Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Animal Production / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Animal Production.

Journal articles on the topic 'Animal Production'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 August 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Animal Production.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Orihuela, A. "Animal welfare and sustainable animal production." Advances in Animal Biosciences 7, no. 2 (October 2016): 215–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2040470016000157.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper describes the basic principles of animal behavior and how these concepts can be applied to the management and care of farm animal species in a sustainable way. Several examples about how the behavior of animals can be used to increase production and welfare understanding animal needs while solving farm problems, are mentioned. Topics covered include: fostering of orphans, explaining how to substitute dead lambs, or how to add extra lambs to ewes with single births; the breakdown of the cow–calf relationship, covering different forms of weaning, focusing on stress reduction as reproductive efficiency and productivity increases; handling system designs, explaining the basic principles of animal handling and how to leverage this knowledge in the design of facilities for the purpose of moving cattle efficiently, reducing at the same time the risk of injury in humans and animals; the behavior of sick animals, where the physiological processes in order to regain homeostasis through changes in animal behavior are explained, in addition to how those changes in behavior can be used to predict some diseases even before clinical signs appeared, or how these changes might be applied to assess the extent of the pain suffered by a particular individual; and finally, a miscellaneous section covering various behavioral aspects of management of productive animals.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

MAEDA, Kei-ichiro. "Animal Production and Animal Science." TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES 18, no. 4 (2013): 4_56–4_57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5363/tits.18.4_56.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Cabrera de Gómez, Azucena. "ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABLE." Compendio de Ciencias Veterinarias 6, no. 1 (November 3, 2016): 5–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.18004/compend.cienc.vet.2016.06.01.5-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Sanusi, K. A. O. "Improvement in Animal Production: Animal Health." Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 2, no. 1 (January 8, 2021): 44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.51791/njap.v2i1.2322.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Robl, J. M., Z. Wang, P. Kasinathan, and Y. Kuroiwa. "Transgenic animal production and animal biotechnology." Theriogenology 67, no. 1 (January 2007): 127–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.034.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Herbut, Eugeniusz. "Modern Animal Production and Animal Welfare." Agricultural Engineering 22, no. 3 (September 1, 2018): 5–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/agriceng-2018-0021.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe aim of the paper is to discuss the links between modern livestock production, including its techniques and concentration, with animal welfare requirements. Modern livestock production is related to modern facilities, precise livestock production, as well as intensive and high stocking density. At the same time, it requires providing the animals with minimal living conditions, i.e. the welfare set out in the relevant regulations. This in turn should guarantee a good quality of raw livestock materials and products.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Acharya, Rutu Y., Paul H. Hemsworth, Grahame J. Coleman, and James E. Kinder. "The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare." Animals 12, no. 4 (February 16, 2022): 487. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12040487.

Full text

Abstract:

A negative human-animal relationship (HAR) from the perspective of the animal is a limiting factor affecting farm animal welfare, as well as farm animal productivity. Research in farm animals has elucidated sequential relationships between stockperson attitudes, stockperson behaviour, farm animal fear behaviour, farm animal stress physiology, and farm animal productivity. In situations where stockperson attitudes to and interactions with farm animals are sub-optimal, through animal fear and stress, both animal welfare and productivity, including reproductive performance, can be compromised. There is a growing body of evidence that farm animals often seek and enjoy interacting with humans, but our understanding of the effects of a positive HAR on stress resilience and productivity in farm animals is limited. In this review, we explore the pathways by which stress induced by human-animal interactions can negatively affect farm animal reproduction, in particular, via inhibitory effects on the secretion of gonadotrophins. We also review the current knowledge of the stockperson characteristics and the nature of stockperson interactions that affect fear and physiological stress in farm animals. The contents of this review provide an insight into the importance of the HAR on farm animal welfare and reproduction while highlighting the gap in knowledge regarding the effects of a positive HAR on farm animals.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Tribe, Derek E. "Animal Husbandry, Animal Production and Animal Science in Asia." Outlook on Agriculture 22, no. 1 (March 1993): 7–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003072709302200103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Rollin, Bernard E. "ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND THE NEW SOCIAL ETHIC FOR ANIMALS." Journal of Social Philosophy 25, s1 (June 1994): 71–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.1994.tb00349.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

SATO, Eimei. "Cloning of Domestic Animals and Biotechnology in Animal Production." Journal of the agricultural chemical society of Japan 72, no. 8 (1998): 949–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.72.949.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Jawhar safi, Sher Ali, Mehmet Akif ÇAM, Emal Habibi, and Ömer Faruk YILMAZ. "Effects of Climate Change on Animal Production." Journal of Natural Science Review 2, no. 2 (June 29, 2024): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v2i2.30.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper examines the impact of global warming on animal production worldwide. The accumulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere is causing changes in extreme weather patterns and consequent climate variations, substantially affecting crop and animal production. Climate change is altering the meadows and pastures that serve as the primary feed sources for animal husbandry, leading to production losses and threatening the sustainability of this sector. A holistic approach is proposed to mitigate the adverse effects of heat stress on animal production. This involves identifying gene regions resistant to heat stress through breeding studies, improving the physical environment by modifying diets, and enhancing the genetic resilience of animals to climate change. Understanding the adaptation mechanisms of these genes will be crucial for future selection programs, enabling breeding animals better suited to the emerging environments resulting from climate change. Selection and breeding of climate-tolerant animals that can survive and reproduce under extreme conditions will ensure their contribution to future generations. Furthermore, responsible practices throughout the production and consumption chain are necessary to preserve a habitable environment for upcoming generations. The solution lies in a multi-pronged strategy that combines genetic research, environmental improvements, responsible practices, and sustainable animal husbandry to combat the challenges posed by global warming and ensure the long-term viability of animal production.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Chwalibog, Andre. "Energetics of Animal Production." Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 41, no. 2 (January 1991): 147–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00015129109438596.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Waran, N. K. "Production and Animal Welfare." Outlook on Agriculture 24, no. 1 (March 1995): 11–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003072709502400104.

Full text

Abstract:

Animal welfare is a controversial issue. Whilst producers try to meet consumer needs for cheaper animal products, the welfare of our livestock is threatened. But what do we mean by animal welfare, and how can we judge when an animal's welfare is compromised? Various methods have been devised, but more rigorous definitions are needed if welfare legislation is to rest on firm scientific foundations rather than anecdotal evidence and public pressure.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Ponce de León, F. Abel, and Gustavo A. Gutierrez. "Genomics and animal production." Revista Peruana de Biología 27, no. 1 (March 4, 2020): 015–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rpb.v27i1.17574.

Full text

Abstract:

Developing countries have the challenge of achieving food security in a world context that is affected by climate change and global population growth. Molecular Genetics and genomics are proposed as technologies that will help to achieve sustainable food security. Technologies that have been developed in the last decade such as the development of genetic markers, genetic maps, genomic selection, next-generation sequencing, and DNA editing systems are discussed. Examples of some discoveries and achievements are provided.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Tillett, R. D., A. R. Frost, and S. K. Welch. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Biosystems Engineering 81, no. 4 (April 2002): 453–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2001.0018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Narushin, V. G., M. N. Romanov, and V. P. Bogatyr. "AP–Animal Production Technology." Biosystems Engineering 83, no. 3 (November 2002): 373–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0122.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

McGovern, R. E., and J. M. Bruce. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 77, no. 1 (September 2000): 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0560.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Halachmi, I. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 77, no. 1 (September 2000): 67–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0563.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Kettlewell, P. J., R. P. Hoxey, C. J. Hampson, N. R. Green, B. M. Veale, and M. A. Mitchell. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 79, no. 4 (August 2001): 429–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2001.0713.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Chedad, A., D. Moshou, J. M. Aerts, A. Van Hirtum, H. Ramon, and D. Berckmans. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 79, no. 4 (August 2001): 449–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2001.0719.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Narushin, V. G. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 79, no. 4 (August 2001): 441–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2001.0721.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Zhu, Jun. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 80, no. 3 (November 2001): 307–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2001.0736.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Tierney, G., and R. D. Thomson. "AP—Animal Production Technology." Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 80, no. 4 (December 2001): 373–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2001.0749.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Kołoszko-Chomentowska, Zofia. "ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS WITHOUT ANIMAL PRODUCTION." Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists XIX, no. 4 (October 10, 2017): 124–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.5175.

Full text

Abstract:

This article undertakes to evaluate the economic and environmental sustainability of agricultural holdings not engaged in animal production. Studies covered agricultural holdings in the Podlaskie voivodeship included in the FADN system in 2014. The evaluation accounts for selected agri-ecological indicators, supplemented by material pressure indexes and economic indexes (profitability of land and labour). Obtained results indicate that environmental sustainability conditions were met only with regard to the vegetation cover index but were not met with regard to the remaining indexes (share of permanent grasslands, crop structure, balance of organic substances). Holdings without animals exerted lesser pressure on the environment than holdings engaged in animal production from the perspective of consumption of means of production. Both groups of holdings did not achieve economic sustainability. Income parity in 2014 amounted to 0.73 for holdings without animals and 0.84 for holdings with animal productions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Gremmen, Bart. "Ethics views on animal science and animal production." Animal Frontiers 10, no. 1 (January 2020): 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz049.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Adams, Clifford A. "Nutrition-based health in animal production." Nutrition Research Reviews 19, no. 1 (June 2006): 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/nrr2005115.

Full text

Abstract:

Events such as BSE, foot and mouth disease and avian influenza illustrate the importance of animal health on a global basis. The only practical solution to deal with such problems has usually been mass culling of millions of animals at great effort and expense. Serious consideration needs to be given to nutrition as a practical solution for health maintenance and disease avoidance of animals raised for food. Health or disease derives from a triad of interacting factors; diet–disease agent, diet–host and disease agent–host. Various nutrients and other bioactive feed ingredients, nutricines, directly influence health by inhibiting growth of pathogens or by modulating pathogen virulence. It is possible to transform plant-based feed ingredients to produce vaccines against important diseases and these could be fed directly to animals. Nutrients and nutricines contribute to three major factors important in the diet–host interaction; maintenance of gastrointestinal integrity, support of the immune system and the modulation of oxidative stress. Nutrition-based health is the next challenge in modern animal production and will be important to maintain economic viability and also to satisfy consumer demands in terms of food quality, safety and price. This must be accomplished largely through nutritional strategies making optimum use of both nutrients and nutricines.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Hampton, Jordan O., Timothy H. Hyndman, Benjamin L. Allen, and Bob Fischer. "Animal Harms and Food Production: Informing Ethical Choices." Animals 11, no. 5 (April 23, 2021): 1225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051225.

Full text

Abstract:

Ethical food choices have become an important societal theme in post-industrial countries. Many consumers are particularly interested in the animal welfare implications of the various foods they may choose to consume. However, concepts in animal welfare are rapidly evolving towards consideration of all animals (including wildlife) in contemporary approaches such as “One Welfare”. This approach requires recognition that negative impacts (harms) may be intentional and obvious (e.g., slaughter of livestock) but also include the under-appreciated indirect or unintentional harms that often impact wildlife (e.g., land clearing). This is especially true in the Anthropocene, where impacts on non-human life are almost ubiquitous across all human activities. We applied the “harms” model of animal welfare assessment to several common food production systems and provide a framework for assessing the breadth (not intensity) of harms imposed. We considered all harms caused to wild as well as domestic animals, both direct effects and indirect effects. We described 21 forms of harm and considered how they applied to 16 forms of food production. Our analysis suggests that all food production systems harm animals to some degree and that the majority of these harms affect wildlife, not livestock. We conclude that the food production systems likely to impose the greatest overall breadth of harms to animals are intensive animal agriculture industries (e.g., dairy) that rely on a secondary food production system (e.g., cropping), while harvesting of locally available wild plants, mushrooms or seaweed is likely to impose the least harms. We present this conceptual analysis as a resource for those who want to begin considering the complex animal welfare trade-offs involved in their food choices.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Leeflang, P. "Trypanosomiasis And Animal Production In Nigeria." Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 2, no. 1 (January 8, 2021): 27–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.51791/njap.v2i1.2319.

Full text

Abstract:

TRYPANOSOMIASIS is one of the principal factors restricting growth of the livestock industry in Nigeria and, therefore, is a direct concern of animal scientists who aspire to increase the production of animal protein in this country. The present paper reviews the value of drug treatment of disease animals, destruction of game, clearing of vegetation, and the extermination of the tse-tse flies by insecticides as methods of controlling this disease; it also discusses the contribution of integrated land use, improved standards of nutrition and management, and trypanosome-tolerant cattle to minimize, for the present, the effect of trypanosomiasis on the development of the livestock industry.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Baumberger, Cecilia, Francisca Di Pillo, Pablo Galdames, Cristobal Oyarzun, Victor Marambio, Pedro Jimenez-Bluhm, and Christopher Hamilton-West. "Swine Backyard Production Systems in Central Chile: Characterizing Farm Structure, Animal Management, and Production Value Chain." Animals 13, no. 12 (June 15, 2023): 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13122000.

Full text

Abstract:

Backyard production systems (BPS) are highly distributed in central Chile. While poultry BPS have been extensively characterized, there remains a notable gap in the characterization of swine BPS in central Chile. In addition, there is evidence that zoonotic pathogens, such as influenza A virus and Salmonella spp., are circulating in backyard poultry and pigs. A total of 358 BPS located in central Chile were evaluated between 2013 and 2015 by interviewing farm owners. Severe deficiencies in biosecurity measures were observed. The value chain of swine backyard production identified food, veterinary care (visits and products), and replacement or breeding animals as the primary inputs to the backyard. The most common origin of swine replacements was from outside the BPS (63%). The main outputs of the system were identified as meat and live animals, including piglets and breeding animals. In 16% of BPS, breeding animals were lent to other BPS, indicating the existence of animals and animal product movement in and out of backyard farms. Results from this study indicate that swine BPS in central Chile represents an animal–human interface that demands special attention for implementing targeted preventive measures to prevent the introduction and spread of animal pathogens and the emergence of zoonotic pathogens.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Manuja, Anju, Balvinder Kumar, and Raj Kumar Singh. "Nanotechnology developments: opportunities for animal health and production." Nanotechnology Development 2, no. 1 (January 30, 2012): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/nd.2012.e4.

Full text

Abstract:

Nanotechnology has opened up new vistas for applications in molecular biology, biotechnology and almost all the disciplines of veterinary and animal sciences. Excellence in animal health and production can be achieved by translation of this newer technology to create effective services and products for animals. The ability to manufacture and manipulate matter on the nanoscale has offered opportunities for application in diverse areas of animal sciences. Nanosensors, nanovaccines, adjuvants, gene delivery and smart drug delivery methods have the potential to revolutionize animal health and production. There can be numerous applications of the nanomaterials for disease diagnosis, treatment, drug delivery, animal nutrition, animal breeding, reproduction, tissue engineering and value addition to animal products. This paper reviews the recent developments in nanotechnology research and opportunities for application in animal sciences.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Birke, Lynda. "Animal Bodies in the Production of Scientific Knowledge: Modelling Medicine." Body & Society 18, no. 3-4 (August 30, 2012): 156–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357034x12446379.

Full text

Abstract:

What role do nonhuman animals play in the construction of medical knowledge? Animal researchers typically claim that their use has been essential to progress – but just how have animals fitted into the development of biomedicine? In this article, I trace how nonhuman animals, and their body parts, have become incorporated into laboratory processes and places. They have long been designed to fit into scientific procedures – now increasingly so through genetic design. Animals and procedures are closely connected – animals in science are disassembled and reassembled in various ways. Indeed, biomedical knowledge can be said to rest on a large pile of animal bodies and body parts. The process of producing animal body parts to order has implications for how we conceptualize the body (human or nonhuman), which I discuss in the final section.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Puvača, Nikola, Dragana Ljubojević Pelić, and Vincenzo Tufarelli. "Mycotoxins Adsorbents in Food Animal Production." Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management (JATEM) 6, no. 5 (October 18, 2023): 944–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.55817/gyic7602.

Full text

Abstract:

Mycotoxins, toxic secondary metabolites produced by molds, pose a significant threat to food animal production, as they can lead to adverse health effects, reduced productivity, and economic losses. In response to this challenge, mycotoxin adsorbents have emerged as a promising solution to mitigate the harmful effects of mycotoxins in livestock. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the positive influence of mycotoxin adsorbents in food animal production. The review discusses the mechanisms by which mycotoxin adsorbents function, including adsorption, binding, and inactivation of mycotoxins. Various types of mycotoxin adsorbents are explored, encompassing natural adsorbents such as clays, zeolites, and activated carbons, as well as synthetic polymers. The influence of mycotoxin adsorbents on the immune system, gut health, and overall well-being of food animals is examined. Furthermore, the review delves into the challenges and limitations associated with mycotoxin adsorbents, including variability in mycotoxin contamination, dosage, and timing of administration. Strategies for optimizing their use, such as mycotoxin monitoring and mycotoxin binder selection, are discussed to ensure maximum effectiveness. In conclusion, the positive influence of mycotoxin adsorbents in food animal production cannot be understated. By offering a proactive and cost-effective means of mycotoxin management, mycotoxin adsorbents play a pivotal role in safeguarding animal health and the economic viability of livestock operations. This review underscores the significance of mycotoxin adsorbents as essential tools in ensuring the safety and productivity of food animal production systems.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Wójcik, Wojciech, Paweł Solarczyk, Monika Łukasiewicz, Kamila Puppel, and Beata Kuczyńska. "Trends in animal production from organic farming [review]." Acta Innovations, no. 28 (July 1, 2018): 32–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.32933/actainnovations.28.4.

Full text

Abstract:

Organic farming is an alternative method for dynamic agricultural system. Products that are obtained from organic farming are referred to as ecological or organic food [1]. These include products of animal origin that come from organic farming [2]. In the case of animal production in organic farming there are particular requirements for breed, animal welfare and feeding. Additionally, the origins of animals is also of crucial importance since, basically, such animals should be purchased from organic farms. However, there can be exceptions to this requirement, for instance, if the number of animals of a particular species or of a specific breed is not sufficient [3]. The main idea behind organic production is obtaining plant or animal products maintaining good soil structure, clean water and adjusting to the natural rhythm of nature. Enhancement of the social status has led to the situation where consumers pay more attention to the quality and origins of the products they choose. Numerous scientific papers from recent years, based on consumer’s opinion, show substantial impact of welfare system on the quality of animal products. Since ‘90s there has been a systematic surge of interest in products from ecological systems and demand for these, which in turn affect the development of this agricultural sector. The aim of the work is to compare the changes in organic production over the last 26 years in Poland with reference to the situation in Europe and whole globe. The research has been done on the basis of statistics since 1990 up till now as well as on scientific studies. Nowadays, there are increasing numbers of farms and redirections of production, as well as changes in the sizes of farms producing organic food.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Chambers, John, and Mike Brade. "Legislation Affecting Animal Production Systems." Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 2009, no. 1 (July 15, 2010): 135–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5661/recadv-09-135.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

SUBASINGHE, R. P., J. DELAMARE-DEBOUTTEVILLE, C. V. MOHAN, and M. J. PHILLIPS. "Vulnerabilities in aquatic animal production." Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE 38, no. 2 (September 1, 2019): 423–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.2.2996.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

SHELTON, J. N. "Reproductive technology in animal production." Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE 9, no. 3 (September 1, 1990): 825–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.9.3.521.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Rossing, W. "SENSOR DEVELOPMENTS IN ANIMAL PRODUCTION." Acta Horticulturae, no. 304 (March 1992): 55–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1992.304.5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Van Kempen, Theo. "Infrared technology in animal production." World's Poultry Science Journal 57, no. 1 (March 1, 2001): 29–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/wps20010004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Reynnells, R. D. "Bioethical Considerations in Animal Production." Poultry Science 83, no. 3 (March 2004): 303–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.3.303.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Spedding, C. R. W. "Sustainability in animal production systems." Animal Science 61, no. 1 (August 1995): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s135772980001345x.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract‘Sustainability” has been defined in so many different ways that it no longer has an accepted (or acceptable) meaning. Nevertheless, it is being used as a label to confer respectability on corporate plans and research proposals, practical projects, attitudes and intellectual positions. The weaknesses of current definitions are examined with a view to clarifying the physical, biological and socio-economic objectives, covered by the term ‘sustainable’.Since it is no longer feasible to abandon the term or to restrict its scope, it is worth considering what useful meaning can be attached to the concept. An attempt is made to spell out the tvays in which it could sensibly be used in relation to animal production systems. It is suggested that this would have to take the form of a package of expressions covering the essential attributes offuture animal production systems.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Clark, A. J. "Gene transfer in animal production." BSAP Occasional Publication 12 (1988): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0263967x00003256.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACTGene transfer by pronuclear injection has been accomplished in farm animals by a number of research groups. Applications of this technology for improving milk composition, producing pharmaceutical proteins and manipulating physiology are described. Recent developments in our understanding of gene expression at the molecular level will increase the precision with which genetic changes can be made by gene transfer.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Boysan, Füsun, Çiğdem Özer, Kağan Bakkaloğlu, and Mustafa Tekin Börekçi. "Biogas Production from Animal Manure." Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 15 (2015): 908–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2015.08.144.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Houdebine, Louis-Marie. "Transgenesis to improve animal production." Livestock Production Science 74, no. 3 (April 2002): 255–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0301-6226(02)00018-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Topps, J. "Animal production and environmental health." Biological Wastes 25, no. 2 (January 1988): 155–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(88)90106-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Quirke, J. F. "Immunophysiological regulation of animal production." Livestock Production Science 13, no. 1 (July 1985): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(85)90074-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Gall, C. F. "Dictionary of animal production terminology." Livestock Production Science 15, no. 2 (August 1986): 201–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(86)90028-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

ONODERA, KAZUKIYO. "Substance production by animal cells." Kagaku To Seibutsu 24, no. 2 (1986): 112–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/kagakutoseibutsu1962.24.112.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Fonnesbeck, P. V. "Dictionary of animal production terminology." Animal Feed Science and Technology 17, no. 3 (May 1987): 225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(87)90006-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Evans, F. D., and A. T. Critchley. "Seaweeds for animal production use." Journal of Applied Phycology 26, no. 2 (October 10, 2013): 891–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0162-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Mohammed, Asledin. "Review on the Cascading Effects of Climate Change on Expansion of Livestock Disease Livestock Production and Mitigation." Public Health Open Access 8, no. 1 (2024): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.23880/phoa-16000278.

Full text

Abstract:

Climate change are significantly vulnerable to the impact on Animal Health and Production with direct and indirect impacts on emerging and re-emerging animal diseases and zoo noses since it disrupts natural ecosystems and allows - causing pathogens to move into new areas where they may harm wild life and domestic species, as well as humans. Climate change affects diseases and pest distributions, range prevalence, incidence and seasonality but the degree of change s highly uncertain. The occurrence and distribution of vector borne diseases such as bluetongue, west nile fever, rift fever, African horse sickness, etc. are closely associated with weather patterns and long-term climatic factors strongly ce the incidence of outbreaks. The interaction between animal production and climate change is complex and multi-nal since animal production contributes to climate change; but to the reverse and worse condition climate highly affects animal production. Climate change, animal production systems and animal diseases are strongly linked there. But what is worse is that both change in climate and the production systems of animals highly affect the ence, distribution, emergence and re-emergence of animal diseases. The close linkage among climate change, animal tion and disease; the increased threat of climate on the animal production and health sector’s needs: the hands of lders in the environment, animal production and health to work in an integrated and systematic manner; researches nphasis given to the state of climate change and the direct and indirect effects it pose on animal production and health; Suring development of sustainable animal farming and land use, and climate adaptation and mitigation strategies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!