Academic literature on the topic 'Agricultural cooperatives'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Agricultural cooperatives.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Agricultural cooperatives"
Myagmarzul, N. "The sales income analysis of agricultural cooperatives." Mongolian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17, no. 1 (January 3, 2017): 49–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.5564/mjas.v17i1.727.
Full textNguyen Thi, Hai Ninh. "Policies supporting for agricultural cooperatives in Vietnam: An experience from agricultural cooperatives in the Red River Delta." Technium Social Sciences Journal 25 (November 9, 2021): 126–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v25i1.4967.
Full textGołębiewski, Jarosław. "EVOLUTION OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN ISRAEL." Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists XIX, no. 5 (November 30, 2017): 80–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.6211.
Full textTrihandoyo, Agus, Satya Arisena Hendrawan, and Putriarrum Kusuma Wardani. "Pencatatan Digital dengan Google Forms Pada Koperasi Petani di Karanganyar." Jurnal Abdimas ADPI Sains dan Teknologi 3, no. 4 (December 30, 2022): 05–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.47841/saintek.v3i4.261.
Full textSuchoń, Aneta. "Spółdzielczość rolnicza we Francji i Niemczech – wybrane zagadnienia prawne i ekonomiczne." Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego 18(33), no. 4 (December 28, 2018): 451–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.22630/prs.2018.18.4.133.
Full textPonomarenko, I., N. Lebid, A. Ihnatchenko, Yu Khymchenko, and B. Kovalov. "ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL FORMS OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN UKRAINE." Vìsnik Sumsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu 2021, no. 3 (2021): 145–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/1817-9215.2021.3-16.
Full textIliopoulos, C., M. L. Cook, and F. Chaddad. "Agricultural cooperatives in netchains." Journal on Chain and Network Science 16, no. 1 (September 14, 2016): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/jcns2016.x003.
Full textĐurić, Katarina. "Measures of support to the development of agricultural cooperatives in the Republic of Serbia." Ekonomija: teorija i praksa 15, no. 1 (2022): 25–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/etp2201025d.
Full textRoyer, Jeffrey. "Financing agricultural cooperatives with retained earnings." Agricultural Finance Review 77, no. 3 (September 4, 2017): 393–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/afr-06-2016-0060.
Full textŠevarlić, Miladin M., Marija M. Nikolić, and Richard Simmons. "Agricultural cooperatives and their membership in cooperative unions in Serbia." Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 4, no. 3-4 (October 30, 2010): 25–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2010/3-4/4.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Agricultural cooperatives"
Gala, Xoliswa Masingita Hlubelihle. "Challenges facing LED Agricultural cooperative in the Greater Tzaneen Municipality : a case study of Nkomamonta Primary Agricultural Cooperative in Limpopo." Thesis, University of Limpopo (Turfloop Campus), 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/1015.
Full textAgricultural cooperatives have been widely promoted as a vehicle for smallholder agricultural development in South Africa. As a result, agricultural co-operative registrations in South Africa are increasing. However, research suggests that South African co-operatives have generally not been effective, successful and functional. This study has investigated the challenges facing agricultural cooperatives in the Greater Tzaneen Municipality. It is expected that identification of these elements may enable institutions that offer support to cooperatives make better decisions to improve primary agricultural cooperatives support. Understanding of these elements could inform the efforts for members of cooperatives to achieve their set objectives and thus improve agriculture cooperative, employability, functionality and profitability. A case study of the Nkomamonta Agricultural Primary Cooperative in the Greater Tzaneen Municipalities is used. It is composed of fifteen agricultural cooperative which were purposively selected for the study because they were nearby, they are a pilot agricultural cooperative in the municipality and which are also not functioning as expected. The sample also included the purposively selected members, customers of these agricultural cooperative, workers, Greater Tzaneen Municipality, Local SEDA and LIBSA to explore the differences and provide insight to the knowledge, opinions and challenges that are facing agricultural cooperatives. One-on-one interviews were carried out with co-operative members as well as focus group discussions with customers, members of the cooperatives, workers, the Municipal officials, SEDA and LIBSA. A framework for analysing the challenges agricultural cooperatives with reference to the Nkomamonta cooperative case study was developed using literature of objectives of agricultural cooperatives, challenges which were identified by other researchers and success factors of smallholder agriculture. According to this study, farmers’ activities are hampered by a number of constraints. Production capability of the fifteen primary cooperatives is hampered by resource constraints such as lack of access to land (in one cooperative), machinery and equipment, finances and information relevant to production. Marketing, transportation, poor infrastructure and the elderly age of some cooperative members and issues related to free-rider syndrome were part of the problems that were identified. Low capability of some of the fifteen cooperatives to mobilise resources, use the limited resources available and low capability to manage institutional arrangements rendered the cooperatives ineffective in achieving their set objectives. The study recommends strategies for ensuring that the challenges facing agricultural cooperatives are minimised to better their services in the community. These include strategies for addressing internal and external issues affecting the cooperatives. Direct intervention from government is recommended to improve production through revising land allocation systems which made Kulani Agricultural Cooperative not to have land for growing crops. Jerry Jeff and Nwa Rex went out of action for eight months due to renovation of neighbourhood inorganic farms by the Department of Agriculture. Another strategy would entail improving extension services and follow up and strict monitoring of effective use of government resources provided to farmers. Responding and action taking when disaster has struck the agricultural cooperative by Government is also a plausible strategy. Access and training to relevant technologies to improve the processing and packaging capabilities of cooperatives should improve. Marketing and management activities should be supported through provision of improved infrastructure and relevant training. Farmers themselves should consider assisting one another especially regarding land issues as it was discovered that 67 hectares lay unutilised while the farmer next door needed land. Farmers should also engage in value added activities, and improve marketing programs and cost-effective distribution mechanisms.
Tsholoba, Nokulunga. "Sustainability of agricultural cooperatives in Emalahleni Local Municipality." Thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10948/4133.
Full textNASCIMENTO, JULIO CESAR DE OLIVEIRA FAUSTINO DO. "AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES: COST OF CAPITAL AND VALUE CREATION." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2015. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=25016@1.
Full textThe objective of this dissertation is to evaluate the cost of capital and economic value added of agricultural cooperatives of Brazil. For this purpose, it was analysed the financial statements of 28 agricultural cooperatives from differents sectors over 7 years. The results indicates that the weight average cost of capital is 6,63 percent per year and that most of cooperatives are generating value for their members, with means of 18.889 reais.
Pokharel, Krishna Prasad. "Measuring the efficiency and productivity of agricultural cooperatives." Diss., Kansas State University, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/32944.
Full textDepartment of Agricultural Economics
Allen M. Featherstone
This dissertation focuses on measuring the efficiency and productivity for agricultural cooperatives in the United States using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Economic measures such as cost efficiency, economies of scale, and economies of scope are measured by estimating a cost frontier in a multiproduct framework. Productivity growth is measured using the biennial Malmquist index approach. The cost frontier is the basis for calculating cost efficiency, economies of scale, and economies of scope as the cost frontier estimation in a multiproduct approach describes how cost changes as output changes. The estimates of economies of scale and scope have important implications for agricultural cooperatives because most of the cooperatives sell more than one product. Understanding the impact of changing output levels or mixes on the cost structure is helpful to improve the performance of cooperatives. Further, scope economies estimate the percentage of cost savings through product diversification in a multiproduct firm. The trade-off between cost efficiency and multiproduct scale economies allows the estimation of whether a higher percentage of cost can be eliminated by becoming cost efficient or changing the scale of operations. The economic measures are estimated using a single cost frontier (multi-year frontier) and annual cost frontiers. Multiproduct economies of scale and economies of scope exist indicating that increasing scale and product diversification can reduce cost for agricultural cooperatives. The mean values of product-specific economies of scale for all outputs are close to one indicating that cooperatives are operating close to constant returns to scale. The comparison between cost efficiency and scale economies suggests that smaller cooperatives can save a higher percentage of cost by increasing the scale of operations rather than just becoming cost efficient. Because larger incentives exist for small cooperatives to increase scale, mergers will likely continue until economies of scale are exhausted in the industry. Annual estimates show that agricultural cooperatives have become less cost efficient over time, but economies of scale and economies of scope remain consistent across years. Many agricultural cooperatives face economies of scale indicating that variable returns to scale as opposed to constant returns to scale is the appropriate technology for modeling agricultural farm marketing and supply cooperatives. Further, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test and two sample t-test are used to examine whether economic measures estimated from a single frontier and annual frontiers are statistically different. The KS test and t-test indicate that economic measures obtained from the single frontier are statistically different from those measures calculated from annual frontiers. This indicates that the cost frontier has shifted over time. Productivity growth of agricultural cooperatives is estimated using the biennial Malmquist productivity index (BMI) under variable returns to scale over the period 2005 to 2014. The BMI avoids numerical infeasibilities under variable returns to scale compared to traditional methods. The BMI is decomposed into efficiency change and technical change to evaluate the sources of productivity growth. Overall, agricultural cooperatives gained 34% cumulative productivity growth during the decade allocated by -2% and 37% cumulative technical efficiency change and technical change over the study period. Technical change was the major source of productivity growth rather than efficiency change. Cooperatives can achieve higher productivity by increasing managerial efficiency and by investing in technology.
Chaddad, Fabio R. "Financial constraints in U.S. agricultural cooperatives : theory and panel data econometric evidence /." free to MU campus, to others for purchase, 2001. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/mo/fullcit?p3036812.
Full textLiebenberg, Isabel Elsje. "Determining economic value added for agricultural co-operatives in South Africa." Diss., Pretoria : [s.n.], 2004. http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-01182005-101059.
Full textPlunkett, Bradley. "The portfolio problem in agricultural cooperatives an integrated framework /." Diss., Columbia, Mo. : University of Missouri-Columbia, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10355/4112.
Full textThe entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file viewed on (May 15, 2007) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
Schweiss, Kristi. "An Analysis of Financial Risk Measures within Agricultural Cooperatives." Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/28396.
Full textKomape, Kwena. "Performance determinants for emerging agricultural cooperatives in South Africa." Master's thesis, Faculty of Commerce, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30469.
Full textOnofre, Gisele Ramos. "Capital e COAMO - Agroindustrial Cooperativa: a formação de um território." Universidade de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8136/tde-05102016-170424/.
Full textIn the study on the formation of Coamo´s territory of the capital, under a Historical Materialist Dialectic perspective, the agribusiness cooperative was characterized based on nuances of territorialization and monopolization of the capital and its influence on society, examining the elements that were responsible within the cooperatives for the optimization of the capital in the field. To achieve this aim, we needed the debate on the participation of Coamo as an instrument of penetration of the capital in agricultural activities, consolidating the structure of capitalist agriculture, affecting the entire social process not only in the region of Campo Mourão, but also reaching the states of Santa Catarina and Mato Grosso do Sul. In the study of the expansion of the territory of the capital, it was considered, as the theoretical basis, the understanding of two major triads: land, labor and capital that are essential elements in revealing the contradictions of the capitalist mode of production - and the capital, land and Coamo, which are elements that connect themselves to the national processes and contribute to the understanding of the contradictions created in the development of the capitalist mode of production. Stated the problem that involves the formation of hegemonic territory, it was taken into consideration the discussions and issues got by data collecting and interviews about the performance of cooperative Coamo, which is one of the largest cooperative in Latin America. For didactic purposes, the research was divided into two macro-interpretations, considering the spatial area of the region of Campo Mourão as the geographic limits. In general, a research line was directed to the particularities of the State of Paraná and the region of Campo Mourão, in relation to capital deepening in the field, with the direct participation of Coamo, among other internal and external agents, historically linked to the conflicts and struggles enrolled for the appropriation of land and regulations. The other trend of interpretation is not apart from the first, complementing the analysis about the subject by presenting global and national vicissitudes generated during the formation of the territory\'s capital, with the assistance and integration of agricultural cooperatives. At this point, it was emphasized Coamo ´s role played in the formation of this territory. From the analysis of macro-interpretations, it was possible to record information about the phenomenon of territorial and capitalist monopoly which is intensifying across the country, affecting practically all countries of the world. To this end, the study of capitalist territorial, was cast a range of contributions from authors and Karl Marx one of the greatest representatives of the study of capital productivity, which based the thought of his doctoral thesis. Finally, we point out that for its strengthening, capital is producing new moldings in cooperatives that become more and more a way of reproduction and accumulation of capital, firming its development also in cooperative databases, that is cooperatives called capitalists.
Books on the topic "Agricultural cooperatives"
United States. Rural Development Administration. Cooperative Services., ed. Understanding cooperatives: Cooperative business principles. [Washington, D.C.?: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Development Administration, Cooperative Services, 1994.
Find full textUnited States. Rural Development. Rural Business and Cooperative Programs. Understanding cooperatives: Cooperative business principles. Washington, D.C.?]: United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Cooperative Programs, 2011.
Find full textMcBride, Glynn. Agricultural Cooperatives. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3.
Full textUnited States. Rural Development Administration. Cooperative Services., ed. Understanding cooperatives: The structure of cooperatives. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Development Administration, Cooperative Services, 1994.
Find full textUnited States. Rural Development Administration. Cooperative Services, ed. Understanding cooperatives: The structure of cooperatives. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Development Administration, Cooperative Services, 1994.
Find full textUnited States. Rural Development Administration. Cooperative Services, ed. Understanding cooperatives: Who runs the cooperative business? : members. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Development Administration, Cooperative Services, 1994.
Find full textUnited States. Rural Development Administration. Cooperative Services., ed. Understanding cooperatives: Who runs the cooperative business? : members. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Development Administration, Cooperative Services, 1994.
Find full textUnited States. Rural Business and Cooperative Development Service., ed. Understanding cooperatives. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Business and Cooperative Development Service, 1995.
Find full textCsaki, Csaba, and Yoav Kislev. Agricultural Cooperatives in Transition. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429041693.
Full textCsaba, Csáki, and Kislev Yoav 1932-, eds. Agricultural cooperatives in transition. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Agricultural cooperatives"
Gray, Thomas. "Agricultural Cooperatives." In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, 55–63. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_203.
Full textGray, Thomas. "Agricultural Cooperatives." In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, 1–10. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_203-1.
Full textGray, Thomas. "Agricultural Cooperatives." In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, 46–54. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_203.
Full textMcBride, Glynn. "Financing Agricultural Cooperatives." In Agricultural Cooperatives, 145–57. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3_9.
Full textMcBride, Glynn. "Marketing and Structure—How Related to Group Action." In Agricultural Cooperatives, 3–18. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3_1.
Full textMcBride, Glynn. "Cooperative Financing—Internal Sources of Capital." In Agricultural Cooperatives, 159–71. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3_10.
Full textMcBride, Glynn. "Cooperative Financing—External Sources of Capital." In Agricultural Cooperatives, 173–93. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3_11.
Full textMcBride, Glynn. "Equity Redemption Plans Used by Cooperatives." In Agricultural Cooperatives, 195–215. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3_12.
Full textMcBride, Glynn. "Cooperatives—Taxation and the Law." In Agricultural Cooperatives, 217–34. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3_13.
Full textMcBride, Glynn. "Cooperatives and Federal Commodity Marketing Orders." In Agricultural Cooperatives, 235–60. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6882-3_14.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Agricultural cooperatives"
Yücel, Mustafa, Yaşar Aktaş, and Neslişah Taner. "What are the New Functions of Agriculture Cooperatives in the Progress of Globalization? The Case of Agriculture Cooperatives of Kastamonu." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c06.01231.
Full textSUBIĆ, Jonel, and Marko JELOČNIK. "ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF PUBLIC SUPPORT IN PROMOTION OF COOPERATIVES IN SERBIA." In Competitiveness of Agro-Food and Environmental Economy. Editura ASE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24818/cafee/2021/10/12.
Full textPurić, Sveto. "SLOŽENA ZEMLjORADNIČKA ZADRUGA – BORBA ZA KVANTITET, KVALITET I KONTINUITET." In XV Majsko savetovanje: Sloboda pružanja usluga i pravna sigurnost. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xvmajsko.093p.
Full textLi, Yi, and Zhu Xihua. "Short Analysis of the stakeholders’ benefit and satisfaction about Rural Land Share Cooperatives of the Southern Jiangsu Province." In 55th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Beyond Metropolis, Jakarta-Bogor, Indonesia. ISOCARP, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.47472/ztfm2175.
Full textFeldmane, Liene, and Andra Zvirbule. "Influence of institutional framework on economic activity of agricultural cooperatives: Latvia’s case." In 21st International Scientific Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development 2020". Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Faculty of Economics and Social Development, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/esrd.2020.53.004.
Full textZvirbule, Andra, Anita Auzina, Gunta Grinberga-Zalite, and Diana Liva. "ORGANIC GRAIN PRODUCTION OPPORTUNITIES IN LATVIA BY USING THE MOST APPROPRIATE COOPERATION MODEL." In 22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference 2022. STEF92 Technology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s21.079.
Full textMatyja, Małgorzata, Magdalena Rajchelt-Zublewicz, and Estera Piwoni-Krzeszowska. "Financial Standing of Polish and Czech Agricultural Cooperatives." In Hradec Economic Days 2019, edited by Petra Maresova, Pavel Jedlicka, and Ivan Soukal. University of Hradec Kralove, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2019-02-008.
Full textKeshelashvili, Giuli. "CHARACTERISTICS OF MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN GEORGIA." In 32nd International Academic Conference, Geneva. International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.20472/iac.2017.032.020.
Full textEverest, Bengü, and Murat Yercan. "Cooperative Members’ Participation Status and Trends to Cooperative Management: Case of Regional Union of Agricultural Credit Cooperative in Balıkesir." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c07.01762.
Full textVerulidze, Vazha, and Inguna Leibus. "Trends in the development of agriculture in conditions of tax reform in Georgia." In 21st International Scientific Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development 2020". Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Faculty of Economics and Social Development, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/esrd.2020.53.030.
Full textReports on the topic "Agricultural cooperatives"
Finkelstain, Israel, Steven Buccola, and Ziv Bar-Shira. Pooling and Pricing Schemes for Marketing Agricultural Products. United States Department of Agriculture, August 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/1993.7568099.bard.
Full textRaitzer, David A., and Odbayar Batmunkh. Impact Evaluation of Support to Collective Action for Agricultural Value Chain Development in Nepal. Asian Development Bank, June 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/wps220137-2.
Full textChimombo, Masautso, Mirriam Matita, Loveness Mgalamadzi, Blessings Chinsinga, Ephraim Wadonda Chirwa, Stevier Kaiyatsa, and Jacob Mazalale. Interrogating the Effectiveness of Farmer Producer Organisations in Enhancing Smallholder Commercialisation – Frontline Experiences From Central Malawi. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), February 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/apra.2022.004.
Full textCulp, Elzie Lynn. Recovery Act:Rural Cooperative Geothermal development Electric & Agriculture. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1234533.
Full textGurung, M. B., Uma Pratap, N. C. T. D. Shrestha, H. K. Sharma, N. Islam, and N. B. Tamang. Beekeeping Training for Farmers in Afghanistan: Resource Manual for Trainers [in Urdu]. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.53055/icimod.564.
Full textAkhmetov, V. Y., Z. Z. Sabirova, and A. R. Aminova. Cooperative education and its role in the development of agricultural consumer cooperation in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Ljournal, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/a-s-a-1.
Full textJust, Richard E., Eithan Hochman, and Sinaia Netanyahu. Problems and Prospects in the Political Economy of Trans-Boundary Water Issues. United States Department of Agriculture, February 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2000.7573997.bard.
Full textDzebo, Adis, and Kevin M. Adams. The coffee supply chain illustrates transboundary climate risks: Insights on governance pathways. Stockholm Environment Institute, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51414/sei2022.002.
Full textElander, Richard. Conversion of Indigenous Agricultural Waste Feedstocks to Fuel Ethanol. Cooperative Research and Development Final Report, CRADA Number CRD-13-504. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1247126.
Full textMcIntyre, Phillip, Susan Kerrigan, and Marion McCutcheon. Australian Cultural and Creative Activity: A Population and Hotspot Analysis: Albury-Wodonga. Queensland University of Technology, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/rep.eprints.206966.
Full text