Academic literature on the topic 'Argumentative'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Argumentative.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Argumentative"
Graeff, Telisa Furlanetto, and Lauro Gomes. "A relação semântica entre linguagem verbal e não verbal em tiras, com base na semântica argumentativa (The semantic relation between verbal and nonverbal language in comic strips based on the argumentative semantics)." Estudos da Língua(gem) 13, no. 1 (June 30, 2015): 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.22481/el.v13i1.1278.
Full textInácio, Daniele Alves. "A polifonia e os princípios argumentativos subjacentes ao discurso indígena Guarani." Cadernos do IL 1, no. 36 (March 6, 2008): 24–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/2236-6385.18909.
Full textHassan, Raad Ahmed, and Lubna Hussein Salman. "The Argumentative Elements Of Discours In The Plague For Albert Camus Les éléments argumentatifs dans le discours de La Peste d’Albert Camus." Journal of the College of languages, no. 45 (January 2, 2022): 150–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2022.0.45.0150.
Full textFonseca Guerra, Odalis, Belkis Rosa Cabrera Vázquez, and Luisa María Vázquez Pérez. "El texto argumentativo, su construcción y potencialidades para el desarrollo de la comunicación." Revista Cognosis 7, no. 2 (June 27, 2022): 01–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.33936/cognosis.v7i2.4817.
Full textBrossais, Emmanuelle, Nathalie Panissal, and Claudine Garcia-Debanc. "Analyses plurielles d’un débat entre élèves. Émergence d’une méthode d’analyse thématico-argumentative." Cahiers de recherche sociologique, no. 54 (July 24, 2014): 113–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1025995ar.
Full textXavier, Gisele Pereira De Oliveira, and Marcelo Almeida Bairral. "FÓRUM DE DISCUSSÃO ONLINE: experiências e formação continuada em matemática." Cadernos de Pesquisa 24, no. 1 (May 24, 2017): 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.18764/2178-2229.v24n1p101-113.
Full textLewinski, Marcin. "Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues." Informal Logic 41, no. 3 (September 9, 2021): 421–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6855.
Full textLópez Trujillo, Martha Inés, Fuensanta Hernández Pina, and María Teresa Caro Valverde. "Análisis microetnográfico sobre el desarrollo lectoescritor del comentario argumentativo de textos en estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad El Bosque." Educatio Siglo XXI 39, no. 1 (February 25, 2021): 61–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/educatio.460441.
Full textNasihah, Durotun, and Sonny Elfiyanto. "ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING CONSTRUCTION OF EFL WRITING CLASS THROUGH DECLARATIVE SPEECH ACTS APPROACH." IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) 9, no. 2 (December 29, 2022): 192–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v9i2.28522.
Full textBarbaud, Philippe. "L’opérateur de restriction ne… que et l’argumentation." Revue québécoise de linguistique 15, no. 1 (May 27, 2009): 153–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/602552ar.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Argumentative"
Declercq, Gilles. "Rhétorique et argumentation : essai d'analyse argumentative du texte littéraire." Paris 4, 1992. http://www.theses.fr/1992PA040206.
Full textFirst school of argumentation in antiquity,rhetoric is a practical reflection in the art of persuasion by speaking,a techne providing the orator,step by step,with tools for building a persuasive speech. .
BARRETO, Enilda Cabral. "Estudo da competência argumentativa de alunos do Ensino Fundamental." Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, 2008. http://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/riufcg/1665.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2018-09-10T15:11:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ENILDA CABRAL BARRETO - DISSERTAÇÃO POSLE 2008..pdf: 1250121 bytes, checksum: ef63b1466f69a9b0270106d4c2149839 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-03
Este trabalho objetivou analisar a manifestação da argumentação nas produções orais e escritas dos alunos, por intermédio de uma ação metodológica, através da interpretação do impacto do conjunto de atividades organizadas e aplicadas pela professora na sala de aula (DOLZ, NOVERRAZ & SCHNEUWLY, 2004). Assim, de modo específico, pretendeu-se investigar o uso dos operadores argumentativos na produção de argumentos em artigos de opinião escritos por alunos do 9º ano e analisar o impacto da ação metodológica da professora no exercício da competência argumentativa nas produções orais (interação) e escritas dos alunos. As questões postas foram: Como se manifesta a competência argumentativa dos alunos nas suas produções escritas? E que estratégias metodológicas desenvolvidas na seqüência didática contribuíram para o desenvolvimento da competência argumentativa manifestada? Os resultados da pesquisa mostram que os alunos têm consciência da necessidade de apresentar argumentos para a defesa de um ponto de vista nas modalidades oral e escrita. Todavia, tal consciência, por si só, não responde pelas produções ditas “bem feitas,” que a escola exige desses alunos. O ensino sistematizado, organizado em torno de uma seqüência didática, sobre o estudo da argumentação, voltado para as necessidades específicas dos alunos, foi capaz de evidenciar melhorias significativas nas produções argumentativas deles. Assim, constatamos que o desenvolvimento da competência argumentativa dos alunos demonstrado na sala de aula, durante a interação, bem como nas produções escritas, recebeu influência direta das ações metodológicas da professora visto que o tratamento dado a tal objeto de estudo promoveu contribuições teóricas acerca do objeto contemplado, uma vez que se amadureceu em torno da aprendizagem dos alunos.
This work objectived to analyze the demonstration of argumentation in the oral and written students’ productions, through methodological action, through interpretation of the impact of the collection of the organized and applied activities by teacher in the classroom (DOLZ, NOVERRAZ & SCHNEUWLY, 2004). So, in a specific way, we intended to investigate the use of the argumentative operators in the productions of the arguments in opinion articles written by students in 9th year and to analyze the impact of the teacher’s methodological action in the exercise of the argumentative competence in students’ oral and written productions. The raised questions were: How demonstrate students´ argumentative competence in their written productions? And what methodologies strategy developed in the educational sequence contributed for the development of argumentative competence demonstrated? The results of the research show that the students have conscience of the necessity to present arguments for defense of a point of view in oral and written modalities. However, such conscience, for itself, doesn’t answer for productions said as “well done” that school demands from these students. The systematized teaching, organized around an educational sequence about the study of the argumentation, returned for the students specific necessities, was able to evidence significant improvements in students´ argumentative productions. So, we noticed that development students´ argumentative competence demonstrated in the classroom, during the interaction, as well as in written productions, received direct influence from teacher’s methodological actions since the treatment given to such object of study, promoted theoretical contributions about the contemplated object, since matured around student’s learning.
Ribeiro, Tatiane Silva. "Operadores argumentativos como construtores de sentido em editoriais de O Globo." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2013. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=5349.
Full textThis research proposes a study of the editorial genre seen as an article that expresses the company's position facing journalistic issues that circulate in society. We will observe that the company's thinking is reinforced through the use of argumentative mechanisms, which may go "unnoticed", but are essential to establish the position of the newspaper, making us believe that, despite the "informative guise", that is, the simple emission of a fact, it intends to lead the reader to sharing the same point of view. We will discuss the main characteristics of journalism, emphasizing the concept of ideology and the function of it in the past to understand the present. We will also emphasize that the argument is intertwined to humans, since every language pursues, in its grammar, mechanisms to indicate the orientation of argumentative statements, which can target their meaning. The analysis was made based on the study of argumentative operators, taking into account, of course, that the process of constructing meaning from a text also involves understanding the socio-historical moment to understand the authors communicative purpose. Every text has a purpose and understanding this phenomenon is extremely beneficial because it means developing a social consciousness. The genres that are part of everyday life, such as editorials, chronicles, commercial letters and digests are indispensable in order to have critical readers, always emphasizing that knowledge of the world and, especially, of the native language, contribute to the achievement of this purpose
Perret, Jérémy. "Parsing dialogue and argumentative structures." Thesis, Toulouse 3, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016TOU30350/document.
Full textThis work presents novel techniques for parsing the structures of multi-party dialogue and argumentative texts. Finding the structure of extended texts and conversations is a critical step towards the extraction of their underlying meaning. The task is notoriously hard, as discourse is a high-level description of language, and multi-party dialogue involves many complex linguistic phenomena. Historically, representation of discourse moved from local relationships, forming unstructured collections, towards trees, then constrained graphs. Our work uses the latter framework, through Segmented Discourse Representation Theory. We base our research on a annotated corpus of English chats from the board game The Settlers of Catan. Per the strategic nature of the conversation and the freedom of online chat, these dialogues exhibit complex discourse units, interwoven threads, among other features which are mostly overlooked by the current parsing literature. We discuss two corpus-related experiments. The first expands the definition of the Right Frontier Constraint, a formalization of discourse coherence principles, to adapt it to multi-party dialogue. The second demonstrates a data extraction process giving a strategic advantage to an artificial player of Settlers by inferring its opponents' assets from chat negotiations. We propose new methods to parse dialogue, using jointly machine learning, graph algorithms and linear optimization, to produce rich and expressive structures with greater accuracy than previous attempts. We describe our method of constrained discourse parsing, first on trees using the Maximum Spanning Tree algorithm, then on directed acyclic graphs using Integer Linear Programming with a number of original constraints. We finally apply these methods to argumentative structures, on a corpus of English and German texts, jointly annotated in two discourse representation frameworks and one argumentative. We compare the three annotation layers, and experiment on argumentative parsing, achieving better performance than similar works
Bezerra, Iray Almeida. "As teorias argumentativas subjacentes em propostas de produÃÃo de textos em livros didÃticos de lÃngua portuguesa do ensino mÃdio." Universidade Federal do CearÃ, 2015. http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=16785.
Full textO uso de textos argumentativos cresceu muito, hoje, tanto em vestibulares, concursos e, mais notadamente, na redaÃÃo do Enem, que exige um texto dissertativo-argumentativo. Dada a importÃncia desse tipo de texto para a formaÃÃo de cidadÃos crÃticos e que saibam expressar pontos de vista sobre assuntos polÃmicos, faz-se, cada vez mais, atenÃÃo quanto à formulaÃÃo da argumentaÃÃo. Em vista disso, esta pesquisa tem como foco o estudo da argumentaÃÃo nos livros didÃticos, para o que se vale da perspectiva de Perelman e Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), e a SequÃncia Argumentativa, de Adam (1992, 2008), com o objetivo de investigar quais teorias argumentativas estÃo subjacentes Ãs propostas de produÃÃo de texto encontradas nos gÃneros argumentativos em livros didÃticos do Ensino MÃdio analisados. Para selecionarmos os gÃneros argumentativos nas trÃs coleÃÃes de LÃngua Portuguesa direcionadas ao ensino mÃdio e 37 propostas de produÃÃo de texto selecionadas baseadas em propostas do Enem e na redaÃÃo escolar, pautamo-nos em Dolz, Noverraz e Schneully (2004). Assim, por meio da anÃlise das propostas, verificamos que a maioria das produÃÃes de texto sÃo exploradas seguindo os critÃrios da SequÃncia Argumentativa, como defende Adam, porÃm, as estratÃgias argumentativas, como propÃe a Nova RetÃrica, passa ao largo. Os resultados nos permitem concluir que, nesse tema, o avanÃo teÃrico aliado à prÃtica ainda à âtÃmidoâ, logo, os professores devem ficar atentos para complementar com as informaÃÃes necessÃrias à construÃÃo do texto argumentativo ou dissertativo-argumentativo, como quer o gÃnero redaÃÃo escolar e a proposta do Enem.
The use of argumentative texts has grown today, both in vestibular, contests and, most notably, in the writing of Enem, which requires a dissertative-argumentative text. Given the importance of this type of text to the formation of critical citizens and able to express views on controversial issues, it is, more and more attention on the formulation of the argument. As a result, this research focuses on the study of argument in textbooks, for what is worth the prospect of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), and the Argumentative Sequence, of Adam (1992, 2008), in order to investigate argumentative theories which underlie text production proposals found in the argumentative genres in textbooks for high school analyzed. Select for the argumentative genres in three collections of Portuguese Language directed to high school and 37 texts production proposals selected based on Enem proposals and school essay, we support us in Dolz, Noverraz and Schneully (2004). Thus, by analyzing the proposals, we find that most of the text productions are explored following the criteria of Argumentative Sequence, as Adam defends, however, the argumentative strategies, as proposed by the New Rhetoric, passes off. It follows that, on this issue, the theoretical allied advance the practice is still "shy", so teachers should be alert to complement with the necessary information for the construction of argumentative or dissertative-argumentative text, whatever school essay and the proposal on Enem.
