Academic literature on the topic 'Adult criminal court'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Adult criminal court.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Adult criminal court"

1

Rudman, Cary, Eliot Hartstone, Jeffrey Fagan, and Melinda Moore. "Violent Youth in Adult Court: Process and Punishment." Crime & Delinquency 32, no. 1 (January 1986): 75–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128786032001005.

Full text
Abstract:
Despite the widespread transfer of violent youth from juvenile to criminal court, there is little empirical knowledge of the transfer process, rate of transfer, or of case outcomes, sentences, and placements of transferred juveniles. This study examines these issues for 177 violent youths considered for transfer in four urban areas, comparing court outcomes for youths transferred to criminal court with those for youths retained in juvenile court. Varying procedures, criteria, and court rules result in case processing time averaging 2.5 times greater for transferred youth. Most spend this time in detention. Violent youth considered for transfer are adjudicated at a high rate for the offenses as charged in both juvenile and criminal court. Plea bargaining for charges rarely occurred. Youth considered for transfer but retained by the juvenile court received maximum commitments and placements within the jurisdictional limits of the juvenile justice system. Transferred youth convicted in criminal court received even more severe sanctions both in nature and length. Alternatives to incarceration were rarely used by either the juvenile or criminal court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Feld, Barry C. "Juvenile (In)Justice and the Criminal Court Alternative." Crime & Delinquency 39, no. 4 (October 1993): 403–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128793039004001.

Full text
Abstract:
The juvenile court has been transformed from an informal, welfare agency into a scaled-down, second-class criminal court as a result of a series of reforms that divert status offenders, waive serious offenders to adult criminal courts, punish delinquent offenders, and provide more formal procedures. There are three plausible policy responses to juvenile courts that punish in the name of treatment and deny elementary procedural justice: (a) restructure juvenile courts to fit their original therapeutic purpose; (b) accept punishment as the purpose of delinquency proceedings, but coupled with criminal procedural safeguards; or (c) abolish juvenile courts and try young offenders in criminal courts with certain substantive and procedural modifications.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Houghtalin, Marilyn, and G. Larry Mays. "Criminal Dispositions of New Mexico Juveniles Transferred to Adult Court." Crime & Delinquency 37, no. 3 (July 1991): 393–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128791037003006.

Full text
Abstract:
One of the lingering controversies surrounding the juvenile justice system in the United States is the transfer of juvenile offenders to adult criminal courts, ostensibly for more severe dispositions. This issue especially has been of concern as the “get-tough” movement seemingly has gained momentum over the past two decades. This article examines the waiver process in New Mexico to establish the characteristics of the juveniles subject to the process and to determine the actual, instead of symbolic, criminal court dispositions of juveniles tried as adults.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lehmann, Peter S., Ted Chiricos, and William D. Bales. "Sentencing Transferred Juveniles in the Adult Criminal Court." Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 15, no. 2 (November 11, 2016): 172–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541204016678048.

Full text
Abstract:
Much prior research has demonstrated that race and ethnicity are associated with harsher punishment outcomes among adult defendants in the criminal court. However, few studies have explored these disparities in the sentencing of juvenile offenders who have been transferred to the adult court, and this research has reported conflicting findings. Moreover, the ways in which offenders’ race and ethnicity may interact with their sex, age, and offense type have yet to be explored among this population. Analysis of defendants sentenced in Florida ( N = 30,913) reveals that Black transferred juveniles are more likely to be sentenced to jail or prison and are given longer prison sentences than Whites, but Hispanic youth are only penalized in the sentence to jail. Interaction analyses suggest that Black males are sentenced particularly harshly regardless of age, and the effects of race and ethnicity are conditioned by a violent, sex, or drug offense.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Théorêt, Bruno. "Enfance et détention correctionnelle. Le cas du tribunal des jeunes de Winnipeg entre 1930 et 1959." Criminologie 28, no. 1 (August 16, 2005): 119–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/017367ar.

Full text
Abstract:
In 1908, the first Canadian juvenile court was established in Winnipeg. The study of the functioning of this court during the period 1930-1959 shows that the judicial process and the sentencing decisions were in relation with two different approaches to delinquency. The first approach is the criminal one. Conceptually, this approach is close to the justice model, borrowed from adult courts which operate with retribution and deterrence. The second approach is the socio-penal approach. This approach is linked to the legal (and social) status of children characterized by the obligations of acceptable adult supervision, fixed place of residence, restrained presence in public places and sexual moralization. It includes types of delinquencies for which adults cannot be incriminated and delinquencies related to contacts with the Court. The sentencing of girls and boys whose files correspond to the criminal model is characterized by the recourse to fining, reprimand, probation and restitution while those whose files match the socio-penal model are punished by correctional detention, probation, release and fine.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sheeran, Alyssa M., and Amanda J. Heideman. "The Effects of Race and Ethnicity on Admission, Graduation, and Recidivism in the Milwaukee County Adult Drug Treatment Court." Social Sciences 10, no. 7 (July 8, 2021): 261. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci10070261.

Full text
Abstract:
Drug courts play a key role in the criminal justice system by diverting individuals from incarceration and providing them with resources to address substance use issues and reduce criminal recidivism. However, it is unclear whether drug courts reflect—or even exacerbate—preexisting racial/ethnic disparities in the criminal justice system. While prior literature has offered some insight into the influence of race and ethnicity on drug court success, much of the focus has been on outcomes (i.e., program completion and recidivism) rather than disparities at earlier stages (i.e., referral to admittance). The current study adds to this body of research by evaluating the Milwaukee County Adult Drug Treatment Court to examine whether racial/ethnic disparities exist at several stages of the drug court process: (1) referral to admittance, (2) likelihood of graduation, and (3) likelihood of recidivism. Results of the analyses determined racial/ethnic disparities in the likelihood of admission to the drug court, as well as the likelihood of graduation. There were no racial/ethnic disparities found in the likelihood of recidivism. The analyses also identified several additional variables that were influential in the likelihood of admission (risk score, prior record), likelihood of graduation (age, prior record, custody sanctions), and recidivism (drug court outcome).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hörnle, Tatjana. "Consensual Adult Incest." New Criminal Law Review 17, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 76–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.76.

Full text
Abstract:
Criminal prohibitions against incestuous acts, including sexual acts between adults, can be found in many, albeit not all, legal systems. But are such restrictions of individual liberty justifiable from the perspective of criminal law theory? The article starts with describing a prominent case (the Stuebing case) that gave rise to arguments put forward by the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights in defense of criminal norms that prohibit adult siblings from having sexual intercourse. However, these rulings are not convincing in the light of a consent-based approach to the criminalization of sexual conduct; such a consent-based model is advocated in the article. One can conceive of circumstances that shed doubt on the validity of consent even when both participants in an incestuous relationship are adults (if one person is the child of the other, or if sexual abuse is carried on that started during the childhood of one person). However, aside from such constellations, if both partners in a sexual encounter have given valid consent, a critical analysis must lead to the conclusion that criminal prohibitions are not bolstered by convincing reasons. Neither eugenic considerations, nor arguments pointing to the protection of families, nor the idea that morality or taboos ought to be protected survive critical analysis. Therefore, legislatures should consider redrafting too far-reaching incest prohibitions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fowler, Eric, and Megan C. Kurlychek. "Drawing the Line." Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 16, no. 3 (June 28, 2017): 263–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541204017708017.

Full text
Abstract:
Every state maintains some mechanism by which youths can be tried as adults in criminal courts. While scholars have long debated the inherent benefits or detriments of prosecuting youths as adults, empirical studies of actual outcomes have provided mixed findings and have been limited by problems of selection bias and jurisdictional differences in processing. The current research aims to further inform this literature by capitalizing on a policy change in Connecticut that raised the age of criminal responsibility from 16 to 17 on January 1, 2010, creating a natural experiment to assess the recidivism differences for youths based upon the system of processing: juvenile versus adult court. Findings from a 2-year follow-up reveal that 16-year-olds processed in juvenile courts had substantially reduced rates of recidivism with odds of rearrest that were between .462 and .630 less than for 16-year-olds processed in adult courts dependent on model specification.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

