Academic literature on the topic 'Anthropological museums and collections Social aspects'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Anthropological museums and collections Social aspects.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Anthropological museums and collections Social aspects"
Silva, Fabíola A., and Cesar Gordon. "Anthropology in the museum reflections on the curatorship of the Xikrin Collection." Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 10, no. 1 (June 2013): 425–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1809-43412013000100018.
Full textIsaac, Gwyneira, Kate Clark, Kelsey Adams, Heather Ashe, Katie Benz, Delaney Cummings, David Gassett, Francine Margolis, Amanda Quink, and Emily Somberg. "Anthropology, Museums and the Body: Lessons From an Experimental Teaching Environment." Museum and Society 17, no. 3 (November 29, 2019): 472–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.29311/mas.v17i3.3413.
Full textDubois, Arnaud. "How to understand engineering sciences with the techniques of the body: The case of the bridges collection of the Musée des Arts et Métiers explained by circus acrobatics." Social Science Information 56, no. 2 (April 13, 2017): 254–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0539018417697387.
Full textCrooke, Elizabeth. "The Construction of Meanings in Museums." Archaeological Dialogues 7, no. 2 (December 2000): 130–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1380203800001689.
Full textNadim, Tahani, Barbara A. R. Mohr, and Sarah A. Löwe. "Reconstructions of a historic paleontological collection: Diversity re-created." Earth Sciences History 34, no. 2 (January 1, 2015): 348–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17704/1944-6187-34.2.348.
Full textVladimir, Zheleznyak. "Art and Folk Things: Based on Vladimir Arkhipov's Exhibition at the Permm Museum." TECHNOLOGOS, no. 3 (2022): 53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2022.3.05.
Full textCardozo, Thiago Minete, and Costas Papadopoulos. "Heritage Artefacts in the COVID-19 Era: The Aura and Authenticity of 3D Models." Open Archaeology 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 519–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0147.
Full textMihaescu, Cristina, Cristina Ponepal, Monica Marilena Tantu, Gheorghita Brinzea, Nicolae Brinzea, Liliana Cristina Soare, and Alina Paunescu. "ASPECTS REGARDING THE ATTACK OF SOME BIODETERIOGENS ON SOME CULT OBJECTS FROM ARGES COUNTY." Current Trends in Natural Sciences 11, no. 22 (December 31, 2022): 172–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.47068/ctns.2022.v11i22.020.
Full textKuleva, Olesya V. "Virtual Museum in the Library: Models and Technologies of Creation." Bibliotekovedenie [Library and Information Science (Russia)] 67, no. 4 (October 20, 2018): 463–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2018-67-4-463-471.
Full textFoster, Sally M., and Neil G. W. Curtis. "The Thing about Replicas—Why Historic Replicas Matter." European Journal of Archaeology 19, no. 1 (2016): 122–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1461957115y.0000000011.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Anthropological museums and collections Social aspects"
Mattson, Linda Karen. "Examination of the systems of authority of three Canadian museums and the challenges of Aboriginal peoples." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/nq25108.pdf.
Full textFitzpatrick, Peter Gerard Media Arts College of Fine Arts UNSW. "The Doulgas Summerland collection." 2007. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/44257.
Full textBooks on the topic "Anthropological museums and collections Social aspects"
Museums: A visual anthropology. London: Berg, 2012.
Find full text1933-, Ames Michael M., ed. Cannibal tours and glass boxes: The anthropology of museums. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1992.
Find full textR, Watson Sheila E., ed. Museums and their communities. New York: Routledge, 2007.
Find full textScott, Monique. Evolution in the museum: Envisioning African origins. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2008.
Find full text1957-, Cassman Vicki, Odegaard Nancy, and Powell Joseph F. 1964-, eds. Human remains: Guide for museums and academic institutions. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2007.
Find full textUniversity of British Columbia. Museum of Anthropology., ed. Preserving what is valued: Museums, conservation, and First Nations. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2002.
Find full textMuseums, objects, and collections: A cultural study. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1992.
Find full textPearce, Susan M. Museums, objects, and collections: A cultural study. Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1993.
Find full textViga, Gyula, and Arnold Tóth. Néprajz--muzeológia: Tanulmányok a múzeumi tudományok köréből a 60 éves Viga Gyula tiszteletére. Miskolc: Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Megyei Múzeumi Igazgatóság, 2012.
Find full textColonialismo missionario. Roma: Aracne editrice S.r.l., 2014.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Anthropological museums and collections Social aspects"
Apollonio, Fabrizio Ivan, Marco Gaiani, and Simone Garagnani. "Visualization and Fruition of Cultural Heritage in the Knowledge-Intensive Society." In Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, 471–95. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4854-0.ch020.
Full textLabrum, Bronwyn. "Collecting, curating and exhibiting cross-cultural material histories in a post-settler society." In Curatopia, 244–61. Manchester University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526118196.003.0016.
Full textSenchenko, Natalia. "DIGITATING THE DOCUMENTARY HERITAGE AS A WAY TO SAVE IT: A WORLD EXPERIENCE." In Theoretical and practical aspects of the development of modern scientific research. Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-195-4-21.
Full text"interpreted in different ways by individual scholars. Why, for example, is the preponderance of male depictions seen at Grot ta di Porto Badisco interpeted as meaning male domination of Neolithic society in Italy (Whitehouse, 1992b) whereas Hodder (1990: 68) declines to interpret the common occurrence of female figurines in the Neolithic of S.E. Europe as an indication of an equivalent female domination of society, but instead suggests "To put it over-simply, women may or may not have had any real power in the Neolithic of S.E. Europe, but certain aspects of being a woman were conceptually central."? One can cite a similar example from Skeates (1994: 207-8), where he accepts Whitehouse's identification of the human figures as males or females, but disagrees with her interpretation of male dominance and hostility between the sexes in Italian Neolithic society. Each of these two scholars also has their own interpretation of the important group 16 painted scene from the Grotta do Porto Badisco — needless to say, I also have mine. By turning to burial evidence, can one avoid the above dilemmas? Physical anthropological methods can be used to identify male and female human remains, and, knowing the sex of burials could then lead to a better understanding of the gender affiliations of accompanying grave goods. These artefacts can then be investigated in other contexts such as settlement sites. However, there is a surprising amount of uncertainty involved in sexing human remains. In this paper I wish to discuss the uncertainties in the physical anthropological methods of sexing human remains and their implications for gender studies by focussing on a recent analysis of an Iron Age necropolis at Pontecagnario, Campania, carried out by Vida Navarro (1992). PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL METHODS OF SEXING HUMAN REMAINS Since gender is culturally constructed, it is possible for individuals or groups to have a gender that is different from their biological sex, or is intermediate or anomalous in some way. For example, in Ancient Rome, a Vestal Virgin had an ambiguous status in Roman society as shown by the fact that she could give evidence in a law court like a man. Usually Roman women had to be represented by a male relation or their spouse and could not speak in court on their own behalf or give evidence (Beard 1980: 17). Nevertheless, a Vestal Virgin was still a woman, and was allowed to marry, if she so wished, after her term of office finished (Beard 1980:, 14, note 21). Although ambiguous groups of this kind have been recognised in many societies, it is nonetheless the case that one would expect a high level of correlation between biological sex and social gender. The accurate identification of the biological sex of human remains would therefore be a great step forward in understanding gender construction and gender roles in prehistory. Unfortunately, physical anthropological methods are reliable only to a certain extent, and it is important for all archaeologists to be aware of the limitations of these methods. Like other primates, humans show sexual dimorphism i.e., the males have a larger body and show other skeletal differences from females, especially in the shape of the pelvis. When an intact pelvis is present in a burial, the identification of those remains as male or female can be made with 95% confidence (Krogman & Iscan 1986: 259). This, of course, applies to recent skeletal material, as the morphological and morphometric methods for sex identification used by anthropologists are based on reference collections from modern human populations. As Gotherstrom et ¿z/. (1997) point out, the application of these standards to prehistoric remains may be inappropriate. Prehistoric females may have been more skeletally robust, so that in the absence of a diagnostic pelvis, they could appear to be males, according to standards derived from modern populations. The pelvis anchors muscles, and "Considering the plasticity of the skeleton in response to external forces and stimuli, there are reasons to proceed with caution in interpreting all morphological differences in the pelvic region as a result of differential reproductive function." (Gotherstrom et al. 1997)." In Gender & Italian Archaeology, 44–58. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315428178-13.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Anthropological museums and collections Social aspects"
Nastase, Mihai-Claudiu, Alexandru Mitru, and Loredana Andreea Paun (Parnic). "The Social and Economic Impact of COVID 19 Pandemic on Museums. Case Study: „Princely Court” National Museum Ensemble." In International Conference Innovative Business Management & Global Entrepreneurship. LUMEN Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/ibmage2020/25.
Full text