AMARAL, Stefânio Ramalho do. "Estratégias argumentativas de universitários: estudo comparativo de três práticas pedagógicas." Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2016. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/18864.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2017-05-23T12:47:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) @ STEFÂNIO AMARAL - biblioteca - FINAL.pdf: 1963384 bytes, checksum: fe89df35e593e6c0282f29835617dffd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-24
CNPQ
Este estudo teve objetivo de investigar possíveis diferenças no raciocínio argumentativo de estudantes universitários que passaram por três diferentes práticas pedagógicas. O raciocínio argumentativo é compreendido como uma atividade fundamentalmente metacognitiva, realizada através de estratégias como justificação de ideias, antecipação de perspectivas alternativas e contrárias, e réplica a perspectivas divergentes (KUHN, 1991). A especificidade analítica consistiu na comparação de estratégias argumentativas exibidas pelos participantes na reflexão sobre assuntos quotidianos e controversos. A partir de adaptações do roteiro de entrevista proposto por Kuhn (1991), foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas individuais sobre dois tópicos quotidianos, sociais e polemizáveis, sobre os quais os participantes poderiam elaborar suas perspectivas (teorias causais), justificá-las usando evidências, antecipar possíveis teorias alternativas e contra-argumentos, e replicar a estas perspectivas divergentes. Participaram do estudo 15 indivíduos, distribuídos em três grupos, de acordo com as disciplinas cursadas: seis estudantes de uma disciplina que foca a argumentação como mediadora para ensino-aprendizagem de conteúdos curriculares de psicologia, quatro estudantes de uma disciplina introdutória à lógica e cinco estudantes de um terceiro curso de humanidades, o qual não possui regularmente em sua estrutura curricular práticas com foco específico no raciocínio de estudantes. Os dados foram analisados em dois níveis: identificação, no conjunto de dados, das categorias propostas por Kuhn (1991), e comparação dos grupos quanto a possíveis diferenças nas estratégias argumentativas exibidas pelos participantes na reflexão sobre os tópicos propostos. As análises mostraram que a inserção em disciplinas focadas na melhoria do raciocínio (DIP e DIL) mobiliza no indivíduo uma tendência a refletir sobre os fundamentos (através da elaboração de evidências) e limites de suas ideias (antecipando contra-argumentos e teorias alternativas). Discute-se que fatores como motivação, falta de preparo prévio e conceituações acerca do objetivo central da argumentação (defesa do próprio ponto de vista e consideração de perspectivas alternativas) podem explicar o limitado desempenho observado em algumas competências.
This study aims to investigate possible differences in argumentative reasoning of university students who have gone through three different pedagogical experiences. The argumentative reasoning is understood as a fundamentally metacognitive activity held through strategies such as justification of ideas, anticipation of alternative and opposing perspectives, and rebuttal of divergent perspectives (KUHN, 1991). The analytical specificity of this study consists on comparison of argumentative strategies that appear as one thinks about everyday and controversial topics. The method was based in adaptations of the interview script proposed by Kuhn (1991), that is, individual semi-structured interviews about two common, social and controversial topics in which participants should develop their perspectives (causal theories), justify them using evidence, anticipate alternative theories and counter-arguments, and rebuttal these divergent perspectives. The study included 15 participants divided into three groups according to the subjects they studied: six students of a course that focuses on the argument as a mediator of teaching and learning of contents from psychology curriculum (DIP), four students of Introduction to Logic (DIL), five students of another humanities course which does not focus on the development of the reasoning. The data were analyzed in two levels: analysis in order to identify the set of the data collected among the categories proposed by Kuhn (1991), and compare possible differences in argumentative strategies displayed by the participants in the debate on the proposed topics. The analysis showed that the inclusion of disciplines that focused on the improvement of reasoning (DIP and DIL) mobilizes in the individual a tendency to think about the grounds (through the development of evidence) and limits of their ideas (anticipating counter-arguments and alternative theories). So this study argues that factors such as motivation, lack of prior preparation and concepts about the main objective of the argument (defense's own point of view and consideration of alternative perspectives) can explain the weak performance observed in some skills.
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja. "Argumentative text structure and translation." Jyväskylä : University of Jyväskylä, 1985. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/13332106.html.
Full textMercier, Hugo. "La théorie argumentative du raisonnement." Phd thesis, Ecole pratique des hautes études - EPHE PARIS, 2009. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00396731.
Full textBraaksma, Martine Anne Henriëtte. "Observational learning in argumentative writing." [S.l. : Amsterdam : s.n.] ; Universiteit van Amsterdam [Host], 2002. http://dare.uva.nl/document/39582.
Full textMohamed, Abdelhamid Elgayly. "L'origine des difficultés liées à l'usage des connecteurs argumentatifs «mais, et, pourtant, d'ailleurs, par ailleurs et d'autre part», par les apprenants soudanais universitaires de FLE : le cas d'étude, les apprenants de quatrième année à l'Université du Soudan de Sciences et de Technologie." Thesis, Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017UBFCC007.
Full textThis current study attempts to identify the difficulties related to the usage of certain argumentative markers: mais, et, d’ailleurs, par ailleurs, pourtant and d’autre part”, by the Sudanese students of French as a foreign language. It examines more precisely the problem regarding the usage of argumentative connectors by these students when producing anargumentative text. Data were collected through writing production of the 4th year students at the French language department, college of languages – Sudan university of Sciences and Technology. Analyzing their written production aimed to know the origin of these difficulties so as to provide remedy to them. The study results showed that learners have serious problems when using connectors in their production. This is noticeable not only at the complex sentence level but at the text as well, affecting its coherence and cohesion. Inorder to solve this problem, the researcher proposed for each connecter a number of didactic sequences susceptible to enable the students to master their usage. This thesis presents results regarding the application of the sequences on the students. It also demonstrates that these proposed sequences constitute an effective solution for the acquisition of this essential dimension of the argumentative writing technique
Books on the topic "Argumentative"
Ducrot, Oswald. Slovenian lectures = Conférences slovènes: Argumentative semantics = sémantique argumentative. Edited by Žagar Igor Ž. Ljubljana: ISH, 1996.
Find full textEemeren, F. H. van, and Bart Garssen. Exploring argumentative contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2012.
Find full textExploring argumentative contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2012.
Find full textWriting argumentative essays. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 2001.
Find full textvan Eemeren, Frans H., ed. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.
Full textvan Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen, eds. Exploring Argumentative Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aic.4.
Full textWriting argumentative essays. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1998.
Find full textvan, Eemeren F. H., ed. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1993.
Find full textAltmann, Ekkehard. Nutzwertanalyse fur argumentative Planungsprozesse. Bonn: Gesellschaft fur Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung, 1985.
Find full textvan Rees, M. Agnes. Dissociation In Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9150-6.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Argumentative"
Lenders, Winfried. "Argumentative Texte." In Sprache zwischen Theorie und Technologie / Language between Theory and Technology, 149–64. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81289-6_13.
Full textPlantin, Christian. "L’interaction argumentative." In Dialoganalyse VI/1, edited by Svetla Cmejrková, Jana Hoffmannová, and Olga Müllerová, 151–60. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110965056-015.
Full textAndriessen, Jerry E. B., and Baruch B. Schwarz. "Argumentative Design." In Argumentation and Education, 145–74. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_6.
Full textPaglieri, Fabio. "Pandemic Communication Without Argumentative Strategy in the Digital Age: A Cautionary Tale and a Call to Arms." In The Pandemic of Argumentation, 145–61. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_8.
Full textMusi, Elena, and Andrea Rocci. "Staying Up to Date with Fact and Reason Checking: An Argumentative Analysis of Outdated News." In The Pandemic of Argumentation, 311–30. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_16.
Full textvan Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen. "Argumentation by Analogy in Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns." In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy, 41–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_3.
Full textBermejo-Luque, Lilian. "Chapter 3. Argumentative and non-argumentative rhetorical content." In Argumentation across Communities of Practice, 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aic.10.04ber.
Full textvan Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. "Analyzing Argumentative Discourse." In Argumentation Library, 487–506. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_25.
Full textvan Eemeren, Frans H. "Prototypical Argumentative Patterns." In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, 149–68. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6_9.
Full textChung, Carl, and Ann-Sofie Susen. "Argumentative Handlungsfähigkeit trainieren." In Strategien der extremen Rechten, 675–90. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01984-6_32.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Argumentative"
Rago, Antonio, Pietro Baroni, and Francesca Toni. "Explaining Causal Models with Argumentation: the Case of Bi-variate Reinforcement." In 19th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2022}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/52.
Full textBaffa Lourenço, Ariane, Salete Linhares Queiroz, and Armin Weinberger. "PRE-SERVICE CHEMISTRY TEACHERS´ BELIEFS ABOUT ARGUMENTATION AND ARGUMENTATIVE PRACTICE." In 3rd International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2019). Scientia Socialis Ltd., 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/balticste/2019.14.
Full textČyras, Kristijonas, Antonio Rago, Emanuele Albini, Pietro Baroni, and Francesca Toni. "Argumentative XAI: A Survey." In Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-21}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/600.
Full textHoltermann, Carolin, Anne Lauscher, and Simone Ponzetto. "Fair and Argumentative Language Modeling for Computational Argumentation." In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.541.
Full textToni, F. "Argumentative agents." In 2010 International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology (IMCSIT 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/imcsit.2010.5680035.
Full textRuch, Patrick, Imad Tbahriti, Julien Gobeill, and Alan R. Aronson. "Argumentative feedback." In the COLING/ACL. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1273073.1273160.
Full textHeyninck, Jesse, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Tjitze Rienstra, Kenneth Skiba, and Matthias Thimm. "Revision and Conditional Inference for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks." In 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2021}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/33.
Full textHaddadan, Shohreh, Elena Cabrio, and Serena Villata. "DISPUTool -- A tool for the Argumentative Analysis of Political Debates." In Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/944.
Full textFishcheva, I. N., D. Osadchiy, K. O. Bochenina, and E. V. Kotelnikov. "Argumentative Text Generation in Economic Domain." In Dialogue. RSUH, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2075-7182-2022-21-211-222.
Full textHuang, Xiaorong. "Planning argumentative texts." In the 15th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991886.991943.
Full textReports on the topic "Argumentative"
Rupp, Kathryn, Karyn Higgs, M. Anne Britt, Steven McGee, Randi McGee-Tekula, and Kathleen Easley. Scaffolding Scientific Argumentation in a Science Inquiry Unit. The Learning Partnership, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51420/conf.2022.2.
Full textKozachenko, Nadiia. Artificial relevance as a way to strengthen an argument. The Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/6685.
Full textValera-Ordaz, L., D. Calvo, and G. López García. Political conversations on Facebook. Exploring the role of homophily in argumentation and communicative interaction. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, January 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2018-1245en.
Full textGómez Tamayo, Daniel Fernando. La despenalización de la eutanasia en Colombia: un análisis argumentativo de la Sentencia C-239/1997 de la Corte Constitucional. Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, August 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.16925/gclc.11.
Full textKozachenko, Nadiia. Artificial relevance as a way to strengthen an argument : presentation. Department of Philosophy, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/6686.
Full textAhumada Escobar, Diego Alejandro. Elaboración de los fundamentos de derecho de una demanda en la jurisdicción ordinaria. Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, December 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.16925/gcgp.61.
Full textLylo, Taras. Ideologemes of modern Russian propaganda in Mikhail Epstein’s essayistic interpretations. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, February 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2022.51.11404.
Full textWagenknecht, Katherin, Sarah Klemisch, and Kamila Labuda. Towards Citizen Science Communication : How can citizen science enhance science communication? Technische Hochschule Wildau, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.15771/innohub_2.
Full textLylo, Taras. THE IDEOLOGEME «DICTATORSHIP OF RELATIVISM» IN THE ROBERTO DE MATTEI’S ESSAYS: POSTMODERN AND POST-COMMUNIST CONTEXTS. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2021.50.11100.
Full textDöring, Thomas. John Maynard Keynes und der Friedensvertrag von Versailles – Eine Rekonstruktion aus Sicht der Verhaltensökonomik. Sonderforschungsgruppe Institutionenanalyse, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.46850/sofia.9783941627239.
Full text