KURLYCHEK, MEGAN C., and BRIAN D. JOHNSON. "JUVENILITY AND PUNISHMENT: SENTENCING JUVENILES IN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT*." Criminology 48, no. 3 (August 17, 2010): 725–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00200.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Tzeferakos, G., M. Papaliaga, C. Papageorgiou, P. Bali, and A. Douzenis. "Criminal insanity and psychiatric diagnoses in Greek penal cases." European Psychiatry 41, S1 (April 2017): S593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.911.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionTo our knowledge, few studies address the issue of criminal responsibility among psychiatric offenders. In Greece, articles 34 and 36 of the penal code regulate criminal insanity and diminished responsibility, respectively.ObjectivesThe objective of the present study was to provide psychiatric/legal data considering the appeal to articles 34/36 of the Greek penal code.MethodsLegal case files of 100 adult subjects, 90 male/10 female, 88 Greeks/12 foreigners were examined.ResultsAccording to the first degree court, one defendant was found criminally insane, 29 with partial responsibility, while the rest were regarded as fully capable. The decisions of the court of appeal/the supreme court of appeal were 2 criminally insane, 36 partially responsible and 62, fully criminally responsible. The decisions were unanimous in 78% of the cases.The most common diagnoses were schizophrenia spectrum psychosis (18%), antisocial/borderline/mixed personality disorder (15%) and substance use disorder (15%). Court decisions of criminal insanity/diminished responsibility were higher when the perpetrator had an Axis I diagnosis (47.5%), significantly lower in cases of personality disorder (22.2%) and even lower in cases of substance use disorder (16.7%). In patients with prior hospitalizations the percentage of criminal insanity/diminished responsibility was 55.6%, significantly higher than in cases without (24.4%).ConclusionsSchizophrenia is the most common mental disorder correlated with offenders criminally insane/partially responsible, while a history of psychiatric hospitalization is a very strong positive predictive factor for the successful appeal of the aforementioned articles.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Adult criminal court"

1

Miner-Romanoff, Karen. "Incarcerated adults sentenced in adult criminal court while juveniles: Knowledge, understanding, and perceptions of their sentences." ScholarWorks, 2010. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/794.

Full text
Abstract:
An estimated 200,000 juveniles are tried as adults yearly and receive punitive sentences intended to deter juvenile crime and increase public safety. Few qualitative studies on juveniles sentenced as adults and contradictory results indicate a need for further research. This study used a qualitative, phenomenological interpretive design, with the conceptual frameworks of general and specific deterrence and rational choice theories. In-depth interviews took place with 12 incarcerated adults serving sentences (24--540 months) for juvenile crimes. The research questions explored their knowledge of transfer laws and adult sentencing and perceptions of deterrence from future criminal activity. Coding of transcripts and audio files was distilled into meaning units following the hermeneutical tradition, and triangulation was used to identify overarching themes and patterns. Findings revealed that no participants understood application of transfer to adult court to them, and 10 (83%) revealed ignorance of juvenile transfer laws. Thus, they did not weigh costs or benefits prior to offending (general deterrence) or exercise rational decision making; however, 11 (92%) would have reconsidered offending if they were aware of adult sentences. Half admitted the impacts of incarceration would not deter them from future offending (no specific deterrence), and half believed negative factors would prevent recidivism. Study results can prompt further research in juvenile offenders' knowledge and decisions regarding adult sentencing. Implications for social change include dissemination of findings to deter adolescents from criminal behavior. Findings may also aid policymakers' reevaluation and revision of sentencing policies for juvenile offenders to help prevent juvenile crime and recidivism and increase public safety.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tidball, Marie. "The governance of adult defendants with autism through English criminal justice policy and criminal court practice." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:7004f680-cd56-4a62-a097-458878d19f7a.

Full text
Abstract:
Foucault's 'governmentality approach' developed the notion of 'dividing practices' (1991; see Seddon 2007) which recognises that how individuals and groups are categorised determines how they are governed. This thesis draws on critical disability studies and criminological literature on 'doing justice to difference' to develop a disability perspective in criminology, in order to analyse the governance of offenders with autism. It argues that there is descriptive and normative value in proactively categorising these groups as 'disabled' under the 'social model' of disability. The social model of disability is helpful in enabling us to distinguish between impairment and disablement. It allows us to comprehend the 'psy' literature, which explores the link between the 'symptomatology' of autism and criminality (the 'impairment branch' of the distinction) in combination with the 'interconnecting variables' (Browning and Caulfield, 2011) which lead offenders with autism into the criminal justice system and their inequitable experiences (the 'disablement branch' of the distinction). This is timely given the entrenchment of this model in the Equality Act 2010 and the inception of the Autism Act 2009, Statutory Guidance (DOH, 2010; 2015) and related policy. Using cross-method triangulation of qualitative data collected through interviews with elites and practitioners, textual analysis and court observation of eight adult defendants with autism through their court process, this thesis investigates why the status of this group as disabled under the Equality Act 2010 has been overlooked in criminal justice policy and criminal court decision-making. It examines the extent to which policy-makers and criminal justice decision-makers consider the defendant's autism in their decision-making about the defendant's case in the courts. Finally, it examines the impact of 'collateral' effects of the criminal justice process on family members who supported these defendants.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

King, Robin. "TRANSFERRING JUVENILES TO THE ADULT COURT: A FACTORIAL SURVEY OF FLORIDA PROSECUTORS." Doctoral diss., University of Central Florida, 2006. http://digital.library.ucf.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ETD/id/3920.

Full text
Abstract:
Prosecutors have enormous discretion in the criminal justice system. Their decisions can ultimately impact and shape the course of the lives of the offenders whom they prosecute. This is certainly true for juvenile offenders considered for transfer to the adult court. Previous research indicates that serious, violent offenders are the most likely to be transferred to the adult court. However, very little is known on prosecutors' views of the role of the juvenile court, the process of transfer or the facts that influence their decision to transfer a juvenile to the adult court. A statewide survey of 800 Florida prosecutors was implemented using factorial vignettes. The results indicate that prosecutors support the idea of transfer generally, particularly when they are making the final determination to transfer to the adult court. Further, prosecutors indicate that juvenile transfer should be used sparingly, in extreme cases that are not appropriate to the resources of the juvenile court. The data were also examined to determine the effect of juvenile offender and juvenile offense characteristics on the decision to transfer a juvenile to the adult court. Analysis revealed several significant predictors of preference for transfer: age, threat to society, presence of a violent offense, ethnicity of juvenile, presence of prior adjudications, and amenability to treatment.
Ph.D.
Other
Health and Public Affairs
Public Affairs: Ph.D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

McClure, Craig S. "Seeking Justice: Examining Adult Offender Reentry Court Partnerships from a Policy Implementation Perspective." Connect to this document online, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=miami1127948252.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Miami University, Dept. of Political Science, 2005.
Title from second page of PDF document. Document formatted into pages; contains [2], x, 163 p. Includes bibliographical references (p. 140-163).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Masri, David N. "A Correlational Analysis of Secondary Data for Factors Influencing Graduation from Adult Drug Court." VCU Scholars Compass, 2016. http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4456.

Full text
Abstract:
The proliferation of drug courts throughout the world over the last two decades presents an opportunity and a challenge. The drug court approach involves a combination of treatment and judicial supervision which is a diversion from incarceration and/or ‘traditional’ criminal justice supervision. Despite widespread study of drug courts, there is much that researchers still do not know and there is still controversy as to how and why drug courts work. This research study is an examination of secondary data from an urban, mid-Atlantic drug court to attempt to correlate factors that contribute to success (as defined by graduation) in drug court. This study examines drug courts using Life Course Theory, Social Capital Theory and Recovery Capital Theory as a theoretical foundation for understanding the influences of drug courts on participants. Findings from the Discriminant Function Analysis employed in this study demonstrate low to moderate ability to predict drug court graduation and program attrition based on a combination of demographic information and drug court program requirements. Among the factors found to contribute to drug court success were participants having children, their employment status, 30-day abstinence, age, and race. Additional implications for social workers practicing in drug courts are discussed as well as suggestions for future research directions in the study of drug courts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kukino, Sarah E. S. "Juvenile Transfer to Adult Criminal Court: Why Transfer is Not the Best Method in Addressing Juvenile Delinquency." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2015. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1042.

Full text
Abstract:
Reducing juvenile delinquency is an important issue because today’s juvenile population will become the next generation of contributing members to society. Therefore, the juvenile justice system is faced with the challenge of creating effective methods of decreasing delinquency and providing necessary treatment to juvenile offenders. Legislators implemented juvenile transfer to adult criminal court with the intent of increasing punishments in order to deter future juvenile crime and to hold juvenile offenders accountable for their criminal behavior. This paper shows why juvenile transfer is not an effective method in addressing the issues of juvenile delinquency by looking at several studies that analyze the negative effects of transfer in increasing recidivism and serious violent crimes. Furthermore, research shows that juvenile transfer undermines the criminal culpability of juvenile offenders who are undoubtedly not as mature and psychosocially developed as adult offenders. This implies that the juvenile justice system is faced with the ongoing challenge of finding new ways to address juvenile delinquency. This paper suggests that the juvenile justice system should return to an individualized rehabilitative system that focuses on the needs of individual offenders in providing appropriate treatment and services that will allow the juvenile to re-integrate back into the community.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Holbrook, Ashley Michelle. "Juveniles Adjudicated in Adult Court: The Effects of Age, Gender, Race, Previous Convictions, and Severity of Crime on Sentencing Decisions." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2007. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2043.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to analyze the influences such as age at current offense, gender, race, previous convictions, and the seriousness of crimes that contributed to the decisions received by juveniles in adult court. This study examined a secondary data set from the United States Department of Justice entitled Juvenile Defendants in Criminal Courts (JDCC): Survey of 40 Counties in the United States, 1998. The cases from these 40 jurisdictions represented all filings during one month in 75 of the most populous counties. The current study found significant differences among race, prior criminal history, current offense severity, and juveniles adjudicated in adult court. Future research should therefore continue to examine the impact of juveniles adjudicated in adult court to better inform the debate surrounding the potential dangers associated with juvenile offending and adult criminal sanctions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Letsoalo, Lisbeth Ledile. "The protection of children's identities in the criminal justice system: an analysis on section 154(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977." Thesis, University of Limpopo, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/3046.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis ( LLM.) --University of Limpopo, 2019
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 provides that a child’s best interests should be of primary consideration in any matter concerning him or her. Contrary to this value, and thereby excluding protection of child victims, section 154(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 simply focusses on anonymity protection of child offenders and witness involved in criminal proceedings. It currently expressly prohibits the publication of the identities of child offenders and witnesses when the media makes publications on the relevant criminal proceedings. However, this protection terminates once such child offenders and witnesses attain majority, therefore arbitrarily stripping them of the identity protection. As a result, media houses are not only at liberty to publish on criminal proceedings identifying child victims, but also to expose the identities of child offenders and witnesses upon attaining majority. Such publications have proved to impede on children’s rights, as well as to contribute to the psychological challenges faced by the children whenever they are exposed to the criminal justice system. In this study the constitutional validity of section 154(3) is investigated and it is argued that it is unconstitutional in all respects. The section contradicts the specific right afforded to all children in the Bill of Rights, as well as other ancillary rights, which ought to ensure the progressive realisation of the protection afforded in terms of section 154(3). It is recommended, firstly, that section 154(3) be declared unconstitutional, and be amended to include child victims within the ambit of its protection. Secondly, the protection should extend beyond the age of 18, in respect of all children involved in criminal proceedings.
National Research Foundation
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Pinero, Veronica B. "Transformations in the Canadian Youth Justice System. Creation of Statutes and the Judicial Waiver in Quebec." Thèse, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/24065.

Full text
Abstract:
The objectives of this thesis were to observe how the Canadian youth justice system has dealt with the regulation of the transfer of young offenders to the adult court and how the Canadian statutes have regulated the imposition of adult offences for young offenders. For this, I drew a distinction between two levels of observation: first, I observed the process of "creation of statutes" by the political system. Second, I observed the process of "understanding and interpretation of statutes" by the judicial system. The notion of "political system" includes the legislation enacted by Parliament, parliamentary debates, and reports published by the Government of Canada. The notion of "judicial system" includes the decisions of the Montreal Youth Court. For the first level of observation ("creation of statutes"), I observed and analyzed the work of the political system for the period 1842 to 2012. Starting in 1857, many statutes regulated different aspects of the criminal law system as it applied to young people. The first statute to deal with youth offenders comprehensively and different from adult offenders was the Juvenile Delinquents Act (1908); this statute was replaced by the Young Offenders Act (1982). The current statute is the Youth Criminal Justice Act (2002). With regard to the Juvenile Delinquents Act (1908) and the Young Offenders Act (1982), I observed how the political system regulated the mechanism of transferring a young person to the adult court. This mechanism allowed the youth court to decide a question of jurisdiction: whether the young person would be processed and sentenced within the youth justice system, or whether the young person would be sent to the adult court for him to be dealt with and sentenced therein. With regard to the Youth Criminal Justice Act (2002), I observed how the political system has regulated the imposition of adult sentences by the youth court. This statute replaced the mechanism of transfer under the two previous statutes by the imposition of adult sentences within the youth justice system. For the second level of observation ("the understanding and interpretation of statutes"), I observed how the Montreal Youth Court had understood and interpreted the statutory provision that allowed the youth court to transfer a young person to the adult court for the young person to be dealt with and sentenced therein. My period of observation is from 1911 to 1995. I argue that both the political and the judicial systems have been strongly influenced by the theories of deterrence, denunciation, retribution, and rehabilitation. The influence that each theory has exercised on each system varies. The political system, originally focused on the rehabilitation of young people, has been slowly “contaminated” by the most punitive theories, such as deterrence and denunciation. This shift started in the 70’s and slowly increased over the years. Conversely, while the judicial system does not seem to have been originally influenced by the theories of rehabilitation, its focus has slowly shifted towards this objective as the primary goal of their intervention towards young offenders since the 70’s. However, the “successful rehabilitation” of a young person has become a goal in itself, where “unsuccessful offenders” have been transferred to the adult court and dealt with the adult punitive justice system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Canale, Laura Ann. "Prosecuting Children as Adults: How do Juvenile Court Judges Decide Who Should Face that Fate?" Youngstown State University / OhioLINK, 2010. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1296415940.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Adult criminal court"

1

Statistics, Canada Statistics Canada Canadian Centre for Justice. Adult criminal court caseload trends, 1992-93 to 1994-95. Ottawa: The Centre, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Stageberg, Paul. Final report on the Polk County Adult Drug Court. Des Moines, Iowa]: Dept. of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gainsborough, Jenni. Prosecuting juveniles in adult court: An assessment of trends and consequences. Washington, D.C: Sentencing Project, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Males, Mike A. The color of justice: An analysis of juvenile adult court transfers in California. San Francisco, CA: Justice Policy Institute, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Stanton, Sharon. Improved justice for survivors of sexual violence?: Adult survivors' experiences of the Wynberg Sexual Offences Court and associated services. [Cape Town]: Rape Crisis Cape Town, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

1961-, Ruddell Rick, ed. Do the crime, do the time: Juvenile criminals and adult justice in the American court system. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Birkenmayer, Andrew C. Sentencing in adult provincial courts: A study of nine jurisdictions: 1993 and 1994. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics., ed. Sentencing in adult criminal provincial courts: A study of six Canadian jurisdictions, 1991 and 1992. [Ottawa, Ont.]: Statistics Canada, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Griffin, Patrick. Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions : report. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Canada. Statistics Canada. Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Sentencing in adult provincial courts: A study of nine jurisdictions 1993 and 1994. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Adult criminal court"

1

Tracy, Paul E., and Kimberly Kempf-Leonard. "Predicting Adult Crime Status from Delinquency, Age, Frequency, and Court Dispositions." In Continuity and Discontinuity in Criminal Careers, 109–41. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9844-9_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Marlowe, Douglas B. "Adult and Juvenile Drug Courts." In Handbook of Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Treatment in Criminal Justice Settings, 123–42. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9470-7_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"6 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN YOUTH COURT AND ADULT MAGISTRATES’ COURT." In Criminal Litigation & Sentencing, 382–84. Routledge-Cavendish, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843140047-79.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hannibal, Martin, and Lisa Mountford. "25. Prosecuting Young Offenders." In Criminal Litigation, 475–91. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192844286.003.0025.

Full text
Abstract:
Where a prosecution is commenced against a child aged 10 to 13 years or against a young person aged 14 to 17 years, the general rule is that he will be tried and sentenced in the youth court. The youth court adopts more informal and less adversarial procedures to deal with the needs and vulnerabilities of young defendants. However, there are exceptional situations (grave offences and dangerous offenders) where they will be tried in the Crown Court or when jointly charged with an adult sometimes in the adult magistrates’ court. This chapter discusses the rules for deciding where a young person is to be tried; the rules for trying a young person in the Crown Court; the rules for trying a young person in the adult magistrates’ court; the young defendant’s right to court bail; and the procedure in the youth court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"11. Transferring Children to Adult Criminal Court." In When Kids Get Arrested, 127–36. Rutgers University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36019/9780813548180-015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hannibal, Martin, and Lisa Mountford. "25. Prosecuting Young Offenders." In Criminal Litigation 2019-2020, 467–82. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198838548.003.0025.

Full text
Abstract:
Where a prosecution is commenced against a child aged 10 to 13 years or against a young person aged 14 to 17 years, the general rule is that he will be tried and sentenced in the youth court. The youth court adopts more informal and less adversarial procedures to deal with the needs and vulnerabilities of young defendants. However, there are exceptional situations (grave offences and dangerous offenders) where they will be tried in the Crown Court or when jointly charged with an adult sometimes in the adult magistrates’ court. This chapter discusses the rules for deciding where a young person is to be tried; the rules for trying a young person in the Crown Court; the rules for trying a young person in the adult magistrates’ court; the young defendant’s right to court bail; and the procedure in the youth court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hannibal, Martin, and Lisa Mountford. "25. Prosecuting Young Offenders." In Criminal Litigation 2020-2021, 471–86. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198858423.003.0025.

Full text
Abstract:
Where a prosecution is commenced against a child aged 10 to 13 years or against a young person aged 14 to 17 years, the general rule is that he will be tried and sentenced in the youth court. The youth court adopts more informal and less adversarial procedures to deal with the needs and vulnerabilities of young defendants. However, there are exceptional situations (grave offences and dangerous offenders) where they will be tried in the Crown Court or when jointly charged with an adult sometimes in the adult magistrates’ court. This chapter discusses the rules for deciding where a young person is to be tried; the rules for trying a young person in the Crown Court; the rules for trying a young person in the adult magistrates’ court; the young defendant’s right to court bail; and the procedure in the youth court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hannibal, Martin, and Lisa Mountford. "26. Sentencing Young Offenders." In Criminal Litigation, 492–509. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192844286.003.0026.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter considers the range of disposals available where a young offender admits the offence(s) or a finding of guilt is recorded against him. It discusses the principles which guide the sentencing of youths; the youth court’s sentencing powers; the adult magistrates’ court sentencing powers; the Crown Court’s sentencing powers; and sentencing a ‘dangerous’ young offender.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sprack, John, and Michael Engelhardt–Sprack. "Trial of Juveniles." In A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843566.003.0014.

Full text
Abstract:
A juvenile is normally tried by magistrates in a special form of magistrates’ court, known as the ‘youth court’. In the circumstances described below, it is either obligatory or possible for a juvenile to be tried on indictment (see 11.04 to 11.15) or in the adult magistrates’ court (see 11.17 to 11.18). In all other cases, he must stay in the youth court, even if the offence charged is one which, if he were an adult, either could or would have to be tried on indictment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ward, Adrian, and Dmitri Bartenev. "Russia." In The International Protection of Adults. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780198727255.003.0053.

Full text
Abstract:
Russia is a civil law country. It is a federation of constituent entities (‘entities’). Laws affecting adults are made mainly at the federal level. Entities have very limited powers in this regard, such as defining the structure of public agencies responsible for implementing federal standards. The judicial system comprises courts of general jurisdiction (which hear both civil and criminal cases), commercial courts, the federal constitutional court, and (in some entities) regional constitutional courts. Courts of first instance are justice of the peace, district, and regional courts. The highest court with general jurisdiction is the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. District courts hear most adult protection cases, for which there are no special tribunals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Adult criminal court"

1

Aziz Sadiq Kasnazany, Taib. "Prosecute and punish the perpetrators of sexual violence against Yazidis as a crime against humanity, even the possible genocide committed by ISIS." In Peacebuilding and Genocide Prevention. University of Human Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/uhdicpgp/61.

Full text
Abstract:
"Abstract On the 3rd of August 2014, ISIS fighters attacked the Sinjar region in northern of Iraq, mostly populated by Yazidis, a religious minority. In almost 3 days, most of the villages in the region were vacated and their residents captured. These events mark the beginning of a campaign of extreme violence that has left men and women apart. Adult men were massacred while girls and women were held for sale as sex slaves. More than 7 years after these events, no prosecution has been brought by International Criminal Court. States are unwilling to try their nationals guilty of crimes of genocide against the Yazidis. This paper aims to analyze the genocide of the Yazidis from the perspective of sexual violence and in particular to determine whether it can be considered to the status of genocide. The origins and legal sources of the genocide are first analyzed. This violence is then examined in the light of certain elements constituting the crime of genocide. Finally, the challenges to be met in the fight against impunity in International Criminal Court are mentioned in the conclusion."
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Psycho-Behavioral and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Juvenile Delinquency in Wasit Province at 2016 To 2020." In 4th International Conference on Biological & Health Sciences (CIC-BIOHS’2022). Cihan University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24086/biohs2022/paper.766.

Full text
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: one of the serious behavioral problems that affect youth health mentally, physically and socially is Juvenile delinquency. The act by a juvenile is considered delinquency if it is considered a crime when committed by an adult, as well as illegal acts because of offenders age.OBJECTIVE: Is to determine the psycho-behavioral and socio-economic profile of juvenile offenders in Wasit Province. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional hospital-based study targeted all delinquents (n=510) who referred by criminal courts to psychiatric unit for personality study using ICD-10 clinical based interview during 2016 to 2020. Data collected from files of offenders by a routine interviewing (with highly secured information). RESULTS: The mean age ±SD of the indicted was 17.9±2.9 years, male youths consist 96%, with a history of low socioeconomic status, 74% of them lived within family size of ≥7 members; 50% rank in 1st. to 3rd. in among all siblings in their families; 17% losses their fathers. Of total sample, one-half of offenders presented with school dropout and 44% engaged in premature labor. Most of youth presented with good mental health, sometimes they appear with consistent personality only 19 (4%) of them presented with speech and movement disorder, and unstable and uncooperative personality. Of 290 delinquents; 108 (37%) were tobacco smoker and 43 (15%) presented with tattoo. Dropout offenders presented with fourfold smoking and tattoo than students with an Odds Ratios of 3.8 (95% CI 2.25-6.4), and 4.0 (95% CI 1.9-8.7) respectively. 5% of youths have a history of previous offence. (38%) of offenders accused with theft or robbery crimes followed by homicide (16%) and physical fighting or scrimmage (12%). CONCLUSIONS: According to the psychiatric interview, the majority of the indicted were not mentally ill. Low socioeconomic status, live in large family, losses fathers, school dropout, and premature work all these factors may contribute to increase the burden of juvenile delinquency in Wasit province. The prevalence of healthy risk behavior in school dropout delinquents more than in students. Theft and robbery, homicide and physical fighting as a crimes were on the top of the list. Educational and health programs that encourage children to enrolled school and increase awareness of negative impact of juvenile delinquency on individual and community should be considered urgently.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography