Academic literature on the topic 'Alberta Educational Communications Corporation'

Studies have shown how digital communications impact administrators’ work, but few have looked at the reputational risks to school administrators incurred through social media and digital communications. This Alberta case study looks at risk through Kasperson et. al’s (1988) social amplification of risk framework for an exclusion room controversy. Twitter responses are analyzed and interpreted over a longitudinal, 5-year period. Despite school administrators’ perceptions that risk might be generated on social media from community-led, grass-roots sources, traditional figures and agencies such as provincial news media and politicians appear more influential than school administrators, teachers, or parents in the Twitterverse. Implications are drawn for educational administrative behaviour and policy.

In this article we present our findings regarding the systemic impacts of the Environmental Education for the Communities (ECOA) program, an educational program sponsored by the Alcoa Institute. The program, which was developed from 2014 to 2016 in Brazil, involved one corporation (Alcoa Institute), one educational consulting firm (Evoluir), seven Municipal Departments of Education and 30 schools and its surrounding communities. The program promoted environmental awareness following a project-based learning approach: first the students became aware of certain socio-environmental problems in their areas, and then they developed projects to address these problems with support of local communities and guidance from teachers and Evoluir’s educators. Our research objective was to understand the impacts of the program. We followed a qualitative research approach, collecting data by means of document analysis and interviews, unveiling the recurrent themes and analyzing the connections between them by means of a systemic analysis. Our main findings were: 1) The use of the PBL approach, involving schools and communities in joint planning and execution processes, promoted environmental awareness and strengthened the ties between the schools and local communities. 2) The PBL approach challenged the students to solve real-life problems, improving their critical thinking, their communications and problem-solving skills, leading to the improvement of their self-confidence and in their interest in learning. 3) The PBL approach empowered the teachers, motivating them to study and to make connections with community partners, thus changing the ways the courses were conducted and the relationships between school and local communities.

Abstract Jatinangor district, located in Sumedang regency, is experiencing forest degradation due to rapid development spurred by its designation as a transport hub between Bandung, Garut, and Sumedang. In order to facilitate more environmentally sustainable developments in Jatinangor, approaches involving local communities in land rehabilitation is essential. One such proposal is the development of 8.18 ha of land in Jatiroke Village. In collaboration with Jatiroke locals and Geulis Mountain Communications Forum (GMCF) and PT. Kahatex, the land is planned to be transformed into a green open space for ecotourism complex based on the DEWA (Desa Edukasi Wisata Agro or Agro-tourism Educational Village) concept ensuring sustained benefits for the environment and the local populace. The complex is planned to have intensive and non-intensive zones. The intensive zone facilitates the visitors and supporting utilities while the non-intensive zone facilitates vegetation cultivation. The area’s planned main conservation facility is the Arboretum of Textile Dyeing Trees which hosts 20 tree species, 2 bush species, and 4 herb species traditionally used as dyes and are native to Western Java. This forest restoration project, involving collaboration with villagers and a corporation, is slated to exemplify the importance of environmental sustainability through ecotourism and education for all involved.

One of the important directions in the development of modern corporate reporting is the disclosure of the sustainable development of a corporation, which involves assessing the results of operations and managing changes on the way to a sustainable economy that combines data on long-term profitability, social responsibility and care for environmental protection. Therefore, non-financial reporting is becoming the main tool for communicating the information to stakeholders about the economic, environmental, and social results of a corporation’s activities. Currently, the publication of non-financial reports is carried out by transnational and large national corporations, state and municipal organizations in many countries. In the Russian Federation, the need to promote non-financial reporting is approved by the Concept for the Development of Public Non-Financial Reporting (Concept), as a state task that defines this reporting as an element of the management system, development of communications with stakeholders, a prerequisite for increasing efficiency and strengthening corporate competitiveness. A significant impact on the development of public non-financial reporting was made by the United Nations resolution containing 17 goals in the field of sustainable development, which determines the need to develop indicators that evaluate the achievement of goals at the national and global levels and reflect the contribution of the corporation to sustainable development, which are solved in the framework of public nonfinancial reporting. Large and transnational corporations are encouraged to apply sustainable production practices and reflect information on the rational use of resources in their reports. Meaningful, complete, timely, accurate, balanced, comparable and reliable information of public non-financial reporting ensures that stakeholders make informed economic decisions about the sustainability of the corporation, the impact on the environment and society. At the state level, information from public non-financial reporting makes it possible to assess the achievement of strategic goals, the need to combine or separate the activities of sectors of society. The aim of the study was to assess the key concepts of sustainability reporting, the order and specifics of disclosure of its elements and material topics reflecting the impact of the corporation on the economy, environment and society. Among the objectives set by the authors is the assessment of the principles of this type of reporting: comparability, completeness, timeliness, and verifiability, which are closely related to those used in financial reporting. Since the calculation of separate indicators of non-financial reporting and the methodology of formation of consolidated financial reporting (participation method, joint activities, etc.) are closely related, the scope of the study includes the ways of reflecting the elements of reporting. Such scientific methods as logical, expert and substantive analyses, interpretation were used in the work. The results of the research can be used by corporate specialists in the formation of reporting in the field of sustainable development, university professors in the educational process, and other parties interested in the results of corporate activities

ABSTRACT Oil spill response and equipment deployment training is a vital part of oil spill contingency planning. The Petroleum Industry Training Service has recognized the oil industry's needs in this regard and has established a number of oil spill related courses. These programs have been constructed to meet individual needs for contingency planning, response planning, equipment handling, cleanup techniques, and restoration procedures. Our organization understands the need for practical field training and because of this has designed the material around effective communications, coordination, cooperation, and case histories. In our training programs the varied subject matter is covered by personnel from the oil industry and regulatory agencies. Each of these individuals is well experienced in oil spill countermeasures and is capable of providing both theoretical and practical information. In addition, the province of Alberta, Canada, has been divided into 24 oil spill cooperatives. Each co-op is required to provide adequately trained personnel who can respond to and handle an oil spill on land, water, or under ice conditions. To make the educational process more effective, a full-time oil spill training coordinator is available to assist the cooperative chairman and his members with response planning and training exercise details. The system of classroom orientation, case studies, and hands-on field training has proven successful over the past five years, has paid dividends to the oil industry and regulatory agencies, and has received positive comments from many oil spill strategy groups.

The purpose of this research was to study how researchers and practitioners from universities and school authorities in Alberta, Canada, lead eleven research partnership projects, shared work and learning responsibilities, as well as understood their common challenges. Project leaders (N = 38) revealed their perceptions of the research partnership through an online survey and semi-structured interviews. Practitioners indicated advantages to partnering such as access to research expertise and data analysis tools in addition to deepening their research skills for educational decision making. Researchers outlined three benefits to the partnership: having access to research sites, learning more about current issues in schools, and developing relationships with practitioners. The researchers explained that these relationships would facilitate their ability to complete future research and conduct knowledge mobilization activities that would reach professional and academic audiences. Both researchers and participants identified challenges, such as time, communications, reporting requirements, and unforeseen circumstances while engaging in these research partnerships. Key words: University-school partnerships; educational partnerships; researcher-practitioner partnership; knowledge mobilization; case study L'objectif de cette recherche était d'étudier comment les chercheurs et les praticiens des universités et des autorités scolaires de l'Alberta, au Canada, ont dirigé onze projets de partenariat de recherche, partagé les responsabilités de travail et d'apprentissage, et perçu leurs défis communs. Les chefs de projet (N = 38) ont révélé leurs perceptions du partenariat de recherche par le biais d'un sondage en ligne et d'entrevues semi-structurées. Les praticiens ont indiqué les avantages du partenariat, tels que l'accès à l'expertise en recherche et aux outils d'analyse des données, en plus de l'approfondissement de leurs compétences en recherche pour la prise de décision en matière d'éducation. Les chercheurs ont souligné trois avantages du partenariat : avoir accès à des sites de recherche, en apprendre davantage sur les problèmes actuels dans les écoles et développer des relations avec les praticiens. Les chercheurs ont expliqué que ces relations faciliteraient leur capacité à réaliser des recherches futures et à mener des activités de mobilisation des connaissances qui toucheraient des publics professionnels et universitaires. Les chercheurs et les participants ont identifié des défis, tels que le temps, les communications, les exigences en matière de rapports et les circonstances imprévues, dans le cadre de ces partenariats de recherche. Mots clés : partenariats université-école; partenariats éducatifs; partenariat chercheur-praticien; mobilisation des connaissances; étude de cas.

The relevance of this scientific work is expressed in the need to determine the national characteristics of the professional journalism environment of the Republic of Korea (ROK) and to make an analysis. The object of the study was professional journalism in the Republic of Korea. The subject of this study is the activities of journalistic unions and organizations in the Republic of Korea, namely: the Korean Communications Commission, the Korean Broadcasting Advertising Corporation, the Association of Journalists of Korea, the Korean Association of Broadcasters, the Korean Association of Scientific Journalism, the Korean Press Foundation, the Korean Newspaper Association and other local professional associations. The collection of information on the functioning of Korean professional communities in the field of media and organizations controlling journalistic activities was carried out during the period from December 15, 2023 to January 15, 2024. The main research methods were the analysis of regulatory documents, qualitative content analysis, as well as the single-outcome case study method to determine the specifics of the experience of the Republic of Korea. As of 2024, in the Republic of Korea (ROK), control over professional journalistic activities is carried out using a centralized system supported and supervised by government organizations. The article presents an analysis of the activities of professional journalistic communities operating in the Republic of Korea. A general description of the five largest associations and organizations is given. The study showed that the actions of government institutions, organizations and associations of the professional journalistic community of the Republic of Korea are associated with the introduction of a model of integration control of regulatory authorities into the basis of the activities of the associations studied by us. As an illustrative example of the activities of a professional journalistic association, the Association of Journalists of Korea was chosen, whose activities were analyzed in accordance with the following criteria: features of the structure, areas of activity, international integration, interaction with government departments, educational activities, a system of support and material support for journalists.

Background:In the absence of evidence-based treatment guidelines, medication use in SLE is highly variable. Low rates of remission and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) suggest that suboptimal responses to standard medications, which include glucocorticoids (GC), anti-malarial (AM) drugs and immunosuppressive (IS) agents, are common. Understanding the utility of current medications will facilitate the selection of patients for advanced therapies as they emerge.Objectives:To examine medication use patterns in a large multicentre SLE cohort.Methods:We used 2013-18 data from the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) cohort in which disease activity (SLEDAI-2K) and medication details were captured at every visit. LLDAS was defined as in Golderet al., 2019 (1). We examined the use of medication (med) categories (GC &/or AM &/or IS) by SLE disease activity and LLDAS at the visit level. Additionally, we performed Cox regression analyses to determine the time-to-discontinuation of meds stratified by SLE disease activity, ranked by time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K, and by percent-time spent in LLDAS.Results:We analysed data from 19,804 visits of 2,860 patients. We observed 8 med categories: no meds; GC, AM or IS only; GC+AM; GC+IS; AM+IS and GC+AM+IS (triple therapy). Triple therapy was the most frequent med pattern (32%); single agents were used in 21% of visits and biologicals in only 3%. Among visits where SLEDAI-2K was ≥10, triple therapy was used in 46%, with median [IQR] GC dose 10 [6, 24] mg/day; in contrast, among visits with SLEDAI-2K≤4 triple therapy was used in 28% (p<0.01). Patients in LLDAS received less combination therapy than those who were not in LLDAS.Med persistence (survival analysis) varied widely, with lowest survivals for IS. Patients with time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K ≥10 had lower discontinuation of GC and higher discontinuation of IS including azathioprine, leflunomide and cyclosporine (Table 1). In contrast, increased time in LLDAS was associated with reduced discontinuation of AM and azathioprine.GCAMISMPhMPhAAZAMTXCyALEFOverall med survival, days to 25% discontinuation (95%CI)1048(938, 1197)1267(1113, 1428)175(175, 182)387(252, 756)409(350, 476)525(219, 686)268(182, 350)329(190, 524)Univariable associations,HR (95% CI) p-valueDisease activity≤41.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00>4 & <100.69 (0.56,0.84)p<0.0011.15 (0.92,1.44)0.20.92 (0.80,1.05)0.21.37 (0.78,2.42)0.31.16 (0.97,1.39)0.111.11 (0.72,1.71)0.61.26 (0.90,1.77) 0.181.88 (1.07,3.30) 0.03≥100.65 (0.35,1.21) 0.181.56 (0.94,2.59) 0.080.84 (0.45,1.57)0.61.92 (0.80,4.63)0.142.69 (1.86,3.91) p<0.0011.85 (0.92,3.71) 0.082.66 (1.36,5.21) 0.0041.62 (1.13,2.32)0.009LLDAS<50%1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00≥50%1.30 (1.09, 1.55)0.0030.67 (0.54, 0.84)<0.0011.22 (1.08, 1.40)0.0020.83 (0.44,1.57)0.60.83 (0.69, 1.00)0.0540.70 (0.46, 1.07)0.101.29 (0.92, 1.83)0.140.43 (1.5, 1.25)0.12Conclusion:In a large multicentre SLE cohort, most patients were receiving combination treatment. AM treatment survival was high and associated with low disease activity, GC survival was high and associated with high disease activity, while IS survival was low. Patients with high disease activity received more medication combinations but had reduced IS survival. These data suggest ongoing unmet need for improved medications for treatment of SLE.Reference:Golder, V., et al Lancet Rheum. 2019 1(2):e95-102Disclosure of Interests:Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake Grant/research support from: The APLC has received financial (non-restricted educational) grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly and UCB for the LLDAS Validation Study., Worawit Louthrenoo: None declared, Shue Fen Luo: None declared, Yeong-Jian Wu Consultant of: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Yi-Hsing Chen Grant/research support from: Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan Department of Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, GSK, Pfizer, BMS., Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead., Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Lilly, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, Astellas, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma., Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead., Vera Golder: None declared, Aisha Lateef: None declared, Jiacai Cho: None declared, Sandra Navarra Speakers bureau: Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, Leonid Zamora: None declared, Laniyati Hamijoyo Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Tanabe, Abbot, Dexa Medica, Roche, Sargunan Sockalingam: None declared, Yuan An: None declared, Zhanguo Li: None declared, Yasuhiro Katsumata: None declared, masayoshi harigai Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Oxford Immuotec, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Teijin Pharma., Yanjie Hao: None declared, Zhuoli Zhang: None declared, Madelynn Chan: None declared, Jun Kikuchi: None declared, Tsutomu Takeuchi Grant/research support from: Eisai Co., Ltd, Astellas Pharma Inc., AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, UCB Pharma, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Consultant of: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Astellas Pharma Inc., Eli Lilly Japan KK, Speakers bureau: AbbVie GK, Eisai Co., Ltd, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corp., Eisai Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Sanofi K.K., Dainippon Sumitomo Co., Ltd., Fiona Goldblatt: None declared, Sean O’Neill: None declared, Chetan Karyekar Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC. Previously, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Abbott Labs., Jennifer H. Lofland Employee of: Janssen, Sang-Cheol Bae: None declared, Chak Sing Lau: None declared, Alberta Hoi: None declared, Mandana Nikpour: None declared, Eric F. Morand Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca

Abstract Background: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that originates from precursors of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. BPDCN is a difficult disease to diagnose and manage and it is often misdiagnosed or underreported. The literature widely supports the need for an interdisciplinary team of physicians with specialized expertise to care for patients with BPDCN, such as dermatologists, pathologists, hematologists/oncologists (hem/oncs), stem cell transplant physicians and others. Aim: The objective of this study was to determine if online education could improve the knowledge of the interdisciplinary physician team members about BPDCN as well as their skills and confidence diagnosing this rare malignancy. Methods: Dermatologists, pathologists, and hem/oncs participated in a series of 6 live continuing medical education (CME)-certified activities, after which the recorded content was posted online as a single online enduring CME-certified activity. Content for the CME activities was developed by a multidisciplinary group of BPDCN experts and was delivered through an approximately 1-hour lecture. Data presented here is for the online enduring activity only. Educational effect was assessed using a repeated-pair design with pre-/post-assessment. Three multiple choice questions assessed knowledge/skills, and 1 question rated on a Likert-type scale assessed confidence. A paired samples t-test was conducted for significance testing on overall average number of correct responses and for confidence rating, and a McNemar's test was conducted at the question and learning objective level (5% significance level, P &lt;.05). Data were collected from December 10, 2020 to May 3, 2021. Results: There were 246 dermatologists, 302 pathologists, and 316 hem/oncs included in this analysis, for overall n=864. PRACTICE SETTING: Dermatologists: 57% community, 15% academic, 13% government, 15% other; Pathologists: 37% community, 37% other, 23% academic, 4% government; Hem/Oncs: 48% community, 31% academic, 14% government, 7% other.OVERALL RESULTS: Overall 46% of dermatologists, 42% of pathologists, and 48% of hem/oncs improved their knowledge/skills related to BPDCN (P &lt;.001 for all), showing a relative increase in responses correct from pre- to post-CME of 67% for dermatologists, 38% for pathologists, and 45% for hem/oncs.CONFIDENCE: 50% of dermatologists, 50% of pathologists, and 49% of hem/oncs had a measurable increase in confidence (P &lt;.001 for all), resulting in 30% of dermatologists, 31% of pathologists, and 36% of hem/oncs who were mostly or very confident diagnosing BPDCN post-CME (9%, 14%, 17% pre-CME, respectively).The Table shows the mean percentage of correct responses by learning objective and the question used to test each learning objective. 20%/54% of dermatologists, 22%/57% of pathologists, and 20%/55% of hem/oncs improved/reinforced their knowledge of the most common cutaneous manifestations of BPDCN and 26%, 22%, 25% need additional education, respectively. CME improved skills ordering tests to diagnose BPDCN, however 57% of dermatologists, 58% of pathologists, and 45% of hem/oncs demonstrate a need for additional education about stains that can aid in diagnosing BPDCN. Conclusions: This online CME-certified educational activity led to statistically significant improvements in the knowledge and skills of dermatologists, pathologists, and hem/oncs about BPDCN as well as their skills and confidence diagnosing this rare malignancy. The results indicate that unique educational methodologies which are available on-demand can be effective tools for advancing clinical decision making. Additional education is recommended on the topics of cutaneous manifestations of BPDCN and case-based education to improve skills diagnosing BPDCN. Acknowledgements: This CME activity was supported by an independent educational grant from Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. Reference: https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/942245 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau. Sweet: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Guitart: Miragen, Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Galderma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Solygenix, Elorac, Nanostring: Research Funding. Pemmaraju: LFB Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Aptitude Health: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Other, Research Funding; Plexxicon: Other, Research Funding; Springer Science + Business Media: Other; Cellectis S.A. ADR: Other, Research Funding; CareDx, Inc.: Consultancy; Affymetrix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche Diagnostics: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Research Support, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy; Sager Strong Foundation: Other; ASCO Leukemia Advisory Panel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASH Communications Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MustangBio: Consultancy, Other; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Dan's House of Hope: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; HemOnc Times/Oncology Times: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samus: Other, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Clearview Healthcare Partners: Consultancy; ImmunoGen, Inc: Consultancy; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Poligone: Stemline, Helsinn, Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Soligenix, Miragen, Helsinn, Bioniz: Research Funding; Stemline, Therakos, Regeneron: Speakers Bureau.

Background Research shows that women and racialized minorities are misrepresented and underrepresented across popular media. To date, however, limited attention has been given to the representation of these groups as expert news sources within Canadian television.Analysis This study conducts an analysis of three public affairs shows aired by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and the Ontario Educational Communications Authority over a four-month period, cataloguing the gender and racialized minority status of 737 on-air guests.Conclusions & implications The findings show that women and racialized minorities are underrepresented, with racialized minority women being particularly disadvantaged.RÉSUMÉ Contexte De nombreuses études démontrent que les femmes et les minorités racialisées sont sous-représentées et aussi faussement représentées par les médias populaires. À ce jour, toutefois, peu d’attention semble avoir été portée à la représentation de ces groupes comme source d’experts.es. invités.es pour analyser l’actualité à la télévision canadienne.Analyse Cette étude a pour objectif d’effectuer une analyse de trois émissions d’affaires publiques diffusées par Radio-Canada (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) et the Ontario Educational Communications Authority sur une période de quatre mois en cataloguant le genre et le statut de minorité racialisée de 737 invités.es en ondes.Conclusions et implications Les conclusions démontrent que les femmes et les minorités racialisées sont sous-représentées et que les femmes issues de groupes raciaux minoritaires sont particulièrement désavantagées.