Academic literature on the topic 'Algorithms- Protein'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Algorithms- Protein.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Algorithms- Protein"
Hulianytskyi, Leonid, and Sergii Chornozhuk. "Genetic Algorithm with New Stochastic Greedy Crossover Operator for Protein Structure Folding Problem." Cybernetics and Computer Technologies, no. 2 (July 24, 2020): 19–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.34229/2707-451x.20.2.3.
Full textCavanaugh, David, and Krishnan Chittur. "A hydrophobic proclivity index for protein alignments." F1000Research 4 (October 21, 2015): 1097. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6348.1.
Full textCavanaugh, David, and Krishnan Chittur. "A hydrophobic proclivity index for protein alignments." F1000Research 4 (October 15, 2020): 1097. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6348.2.
Full textBegleiter, R., R. El-Yaniv, and G. Yona. "On Prediction Using Variable Order Markov Models." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 22 (December 1, 2004): 385–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1613/jair.1491.
Full textMoschopoulos, Charalampos, Grigorios Beligiannis, Spiridon Likothanassis, and Sophia Kossida. "Using a Genetic Algorithm and Markov Clustering on Protein–Protein Interaction Graphs." International Journal of Systems Biology and Biomedical Technologies 1, no. 2 (April 2012): 35–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijsbbt.2012040103.
Full textWang, Derui, and Jingyu Hou. "Explore the hidden treasure in protein–protein interaction networks — An iterative model for predicting protein functions." Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 13, no. 05 (October 2015): 1550026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219720015500262.
Full textDandekar, Thomas, and Patrick Argos. "Potential of genetic algorithms in protein folding and protein engineering simulations." "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection" 5, no. 7 (1992): 637–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/5.7.637.
Full textGainza, Pablo, Hunter M. Nisonoff, and Bruce R. Donald. "Algorithms for protein design." Current Opinion in Structural Biology 39 (August 2016): 16–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2016.03.006.
Full textBrown, Michael Scott, Tommy Bennett, and James A. Coker. "Niche Genetic Algorithms are better than traditional Genetic Algorithms for de novo Protein Folding." F1000Research 3 (October 7, 2014): 236. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5412.1.
Full textKhatami, Mohammad Hassan, Udson C. Mendes, Nathan Wiebe, and Philip M. Kim. "Gate-based quantum computing for protein design." PLOS Computational Biology 19, no. 4 (April 12, 2023): e1011033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011033.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Algorithms- Protein"
Derevyanko, Georgy. "Structure-based algorithms for protein-protein interactions." Thesis, Grenoble, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014GRENY070/document.
Full textThe phenotype of every known living organism is determined mainly by the complicated interactions between the proteins produced in this organism. Understanding the orchestration of the organismal responses to the external or internal stimuli is based on the understanding of the interactions of individual proteins and their complexes structures. The prediction of a complex of two or more proteins is the problem of the protein-protein docking field. Docking algorithms usually have two major steps: exhaustive 6D rigid-body search followed by the scoring. In this work we made contribution to both of these steps. We developed a novel algorithm for 6D exhaustive search, HermiteFit. It is based on Hermite decomposition of 3D functions into the Hermite basis. We implemented this algorithm in the program for fitting low-resolution electron density maps. We showed that it outperforms existing algorithms in terms of time-per-point while maintaining the same output model accuracy. We also developed a novel approach to computation of a scoring function, which is based on simple logical arguments and avoids an ambiguous computation of the reference state. We compared it to the existing scoring functions on the widely used protein-protein docking benchmarks. Finally, we developed an approach to include water-protein interactions into the scoring functions and validated our method during the Critical Assessment of Protein Interactions round 47
Lassmann, Timo. "Algorithms for building and evaluating multiple sequence alignments /." Stockholm, 2006. http://diss.kib.ki.se/2006/91-7140-887-8/.
Full textHosur, Raghavendra. "Structure-based algorithms for protein-protein interaction prediction." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75843.
Full textThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
Cataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 109-124).
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play a central role in all biological processes. Akin to the complete sequencing of genomes, complete descriptions of interactomes is a fundamental step towards a deeper understanding of biological processes, and has a vast potential to impact systems biology, genomics, molecular biology and therapeutics. PPIs are critical in maintenance of cellular integrity, metabolism, transcription/ translation, and cell-cell communication. This thesis develops new methods that significantly advance our efforts at structure- based approaches to predict PPIs and boost confidence in emerging high-throughput (HTP) data. The aims of this thesis are, 1) to utilize physicochemical properties of protein interfaces to better predict the putative interacting regions and increase coverage of PPI prediction, 2) increase confidence in HTP datasets by identifying likely experimental errors, and 3) provide residue-level information that gives us insights into structure-function relationships in PPIs. Taken together, these methods will vastly expand our understanding of macromolecular networks. In this thesis, I introduce two computational approaches for structure-based proteinprotein interaction prediction: iWRAP and Coev2Net. iWRAP is an interface threading approach that utilizes biophysical properties specific to protein interfaces to improve PPI prediction. Unlike previous structure-based approaches that use single structures to make predictions, iWRAP first builds profiles that characterize the hydrophobic, electrostatic and structural properties specific to protein interfaces from multiple interface alignments. Compatibility with these profiles is used to predict the putative interface region between the two proteins. In addition to improved interface prediction, iWRAP provides better accuracy and close to 50% increase in coverage on genome-scale PPI prediction tasks. As an application, we effectively combine iWRAP with genomic data to identify novel cancer related genes involved in chromatin remodeling, nucleosome organization and ribonuclear complex assembly - processes known to be critical in cancer. Coev2Net addresses some of the limitations of iWRAP, and provides techniques to increase coverage and accuracy even further. Unlike earlier sequence and structure profiles, Coev2Net explicitly models long-distance correlations at protein interfaces. By formulating interface co-evolution as a high-dimensional sampling problem, we enrich sequence/structure profiles with artificial interacting homologus sequences for families which do not have known multiple interacting homologs. We build a spanning-tree based graphical model induced by the simulated sequences as our interface profile. Cross-validation results indicate that this approach is as good as previous methods at PPI prediction. We show that Coev2Net's predictions correlate with experimental observations and experimentally validate some of the high-confidence predictions. Furthermore, we demonstrate how analysis of the predicted interfaces together with human genomic variation data can help us understand the role of these mutations in disease and normal cells.
by Raghavendra Hosur.
Ph.D.
Bazzoli, A. "Protein structure prediction and protein design with evolutionary algorithms." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/64478.
Full textLappe, Michael. "Novel algorithms for protein interaction networks." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.615625.
Full textSajjadi, Sajdeh [Verfasser]. "Step by step in fast protein-protein docking algorithms / Sajdeh Sajjadi." Lübeck : Zentrale Hochschulbibliothek Lübeck, 2014. http://d-nb.info/1060276887/34.
Full textC, Dukka Bahadur K. "Clique-based algorithms for protein structure prediction." 京都大学 (Kyoto University), 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/143887.
Full textThomas, Dallas, and University of Lethbridge Faculty of Arts and Science. "Algorithms & experiments for the protein chain lattice fitting problem." Thesis, Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Faculty of Arts and Science, 2006, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/535.
Full textix, 47 leaves ; 29 cm.
Gamalielsson, Jonas. "Models for Protein Structure Prediction by Evolutionary Algorithms." Thesis, University of Skövde, Department of Computer Science, 2001. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-623.
Full textEvolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been shown to be competent at solving complex, multimodal optimisation problems in applications where the search space is large and badly understood. EAs are therefore among the most promising classes of algorithms for solving the Protein Structure Prediction Problem (PSPP). The PSPP is how to derive the 3D-structure of a protein given only its sequence of amino acids. This dissertation defines, evaluates and shows limitations of simplified models for solving the PSPP. These simplified models are off-lattice extensions to the lattice HP model which has been proposed and is claimed to possess some of the properties of real protein folding such as the formation of a hydrophobic core. Lattice models usually model a protein at the amino acid level of detail, use simple energy calculations and are used mainly for search algorithm development. Off-lattice models usually model the protein at the atomic level of detail, use more complex energy calculations and may be used for comparison with real proteins. The idea is to combine the fast energy calculations of lattice models with the increased spatial possibilities of an off-lattice environment allowing for comparison with real protein structures. A hypothesis is presented which claims that a simplified off-lattice model which considers other amino acid properties apart from hydrophobicity will yield simulated structures with lower Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) to the native fold than a model only considering hydrophobicity. The hypothesis holds for four of five tested short proteins with a maximum of 46 residues. Best average RMSD for any model tested is above 6Å, i.e. too high for useful structure prediction and excludes significant resemblance between native and simulated structure. Hence, the tested models do not contain the necessary biological information to capture the complex interactions of real protein folding. It is also shown that the EA itself is competent and can produce near-native structures if given a suitable evaluation function. Hence, EAs are useful for eventually solving the PSPP.
Parry-Smith, David John. "Algorithms and data structures for protein sequence analysis." Thesis, University of Leeds, 1990. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.277404.
Full textBooks on the topic "Algorithms- Protein"
Rangwala, Huzefa. Introduction to protein structure prediction: Methods and algorithms. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2010.
Find full textRangwala, Huzefa, G. Karypis, and G. Karypis. Introduction to protein structure prediction: Methods and algorithms. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2010.
Find full textPan, Yi, Jianxin Wang, and Min Li. Algorithmic and Artificial Intelligence Methods for Protein Bioinformatics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118567869.
Full textAlgorithmic and artificial intelligence methods for protein bioinformatics. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, IEEE Computer Society, 2014.
Find full textDonald, Bruce R. Algorithms in structural molecular biology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2011.
Find full textInge, Jonassen, and Taylor W. R, eds. Protein bioinformatics: An algorithmic approach to sequence and structure analysis. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 2004.
Find full textM, Sansano Allen, and Langley Research Center, eds. Minimizing overhead in parallel algorithms through overlapping communication/computation. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1997.
Find full textSokolov, Artem, and Oleg Zhdanov. Cryptographic constructions on the basis of functions of multivalued logic. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1045434.
Full textKostyukov, Viktor. Molecular mechanics of biopolymers. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1010677.
Full textInformation-theoretic evaluation for computational biomedical ontologies. Cham: Springer, 2014.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Algorithms- Protein"
Jothi, Raja, and Teresa M. Przytycka. "Computational Approaches to Predict Protein-Protein and Domain-Domain Interactions." In Bioinformatics Algorithms, 465–91. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470253441.ch21.
Full textMalod-Dognin, Noël, Rumen Andonov, and Nicola Yanev. "Maximum Cliques in Protein Structure Comparison." In Experimental Algorithms, 106–17. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13193-6_10.
Full textYao, Yin, and Martin C. Frith. "Improved DNA-versus-Protein Homology Search for Protein Fossils." In Algorithms for Computational Biology, 146–58. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74432-8_11.
Full textMaji, Pradipta, and Sushmita Paul. "Identification of Disease Genes Using Gene Expression and Protein–Protein Interaction Data." In Scalable Pattern Recognition Algorithms, 155–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05630-2_6.
Full textvon Looz, Moritz, Mario Wolter, Christoph R. Jacob, and Henning Meyerhenke. "Better Partitions of Protein Graphs for Subsystem Quantum Chemistry." In Experimental Algorithms, 353–68. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38851-9_24.
Full textYoo, Paul D., Bing Bing Zhou, and Albert Y. Zomaya. "Protein Domain Boundary Prediction." In Algorithms in Computational Molecular Biology, 501–19. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470892107.ch23.
Full textYao, Qiuming, Jianjiong Gao, and Dong Xu. "Musite: Tool for Predicting Protein Phosphorylation Sites." In Encyclopedia of Algorithms, 1393–97. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2864-4_600.
Full textLi, Shuai Cheng, and Yen Kaow Ng. "On Protein Structure Alignment under Distance Constraint." In Algorithms and Computation, 65–76. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10631-6_9.
Full textYao, Qiuming, Jianjiong Gao, and Dong Xu. "Musite: Tool for Predicting Protein Phosphorylation Sites." In Encyclopedia of Algorithms, 1–5. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27848-8_600-1.
Full textDemaine, Erik D., Stefan Langerman, and Joseph O’Rourke. "Geometric Restrictions on Producible Polygonal Protein Chains." In Algorithms and Computation, 395–404. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24587-2_41.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Algorithms- Protein"
Hu, Jing, and Yihang Du. "Predicting Moonlighting Proteins from Protein Sequence." In 14th International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0011782300003414.
Full text"PYCOEVOL - A Python Workflow to Study Protein-protein Coevolution." In International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0003737901430149.
Full textLi, Zhao, Zhang Tianchi, and Zhang Jing. "Optimization Algorithms for Flexible Protein-Protein Docking." In 2012 Third International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdma.2012.135.
Full text"ProRank+ - A Method for Detecting Protein Complexes in Protein Interaction Networks." In International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms. SCITEPRESS - Science and and Technology Publications, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0004910802390244.
Full textArikawa, Keisuke. "Investigation of Algorithms for Analyzing Protein Internal Motion From Viewpoint of Robot Kinematics." In ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2010-28551.
Full text"PREDICTION OF CHIMERIC PROTEIN FOLD." In International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0003790102340239.
Full textZhang, Yan-Ping, Yong-Cheng Wang, Li-Na Zhang, and Chen-Chu Xu. "Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using covering algorithms." In Education (ICCSE 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccse.2010.5593619.
Full text"SUBSET SEED EXTENSION TO PROTEIN BLAST." In International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0003147601490158.
Full textWinter, Pawel, and Rasmus Fonseca. "Alpha Complexes in Protein Structure Prediction." In International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms. SCITEPRESS - Science and and Technology Publications, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0005251401780182.
Full textSatou, Kenji, Yoshiki Shimaguchi, Kunti Mahmudah, Ngoc Nguyen, Mera Delimayanti, Bedy Purnama, Mamoru Kubo, Makiko Kakikawa, and Yoichi Yamada. "Prediction of Subnuclear Location for Nuclear Protein." In 10th International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0007570502760280.
Full textReports on the topic "Algorithms- Protein"
Martin, Shawn Bryan, Kenneth L. Sale, Jean-Loup Michel Faulon, and Diana C. Roe. Developing algorithms for predicting protein-protein interactions of homology modeled proteins. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/883467.
Full textRangwala, Huzefa, and George Karypis. Incremental Window-based Protein Sequence Alignment Algorithms. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada444856.
Full textSapiro, Guillermo. New Forcefields and Algorithms for Computational Protein Design. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada428012.
Full textDeRonne, Kevin W., and George Karypis. Effective Optimization Algorithms for Fragment-Assembly Based Protein Structure Prediction. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada444732.
Full textRohrbough, James G., Linda Breci, Nirav Merchant, Susan Miller, and Paul A. Haynes. Verification of Single-Peptide Protein Identifications by the Application of Complementary Database Search Algorithms. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada439637.
Full textKim, Sangtae. Microstructural Models of Interactions That Govern Protein Conformations: Algorithms for High Performance Computer Architectures. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada360981.
Full textCARR, ROBERT D., GIUSEPPE LANCIA, and SORIN ISTRAIL. Branch-and-Cut Algorithms for Independent Set Problems: Integrality Gap and An Application to Protein Structure Alignment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/764804.
Full textGregurick, S. K. AB Initio Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction: Comparative-Genetic Algorithm with Graph Theoretical Methods. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/834523.
Full textGronberg, J., and J. Hollar. Trigger Algorithm Design for a SUSY Lepton Trigger based on Forward Proton Tagging. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/975215.
Full textSnihur, Robert Michael. Subjet multiplicity of quark and gluon jets reconstructed with the relative transverse momenta algorithm in proton - anti-proton collisions. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1421439.
Full text