Journal articles on the topic '1894-1941'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: 1894-1941.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic '1894-1941.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Mandelshtam, M. Yu. "New synonymies and new combinations in Scolytidae from the Kuril Archipelago and continental territories of the Russian Far East (Coleoptera)." Zoosystematica Rossica 15, no. 2 (March 2, 2007): 323–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.31610/zsr/2006.15.2.323.

Full text
Abstract:
Hypothenemus corni Kurenzov, 1941 and H. insularum Krivolutskaya, 1968 are transferred to Ernoporicus (new combinations) and the following new synonymies are established: Ernoporicus insularum (Krivolutskaya, 1968) = Ericryphalus elongatus Nobuchi, 1975; Cryphalus rhusii Niisima, 1909 = C. kurilensis Krivolutskaya, 1968; Xyleborus seriatus Blandford, 1894 = X. orientalis Eggers, 1933. Lectotypes of H. corni Kurenzov, 1941 and X. seriatus Blandford, 1894 are designated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Falck, P., L. Aaarvik, and A. Vives Moreno. "New data on Old World Polyorthini. The genus Lopharcha Diakonoff, 1941 recorded from the Canary Islands (Spain) and Tanzania (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)." SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología 50, no. 197 (March 30, 2022): 105–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.57065/shilap.197.

Full text
Abstract:
Dichelia constanti Rebel, 1894 is transferred to the genus Lopharcha Diakonoff, 1941 resulting in the combination Lopharcha constanti (Rebel, 1894) comb. n. Lopharcha africana Aarvik, sp. n. is described from Tanzania. Kanaria Larsen, 2020 is synonymized with Lopharcha Diakonoff, 1941, syn. n. These are the first records of Lopharcha from the Afrotropical region and the western part of the Palaearctic region.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Falck, P., L. Aarvik, and A. Vives Moreno. "New data on Old World Polyorthini. The genus Lopharcha Diakonoff, 1941 recorded from the Canary Islands (Spain) and Tanzania (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)." SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología 50, no. 197 (March 30, 2022): 105–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.57065/shilap.218.

Full text
Abstract:
Dichelia constanti Rebel, 1894 is transferred to the genus Lopharcha Diakonoff, 1941 resulting in the combination Lopharcha constanti (Rebel, 1894) comb. n. Lopharcha africana Aarvik, sp. n. is described from Tanzania. Kanaria Larsen, 2020 is synonymized with Lopharcha Diakonoff, 1941, syn. n. These are the first records of Lopharcha from the Afrotropical region and the western part of the Palaearctic region.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Mandelshtam, M. Yu, and A. V. Petrov. "Notes on Oriental Scolytus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)." Zoosystematica Rossica 25, no. 2 (December 27, 2016): 295–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.31610/zsr/2016.25.2.295.

Full text
Abstract:
New synonymies in the genus Scolytus Geoffroy, 1762 are established: S. koltzei Reitter, 1894 = S. yablonianus Murayama, 1943 = S. shanhaiensis Yin et Huang, 1980; S. ventrosus Schevyrew, 1890 = S. trispinosus Strohmeyer, 1908. Scolytus kononovi Kurentsov, 1941 is justified as a distinct species from S. semenovi (Spessivtsev, 1919). The synonymy of S. formosanus Eggers, 1939 with S. frontalis Blandford, 1894 is confirmed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Wees, William C. (William Charles). "Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film 1894–1941 (review)." Moving Image 7, no. 1 (2007): 177–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mov.2007.0033.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lee, Chi-Feng, Ming-Yao Chiang, Michael F. Geiser, and Kuo-Hung Chuang. "The genus Nisotra Baly, 1864 (Coleoptera, Chrysomeliae, Galerucinae, Alticini) in Taiwan, with redescriptions of four Asian species and notes on the immature stages of N. gemella (Erichson, 1834)." ZooKeys 1205 (July 1, 2024): 299–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1205.121928.

Full text
Abstract:
Nisotra chrysomeloides Jacoby, 1885, N. dohertyi (Maulik, 1926), N. gemella (Erichson, 1834), and Nisotra nigripes Jacoby, 1894 are redescribed with illustrations of aedeagi, antennae, gonocoxae, abdominal ventrite VIII, and spermathecae. Nisotra nigripes is recorded for the first time from Taiwan. The immature stages and life history of N. gemella were studied in the laboratory using a novel rearing design. Four synonyms previously proposed are confirmed: Sphaeroderma javana de Motschulsky, 1866, S. orbiculata de Motschulsky, 1866, Nisotra bowringi Baly, 1876, and Podagrica hibisci Bryant, 1941 with N. gemella (Erichson, 1834). Lectotypes are designated for Haltica gemella Erichson, 1834, N. chrysomeloides Jacoby, 1885, N. bowringi Baly, 1876, and Podagrica hibisci Bryant, 1941.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

BOTERO, JUAN PABLO, and ANTONIO SANTOS-SILVA. "Four new species, taxonomic, and nomenclatural notes in Hammatoderus Gemminger & Harold, 1873 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae)." Zootaxa 4231, no. 3 (February 12, 2017): 377. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4231.3.5.

Full text
Abstract:
Plagiohammus Dillon & Dillon, 1941 is considered a junior synonym of Hammatoderus Gemminger & Harold, 1873. Four new species are described: Hammatoderus juliae, from Colombia; H. migueli and H. antonkozlovi, from Ecuador; and H. lingafelteri, from Mexico. Hammoderus spinipennis Thomson, 1860, and Hammoderus quadriplagiatus Breuning, 1943 are placed as junior synonyms of Hammoderus thoracicus White, 1858 (= Hammatoderus thoracicus). Consequently, Hammatoderus jacobyi Nonfried, 1894, synonym of H. spinipennis, is also a junior synonym of H. thoracicus. The synonymy between Hammoderus strandi Breuning, 1943 and Plagiohammus olivescens Dillon & Dillon, 1941 is formally established. Plagiohammus mexicanus Breuning, 1950 is provisionally transferred to Monochamus Dejean, 1821, and the type locality is questioned. Eight types are figured for the first time: Plagiohammus strandi; Plagiohammus mexicanus; Plagiohammus confusor Dillon & Dillon, 1941; Hammoderus spinipennis; Hammoderus quadriplagiatus; Hammoderus inermis (Thomson, 1857); Hammoderus sallei (Thomson, 1860); Hammoderus lacordairei (Thomson, 1860).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rodrigues, Juliana Mourão dos Santos, Antonin Jean Johan Crumière, William Toubiana, Abderrahman Khila, and Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo Moreira. "New species and new records of semiaquatic bugs (Arthropoda, Insecta, Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Gerromorpha) from French Guiana." ZooKeys 1126 (November 1, 2022): 155–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1126.94545.

Full text
Abstract:
Semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) are predatory insects that occupy a wide range of freshwater and marine habitats, with some secondary transitions to terrestrial life. They currently represent more than 2100 species distributed through all continents, except for Antarctica, and are especially rich in the Neotropical and Oriental regions. Although the fauna from the former region is relatively well known, some areas remain almost unexplored. Such is the case of French Guiana, where only a few species have been previously recorded, several of which based on collections made in the 19th and early 20th centuries. As a result of material recently collected in the territory, the descriptions of Rhagovelia depressa Rodrigues, Khila & Moreira, sp. nov., R. tantilloides Rodrigues, Khila & Moreira, sp. nov. and Steinovelia vittata Rodrigues, Khila & Moreira, sp. nov. (Veliidae) are presented here. New records for 28 species are also provided, of which Cylindrostethus hungerfordi Drake & Harris, 1934, Neogerris magnus (Kuitert, 1942), Rheumatobates mangrovensis (China, 1943), R. trinitatis (China, 1943), Ovatametra obesa Kenaga, 1942, Telmatometra fusca Kenaga, 1941, T. parva Kenaga, 1941 (Gerridae), Mesovelia amoena Uhler, 1894 (Mesoveliidae), Rhagovelia brunae Magalhães & Moreira, 2016, R. elegans Uhler, 1894, R. ephydros (Drake & Van Doesburg, 1966), R. equatoria D. Polhemus, 1997, R. evidis Bacon, 1948, R. guianana D. Polhemus, 1997, R. tenuipes Champion, 1898, Oiovelia cunucunumana (Drake & Maldonado-Capriles, 1952), Stridulivelia alia (Drake, 1957), S. stridulata (Hungerford, 1929), and S. tersa (Drake & Harris, 1941) (Veliidae) are reported from French Guiana for the first time.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Julietta I, Meskhidze. "About the object collection of the Kunstkamera from Upper Balkaria of Nikolai Adolfovich Bush." Kavkazologiya 2023, no. 3 (September 30, 2023): 220–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.31143/2542-212x-2023-3-220-250.

Full text
Abstract:
Valuable components of the Kunstkamera’s museum collection are two sets donated by Academician Nikolai A. Bush (1869–1941). They are organically connected with the personal biography of this famous St. Petersburg and Leningrad scientist – botanist and florist, geographer and glaciologist, researcher of the glaciers of the Western and Central Caucasus, who made his first Caucasian journey in 1894, and in 1939 the last one. The article deals with one of the collections that arrived at the museum in November 1927 and contains wooden objects from Upper Balkaria: household utensils and agricultural implements. The small collection allows revealing some features of the home life and wooden crafts of the inhabitants of the largest of the five Balkarian societies in a broad historical-cultural context.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Burtey, S., V. Vidal, and Y. Berland. "An unusual renal colic: A tribute to Joseph Hyrtl (1810–1894) and Max Brödel (1870–1941)." Kidney International 71, no. 4 (February 2007): 281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5001986.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Rigal-Aragón, Margarita, and Fernando González-Moreno. "“A man must laugh, or die”: Visual Interpretations of Poe’s Comical and Parodical Tales." Edgar Allan Poe Review 22, no. 1 (June 1, 2021): 30–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/edgallpoerev.22.1.30.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract A brief overview of Poe’s most iconic illustrated editions shows that the humorous and satirical features of his texts have called the attention of fewer editors and artists than the aspects of the beautiful, the sublime, the arabesque, the grotesque, the macabre, and so forth. Here we review many of the freshest and liveliest interpretations in which parody is put forward, using as a reference some exceptional visual renderings that also display the likes of times and places. The early interpretations provided by artists such as Church (1884), Sterner (1894–95), or Coburn (1902); later on by Servolini (1929), Rackham (1935), Bofa (1941), Eichenberg (1944), or Dubout (1948); in the second part of the twentieth century by Calsina (1971); and very recently by Grimly (2004, 2009) prove that the parodical side of Poe’s oeuvre mattered and still matters.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Ábrahám, Levente, and Matthieu Giacomino. "A little known and synonym ant-lions 2. (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae)." Natura Somogyiensis 34 (2020): 21–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.24394/natsom.2020.34.21.

Full text
Abstract:
The authors examined antlion types in several collections and, as a result, 44 new synonymous names were found and 8 new combinations were established. Label data of the type specimens, distribution and some taxonomical comments were published. Acanthaclisis aurora Klapálek, 1912 n. syn. of Phanoclisis longicollis (Rambur, 1842); Creoleon pallida Fraser, 1950 n. syn. of Nohoveus lepidus (Klug in Ehrenberg, 1834); Myrmeleon tschernovi Krivokhatsky, N. A., Shapoval & A. P. Shapoval, 2014 n. syn. of Myrmeleon bore (Tjeder, 1941); Myrmeleon montanus Navás, 1914 n. syn. of Myrmeleon trivialis Gerstaecker, 1885; Cueta elongata Navás, 1914 n. syn. of Cueta divisa Navás, 1912; Cueta externa Navás, 1914 n. syn. of Cueta indefinita Navás, 1914; Cueta gracilis Navás, 1924 n. syn. of Cueta indefinita Navás, 1914; Cueta simplicior Navás, 1934 n. syn. of Cueta indefinita Navás, 1914; Cueta pilosa Navás, 1934 n. syn. of Cueta indefinita Navás, 1914; Nesoleon scalaris Navás, 1912 n. syn. of Cueta pallens (Klug in Ehrenberg, 1834). "Nesoleon lepidus Klug." is a wrong combination (Banks 1913) and not extant species. Cueta dissimulata Navás, 1913 n. syn. of Cueta trivirgata (Gerstaecker, 1894); Dendroleon qiongana Yang, 2002 n. syn. of Gatzara caelestis (Krivokhatsky, 1997); Dendroleon angulineura C.-k. Yang, 1987 n. syn. of Gatzara jubilaea Navás, 1915; Myrmeleon contractus Walker, 1860 n. comb. of Layahima contracta (Walker, 1860); Layahima nebulosa Navás, 1912 n. syn. of Layahima contracta (Walker, 1860); Distoleon cubitalis (Navás, 1914) n. comb. of Banyutus cubitalis (Navás, 1914); Formicaleo feai Navás, 1915 n. syn. of Banyutus cubitalis (Navás, 1914); Cymatala pallora C.-k. Yang, 1986 n. comb. of Banyutus pallorus (C.-k. Yang, 1986) and n. syn. of Banyutus cubitalis (Navás, 1914); Creoleon maurus Navás, 1923 n. syn. of Creoleon lugdunensis (Villers, 1789); Creagris interrupta Navás, 1914 n. syn. of Creoleon mortifer (Walker, 1853); Creagris loanguana Navás, 1913 n. syn. of Creoleon mortifer (Walker, 1853); Creoleon nigritarsis Navás, 1921 n. syn. of Creoleon mortifer (Walker, 1853); Creagris venosus Navás, 1914 n. syn. of Creoleon mortifer (Walker, 1853); Neeles roscidus Navás, 1937 n. comb. of Distoleon roscidus (Navás, 1937) and n. syn. of Distoleon nefandus (Walker, 1853); Distoleon symphineurus C.-k. Yang, 1986 n. syn. of Distoleon solitarius (Hölzel, 1970); Macronemurus interruptus Kolbe, 1897 n. syn. of Distoleon sylphis (Gerstaecker, 1894); Formicaleo turbidus Navás, 1915 n. syn. of Distoleon sylphis (Gerstaecker, 1894); Formicaleo lambarenus Navás, 1921 n. syn. of Distoleon sylphis (Gerstaecker, 1894); Formicaleo gilsi Navás, 1933 n. syn. of Distoleon sylphis (Gerstaecker, 1894); Neeles muzanus Navás, 1922 n. comb. of Distoleon muzanus (Navás, 1922) and n. syn. of Distoleon sylphis (Gerstaecker, 1894); Feina languidus Navás, 1931 n. syn. of Distoleon tholloni (Navás, 1914); Neuroleon parvissimus Fraser, 1952 n. syn. of Geyria lepidula (Navás, 1912); Formicaleo dumontinus Navás, 1933 n. comb. of Macronemurus dumontinus (Navás, 1933) and n. syn. of Macronemurus appendiculatus (Latreille, 1807); Macronemurus schoutedeni Navás, 1930 n. syn. of Macronemurus loranthe Banks, 1911; Macronemurus jejunus Navás, 1912 n. syn. of Macronemurus melanthe Banks, 1911; Macronemurus ianthe Banks, 1911 n. syn. of Macronemurus perlatus (Gerstaecker, 1885); Macronemurus nuncius Navás, 1913 n. syn. of Macronemurus perlatus (Gerstaecker, 1885); Formicoleo fictus Navás, 1913 n. syn. of Macronemurus perlatus (Gerstaecker, 1885); Formicaleo neavinus Navás, 1913 n. comb. of Macronemurus neavinus (Navás, 1913) and n. syn. of Macronemurus perlatus (Gerstaecker, 1885); Macronemurus wittei Navás, 1932 n. syn. of Macronemurus perlatus (Gerstaecker, 1885); Neuroleon lukhtanovi Krivokhatsky, 1996 n. syn. of Neuroleon erato Hölzel, 1972; Neuroleon nubilus Navás, 1913 n. syn. of Neuroleon (Ganussa) tenellus (Klug in Ehrenberg, 1834); Tahulus sordidatus Navás, 1936 n. syn. of Pseudoformicaleo gracilis (Klug in Ehrenberg, 1834); Indoleon tacitus sinicus C.-k. Yang in C.-k. Yang & X.-l. Wang, 2002 n. syn. of Indoleon tacitus (Walker, 1853); Myrmeleon lagopus Gerstaecker, 1894 n. comb. of Nedroledon lagopus (Gerstaecker, 1894), Nedroledon striatus Hölzel, 1972 n. syn. of Nedroledon lagopus (Gerstaecker, 1894); Paraglenurus lotzi Miller & Stange, 1999 n. syn. of Paraglenurus pumilus Yang, 1997. 49 photographs of type specimens are presented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

QIU, JIAN-YUE, HAO XU, and LI CHEN. "A revision of the rare flower beetle genus Macronotops Krikken (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) from Asia with biological notes." Zootaxa 4556, no. 1 (February 17, 2019): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4556.1.1.

Full text
Abstract:
Based on examination of all available types and a large number of additional specimens, the poorly studied genus Macronotops Krikken, 1977 is revised. Thirteen species are recognized, including four new species herein described, M. biserratus Qiu, Xu & Chen, new species from Laos, M. dianensis Qiu, Xu & Chen, new species from China (Yunnan) and Vietnam, M. miksici Qiu, Xu & Chen, new species from China (Yunnan), Myanmar, and India, and M. medogensis Qiu, Xu & Chen, new species from China (Xizang). The neotype of Macronota fulvoguttata Fairmaire, 1891 is designated. Macronotops fulvopilosus (Fairmaire, 1894) is considered as an independent species, and M. olivaceofuscus (Bourgoin, 1916) revised status, formerly regarded as subspecies of M. vuilleti (Bourgoin, 1916), is elevated to species rank. Pleuronota subsexmaculata Ma, 1992, new synonym and P. hefengensis Ma, 1992, new synonym are placed as junior synonym of M. olivaceofuscus and M. fulvoguttatus, respectively. All previous records of M. sexmaculatus (Kraatz, 1894) in southern China are verified as misidentification of M. olivaceofuscus; M. sexmaculatus is recorded from China (Xizang) for the first time, and its distribution appears to be limited to the southern side of the eastern Himalayas. Macronotops olivaceofuscus and M. vuilleti are newly recorded from Vietnam and China, respectively. Sima of Myanmar, the type locality of M. ovaliceps (Arrow, 1941), is located at the border of Myanmar and China (Yunnan); and more specimens of this species were obtained from western Yunnan. Habitus and diagnostic characters are illustrated for all species. Key to species and notes on natural history of this genus are also provided.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Golovatch, S. I., A. R. Nzoko Fiemapong, J. L. Tamesse, J. P. Mauriès, and D. VandenSpiegel. "Trichopolydesmidae from Cameroon, 1: The genus Hemisphaeroparia Schubart, 1955. With a genus-level reclassification of Afrotropical genera of the family (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)." ZooKeys 785 (September 19, 2018): 49–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.785.27422.

