description: New York : Routledge, [2019]: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429277054-14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

ben-Aaron, James, Paul M. Collins, and Lori A. Ringhand. "The Selection of U.S. Supreme Court Justices." In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior, 151–65. New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315691527-10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Unah, Isaac. "Appointment of Justices to the U.S. Supreme Court." In The Supreme Court in American Politics, 49–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230102354_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Yarbrough, Tinsley E. "The Justices." In The Rehnquist Court and the Constitution, 1–36. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195103465.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In a White House ceremony on the morning of September 26, 1986, Chief Justice Burger administered his successor the oath of office required by the Constitution. That afternoon at the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Rehnquist took the judicial oath, promising to “administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich:’ Earlier, William Bradford Reynolds, President Reagan’s assistant attorney general for civil rights, had denounced the”radical egalitarianism” of Rehnquist’s colleague and the Court’s senior associate justice, William J. Brennan, Jr., who, Reynolds charged, had “allowed his liberal orthodoxy to shape his jurisprudence.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Graglia, Lino A. "The Rehnquist Court and Economic Rights." In The Rehnquist Court, 116–40. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195148398.003.0007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Tushnet, Mark V. "“The Steam Roller Will Have to Grind Me Under”." In Making Constitutional Law, 28–55. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195093148.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The Supreme Court in 1967 was the “right place” and the “right time” for Mar shall in part because it was the heyday of the Warren Court. When Marshall took his seat on the Court at the start of the 1967 Term, he might have expected to. participate in a continuing series of liberal decisions. Chief Justice Earl Warren, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower in 1953, and Associate Justice William J. Brennan, appointed by Eisenhower three years later, had become the leaders of the Court’s liberal wing. They were regularly joined by Justices William O.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Neuborne, Burt. "Free Expression and the Rehnquist Court." In The Rehnquist Court, 15–33. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195148398.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Continuity” is not a word ordinarily associated with William Rehnquist. For much of his judicial career, the Chief Justice has been an apostle of legal discontinuity; a vigorous critic of Supreme Court doctrine, including much of our modern free speech heritage. From his appointment as an Associate Justice in 1972, Justice Rehnquist was a frequent dissenter in important First Amendment cases. In the years before he was named Chief Justice in 1986, Justice Rehnquist’s most influential free speech opinion for the Court was Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co., where he almost derailed the emerging commercial speech doctrine by persuading a narrowly divided Court that the “greater” power to ban an activity like gambling carries with it the “lesser” power to ban truthful commercial speech about its lawful availability. But “continuity” is the only accurate way to describe the free speech jurisprudence of the Rehnquist Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Yarbrough, Tinsley E. "Common Law Justice." In David Hackett Souter, 147–96. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159332.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The Supreme Court David Souter joined in October 1990 had long been the target of a battle for its jurisprudential soul-a struggle waged, with varying degrees of intensity on and off the Court, since Chief Justice Earl Warren’s 1969 retirement. In his 1968 presidential campaign, Richard Nixon had vowed to place “strict constructionists” on the Court-justices who would overturn or substantially restrict the expansive civil liberties precedents of the Warren era. Before the Watergate scandal forced him from office, Nixon appointed Minnesota native and conservative federal appeals court judge Warren Burger, a vigorous critic of Warren Court decisions expanding the rights of criminal defendants, to replace Warren and named as associate justices Burger’s boyhood friend Harry Blackmun, distinguished Richmond lawyer and former president of the American Bar Association Lewis Powell, and William H. Rehnquist, head of the Nixon Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. During his brief tenure as Nixon’s successor, Gerald Ford chose federal court of appeals judge John Paul Stevens to replace William 0. Douglas in 1975, and in 1981, Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor to join the Nixon-Ford appointees and Warren Court holdovers William Brennan, Byron White, and Thurgood Marshall on the high bench.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Scalia, Antonin. "Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States of America." In Federalism in a Changing World, 539–48. McGill-Queen's University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780773571402-040.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Associate justices of the supreme court"

1

Delemazure, Théo, Chris Dong, Dominik Peters, and Magdalena Tydrichova. "Comparing Ways of Obtaining Candidate Orderings from Approval Ballots." In Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-24}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/305.

Full text
Abstract:
To understand and summarize approval preferences and other binary evaluation data, it is useful to order the items on an axis which explains the data. In a political election using approval voting, this could be an ideological left-right axis such that each voter approves adjacent candidates, an analogue of single-peakedness. In a perfect axis, every approval set would be an interval, which is usually not possible, and so we need to choose an axis that gets closest to this ideal. The literature has developed algorithms for optimizing several objective functions (e.g., minimize the number of added approvals needed to get a perfect axis), but provides little help with choosing among different objectives. In this paper, we take a social choice approach and compare 5 different axis selection rules axiomatically, by studying the properties they satisfy. We establish some impossibility theorems, and characterize (within the class of scoring rules) the rule that chooses the axes that maximize the number of votes that form intervals, using the axioms of ballot monotonicity and resistance to cloning. Finally, we study the behavior of the rules on data from French election surveys, on the votes of justices of the US Supreme Court, and on synthetic data.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Associate justices of the supreme court"

1

Band, Jonathan. Justice Breyer, Copyright, and Libraries. Association of Research Libraries, May 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/breyercopyright2022.

Full text
Abstract:
On the occasion of Associate Justice Stephen Breyer retiring at the end of this US Supreme Court term, Jonathan Band, who represents and advises the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) on copyright issues, wrote a reflection on Breyer’s impact on the application of copyright law to libraries. In this brief paper, Band reviews Breyer’s majority opinion in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley (2013), which clarified that the first-sale doctrine applied to copies manufactured abroad, and the dissenting opinion Breyer wrote in Golan v. Holder (2012), in which the associate justice drew heavily on amicus briefs filed by the library community and provided language on the important role of libraries in preserving cultural heritage that can be cited in future cases. These two opinions, Band concludes, “reflect a deep understanding of the impact of copyright on libraries, an appreciation for the historic mission of libraries in promoting cultural heritage and making information accessible to the public, and an effort to apply the copyright law in a manner that does not interfere with this mission.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gostin, Lawrence. The Future of the Affordable Care Act is a Social and Political Decision That Should Not be Decided by Unelected Supreme Court Justices. Milbank Memorial Fund, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1599/mqop.2021.0428.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Associate justices of the supreme court' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography