Relevant bibliographies by topics / Animal communication / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Animal communication.

Journal articles on the topic 'Animal communication'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Animal communication.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

WAAL, FRANS B. M. "Animal Communication." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1000, no. 1 (January 24, 2006): 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1280.006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kaplan, Gisela. "Animal communication." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5, no. 6 (October 8, 2014): 661–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1321.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

AHMED, Khalid Ahmed Hassan. "INTERSECTIONAL PERSPECTIVES OF HUMAN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION." International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research 03, no. 03 (June 1, 2021): 80–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.3-3.9.

Full text
Abstract:
This study aims at reviewing a bulk of related studies, and some verses from the Holly Qur'an in order to discover some mysteries of human animal communication. We believe that the majority of the previous studies concern themselves with human attempts to teach human speech to animals. There are a lot of mysteries that surround human animal communication. Furthermore, there are some intersections between human and animals’ ways of interaction. We believe that human speech is one of the most amazing human properties; at the same time, we believe that animals have very advanced ways of communication. However, humans and animals have the access to be involved in interaction and communications with each other and with other species of animals. Our mere observations could maintain this hypothesis of joined human animal communications. This study is an attempt to establish a theoretical framework on which humans and animals can interact and communicate jointly among themselves and other types of animals as well. To process the study some of the related studies will be outlined, discussed and analyzed, and then they will be correlated with the findings of the selected Holly Qur’an verses. Out of these studies some assumptions will be outlined in order to be treated through the discussion, results and recommendations for further studies..
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Reed, Lauren P. "Animal Communication Networks." Condor 108, no. 2 (2006): 485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[485:acn]2.0.co;2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kulick, Don. "Human–Animal Communication." Annual Review of Anthropology 46, no. 1 (October 23, 2017): 357–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041723.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Reed, Lauren P. "Animal Communication Networks." Condor 108, no. 2 (May 1, 2006): 485–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/condor/108.2.485.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Holopainen, Jarmo K. "Plant–animal communication." Annals of Botany 111, no. 2 (December 12, 2012): vii. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs273.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

SIMON, M. "Animal communication: Do animals mean what they say?" Journal of Social and Biological Systems 9, no. 4 (October 1986): 365–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-1750(86)90242-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Chen, Yihua. "Comparison Between Animal Communication and Language." Communications in Humanities Research 12, no. 1 (November 20, 2023): 68–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/12/20230045.

Full text
Abstract:
Language is a structured system that consists of grammar and vocabulary. Although animals communicate with each other, it has remained unsettled that whether animals use language. As Pearce concluded four main elements of language (arbitrariness of units, semanticity, displacement and productivity), this paper aims to evaluate animal communication according to these criteria and figure out their ability to learn language by studying the experiments conducted by scientists before. As a result, this paper found that animal communication met the criterion of semanticity, but failed to meet other criteria, especially the criterion of displacement and productivity, and it is very hard to teach them language. It is argued that they showed no evidence of using language even after they were taught some elements of it. The conclusion indicated that animals do not have language considering the evidence drawn from the studies before. However, it is also suggested that further studies are needed to find a better way to study animal communication and more suitable criteria for them. Signs also showed that animals may develop language referring to these criteria in the future.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ravignani, Andrea, and Koen de Reus. "Modelling Animal Interactive Rhythms in Communication." Evolutionary Bioinformatics 15 (January 2019): 117693431882355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1176934318823558.

Full text
Abstract:
Time is one crucial dimension conveying information in animal communication. Evolution has shaped animals’ nervous systems to produce signals with temporal properties fitting their socio-ecological niches. Many quantitative models of mechanisms underlying rhythmic behaviour exist, spanning insects, crustaceans, birds, amphibians, and mammals. However, these computational and mathematical models are often presented in isolation. Here, we provide an overview of the main mathematical models employed in the study of animal rhythmic communication among conspecifics. After presenting basic definitions and mathematical formalisms, we discuss each individual model. These computational models are then compared using simulated data to uncover similarities and key differences in the underlying mechanisms found across species. Our review of the empirical literature is admittedly limited. We stress the need of using comparative computer simulations – both before and after animal experiments – to better understand animal timing in interaction. We hope this article will serve as a potential first step towards a common computational framework to describe temporal interactions in animals, including humans.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Schutten, Julie Kalil. "Perspectives on human-animal communication: internatural communication." Environmental Communication 9, no. 1 (January 2, 2015): 137–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.1002242.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Ryan, Michael J., and Marc D. Hauser. "Animal Communication and Evolution." Evolution 51, no. 4 (August 1997): 1333. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2411064.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Goodman, Robert S. "Animal Communication Treasure Hunt." American Biology Teacher 58, no. 4 (April 1, 1996): 224–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4450129.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Garstang, Michael. "Animal communication in context." Physics Today 73, no. 8 (August 1, 2020): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.4534.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Peppin, Richard J. "Animal communication in context." Physics Today 73, no. 8 (August 1, 2020): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.4535.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Laidre, Mark E. "Principles of Animal Communication." Animal Behaviour 83, no. 3 (March 2012): 865–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.014.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Symes, Laurel B., and Trevor D. Price. "Animal communication and noise." Animal Behaviour 108 (October 2015): 43–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Newton, R. P. "Communication within animal cells." FEBS Letters 310, no. 1 (September 21, 1992): 93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(92)81161-e.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Flack, Jessica C. "Animal Communication: Hidden Complexity." Current Biology 23, no. 21 (November 2013): R967—R969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Hanley, Michael R. "Communication within animal cells." Trends in Cell Biology 2, no. 11 (November 1992): 349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0962-8924(92)90185-p.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Ryan, Michael J. "ANIMAL COMMUNICATION AND EVOLUTION." Evolution 51, no. 4 (August 1997): 1333–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03982.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Howard, Ralph. "Principles of Animal Communication." American Entomologist 45, no. 2 (1999): 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ae/45.2.126.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Brumm, Henrik, and Peter Slater. "Animal Communication: Timing Counts." Current Biology 17, no. 13 (July 2007): R521—R523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.053.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Zuberbühler, Klaus. "Syntax and compositionality in animal communication." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375, no. 1789 (November 18, 2019): 20190062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0062.

Full text
Abstract:
Syntax has been found in animal communication but only humans appear to have generative, hierarchically structured syntax. How did syntax evolve? I discuss three theories of evolutionary transition from animal to human syntax: computational capacity, structural flexibility and event perception. The computation hypothesis is supported by artificial grammar experiments consistently showing that only humans can learn linear stimulus sequences with an underlying hierarchical structure, a possible by-product of computationally powerful large brains. The structural flexibility hypothesis is supported by evidence of meaning-bearing combinatorial and permutational signal sequences in animals, with sometimes compositional features, but no evidence for generativity or hierarchical structure. Again, animals may be constrained by computational limits in short-term memory but possibly also by limits in articulatory control and social cognition. The event categorization hypothesis, finally, posits that humans are cognitively predisposed to analyse natural events by assigning agency and assessing how agents impact on patients, a propensity that is reflected by the basic syntactic units in all languages. Whether animals perceive natural events in the same way is largely unknown, although event perception may provide the cognitive grounding for syntax evolution. This article is part of the theme issue ‘What can animal communication teach us about human language?’
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Larom, David, Michael Garstang, Katharine Payne, and Richard Raspet. "Surface meteorology and animal communication." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, no. 5 (November 1997): 3124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.420598.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Naguib, Marc, and J. Jordan Price. "The evolution of animal communication." Behaviour 150, no. 9-10 (2013): 950–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003098.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. "The Design of Animal Communication." Adaptive Behavior 8, no. 1 (January 2000): 75–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105971230000800105.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Radner, Daisie. "DIRECTED ACTION AND ANIMAL COMMUNICATION." Ratio 6, no. 2 (December 1993): 135–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.1993.tb00143.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Mortensen, Chris. "Private states and animal communication." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no. 4 (December 1993): 658–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00032234.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Plous, S. "Animal models of human communication." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no. 4 (December 1993): 660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00032258.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Hauser, Marc D., and Douglas A. Nelson. "‘Intentional’ signaling in Animal communication." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6, no. 6 (June 1991): 186–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90211-f.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Bradbury, Jack W., and Sandra L. Vehrencamp. "Economic models of animal communication." Animal Behaviour 59, no. 2 (February 2000): 259–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1330.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Beckers, Gabriel J. L., and Johan J. Bolhuis. "The Design of Animal Communication." Animal Behaviour 60, no. 5 (November 2000): 703–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1532.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Telkänranta, Helena. "Conditioning or cognition? Understanding interspecific communication as a way of improving animal training (a case study with elephants in Nepal)." Sign Systems Studies 37, no. 3/4 (December 1, 2009): 542–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2009.37.3-4.09.