Full text
Abstract:
In addition to one of the two species of Trichopolydesmidae hitherto recorded from Cameroon,PolydesmusintegratusPorat, 1894, which is revised based on type material and shown to represent the genusHemisphaeropariaSchubart, 1955,comb. n., 12 new species from the same genus are described from that country:H.zamakoesp. n.,H.bangoulapsp. n.,H.spinigersp. n.,H.ongotsp. n.,H.digitifersp. n.,H.parvasp. n.,H.fuscasp. n.,H.bonakandasp. n.,H.bamboutossp. n.,H.subfalcatasp. n.,H.falcatasp. n.andH.mouankosp. n.A key to all 13 species (ofHemisphaeroparia) known to occur in Cameroon is presented, and their distributions are mapped. All ten recognizable (but excluding two dubious) Afrotropical genera or subgenera of Trichopolydesmidae are rediagnosed and reclassified, based both on their type species and a presumed scenario of gonopodal evolution. As a result, the number of accepted genera is reduced to five:SphaeropariaAttems, 1909 (=MegalopariaBrolemann, 1920),PhysetopariaBrolemann, 1920 (=ElgonicolaAttems, 1939,syn. n., =MabocusChamberlin, 1951,syn. n., =HeterosphaeropariaSchubart, 1955,syn. n.},EburodesmusSchubart, 1955,MecistopariaBrolemann, 1926 (=DendrobrachypusVerhoeff, 1941,syn. n.), andHemisphaeroparia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Smith, Sidney R. "Bloomfield’s revisions of Language (1933)." Historiographia Linguistica 18, no. 1 (January 1, 1991): 167–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.18.1.06smi.

Full text
Abstract:
Summary Leonard Bloomfield’s Language (1933), a milestone in 20th-century linguistics, was revised for the British edition of 1935 to accommodate British English readers. A slightly revised American edition also appeared beginning in 1941. However, no edition following the original publication fully reflects Bloomfield’s wish for more extensive additions and corrections, no doubt because the publishers did not want any resetting of type that would alter pagination and require considerable revision of the whole book. But Bloomfield’s extensive additions and corrections are recorded in notes which he wrote in the margins of a copy owned by his student and junior colleague, John G. Kunstmann (1894–1988). The present article, based on these notes, presents those changes and additions which the author deems of greatest value as improvements in Bloomfield’s treatise. Purely stylistic changes are not included. In general, the modifications amount to clarification of concepts and correction of flawed examples rather than a shift in theoretical positions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Voisine, Nive. "David Lonergan, La Bolduc. La vie de Mary Travers (1894-1941). Biographie , 1992, Bic, Isaac-Dion, 215 p." Tangence, no. 36 (1992): 109. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/025717ar.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

RODRIGUES, JULIANA MOURÃO DOS SANTOS, ANTONIN JEAN JOHAN CRUMIÈRE, SILVIA PATRICIA MONDRAGÓN-F., IRINA MORALES, ABDERRAHMAN KHILA, and FELIPE FERRAZ FIGUEIREDO MOREIRA. "Description of a new species and new records of Gerromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Panama and Colombia." Zootaxa 4958, no. 1 (April 14, 2021): 226–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4958.1.12.

Full text
Abstract:
The fauna of semiaquatic bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) from Panama has been explored mainly between the end of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, with few reports since then, whereas that from Colombia has been intensively studied in the last decade. Here, we describe Rhagovelia joceliae Rodrigues & Moreira, sp. nov. (Veliidae: Rhagoveliinae), from Panama. Additionally, new records from these countries are presented for Mesovelia mulsanti White, 1879, Mes. zeteki Harris & Drake, 1941 (Mesoveliidae: Mesoveliinae), Lipogomphus leucostictus (Champion, 1898) (Hebridae: Hebrinae), Hydrometra caraiba Guérin-Méneville, 1857 (Hydrometridae: Hydrometrinae), Platyvelia brachialis (Stål, 1860), Stridulivelia (Stridulivelia) raspa (Hungerford, 1929) (Veliidae: Veliinae), R. elegans Uhler, 1894, R. perija Polhemus, 1997, R. rosensis Padilla-Gil, 2011 (Veliidae: Rhagoveliinae), Euvelia advena Drake, 1957, Microvelia albonotata Champion, 1898, Mi. fantastika Padilla-Gil, 2019, Mi. mimula White, 1879 (Veliidae: Microveliinae), Metrobates laudatus Drake & Harris, 1937, Telmatometra ujhelyii Esaki, 1926 (Gerridae: Trepobatinae), Brachymetra albinervus (Amyot & Serville, 1843) (Gerridae: Charmatometrinae), Potamobates anchicaya Polhemus & Polhemus, 1995 (Gerridae: Cylindrostethinae), Limnogonus hyalinus (Fabricius, 1803), and Tachygerris opacus (Champion, 1898) (Gerridae: Gerrinae).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Saladžinsks, Sigits Vlads, and Kristina Vaisvalavičiene. "Latviešu izcelsmes Lietuvas arhitekta un inženiera Kārļa Reisona (1894–1981) darbība (1930–1981) Kauņā, Panevēžā un Adelaidā." Inženierzinātņu un augstskolu vēsture 3 (October 15, 2019): 34–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7250/iav.2019.003.

Full text
Abstract:
Raksts iepazīstina ar latviešu izcelsmes Lietuvas arhitekta un inženiera Kārļa Reisona (Karolis Reisonas; 1894–1981) profesionālo darbību mūža otrajā pusē – no 1930. gada Kauņā, Panevēžā un Adelaidā – un viņa darbu nozīmi Lietuvas arhitektūras vēsturē. K. Reisons bija viens no spilgtākajiem 20. gadsimta starpkaru perioda Lietuvas modernās arhitektūras radītājiem, kopā ar citiem slaveniem Lietuvas arhitektiem veidoja īpašo starpkaru perioda Kauņas modernās arhitektūras stilu. K. Reisons ir reprezentatīvu celtņu Šauļos, Kauņā un citās Lietuvas pilsētās, kā arī Rīgā un Adelaidā autors vai līdzautors. Arhitekts un inženieris K. Reisons strādāja par Šauļu pilsētas inženieri un pašvaldības Būvniecības nodaļas vadītāju (1922–1930), Šauļu arodskolas direktoru (1926), Lietuvas Lauksaimniecības kameras konsultantu (1927–1928), Kauņas pašvaldības Būvniecības nodaļas vadītāju (1930–1938), Panevēžas inženieri (1940) un birģermeistaru (1941–1944). No 1949. gada Reisonu ģimene dzīvoja Adelaidā, Austrālijā. Pēc viņa projektiem Lietuvā uzcelti trīs neatkarības pieminekļi – Šauļu Neatkarības piemineklis, Kauņas Brīvības pieminekļa postaments un Kauņas Romas katoļu Kristus Augšāmcelšanās baznīca. 14 no viņa projektētām celtnēm Kauņā un Šauļos ir iekļautas Lietuvas nekustamo kultūras vērtību sarakstā. Agrīniem K. Reisona projektiem raksturīgs historisms, eklektisma elementi, «ķieģeļu stils», vēlākie projekti iezīmējas ar modernismam raksturīgu askētisko racionālismu, funkcionālismu, piemērošanos pie pilsētbūvnieciskā un kultūrvēsturiskā konteksta. The article introduces the professional activities of Latvian-born Lithuanian architect and engineer Karolis Reisonas (in Latvian: Kārlis Reisons; 1894–1981) in the second half of his life – from 1930 in Kaunas, Panevėžys and Adelaide cities – and his role in the history of Lithuanian architecture. K. Reisonas was one of the most prominent creators of modern 20th-century interwar Lithuanian architecture and together with other famous Lithuanian architects formed a special style of Kaunas modern architecture in interwar period. K. Reisonas is the author or co-author of representative buildings in Šiauliai, Kaunas and other Lithuanian cities, as well as in Riga and Adelaide cities. Architect and engineer K. Reisonas worked as Šiauliai City Engineer and Head of Municipal Construction Department (1922–1930), Director of Šiauliai Vocational School (1926), Consultant of Lithuanian Chamber of Agriculture (1927–1928), Head of Construction Department of Kaunas Municipality (1930–1938), Panevėžys City Engineer (1940) and Burgomaster (1941–1944). From 1949, the Reisonas family lived in Adelaide city, Australia. To his projects three monuments of independence were built in Lithuania – Monument of Independence in Šiauliai city, Podium of the Freedom Monument of Kaunas city and Roman Catholic Christ’s Resurrection Church in Kaunas city. Fourteen of buildings in Lithuania (in Kaunas and Šiauliai cities) designed by him are included in the list of cultural values of Lithuania. Early K. Reisonas’ projects are characterized by historism, elements of eclecticism and «brick style», later projects are characterized by austere rationalism, functionalism, adaptation to urban construction and cultural and historical context.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Pippard, Sir Brian. "Vignette¶Elisabeth Hertz (née Doll) 1864–1941 Widow of Heinrich Rudolf Hertz 1857–1894 Professor of Physics, University of Bonn." Physics in Perspective 4, no. 2 (May 2002): 241–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00016-002-8366-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Cieślak, Stanisław. "Ks. arcybiskup Adam Kozłowiecki SJ w obozie koncentracyjnym w Dachau w 1972 roku." Nasza Przeszłość 127 (June 30, 2017): 221–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.52204/np.2017.127.221-240.

Full text
Abstract:
25 sierpnia 1972 roku, w przeddzień rozpoczęcia XX Letnich Igrzysk Olimpijskich w Monachium, podczas Godziny Wspomnień na terenie byłego hitlerowskiego obozu koncentracyjnego w Dachau, arcybiskup Adam Kozłowiecki SJ (1911-2007) wygłosił przemówienie, które stanowiło ostrzeżenie przed nienawiścią i wezwanie do budowania cywilizacji na fundamencie Ewangelii miłości i szacunku wobec każdego człowieka. Przemówienie hierarchy Kościoła zambijskiego miało wyjątkowy wymiar, albowiem był on więźniem hitlerowskich obozów koncentracyjnych w Auschwitz i Dachau. Po cudownym uwolnieniu z obozu w Dachau udał się do Rodezji Północnej (obecnie Zambia) i jako misjonarz poświęcił jej 61 lat życia. Jezuita polski przywołał w przemówieniu polskiego franciszkanina Maksymiliana Marię Kolbego (1894-1941), którego rok wcześniej 17 października 1971 roku beatyfikował papież Paweł VI, i ukazał go jako wzór zwycięzcy w walce nienawiści z miłością. Podkreślał w przemówieniu, że wszyscy jesteśmy braćmi i wszyscy mamy wspólnego Ojca – Boga. Przemówienie arcybiskupa A. Kozłowieckiego odbiło się dużym echem w Niemczech. Wspominano je także w Afryce, m.in. w Zambii i Południowej Afryce. W Polsce do rozpowszechnienia przemówienia arcybiskupa A. Kozłowieckiego w obozie w Dachau przyczynił się „Tygodnik Powszechny”, który opublikował je w całości we własnym tłumaczeniu w języku polskim i opatrzył dwoma zdjęciami z uroczystości na terenie obozu w Dachau
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Taukinaitytė-Narbutienė, Rūta. "Lietuvos pirmosios nepriklausomybės laikų knygrišys Zigmas Malašauskas." Knygotyra 71 (December 19, 2018): 275–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/kn.v71i0.12265.

Full text
Abstract:
[straipsnis ir santrauka lietuvių kalba; santrauka anglų kalba] Zigmas Malašauskas (apie 1894–1898 – po 1941 m.), menkai žinomas tarpukario knygrišys, XX a. ketvirtajame dešimtmetyje gyveno ir dirbo Kaune. Surinkus ir įvertinus archyvinius šaltinius ir publikacijas, išryškėjo jo neeilinės ambicijos ir aktyvi visuomeninė edukacinė veikla, siekiant propaguoti savo amatą, skatinti meninių įrišimų poreikį ir supratimą, kelti amato lygį ir kolegų knygrišių kvalifikaciją. Jo straipsniai spaudoje buvo skirti tiek plačiajai visuomenei (vartotojui), tiek knygrišystės meistrams. Jo laiškai kai kurioms valstybinėms institucijoms ir visuomeninėms organizacijoms, kuriuose buvo kreipiamasi su įvairiais argumentuotais prašymais ar pasiūlymais, atskleidžia realius ketinimus siekti valstybės dėmesio, palaikymo ir paramos, įrodyti knygrišystės meno svarbą. Nors jo pastangos nebuvo realizuotos, tikėtina, kad jo straipsniai darė įtaką to meto knygos bendruomenei. Kadangi apie knygrišystę vienintelis rašė tiek daug, šių dienų tyrėjui jis paliko nemažai gana patikimų duomenų (kuriuos patvirtina ir kiti šaltiniai) apie to meto knygrišystę ir jos problemas, meistrus ir kainas, statistinius duomenis ir vertinimus, darbo metodus, mokymosi šaltinius, turimas žinias, gebėjimus, priemones. Kol kas nežinoma nė vienos šio knygrišio įrištos knygos. Taip pat lieka daug nežinomų biografijos faktų, todėl tikimasi, kad šis straipsnis paskatins ar palengvins tolesnius šio asmens gyvenimo ir veiklos tyrimus, padės atrasti ir identifikuoti jo įrišus.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

SHELLEY, ROWLAND M., and DANIELA MARTINEZ-TORRES. "The milliped family Platyrhacidae (Polydesmida: Leptodesmidea) in the West Indies: Proposal of Hoffmanorhacus n. gen.; description and illustrations of males of Proaspis aitia Loomis, 1941; redescription of Nannorrhacus luciae (Pocock, 1894); hypotheses on origins and affinities; and an updated New World familial distribution." Zootaxa 3626, no. 4 (March 15, 2013): 477–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3626.4.4.

Full text
Abstract:
In the New World, the milliped family Platyrhacidae (Polydesmida) is known or projected for Central Americasouth of southeastern Nicaraguaand the northern ¼ of South America, with disjunct, insular populations on Hispaniola(Haiti), Guadeloupe(Basse-Terre), and St. Lucia. Male near-topotypes enable redescription of Proaspis aitia Loomis, 1941, possibly endemic to the western end of the southern Haitian peninsula. The tibiotarsus of its biramous gonopodal telopodite bends strongly laterad, and the medially directed solenomere arises at midlength proximal to the bend. With a uniramous telopodite, P. sahlii Jeekel, 1980, on Guadeloupe, is not congeneric, and Hoffmanorhacus, n. gen., is erected to accommodate it. Nannorrhacus luciae (Pocock, 1894), onSt. Lucia, is redescribed; also with a biramous telopodite, its tibiotarsus arises distad and diverges from the coaxial solenomere. The Antillean species do not comprise a clade and are only distantly related; rather than introductions, they plausibly reflect ancestral occurrences on the “proto-Antillean” terrain before it rifted from “proto-SouthAmerica” in the Cretaceous/Paleocene, with fragmentation isolating modern forms on their present islands. Existing platyrhacid tribes are formally elevated to subfamilies as this category was omitted from recent taxonomies. Without unequivocal evidence to the contrary, geographically anomalous species should initially be regarded as indigenous rather than anthropochoric.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Агеев, Димитрий. "The Archive of Archpriest Alexius Ostapov: Publiсation of Selected Documents." Церковный историк, no. 1(5) (March 15, 2021): 118–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.31802/ch.2021.5.1.009.

Full text
Abstract:
Предлагаемая вниманию читателей публикация документов из личного архива протоиерея Алексия Остапова состоит из избранных писем Патриарха Алексия I (Симанского) семье Остаповых, записей, сделанных им в домашней книге Остаповых в разные годы, его завещания (духовное и нотариальное) и келейный заупокойный помянник. Письма датированы периодом 1941-1945 гг. Адресатом большинства писем Патриарха Алексия является отец протоиерея Алексия Остапова - Даниил Андреевич. Даниил Андреевич Остапов (1894-1975) - личный секретарь и келейник Патриарха Алексия I, заместитель председателя хозяйственного управления Московской Патриархии. Сын Д. А. Остапова - Алексей (Лёня), женившись, принял священный сан и преподавал в Московских духовных школах, став одним из основателей Церковно-археологического кабинета МДА и С. Патриарх относился к Лёне Остапову не просто с любовью, он принимал деятельное участие в его жизни с самого детства, не оставляя его своим вниманием и попечением даже тогда, когда тот стал взрослым. В последние годы Патриарха Алексия Остаповы продолжали находиться всегда рядом с Патриархом, оставаясь ему самыми близкими людьми. Не удивительно, что именно Даниил Андреевич и отец Алексий стали душеприказчиками Патриарха после его смерти, что нашло отражение в завещании. Именно им Патриарх Алексий оставил всё своё имущество. В келейном помяннике Патриарха мы видим имена самых разных людей: здесь рядом великие князья и маляр Никольского собора, патриархи и «слепец», наместники крупнейших монастырей и женщина, «что стояла у иконы Скоропослушницы». The publication of documents from the personal archive of Archpriest Alexius Ostapov consists of selected letters of Patriarch Alexius I (Simansky) to the Ostapov family, the records made by him in Ostapov’s home book in different years, his testament (spiritual and notarial), and his private prayer list of the deceased people. The letters are dated 1941-1945. The majority of his letters are addressed to Daniil Ostapov, the father of Archpriest Alexius Ostapov. Daniil Ostapov (1894-1975) was the personal secretary and the cell-attendant of Patriarch Alexius I, Deputy Chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate Economic Department. D. A. Ostapov’s son Alexei (Lyonya), having got married, took ordination to the priesthood (as Alexius) and taught in Moscow Theological Schools, becoming one of the founders of the Church-Archaeological Cabinet of the of the Moscow Theological Academy and Seminary. The Patriarch not only treated Lyonya Ostapov with love, he was actively involved in his life since childhood, not taking away his attention and care even when Lyonya became an adult. During the last years of Patriarch Alexius, the Ostapovs continued to be always close to the Patriarch, remaining the closest people to him. Not surprisingly, it was Daniil Andreievich Ostapov and Father Alexius became the executors of the Patriarch after his death, what was reflected in his will. It was to them that Patriarch Alexius left all his possessions to. In the Patriarch’s prayer list of the deceased we see the names of all sorts of people: Grand Dukes and the wallpainter of St Nicholas Cathedral, Patriarchs and “the blind man”, superiors of major monasteries and the woman «who stood by the icon of the Mother of our God called “She Who is Quick to Hear”».
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Casselton, Lorna A., and David A. Jones. "Dan Lewis. 30 December 1910 — 30 September 2009." Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 58 (January 2012): 163–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.2011.0023.

Full text
Abstract:
Dan Lewis is best known for his work on plant breeding systems. Self-incompatibility is common in hermaphroditic plants as a mechanism that prevents inbreeding; it may be determined by genes expressed in the haploid gametes (gametophytic) or by those expressed in the diploid tissue that gives rise to gametes (sporophytic). At different times in his career, Lewis contributed to a better understanding of both these systems, but it was his work on the gametophytic system in the evening primrose, Oenothera organensis , that broke new ground and enabled him to predict a molecular recognition between different proteins produced in the pollen and style; these proteins were encoded by tightly linked genes at a complex self-incompatibility ( S ) locus. Modern molecular techniques have since confirmed these predictions and revealed the actual nature of the proteins and their interactions. The research began as part of a programme of breeding plants of horticultural and agricultural importance while working at the John Innes Institute, the foremost place to study genetics in the UK at that time. The Institution had William Bateson (FRS 1894) as its first director, followed by Sir Daniel Hall (FRS 1909), who in turn was succeeded in 1939 by Cyril Darlington (FRS 1941). To begin your career there in the 1930s was almost guaranteed to lead to scientific success.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Saladžinskas, Sigitas Vladas, and Kristina Vaisvalavičienė. "Professional Activities (1930–1981) of Latvian-Born Lithuanian Architect and Engineer Karolis Reisonas (1894–1981) in Kaunas, Panevėžys and Adelaide Cities." History of Engineering Sciences and Institutions of Higher Education 3 (October 15, 2019): 35–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.7250/hesihe.2019.003.

Full text
Abstract:
The article introduces the professional activities of Latvian-born Lithuanian architect and engineer Karolis Reisonas (in Latvian: Kārlis Reisons; 1894–1981) in the second half of his life – from 1930 in Kaunas, Panevėžys and Adelaide cities – and his role in the history of Lithuanian architecture. K. Reisonas was one of the most prominent creators of modern 20th-century interwar Lithuanian architecture and together with other famous Lithuanian architects formed a special style of Kaunas modern architecture in interwar period. K. Reisonas is the author or co-author of representative buildings in Šiauliai, Kaunas and other Lithuanian cities, as well as in Riga and Adelaide cities. Architect and engineer K. Reisonas worked as Šiauliai City Engineer and Head of Municipal Construction Department (1922–1930), Director of Šiauliai Vocational School (1926), Consultant of Lithuanian Chamber of Agriculture (1927–1928), Head of Construction Department of Kaunas Municipality (1930– 1938), Panevėžys City Engineer (1940) and Burgomaster (1941–1944). From 1949, the Reisonas family lived in Adelaide city, Australia. To his projects three monuments of independence were built in Lithuania – Monument of Independence in Šiauliai city, Podium of the Freedom Monument of Kaunas city and Roman Catholic Christ’s Resurrection Church in Kaunas city. Fourteen of buildings in Lithuania (in Kaunas and Šiauliai cities) designed by him are included in the list of cultural values of Lithuania. Early K. Reisonas’ projects are characterized by historism, elements of eclecticism and «brick style», later projects are characterized by austere rationalism, functionalism, adaptation to urban construction and cultural and historical context.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Saladžinsks, Sigits Vlads, and Kristina Vaisvalavičiene. "Latviešu izcelsmes Lietuvas arhitekts un inženieris Kārlis Reisons (1894–1981) un viņa profesionālā darbība Šauļos." Inženierzinātņu un augstskolu vēsture 2 (November 1, 2018): 97–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.7250/iav.2018.008.

Full text
Abstract:
Raksts iepazīstina ar Latvijā mazzināma latviešu izcelsmes Lietuvas arhitekta un inženiera Kārļa Reisona (Karolis Reisonas; 1894–1981) dzīvi un profesionālo darbību Šauļos, kā arī aktualizē svarīgākās arhitekta daiļrades mantojuma iezīmes un viņa darbu nozīmi Lietuvas arhitektūras vēsturē. K. Reisons bija viens no spilgtākajiem 20. gadsimta starp-karu perioda Lietuvas modernās arhitektūras radītājiem. K. Reisons ir reprezentatīvu celtņu Lietuvas pilsētās, kā arī Rīgā un Adelaidā (Austrālija) autors vai līdzautors. Rīgas reālskolas (1913) un Sanktpēterburgas civilinženieru institūta (1920) absolvents K. Reisons strādāja par Šauļu pilsētas inženieri un pašvaldības Būvniecības nodaļas vadītāju (1922–1930), Šauļu būvniecības desmitnieku1 kursu (1925), vēlāk arī Šauļu arodskolas direktoru (1926), Lietuvas Lauksaimniecības kameras konsultantu (1927–1928). 14 no viņa projektētām celtnēm Kauņā un Šauļos ir iekļautas Lietuvas Kultūras vērtību reģistrā. Agrīniem K. Reisona projektiem raksturīgs historisms ar eklektisma elementiem un tā sauktais «ķieģeļu stils». Vēlākie projekti iezīmējas ar modernajai arhitektūrai raksturīgu askētisko racionālismu, funkcionālismu un piemērošanos pilsētbūvniecības un kultūrvēsturiskajam kontekstam. Pēc Otrā pasaules kara viņš ar ģimeni emigrēja uz Vāciju, vēlāk – uz Adelaidu, piedalījies Adelaidas lietuviešu kopienas dzīvē. The article introduces the professional activities of Latvian-born Lithuanian architect and engineer Karolis Reisonas (in Latvian: Kārlis Reisons; 1894–1981) in the second half of his life – from 1930 in Kaunas, Panevėžys and Adelaide cities – and his role in the history of Lithuanian architecture. K. Reisonas was one of the most prominent creators of modern 20th-century interwar Lithuanian architecture and together with other famous Lithuanian architects formed a special style of Kaunas modern architecture in interwar period. K. Reisonas is the author or co-author of representative buildings in Šiauliai, Kaunas and other Lithuanian cities, as well as in Riga and Adelaide cities. Architect and engineer K. Reisonas worked as Šiauliai City Engineer and Head of Municipal Construction Department (1922–1930), Director of Šiauliai Vocational School (1926), Consultant of Lithuanian Chamber of Agriculture (1927–1928), Head of Construction Department of Kaunas Municipality (1930–1938), Panevėžys City Engineer (1940) and Burgomaster (1941–1944). From 1949, the Reisonas family lived in Adelaide city, Australia. To his projects three monuments of independence were built in Lithuania – Monument of Independence in Šiauliai city, Podium of the Freedom Monument of Kaunas city and Roman Catholic Christ’s Resurrection Church in Kaunas city. Fourteen of buildings in Lithuania (in Kaunas and Šiauliai cities) designed by him are included in the list of cultural values of Lithuania. Early K. Reisonas’ projects are characterized by historism, elements of eclecticism and «brick style», later projects are characterized by austere rationalism, functionalism, adaptation to urban construction and cultural and historical context.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Richalet, Jean-Paul. "The invention of hypoxia." Journal of Applied Physiology 130, no. 5 (May 1, 2021): 1573–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00936.2020.

Full text
Abstract:
The word “hypoxia” has recently come to the attention of the general public on two occasions, the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology in 2019 and the recent COVID-19 pandemic. In the academic environment, hypoxia is a current topic of research in biology, physiology, and medicine: in October 2020, there were more than 150,000 occurrences of “hypoxia” in the PubMed database. However, the first occurrence is dated to 1945, while the interest for the effects of oxygen lack on the living organisms started in the mid-19th century, when scientists explored high altitude regions and mainly used the terms “anoxia” or “anoxemia.” I therefore researched online through multiple databases to look for the first appearance of “hypoxia” and related terms “hypoxemia” and “hypoxybiosis” in scientific literature published in English, German, French, Italian, and Spanish. Viault and Jolyet used “Hypohématose” in 1894, but this term has not been used since. Hypoxybiosis first appeared in 1909 in Germany, then hypoxemia in 1923 in Austria, and hypoxia in 1938 in Holland. It was then exported to the United States where it appeared in 1940 in cardiology and anesthesiology. The clinical distinction between anoxia and hypoxia was clearly defined by Carl Wiggers in 1941. Hypoxia (decrease in oxygen), by essence variable in time and in localization in the body, in contrast with anoxia (absence of oxygen), illustrates the concept of homeodynamics that defines a living organism as a complex system in permanent instability, exposed to environmental and internal perturbations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Smith, Sarah M., Roger A. Beaver, and Anthony I. Cognato. "A monograph of the Xyleborini (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) of the Indochinese Peninsula (except Malaysia) and China." ZooKeys 983 (November 3, 2020): 1–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.983.52630.

Full text
Abstract:
The Southeast Asian xyleborine ambrosia beetle fauna is reviewed for the first time. Thirty-four genera and 315 species are reviewed, illustrated, and keyed to genera and species. Sixty-three new species are described: Amasa cycloxystersp. nov., Amasa galeodermasp. nov., Amasa gibbosasp. nov., Amasa linisp. nov., Amasa tropidacronsp. nov., Amasa youliisp. nov., Ambrosiophilus caliginestrissp. nov., Ambrosiophilus indicussp. nov., Ambrosiophilus lannaensissp. nov., Ambrosiophilus papilliferussp. nov., Ambrosiophilus wantaneeaesp. nov., Anisandrus achaetesp. nov., Anisandrus aucosp. nov., Anisandrus auratipilussp. nov., Anisandrus congruenssp. nov., Anisandrus cryphaloidessp. nov., Anisandrus feroniasp. nov., Anisandrus herasp. nov., Anisandrus paragogussp. nov., Anisandrus sinivalisp. nov., Anisandrus venustussp. nov., Anisandrus xuannusp. nov., Arixyleborus crassiorsp. nov., Arixyleborus phiaoacensissp. nov., Arixyleborus setosussp. nov., Arixyleborus silvanussp. nov., Arixyleborus sittichayaisp. nov., Arixyleborus titanussp. nov., Coptodryas amydrasp. nov., Coptodryas carinatasp. nov., Coptodryas inornatasp. nov., Cyclorhipidion amasoidessp. nov., Cyclorhipidion amputatumsp. nov., Cyclorhipidion denticaudasp. nov., Cyclorhipidion muticumsp. nov., Cyclorhipidion obesulumsp. nov., Cyclorhipidion petrosumsp. nov., Cyclorhipidion truncaudinumsp. nov., Cyclorhipidion xeniolumsp. nov., Euwallacea geminussp. nov., Euwallacea neptissp. nov., Euwallacea subalpinussp. nov., Euwallacea testudinatussp. nov., Heteroborips fastigatussp. nov., Heteroborips indicussp. nov., Microperus latesalebrinussp. nov., Microperus minaxsp. nov., Microperus sagmatussp. nov., Streptocranus petilussp. nov., Truncaudum bullatumsp. nov., Xyleborinus cuneatussp. nov., Xyleborinus disgregussp. nov., Xyleborinus echinopterussp. nov., Xyleborinus ephialtodessp. nov., Xyleborinus huifenyinaesp. nov., Xyleborinus jianghuansunisp. nov., Xyleborinus thaiphamisp. nov., Xyleborinus tritussp. nov., Xyleborus opacussp. nov., Xyleborus sunisaesp. nov., Xyleborus yunnanensissp. nov., Xylosandrus bellinsulanussp. nov., Xylosandrus spinifersp. nov.. Thirteen new combinations are given: Ambrosiophilus consimilis (Eggers) comb. nov., Anisandrus carinensis (Eggers) comb. nov., Anisandrus cristatus (Hagedorn) comb. nov., Anisandrus klapperichi (Schedl) comb. nov., Anisandrus percristatus (Eggers) comb. nov., Arixyleborus resecans (Eggers) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion armiger (Schedl) comb. nov., Debus quadrispinus (Motschulsky) comb. nov., Heteroborips tristis (Eggers) comb. nov., Leptoxyleborus machili (Niisima) comb. nov., Microperus cruralis (Schedl) comb. nov., Planiculus shiva (Maiti & Saha) comb. nov., Xylosandrus formosae (Wood) comb. nov. Twenty-four new synonyms are proposed: Ambrosiophilus osumiensis (Murayama, 1934) (= Xyleborus nodulosus Eggers, 1941 syn. nov.); Ambrosiophilus subnepotulus (Eggers, 1930) (= Xyleborus cristatuloides Schedl, 1971 syn. nov.); Ambrosiophilus sulcatus (Eggers, 1930) (= Xyleborus sinensis Eggers, 1941 syn. nov.; = Xyleborus sulcatulus Eggers, 1939 syn. nov.); Anisandrus hirtus (Hagedorn, 1904) (= Xyleborus hirtipes Schedl, 1969 syn. nov.); Cnestus protensus (Eggers, 1930) (= Cnestus rostratus Schedl, 1977 syn. nov.); Cyclorhipidion bodoanum (Reitter, 1913) (= Xyleborus misatoensis Nobuchi, 1981 syn. nov.); Cyclorhipidion distinguendum (Eggers, 1930) (= Xyleborus fukiensis Eggers, 1941 syn. nov.; = Xyleborus ganshoensis Murayama, 1952 syn. nov.); Cyclorhipidion inarmatum (Eggers, 1923) (= Xyleborus vagans Schedl, 1977 syn. nov.); Debus quadrispinus (Motschulsky, 1863) (= Xyleborus fallax Eichhoff, 1878 syn. nov.); Euwallacea gravelyi (Wichmann, 1914) (= Xyleborus barbatomorphus Schedl, 1951 syn. nov.); Euwallacea perbrevis (Schedl, 1951) (= Xyleborus molestulus Wood, 1975 syn. nov.; Euwallacea semirudis (Blandford, 1896) (= Xyleborus neohybridus Schedl, 1942 syn. nov.); Euwallacea sibsagaricus (Eggers, 1930) (= Xyleborus tonkinensis Schedl, 1934 syn. nov.); Euwallacea velatus (Sampson, 1913) (= Xyleborus rudis Eggers, 1930 syn. nov.); Microperus kadoyamaensis (Murayama, 1934) (= Xyleborus pubipennis Schedl, 1974 syn. nov.; =Xyleborus denseseriatus Eggers, 1941 syn. nov.); Stictodex dimidiatus (Eggers, 1927) (=Xyleborus dorsosulcatus Beeson, 1930 syn. nov.); Webbia trigintispinata Sampson, 1922 (= Webbia mucronatus Eggers, 1927 syn. nov.); Xyleborinus artestriatus (Eichhoff, 1878) (= Xyelborus angustior [sic] Eggers, 1925 syn. nov.; = Xyleborus undatus Schedl, 1974 syn. nov.); Xyleborinus exiguus (Walker, 1859) (= Xyleborus diversus Schedl, 1954 syn. nov.); Xyleborus muticus Blandford, 1894 (= Xyleborus conditus Schedl, 1971 syn. nov.; = Xyleborus lignographus Schedl, 1953 syn. nov.). Seven species are removed from synonymy and reinstated as valid species: Anisandrus cristatus (Hagedorn, 1908), Cyclorhipidion tenuigraphum (Schedl, 1953), Diuncus ciliatoformis (Schedl, 1953), Euwallacea gravelyi (Wichmann, 1914), Euwallacea semirudis (Blandford, 1896), Microperus fulvulus (Schedl, 1942), Xyleborinus subspinosus (Eggers, 1930).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Lee, Geun-Yeol. "A study on the historical changes of Jeolyeongdo placename in Busan." Dongnam Journal of Korean Language and Literature 55 (May 31, 2023): 5–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.21654/djkll.2023.55.1.5.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to determine the timing of the change from ‘Jeoryeong-do’ to ‘Yeong-do’. The results are as follows. First, the first time Yeong-do's placename appeared in literature was in Yeongdo-jin's Dongnaebujido in Yeongnam-eupji, made in 1894. Also, ‘Yeong-do’ as the name of the island first appears in the 󰡔Choryanggaekjuhoeuisogyuchik󰡕 written in 1901. This confirms that the place name ‘Yeong-do’ is not a placename created by the Japanese Colonial Period, but a placename used by the people of Busan in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Later, in 1959, the Placename Establishment Committee established ‘Yeongdo’ as the official placename, and it has remained to this day. Second, other spellings of jeoryeong-do include ‘Jeolyeongdo(折英島)’ from 「Dongnaebusanpojido」 in 1471, ‘Jeolmado(絶馬島)’ from 「Haedongpaldobonghwasanakjido」 from the late 17th century, and ‘Jeoldo’ from 󰡔Gyeongwajimnyak󰡕 written in 1883~1885. Third, in Japan, it was officially spelled ‘Jeoryeongdo’ after the first mention of ‘Jeoryeongdo’ in the 󰡔Daeilbonsa󰡕 in 1213, but it is confirmed that it was called ‘Makinosima(牧の島)’ after ‘Mokdo(牧島)’ appeared in the 「Choryangjihoedo」 in the late 17th century. However, the 'yeongdo' placename that appeared in 《Joseonchongdokbugwanbo》 in 1920, 1923, 1925, 1933, 1939, 1941, 1943, and 1945 is not an official placename, but a branch name of a particular religion. Fourth, the ‘Busandaegyo’, which was completed in 1934, is spelled ‘Mokjidogyo’ in 󰡔Gyonamji󰡕 in 1937, confirming that it was officially called ‘Mokjidogyo’ instead of ‘YeongdoDaegyo’.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

NORRBOM, ALLEN L., BRUCE D. SUTTON, GARY J. STECK, and JOSÉ MONZÓN. "New genera, species and host plant records of Nearctic and Neotropical Tephritidae (Diptera)." Zootaxa 2398, no. 1 (March 12, 2010): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2398.1.1.

Full text
Abstract:
Three new genera and five new species of Tephritidae (Diptera) are described from the Nearctic and Neotropical Regions. The new genera are: Agallamyia Norrbom (type species: A. pendula Norrbom, n. sp.), Neosphaeniscus Norrbom (type species: Euribia m-nigrum Hendel), and Phacelochaeta Norrbom (type species: Procecidochares quinquefasciata Hendel). The new species include: Acidogona stecki Norrbom (Guatemala, Mexico: Chiapas), Agallamyia pendula Norrbom (Guatemala), Phacelochaeta obliqua Norrbom (Ecuador), Procecidochares suttoni Norrbom (Guatemala), Stenopa mexicana Norrbom (Mexico). Five new generic synonyms are proposed: Cecidocharella Hendel, 1936 =4 · Zootaxa 2398 © 2010 Magnolia PressDracontomyia Becker, 1919; Gerrhoceras Hering, 1942 = Pyrgotoides Curran, 1934; Stoneola Hering, 1941 = Rhagoletis Loew, 1862; Strobelia Rondani, 1868 = Rachiptera Bigot, 1859; and Xenochaeta Snow, 1894 = Acidogona Loew, 1873. The following 41 new combinations are proposed: Acidogona dichromata (Snow), Dictyotrypeta crenulata (Wulp), D. incisa (Wulp), Dioxyna crockeri (Curran), Dracontomyia tucumana (Aczél), D. borrichia (Bush & Huettel), and D. elegans (Hendel), Homoeothrix aberrans (Schiner), Neosphaeniscus m-nigrum (Hendel) and N. flexuosus (Bigot), Paracantha trinotata (Foote), Phacelochaeta quinquefasciata (Hendel) and P. quinquevittata (Norrbom), Plaumannimyia ameghinoi (Brèthes), P. coelestina (Hering), P. delicatella (Blanchard), P. difficilis (Malloch), P. dolores (Hering), P. eugenia (Wulp), P. flava (Adams), P. hestiae (Hendel), P. imitatrix (Hering), P. miseta (Hering), P. plagiata (Blanchard), P. scutellata (Séguy), P. setulosa (Malloch), P. subaster (Malloch), P. suspecta (Malloch), P. thomsoni (Hendel), P. titschacki (Hering), and P. valdesiana (Gandolfo & Norrbom), Pyrgotoides paradoxus (Hering) and P. peruvianus (Korytkowski), Rachiptera alboguttata (Hendel), R. baccharidis (Rondani), R. bimaculata (Hendel), R. ferruginea (Hendel), R. lutulenta (Hendel), R. parallela (Hendel), and R. rubiginosa (Rondani), and Rhagoletis fuscobasalis (Hering). A lectotype is designated for R. fuscobasalis. New distribution and host plant records also are reported.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Zulmane, Linda. "Andrieva Niedras prozas varoņu reliģisko uzskatu pārmaiņas." Aktuālās problēmas literatūras un kultūras pētniecībā rakstu krājums, no. 28 (March 24, 2023): 261–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.37384/aplkp.2023.28.261.

Full text
Abstract:
At the turn of the 19th /20th century, in an era of transition (fin de siècle), both social and economic processes, as well as aspects of education and spiritual culture, change. At the turn of the 19th/20th century, several authors focused on the solution of religious issues, Jānis Poruks (1871–1924) wrote the essay “Nākotnes Reliģija” (Religion of Future) (1894), Andrievs Niedra (1871–1942) published a series of articles in the magazine “Austrums” (1905), religious issues have been addressed in several writers’ prose. Niedra believes that he has found the key to the religious problem of the transition era. Religious ideals are the signposts that mark the course of human development, and religion is the promulgator of people’s life assignments. Art, religion, and virtue are transformed similarly; this transformation is determined by the solitary or collective individual’s heredity and environment. The religious views of the characters of Niedra’s prose (the stories “The Feeble Soul” (Nespēcīgā Dvēsele), “The Fourth Fellow” (Ceturtais Biedrs), “Without One’s Past” (Bez paša pagātnes), the novel “In the Smokes of a Clearing” (Līduma dūmos), etc.) are based on personalism as a direction of philosophy in the second half of the 19th century, Gustav Teichmüller (1850–1937), Alexey Kozlov (1831–1901), Lev Lopatin (1855–1920), Jēkabs Osis (1860–1919), Haralds Biezais (1909–1995), Voldemārs Maldonis (1870–1941), Kārlis Kundziņš (1850–1937), Alberts Freijs (1903– 1968). The aim of the article is to reveal the religious views of the characters of Niedra’s prose and their change at the turn of the 19th/20th century. The descriptive, comparative, psychoanalytical, and anthropological methods are used.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Koprowski, Piotr. "Rosyjski ruch wolnościowy w XIX wieku w oglądzie Ludwika Kulczyckiego." Acta Polono-Ruthenica 2, no. XXVI (June 30, 2021): 177–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/apr.6968.

Full text
Abstract:
Ludwik Kulczycki (1866–1941) był polskim socjologiem, publicystą, działaczem socjalistycznym (w latach 1894–1910 członkiem Polskiej Partii Socjalistycznej), w okresie II Rzeczypospolitej profesorem-wykładowcą w Szkole Nauk Politycznych i Wyższej Szkole Dziennikarskiej w Warszawie. Przedmiotem jego zainteresowań naukowych była w głównej mierze historia ruchów społecznych XIX w. oraz zagadnienia prawno-ustrojowe. W niniejszym artykule przybliżono poglądy i zapatrywania L. Kulczyckiego na rosyjski ruch wolnościowy w XIX w., zaprezentowane w dwuczęściowym dziele Rewolucja rosyjska, opublikowanym na początku XX stulecia (1909–1911). Za niezwykle ważne w tym kontekście uznano uwypuklenie zarówno tego, co dla socjologa stanowiło istotę rzeczonego ruchu (organizacje, działacze), jak i kryteriów, za pomocą których go systematyzował i oceniał. L. Kulczycki był zwolennikiem idei ewolucyjnego rozwoju społeczeństw oraz wprowadzania przeobrażeń w państwie. Znajomość przeszłości, działania cywilizacyjno-modernizacyjne podejmowane przez władzę państwową, a także istnienie i aktywność elit wyrażających potrzeby ogółu determinuje – w jego przekonaniu – postęp. Stąd też pozytywnie oceniał on wszelkie przejawy organizowania się inteligencji i szlachty rosyjskiej w imię walki o ideały wolnościowe, o zmiany na niwie prawno-ustrojowej (praca nad projektami konstytucji dla Rosji i postulat jej wprowadzenia w życie) oraz o uświadomienie niższych warstw społecznych. Rosyjski ruch wolnościowy w XIX w., obejmujący wiele wewnętrznie zróżnicowanych nurtów, został – co prawda – określony przez L. Kulczyckiego mianem ruchu rewolucyjnego, co jednak nie oznacza, że uczony był zwolennikiem radykalnych, rewolucyjnych rozwiązań. Socjolog starał się dowieść ciągłości tego ruchu zarówno pod względem ideowym, jak i poprzez osoby działające w poszczególnych okresach. Rewolucjonistów oceniał nie za przez pryzmat stopnia radykalizmu ich działań, lecz zaangażowania na rzecz wprowadzenia w Rosji novum w zakresie prawno-ustrojowym. Podejmowane przez niektórych działaczy akty terroru starał się, przynajmniej w pewnym stopniu, usprawiedliwiać, podkreślając, że były m.in. przejawem samoobrony przy aresztowaniach, odwetu na szpiegach czy znienawidzonych przedstawicielach aparatu państwowego.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Bartosik OFMConv, Grzegorz. "LA INMACULADA, OBRA MAESTRA DE LA CREACIÓN SEGÚN SAN MAXIMILIANO MARÍA KOLBE." Forum Teologiczne, no. 21 (November 6, 2020): 33–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/ft.6080.

Full text
Abstract:
El propósito de este artículo es mostrar cómo San Maksymilian Maria Kolbe (1894–1941) veía la belleza de la creación, especialmente cuando trataba de la persona de María Inmaculada, a la que consideraba una obra maestra de la obra creadora y salvadora de Dios. En la primera parte, se presenta la admiración que sentía San Maximiliano por la creación. Su visión de la creación de Dios se sitúa dentro de la tradición franciscana, arraigada en el amor y el respeto de San Francisco de Asís a todas las criaturas. En la segunda parte, la Virgen Inmaculada es presentada como la creación más perfecta de Dios. San Maximiliano enseña que esta singularidad de María se basa en tres pilares: a) el hecho de haber sido creada (como todo hombre) a imagen y semejanza de Dios; b) otorgándole favores únicos, es decir, el don de la maternidad divina y el privilegio relacionado con la Inmaculada Concepción; c) la respuesta perfecta que María dio al amor de Dios que se expresó en la conformidad de su voluntad con la voluntad de Dios. Es por eso que la Virgen Inmaculada en su belleza sobrenatural es un modelo a seguir para cada ser racional. La última parte ofrece un modelo original de la economía salvadora de Dios. San Maximiliano presenta la obra creadora y salvadora de Dios como la „acción” de la Santísima Trinidad que debe ser acompañada por la „reacción” de las criaturas. El punto de contacto de la „tierra con el cielo” es la Virgen Inmaculada unida al Espíritu Santo. El Padre Kolbe pone de manifiesto la importancia de esta unificación tanto en el misterio de la Encarnación del Hijo de Dios como en el compromiso constante del Divino Paráclito y de la Inmaculada con la vida espiritual diaria de los hombres. El propósito de este compromiso es devolver criaturas racionales a la casa del Padre, es decir, a su Creador.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Dugarzhapova, Z. F., M. A. Ivacheva, M. V. Chesnokova, E. V. Kravets, E. A. Reshetnyak, D. Yu Kuzin, A. A. Umanets, T. N. Detkovskaya, and S. V. Balakhonov. "Antrax in Primorsky Territory (1919–2020). Communication 1. Historical Records and Characteristics of Stationary Potentially Hazardous as Regards Antrax Areas." Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections, no. 3 (October 23, 2021): 51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2021-3-51-59.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of the study was to analyze the state of stationary potentially hazardous areas as regards anthrax in the Primorsky Territory and update the Cadastre of stationary potentially hazardous as regards anthrax areas (SPHA) of the Russian Federation (2005).Materials and methods. The collection and survey of accounting and reporting documents, archival and informational materials, records on anthrax from veterinary institutions, Rospotrebnadzor, municipalities by the 72 registered anthrax SPHA of the Primorsky Territory have been carried out. The reference book of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic’s settlements endemic for anthrax (1976), the Cadastre of the stationary potentially hazardous as regards anthrax areas in the Russian Federation (2005) were used.Results and discussion. The description of anthrax cases in the Primorsky Territory goes back to 1894, the official registration of the disease – since 1919. The last cases of the disease in farm animals and population were noted in Kavalerovsky and Oktyabrsky districts in 1979. When updating the SPHA (2005), information on 82 dormant sites of the Territory in 22 municipal and six urban districts was clarified. In six districts of the Territory, anthrax was not officially registered. Most of the SPHAs are centered on the Khanka plain, where the network of transport routes, the largest number of livestock and population are concentrated. The data on the number of sick animals and people over a period of 1919–1929 have not survived, and in the period between 1980 and 2020 anthrax was not reported in the region. 173 animals and 34 humans were diagnosed with anthrax in 1929–1979 in Primorye. High epizootic activity was noted in the period of 1919–1941. In the Asian part of the Russian Federation, Primorsky Territory belongs to the regions under a mild epizootic and epidemiological disadvantage as regards anthrax. Monitoring of anthrax has shown that the persistence of the pathogen in the soils of ten districts of the Territory could be facilitated by the absence of soil toxicity (86,8 %) and an average nutritional value (23,5 %) in relation to the anthrax microbe.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Damgaard, Jakob, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo Moreira, Masakazu Hayashi, Tom A. Weir, and Herbert Zettel. "Molecular phylogeny of the pond treaders (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Mesoveliidae), discussion of the fossil record and a checklist of species assigned to the family." Insect Systematics & Evolution 43, no. 3-4 (2012): 175–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1876312x04302004.

Full text
Abstract:
The phylogenetic relationships among selected species and genera of Mesoveliidae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) were investigated in a parsimony analysis of 2858 bp of DNA sequence data from the genes encoding COI + II, 16S rRNA and 28S rRNA. The resulting phylogeny showed that Mesoveloidea williamsiHungerford, 1929, from the subfamily Madeoveliinae, was sister group to Mniovelia Andersen & J.T. Polhemus, 1980, from the Mesoveliinae, thus making the latter subfamily paraphyletic. The genus MesoveliaMulsant & Rey, 1852 also showed to be paraphyletic, since an undescribed Laotian relative of M. indicaHorváth, 1915 and M. ujhelyiiLundblad, 1933 resulted as sister group to PhrynoveliaHorváth, 1915; and M. amoenaUhler, 1894 was sister species to Speovelia maritimaEsaki, 1929. Whereas these relationships were poorly or moderately supported, the remaining species of Mesovelia formed two distinct and well-supported clades, one comprising M. horvathiLundblad, 1933, M. hackeriHarris & Drake, 1941, and two undescribed species from Nigeria and New Caledonia, and another comprising M. vittigeraHorváth, 1895, M. stysi J.T. Polhemus & D.A. Polhemus, 2000, M. ebbenielseniAndersen & Weir, 2004, M. furcata Mulsant & Rey, 1952, and M. mulsantiWhite, 1879. A large genetic difference was found between populations of M. vittigera from Europe and Africa on one side and populations from Australia and New Caledonia on the other. DNA sequence data from a Japanese “M. vittigera” obtained from GenBank placed the specimen as strongly supported sister group to a Danish specimen of M. furcata. Comparisons of the 28S rRNA sequence data between the two specimens revealed a single C/T transition, while comparison with a Chinese female of M. furcata revealed one A/G and one C/T transition, thus suggesting mislabelling of the Japanese specimen, or an unrecognized presence of M. furcata in Japan. Considerable genetic differentiation was found between specimens of M. horvathi from Australia, New Caledonia, New Guinea, and Laos, and between sympatric specimens of M. mulsanti from Honduras, thus supporting earlier ideas of species-complexes in these two clades. Samples of Austrovelia caledonicaMalipatil & Monteith, 1983 from New Caledonia and Mniovelia kuscheli Andersen & J.T. Polhemus, 1980 from New Zealand’s North Island also revealed considerable intraspecific divergences indicating genetic isolation among geographically separated populations on these ancient islands.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Koerner, E. F. Konrad. "Wilhelm Von Humboldt and North American Ethnolinguistics." Historiographia Linguistica 17, no. 1-2 (January 1, 1990): 111–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.10koe.

Full text
Abstract:
Summary Noam Chomsky’s frequent references to the work of Wilhelm von Humboldt during the 1960s produced a considerable revival of interest in this 19th-century scholar in North America. This paper demonstrates that there has been a long-standing influence of Humboldt’s ideas on American linguistics and that no ‘rediscovery’ was required. Although Humboldt’s first contacts with North-American scholars goes back to 1803, the present paper is confined to the posthumous phase of his influence which begins with the work of Heymann Steinthal (1823–1899) from about 1850 onwards. This was also a time when many young Americans went to Germany to complete their education; for instance William Dwight Whitney (1827–1894) spent several years at the universities of Tübingen and Berlin (1850–1854), and in his writings on general linguistics one can trace Humboldtian ideas. In 1885 Daniel G. Brinton (1837–1899) published an English translation of a manuscript by Humboldt on the structure of the verb in Amerindian languages. A year later Franz Boas (1858–1942) arrived from Berlin soon to establish himself as the foremost anthropologist with a strong interest in native language and culture. From then on we encounter Humboldtian ideas in the work of a number of North American anthropological linguists, most notably in the work of Edward Sapir (1884–1939). This is not only true with regard to matters of language classification and typology but also with regard to the philosophy of language, specifically, the relationship between a particular language structure and the kind of thinking it reflects or determines on the part of its speakers. Humboldtian ideas of ‘linguistic relativity’, enunciated in the writings of Whitney, Brinton, Boas, and others, were subsequently developed further by Sapir’s student Benjamin Lee Whorf (1897–1941). The transmission of the so-called Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis – which still today is attracting interest among cultural anthropologists and social psychologists, not only in North America – is the focus of the remainder of the paper. A general Humboldtian approach to language and culture, it is argued, is still present in the work of Dell Hymes and several of his students.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Dudek, Jolanta. "Joseph Conrad in the eyes of Kazimierz Wierzyński: Fearless of the Boundless and Familiar with the Infinite." Yearbook of Conrad Studies 16 (July 2, 2024): 21–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/20843941yc.21.002.19292.

Full text
Abstract:
Kazimierz Wierzyński (1894-1969) is now considered to be one of the greatest modern Polish poets. He was born in Drohobycz (which is now in western Ukraine) and studied literature and philosophy in Cracow and Vienna. During the interwar years he lived in Warsaw, after which for several years (1939-1941) he lived as a wartime refugee before spending more than twenty years in the United States. An émigré for the rest of his life, he finally settled in London, where he died in 1969. Wierzyński’s poetry – like the works of Joseph Conrad – exhibits a particular sensibility to nature (perceived as a living organism) and the outside world, which is full of extraordinary places, objects, people and phenomena that invite us to reflect on the deeper meaning of our existence as human beings. Both writers share a stoic response to adversity and a fidelity to conscience and to the heritage of European culture. In his 1924 sketch entitled “Conrad’s Great Silence,” Wierzyński saw Conrad above all as a writer who yearns for the infinite, whose “maritime reflection is reproduced in his work.” Twelve years later, in a narrative poem entitled Lord Jim (forming part of his 1936 collection entitled Kurhany), Wierzyński brought the eponymous character of Conrad’s novel into the pantheon of the Polish collective imagination. The fate of Lord Jim, who is tormented by nostalgia for his native England (to which he cannot return) would seem to foreshadow that of the émigré poet whom Wierzyński himself was soon to become. In the titular poem of Wierzyński’s wartime collection Róża wiatrów (The Wind Rose – 1942), Conrad appears as a “role model” for all Polish wartime refugees and émigrés, who, like castaways, search for their own guiding light “in the Conradian sky” – a light that could help them find a safe haven where they could live and work in their own artistic realm without the need to care about literary fashions. This poem has been translated into English (under the title The Compass Rose) by Mary Phelps (Kazimierz Wierzyński, Selected Poems, New York: Voyages Press, 1959). In the opinion of the author of the present article, this translation fails to correctly convey certain key images and allusions which enrich the meaning of the poem and which connect it with the poet’s own personal situation as an émigré writer.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Lussier, Jean-Martin, Hubert Morin, and Réjean Gagnon. "Comparaison de la croissance de marcottes d'épinette noire (Piceamariana) adultes après coupe à celle d'individus issus de graines après feu." Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22, no. 10 (October 1, 1992): 1524–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x92-203.

Full text
Abstract:
Analysis was performed on 112 stems of black spruce (Piceamariana (Mill.) BSP) from the Réserve faunique des Laurentides to compare the growth in height, DBH, and volume of layers released by clear-cutting to the growth of individuals of comparable age originating from seeds after fire. The sampled stands originated from fires and clear-cuttings that occurred between 1894 and 1941. Stem analysis also permitted the calculation of specific volume increment, which corresponds to the annual volume increment divided by the surface of the cambium. Results show that height, DBH, and volume measured 60 years after clear-cutting were better correlated to the height of the advanced growth at the moment of release (Ho) than to the number of years of suppression. The mean annual increments in height and DBH of released layers were positively related to height at the year of logging when the height was less than 2 m. When layers were taller, mean annual increments in height and DBH were negatively related to initial height. These relationships were however variable, since for two-thirds of the stand's life, the periodic annual increments in height and diameter did not differ significantly (α = 0.05) between small (Ho < 1 m ), medium (1 m ≤ Ho ≤ 2 m), and large second-growth spruces (Ho > 2 m). The superiority of taller layers is consequently due to greater heights before release. Volume growth rate of layers was positively related to initial height until approximately 60 years after clear-cutting. However, no differences in specific volume increment could be associated with initial height. Therefore, the relationship between initial height and volume increment can be attributed to the difference of cambial area between small, medium, and large second-growth spruces. Black spruce originating from seeds had greater height, DBH, and specific volume increments than second-growth trees, until about 50 years after stand origin. Thereafter, growth rates are comparable. Consequently, after 40 years, stands originating from seeds are comparable in height, volume, and DBH to layers that reached between 1 and 2 m in height after clear-cutting. Neither drainage class nor point density had a significant effect on the sampled black spruces. Stem analysis also revealed an important growth reduction that can be associated with the last spruce budworm (Choristoneurafumiferana Clem.) outbreak in the Réserve faunique des Laurentides. We can deduce from the results of this study that the performance of second-growth stands compared with fire-origin stands will mainly depend on the density of the advanced growth and its height structure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Khen, G. V. "HISTORY OF PETER THE GREAT BAY DISCOVER AND OCEANOGRAPHIC SURVEYS IN THE JAPAN SEA TILL THE MIDDLE 20TH CENTURY." Izvestiya TINRO 200 (March 26, 2020): 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2020-200-3-23.

Full text
Abstract:
Peter the Great Bay (PGB) was not known to Europeans for a long time. The first European ship reached PGB in 1852. She was the French corvette Capricieuse commanded by captain G. de Rocquemaurel who was sent by his government for exploring the western coast of the Japan Sea; actually he had described the Posyet Bay only. Later the British HMS Winchester and Barracuda visited PGB in August, 1856. They discovered the Golden Horn Bay, them as Port May, and gave names to many other geographical locations. Large Russian expedition of 7 vessels was sent to Primorye coast under the leadership of N.N. Muravyov-Amursky, the Governor-General of Eastern Siberia, in the summer of 1859. They described thoroughly the entire PGB and changed many (not all) foreign geographical names to Russian ones. Scientific researches in the Japan Sea were started soon by L.I. Schrenk, who summarized the results of Russian observations in two books published in 1869 and 1874. Great success in understanding of oceanographic regime was the work of S.O. Makarov «The «Vitiaz» and the Pacific Ocean» (1894). S. Ogura created in 1927 the general chart of currents in the Japan Sea on the base of Japanese observations in 1900–1911 that was more detailed and comprehensive than the first chart of L.I. Shrenk. Moreover, S. Ogura plotted the water temperature and salinity distribution over the whole Japan Sea for February and August. Oceanographic studies in PGB were made in 1920s by K.A. Gomoyunov, the first professional oceanographer who lived constantly in the Russian Far East; he began from the Amur Bay survey in the summer of 1925. The USSR Hydrographic Office conducted the oceanographic survey in PGB and the Tatar Strait in 1926–1928, with measuring of temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen content, pH, and water transparency, with the deepest measurements at the depth of 3500 m. In 1932, the Pacific Res. Inst. of Fisheries in Vladivostok together with the State Hydrographic Institute in Leningrad organized the large-scale Pacific expedition that covered all Far-Eastern Seas. In the framework of this expedition, the 5 cruises of RV Rossinante to the Japan Sea headed by N.I. Tarasov explored PGB, too, that allowed to analyze seasonal variations of temperature, salinity, oxygen content, and currents. Oceanographic researches in the Japan Sea became more active in the times of WWII, 4 small research vessels made observations at Primorye coast every month from April to October under general supervision of A.M. Batalin; in total, more than 100 exits to the sea were recorded in 1941–1946. The data collected in those years was the basis for the big atlas of the Japan Sea created under the leadership of A.I. Rumyantsev and published in 1951.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Zhorov, Dmitriy, and Nadzeya Lyashchynskaya. "Large Chicory aphid (Uroleucon cichorii (Koch, 1855): Sterrnorhyncha: Aphididae) – Invasive Alien Aphid Species in the Fauna of Belarus." Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University Scientific Bulletin. Series: Biological Sciences, no. 3 (August 22, 2019): 101–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2019-387-101-108.

Full text
Abstract:
Uroleucon cichorii (Insecta: Hemipteroidea: Rhynchota: Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae) is an invasive alien species in the fauna of Belarus. In 1854 the species has been described by C. L. Koch from Germany. For the first time U. cichorii has been noted in Great Britain in 1876, in Estonia – 1894, in Romania – 1896, in Italy – 1900, in Belgium – 1901, in Crimea – 1903, in Latvia – 1924, in Poland –1930, in Netherlands – 1939, in Finland – 1941, in Ukraine – 1945, in France – 1948, in Sweden – 1949, in Norway – 1953, in Denmark – 1954, in Moldavia – 1955, in Austria – 1956, in Czech – 1958, in Hungary – 1959, in Bulgaria – 1960, in European Russia – 1962–1964, in Bosnia and Herzegovina – 1963, in Serbia – 1963, in Lithuania – 1963–1980, in Macedonia – 1964, in Switzerland – 1967, in Spain – 1971, in Sicily –1973, in Corsica – 1973, in Balearic Islands (Mallorca) – 1982, in Belarus – 1986 and Greece – after 1992. It is obvious that this chronological list describes a history of aphidological research rather than spreading of the invider across the European regions. As considered, the species has Mediterranean origin. Outside of Europe the species is known from Near East as well as Central Asia, Korea and North America. As host plants U. cichorii s.str. uses common chicory (Cichorium intibus L.) and related species of Cichorieae (Asteraceae). The species is known as a pest of common chicory (including leaf chicory) and endive. For the first time U. cichorii has been registered in 1986. At present the species is common for C. intibus growing on roadsides and in other ruderal biotopes. During 1986–2018 U. cichorii has been registered in the all regions of the Republic of Belarus. The map of geographic points of registrations is given. It is obvious that the invider’s expansion in the regions of Belarus is finished. The species is holocyclic and monoecious. Feeding on forage plants contributes to the loss of a significant amount of plastic substances, which leads to their dehydration and slow growth, and, as a result, a slight deformation of the stem. U. cichorii does not initiate the deformation of leaf blades and the premature dying off of the inflorescences, and also does not lead to the formation of galls. Perennial data show the appearance of fundatrices from overwintering eggs in the third decade of April – the first decade of May. Further a series of successive parthenogenetic generations and the growth of colonies occur. The winged females are recorded in July–August. The appearance of winged males and normal females occurs in September – the first decade of October. The eggs are deposited in the end of October. The largest peak in the number of U. cichorii registrations occurs in July–August.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Zhorov, Dmitriy, and Nadzeya Lyashchynskaya. "Large Chicory aphid (Uroleucon cichorii (Koch, 1855): Sterrnorhyncha: Aphididae) – Invasive Alien Aphid Species in the Fauna of Belarus." Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University Scientific Bulletin. Series: Biological Sciences, no. 3 (August 22, 2019): 101–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2019-387-3-101-108.

Full text
Abstract:
Uroleucon cichorii (Insecta: Hemipteroidea: Rhynchota: Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae) is an invasive alien species in the fauna of Belarus. In 1854 the species has been described by C. L. Koch from Germany. For the first time U. cichorii has been noted in Great Britain in 1876, in Estonia – 1894, in Romania – 1896, in Italy – 1900, in Belgium – 1901, in Crimea – 1903, in Latvia – 1924, in Poland –1930, in Netherlands – 1939, in Finland – 1941, in Ukraine – 1945, in France – 1948, in Sweden – 1949, in Norway – 1953, in Denmark – 1954, in Moldavia – 1955, in Austria – 1956, in Czech – 1958, in Hungary – 1959, in Bulgaria – 1960, in European Russia – 1962–1964, in Bosnia and Herzegovina – 1963, in Serbia – 1963, in Lithuania – 1963–1980, in Macedonia – 1964, in Switzerland – 1967, in Spain – 1971, in Sicily –1973, in Corsica – 1973, in Balearic Islands (Mallorca) – 1982, in Belarus – 1986 and Greece – after 1992. It is obvious that this chronological list describes a history of aphidological research rather than spreading of the invider across the European regions. As considered, the species has Mediterranean origin. Outside of Europe the species is known from Near East as well as Central Asia, Korea and North America. As host plants U. cichorii s.str. uses common chicory (Cichorium intibus L.) and related species of Cichorieae (Asteraceae). The species is known as a pest of common chicory (including leaf chicory) and endive. For the first time U. cichorii has been registered in 1986. At present the species is common for C. intibus growing on roadsides and in other ruderal biotopes. During 1986–2018 U. cichorii has been registered in the all regions of the Republic of Belarus. The map of geographic points of registrations is given. It is obvious that the invider’s expansion in the regions of Belarus is finished. The species is holocyclic and monoecious. Feeding on forage plants contributes to the loss of a significant amount of plastic substances, which leads to their dehydration and slow growth, and, as a result, a slight deformation of the stem. U. cichorii does not initiate the deformation of leaf blades and the premature dying off of the inflorescences, and also does not lead to the formation of galls. Perennial data show the appearance of fundatrices from overwintering eggs in the third decade of April – the first decade of May. Further a series of successive parthenogenetic generations and the growth of colonies occur. The winged females are recorded in July–August. The appearance of winged males and normal females occurs in September – the first decade of October. The eggs are deposited in the end of October. The largest peak in the number of U. cichorii registrations occurs in July–August.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Andreev, Alex Alexeevich, and Anton Petrovich Ostroushko. "Nikolay Nikolaevich ELANSKY - outstanding surgeon, organizer of military field surgery, honored scientist of the RSFSR (to the 125th of birthday)." Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery 12, no. 2 (March 29, 2019): 147. http://dx.doi.org/10.18499/2070-478x-2019-12-2-147-147.

Full text
Abstract:
N.N. Elansky was born in 1894 in the Voronezh Province. In 1913 he graduated from the Borisoglebsk gymnasium, in 1917 - the Military Medical Academy and was sent to the South-Western Front as a senior regimental doctor. Since 1918 - the district doctor of the Makaryevsky rural hospital of the Voronezh province. In 1919, N.N. Yelansky, together with V.N. Shamov and I.R. Petrov, prepared the first standard serums in the USSR for determining blood groups. Since 1921, Nikolai Nikolayevich returned to the faculty surgical clinic of the Military Medical Academy, having passed the way from an intern to a senior lecturer. In 1924, he defended his doctoral dissertation, in 1932 - became a professor, in 1934 - head of the department of faculty surgery at the Leningrad Pediatric Institute. In the years 1937-1938. He headed the Department of General Surgery and Military Field Surgery of the Military Medical Academy. Nikolai Nikolayevich participated in the organization of surgical care on the Khalkhin-Gol River (1938) and in the Soviet-Finnish War (1939–1940). During the Great Patriotic War, N.N. Yelansky consistently served as chief surgeon of the North-West, 2nd Byelorussian, 2nd Ukrainian and Trans-Baikal fronts. After the war, Nikolai Nikolayevich continued to work as head of the department of general surgery. In 1942, on the initiative of N.N. Yelansky was created by a special front-line group with the aim of a comprehensive study of traumatic shock. In 1942 he was awarded the title Honored Scientist of the RSFSR. In 1944, N.N. Elansky became lieutenant-general of the medical service. From 1947 to 1955 He was the chief surgeon of the Soviet Army and at the same time the head of the department of faculty surgery I of the Moscow Medical Institute. N.M. Sechenov, which he headed until 1964. From 1955 to 1959 he was a professor and consultant of the Military Medical Administration. He studied specific issues of blood transfusion, gastro-surgery, urology, traumatology, oncology and neurosurgery. In 1959 N.N. Yelansky organizes an artificial kidney department in the faculty surgical clinic I of the Moscow Medical Institute for the treatment of patients with acute renal failure. Nikolay Nikolayevich was a member of the editorial board of the Surgery and Military Medical Journal journals. He edited the 15th and 16th volumes of the multivolume work "The Experience of Soviet Medicine in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945."He was the editor of the Surgery department of the 2nd edition of the Big Medical Encyclopedia, etc. He was a member of the board of the All-Union and All-Russian Scientific Surgical Societies, an honorary member of the International Association of Surgeons, the Surgical Society. N.I. Pirogov, Surgical Society of Czechoslovakia, Vice-President of the Society of Soviet-Belgian Friendship. He trained 9 doctors and over 30 candidates of medical sciences. He has published about 140 scientific papers. For services to the motherland N.N. Elansky was awarded fifteen orders and medals of the Soviet Union. N.N. Elansky died on August 31, 1964 and was buried in Moscow at the Novodevichy Cemetery.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Odil, Jones U. "INDIGENOUS AGENTS AND THE SCHOOL APOSTOLATE IN UKWUANILAND, 1841–1941." Oral History Journal of South Africa 3, no. 2 (October 11, 2016): 69–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/2309-5792/339.

Full text
Abstract:
In the 19th century, colonial educational policy reflected the hesitant approach of Britain to a field recognised in those days as the reserve of religious bodies, and for many years the missionary societies had the field of education to themselves. Education in C.M.S. mission schools in Nigeria received no aids in grants from the colonial government. This article is a historical reconstruction, which brings to light the well-articulated contributions of local people in their attempt to establish and fund schools using indigenous initiatives, personnel and resources. Resting on the self-propagating, self-supporting and self-governing policy of Henry Venn, the study reveals that, although the establishment of schools in Ukwuaniland 1841–1894 was originally the outcome of the expression of local needs, efforts and ideas, the Anglican churches there saw in them an agency for promoting evangelism. This article, an important contribution in the area of the history of religion and education, recommends that local initiatives, needs and aspirations should be taken into consideration in the formulation of education policy in Nigeria.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Fernandes, Mário Gonçalves, and Helder Trigo Gomes Marques. "Thematic cartography of Portuguese winegrowing (1850–1952)." Abstracts of the ICA 1 (July 15, 2019): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-77-2019.

Full text
Abstract:
<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> In Portugal, in the historical cartography of viticulture, there are two important phases in which the use of cartography was recurrent: the first was essentially at the beginning of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, when the surveys and publications of the base cartography were consolidated, until the fall of the monarchical regime; the second began with the phase of political affirmation of the Estado Novo, and ended in the fifties of the last century.</p><p> From the cartographic documents elaborated in both phases we present a consolidated contribution, concluding a large research project on the history of the cartography of the vine and wine, with which new elements are added to the history of Portuguese thematic cartography. Thus, the whole discourse is based on the autorts and on the known history of Portuguese cartography and results from the analysis and contextualization of dozens of cartographic documents published between 1867 and 1952, namely:</p><p> 1867 - AGUIAR, Antonio Augusto, Visita às principaes comarcas vinhateiras no Centro do Reino no anno de 1866”, in “Memoria sobre os processos de vinificação a empregar nos principaes centros vinhateiros do Continente do Reino”, Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional, entre pp. 62-63.</p><p> 1890 - PÉRY, Gerardo Augusto, “Estatistica Agricola, Producção Vinicola de Portugal e Ilhas Adjacentes (Producção Approximada Media), 1884-1888”, Direcção dos Trabalhos da Carta Agrícola e Inspecção de Estatistica Agrícola, 31 de Janeiro de 1890. Lisboa, Boletim da Direcção Geral da Agricultura, 1890, nº 2, Fevereiro, pp. 244-249.</p><p> 1890 - MARÇAL, Ramiro Larcher, “Relatorio Geral do Anno de 1888, pelo agronomo chefe da 6ª região agronomica Ramiro Larcher Marçal”, Lisboa, Boletim da Direcção Geral da Agricultura, 1890, nº 12, Dezembro, pp. 1197-1248.</p><p> 1891 - MARÇAL, Ramiro Larcher, Relatorio do agronomo subalterno da 6ª região” (1890), “6ª região agronomica, inspecção geral às vinhas em 1889”, Lisboa, Boletim da Direcção Geral da Agricultura, 1890, nº 9, Setembro, pp. 997-1015</p><p> 1891 - GONDIM, Manuel Rodrigues, “Circunscripção do Norte – Inspecção da Agricultura. Relatorio de inspecção às vinhas em 1888”. Lisboa, Boletim da Direcção Geral da Agricultura, 1891, nº 4, Abril, pp. 312-330.</p><p> 1892 - BARROS, Alfredo de V. V. Corrêa, ”Relatório da inspecção da Agricultura”, Lisboa, Boletim da Direcção Geral da Agricultura, 1890, nº 9, Setembro, pp. 1087-1144.</p><p> 1892 - RAMALHO, António Gomes (agrónomo chefe da 8ª repartição), “Serviços agrícolas regionais. Relatório do agrónomo chefe da 8ª região agronómica sobre serviços agrícolas e phylloxericos, no anno de 1891”, Lisboa, Boletim da Direcção Geral da Agricultura, 1892, nº 12, Dezembro, pp. 1169-1212.</p><p> 1893 - BARROS, Alfredo de V. V. Corrêa, “Recosntituição da vinha Europea pela enxertia sobre cepas americanas”, Lisboa, Boletim da Direcção Geral da Agricultura, 1893, 5º anno, nº 12, Dezembro, pp. 937-1056.</p><p> 1894 - MENEZES, José Taveira Carvalho Pinto, “Considerações acerca da produção vinícola do Norte de Portugal em 1892”, Porto, Direcção Geral dos Serviços Ampeleográficos (manuscrito depositado na Biblioteca da Comissão de Viticultura dos Vinhos Verdes).</p><p> 1900 - COSTA, B. C. Cincinnato da e CASTRO, D. Luiz de (coords.), Portugal au point de vue agricole, Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional.</p><p> 1941 - GIRÃO, Aristides de Amorim (1941, 2ª edição 1958), Atlas de Portugal. Coimbra: Gráfica de Coimbra (texto) e Lito-Coimbra (mapas). Publicação comemorativa do duplo centenário.</p><p> 1942 - JUNTA NACIONAL DO VINHO (1942), Contribuição para o Cadastro dos Vinhos Portugueses na Área de Influência da J. N. V., Vols. I e II. Lisboa, Ministério da Economia, Tipografia Ramos, Afonso e Moita, Lda., dezembro de 1943.</p><p> 1950 - MIGUEL, Américo C., “Generalidades sobre o custo de produção do vinho. Método da conta de cultura total (O caso de Almeirim)”, Lisboa, Anais da Junta Nacional do Vinho, Vol. II, pp. 159-299.</p><p> 1950 - MIGUEL, Américo C. e GODINHO, Mário Falcão, “Carta Vinícola de Portugal”, Lisboa, Anais da Junta Nacional do Vinho, Vol. II, pp. 301-316.</p><p> 1951 - OLIVEIRA, Rogério V., “O custo de produção do vinho no concelho de Torres Vedras, sua determinação pelo método da ‘conta de cultura total’”, Lisboa, Anais da Junta Nacional do Vinho, Vol. III, pp. 185-289.</p><p> - “Concelho de Torres Vedras, Carta Vitícola”, s/autor, escala gráfica (aprox. 1:150.000), 28x23 cm, entre pp. 200- 201.</p><p> 1952 - MIGUEL, Américo C. e OLIVEIRA, Rogério V., “Planificação de uma rede de adegas cooperativas para a área da jurisdição da Junta Nacional do Vinho”, Lisboa, Anais da Junta Nacional do Vinho, Vol. IV, pp. 95-369.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Bouchard, Patrice, Yves Bousquet, Rolf L. Aalbu, Miguel A. Alonso-Zarazaga, Ottó Merkl, and Anthony E. Davies. "Review of genus-group names in the family Tenebrionidae (Insecta, Coleoptera)." ZooKeys 1050 (July 26, 2021): 1–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1050.64217.

Full text
Abstract:
A review of genus-group names for darkling beetles in the family Tenebrionidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) is presented. A catalogue of 4122 nomenclaturally available genus-group names, representing 2307 valid genera (33 of which are extinct) and 761 valid subgenera, is given. For each name the author, date, page number, gender, type species, type fixation, current status, and first synonymy (when the name is a synonym) are provided. Genus-group names in this family are also recorded in a classification framework, along with data on the distribution of valid genera and subgenera within major biogeographical realms. A list of 535 unavailable genus-group names (e.g., incorrect subsequent spellings) is included. Notes on the date of publication of references cited herein are given, when known. The following genera and subgenera are made available for the first time: Anemiadena Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Cheirodes Gené, 1839), Armigena Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Nesogena Mäklin, 1863), Debeauxiella Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Hyperops Eschscholtz, 1831), Hyperopsis Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Hyperops Eschscholtz, 1831), Linio Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Nilio Latreille, 1802), Matthewsotys Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, gen. nov., Neosolenopistoma Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Eurynotus W. Kirby, 1819), Paragena Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Nesogena Mäklin, 1863), Paulianaria Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, gen. nov., Phyllechus Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, gen. nov., Prorhytinota Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Rhytinota Eschscholtz, 1831), Pseudorozonia Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Rozonia Fairmaire, 1888), Pseudothinobatis Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, gen. nov., Rhytinopsis Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Thalpophilodes Strand, 1942), Rhytistena Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Rhytinota Eschscholtz, 1831), Spinosdara Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Osdara Walker, 1858), Spongesmia Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Adesmia Fischer, 1822), and Zambesmia Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Adesmia Fischer, 1822). The names Adeps Gistel, 1857 and Adepsion Strand, 1917 syn. nov. [= Tetraphyllus Laporte &amp; Brullé, 1831], Asyrmatus Canzoneri, 1959 syn. nov. [= Pystelops Gozis, 1910], Euzadenos Koch, 1956 syn. nov. [= Selenepistoma Dejean, 1834], Gondwanodilamus Kaszab, 1969 syn. nov. [= Conibius J.L. LeConte, 1851], Gyrinodes Fauvel, 1897 syn. nov. [= Nesotes Allard, 1876], Helopondrus Reitter, 1922 syn. nov. [= Horistelops Gozis, 1910], Hybonotus Dejean, 1834 syn. nov. [= Damatris Laporte, 1840], Iphthimera Reitter, 1916 syn. nov. [= Metriopus Solier, 1835], Lagriomima Pic, 1950 syn. nov. [= Neogria Borchmann, 1911], Orphelops Gozis, 1910 syn. nov. [= Nalassus Mulsant, 1854], Phymatium Billberg, 1820 syn. nov. [= Cryptochile Latreille, 1828], Prosoblapsia Skopin &amp; Kaszab, 1978 syn. nov. [= Genoblaps Bauer, 1921], and Pseudopimelia Gebler, 1859 syn. nov. [= Lasiostola Dejean, 1834] are established as new synonyms (valid names in square brackets). Anachayus Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, nom. nov. is proposed as a replacement name for Chatanayus Ardoin, 1957, Genateropa Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Apterogena Ardoin, 1962, Hemipristula Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Hemipristis Kolbe, 1903, Kochotella Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Millotella Koch, 1962, Medvedevoblaps Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Protoblaps G.S. Medvedev, 1998, and Subpterocoma Bouchard &amp; Bousquet, nom. nov. is proposed as a replacement name for Pseudopimelia Motschulsky, 1860. Neoeutrapela Bousquet &amp; Bouchard, 2013 is downgraded to a subgenus (stat. nov.) of Impressosora Pic, 1952. Anchomma J.L. LeConte, 1858 is placed in Stenosini: Dichillina (previously in Pimeliinae: Anepsiini); Entypodera Gerstaecker, 1871, Impressosora Pic, 1952 and Xanthalia Fairmaire, 1894 are placed in Lagriinae: Lagriini: Statirina (previously in Lagriinae: Lagriini: Lagriina); Loxostethus Triplehorn, 1962 is placed in Diaperinae: Diaperini: Diaperina (previously in Diaperinae: Diaperini: Adelinina); Periphanodes Gebien, 1943 is placed in Stenochiinae: Cnodalonini (previously in Tenebrioninae: Helopini); Zadenos Laporte, 1840 is downgraded to a subgenus (stat. nov.) of the older name Selenepistoma Dejean, 1834. The type species [placed in square brackets] of the following available genus-group names are designated for the first time: Allostrongylium Kolbe, 1896 [Allostrongylium silvestre Kolbe, 1896], Auristira Borchmann, 1916 [Auristira octocostata Borchmann, 1916], Blapidocampsia Pic, 1919 [Campsia pallidipes Pic, 1918], Cerostena Solier, 1836 [Cerostena deplanata Solier, 1836], Coracostira Fairmaire, 1899 [Coracostira armipes Fairmaire, 1899], Dischidus Kolbe, 1886 [Helops sinuatus Fabricius, 1801], Eccoptostoma Gebien, 1913 [Taraxides ruficrus Fairmaire, 1894], Ellaemus Pascoe, 1866 [Emcephalus submaculatus Brême, 1842], Epeurycaulus Kolbe, 1902 [Epeurycaulus aldabricus Kolbe, 1902], Euschatia Solier, 1851 [Euschatia proxima Solier, 1851], Heliocaes Bedel, 1906 [Blaps emarginata Fabricius, 1792], Hemipristis Kolbe, 1903 [Hemipristis ukamia Kolbe, 1903], Iphthimera Reitter, 1916 [Stenocara ruficornis Solier, 1835], Isopedus Stein, 1877 [Helops tenebrioides Germar, 1813], Malacova Fairmaire, 1898 [Malacova bicolor Fairmaire, 1898], Modicodisema Pic, 1917 [Disema subopaca Pic, 1912], Peltadesmia Kuntzen, 1916 [Metriopus platynotus Gerstaecker, 1854], Phymatium Billberg, 1820 [Pimelia maculata Fabricius, 1781], Podoces Péringuey, 1886 [Podoces granosula Péringuey, 1886], Pseuduroplatopsis Pic, 1913 [Borchmannia javana Pic, 1913], Pteraulus Solier, 1848 [Pteraulus sulcatipennis Solier, 1848], Sciaca Solier, 1835 [Hylithus disctinctus Solier, 1835], Sterces Champion, 1891 [Sterces violaceipennis Champion, 1891] and Teremenes Carter, 1914 [Tenebrio longipennis Hope, 1843]. Evidence suggests that some type species were misidentified. In these instances, information on the misidentification is provided and, in the following cases, the taxonomic species actually involved is fixed as the type species [placed in square brackets] following requirements in Article 70.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: Accanthopus Dejean, 1821 [Tenebrio velikensis Piller &amp; Mitterpacher, 1783], Becvaramarygmus Masumoto, 1999 [Dietysus nodicornis Gravely, 1915], Heterophaga Dejean, 1834 [Opatrum laevigatum Fabricius, 1781], Laena Dejean, 1821, [Scaurus viennensis Sturm, 1807], Margus Dejean, 1834 [Colydium castaneum Herbst, 1797], Pachycera Eschscholtz, 1831 [Tenebrio buprestoides Fabricius, 1781], Saragus Erichson, 1842 [Celibe costata Solier, 1848], Stene Stephens, 1829 [Colydium castaneum Herbst, 1797], Stenosis Herbst, 1799 [Tagenia intermedia Solier, 1838] and Tentyriopsis Gebien, 1928 [Tentyriopsis pertyi Gebien, 1940]. The following First Reviser actions are proposed to fix the precedence of names or nomenclatural acts (rejected name or act in square brackets): Stenosis ciliaris Gebien, 1920 as the type species for Afronosis G.S. Medvedev, 1995 [Stenosis leontjevi G.S. Medvedev, 1995], Alienoplonyx Bremer, 2019 [Alienolonyx], Amblypteraca Mas-Peinado, Buckley, Ruiz &amp; García-París, 2018 [Amplypteraca], Caenocrypticoides Kaszab, 1969 [Caenocripticoides], Deriles Motschulsky, 1872 [Derilis], Eccoptostira Borchmann, 1936 [Ecoptostira], †Eodromus Haupt, 1950 [†Edromus], Eutelus Solier, 1843 [Lutelus], Euthriptera Reitter, 1893 [Enthriptera], Meglyphus Motschulsky, 1872 [Megliphus], Microtelopsis Koch, 1940 [Extetranosis Koch, 1940, Hypermicrotelopsis Koch, 1940], Neandrosus Pic, 1921 [Neoandrosus], Nodosogylium Pic, 1951 [Nodosogilium], Notiolesthus Motschulsky, 1872 [Notiolosthus], Pseudeucyrtus Pic, 1916 [Pseudocyrtus], Pseudotrichoplatyscelis Kaszab, 1960 [Pseudotrichoplatynoscelis and Pseudotrichoplatycelis], Rhydimorpha Koch, 1943 [Rhytimorpha], Rhophobas Motschulsky, 1872 [Rophobas], Rhyssochiton Gray, 1831 [Ryssocheton and Ryssochiton], Sphaerotidius Kaszab, 1941 [Spaerotidius], Stira Agassiz, 1846 (Mollusca) [Stira Agassiz, 1846 (Coleoptera)], Sulpiusoma Ferrer, 2006 [Sulpiosoma] and Taenobates Motschulsky, 1872 [Taeniobates]. Supporting evidence is provided for the conservation of usage of Cyphaleus Westwood, 1841 nomen protectum over Chrysobalus Boisduval, 1835 nomen oblitum.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Kusyi, Lesia. "Volodymyr Doroshenko about the development of the Shevchenko Scien¬tific Society Library under Soviet rule: illusions and realities (1940–1941)." Proceedings of Vasyl Stefanyk National Scientific Library of Ukraine in Lviv, no. 13(29) (2021): 248–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.37222/2524-0315-2021-13(29)-15.

Full text
Abstract:
The library of the Shevchenko Scientific Society in Lviv was founded in 1894 by the Shevchenko Scientific Society. This is the first and for a long¬time the only scientific collection of Ukrainian studies in Ukraine. Its leaders I. Krevetsky and V. Doroshenko were prominent librarians and bibliographers. The library collected all the most important Ukrainian and foreign publica¬tions about Ukraine, conducted an intensive international book exchange. In 1939, the library had 72,828 titles of books in 207,923 volumes and issues, 1,485 manuscripts and 2,449 maps. In addition, there were about 50,000 doub¬lets and tens of thousands of unlisted books. According to I. Franko’s will, his library and archive, which numbered 6,000 volumes and 500 manuscripts, were given to the SSS Library as a special value. After the accession of Western Ukraine to the Soviet Union in February 1940, it became part of the Lviv branch of the library of the USSR Academy of Sciences, which was subordinated to the Library of the Academy of Science in Kyiv. The director of the library, Volodymyr Doroshenko, hoped that the new government and Kyiv leadership would understand the importance of this unique Ukrainian book collection. The article highlights the desire of V. Doroshenko to preserve the integrity of the institution in the new conditions and its national character. The director’s efforts to enrich the composition of library book collections are reflected. The reasons and circumstances of the structural changes that the library underwent when it became a department of Ukrainian literature and language are highlighted. On the basis of archival sources, the striking losses of the institution’s funds as a result of planned systematic purges by the Bolshevik censorship bodies and the distribution of the SSS Library funds to the newly created departments of the Lviv branch of the Academy of Sciences are shown. Thus, on the example of this book collection the results of the Soviet library policy aimed at destroying the cultural heritage of the Uk¬rainian people are shown. Keywords: Volodymyr Doroshenko, Shevchenko Scientific Society Library in Lviv, Lviv branch of the library of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, library censorship, Soviet library politics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Нуржанов, Арнабай Абишевич. "АРХИТЕКТУРНЫЙ ДЕКОР ДРЕВНИХ ТЮРОК ЖЕТЫСУ (VIII−XIII ВВ.)." Археология Евразийских степей, no. 3 (July 27, 2021): 218–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.24852/2587-6112.2021.3.218.230.

Full text
Abstract:
В предлагаемой статье описывается архитектурный декор древних тюрок Жетысу на примере средневекового города Кулан. Образование и развитие городов в Средней Азии и на территории Казахстана при всех общих закономерностях имело свои особенности. Этот вывод особенно важен для средневекового Казахстана, где формирование городских центров происходило в условиях исторически сложившегося взаимодействия оседло-земледельческого и кочевого населения, что сказалось на топографии и типах городов, своеобразии городской культуры Резная глина, украшавшая интерьеры монументальных построек в средневековых городах Жетысу (Семиречья), представляет собой уникальный материал. Общепринято считать, что она была способом выражения религиозных, мифологических и, возможно, светских сторон мировоззрения. Для некоторых культур в решении вопросов идеологии и искусства резная глина является одним из основных источников, так как иные источники либо отсутствуют, либо слишком фрагментарны. Библиографические ссылки Байпаков К.М., Терновая Г.А. Архитектурные особенности, декор и культовая принадлежность некоторых помещений дворцового комплекса города Джамукат // Изв. МОН РК НАН РК. Серия общ. наук. 2002. № 1. С. 219−222. Бартольд В.В. Отчет о поездке в Среднюю Азию с научной целью. 1893-1894 гг. // Сочинения. T. IV. М.: Наука, 1963. С. 21−91. Бартольд В.В. Очерк Семиречья // Сочинения. T. II. Ч. I. М.: Изд-во восточной литературы, 1963. С. 23−108. Бартольд В.В. К вопросу об оссуариях Туркестанского Края // Сочинения. Т. IV. М.: Наука, 1966. С. 154–171. Баялиева Т.Д. Доисламские верования и их пережитки у киргизов. Фрунзе: Илим, 1972. 170 c. Волин С.Л. Сведения арабских источников IX-XVI вв. о долине реки Талас и смежных районах // Труды Института истории, археологии и этнографии. Т. VIII. Алмат-Ата: изд-во Академии наук Казахской ССР, 1960. C. 72−92. Героические сказания, записанные от народного сказителя Н.У. Улагашева / Ред. А. Коптелов. Горно-Алтайск: Горно-Алтайское книжное издательство, 1961. 222 с. Гордлевский В.А. Из османской демонологии // Избранные сочинения. Т. III. История и культура. М.: Восточная литература, 1962. С. 299–325. Зуев Ю.А. Древнетюркские генеалогические предания как источник по ранней истории тюрков. Диcс. …канд.ист.наук. Алма-Ата, 1967. 200 с. Иванова В.В. Волк охраняющий и волк нападающий // Бестиарий II. Зооморфизмы Азии: движение во времени / Отв. ред. М. А. Родионов. РАН. Санкт-Петербург: Музей антропологии и этнографии им. Петра Великого (Кунсткамера), 2012. C. 91−98. История Киргизской ССР. Т.1. С древнейших времен до середины XIX в. / Гл. ред. В.М. Плоских. Фрунзе: Кыргызстан. 1984. 798 с. Киселев С.В. Древняя история Южной Сибири / МИА. № 9. Л.: АН СССР, 1949. 364 с. Король Г.Г. Мотивы летящей птицы и крылатой богиги в средневековой торевтике и традиционное наследие народов Саяно-Алтая // Мировоззрение населения Южной Сибири и Центральной Азии в исторической ретроспективе. Вып. VIII. / Отв. ред. П.К. Дашковский. Барнаул: АлтГУ, 2015. С. 47−63. Кучукова Д.А. Зооморфные образы в мифологии северных алтайцев: к проблеме этнокультурных контактов народов Сибири // Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. 2013. № 2. С. 21−26. Кычанов Е.И. Кочевые государства от гуннов до маньчжуров. М.: Восточная литература РАН, 1997. 320 с. Лунина С.Б. Резная глина в Средней Азии // История и археология Средней Азии / Ред. О.В. Обельченко, Д.М. Овезов, Т. Ходжаниязов. Ашхабад: Ылым, 1978. С. 203−211. Льюис Р. Османская Турция. Быт. Религия. Культура. М.: Центрполиграф, 2004. 239 с. Нуржанов А.А. О культе волка в традициях народов Евразии // Культурное наследие Евразии (с древности до наших дней) / Отв. ред. Б.А. Байтанаев. Алматы: Институт археологии, 2016. С. 216−227. Нуржанов А.А. Терракотовые персонажи из городища Кулан // Вестник Казахского государственного университета им. аль-Фараби. Серия историческая. 2003. №2 (29). С. 115−118. Орус-оол С.М. Тувинские героические сказания (текстология, поэтика, стиль). М.: МАКС Пресс, 2001. 424 с. Пугаченкова Г.Н., Ремпель Л.И. История искусств Узбекистана с древнейших времен до середины XIX в. М.: Искусство. 1965. 688 c. Радлов В.В. Из Сибири. М.: Наука, 1989. 718 с. Ремпель Л.И. Архитектурный орнамент Узбекистана: история развития и теория построения. Ташкент: Изд-во худ. лит. Уз ССР, 1961. 606 с. Ремпель Л.И. Портрет в искусстве античной Средней Азии // Античные и раннесредневековые древности южного Узбекистана. В свете новых открытий Узбекистанской искусствоведческой экспедиции / Отв. ред. Г. А. Пугаченкова. Ташкент: «Фан» Узбекской ССР, 1989. С. 111−131. Серебрякова М.Н. К вопросу об истоках и эволюции традиционного мировоззрения турок // Традиционное мировоззрение народов Передней Азии / Отв. ред. М. А. Родионов, М. Н. Серебрякова. М.: Наука, 1992. С. 61–94. Серебрякова М.Н. О некоторых представлениях, связанных с семейно-обрядовой практикой сельских турок // Символика культов и ритуалов народов зарубежной Азии / Ред. Жуковская Н. Л., Страганович Г.Г. М.: Наука, 1980. С. 165–177. Толстов С.П. Пережитки тотемизма и дуальной организации у туркмен // Проблемы истории докапиталистических обществ. 1935. №9−10. С. 3−41. Тучкова Н.А. Гл. 7. Мировоззрение. Мифология. Культ // Народы Западной Сибири. Ханты. Манси. Селькупы. Ненцы. Энцы. Нганасаны. Кеты / Отв. ред. И. Н. Гемуев, В. И. Молодин, З. П. Соколова. М.: Наука, 2005. С. 368−377. Улагашев Н.У. Алтай-Бучай. Ойротский народный эпос. Новосибирск. 1941. 407 с. Ушницкий В.В. Генеалогические легенды древних тюрков-ашина: волчица и олень-лань в образе тотемных предков // Проблемы востоковедения, 2016. № 3 (73). С. 30−35. Шинжин И.Б. Тропой, проложенной веками: жизнь и творчество сказительницы Н.П. Черноевой. Горно-Алтайск: ГАИТИ. 1997. 20 с. Araz R. Harput’ta eski türk inançları ve halk hekimliği. Ankara, 1995. Beydili C. Türk Mitolojisi Ansiklopedik Sözlük. Ankara, 2005. С. 352–353. Erbek M. Çatalhöyük’ten günümüze Anadolu motifl eri. Ankara, 2002. Kalafat Y. Doğu Anadolu’da eski Türk inançlarının izleri. Ankara, 1995. С. 98. Yazıcı K. Kurt dede kavramının tarihi ve kültürümüz içindeki yeri. URL: http://www.gulenkoyu.com/forum/index.php?topic=2364.0;wap2 (дата обращения: 15.09.2011).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Ақымбек, Ералы Шардарбекұлы, and Мамбет Сапарбекович Шагирбаев. "ШУ-ТАЛАС ӨҢІРЛЕРІНДЕГІ ОРТАҒАСЫРЛЫҚ ТӨРТКҮЛДЕРДІҢ ЗЕРТТЕЛУ ТАРИХЫ." Kazakhstan Archeology, no. 1 (March 20, 2019): 43–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.52967/akz2019.1.3.43.60.

Full text
Abstract:
Мақала Қазақстанның оңтүстік-шығыс бөлігінде орналасқан ортағасырлық төрткүлдердің зерттелу тарихына арналады. Аталған аймақ бойынша ХІХ ғ. бастап бүгінгі күнге дейінгі төрткүл типтес ескерткіштер туралы зерттеушілердің келтіргенмәліметтері толық беріледі. Әрбір зерттеушінің төрткүлдердің көлемі, топографиясы, жазба деректердегі ескерткіштермен баламалануы, атқарған қызметі және т.б. жайлы жазған мәліметтері жеке талданады. Ф.Д. Городецкий, Б.Н. Дублицкий секілді зерттеушілердің архив қорында сақталған қолжазбаларындағы төрткүл тәріздес ескерткіштерді сипаттауының кейбір ерекшеліктері жеке талқыланады. Д.Ф. Винник, П.П. Иванов, А.Н. Бернштам және т.б. зерттеушелірдің төрткүл типтес ескерткіштерді топтауда негізге алған ерекшеліктердің маңыздылығы қарастырылады. К.М. Байпақов, М.Е. Елеуов, Р. Сала., Ж.-М. Деом секілді ғалымдардың төрткүлдерге жүргізген зерттеулерінің ерекшеліктері сараланып, жалпы төрткүл типтес ескерткіштерді жеке қарастырудағы ұстанған мақсаттары анықталады. Төрткүл типтес ескерткіштерді зерттеген ғалымдардың «төрткүл» атауы мен олар туралы тұжырымдары жайында қызықты деректері мен ғылыми қорытындылары айтылып өтеді. Библиографические ссылки 1. Абрамов Н.А. Алматы или укрепление Верное с его окрестностями // Записи РГО по общей географии. 1867. С. 255-258. 2. Авдусин Д.А. Полевая археология СССР. М.: Высш. школа, 1980. 335 с. 3. Авизова А.Қ. Археология: Оқу құралы. Алматы: Эверо, 2014. 220 б. 4. Агеева Е.И. Некоторые новые данные по археологии Семиречья // КСИИМК. 1960. Вып. 80. С. 68-69. 5. Ақымбек Е.Ш. Шу өңірінің ежелгі және ортағасырлық керамикасы (Қордай ауданы материалдары бойынша). Алматы: Ә.Х. Марғұлан атындағы Археология институты, 2017. 112 б., ил. 6. Байпаков К.М., Савельева Т.В., Чанг К. Средневековые города и поселения Северо-восточного Жетысу. Алматы: Credo, 2005. 188 с. 7. Байпаков К.М. Средневековые города и поселения Семиречья (VI-XII вв.): автореф. дис. ... канд. ист. наук. Алма-Ата, 1966. 22 с. 8. Бартольд В. В. Отчет о поездке в Среднюю Азию с научной целью в 1893-1894 гг. Москва: Наука, 1966. Т. IV. 497 с. 9. Берг Л.С. Предварительный отчет об исследовании озера Балхаш летом 1903 г. Избранные труды. Средняя Азия. Москва: изд-во АН СССР, 1960. Т. 3. 552 с. 10. Бернштам А.Н. Памятники старины Таласской долины. Историко-археологический очерк. Алма-Ата: КазОГИЗ, 1941. 87 с. 11. Бернштам А.Н. Труды Семиреченской археологической экспедиции «Чуйская долина» // МИА. М.-Ленинград: изд-во АН СССР, 1950. № 14. 249 с. 12. Валиханов Ч.Ч. О кригиз-кайсацких могилах (молах) и древностях вообще / Собрание сочинений в пяти томах. Т. 1. Алма-Ата: Гл. ред. Казахской советской энциклопедии, 1984. 432 с. 13. Винник Д.Ф. К исторической топографии средневековых поселений Иссык Кульской котловины // Древняя и раннесредневековая культура Киргизстана. Фрунзе: Илим, 1967. С. 91-113. 14. Городецкий Ф.Д. Древности Семиреченской (Джетысуйской) области. 1924 г. // Архив ИА КН МОН РК, ф. 2, оп. 2, д. 4. 15. Диваев А.А. Киргизская легенде о постройке Акыр-Таша // Протоколы заседаний и сообщений членов Туркестанского кружка любителей археологии. Историко-культурные памятники Казахстана / Авт. предисл. и сост. Елеуов М., Бахтыбаев М.М. Туркестан: Туран, 2011. С. 355-356. 16. Дневники Джамбулской археологический экспедиций. 1939-1940 гг. // Архив ИА КН МОН РК, ф. 2, оп. 2, д. 39. 17. Дублицкий Б.Н. Хроника археологических разведок и находок на территории Казахской ССР 1928–1938 гг. // Архив ИА КН МОН РК, ф. 2, оп. 2, д. 27. 18. Елеуов М. Шу-Талас өңірлерінің ортағасырлық қалалары мен мекендері (VІ–ХІІІ ғ. басы): тарих ғыл. докторы ... дис. Алматы, 1999. 360 б. 19. Иванов П.П. Материалы по археологии котловины Иссык-Куля // Труды Института истории АН Кирг. ССР. Фрунзе, 1957. Вып. III. С. 65-99. 20. Каллаур В.А. Древние местности Аулиеатинскогоуезда на старом караванном пути из Тараза (Таласа) в восточной Туркестан // Протоколы заседаний и сообщений членов Туркестанского кружка любителей археологии. Историко-культурные памятники Казахстана / Авт. предисл. и сост. Елеуов М., Бахтыбаев М.М. Туркестан: Туран, 2011. С. 78-85. 21. Кожемяко П.Н. Оседлые поселение Таласской долины // Археологические памятники Таласской долины. Фрунзе: Изд-во АН Кирг ССР, 1963. С. 145-171. 22. Кожемяко П.Н. Раннесредневековые города и поселения Чуйской долины. Фрунзе: Типография АН Кирг.ССР, 1959. 184 с. 23. Лаврентьев В.П. Краткий перечень бугров (курганов) находящихся в черте г. Аулие-ата // Протоколы заседаний и сообщений членов Туркестанского кружка любителей археологии. Историко-культурные памятники Казахстана / Авт. предисл. и сост. Елеуов М., Бахтыбаев М.М. Туркестан: Туран, 2011. С. 223-227. 24. Маргулан А.Х. Некоторые итоги и перспективы археологического изучения Казахстана // Известия АН Каз ССР. Сер. археол. 1948. Вып. 1. № 46. С. 4-9. 25. Методы археологического исследования: Учеб. пособие / А.И. Мартынов, Я.А. Шер. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: «Высш. шк.», 2002. 240 с.: ил. 26. Нуржанов А. Средневековые города Чу-Таласского междуречья. (вопросы типологии, топографии). // Известия НАН РК. Сер. обществ. наук. 2011. № 3. С. 134-138. 27. Пантусов Н.Н. Город Алмалык и Мазар Туглук Тимур хана. // Кауфманский сборник, изданный в память 25 лет, истекших со дня смерти покорителя Туркестанского края, генерал-адъютанта К. П. фон-Кауфмана I-го. М.: Знание, 1910. С. 161-188. 28. Пацевич Г.И. Археологические памятники района среднего течения реки Чу // Архив ИА КН МОН РК, ф. 2, оп. 2, д. 64а. 29. Сала Р., Деом Ж.-М. Средневековые торткули Северного Тянь-Шаня и среднего течения Сырдарьи // Роль номадов евразийских степей в развитии мирового военного искусства. Научные чтения памяти Н.Э. Масанова. Алматы: LEM, 2010. С.263-286. 30. Сенигова Т.Н. Средневековый Тараз. Алма-Ата: Наука, 1972. 219 с. 31. Ходжиков К. Древнейшие памятники Семиречья // Труды Казахского инстиута национальной культуры. Алма-Ата: Казахское краевое издательство, 1935. Т. 1. 160 с.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

SMITH, SARAH M., ROGER A. BEAVER, WISUT SITTICHAYA, and ANTHONY I. COGNATO. "One hundred eighteen taxonomic changes among Xyleborine ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)." Zootaxa 5194, no. 2 (October 5, 2022): 151–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.2.1.

Full text
Abstract:
An ongoing study of the ambrosia beetle tribe Xyleborini has resulted in numerous taxonomic changes mostly representing new generic/species combinations which remove species from the once all-encompassing Xyleborus Eichhoff, 1864 to other genera based on revised taxonomic concepts. These changes are here listed. Terminalinus Hopkins, 1915 is removed from synonymy with Cyclorhipidion Hagedorn, 1912 and reinstated as a valid genus. Five species are removed from synonymy and reinstated as valid species: Amasa brevipennis (Schedl, 1971), Amasa fulgens (Schedl, 1975), Ambrosiophilus immitatrix (Schedl, 1975), Ambrosiophilus semirufus (Schedl, 1959), Microperus leprosulus (Schedl, 1936). The following 97 new or restored combinations are proposed: Ambrosiophilus bispinosulus (Schedl, 1961) comb. nov., Ambrosiophilus compressus (Lea, 1894) comb. nov., Ambrosiophilus latecompressus (Schedl, 1936) comb. nov., Ambrosiophilus pertortuosus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., Ambrosiophilus tomicoides (Eggers, 1923) comb. nov., Ambrosiophilus tortuosus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., Euwallacea obliquecauda (Motschulsky, 1863) comb. nov., all from Ambrosiodmus Hopkins, 1915; Coptodryas decepta (Schedl, 1979) comb. nov., Microperus pusillus (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., both from Arixyleborus Hopkins, 1915; Coptodryas pseudopunctula (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., from Cnestus Sampson, 1911; Microperus abbreviatus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., Microperus amphicauda (Browne, 1986) comb. nov., Microperus borneensis (Browne, 1986) comb. nov., Microperus comptus (Sampson, 1919) comb. nov., Microperus gorontalosus (Schedl, 1939) comb. nov., Microperus pullus (Schedl, 1952) comb. nov., Microperus tenellus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov., Microperus vafer Schedl, 1957 comb. nov., all from Coptodryas Hopkins, 1915; Ambrosiophilus pityogenes (Schedl, 1936) comb. nov., Arixyleborus scapularis (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., Beaverium dihingicum (Wood, 1992) comb. nov., Beaverium rufonitidus (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov., Coptodryas brevior (Eggers) comb. nov., Terminalinus dipterocarpi Hopkins, 1915 comb. res., Terminalinus sexspinatus (Schedl, 1935) comb. nov., Terminalinus terminaliae (Hopkins, 1915) comb. res., Truncaudum leverensis (Browne, 1986) comb. nov., all from Cyclorhipidion Hagedorn, 1912; Planiculus kororensis (Wood, 1960) comb. nov., Planiculus loricatus (Schedl, 1933) comb. nov., Planiculus murudensis (Browne, 1965) comb. nov., all from Euwallacea Reitter, 1915; Terminalinus anisopterae (Browne, 1983) comb. nov., Terminalinus indigens (Schedl, 1955) comb. nov., Terminalinus macropterus (Schedl, 1935) comb. nov., Terminalinus major (Stebbing, 1909) comb. nov., Terminalinus pilifer (Eggers, 1923) comb. nov., Terminalinus posticepilosus (Schedl, 1951) comb. res., Terminalinus pseudopilifer (Schedl, 1936) comb. nov., Terminalinus sulcinoides (Schedl, 1974) comb. nov., all from Fortiborus Hulcr & Cognato, 2010; Microperus micrographus (Schedl, 1958) comb. nov., Microperus truncatipennis (Schedl, 1961) comb. nov., both from Xyleborinus Reitter, 1913; Ambrosiophilus immitatrix (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov., Ambrosiophilus semirufus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov., Arixyleborus crenulatus (Eggers, 1920) comb. nov., Arixyleborus strombosiopsis (Schedl, 1957) comb. nov., Beaverium batoensis (Eggers, 1923) comb. nov., Beaverium calvus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., Beaverium obstipus (Schedl, 1935) comb. nov., Beaverium rufus (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov., Coptodryas cuneola (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion amanicum (Hagedorn, 1910) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion impar (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion inaequale (Schedl, 1934) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion kajangensis (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion obiensis (Browne, 1980) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion obtusatum (Schedl, 1972) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion perpunctatum (Schedl, 1971) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion repositum (Schedl) comb. nov., Cyclorhipidion separandum (Schedl, 1971) comb. nov., Debus abscissus (Browne, 1974) comb. nov., Debus amplexicauda (Hagedorn, 1910) comb. nov., Debus armillatus (Schedl, 1933) comb. nov., Debus balbalanus (Eggers 1927) comb. nov., Debus blandus (Schedl, 1954) comb. nov., Debus cavatus (Browne, 1980) comb. nov., Debus cylindromorphus (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., Debus dentatus (Blandford, 1895) comb. nov., Debus excavus (Schedl, 1964) comb. nov., Debus fischeri (Hagedorn, 1908) comb. nov., Debus hatanakai (Browne, 1983) comb. nov., Debus insitivus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov., Debus persimilis (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., Debus subdentatus (Browne, 1974) comb. nov., Debus trispinatus (Browne, 1981) comb. nov., Diuncus taxicornis (Schedl, 1971) comb. nov., Euwallacea agathis (Browne, 1984) comb. nov., Euwallacea assimilis (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., Euwallacea bryanti (Sampson, 1919) comb. nov., Euwallacea latecarinatus (Schedl, 1936) comb. nov., Euwallacea pseudorudis (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov., Euwallacea semipolitus (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov., Euwallacea temetiuicus (Beeson, 1935) comb. nov., Immanus duploarmatus (Browne, 1962) comb. nov., Leptoxyleborus sublinearis (Eggers, 1940) comb. nov., Peridryocoetes pinguis (Browne, 1983) (Dryocoetini) comb. nov., Stictodex halli (Schedl, 1954) comb. nov., Stictodex rimulosus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov., Terminalinus granurum (Browne, 1980) comb. nov., Terminalinus indonesianus (Browne, 1984) comb. nov., Terminalinus moluccanus (Browne, 1985) comb. nov., Terminalinus pseudomajor (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov., Terminalinus sublongus (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., Terminalinus takeharai (Browne) comb. nov., Terminalinus xanthophyllus (Schedl, 1942) comb. res., Tricosa abberrans (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov., Xenoxylebora truncatula (Schedl, 1957) comb. nov., Xyleborinus figuratus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov., Xylosandrus cancellatus (Eggers, 1936) comb. nov., all from Xyleborus. Fifteen new synonyms are proposed: Anisandrus ursulus (Eggers, 1923)(= Xyleborus lativentris Schedl, 1942 syn. nov.); Cyclorhipidion amanicus (Hagedorn, 1910)(= Xyleborus jongaensis Schedl, 1941 syn. nov.); Cyclorhipidion bodoanum (Reitter, 1913) (= Xyleborus takinoyensis Murayama, 1953 syn. nov.); Cyclorhipidion pelliculosum (Eichhoff, 1878) (= Xyleborus okinosenensis Murayama, 1961 syn. nov.); Cyclorhipidion repositum (Schedl, 1942) (= Xyleborus pruinosulus Browne, 1979 syn. nov.); Debus persimilis (Eggers, 1927) (= Xyleborus subdolosus Schedl, 1942c syn. nov.); Debus robustipennis (Schedl, 1954) (= Xyleborus interponens Schedl, 1954 syn. nov.); Euwallacea destruens (Blandford, 1896) (= Xyleborus procerior Schedl, 1942 syn. nov.); Euwallacea nigrosetosus (Schedl, 1939) (= Xyleborus nigripennis Schedl, 1951 syn. nov.); Euwallacea siporanus (Hagedorn, 1910) (= Xyleborus perakensis Schedl, 1942 syn. nov.); Microperus quercicola (Eggers, 1926) (= Xyleborus semistriatus Schedl, 1971 syn. nov.); Stictodex dimidiatus (Eggers, 1927) (= Xyleborus spicatus Browne, 1986 syn. nov.); Stictodex halli (Schedl, 1954) (= Xyleborus cuspidus Schedl, 1975 syn. nov.); Terminalinus Hopkins, 1915 (= Fortiborus Hulcr & Cognato 2010 syn. nov.); Terminalinus moluccanus (Browne, 1985) (= Xyleborus teminabani Browne, 1986 syn. nov.).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

JÄGER, PETER. "The spider genus Olios Walckenaer, 1837 (Araneae: Sparassidae)—Part 1: species groups, diagnoses, identification keys, distribution maps and revision of the argelasius-, coenobitus- and auricomis-groups." Zootaxa 4866, no. 1 (October 22, 2020): 1–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4866.1.1.

Full text
Abstract:
The genus Olios Walckenaer, 1837 is revised, a generic diagnosis is given and an identification key to eight species groups is provided. Olios in its revised sense includes 87 species and is distributed in Africa, southern Europe and Asia. Three species groups are revised in this first part, an identification key to species for each group is provided, five new species are described and all included species are illustrated. The Olios argelasius-group includes O. argelasius Walckenaer, 1806, O. canariensis (Lucas, 1838), O. pictus (Simon, 1885), O. fasciculatus Simon, 1880 and O. kunzi spec. nov. (male, female; Namibia, Zambia, South Africa); it is distributed in the Mediterranean region, northern Africa including Canary Islands, in the Middle East, South Sudan, East Africa, and southern Africa. The Olios coenobitus-group includes O. angolensis spec. nov. (male; Angola), O. coenobitus Fage, 1926, O. denticulus spec. nov. (male; Java), O. erraticus Fage, 1926, O. gambiensis spec. nov. (male, female; Gambia), O. milleti (Pocock, 1901b), O. mordax (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899) and O. pusillus Simon, 1880; it is distributed in Africa (Gambia, Angola, Tanzania, Madagascar) and Asia (India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia: Java). The Olios auricomis-group includes only O. auricomis (Simon, 1880), distributed in Africa south of 10°N. Other species groups are introduced briefly and will be revised in forthcoming revisions. The Olios correvoni-group includes currently O. claviger (Pocock, 1901a), O. correvoni Lessert, 1921, O. correvoni choupangensis Lessert, 1936, O. darlingi (Pocock, 1901a), O. faesi Lessert, 1933, O. freyi Lessert, 1929, O. kassenjicola Strand, 1916b, O. kruegeri (Simon, 1897a), O. quadrispilotus (Simon, 1880) comb. nov., O. lucieni comb. nov. nom. nov., O. sjostedti Lessert, 1921 and O. triarmatus Lessert, 1936; it is distributed in Africa (Zimbabwe, Tanzania incl. Zanzibar, Angola, Congo, Central Africa, South Africa, Botswana; O. darlingi was recorded from Zimbabwe and Botswana and not from South Africa). The Olios rossettii-group includes: O. baulnyi (Simon, 1874), O. bhattacharjeei (Saha & Raychaudhuri, 2007), O. brachycephalus Lawrence, 1938, O. floweri Lessert, 1921, O. jaldaparaensis Saha & Raychaudhuri, 2007, O. japonicus Jäger & Ono, 2000, O. kolosvaryi (Caporiacco, 1947b) comb. nov., O. longipes (Simon, 1884b), O. lutescens (Thorell, 1894), O. mahabangkawitus Barrion & Litsinger, 1995, O. obesulus (Pocock, 1901b), O. rossettii (Leardi, 1901), O. rotundiceps (Pocock, 1901b), O. sericeus (Kroneberg, 1875), O. sherwoodi Lessert, 1929, O. suavis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876), O. tarandus (Simon, 1897d), O. tener (Thorell, 1891) and O. tiantongensis (Zhang & Kim, 1996); it is distributed in the Mediterranean region, in Africa (especially eastern half) and Asia (Middle East and Central Asia to Japan, Philippines and Java). The Olios nentwigi-group includes O. diao Jäger, 2012, O. digitatus Sun, Li & Zhang, 2011, O. jaenicke Jäger, 2012, O. muang Jäger, 2012, O. nanningensis (Hu & Ru, 1988), O. nentwigi spec. nov. (male, female; Indonesia: Krakatau), O. perezi Barrion & Litsinger, 1995, O. scalptor Jäger & Ono, 2001 and O. suung Jäger, 2012; it is distributed in Asia (Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines), Papua New Guinea and Mariana Islands. Olios diao is newly recorded from Cambodia and Champasak Province in Laos. The Olios stimulator-group includes O. admiratus (Pocock, 1901b), O. hampsoni (Pocock, 1901b), O. lamarcki (Latreille, 1806) and O. stimulator Simon, 1897c; it is distributed in Africa (Madagascar, Seychelles), Middle East and South Asia (United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka). The Olios hirtus-group includes O. bungarensis Strand, 1913b, O. debalae (Biswas & Roy, 2005), O. ferox (Thorell, 1892), O. hirtus (Karsch, 1879a), O. igraya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. menghaiensis (Wang & Zhang, 1990), O. nigrifrons (Simon, 1897b), O. punctipes Simon, 1884a, O. punctipes sordidatus (Thorell, 1895), O. pyrozonis (Pocock, 1901b), O. sungaya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. taprobanicus Strand, 1913b and O. tikaderi Kundu et al., 1999; it is distributed in South, East and Southeast Asia (Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Myanmar, China, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines). Nineteen synonyms are recognised: Nisueta Simon, 1880, Nonianus Simon, 1885, both = Olios syn. nov.; O. spenceri Pocock, 1896, O. werneri (Simon, 1906a), O. albertius Strand, 1913a, O. banananus Strand, 1916a, O. aristophanei Lessert, 1936, all = O. fasciculatus; O. subpusillus Strand, 1907c = O. pusillus; O. schonlandi (Pocock, 1900b), O. rufilatus Pocock, 1900c, O. chiracanthiformis Strand, 1906, O. ituricus Strand, 1913a, O. isongonis Strand, 1915, O. flavescens Caporiacco, 1941 comb. nov., O. pacifer Lessert, 1921, all = O. auricomis; Olios sanguinifrons (Simon, 1906b) = O. rossettii Leardi, 1901; O. phipsoni (Pocock, 1899), Sparassus iranii (Pocock, 1901b), both = O. stimulator; O. fuligineus (Pocock, 1901b) = O. hampsoni. Nine species are transferred to Olios: O. gaujoni (Simon, 1897b) comb. nov., O. pictus comb. nov., O. unilateralis (Strand, 1908b) comb. nov. (all three from Nonianus), O. affinis (Strand, 1906) comb. nov., O. flavescens Caporiacco, 1941 comb. nov., O. quadrispilotus comb. nov., O. similis (Berland, 1922) comb. nov. (all four from Nisueta), O. sungaya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. igraya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov. (both from Isopeda L. Koch 1875). Olios lucieni nom. nov. comb. nov. is proposed for Nisueta similis Berland, 1922, which becomes a secondary homonym. The male of O. quadrispilotus comb. nov. is described for the first time. Sixteen species are currently without affiliation to one of the eight species groups: O. acolastus (Thorell, 1890), O. alluaudi Simon, 1887a, O. batesi (Pocock, 1900c), O. bhavnagarensis Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. croseiceps (Pocock, 1898b), O. durlaviae Biswas & Raychaudhuri, 2005, O. gentilis (Karsch, 1879b), O. gravelyi Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. greeni (Pocock, 1901b), O. inaequipes (Simon 1890), O. punjabensis Dyal, 1935, O. ruwenzoricus Strand, 1913a, O. senilis Simon, 1880, O. somalicus Caporiacco, 1940, O. wroughtoni (Simon, 1897c) and O. zulu Simon, 1880. Five of these species are illustrated in order to allow identification of the opposite (male) sex and to settle their systematic placement. Thirty-seven species are considered nomina dubia, mostly because they were described from immatures, three of them are illustrated: O. abnormis (Blackwall, 1866), O. affinis (Strand, 1906) comb. nov., O. africanus (Karsch, 1878), O. amanensis Strand, 1907a, O. annandalei (Simon, 1901), O. bivittatus Roewer, 1951, O. ceylonicus (Leardi, 1902), O. conspersipes (Thorell, 1899), Palystes derasus (C.L. Koch, 1845) comb. nov., O. detritus (C.L. Koch, 1845), O. digitalis Eydoux & Souleyet, 1842, O. exterritorialis Strand, 1907b, O. flavovittatus (Caporiacco, 1935), O. fugax (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885), O. guineibius Strand, 1911c, O. guttipes (Simon, 1897a), O. kiranae Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. longespinus Caporiacco, 1947b, O. maculinotatus Strand, 1909, O. morbillosus (MacLeay, 1827), O. occidentalis (Karsch, 1879b), O. ornatus (Thorell, 1877), O. pagurus Walckenaer, 1837, O. patagiatus (Simon, 1897b), O. praecinctus (L. Koch, 1865), O. provocator Walckenaer, 1837, O. quesitio Moradmand, 2013, O. quinquelineatus Taczanowski, 1872, O. sexpunctatus Caporiacco, 1947a, Heteropoda similaris (Rainbow, 1898) comb. rev., O. socotranus (Pocock, 1903), O. striatus (Blackwall, 1867), O. timidus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885), Remmius variatus (Thorell, 1899) comb. nov., O. vittifemur Strand, 1916b, O. wolfi Strand, 1911a and O. zebra (Thorell, 1881). Eighty-nine species are misplaced in Olios but cannot be affiliated to any of the known genera. They belong to the subfamilies Deleninae Hogg, 1903, Sparassinae Bertkau, 1872 and Palystinae Simon, 1897a, nineteen of them are illustrated: O. acostae Schenkel, 1953, O. actaeon (Pocock, 1898c), O. artemis Hogg, 1915, O. atomarius Simon, 1880, O. attractus Petrunkevitch, 1911, O. auranticus Mello-Leitão, 1918, O. benitensis (Pocock, 1900c), O. berlandi Roewer, 1951, O. biarmatus Lessert, 1925, O. canalae Berland, 1924, O. caprinus Mello-Leitão, 1918, O. chelifer Lawrence, 1937, O. chubbi Lessert, 1923, O. clarus (Keyserling, 1880), O. coccineiventris (Simon, 1880), O. corallinus Schmidt, 1971, O. crassus Banks, 1909, O. debilipes Mello-Leitão, 1945, O. discolorichelis Caporiacco, 1947a, O. erroneus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890, O. extensus Berland, 1924, O. fasciiventris Simon, 1880 , O. feldmanni Strand, 1915, O. fimbriatus Chrysanthus, 1965, O. flavens Nicolet, 1849, O. fonticola (Pocock, 1902), O. formosus Banks, 1929, O. francoisi (Simon, 1898a), O. fulvithorax Berland, 1924, O. galapagoensis Banks, 1902, O. gaujoni (Simon, 1897b) comb. nov., O. giganteus Keyserling, 1884, O. hoplites Caporiacco, 1941, O. humboldtianus Berland, 1924, O. insignifer Chrysanthus, 1965, O. insulanus (Thorell, 1881), O. keyserlingi (Simon, 1880), O. lacticolor Lawrence, 1952, O. lepidus Vellard, 1924, O. longipedatus Roewer, 1951, O. machadoi Lawrence, 1952, O. macroepigynus Soares, 1944, O. maculatus Blackwall, 1862, O. marshalli (Pocock, 1898a), O. mathani (Simon, 1880), O. minensis Mello-Leitão, 1917, O. monticola Berland, 1924, O. mutabilis Mello-Leitão, 1917, O. mygalinus Doleschall, 1857, O. mygalinus cinctipes Merian, 1911, O. mygalinus nirgripalpis Merian, 1911, O. neocaledonicus Berland, 1924, O. nigristernis (Simon, 1880), O. nigriventris Taczanowski, 1872, O. oberzelleri Kritscher, 1966, O. obscurus (Keyserling, 1880), O. obtusus F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900, O. orchiticus Mello-Leitão, 1930, O. oubatchensis Berland, 1924, O. paraensis (Keyserling, 1880), O. pellucidus (Keyserling, 1880), O. peruvianus Roewer, 1951, O. pictitarsis Simon, 1880, O. plumipes Mello-Leitão, 1937, O. princeps Hogg, 1914, O. pulchripes (Thorell, 1899), O. puniceus (Simon, 1880), O. roeweri Caporiacco, 1955a, O. rubripes Taczanowski, 1872, O. rubriventris (Thorell, 1881), O. rufus Keyserling, 1880, O. sanctivincenti (Simon, 1898b), O. similis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890), O. simoni (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890), O. skwarrae Roewer, 1933, O. spinipalpis (Pocock, 1901a), O. stictopus (Pocock, 1898a), O. strandi Kolosváry, 1934, O. subadultus Mello-Leitão, 1930, O. sulphuratus (Thorell, 1899), O. sylvaticus (Blackwall, 1862), O. tamerlani Roewer, 1951, O. tigrinus (Keyserling, 1880), O. trifurcatus (Pocock, 1900c), O. trinitatis Strand, 1916a, O. velox (Simon, 1880), O. ventrosus Nicolet, 1849, O. vitiosus Vellard, 1924 and O. yucatanus Chamberlin, 1925. Seventeen taxa are transferred from Olios to other genera within Sparassidae, eight of them are illustrated: Adcatomus luteus (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Eusparassus flavidus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885) comb. nov., Palystes derasus (C.L. Koch, 1845) comb. nov., Heteropoda similaris (Rainbow, 1898) comb. rev., Remmius variatus (Thorell, 1899) comb. nov., Nolavia audax (Banks, 1909) comb. nov., Nolavia antiguensis (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Nolavia antiguensis columbiensis (Schmidt, 1971) comb. nov., Nolavia fuhrmanni (Strand, 1914) comb. nov., Nolavia helva (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Nolavia stylifer (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900) comb. nov., Nolavia valenciae (Strand, 1916a) comb. nov., Nungara cayana (Taczanowski, 1872) comb. nov., Polybetes bombilius (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899) comb. nov., Polybetes fasciatus (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Polybetes hyeroglyphicus (Mello-Leitão, 1918) comb. nov. and Prychia paalonga (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov. One species is transferred from Olios to the family Clubionidae Wagner, 1887: Clubiona paenuliformis (Strand, 1916a) comb. nov.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography