Relevant bibliographies by topics / Antisocial lie telling

Academic literature on the topic 'Antisocial lie telling'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Antisocial lie telling.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Antisocial lie telling"

1

Talwar, Victoria, Shanna Mary Williams, Sarah-Jane Renaud, Cindy Arruda, and Christine Saykaly. "Children’s Evaluations of Tattles, Confessions, Prosocial and Antisocial Lies." International Review of Pragmatics 8, no. 2 (2016): 334–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00802007.

Full text
Abstract:
Lie-telling is a false verbal statement made with the intention to deceive another. Lies may be told for selfish reasons or due to prosocial motivations. As a result, the veracity of a statement holds more than just communicative intent but rather represents social intentions. In the current experiment children (6- to 12-years old) viewed 12 vignettes which depicted a protagonist either telling a truth or a lie. The protagonist’s statements either hurt another or themselves (other versus self). Following viewing of each vignette participants provided a moral evaluation of the protagonist’s statement (five-point Likert) and a classification of the statements; as either a truth or lie. Additionally, a novel method of evaluating statements was introduced, whereby children evaluated communicative intent as an act, to be rewarded or punished. Results revealed that both lies and truths were accurately identified, with the exception of altruistic lies (benefits to another) and tattling truths (harms another). Younger children rewarded truthful statements, which harmed or hurt another, significantly more often than older children. Older children ranked lies to help another significantly more favorably than lies to protect the self. Children also rewarded confessions and punished antisocial lies most frequently. Results highlight the notable differences in children’s perceptions of varying forms of honesty and lying.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Williams, Shanna, Karissa Leduc, Angela Crossman, and Victoria Talwar. "Young Deceivers: Executive Functioning and Antisocial Lie-telling in Preschool Aged Children." Infant and Child Development 26, no. 1 (January 11, 2016): e1956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.1956.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Carl, Talia, and Kay Bussey. "Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between children's moral standards and their antisocial lie telling." Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 80 (May 2022): 101411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101411.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Aydın, Muhammed Şükrü. "29-72 aylık çocukların olumsuz ve prososyal yalan söyleme davranışlarının incelenmesi." Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi 5, no. 1 (March 31, 2021): 92–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.24130/eccd-jecs.1967202151234.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mugno, Allison P., Lindsay C. Malloy, Daniel A. Waschbusch, William E. Pelham Jr., and Victoria Talwar. "An Experimental Investigation of Antisocial Lie‐Telling Among Children With Disruptive Behavior Disorders and Typically Developing Children." Child Development 90, no. 3 (October 27, 2017): 774–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12985.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Fu, Genyue, Kang Lee, Catherine Ann Cameron, and Fen Xu. "Chinese and Canadian Adults’ Categorization and Evaluation of Lie- and Truth-Telling about Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32, no. 6 (November 2001): 720–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032006005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lavoie, Jennifer, Sarah Yachison, Angela Crossman, and Victoria Talwar. "Polite, instrumental, and dual liars." International Journal of Behavioral Development 41, no. 2 (July 9, 2016): 257–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025415626518.

Full text
Abstract:
Lying is an interpersonal exercise that requires the intentional creation of a false belief in another’s mind. As such, children’s development of lie-telling is related to their increasing understanding of others and may reflect the acquisition of basic social skills. Although certain types of lies may support social relationships, other types of lies are considered antisocial in nature. The goal of this study was to compare several possible correlates, such as cognitive ability and children’s behavior patterns, that may be associated with children’s ( N = 133) use of lies in socially acceptable versus socially unacceptable ways. Children engaged in two lie-telling paradigms: one to measure socially accepted (polite) lies and one to measure socially unaccepted (instrumental) lies. Results indicate that instrumental liars were young with low theory of mind (ToM) scores and had high social skills. Polite liars were the oldest, had high ToM, and had similar levels of social skills as instrumental liars. Truth-tellers and dual liars had lower social skills and moderate ToM in comparison to the instrumental and polite liars. These findings suggest that children use lies selectively to achieve their social goals, and also suggest that children’s lying behavior may change from being self-motivated to being other-motivated as they age, which may reflect socialization toward socially accepted behavior.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hutchins, Tiffany L. "A Review of the Nature and Development of Lying and Deception and Considerations for Teaching Prosocial Lying to Autistic Persons." Seminars in Speech and Language 43, no. 04 (July 27, 2022): 316–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750350.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractCompared with their neurotypical (NT) counterparts, persons with autism appear to be less inclined to tell lies and less skilled in delivering sophisticated forms of deception. At the same time, some forms of deception like white lies and prosocial lies are frequent in human interaction because they are important for social success. This article challenges the reader to evaluate the therapeutic potential for prosocial deception and teaching white-lie telling to autistic persons. The nature and development of antisocial and prosocial lying in NT development and autism are reviewed. Considerations for when to (and when not to) teach the skill of empathic lying are discussed and recommendations for how to teach the comprehension and production of prosocial lies are offered.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lavoie, Jennifer, Joshua Wyman, Angela M. Crossman, and Victoria Talwar. "Lie-telling as a mode of antisocial action: Children’s lies and behavior problems." Journal of Moral Education, January 8, 2018, 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1405343.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Behnk, Sascha, and Ernesto Reuben. "On Lies and Hard Truths." Frontiers in Psychology 12 (July 7, 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687913.

Full text
Abstract:
We run an experimental study using sender-receiver games to evaluate how senders' willingness to lie to others compares to their willingness to tell hard truths, i.e., promote an outcome that the sender knows is unfair to the receiver without explicitly lying. Unlike in previous work on lying when it has consequences, we do not find that antisocial behavior is less frequent when it involves lying than when it does not. In fact, we find the opposite result in the setting where there is social contact between senders and receivers, and receivers have enough information to judge whether they have been treated unfairly. In this setting, we find that senders prefer to hide behind a lie and implement the antisocial outcome by being dishonest rather than by telling the truth. These results are consistent with social image costs depending on the social proximity between senders and receivers, especially when receivers can judge the kindness of the senders' actions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography