Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 10 December 2022

Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Cramer, Marjorie. "Animal Rights/Liberation Philosophy." FASEB Journal 6, no. 7 (April 1992): 2489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.6.7.1563601.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Ballina, R. R. "Animal rights/liberation philosophy." FASEB Journal 6, no. 7 (April 1992): 2489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.6.7.1563604.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Rowlands, Mark. "Contractarianism and Animal Rights." Journal of Applied Philosophy 14, no. 3 (November 1997): 235–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00060.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Macdonald Jr., Paul A. "Animal Subjects and Animal Rights." American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 96, no. 3 (2022): 499–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/acpq2022963256.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Khawaja, Irfan. "The Animal Rights Debate." Teaching Philosophy 26, no. 1 (2003): 105–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200326112.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Sumner, L. W., and Tom Regan. "The Case for Animal Rights." Noûs 20, no. 3 (September 1986): 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215309.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ost, David E. "THE CASE AGAINST ANIMAL RIGHTS." Southern Journal of Philosophy 24, no. 3 (September 1986): 365–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1986.tb01573.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Hadley, John. "Nonhuman Animal Property: Reconciling Environmentalism and Animal Rights." Journal of Social Philosophy 36, no. 3 (September 2005): 305–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00277.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Carter, Alan. "Animal rights and social relations." Res Publica 1, no. 2 (1995): 213–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01113143.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Kemmerer, Lisa. "The Animal Rights Debate." Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8, no. 3 (June 2005): 325–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-9360-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Kemmerer, Lisa. "The Animal Rights Debate." Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8, no. 3 (June 2005): 325–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-9360-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

OLIVER, KELLY. "What Is Wrong with (Animal) Rights?" Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22, no. 3 (January 1, 2008): 214–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25670714.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

OLIVER, KELLY. "What Is Wrong with (Animal) Rights?" Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22, no. 3 (January 1, 2008): 214–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jspecphil.22.3.0214.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Kelly Oliver. "What is Wrong with (Animal) Rights?" Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22, no. 3 (2008): 214–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jsp.0.0043.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Johnson, Andrew. "A Blind Eye to Animal Rights?" Philosophy 64, no. 248 (April 1989): 255–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100044533.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Kymlicka, Will, and Sue Donaldson. "Animal Rights, Multiculturalism, and the Left." Journal of Social Philosophy 45, no. 1 (March 2014): 116–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josp.12047.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Nobis, Nathan. "Carl Cohen's 'Kind' Arguments For Animal Rights and Against Human Rights." Journal of Applied Philosophy 21, no. 1 (January 2004): 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00262.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Aaltola, Elisa. "The Philosophy behind the Movement: Animal Studies versus Animal Rights." Society & Animals 19, no. 4 (2011): 393–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853011x590042.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractRecently, many pro-animal thinkers have expressed critical views on the animal rights movement. In particular, the movement has been criticized for being philosophically uninformed, politically regressive, and practically unpersuasive. This paper investigates these criticisms and seeks to map out the philosophy behind the grassroots animal rights movement, specifically. It concludes that the criticism presented by animal studies scholars is often misplaced due to a lack of understanding of the philosophical notions within the movement, but that the critics are right to argue that the movement needs to place more emphasis on persuasion.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Callicott, J. Baird. "The Case for Animal Rights." Environmental Ethics 7, no. 4 (1985): 365–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19857427.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Schinkel, Anders. "MARTHA NUSSBAUM ON ANIMAL RIGHTS." Ethics & the Environment 13, no. 1 (March 2008): 41–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/ete.2008.13.1.41.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Taylor, Angus. "Animal Rights and Human Needs." Environmental Ethics 18, no. 3 (1996): 249–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199618316.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Hadley, John. "Animal Rights Extremism and the Terrorism Question." Journal of Social Philosophy 40, no. 3 (September 2009): 363–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01457.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Varner, G. "Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions." Philosophical Review 116, no. 2 (April 1, 2007): 281–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-040.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Block, Walter E. "Rejoinder to Huemer on Animal Rights." Studia Humana 10, no. 4 (November 20, 2021): 66–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sh-2021-0023.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Heumer and I debate animal rights, utilitarianism, libertarianism, morality and philosophy. We agree that suffering is a problem, and diverge, widely, on how to deal with it. I maintain that this author’s reputation as a libertarian, let alone an intellectual leader of this movement, is problematic. Why? That is because libertarianism, properly understood, is a theory of intra-human rights; this philosophy says nothing about right from an extra-human perspective, Heumer to the contrary notwithstanding. That is to say, he is improperly importing into the freedom philosophy considerations extraneous to it.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Shapiro, Kenneth J. "Animal Rights Versus Humanism." Journal of Humanistic Psychology 30, no. 2 (April 1990): 9–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167890302002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Sapontzis, Steve F. "Animal rights and biomedical research." Journal of Value Inquiry 26, no. 1 (January 1992): 73–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00136591.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Machan, Tibor R. "Some doubts about animal rights." Journal of Value Inquiry 19, no. 1 (1985): 73–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00151418.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Gibson, Miah. "The Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare." Deakin Law Review 16, no. 2 (December 1, 2011): 539. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2011vol16no2art112.

Full text

Abstract:

Animal law is gaining momentum in Australia and internationally. Initiatives such as the Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare (UDAW) attempt to secure international legal recognition for the principles of animal welfare. The extent to which they do so, however, is a matter of debate, and the subject of this article. Part II of this article outlines the development of the UDAW and current support for it. Part III compares the UDAW to other animal rights/welfare declarations. Part IV describes the animal welfare legislative and policy framework in Australia, and critically examines the impact that the UDAW would have in Australia.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Kumar R, Naresh, and Yudesh Raghavan K. "A STUDY ON ANIMAL RIGHTS." International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology 6, no. 11 (March 1, 2022): 76–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2022.v06i11.016.

Full text

Abstract:

The idea of giving rights to animals has long been contentious—but a deeper look into the reasoning behind the philosophy reveals ideas that aren’t all that radical. Animal rights advocates attempt to distinguish animals from inanimate objects, as they are so often considered by exploitative industries and the law. The animal rights movement strives to make the public aware of the fact that animals are more sensitive, emotional, and intelligent than people have previously believed. But first, it’s important to understand what the term “animal rights” really means. Animal rights is the philosophy according to which many or all sentient animals have moral worth that is independent of their utility for humans, and that their most basic interests—such as in avoiding suffering— should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings. Broadly speaking, and particularly in popular discourse, the term “animal rights” is often used synonymously with “animal protection” or “animal liberation”. More narrowly, “animal rights” refers to the idea that many animals have fundamental rights to be treated with respect as individuals—rights to life, liberty, and freedom from torture that may not be overridden by considerations of aggregate welfare.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Garrett, Aaron. "Francis Hutcheson and the Origin of Animal Rights." Journal of the History of Philosophy 45, no. 2 (2007): 243–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2007.0032.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Varner, Gary E. "The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate." Environmental Ethics 15, no. 3 (1993): 279–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199315321.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Moore, Eric. "The Unequal Case for Animal Rights." Environmental Ethics 24, no. 3 (2002): 295–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200224317.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Block, Walter E. "Animal Rights from the Perspective of Evictionism." Studia Humana 11, no. 2 (June 1, 2022): 10–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0006.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract In this paper, the conception of Anthony J. Cesario about the philosophy of animal rights is critically reviewed. His approach is a valiant effort to defend the philosophy of animal rights. He is a moderate on this matter, offering all sorts of compromises. He applies an unusual insight to this matter with using the libertarian doctrine of evictionism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Levin, Michael. "Reply to Fulda on animal rights." Journal of Value Inquiry 27, no. 1 (January 1993): 111–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01082720.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Hadley, John. "Animal Rights and Self-Defense Theory." Journal of Value Inquiry 43, no. 2 (February 14, 2009): 165–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10790-009-9149-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Nicoll, C. S., and S. M. Russell. "The Unnatural Nature of the Animal Rights/Liberation Philosophy." Experimental Biology and Medicine 205, no. 4 (April 1, 1994): 269–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.3181/00379727-205-43708a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Parker, James. "Help from philosophy: responding to the animal rights challenge." FASEB Journal 8, no. 6 (April 1994): 375–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.8.6.8168687.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

hadley, john. "Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy - by Julian H. Franklin." Philosophical Books 48, no. 2 (April 2007): 187–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.2007.440_13.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Rowlands, Mark, and Gary E. Varner. "In Nature's Interests: Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics." Philosophical Review 109, no. 4 (October 2000): 598. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2693630.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Rowlands, M. "IN NATURE'S INTERESTS: INTERESTS, ANIMAL RIGHTS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS." Philosophical Review 109, no. 4 (October 1, 2000): 598–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-4-598.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Frank, J. "A Constrained-Utility Alternative to Animal Rights." Environmental Values 11, no. 1 (February 1, 2002): 49–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096327102129340975.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Slicer, Deborah. "Your Daughter or Your Dog? A Feminist Assessment of the Animal Research Issue." Hypatia 6, no. 1 (1991): 108–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00212.x.

Full text

Abstract:

I bring several ecofeminist critiques of deep ecology to bear on mainstream animal rights theories, especially on the rights and utilitarian treatments of the animal research issue. Throughout, I show how animal rights issues are feminist issues and clarify the relationship between ecofeminism and animal rights.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Lengauer, Erwin. "Tom Regan’s Philosophy of Animal Rights: Subjects-of-a-Life in the Context of Discussions of Intrinsic and Inherent Worth." Problemos 97 (April 21, 2020): 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/problemos.97.7.

Full text

Abstract:

Modern animal rights debates began in the 1970s, mainly as part of the budding field of applied ethics in Anglo-American philosophy. In just a short time, these animal rights discourses received international academic respect, especially through analytically trained philosophers. Central for this development was the analysis that rights language can be principally used species neutrally. This paper’s contribution is to examine the central terms of Tom Regan’s still widely discussed theory for their actuality and usefulness. Hence strengthening these arguments for modern animal rights theory as a serious approach in (inter)national ethical and legal disputes. Translated from German by Gary Steiner, Bucknell University

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Fulda, Joseph S. "Reply to an objection to animal rights." Journal of Value Inquiry 26, no. 1 (January 1992): 87–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00136592.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Nicoll, Charles S., and Sharon M. Russell. "Mozart, Alexander the Great, and the animal rights/liberation philosophy." FASEB Journal 5, no. 14 (November 1991): 2888–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.5.14.1752356.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Weller, Penny. "Human Rights and Social Justice: the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the quiet revolution in international law." Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice 4 (November 28, 2009): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/psjlsj.v4i0.1167.

Full text

Abstract:

On the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights (UDHR) the Commonwealth Attorney General announced a national public consultation concerning the need for better human rights protection in Australia and the viability of a federal human rights charter. Whether or not the anticipated Charter includes social, economic and cultural rights is directly relevant to questions of social justice in Australia. This paper argues that the legislative acknowledgment of civil and political rights alone will not adequately address the human rights problems that are experienced in Australia. The reluctance to include economic, social and cultural rights in human rights legislation stems from the historical construction of an artificial distinction between civil and political rights, and economic social and cultural rights. This distinction was articulated and embedded in law with the translation of the UDHR into binding international law. It has been accepted and replicated in judicial consideration of the application on human rights legislation at the domestic level. The distinction between the two forms of rights underpins a general ambivalence about the capacity of human rights legislation to deliver social justice and echoes a critical tradition in legal philosophy that cautions against the reification of law. Coming into force early in the 21st century, the Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities illustrates the effort of the international community to recognize and eschew the burden of the false dichotomy between civil and political and economic, social and cultural rights. Acknowledging the indivisible, interdependent and indissociable nature of human rights in Australia is a crucial step toward achieving human rights based social justice.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Kemmerer, Lisa. "Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights, and: Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy (review)." Human Rights Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2007): 271–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2007.0008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Rojahn, Madeleine, and Erin Hawley. "The politics of animal rights activism: A frame analysis of the 2019 national direct action." Australian Journalism Review 43, no. 2 (November 1, 2021): 245–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00080_7.

Full text

Abstract:

This article analyses news coverage of the 2019 animal rights direct action in Australia. A combination of frame and discourse analysis was applied to 39 news texts published between 1 April 2019 and 25 July 2019 across three news outlets ‐ the ABC, Hobart’s Mercury and The Australian. Our analysis paid particular attention to the inclusion of sources, and we found that elite sources dominated the news coverage, resulting in a replication of the very power imbalance that the activists were struggling against. We also found that language choices resulted in the construction of the direct action as threatening, harmful and ‘un-Australian’. Our study shows that Australian news coverage of animal rights activism often marginalizes activist viewpoints, promoting a sense of division rather than diversity. While it is relatively easy for animal rights activists in Australia to gain mainstream news attention, these activists face powerful ideological barriers when attempting to raise awareness of their cause because the news media tends to obscure rather than open the pathway to a constructive public discussion on the issue of animal welfare.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Nelson, John O. "Brute Animals and Legal Rights." Philosophy 62, no. 240 (April 1987): 171–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100064019.

Full text

Abstract:

Various proponents of animal rights—for example, H. J. McCloskey— maintain that while brute animals (henceforth ‘animals’) cannot have; moral rights they can have legal rights. Indeed, McCloskey himself goes so far as to maintain that even inanimate objects are able to have legal rights.1 And why should not inanimate objects be able to? After f all, for there to be a legal right is anything more required than that whatever agency is empowered to issue legal rights simply legislate or proclaim that so-and-so has that legal right?

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Svolba, David. "Is there a Rawlsian Argument for Animal Rights?" Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19, no. 4 (February 22, 2016): 973–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9702-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!