Full text
Abstract:
When animals are trained to function in a human society (for example, pet dogs, police dogs, or sports horses), different trainers and training cultures vary widely in their ability to understand how the animal perceives the communication efforts of the trainer. This variation has considerable impact on the resulting performance and welfare of the animals. There are many trainers who frequently resort to physical punishment or other pain-inflicting methods when the attempts to communicate have failed or when the trainer is unaware of the full range of the potential forms of human-animal communication. Negative consequences of this include animal suffering, imperfect performance of the animals, and sometimes risks to humans, as repeated pain increases aggression in some animals. The field of animal training is also interesting from a semiotic point of view, as it effectively illustrates the differences between the distinct forms of interaction that are included in the concept of communication in the zoosemiotic discourse. The distinctions with the largest potential in improving human-animal communication in animal training, is understanding the difference between verbal communication of the kind that requires rather high cognitive capabilities of the animal, and communication based on conditioning, which is a form of animal learning that does not require high cognitive ability. The differences and potentials of various types of human-animal communication are discussed in the form of a case study of a novel project run by a NGO called Working Elephant Programme of Asia (WEPA), which introduces humane, science-based training and handling methods as an alternative to the widespread use of pain and fear that is the basis of most existing elephant training methods.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Gingras, Sophie. "Béatrice GALLINON-MÉLÉNEC (dir.), Homme/Animal : Quelles relations ? Quelles communications ?" Communication, Vol. 25/1 (November 15, 2006): 318–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/communication.322.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A. "Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication." Ethology 107, no. 7 (July 24, 2001): 671–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.0686f.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Tierney, David. "“The Poetry of a Dingo’s Bite”." Extrapolation 65, no. 1 (April 14, 2024): 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.3.

Full text
Abstract:
Science fiction has an extensive history of attempting to breach the communication boundary between humans and nonhuman animals by giving nonhuman animals some semblance of human language, with many uplift stories having them speak near-perfect English, their minds being filtered through a human linguistic framework, partly or wholly erasing their voice. Building on the examination of nonhuman animal gestural communication in Brian Massumi’s What Animals Teach Us about Politics (2014), this paper analyses how two works, Ursula K. Le Guin’s “‘The Author of the Acacia Seeds’ and Other Extracts from the Journal of the Association of Therolinguistics” (1974) and Laura Jean McKay’s The Animals in That Country (2020) depict animal behavior in itself as being creative and language-like. Neither story offers a straightforward translation from nonhuman to human, each showing how human linguistic frameworks leave gaps for the untranslatable complexities in nonhuman animal gestures. This I suggest shows that further exploration of nonhuman animal communication in science fiction can allow us to move beyond ideas of human exceptionalism and logocentrism and can turn the hierarchical scale of communication into more of a spectrum with various communication types.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Pouw, Wim, Shannon Proksch, Linda Drijvers, Marco Gamba, Judith Holler, Christopher Kello, Rebecca S. Schaefer, and Geraint A. Wiggins. "Multilevel rhythms in multimodal communication." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376, no. 1835 (August 23, 2021): 20200334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0334.

Full text
Abstract:
It is now widely accepted that the brunt of animal communication is conducted via several modalities, e.g. acoustic and visual, either simultaneously or sequentially. This is a laudable multimodal turn relative to traditional accounts of temporal aspects of animal communication which have focused on a single modality at a time. However, the fields that are currently contributing to the study of multimodal communication are highly varied, and still largely disconnected given their sole focus on a particular level of description or their particular concern with human or non-human animals. Here, we provide an integrative overview of converging findings that show how multimodal processes occurring at neural, bodily, as well as social interactional levels each contribute uniquely to the complex rhythms that characterize communication in human and non-human animals. Though we address findings for each of these levels independently, we conclude that the most important challenge in this field is to identify how processes at these different levels connect. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology’.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Vigors, Belinda. "Citizens’ and Farmers’ Framing of ‘Positive Animal Welfare’ and the Implications for Framing Positive Welfare in Communication." Animals 9, no. 4 (April 4, 2019): 147. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9040147.

Full text
Abstract:
Human perception can depend on how an individual frames information in thought and how information is framed in communication. For example, framing something positively, instead of negatively, can change an individual’s response. This is of relevance to ‘positive animal welfare’, which places greater emphasis on farm animals being provided with opportunities for positive experiences. However, little is known about how this framing of animal welfare may influence the perception of key animal welfare stakeholders. Through a qualitative interview study with farmers and citizens, undertaken in Scotland, UK, this paper explores what positive animal welfare evokes to these key welfare stakeholders and highlights the implications of such internal frames for effectively communicating positive welfare in society. Results indicate that citizens make sense of positive welfare by contrasting positive and negative aspects of welfare, and thus frame it as animals having ‘positive experiences’ or being ‘free from negative experiences’. Farmers draw from their existing frames of animal welfare to frame positive welfare as ‘good husbandry’, ‘proactive welfare improvement’ or the ‘animal’s point of view’. Implications of such internal frames (e.g., the triggering of ‘negative welfare’ associations by the word ‘positive’) for the effective communication of positive welfare are also presented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Brainard, Michael S., and W. Tecumseh Fitch. "Editorial overview: Communication and language: Animal communication and human language." Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28 (October 2014): v—viii. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Hill, Peggy S. M. "Vibration and Animal Communication: A Review1." American Zoologist 41, no. 5 (October 2001): 1135–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1668/0003-1569(2001)041[1135:vaacar]2.0.co;2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Haskell, David G. "ANIMAL VOCAL COMMUNICATION: A NEW APPROACH." Wilson Bulletin 112, no. 2 (June 2000): 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0299:br]2.0.co;2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Awbrey, Frank T. "Modeling noise interference with animal communication." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, no. 3 (September 1993): 1850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.407692.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Hebets, Eileen A., Andrew B. Barron, Christopher N. Balakrishnan, Mark E. Hauber, Paul H. Mason, and Kim L. Hoke. "A systems approach to animal communication." Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, no. 1826 (March 16, 2016): 20152889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2889.

Full text
Abstract:
Why animal communication displays are so complex and how they have evolved are active foci of research with a long and rich history. Progress towards an evolutionary analysis of signal complexity, however, has been constrained by a lack of hypotheses to explain similarities and/or differences in signalling systems across taxa. To address this, we advocate incorporating a systems approach into studies of animal communication—an approach that includes comprehensive experimental designs and data collection in combination with the implementation of systems concepts and tools. A systems approach evaluates overall display architecture, including how components interact to alter function, and how function varies in different states of the system. We provide a brief overview of the current state of the field, including a focus on select studies that highlight the dynamic nature of animal signalling. We then introduce core concepts from systems biology (redundancy, degeneracy, pluripotentiality, and modularity) and discuss their relationships with system properties (e.g. robustness, flexibility, evolvability). We translate systems concepts into an animal communication framework and accentuate their utility through a case study. Finally, we demonstrate how consideration of the system-level organization of animal communication poses new practical research questions that will aid our understanding of how and why animal displays are so complex.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Johnson, Karl F. "Communication Within Animal Cells.Greg J. Barritt." Quarterly Review of Biology 68, no. 4 (December 1993): 580–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/418327.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Ord, Terry J., and Judy A. Stamps. "Species Identity Cues in Animal Communication." American Naturalist 174, no. 4 (October 2009): 585–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605372.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Janik, Vincent M. "Nature and nurture in animal communication." Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, no. 3 (May 9, 2001): 523–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.0288f.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Janik, Vincent M. "Nature and nurture in animal communication." Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, no. 4 (December 20, 2001): 681–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.0311b.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Seyfarth, Robert M., and Dorothy L. Cheney. "Signalers and Receivers in Animal Communication." Annual Review of Psychology 54, no. 1 (February 2003): 145–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145121.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Hill, Peggy S. M. "Vibration and Animal Communication: A Review." American Zoologist 41, no. 5 (October 2001): 1135–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.5.1135.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Animal communication' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography