Relevant bibliographies by topics / Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia

Academic literature on the topic 'Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia"

1

Cramer, Marjorie. "Animal Rights/Liberation Philosophy." FASEB Journal 6, no. 7 (April 1992): 2489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.6.7.1563601.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ballina, R. R. "Animal rights/liberation philosophy." FASEB Journal 6, no. 7 (April 1992): 2489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.6.7.1563604.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rowlands, Mark. "Contractarianism and Animal Rights." Journal of Applied Philosophy 14, no. 3 (November 1997): 235–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00060.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Macdonald Jr., Paul A. "Animal Subjects and Animal Rights." American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 96, no. 3 (2022): 499–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/acpq2022963256.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Khawaja, Irfan. "The Animal Rights Debate." Teaching Philosophy 26, no. 1 (2003): 105–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200326112.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sumner, L. W., and Tom Regan. "The Case for Animal Rights." Noûs 20, no. 3 (September 1986): 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215309.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ost, David E. "THE CASE AGAINST ANIMAL RIGHTS." Southern Journal of Philosophy 24, no. 3 (September 1986): 365–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1986.tb01573.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hadley, John. "Nonhuman Animal Property: Reconciling Environmentalism and Animal Rights." Journal of Social Philosophy 36, no. 3 (September 2005): 305–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00277.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Carter, Alan. "Animal rights and social relations." Res Publica 1, no. 2 (1995): 213–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01113143.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kemmerer, Lisa. "The Animal Rights Debate." Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8, no. 3 (June 2005): 325–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-9360-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia"

1

Schultz-Bergin, Marcus Ryan Schultz-Bergin. "Animal Rights in a Diverse Society." Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1510665229684192.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Childers, Lindsey. "Extending Human Compassion by Implementing Legal Rights for Animals." ScholarWorks@UNO, 2013. http://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses/31.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this essay is to critically examine the current legal status of animals in the United States and offer possible alternatives to the current legal rights for animals. This essay examines the failures of the legal system in protecting animals that have abilities very similar to our own. With an examination of these types of animals, this essay will explain why some animals merit the status of legal personhood to protect them from being carelessly used by others. Ultimately, this essay is an attempt to open the field of legal protection for many animals starting with a few through legal personhood.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Munro, Lyle 1944. "Beasts abstract not : a sociology of animal protection." Monash University, School of Political and Social Inquiry, 2002. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/7967.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Tagha, Yuninui Eric. "Ethics and Animal Experimentation in the Laboratory. A Critical Analysis of the Arguments for"Animal Rights"and"Animal Equality"." Thesis, Linköping University, Centre for Applied Ethics, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-2920.

Full text
Abstract:

Growing up as a child, we had a Dog. To us, it was like a means to an end. That is, hunting other animals for food and for protection, with no special care and treatment given to this animal. Butas days passed by I began to witness a wind of change against such actions. I was made to understand that we were committing two crimes-: using the Dog as a means to an end (for hunting and for eating animals). Today almost every newspaper has something to say about the treatment of animals by humans, especially in their use as experimentation subjects. This has led to the wide spread arguments about “Animal right” and “Animal equality” Advocates of the above arguments hold that just like humans, animals too have rights and are in many ways like humans. There also exist animal right groups. Organisations and countries now have laws regulating animal used in the laboratory. If I may be permitted, I will want to say that the world is in a state of dilemma regarding animal experimentation. While some argue against it, based on the claim that these animals have no right and are not equal to humans, others argue in favour of it on claims that animals have moral rights, feel pain and suffer just like humans and should not be subjected to painful experiments. I then begin to wander how research on animals to improve human health should not be undertaken just because it is claimed that these animals have rights and are in many ways equal to humans. It is the contention of this paper to find out the extent to which animal rights and animal equality justifies the fight against animal experimentation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ferrigno, Mayra Vergotti 1984. "Veganismo e libertação animal = um estudo etnográfico." [s.n.], 2012. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/279340.

Full text
Abstract:
Orientador: Ronaldo Rômulo Machado de Almeida
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-20T06:06:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ferrigno_MayraVergotti_M.pdf: 3901708 bytes, checksum: 6fe4b8a46e9fa9ebee88b253ea7784ec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012
Resumo: A partir de estudo etnográfico em congressos, manifestações públicas e encontros organizados ao redor do tema do vegetarianismo e da luta pelos direitos animais, a dissertação descreve a formação e a dinâmica de um movimento político em território brasileiro, expondo as principais discussões que mobilizam os ativistas na busca da emancipação dos animais na sociedade. Orientada pelo debate antropológico contemporâneo, voltado para observação das relações entre humanos e não-humanos, pode-se analisar uma discussão atual, na qual os atores não-humanos adquirem status de sujeito, o que mobiliza humanos na formação de um novo modo de fazer política e de se relacionar, em variadas esferas da vida social: a mudança de hábitos alimentares (disseminação da dieta vegetariana), o entretenimento (fim do uso de animais em circos, rodeios, touradas), bem como a revisão e a reflexão profundas sobre o modo de produção científica (fim dos testes em animais em pesquisas biomédicas e início de uma visão, dentro das ciências humanas, que encare seres não-humanos como atores sociais)
Abstract: Starting from an ethnographic study at conferences, public events and meetings organized around the theme of the vegetarianism and the struggle for animal rights, the manuscript describes the formation and dynamics of a political movement in Brazilian territory, exposing the main discussions that mobilize activists in pursuit of the emancipation of the animals in society. Guided by contemporary anthropological debate, aimed at observing the relationship between humans and nonhumans, can analyze a current discussion, in which nonhumans acquire status of subject, which mobilizes humans to the formation of a new way of doing politics and the relationship in various spheres of social life: changing eating habits (spread of vegetarian diet), entertainment (ending the use of animals in circuses, rodeos, bullfights), as well as review and reflection about scientific production (end of animal testing in biomedical researches and the beginning of a vision within the Human sciences, which sees non-human beings as social actors)
Mestrado
Antropologia Social
Mestre em Antropologia Social
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kluyts, Johan Francois. "Animal Liberation : 'n kritiese bespreking vanuit 'n filosofies-veekundige perspektief." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/71888.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (MPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2012.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: 1. The purpose of the first chapter was to give a short introduction to the study. Philosophy is the search for wisdom; to know what a virtuous life is and to know what the morally correct thing to do is. Our lifelong relationship with animals, our attitudes towards them and the ways we treat them are some of the issues that beg philosophers to think. An important question in this regard is if it is morally correct to eat meat or should humans become vegetarian. To answer this question the „Animal Liberation‟ argument, as presented by Peter Singer, was critically analyzed. Does this argument balance our concern for animals with human interests? 2. To understand our attitude towards animals, reviews of the Judeo-Christian and philosophical traditions were done in Chapter 2. The different views related to these traditions were also discussed. The Judeo-Christian view is based on the interpretation of Genesis and the idea of human dominion. Philosophical views on the moral status of animals and moral consideration of animals can be classified in three categories namely indirect theories, direct-but-unequal theories and equal moral status theories. 3. The nature and extent of the current beef production debate was discussed in Chapter 3. The most important issues were the environmental impact of beef production, socio-economic and human health concerns as well as ethical issues related to the inhumane treatment of animals. It was then concluded that most attacks on beef production were biased and did not take context into account. 4. The „Animal Liberation‟ argument was critically analyzed from a logical perspective in Chapter 4, 5 and 6 by using the so called FRISCO approach – with emphasis on the Focus of the argument, Reasons given for the conclusion, the quality of Inferences, the Situation or context of the argument as well as the Clarity of the argument. This argument lacks objectivity and rationality. It includes a number of fallacies, false statements and emotional language. Ideas, concepts and principles were not applied consistently. The argument was therefore found to be unsound. 5. In Chapter 7 the conclusion was stated namely that the “animal liberation” approach could not formulate a sound argument for a vegetarian diet. The „Animal Liberation‟ argument was also unable to balance our concern for animals with human interests, in the process compromising human dignity and freedom. However, human attitudes towards animals and the treatment of animals need to be improved.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: 1. Die doel van die eerste hoofstuk was om ʼn kort inleiding tot die studie te gee. Filosofie is die strewe en soeke na wysheid; om te weet wat ʼn deugsame lewe is, en om te weet wat moreel korrek en aanvaarbaar is. Ons verhouding met diere, ons ingesteldheid teenoor diere, asook die manier hoe ons diere behandel, is slegs enkele van die kwessies wat filosowe dwing om daaroor na te dink. ʼn Belangrike vraag in die verband is die volgende: Is dit moreel aanvaarbaar om vleis te eet, of moet die mens ʼn vegetariese dieet volg? Om hierdie vraag te beantwoord word die “Animal Liberation”-argument, soos aangebied deur Peter Singer, krities ontleed. Is hierdie argument in staat om ons kommer oor die behandeling van diere met menslike belange te balanseer? 2. Om die mens se houding en ingesteldheid teenoor diere beter te verstaan, word ʼn oorsig van die Joods-Christelike en filosofiese tradisies in Hoofstuk 2 gedoen. Die verskillende sienings, wat verband hou met hierdie tradisies, word ook kortliks bespreek. Die Joods-Christelike siening is gebaseer op ʼn spesifieke vertolking van Genesis en die idee van menslike heerskappy. Die filosofiese sienings van die morele status, en gevolglik ook die morele inagneming van diere, kan in drie kategorieë, naamlik indirekte teorieë, direk-maar-ongelyke teorieë en die gelyke-morele-status teorieë, opgedeel word. 3. Die aard en omvang van die beesvleisproduksie-debat word in Hoofstuk 3 bespreek. Die belangrikste kwessies, onderliggend aan hierdie debat, het betrekking op die omgewingsimpak van vleisproduksie, sosio-ekonomiese en menslike gesondheidskwessies, asook etiese kwessies wat verband hou met die onaanvaarbare behandeling van diere. Die gevolgtrekking is dat die meeste aanvalle op vleisproduksie eensydig is en ook nie konteks in ag neem nie. 4. Die “Animal Liberation”-argument word in Hoofstuk 4, 5 en 6 krities ontleed vanuit „n logiese perspektief met behulp van die sogenaamde FRISCO-metode – waarin die klem val op die Fokus van die argument, Redes wat aangevoer word vir die konklusie, die gehalte van die afleidings, die Situasie of konteks van die argument, en die helderheid van die argument. Die gevolgtrekking is dat die argument nie objektief en rasioneel is nie, en gebuk gaan onder denkfoute, vals stellings en emosionele taal. Idees, konsepte en beginsel word ook nie konsekwent toegepas nie. Die argument is dus nie betroubaar nie. 5. In Hoofstuk 7 word die bevinding van die tesis gestel, naamlik dat die “animal liberation” benadering nie „n betroubare argument vir ʼn vegetariese dieet kon formuleer nie. Die argument was ook nie in staat om ons kommer oor diere met menslike belange te balanseer nie, en het in die proses menslike waardigheid en vryheid gekompromitteer. Die mens se houding en behandeling van diere, moet egter verander.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bauer, Caitlin M. "The Inconsistencies of the Replaceability Argument." Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1433172495.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Saraiva, Rutiele Pereira da Silva. "Por uma Ãtica antiespecista: o lugar dos animais nÃo humanos na filosofia moral de Tom Regan." Universidade Federal do CearÃ, 2014. http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=12717.

Full text
Abstract:
CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior
Este trabalho pretende mostrar que o debate sobre os Direitos Animais possui relevÃncia filosÃfica. Ele destaca o fato de que questÃes concernentes aos animais remetem tambÃm ao homem. Trata-se de um esforÃo para mostrar que restringir aos seres humanos a condiÃÃo de detentores de direitos morais consiste num equÃvoco e, portanto, hà a necessidade de uma Ãtica nÃo antropocÃntrica. O foco principal à a contribuiÃÃo de Tom Regan, o autor afirma que por serem sencientes, os animais sÃo sujeitos de uma vida e possuem o que ele chama de valor inerente, ou seja, suas vidas tÃm um valor e fim em si. Tais afirmaÃÃes sÃo fundamentadas em pesquisas cientÃficas sobre a consciÃncia animal e estudos de etologia. à tambÃm objeto desta investigaÃÃo a abordagem de Peter Singer, que defende o Bem-estarismo animal tendo a senciÃncia como um princÃpio moral. Ressaltamos ainda que, uma vez que a expressÃo âdireitos dos animaisâ comumente se refere à concessÃo de respeito pelos seres humanos aos animais a partir de determinados critÃrios sem que lhes caibam direitos especÃficos, a noÃÃo de âdireitos animaisâ parte do pressuposto de que possuem direitos e que devemos reconhecÃ-los a despeito de nossa vontade; tentaremos corroborar a segunda tese.
This work is intended to show that the debate concerning animal rights is philosophically relevant. It points out the fact that animal issues are related to human beings as well. Therefore, this dissertation is an effort to demonstrate that it is wrong to attribute only to human beings the status of holders of moral rights and that it is necessary to conceive an ethical framework grounded on a non-anthropocentric view. Particular attention is devoted here to the contribution of Tom Reagan who asserts animals are subjects of life and possess what is called inherent value, i.e., animalsâ lives are not means to accomplish ends external to themselves. These affirmations are grounded on scientific studies of animal consciousness and on ethology. Peter Singerâs defense of the well-being of animals based on the fact that they are sentient beings will be also investigated. The expression rights of animals is not used in the context of this demarche because it relates to the respect humans beings should have to non-human animals without the recognition of them as holders of specific moral rights. The expression animal rights is purported to corroborate the notion that such rights are a reality to be accepted regardless the will of human beings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McGowan, Wayne S. "Thinking about the responsible parent : freedom and educating the child in Western Australia." University of Western Australia. Graduate School of Education, 2004. http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2005.0014.

Full text
Abstract:
This study is concerned with how educational legislation shapes and uses freedom for the purpose of governing the parent. The key question guiding the study was: How does the Act constitute the ‘parent’ as a subject position responsible for schooling the child? Central to the work is an examination of the School Education Act 1999 (the Act) using Foucault’s thinking on governmentality. This is prefaced by historical accounts that bring together freedom and childhood as contrived styles of conduct that provide the governmental logic behind the Act. The study reveals how the Act shapes and uses the truth of freedom/childhood to construct the responsible parent as a style of conduct pegged to a neo-liberal political rationality of government. It is this political rationality that provides the node or point of encounter between the technologies of power and the self within the Act which forms the ‘responsible’ identity of the parent as an active self-governing entrepreneur made more visible by the political construction of ‘others.’ This is a legal-political subjectivity centred on the truth of freedom/childhood and a neo-liberal rationality of government that believes that any change to our current ethical way of being in relation to educating the child would ruin the very freedoms upon which our civilised lifestyle depends. In essence, the Act relies on the production of ‘others’ as the poor, Aboriginal and radical who must be regulated and made autonomous to constitute the ‘parent’ as an active consumer whose autonomous educational choices are an expression of responsibility in relation to schooling the child
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

van, Popering Ruben. "Jain Vegetarian Laws in the City of Palitana : Indefensible Legal Enforcement or Praiseworthy Progressive Moralism?" Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Centrum för tillämpad etik, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-119663.

Full text
Abstract:
The city of Palitana, India, has become the first region known to legally install de facto meat bans, essentially making Palitana a vegetarian city by law. These legal steps seem to be the direct result of social pressure put on local legislators in the form of a mass hunger strike performed by local Jain monks. This thesis is aimed at discussing the background of this case, its connections to a broader general discussion of moral and ethical vegetarianism, and arguments in favor of and against the legal installment of a meat ban in the Palitana case. It is concluded that although the meat ban is ideologically and theoretically speaking ethically justifiable and defensible it is in practice, at least in its current form, not ethically desirable.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia"

1

Animal rights. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Cao, Deborah. Animal law in Australia. Pyrmont, NSW: Lawbook Co., 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

University of Toronto. Faculty of Law, ed. Animal rights: History, philosophy & jurisprudence. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Animal rights and moral philosophy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lavi, Shai Joshua. Animal rights: History, philosophy & jurisprudence. [Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Animal minds, animal souls, animal rights. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Rowlands, Mark. Animal rights: A philosophical defence. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Katrina, Sharman, and White Steven William 1968-, eds. Animal law in Australia and New Zealand. Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bruce, Alex. Animal law in Australia: An integrated approach. Chatswood, N.S.W: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Animal law in Australia: An integrated approach. Chatswood, N.S.W: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia"

1

Stucki, Saskia, and Visa Kurki. "Animal Rights." In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 1–7. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_407-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Smulewicz-Zucker, Gregory. "Bringing the State into Animal Rights Politics." In Philosophy and the Politics of Animal Liberation, 239–72. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52120-0_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Metz, Thaddeus. "How to Ground Animal Rights on African Values: A Constructive Approach." In Method, Substance, and the Future of African Philosophy, 275–90. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70226-1_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Steiner, Gary, and Marc Lucht. "Law and Nature: Human, Non-human, and Ecosystem Rights." In Speciesism in Biology and Culture, 127–53. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99031-2_7.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe major exponents of the Western philosophical tradition have long maintained a conception of rights according to which only human beings can be possessors of rights. On this view, it makes little or no sense to attribute rights to sentient non-human beings, and it makes no sense whatsoever to attribute rights to non-sentient nature. A reflection on the basic commitments motivating this conception of rights reveals that it is based not on robust rational considerations but rather on the unargued anthropocentric prejudice that specifically human forms of rationality are required for full moral status. The tradition's focus on logos leads many exponents of the tradition to exclude non-human animals from the sphere of justice altogether. Recent work in philosophy and ethology, however, has shed light on the intelligence and emotional lives of many non-human animals, and has made it necessary to rethink the moral status of non-human animals. Even more radically, environmental philosophers argue that rejecting anthropocentrism opens the door to the recognition that some even non-sentient and non-living natural phenomena deserve moral consideration and bear rights that ought to be respected. The substantial conceptual differences between ecocentrism and the animal rights approach focus attention on fundamental questions about the very conditions for moral worth and highlight our need for a more satisfactory theory of the world and the proper place of humanity within it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rochelle, Gerald. "Animal Rights." In Doing Philosophy, 183–95. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003049692-20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Oduwole, Ebunoluwa Olufemi, and Ademola Kazeem Fayemi. "Animal rights vs. animal care ethics." In African Philosophy and Environmental Conservation, 70–82. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315099491-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"Appendix 1. Animal Consciousness." In Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy, 115–24. Columbia University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.7312/fran13422-008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

"2 Regan on Animal Rights." In Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy, 13–30. Columbia University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.7312/fran13422-003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"3 Animal Rights and Kant." In Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy, 31–52. Columbia University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.7312/fran13422-004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"5 Animal Rights and Compassion." In Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy, 77–88. Columbia University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.7312/fran13422-006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Animal rights – Philosophy – Australia' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography