Journal articles on the topic '1881-1943'

Este artículo plantea, a partir del estudio de fuentes disponibles, una reconstrucción de los intentos y formas de catalogación que se dieron en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú antes del incendio de 1943 y antes de la gestión como director de Jorge Basadre (1943-1945). Se estudiaran por tanto los periodos conocidos como el de la Primera Biblioteca Nacional (1821-1881) y la Segunda Biblioteca Nacional (1883-1943).

Otto Albrecht. 1881 - 1943. Ein Malerschicksal in Hohenlohe. Hg. vom Arbeitskreis Otto Albrecht im Museums- und Kulturverein Kirchberg an der Jagst e.V. Mit Beiträgen von Harald Zigan, Ute Schenk und Wolfram Zoller. Crailsheim (Baier) 2010. 149 S., ca. 110 Abb.

The purpose of this study is to clarify the identity of the type species of the lycaenine genus Phoenicurusia Verity, 1943 so that the name can be used correctly in future taxonomic work. Phoenicurusia was originally typified by Polyommatus phoenicurus Lederer, 1870 which is currently treated as a member of the genus Athamanthia Zhdanko, 1983 (Bozano & Weidenhoffer 2001). However, the specimen examined and illustrated by Verity (1943) to diagnose the genus was an individual of Polyommatus phoenicurus var. margelanica Staudinger, 1881 currently treated as a distinct species. Consequently, Verity’s original typification was based on a misidentification. In order to make Phoenicurusia available, and taking in consideration differences in the male genitalia structure supporting distinct genera Phoenicurusia and Athamanthia, its type species is fixed under Article 70.3.2 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (1999) as Polyommatus phoenicurus var. margelanica.

This paper, dedicated to search for identification methods of genera of Salticidae (Araneae), presents prototype of a “Handbook of Jumping Spiders Identification”, based on morphology of palps, spermathecae and ducts, as well as some other easily noticeable characters. It includes diagnostic drawings of representative species of each genus, additional survey of diversity of these characters in 4800 recognizable species is available instantly, by hyperlinks provided to parallel Internet "Monograph of the Salticidae (Araneae) of the World 1995-2016".Part I "Introduction to alternative classification of Salticidae" by Prószyński (2016a), accessible at: http://www.peckhamia.com/salticidae/Subfamilies/ [too large to be published whole as a PDF]. The work contains methodological suggestions on how the proposed system could be improved and further developed. Partial revision of the present taxonomic system of Salticidae is included.The paper provides diagnoses and diagnostic drawings to genera of Salticidae, grouped to facilitate identification into morphologically coherent, informal groups of genera. There are following provisional groups proposed: AEURILLINES, AMYCINES, AMYCOIDA VARIA, ASTIAINES, BELIPPINES, CHRYSILLINES, COCALODINES, COLONINES [= former Thiodininae], DENDRYPHANTINES, DIOLENINES, EUODENINES, EUOPHRYINES, EUPOAINES, EVARCHINES, HABRONATTINES, HARMOCHIRINES, HELIOPHANINES, HISPONINES, HYLLINES, ICIINES, LAPSIINES, LIGONIPEINES, LYSSOMANINES, MENEMERINES, MYRMARACHNINES, NOTICIINES, PELLENINES, PSEUDICIINES, SIMAETHINES, SITTICINES, SPARTAEINES, THIRATOSCIRTINAE, YAGINUMAELLINES, YLLENINES. There is also temporary UNCLASSIFIED group and display of exemplary FOSSILS. The proposals of grouping and delimitation have working character, pending further research and tests.The following synonyms and combinations (new, corrected or reinstated) are listed in the paper together with their documentation and/or discussions. They have been accumulated during 22 years of work on database, but are printed for the first time only now (location of their documentation in the text below can be quickly found using computer searching facility).Aelurillus stanislawi (Prószyński, 1999) (male from Israel) = Rafalus stanislawi Prószyński, 1999, Aelurillus stanislawi Azarkina, (2006) (nec Prószyński, 1999) = Aelurillus minutus Azarkina, 2002, Amphidraus manni (Bryant 1943) = Nebridia manni Bryant 1943, Amphidraus mendica (Bryant 1943) = Nebridia mendica Bryant 1943, Amphidraus semicanus (Simon, 1902) = Nebridia semicana Simon, 1902, Bianor incitatus Thorell, 1890 (in part) = Stichius albomaculatus Thorell, 1890, Bryantella smaragdus (Crane, 1945) = Bryantella smaragda (Crane, 1945), Chinattus undulatus (Song & Chai, 1992) (in part, male) = Chinattus szechwanensis (Prószyński, 1992), Colyttus kerinci (Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) = Donoessus kerinci Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012, Colyttus nigriceps (Simon, 1899) = Donoessus nigriceps (Simon, 1899), Colyttus striatus (Simon, 1902) = Donoessus striatus (Simon, 1902), Cytaea severa (Thorell, 1881) (in part) = Cytaea alburna Keyserling, 1882, Euophrys minuta Prószynski, 1992 ) = Lechia minuta (Prószynski, 1992 ), Laufeia daiqini (Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) = Junxattus daiqini Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012, Laufeia kuloni (Prószynski & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) = Orcevia kuloni Prószynski & Deeleman-Reinhold 2012, Laufeia keyserlingi (Thorell, 1890) = Orcevia keyserlingi (Thorell, 1890), Laufeia eucola (Thorell, 1890) = Orcevia eucola (Thorell, 1890), Laufeia perakensis (Simon, 1901) = Orcevia perakensis (Simon, 1901), Laufeia proszynskii Song, Gu & Chen, 1988 = Orcevia proszynskii (Song, Gu & Chen, 1988), Laufeia squamata ( Żabka, 1985 ) = Lechia squamata Żabka, 1985, Maevia C. L. Koch, 1846 (in part) = Paramaevia Barnes, 1955, Maevia hobbsae Barnes, 1958 = Paramaevia hobbsae Barnes, 1958, Maevia michelsoni Barnes, 1958 = Paramaevia michelsoni (Barnes, 1958), Maevia poultoni Peckham & Peckham, 1909 = Paramaevia poultoni (Peckham & Peckham, 1901),Maratus anomaliformis (Żabka, 1987) = "Lycidas" anomaliformis Żabka, 1987, Metaphidippus felix (Peckham & Peckham, 1901) = Messua felix (Peckham & Peckham, 1901), Monomotapa principalis Wesolowska, 2000 = Iranattus principalis (Wesolowska, 2000), Myrmarachne exasperans (Peckham & Peckham, 1892) = Emertonius exasperans Peckham & Peckham, 1892, Myrmarachne melanocephala MacLeay, 1839 (in part) = Myrmarachne ramosa Badcock, 1918, Myrmarachne melanocephala MacLeay, 1839 (in part) = Myrmarachne contracta (Karsch, 1880), Myrmarachne melanocephala MacLeay, 1839 (in part) = Myrmarachne albicrurata Badcock, 1918, Myrmarachne melanocephala MacLeay, 1839 (in part) = Myrmarachne lateralis Badcock, 1918, Myrmarachne melanocephala MacLeay, 1839 (in part) = Myrmarachne providens Simon, 1901, Myrmavola globosa (Wanless, 1978) = Toxeus globosus (Wanless, 1978) (self-correction), Omoedus albertisi (Thorell, 1881) = Zenodorus albertisi (Thorell, 1881), Omoedus arcipluvii (Peckham, Peckham, 1901) = Zenodorus arcipluvii (Peckham, Peckham, 1901), Omoedus asper (Karsch, 1878) = Ascyltus asper (Karsch, 1878), Omoedus bernsteini (Thorell, 1881) = Zenodorus bernsteini (Thorell, 1881), - Omoedus brevis Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 = Zenodorus brevis (Zhang J., Maddison, 2012), Omoedus cyanothorax (Thorell, 1881) = Pystira cyanothorax (Thorell, 1881), - Omoedus durvillei (Walckenaer, 1837) = Zenodorus durvillei (Walckenaer, 1837)- Omoedus danae (Hogg, 1915) = Zenodorus danae Hogg, 1915, - Omoedus darleyorum Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 = Zenodorus darleyorum (Zhang J., Maddison, 2012),Omoedus ephippigerus (Simon, 1885) = Pystira ephippigera (Simon, 1885), Omoedus karschi (Thorell, 1881) = Pystira karschi (Thorell, 1881), Omoedus lepidus (Guerin, 1834) = Zenodorus lepidus (Guerin, 1834), Omoedus metallescens (Koch L., 1879) = Zenodorus metallescens (Koch L., 1879), Omoedus meyeri Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 = Zenodorus meyeri (Zhang J., Maddison, 2012), Omoedus microphthalmus (Koch L., 1881) = Zenodorus microphthalmus (Koch L., 1881), Omoedus nigripalpis (Thorell, 1877) = Pystira nigripalpis (Thorell, 1877)]. Omoedus obscurofemoratus (Keyserling, 1883) = Zenodorus obscurofemoratus (Keyserling, 1883), Omoedus omundseni Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 = Zenodorus omundseni (Zhang J., Maddison, 2012), Omoedus orbiculatus (Keyserling, 1881) = Zenodorus orbiculatus (Keyserling, 1881), Omoedus papuanus Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 = Zenodorus papuanus (Zhang J., Maddison, 2012), Omoedus ponapensis (Berry, Beatty, Prószyński, 1996) = Zenodorus ponapensis Berry, Beatty, Prószynski, 1996, Omoedus semirasus (Keyserling, 1882) = Zenodorus semirasus (Keyserling, 1882), Omoedus swiftorum Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 = Zenodorus swiftorum (Zhang J., Maddison, 2012), Omoedus tortuosus Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 = Zenodorus tortuosus (Zhang J., Maddison, 2012), Omoedus versicolor (Dyal, 1935) = Pystira versicolor Dyal, 1935, [Unrecognizable species of Zenodorus: Omoedus jucundus (Rainbow, 1912) = Zenodorus jucundus (Rainbow, 1912), Omoedus juliae (Thorell, 1881) = Zenodorus juliae (Thorell, 1881), Omoedus marginatus (Simon, 1902) = Zenodorus marginatus (Simon, 1902), Omoedus niger (Karsch, 1878) = Zenodorus niger (Karsch, 1878), - Omoedus pupulus (Thorell, 1881) = Zenodorus pupulus (Thorell, 1881), - Omoedus pusillus (Strand, 1913) = Zenodorus pusillus (Strand, 1913), Omoedus rhodopae (Hogg, 1915) = Zenodorus rhodopae (Hogg, 1915), Omoedus syrinx (Hogg, 1915) = Zenodorus syrinx Hogg, 1915, Omoedus variatus (Pocock, 1899) = Zenodorus variatus (Pocock, 1899), Omoedus varicans (Thorell, 1881) = Zenodorus varicans Thorell, 1881, Omoedus wangillus (Strand, 1911) = Zenodorus wangillus Strand, 1911], Pellenes ostrinus (Simon, 1884) (in part) = Pellenes diagonalis Simon, 1868, Pseudicius alter Wesolowska, 1999 = Afraflacilla altera (Wesolowska, 1999), Pseudicius arabicus (Wesolowska, van Harten, 1994) = Afraflacilla arabica Wesolowska, van Harten, 1994, Pseudicius bipunctatus Peckham, Peckham, 1903 = Afraflacilla bipunctata (Peckham, Peckham, 1903), Pseudicius braunsi Peckham, Peckham, 1903 = Afraflacilla braunsi (Peckham, Peckham, 1903), Pseudicius datuntatus Logunov, Zamanpoore, 2005= Afraflacilla datuntata (Logunov, Zamanpoore, 2005), Pseudicius elegans (Wesolowska, Cumming, 2008) = Afraflacilla elegans (Wesolowska, Cumming, 2008), Pseudicius eximius Wesolowska, Russel-Smith, 2000 = Afraflacilla eximia (Wesolowska, Russel-Smith, 2000), Pseudicius fayda Wesolowska, van Harten, 2010 = Afraflacilla fayda (Wesolowska, van Harten, 2010), Pseudicius flavipes Caporiacco, 1935 = Afraflacilla flavipes (Caporiacco, 1935), Pseudicius histrionicus Simon, 1902 = Afraflacilla histrionica (Simon, 1902), Pseudicius imitator Wesolowska, Haddad, 2013 = Afraflacilla imitator (Wesolowska, Haddad, 2013), Pseudicius javanicus Prószynski, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 = Afraflacilla javanica (Prószynski, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012), Pseudicius karinae (Haddad, Wesolowska, 2011) = Afraflacilla karinae (Haddad, Wesolowska, 2011), Pseudicius kraussi Marples, 1964 = Afraflacilla kraussi (Marples, 1964), Pseudicius mikhailovi Prószynski, 1999 = Afraflacilla mikhailovi (Prószynski, 1999), Pseudicius mushrif Wesolowska, van Harten, 2010 = Afraflacilla mushrif (Wesolowska, van Harten, 2010), Pseudicius philippinensis Prószynski, 1992 = Afraflacilla philippinensis (Prószynski, 1992), Pseudicius punctatus Marples, 1957 = Afraflacilla punctata (Marples, 1957), Pseudicius refulgens Wesolowska, Cumming, 2008 = Afraflacilla refulgens (Wesolowska, Cumming, 2008), Pseudicius reiskindi Prószynski, 1992 = Afraflacilla reiskindi (Prószynski, 1992), Pseudicius roberti Wesolowska, 2011 = Afraflacilla roberti (Wesolowska, 2011), Pseudicius spiniger (Pickard-Cambridge O., 1872) = Afraflacilla spiniger (Pickard-Cambridge O., 1872), Pseudicius tamaricis Simon, 1885 = Afraflacilla tamaricis (Simon, 1885), Pseudicius tripunctatus Prószynski, 1989 = Afraflacilla tripunctata (Prószynski, 1989), Pseudicius venustulus Wesolowska, Haddad, 2009 = Afraflacilla venustula (Wesolowska, Haddad, 2009), Pseudicius wadis Prószynski, 1989 = Afraflacilla wadis (Prószynski, 1989), Pseudicius zuluensis Haddad, Wesolowska, 2013 = Afraflacilla zuluensis (Haddad, Wesolowska, 2013), Servaea incana (Karsch, 1878) (in part) = Servaea vestita ( L. Koch, 1879), Sidusa extensa (Peckham & Peckham, 1896) = Cobanus extensus (Peckham & Peckham, 1896), Sidusa Peckham & Peckham, 1895 (in part) = Cobanus F. O. Pickard-Cambridge , 1900, Sidusa Peckham & Peckham, 1895 (in part) = Wallaba Mello-Leitão, 1940, Stagetillus elegans (Reimoser, 1927) = "Padillothorax" elegans Reimoser, 1927, Stagetillus taprobanicus (Simon, 1902) = "Padillothorax" taprobanicus Simon, 1902, Telamonia besanconi (Berland & Millot, 1941) = Brancus besanconi (Berland & Millot, 1941), Telamonia fuscimana (Simon, 1903) = Brancus fuscimanus (Simon, 1903), Telamonia longiuscula (Thorell, 1899) = Hyllus longiusculus (Thorell, 1899), Telamonia thoracica (Thorell, 1899) [="Viciria"thoracica: Prószyński, 1984 = Hyllus thoracicus (Thorell, 1899), - Thiania sundevalli (Thorell, 1890) = Nicylla sundevalli Thorell, 1890, Thiania spectrum (Simon, 1903) = Thianitara spectrum Simon, 1903, Thiania thailandica (Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) = Thianitara thailandica Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012, Viciria albocincta Thorell, 1899 = Hyllus albocinctus (Thorell, 1899), Yaginumaella striatipes (Grube, 1861) (in part) = Yaginumaella ususudi Yaginuma, 1972.

The genera Trichopetalum Harger, 1872, Zygonopus Ryder, 1881 and Scoterpes Cope, 1872 are revised. Illustrations are provided for all but one species, and distributions are mapped. The first known authentic chordeumatidan spermatophores are described for Trichopetalum dux (Chamberlin), 1940. The production of a sticky secretion from the bases of the segmental setae, possibly defensive in function, is also described. The new subfamily Mexiterpetinae is established for the genus Mexiterpes Causey, 1963; the remaining genera of Trichopetalidae are grouped in subfamily Trichopetalinae Verhoeff, 1914 (tribe Scoterpetini Causey, 1969, n. syn.). Trichopetalum consists of seven species, all surface-dwelling or troglophilic: lunatum Harger, 1872, uncum Cook & Collins, 1895, dux (Chamberlin), 1940, montis Chamberlin, 1951, stannardi (Causey), 1951, dickbrucei n. sp. and jerryblatti n. sp. Zygonopus is resurrected from synonymy with Trichopetalum; it contains four troglobiotic species: whitei Ryder, 1881 (for which a neotype specimen is designated), krekeleri Causey, 1960, packardi Causey, 1960 and weyeriensis Causey, 1960. Scoterpes likewise is made up entirely of troglobiotic species, including copei (Packard), 1881, austrinus Loomis, 1943, nudus Chamberlin, 1946, ventus Shear, 1972, syntheticus (Shear), 1972, sollmani Lewis, 2000, and the following new species: alabama, hesperus, jackdanieli, musicarustica, stewartpecki, tombarri, tricorner and willreevesi. It is likely that at least S. copei and S. ventus are “superspecies,” consisting of numerous genetically isolated populations, which await study with molecular and/or morphometric methods.

Published and unpublished data on the epigeic and cave centipedes of Sardinia (Italy) are summarized and critically revised in this paper. Fifty-four species are listed and discussed (1 Scutigeromorpha, 19 Lithobiomorpha, 6 Scolopendromorpha, 28 Geophilomorpha), two of which new to the island: Lamyctes emarginatus (Newport, 1844) and Schendyla montana (Attems, 1895). Thirty-one species have been recorded in caves (1 Scutigeromorpha, 14 Lithobiomorpha, 6 Scolopendromorpha, 10 Geophilomorpha) – including the poorly known Plutonium zwierleini Cavanna, 1881 – six of which exclusive of this habitat (5 Lithobius spp., 1 Cryptops sp.). Five species are introduced or probably introduced. General geographic distribution, chorotype, Sardinian localities and ecological notes (altitudinal ranges, habitats) are given for each species. Taxonomic notes are given for some species. Lithobius turritanus Fanzago, 1881 and Lithobius molophai Restivo De Miranda, 1978, previously considered synonyms of Lithobius tricuspis Meinert, 1872 and Lithobius cerii Verhoeff, 1943, respectively, are recognized as valid species, status rev. The new synonymies Lithobius melanops domusnovae Restivo De Miranda, 1976 = Lithobius lapidicola Meinert, 1872 syn. nov., Lithobius oligoporus Latzel, 1884 = Lithobius turritanus Fanzago, 1881 syn. nov. and Lithobius fraleliae De Miranda Restivo, 1978 = Lithobius turritanus Fanzago, 1881 syn. nov. are proposed. Lithobius turritanei Restivo De Miranda i. l. in Cassola, 1982 is recognized as nomen nudum. Cryptops breviunguis A. Costa, 1882 is proposed as species inquirenda and its identity with Cryptops anomalans Newport, 1844 is rejected. Lithobius molophai Restivo De Miranda, 1978 and L. sardous Silvestri, 1898 are redescribed on type or topotypical material. A lectotype for L. sardous Silvestri, 1898 is also designated. Lithobius sardus Manfredi, 1956 status nov., formerly a subspecies of L. agilis C. L. Koch, 1847, is raised to species level; its probable affinity with L. turritanus Fanzago, 1881 is also discussed. Lithobius infossusSilvestri, 1894 (= L. dahlii Verhoeff, 1925) is erased from the centipede fauna of Sardinia, and previous records should be referred to an unidentified species of Lithobius or to L. nuragicus Zapparoli, 1997.

Julia Dickstein-Wieleżyńska (1881–1943) – historyczka literatury i filozofii, poetka, publicystka, działaczka społeczna i edukacyjna, a także tłumaczka literatury piękneji naukowej z wielu języków – jest postacią wciąż niedostatecznie docenioną w badaniach literackich. Niniejszy artykuł skupia się na działalności Dicksteinówny jako mediatorki transkulturowej i tłumaczki oraz na umiejscowieniu przekładu na tle jej rozlicznych zainteresowań i dokonań. Niepublikowana korespondencja tłumaczki z Raffaelem Pettazzonim (1883–1959), antropologiem i historykiem religii, pozwala na zobaczenie jej aktywności przekładowej w perspektywie osobistej i socjologicznej, poprzez pryzmat sprawczości i współpracy (translaboration; Alfer 2017) różnych agentów translatorskiego procesu. Ukazuje też ograniczenia, jakie napotykała intelektualistka w świecie literackim i naukowym pierwszej połowy XX wieku.

On 29 June 1909, a jury of six scholars decreed that Pierre Aubry (1874–1910), in his bookTrouvères et Troubadours, had stolen the ‘modal’ interpretation of medieval monophony from the young doctor Jean-Baptiste Beck (1881–1943). Aubry was to make amends for his plagiarism in two ways: first, by destroying copies of the book's first edition and issuing an emended one; second, by publishing the trial's verdict in twenty scholarly journals at his own cost. An only slightly emendedTrouvères et Troubadoursdid appear the following year (1910), but Aubry failed to publish the jury's verdict in a single journal. A little over a year after the trial, in August of 1910, he died of a fencing wound. The following year, Beck emigrated to the United States.

Ahmad Fadl al-‘Abdali (1881–1943) is a remarkable cultural figure of Southern Yemen. A close relative of the sovereigns of Sultanate of Lahdj, he displayed himself as a poet, a musician, a horticulturist, a general, a politician and, finally, a historian. While describing his native Lahdj and Aden, ruled by the British, in the historical work of Hadiyyat al-Zaman fi Akhbar muluk Lahdj wa ‘Adan al-‘Abdali revealed himself as a genuine adherent of the traditional Arabic school of history-writing, who nevertheless acquired some “alien” lessons and innovations. While telling the story of Ahmad Fadl al-‘Ablali and his work on history, the Author of the article puts his study into a broad historical framework, besides sharing with the reader his own impressions on the visit to Southern Yemen undertaken in 1982.

Roger (Ruggero) Verity published Phoenicurusia as a subgenus of Lycaena Fabricius, on p. 21 of vol. 2 of Farfalle Diurne d’Italia (1943), since in the male genitalia the falces were bent like an acute elbow after one-quarter of their length, rather than smoothly curved as they are in species of the subgenus Lycaena. Verity contextually designated Polyommatus phoenicurus Lederer, 1870 (Locus Typicus: [LT] ‘Hadschyabad’ [N. Iran]) as the Type Species [TS] of Phoenicurusia and described the male genitalia of phoenicurus Lederer, 1870, “razza” scintillans Christoph, 1887, labelled as from Germab (Askhabad [Turkmenistan]), and those of Polyommatus dimorphus Staudinger, 1881, labelled as from Passo Taldyk [Kyrgyzstan: Alai Mts]. Although Verity included both species in his new subgenus, he also highlighted an important difference existing between them, since, contrary to those of dimorphus, the genitalia of phoenicurus were ‘enormous’ with respect to the size of the butterfly. Both the aedeagus and the valvae were extremely elongate, much more than those of dimorphus and the latter were terminally toothed.

ABSTRACT During the Second World War, the central Mediterranean island of Malta was famously besieged by the Italian navy and intensively bombed by Italian and later German air forces, from June 1940 until Allied victory in North Africa in May 1943 brought an end to the siege. It was then scheduled as a staging post to support the Allied invasion of Sicily from North Africa in July 1943 and of mainland Italy from Sicily in September. From 1941 until 1945, two Tunnelling Companies Royal Engineers, overlapping in succession, excavated underground facilities safe from aerial or naval bombardment. In 1943 and then 1944–1945, two Boring Sections Royal Engineers in succession drilled wells to enhance water supplies, initially for increased troop concentrations. Borehole site selection was guided in 1943 by the Director of the Geological Survey of Great Britain (Edward Battersby Bailey: 1881–1965) and by geologists Captain Frederick William Shotton (1906–1990) and Major Gordon Lyall Paver (1913–1988). In 1944, it was guided by geologist Captain Howard Digby Roberts (1913–1971), leading a detachment from 42nd Geological Section of the South African Engineer Corps that pioneered earth resistivity surveys on the island. Overall, these military studies generated a new but unpublished geological map of the island at 1:31,680-scale and refined knowledge of its geological structure: a much faulted but otherwise near-horizontal Oligo-Miocene sedimentary sequence. Further refinement was achieved as a consequence of the 1944–1945 drilling programme, led principally by geologist Captain Thomas Owen Morris (1904–1989) of the Royal Engineers. By 1945, this had helped to develop an improved water supply system for the island, and plans to develop groundwater abstracted from a perched upper aquifer (in the Upper Coralline Limestone and underlying Greensand formations, above a ‘Blue Clay’) as well as from the main lower aquifer, near sea level (in the Globigerina Limestone and/or underlying Lower Coralline Limestone formations).

<p>Autor przedstawia i krótko omawia trzy dotychczas nieznane utwory muzyczne: pieśń <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Swaty </em>Tadeusza Markowskiego (1881-1969), pieśń <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Orzeł i Pogoń </em>autorstwa Juliana Krzewińskiego (1882-1943) oraz miniaturę fortepianową pod tytułem <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Lublinianka górą! Polka Mazurka </em>– kompozycję nieznanego J. Dreznera (koniec XIX wieku). Kompozycje te zachowały się w zbiorze nutowym pozostałym po Franciszku Jasińskim (1895-1972), organiście kościoła św. Michała Archanioła w Lublinie.</p>SUMMARY<p>The author present three previously unknown pieces: the songs <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Swaty </em> [Matchmaking] by Tadeusz Markowski (1881-1969) and <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Orzeł i Pogoń </em>[The Eagle and Pahonia (Vytis)] by Julian Krzewiński (1882-1943), as well as a piano miniature <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Lublinianka górą! </em> [Lublinianka is in the Lead] <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Polka Mazurka </em>by J. Drezner (the late nineteenth century). The piece for solo voice, accompanied by the piano, written by the now forgotten Tadeusz Markowski (the father of two well-known composers, Andrzej Markowski and Jan Markowski) allows us to broaden the knowledge of that musician’s achievements, who distinguished himself in Lublin’s musical culture. The song Orzeł i Pogoń by Julian Krzewiński, also for voice and piano, is an interesting historical document because it was dedicated to General Lucjan Żeligowski. The miniature by J. Drezner, in turn, is worth noting because it was composed by an unidentifi ed composer and has an intriguing dedication: “Presented to Fair Lublin Maidens [<em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Ofiarowana Nadobnym Lubliniankom</em>]”. The compositions were preserved in the score collection left by Franciszek Jasiński (1895-1972), the organist for many years at St. Michael the Archangel church in Lublin.</p>

Nesse texto, exploraremos a confluência de dois importantes filósofos franceses contemporâneos a respeito do problema da liberdade individual. Trata-se de Jean Nabert (1881-1960) e Paul Ricoeur (1913-2005), que serão lidos em seus textos de juventude: L’Expérience intérieure de la liberté (1924) e Éléments pour une Éthique (1943), no caso de Nabert ; Philosophie de la volonté 1: Le volontaire et l’involontaire (1950), no caso de Ricoeur. Nessas obras, ambos os filósofos nos legam a tarefa de recusar toda conceituação da vontade humana que a entenda como sendo constituída por fases, por momentos pontuais; em vez disso, eles a concebem em seu dinamismo próprio, seu ritmo de existência, no qual a decisão é apenas o ponto de chegada. É nesse ritmo de existência que o homem livre, ao constituir motivos para agir e criar valores para pautar suas ações, termina por criar a si mesmo.

A dendroecological study was carried out on 196 sites distributed throughout the whole natural range of silver fir (Abiesalba Miller) in the Vosges mountains of northeastern France. At each site, six dominant trees were bored to the pith. Stand age varied, intentionally, from 40 to 180 years. All tree rings were measured and crossdated; data were then standardized with reference to the mean curve ring width vs. cambial age. The growth indices obtained in this way were studied (setting aside the cambial age) and revealed a great increase in mean vigour from 1830 to 1930–1940 (+70%) and a slight decrease from 1930–1940 to the present (−10%). Using meteorological data from Strasbourg (monthly precipitation and temperature data available from 1881) and a stepwise multiple linear regression, a climatic model was created that explains 79% of the variance. This amount included not only the monthly parameters of years y (year of ring formation) and y − 1 in the model, but also the parameters of years y − 2 toy − 6. Thus, the notion of structural autocorrelation loses much of its credibility in comparison with the notion of climatic aftereffects. The statistical validation of the model distinguishes a calibration period (1881–1960) and a verification period (1961–1983). The model reconstructs the long-term trends satisfactorily, as well as periodic severe growth declines of silver fir in 1917–1923, 1943–1951, and 1976–1983. These phenomena are mainly explained by climatic factors. The possible aggravating role of air pollution is put forward, in particular, the role of the CO2 increases during the last century.

В 1999 году журнал «Time» включил Александра Флеминга в список 100 героев и кумиров XX века, заявив, что «открытие Флеминга породило огромную фармацевтическую промышленность, производящую синтетические пенициллины, направленные на борьбу с некоторыми самыми древними заболеваниями человечества, в числе которых сифилис, гангрена и туберкулез». По некоторым оценкам антибиотики спасли свыше 200 миллионов человек, а их открытие прибавило примерно 20 лет к средней продолжительности жизни человека в развитых странах.Александр Флеминг родился 6 августа 1881 года. В 1906 году получил степень Бакалавра Медицины и Бакалавра Хирургии с отличием и стал членом Королевского колледжа хирургов. В 1908 году он получает степень магистра и бакалавра наук в Лондонском университете. В 1922 году Александр Флеминг открывает лизоцим. В1928 г. он становится профессором бактериологии. 7 марта 1929 года, А. Флеминг выделил и описал свойства пенициллина. 12 февраля 1941 года пенициллин был впервые применен для лечения человека. В 1943 году началось промышленное производство антибиотика.В 1944 году Флеминг был возведен в рыцарское достоинство. В 1945 году Нобелевская премия по физиологии и медицине была присуждена А.Флемингу, Х.У.Флори и Э.Б.Чейну «за открытие пенициллина и его целебного воздействия при различных инфекционных болезнях». В 1928–1946 годах А. Флеминг работал профессором микробиологии Лондонского университета, в 1947 возглавил Институт Райта–Флеминга, в 1951–1954 был ректором Эдинбургского университета.А. Флеминг был удостоен 25 почетных степеней, 26 медалей, 18 премий, 30 наград и почетного членства в 89 академиях наук и научных обществах, в том числе, Лондонского королевского общества (1943), Парижской академии наук (1946), Первый президент общества общей микробиологии.Александр Флеминг скончался от инфаркта миокарда 11 марта 1955 года. В 2009 году изображение Флеминга размещено на новой купюре в 5 фунтов стерлингов.

Investigated mostly in a co-dependent relationship with its titular figure – E. Lovinescu (1881-1943), the Romanian literary circle Sburătorul has achieved a paradoxical position in the field of Romanian critical inquiry. On one hand, this particular group is an ever-present reference in research dedicated to the interwar Romanian literary modernist scene. On the other hand, only a few monographic works explore the actual dynamic of this group, and while they are well documented and multi-layered a lot of material remains yet to be explored. The Sburătorul Literary Journals (Sburătorul: Agende literare), kept by E. Lovinescu and subsequently edited and published posthumously by his daughter, Monica Lovinescu, are one of the most valuable yet underestimated bibliographical instruments in Romania. Owing much to this particular instrument, my paper aims to investigate the human resource of Sburătorul literary circle. The methodology of my paper stands at the intersection between network studies, distant reading, and sociology and within these theoretical frameworks I intend to explore the relationships and dynamics between the most active members of the group, in order to “measure” the symbolic capital of the group.

The “Archive” section publishes four fragments selected from studies of Italian authors who wrote about children’s literature — the writers and teachers Giuseppe Fanciulli (1881–1951) and Olindo Giacobbe (1880–1950), the children writer, translator and publisher Mary Tibaldi-Chiesa (1896–1968) and teacher Olga Visentini (1893–1961). These works, written between 1926 and 1943, are taken from textbooks and are interesting in that they present the view of Italian experts on Russian children’s literature. The authors build the history of Russian literature for children, give an overview of contemporary émigré children’s literature, and try to determine the national identity of children’s literature in Russia. Giuseppe Fanciulli turns to Russian folklore, to the fairy tale genre and brings the line of his research to the beginning of the 20 th century. The work of Mary Tibaldi-Chiesa gives a detailed review of translations of Russian literature into Italian, made with a focus on children’s and youthful readers, and also presents a detailed biography of Alexander Pushkin. Olga Visentini’s essay is based on the previous experience of Olindo Giacobbe, supplementing and continuing his work up to the first attempts at Soviet children’s literature.

Władysław E. Sikorski urodził się 20 maja 1881 r. w Tuszowie Narodowym pod Mielcem. Ukończył Politechnikę Lwowską. Do 1918 r. działał w ruchu niepodległościowym, był współtwórcą Legionów Polskich i Naczelnego Komitetu Narodowego. W 1915 r. popadł w konflikt z Józefem Piłsudskim na tle sposobów odbudowy państwowości polskiej u boku Austro-Węgier i werbunku do Legionów Polskich. Od 12 października 1918 r. służył w Wojsku Polskim. W czasie wojny polsko-bolszewickiej (1919–1920) podczas bitwy warszawskiej w sierpniu 1920 r. dowodził z powodzeniem 5 Armią. Po zabójstwie prezydenta Gabriela Narutowicza 16 grudnia 1922 r. jeszcze tego samego dnia powołany został na stanowisko prezesa Rady Ministrów RP i ministra spraw wewnętrznych. W tym trudnym i niebezpiecznym dla Polski czasie, wbrew pozorom, to funkcja nie tyle premiera, co ministra spraw wewnętrznych dawała gen. Władysławowi Sikorskiemu realną władzę i możliwość bezpośredniego oddziaływania na sytuację wewnętrzną w kraju, zwłaszcza na stan jego bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego. Generał Sikorski dokonał zmian personalnych w strukturze resortu, usuwając z niego osoby odpowiedzialne politycznie i służbowo za wypadki grudniowe 1922 r. Realizował politykę administracyjną resortu, której głównym celem było utrzymanie spokoju i bezpieczeństwa publicznego poprzez zwalczenie partii i ugrupowań politycznych, które wprost i jawnie zmierzały do obalenia dotychczasowego porządku polityczno-społecznego. Wiele uwagi minister spraw wewnętrznych poświęcał sprawom mniejszości narodowych, zwłaszcza ukraińskiej i białoruskiej, jak też sytuacji społeczno-politycznej na Kresach Wschodnich. Przygotował całościową politykę państwa wobec mniejszości narodowych, której podstawą była koncepcja asymilacji politycznej (państwowej). Gabinet gen. W. Sikorskiego upadł 26 maja 1923 r., a w stanie dymisji działał do 28 maja 1923 r. W latach 1923–1943 gen. W. Sikorski pełnił m.in. funkcję ministra spraw wojskowych (1924–1925), a po klęsce wrześniowej 1939 r. na obczyźnie (we Francji i Anglii) sprawował funkcję premiera Rządu Obrony Narodowej i Naczelnego Wodza. Zginął w katastrofie lotniczej w Gibraltarze 4 lipca 1943 r.

The publication contains review of the genera of jumping spiders: Emertonius, Evarcha, Nigorella, Padilothorax, Stagetillus, and delimits five more new genera, provides graphic documentation for species considered recognizable and adds description of four new species. The taxonomic procedures are carried out according to methodology of "pragmatic classification", which stresses importance of graphic diagnostic characters presented in a comparative way (see also review at “Methodological postulates” subchapter). Some new procedures are introduced, testing their acceptability.The following new genera are delimited and described in this paper: Evarcha Simon, 1889 s. s. (a part of Evarcha s. l.), Evacin Prószyński, 2017 gen. n., Evalba Prószyński, 2017 gen. n., Evaneg Prószyński, 2017 gen. n., Evawes Prószyński, 2017 gen. n., Padillothorus gen. n. Genus Emertonius Peckham & Peckham, 1892, misinterpreted twice by the WSC Editors, is reinstated again, with full diagnostic documentation repeated.The following new species are described in this paper - Emertonius koomeni sp. n., Evacin besar sp. n., Evaneg aegiptiaca Prószyński, 2017 sp. n ."Emertonius" palawanensis sp. n.New synonyms documented.Evarcha acuta Wesolowska, 2006 = Evacin acuta (Wesolowska, 2006), comb. n., Evarcha bulbosa Zabka, 1985 = Evacin bulbosa (Zabka, 1985), comb. n., Evarcha cancellata Simon, 1902 = Evacin cancellata (Simon, 1902), comb. n., Evarcha flagellaris Haddad & Wesolowska, 2011= Evacin flagellaris (Haddad & Wesolowska, 2011), Evarcha flavocincta (C. L. Koch, 1846) = Evacin flavocincta (C. L. Koch, 1846) comb. n., Evarcha heteropogon Simon, 1903 = Evacin heteropogon Simon, 1903, comb. n., Evarcha infrastriata (Keyserling, 1881) = Evacin infrastriata (Keyserling, 1881), comb. n., Evarcha karas Wesolowska, 2011 = Evarcha karas (Wesolowska, 2011), comb. n., Evarcha kirghisica Rakov, 1997 = Evacin kirghisica (Rakov, 1997), comb. n., Evarcha kochi Simon, 1902 = Evacin kochi Simon, 1902 comb. n., Evarcha nigrifrons (Koch C.L., 1846) = Evacin nigrifrons (Koch C.L., 1846), comb. n., Evarcha optabilis Fox, 1937 = Evacin optabilis (Fox, 1937), comb. n., Evarcha pococki Zabka, 1985 = Evacin pococki (Zabka 1985), comb. n., Evarcha pulchella Thorell, 1895 = Evacin pulchella (Thorell, 1895), comb. n., Evarcha pseudopococki Peng X., Xie L. & Kim, 1993 = Evacin pseudopococki (Peng X., Xie L. & Kim, 1993), comb. n., Evarcha reiskindi Berry, Beatty, Proszynski, 1996 = Evacin reiskindi (Berry, Beatty, Proszynski, 1996), comb. n., Evarcha simoni[s] (Thorell, 1892)= Evacin simonis (Thorell, 1892), comb. n., Evarcha striolata Wesołowska & Haddad, 2009 = Evacin striolata (Wesołowska & Haddad, 2009), comb. n., Evarcha vitosa Próchniewicz, 1989 = Evacin vitosa (Próchniewicz, 1989), comb. n.Evarcha albaria (L. Koch, 1878) = Evalba albaria (L. Koch, 1878), comb. n., Evarcha coreana Seo, 1988 = Evalba coreana (Seo, 1988), comb. n., Evarcha fasciata Seo, 1992 = Evalba fasciata (Seo, 1988), comb. n., Evarcha paralbaria Song & Chai, 1992 = Evalba paralbaria (Song & Chai, 1992), comb. n., Evarcha selenaria Suguro & Yahata, 2012 = Evalba selenaria (Suguro & Yahata, 2012), comb. n., Evarcha wulingensis Peng, Xie & Kim, 1993 = Evalba wulingensis (Peng, Xie & Kim, 1993), comb. n.Evarcha armeniaca (Logunov, 1999) = Evaneg armeniaca (Logunov, 1999), comb. n., Evarcha darinurica Logunov, 2001 = Evaneg darinurica (Logunov, 2001) , comb. n., Evarcha negevensis (Proszynski, 2000) = Evaneg negevensis (Proszynski, 2000) comb. n., Evarcha nenilini Rakov, 1997= Evaneg nenilini (Rakov, 1997), comb. n., Evarcha nepos ( O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872) = Evaneg nepos (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872), comb. n., Evarcha nigricans Dalmas, 1920 = Evaneg nigricans (Dalmas, 1920), comb. n.,Evarcha pileckii Proszynski, 2000 = Evaneg pileckii (Proszynski, 2000), comb. n., Evarcha praeclara Prószyński & Wesolowska, in Prószyński, 2003 = Evaneg praeclara (Prószyński & Wesolowska, in Prószyński, 2003), comb. n., Evarcha seyun Wesolowska W., van Harten, 2007 = Evaneg seyun (Wesolowska W., van Harten, 2007), comb. n., Neaetha aegyptiaca Denis, 1947 female only = Evaneg aegyptiaca (Prószyński, 2017) ), comb. n., Neaetha aegyptiaca Denis, 1947 male only = Hyllus aegyptiacus (Denis, 1947), comb. n.Evarcha arabica Wesolowska & van Harten, 2007 = Evawes arabica (Wesolowska & van Harten, 2007) comb. n., Evarcha awashi Wesolowska & Tomasiewicz, 2008 = Evawes awashi (Wesolowska & Tomasiewicz, 2008) comb. n., Evarcha bakorensis Wesolowska & Russel-Smith 2011 = Evawes bakorensis (Wesolowska, Russel-Smith 2011) comb.n., Evarcha bicuspidata Peng & Li, 2003 = Evawes bicuspidata (Peng & Li, 2003) comb. n., Evarcha bihastata Wesolowska & Russell-Smith, 2000 = Evawes bihastata (Wesolowska & Russell-Smith, 2000), comb.n., Evarcha carbonaria (Lessert, 1927) = Evawes carbonaria (Lessert, 1927), comb.n., Evarcha chubbi Lessert, 1925 = Evawes chubbi (Lessert, 1925), comb. n., Evarcha culicivora Wesolowska & Jackson 2003 = Evawes culicivora (Wesolowska & Jackson 2003) comb. n., Evarcha denticulata Wesołowska & Haddad, 2013 = Evawes denticulata (Wesołowska & Haddad, 2013), comb.n., Evarcha elegans Wesolowska & Russel-Smith, 2000 = Evawes elegans (Wesolowska & Russel-Smith, 2000), comb. n., Evarcha ignea Wesołowska & Cumming 2008= Evawes ignea (Wesołowska & Cumming 2008), comb. n., Evarcha jucunda (Lucas, 1846) = Evawes jucunda (Lucas, 1846) comb. n., Evarcha longula (Thorell, 1881) = Evawes longula (Thorell, 1881) comb. n., Evarcha maculata Rollard & Wesolowska, 2002 = Evawes maculata (Rollard & Wesolowska, 2002), comb. n., Evarcha madagascariensis Proszynski, 1992 = Evawes madagascariensis (Proszynski, 1992), comb. n., Evarcha mirabilis Wesołowska & Haddad 2009 = Evawes mirabilis (Wesołowska & Haddad 2009), comb.n., Evarcha patagiata (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872) = Evawes patagiata (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872), comb.n., Evarcha picta Wesolowska & van Harten, 2007 = Evawes picta (Wesolowska & van Harten, 2007), comb. n., Evarcha pinguis Wesołowska & Tomasiewicz, 2008 = Evawes pinguis (Wesołowska, Tomasiewicz, 2008), comb. n., Evarcha prosimilis Wesolowska & Cumming, 2008= Evawes prosimilis (Wesolowska & Cumming, 2008), comb. n., Evarcha zimbabwensis Wesolowska & Cumming, 2008 = Evawes zimbabwensis (Wesolowska & Cumming, 2008), comb. n.Evarcha hirticeps (Song & Chai, 1992) = Nigorella hirticeps (Song & Chai, 1992), comb. n., Evarcha hunanensis Peng, Xie & Kim, 1993 - withdrawal from synonymy = Nigorella hunanensis (Peng, Xie & Kim, 1993), comb. n., Evarcha petrae Prószyński, 1992 = Nigorella petrae (Prószyński, 1992), comb. n., Evarcha sichuanensis Peng, Xie & Kim, 1993 = Nigorella sichuanensis (Peng, Xie & Kim, 1993), comb. n.Hyllus fischeri Bösenberg & Strand, 1906 = Evacin fischeri (Bösenberg & Strand, 1906), comb. n. (separated from synonymy of Evarcha flavocincta).Hasarius simonis Thorell, 1892 = Evacin simonis (Thorell, 1892), comb. n. (separated from synonymy of Evarcha flavocincta).Myrmarachne aureonigra Edmunds, Prószyński, 2003) = Myrmaplata aureonigra (Edmunds, Prószyński, 2003), comb. n.Myrmarachne exasperans (Peckham & Peckham, 1892) = Emertonius exasperans Peckham & Peckham, 1892 (return to original combination),"Myrmarachne" "exasperans": Wanless 1978: 235, f. 1A-F, not f. 2) (male from Palawan only) = "Emertonius" palawanensis sp. n.,Myrmarachne grossa Edmunds & Prószyński, 2003 = Toxeus grossus (Edmunds & Prószyński, 2003) comb. n.Neaetha aegyptiaca Denis, 1947 (in part - female) = Evaneg aegiptiaca Prószyński, 2017, sp. n., Neaetha aegyptiaca Denis, 1947 (in part - male) = Hyllus aegiptiacus (Denis, 1947) comb. n.Stagetillus elegans (Reimoser, 1927) = Padillothorus elegans Reimoser, 1927, comb. n., reinstated original combination, Stagetillus semiostrinus (Simon, 1901) = Padillothorax semiostrinus Simon, 1901, comb. n., reinstated original combination, Stagetillus taprobanicus (Simon, 1902) = Padillothorax taprobanicus Simon, 1902, comb. n., reinstated original combination.Viciria alba Peckham & Peckham, 1903 = Evacin alba (Peckham & Peckham, 1903), comb. n.Correction of the following synonyms (rejecting biologically misleading changes by the WSC) documented in this paper. Colyttus kerinci (Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) = Donoessus kerinci Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 (returned to the previous combination), Colyttus nigriceps (Simon, 1899) = Donoessus nigriceps (Simon, 1899) (returned to the previous combination), Colyttus striatus (Simon, 1902) = Donoessus striatus Simon, 1902 (returned to the previous combination),Coryphasia heros (Bryant, 1943) = Dinattus heros Bryant, 1943 (returned to the previous combination), Jollas armatus (Bryant, 1943) = "Oningis" armatus Bryant, 1943 (returned to the previous combination), Jollas crassus (Bryant, 1943) = "Oningis" crassus Bryant, 1943 (returned to the previous combination), Laufeia daiqini (Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) = Junxattus daiqini Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 (returned to the previous combination), Laufeia eucola (Thorell, 1890) = Orcevia eucola Thorell, 1890 (returned to the previous combination), Laufeia keyserlingi (Thorell, 1890) = Orcevia keyserlingi Thorell, 1890 (returned to the previous combination), Laufeia kuloni (Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) = Orcevia kuloni Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012, (returned to the previous combination,), Laufeia minuta (Prószyński, 1992) = Lechia minuta (Prószyński, 1992) (returned to the previous combination), Laufeia proszynskii Song, Gu & Chen, 1988= Orcevia proszynskii (Song, Gu & Chen, 1988) (returned to the previous combination), Laufeia squamata = Lechia squamata (returned to the previous combination)Notice on pending revisions Evaneg praeclara (Prószyński & Wesolowska in Prószyński, 2003) (= "Evarcha praeclara") is a composite species, pending taxonomic revision, "Myrmarachne" kilifi Wanless, 1978 - placement and diagnostic characters pending revision, "Myrmarachne" laurentina Bacelar, 1953 - placement and diagnostic characters pending revision.Removal from Evarcha: Evarcha wenxianensis Tang & Yang, 1995 = Yaginumaella wenxianensis (Tang & Yang, 1995) (Fig, 15R).

An initial contribution to the revision of the genus Dziriblatta Chopard, 1936a, formerly synonymized erroneously with Lobolampra Houlbert, 1927, is presented. The species of the genus, hitherto placed in the subgenera Phyllodromica, Arbiblatta Chopard, 1936a and Lobolampra Houlbbert, 1927, of the genus Phyllodromica Fieber 1853, are distributed on the northern Macaronesian Islands, in southern Spain, North Africa, and the Near East (Israel, Cyprus). The genus is divided into nine new subgenera: Autumnoblatta subgen. nov., Blattantis subgen. nov., Discleroblatta subgen. nov., Dziriblatta subgen. nov., Macaroblatta subgen. nov., Monoscleroblatta subgen. nov., Pauciscleroblatta subgen. nov., Sculptoblatta subgen. nov., and Sulcoblatta subgen. nov.. The characteristics of the genus and its subgenera are described including also a determination key which allows the discrimination of the subgenera in both sexes. The presumable phylogenetic position of the genus and the relationships between the subgenera are discussed and shown in cladograms. The described species and their distribution are shown in numerous figures and distribution maps, respectively.Three new species are described: Dziriblatta (Sculptoblatta) prisca spec. nov., Dziriblatta (Autumnoblatta) nasuta spec. nov., and Dziriblatta (Macaroblatta) dendroglandulosa spec. nov. Nomenclatory changes: The species Blatta carpetana Bolívar, 1873, is designated as lectotype for the subgenus Lobolampra Houlbert, 1927. New synonyms: Aphlebia cazurroi Bolívar, 1885, is a junior synonym of Dziriblatta algerica (Bolívar, 1881); Dziriblatta theryi Chopard, 1936a, Hololampra finoti Bolívar, 1914, and Lobolampra adelungi Chopard, 1943, are synonyms of Dz. (Pauciscleroblatta) kroumiriensis (Adelung, 1914); Dz. vicina Chopard, 1936b, is a synonym of Dz. (Monoscleroblatta) merrakescha (Adelung, 1914).

Edward Battersby Bailey (1881-1965), Director of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, visited the 6-km2 Gibraltar peninsula twice in 1943, in transit from/to England and the Mediterranean island of Malta. He spent only five days in total on Gibraltar, but submitted two influential reports to its Fortress Headquarters, guided by rock features exposed by recent quarrying. On his recommendation, a deep borehole was drilled below the northern isthmus in an attempt to locate a supposed aquifer in Cenozoic sandstones believed to extend south from Spain, and A. L. Greig (a graduate of Imperial College, London, serving locally in the ranks of the Royal Engineers) prepared a new geological map (at 1:5,280) and a report to help guide tunnel excavation within the bedrock. Between 1945 and 1948, Lieutenant (later Captain) G. B. Alexander (a graduate of the University of Cambridge also serving in the Royal Engineers) generated a much more detailed map (at 1:2,500) of the bedrock plus superficial deposits, together with associated diagrams and geotechnical reports. These unpublished documents, and fossils collected during their preparation, influenced a re-interpretation of Gibraltar (as the remnant of an overturned limb of a klippe of Early Jurassic dolomitic limestone thrust into position during the Betic-Rif Orogeny), published by Bailey in 1953. A report to accompany Alexander's map was never completed, but documents constituting the most complete record known of his Gibraltar work are now preserved within the archives of the British Geological Survey. Reserve army officers later compiled a geological map of Gibraltar (at 1:10,000) published by the Royal Engineers in 1991. Thereafter, as garrison strength became greatly reduced, work under military auspices was increasingly superseded by civilian research.

Esta investigación se realizó en las playas Nombre de Dios, Viento Frio, y Palenque, que están ubicadas en el Distrito de Santa Isabel, Costa Arriba de la Provincia de Colón. Las muestras se colectaron de forma manual, luego fueron colocadas en envases plásticos rotulados. para luego ser trasladadas al laboratorio de la Escuela de Biología del Centro Regional Universitario de Colón donde se limpiaron y luego se caracterizaron, a nivel de especie Además de un análisis de varianza, y se calcularon índices de diversidad como al alfa de Williams, de dominancia como el Berger-Parker o el de Margaleff, Se encontró que no hubo diferencia de abundancia significativa (F=0.5984; p>0.5552) entre las playas. Los índices de diversidad indicaron que hubo una gran equidad en la distribución de las especies en las playas, siendo Viento Frío la de mayor equidad con 6,92; la dominancia fue baja, el mayor valor se obtuvo en Viento Frío, con 0,33. Para el índice de Margaleff, el mayor valor fue en Nombre de Dios a 18,863. Se colectaron 134 individuos pertenecientes a 28 especies, 20 géneros, de los cuales la especie más abundante fue Littorina ziczac (Gmelin, 1791), con 24 individuos, Tanto Nerita versicolor (Gmelin, 1791) con 19, y Nerita tesellata (Gmelin, 1791) con 12, mientras que Certhiopsis greeni (C. B. Adams, 1838) con 15. También se reportaron 13 especies con un solo individuo: Arene variabilis (Dall, 1889), Batillaria mínima (Gmelin, 1791), Cerithium atratum (Born,1778), Cymatium parthemopeum (von Salis, 1793), Leurosyrinx verrillii (Dall, 1881), Mitra barbadensis (Gmelin, 1791), Ocenebra muricoides (C. B Adams, 1845), Polinices hepaticus (Röding, 1869), Purpura patula (Linnaeaus, 1758), Tachypollia didyma (Schwengel, 1943), Terebra cinerea Born, 1778 y Turbinella angulata (Lightfoot, 1786).

ABSTRACTThis paper deals with the evolution of ideas concerning the configuration of flow patterns of the great inland ice sheets east of the Cordillera. The interpretations of overall extent of Laurentide ice have changed little in a century (except in the Arctic) but the manner of growth, centres of outflow, and ice-flow patterns, remain somewhat controversial. Present geological data however, clearly favour the notion of multiple centres of ice flow. The first map of the extent of the North American ice cover was published in 1881. A multi-domed concept of the ice sheet was illustrated in an 1894 sketch-map of radial flow from dispersal areas east and west of Hudson Bay. The first large format glacial map of North America was published in 1913. The binary concept of the ice sheet was in vogue until 1943 when a single centre in Hudson Bay was proposed, based on the westward growth of ice from Labrador/Québec. This Hudson dome concept persisted but was not illustrated until 1977. By this time it was evident from dispersal studies that the single dome concept was not viable. Dispersal studies clearly indicate long-continued westward ice flow from Québec into and across southern Hudson Bay, as well as eastward flow from Keewatin into the northern part of the bay. Computer-type modelling of the Laurentide ice sheet(s) further indicates their complex nature. The distribution of two indicator erratics from the Proterozoicage Belcher Island Fold Belt Group help constrain ice flow models. These erratics have been dispersed widely to the west, southwest and south by the Labrador Sector of more than one Laurentide ice sheet. They are abundant across the Paleozoic terrain of the Hudson-James Bay lowland, but decrease in abundance across the adjoining Archean upland. Similar erratics are common in northern Manitoba in the zone of confluence between Labrador and Keewatin Sector ice. Scattered occurences across the Prairies occur within the realm of south-flowing Keewatin ice. As these erratics are not known, and presumably not present, in Keewatin, they indicate redirection and deposition by Keewatin ice following one or more older advances of Labrador ice. The distribution of indicator erratics thus test our concepts of ice sheet growth.

En este estudio analizaremos el recorrido de los católicos reaccionarios a partir de la Guerra de Independencia y su cambio de antinacionales a nacional-católicos hasta convertirse en fascistizados en el periodo entre la Guerra Civil y el estallido de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. En ese sentido cabe destacar la labor de José Pemartín. La centralidad del estudio la ocupan tres temas contenidos en su obra más importante, Qué es lo Nuevo: la diferencia de matices con respecto a los valores expresados por otros intelectuales nacional-católicos anteriores y contemporáneos a él; la tentativa de conciliar el ideario nacional-católico con las ideas falangistas; y la doctrina fascista. Palabras clave: nacional-catolicismo, fascismo, monarquismo, institucional, circunstancial, tradicionalismo.Topónimo: EspañaPeríodo: Siglo XX ABSTRACTThis study analyses the path traversed by Catholic reactionaries after the War of Independence and their transition from antinational to National Catholic until they converted to Fascism during the period between the Civil War and the outbreak of World War Two. In this respect, it is worth highlighting the work of José Pemartín. This study mainly focuses on three themes in his most important creation, Qué es lo Nuevo: the differences in tone in comparison with the values expressed by both earlier and coetaneous National-Catholic intellectuals; the attempt to reconcile National-Catholic ideology with Falangist thinking; and Fascist doctrine. Keywords: Nacional-Catholism, Fascism, monarchism, institutional, circumstantial, traditionalismPlace names: SpainPeriod: Siglo XX REFERENCIASÁlvarez Junco, J. (2017), Dioses útiles, Naciones y nacionalismos, Barcelona, Galaxia Gutenberg.— (2017), Mater dolorosa. La idea de España en el siglo XIX, Madrid, Taurus.Aranguren López, J. L. (1996), Moral, Sociología y política I, Madrid, Trotta.Balmes, J. (1840) [1975], Consideraciones políticas sobre la situación de España. Madrid, Doncel.— (1842) [2019], El protestantismo comparado con el catolicismo. I: En su relación con la civilización europea, Londres, Independently published.Beneyto Pérez, J. (1939), El nuevo Estado español. El régimen nacionalsindicalista ante la tradición, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva.— (1939), Genio y figura del Movimiento, Madrid, Ediciones Afrodisio Aguado.Blinkhorn, M. (1990), Fascists and conservatives. The Radical Right and the Establishment en Twentieth Century Europe, Londres, Routledge Edition.Botti, A. (2008), Cielo y dinero. El nacionalcatolicismo en España (1881-1975), Madrid, Alianza Editorial.Box Varela, Z. (2013), El nacionalismo durante el franquismo, en A. Morales Moya, J. P. Fusi Aizpurúa y A. de Blas Guerrero (dirs.), Historia de la nación y del nacionalismo español, Barcelona, Galaxia Gutenberg, pp. 904-913.— (2010), España, año cero. La construcción simbólica del franquismo, Madrid, Alianza Editorial. Casali, L. (1995), Fascismi: partito, societá e Stato nei documenti del fascismo, del nazionalsocialismo e del franchismo, Bologna, Clueb.Casals, X. (2016), La transición española: el voto ignorado de las armas, Barcelona, Pasado Presente.Castro Sánchez, Á. (2018), La utopía reaccionaria de José Pemartí (1888-1954). Una historia genética de la derecha española, Cádiz, Servicio de publicaciones de la universidad de Cádiz. — (2014), Ontología del tiempo y nacionalcatolicismo en José Pemartín y Sanjuán (1888-1954). Genealogía de un pensador reaccionario, Madrid, UNED.Conde García, F. J. (1942), Contribución a la doctrina del caudillaje, Madrid, Ediciones de la vicesecretaría de Educación Popular.Cuenca Toribio, J. M. (2008), Nacionalismo, Franquismo y Nacional-catolicismo, Madrid, Actas.Di Febo, G. (2004), La Cruzada y la politización de lo sagrado. Un Caudillo providencial, en J. Tusell, E. Gentile, G. Di Febo. (2015): Fascismo y Franquismo, cara a cara: una perspectiva histórica, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva.D’Ors, E. (1943): La civilización en la historia, Madrid, Ediciones Españolas.Felice, R. de. (1974), Mussolini il Duce, I, Gli anni del consenso, Turín, Einaudi.Fusi, Aizpurúa, J. P. (1986), Franco. Madrid, Ediciones El País.Gallego, F. (2014), El Evangelio fascista, Barcelona, Crítica.— (2005), Ramiro Ledesma Ramos y el fascismo español, en F. Gallego y F. Morente, Fascismo en España, Barcelona, El Viejo Topo.García Morente, M. (1938), Idea de la hispanidad, Buenos Aires, Espasa-Calpe.Gentile, E. (2010), Contro Cesare: Cristianesimo e totalitarismo nell’epoca dei fascismi, Roma, Laterza.— (2013), Fascismo. Storia e interpretazione, Roma, Laterza.— (2009), Il culto del littorio, Roma, Laterza.Gentile, G. (1929), Origine e dottrina del fascismo, Roma, Libreria del Littorio.Giménez Caballero, E. (1938), España y Franco, Cegama, Ediciones “Los combatientes”, Fascículo doctrinal Fe y Acción.— (1934), Genio de España, Madrid, Doncel.González Cuevas, F. (1998), Acción Española. Teología política y nacionalismo autoritario en España (1913-1936), Madrid, Tecnos.Griffin R. (2007), Modernism and Fascism. The sense of a beginning under Mussolini and Hitler, Palgrave, Macmillan.— (1993), The nature of fascism, Londres, Routledge.Hegel, F. (1807) [2020], Fenomenología del espíritu, Leicester, Independently Published.— (1837) [2007], Lecciones sobre la filosofía de la historia, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.Imatz, A. (2003), José Antonio. Falange Española y el nacionalsindicalismo, Madrid, Plataforma.Juliá, S. (2015), Historias de las dos España, Madrid, Taurus.Laín Entralgo, P. (1941), Los valores morales del nacionalsindicalismo, Madrid, Aguirre.Ledesma Ramos, R. (1939), Discurso a las juventudes de España, Madrid, Ediciones Fe.— (1935) [2017], ¿Fascismo en España? Sus orígenes, su desarrollo, sus hombres, Almuzara, Edición Almuzara.Luca, G. de (1934), Idee chiare, Il Frontespizio, 4.Maeztu, R. de (1934) [2018], Defensa de la hispanidad, Londres, Amazon.— (1975), El sentido reverencial del dinero, Madrid, Editora Nacional.— (1927), La magia del orden, La Nación, Madrid.Maurel, M. (2005), Un asunto de fe: Fascismo en España (1933-1936), en F. Gallego y F. Morente, Fascismo en España, Madrid, El Viejo Topo.Menéndez y Pelayo, M. (1882) [2001], Historia de los heterodoxos españoles, Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Montes, E. (1934), Discurso a la catolicidad española, Acción Española, IV, 50.Moradiellos, E. (2016), Las caras de Franco. Una revisión histórica del Caudillo y su régimen, Madrid, Siglo XXI de España Editores.Morodo, R. (1985), Los orígenes ideológicos del franquismo: Acción Española, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.Mosse, G. (2005), La nacionalización de las masas, Madrid, Marcial Pons.— (2015), Le origini culturali del terzo Reich, Milán, Il Saggiatore.Mussolini, B. y Gentile, G. (1932), La dottrina del fascismo, Roma, Enciclopedia Italiana.Nuñez Seixas, X. M. (2018), Suspiros de España. El nacionalismo español (1808-2018), Barcelona, Crítica.Orestano, F. (1939), Il nuovo Realismo, Milán, Fratelli Bocca,Pemán y Pemartín, J. M. El discurso del señor Pemán radiado anoche, ABC, Sevilla, 26 de agosto de 1936.— (1939) [2015], La historia de España contada con sencillez, Madrid, Ediciones San Román.Pemartín y Sanjuán, J. (1941), Introducción a una filosofía de lo temporal, Madrid, Espasa Calpe.— (1938): Los orígenes del Movimiento, Burgos, Publicaciones del Ministerio de Educación nacional— (1938): ¿Qué es lo nuevo? Consideraciones sobre el momento español presente, Santander, Cultura Española.Pérez Monfort, R. (1992), Hispanismo y Falange. Los sueños imperiales de la derecha española, Ciudad de México: FCE.Preston, P. (1994), Franco “Caudillo de España”, Barcelona, Grijalbo Mondadori.Quiroga Fernández de Soto, A. (2008), Haciendo españoles. La nacionalización de las masas en la dictadura de Primo de Rivera (1923-1930), Madrid, CEPC.— (2007), Los orígenes del nacionalcatolicismo. José Pemartín y la dictadura de Primo de Rivera, Granada, Comares.Redondo, O. (1932), El Nacionalismo no debe ser confesional, Libertad.Reig Tapia. (1995), Franco “Caudillo”: Mito e realidad, Madrid, Tecnos.Río Cisneros, A. del (1968), José Antonio Intímo. Textos Biográficos y epistolario, Madrid, Ediciones del Movimiento.Rocco, A. (1925), La dottrina del fascismo e il suo posto nella storia del pensiero politico, en Renzo de Felice (1971), Autobiografia del fascismo. Antologia di testi fascisti (1919-1945), Roma, Minerva Italica.— (1938), Scritti e discorsi politici di Alfredo Rocco, Milán, Giuffré Editore.Sardá y Salvany, F. (1884) [2011], El liberalismo es pecado, Barcelona, Librería y tipografía católica.— (1883), La Gran tesis española, El Correo Catalán.Saz Campos, I. (2003), España contra España. Los nacionalismos franquistas, Madrid, Marcial Pons.— (2004), Fascismo y franquismo, PUV, Valencia.— (2013), Las caras del franquismo, Comares, Granada.Scheler, M. (1936), El resentimiento en la Moral, Madrid, Espasa Calpe.Sepúlveda Muñoz, I. (2005), I. El sueño de la madre patria: hispanoamericanismo y nacionalismo, Madrid, Marcial Pons.Spengler, O. (1923) [2011], La decadencia de Occidente, Barcelona, Austral.— (1933) [2011], Los años decisivos, Madrid, Altera.Spinetti, G. S. (1933), Il concetto della natura umana, La Sapienza, 1.Tarquini, A. (2013), Il Gentile dei fascisti. Gentiliani e antigentiliani nel regime fascista, Bolonia, Il Mulino.Tomás, J. M. (2001), La Falange de Franco: Fascismo y fascistización en el régimen franquista (1937-1945), Barcelona: Plaza y Janes.— (2019), Los fascismos españoles, Barcelona, Ariel.Tovar, A. (1941), El imperio de España, Madrid, Ediciones Afrodísio Aguado.Tusell, J. (1997), Las derechas en la España contemporánea, Madrid, UNED.— (2006), La historia de España en el siglo XX: La dictadura de Franco, Taurus, Madrid.Tuñon de Lara, M. (1993), El régimen de Franco (1936-1975), Madrid, UNED.Vegas Latapie, E. (1938), Romanticismo y democracia, Santander, Cultura Española.— (1989), Los caminos del desengaño. Memorias políticas (1936-1938), Madrid, Tebas.Viñas, A. (2007), Franco, Hitler y el estallido de la Guerra Civil. Antecedentes y consecuencias. Alianza Editorial: Madrid.

Although Timişoara did not have a University to concentrate an academically elite, there has been an exceptionally intellectuality who was constantly preoccupied to form provincial individuality. One of the most remarkable representative personalities in the Banat was Cornel Grofşorean. " e study deals in the fi rst part about his personality with some biographical details. In the second part there is an analyses of a scientifi cally research manuscript.Born in the 1881 in the village Periam, he was the child of Ioan and Iulia. He graduates primary school in Debeleanca and Covăciţa and secondary in Panciova, Becicherecul Mare, Lugoj and Sibiu. In 1905 he graduated the University form Budapesta and in 1906 the Law Academy in Oradea. In 1907, graduate the Commercial Superior School from Kesmark. In 1909 got the PhD at the Cluj University.Cornel Grofşorean opened a law offi ce in Lugoj, short time after that had been to war in Italy between 1915–1918.At the age of 38, accepted the fi rst public job at Reşiţa, and then he got into the politics, became member of Partidul Poporului ruled by gen. Alexandru Averescu. " e public responsibilities did not stop here. He become mayor of Timişoara two times and then deputy in 1926. After that, he quit political aff aires and never gets back. In 1932 while was the mayor for the second time, he set up with Iosif Nemoianu and Victor Blaşian, Social Institute of Banat-Crişana. " e moment was very important, special guest coming from Bucharest was Dimitrie Gusti. He was not there by chance, but on purpose. " e activity of the new Institute follows the Romanian Social Institute ruled by Dimitrie Gusti. " e pattern of the monographic campaigns based on his concept, used as a pattern of as well. " e specifi c of Banat claims for this pattern to be adapted, Gusti’s scheme being very fl exible. Cornel Grofşorean was at the fi rst chief section, director and at the 1938 president of the Institute. From the beginning, the activity based on public conferences and later on, monographic campaigns. " ese focused on the main problems existing in the region such as lower down the birth rate, loosing identity for the Romanians peasants or the industrial infl uence on peasants. One of the most important moments in the ISBC existence was the participation at the Peace Conference. In 1943 Cornel Grofşorean was contact by Alexandru Marta and Silviu Dragomir, to represents Banat at the Peace Conference doing some reports of the signifi cance aspects. At the second part, the study deals about a scientifi c material made by Cornel Grofşorean called “" e research of Banat village” for an exceptional occasion, which was the World Sociology Congress in Bucharest 1939. " e participation of Social Institute of Banat-Crişana through Cornel Grofşorean at this event means an international recognition of importance and prestige. Unfortunately the study made for this, was never presents because the Second World War started.

Abstract Cryphalini Lindemann, 1877 are a speciose group of mostly miniscule beetles. The tribe Cryphalini is reviewed here which resulted in taxonomic and nomenclatural changes. This revision follows a recent molecular phylogenomic re-analysis focused on the tribe and related scolytine taxa. The analysis demonstrated that the tribe is polyphyletic, as found in other molecular phylogenies. To ensure monophyletic classification, we present a revision of the former tribe with two tribes resurrected, one described, and several genera transferred to other existing tribes. Additionally, extensive generic synonymy, and new combinations are presented. A key, photographs, and illustrations are provided to enable an accurate determination of genera. The revised Cryphalini contains only CryphalusErichson, 1836 (=Hypocryphalus Hopkins, 1915 syn. nov.; Margadillius Hopkins, 1915 syn. nov.). Coriacephilini Johnson trib. nov. contains only Coriacephilus Schedl, 1939. Ernoporini Nüsslin, 1911 stat. res. contains EidophelusEichhoff, 1876 (=Scolytogenes Eichhoff, 1878 syn. nov.; PtilopodiusHopkins, 1915syn. nov.; ErnoporicusBerger, 1917syn. nov.; CryphalogenesWood, 1980syn. nov.); ErnoporusThomson, 1859 (=ErnocladiusWood, 1980syn. nov.; AllothenemusBright and Torres, 2006syn. nov.); Hemicryphalus Schedl, 1963; and ProcryphalusHopkins, 1915. Trypophloeini Nüsslin, 1911 stat. res. includes the genera Afrocosmoderes Johnson and Jordal gen. nov.; AtomothenemusBright, 2019; Cosmoderes Eichhoff, 1878 (=AllernoporusKurentsov, 1941syn. nov.); HypothenemusWestwood, 1834 (=PeriocryphalusWood, 1971syn. nov.); MacrocryphalusNobuchi, 1981stat. res.; Microcosmoderes Johnson and Jordal gen. nov.; MicrosomusBright, 2019; PygmaeoborusBright, 2019; and TrypophloeusFairmaire, 1864. Xyloterini LeConte, 1876 is maintained, containing Indocryphalus Eggers, 1939; TrypodendronStephens, 1830 and XyloterinusSwaine, 1918. AcorthylusBrèthes, 1922, CryptocarenusEggers, 1937, Neocryphus Nunberg, 1956, Stegomerus Wood, 1967, and TrypolepisBright, 2019 are transferred to Corthylini LeConte, 1876. Stephanopodius Schedl, 1963 is transferred to Xyloctonini Eichhoff, 1878. As a consequence of generic synonymy, the following new or resurrected combinations are proposed: Cosmoderes euonymi (Kurentsov, 1941) comb. nov.; Cryphalus aciculatus (Schedl, 1939) comb. nov.; Cryphalus afiamalus (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov.; Cryphalus angustior Eggers, 1927 comb. res.; Cryphalus asper (Broun, 1881) comb. nov.; Cryphalus bakeri (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov.; Cryphalus basihirtusBeeson, 1929comb. nov.; Cryphalus bidentatus (Browne, 1980) comb. nov.; Cryphalus brevior (Schedl, 1943) comb. nov.; Cryphalus carinatus (Browne, 1980) comb. nov.; Cryphalus confusus (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Cryphalus corpulentus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Cryphalus cylindripennis (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov.; Cryphalus cylindrus (Browne, 1950) comb. nov.; Cryphalus densepilosus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Cryphalus dilutus Eichhoff, 1878 comb. res.; Cryphalus discrepans (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Cryphalus discretus Eichhoff, 1878 comb. res.; Cryphalus erythrinae (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Cryphalus fici (Browne, 1986) comb. nov.; Cryphalus glabratus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov.; Cryphalus granulatus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Cryphalus imitans (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov.; Cryphalus interponens (Schedl, 1953) comb. nov.; Cryphalus kalambanganus (Schedl, 1943) comb. nov.; Cryphalus laevis (Browne, 1980) comb. nov.; Cryphalus laticollis (Browne, 1974) comb. nov.; Cryphalus longipennis (Browne, 1970) comb. nov.; Cryphalus longipilis (Browne, 1981) comb. nov.; Cryphalus magnus (Browne, 1984) comb. nov.; Cryphalus malayensis (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Cryphalus mangiferaeStebbing, 1914comb. res.; Cryphalus margadilaonis (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Cryphalus mindoroensis (Schedl, 1943) comb. nov.; Cryphalus minor (Schedl, 1943) comb. nov.; Cryphalus minutus (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Cryphalus mollis Schedl, 1955 comb. res.; Cryphalus moorei (Schedl, 1964) comb. nov.; Cryphalus nigrosetosus (Schedl, 1948) comb. nov.; Cryphalus nitidicollis (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Cryphalus obscurus (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Cryphalus ovalicollis (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Cryphalus papuanus (Schedl, 1973) comb. nov.; Cryphalus piliger (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Cryphalus polynesiae (Schedl, 1979) comb. nov.; Cryphalus quadrituberculatus (Schedl, 1963) comb. nov.; Cryphalus reflexus (Browne, 1980) comb. nov.; Cryphalus robustus Eichhoff, 1872 comb. res.; Cryphalus rotundus (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Cryphalus sandakanensis Schedl, 1937 comb. res.; Cryphalus spathulatus (Schedl, 1938) comb. nov.; Cryphalus striatulus (Browne, 1978) comb. nov.; Cryphalus striatus (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Cryphalus sumatranus (Schedl, 1939) comb. nov.; Cryphalus triangularis (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Cryphalus tutuilaensis (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov.; Eidophelus absonus (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus afer (Schedl, 1970) comb. nov.; Eidophelus africanus (Schedl, 1977) comb. nov.; Eidophelus aitutakii (Beaver and Maddison, 1990) comb. nov.; Eidophelus alniphagus (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus alternans (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus amanicus (Eggers, 1919) comb. nov.; Eidophelus ankius (Schedl, 1979) comb. nov.; Eidophelus apicalis (Schedl, 1971) comb. nov.; Eidophelus approximatus (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus aspericollis (Eichhoff, 1878) comb. nov.; Eidophelus ater (Eggers, 1923) comb. nov.; Eidophelus australis (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Eidophelus badius (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus bambusae (Browne, 1983) comb. nov.; Eidophelus bangensis (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov.; Eidophelus basilaris (Wood, 1960) comb. nov.; Eidophelus birosimensis (Murayama, 1958) comb. nov.; Eidophelus braderi (Browne, 1965) comb. nov.; Eidophelus brimblecombei (Schedl, 1972) comb. nov.; Eidophelus buruensis (Eggers, 1926) comb. nov.; Eidophelus camelliae (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus candidus (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus capucinus (Schedl, 1971) comb. nov.; Eidophelus caucasicus (Lindemann, 1877) comb. nov.; Eidophelus ceylonicus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov.; Eidophelus cicatricosus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Eidophelus coccotrypanoides (Schedl, 1939) comb. nov.; Eidophelus communis (Schaufuss, 1891) comb. nov.; Eidophelus confragosus (Sampson, 1914) comb. nov.; Eidophelus corni (Kurentsov, 1941) comb. nov.; Eidophelus corpulentus (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Eidophelus corrugatus (Schedl, 1950) comb. nov.; Eidophelus creber (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus crenatus (Sampson, 1914) comb. nov.; Eidophelus cylindricus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov.; Eidophelus darwini (Eichhoff, 1878) comb. nov.; Eidophelus devius (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus dubiosus (Wood, 1960) comb. nov.; Eidophelus eggersi (Schedl, 1962) comb. nov.; Eidophelus euphorbiae (Wood, 1980) comb. nov.; Eidophelus excellens (Schedl, 1979) comb. nov.; Eidophelus exiguus (Wood, 1980) comb. nov.; Eidophelus exilis (Yin, 2001) comb. nov.; Eidophelus eximius (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Eidophelus expers (Blandford, 1894) comb. nov.; Eidophelus fagi (Fabricius, 1798) comb. nov.; Eidophelus fijianus (Schedl, 1950) comb. nov.; Eidophelus formosanus (Browne, 1981) comb. nov.; Eidophelus fugax (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus fujisanus (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus fulgens (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus fulgidus (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus fulvipennis (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus ghanaensis (Schedl, 1977) comb. nov.; Eidophelus glabratus (Yin, 2001) comb. nov.; Eidophelus gracilis (Schedl, 1950) comb. nov.; Eidophelus granulatus (Wood, 1960) comb. nov.; Eidophelus grobleri (Schedl, 1962) comb. nov.; Eidophelus hirtus (Wood, 1974) comb. nov.; Eidophelus hobohmi (Schedl, 1955) comb. nov.; Eidophelus hylesinopsis (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus incultus (Yin, 2001) comb. nov.; Eidophelus indicus (Wood, 1989) comb. nov.; Eidophelus insularis (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus insularum (Krivolutskaya, 1968) comb. nov.; Eidophelus jalappae (Letzner, 1849) comb. nov.; Eidophelus javanus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Eidophelus kanawhae (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Eidophelus landolphiae (Schedl, 1961) comb. nov.; Eidophelus leprosulus (Browne, 1974) comb. nov.; Eidophelus longipennis (Eggers, 1936) comb. nov.; Eidophelus magnocularis (Yin, 2001) comb. nov.; Eidophelus marquesanus (Beeson, 1935) comb. nov.; Eidophelus mauritianus (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Eidophelus micans (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov.; Eidophelus minor (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov.; Eidophelus minutissimus (Schedl, 1943) comb. nov.; Eidophelus mus (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus nanulus (Wood, 1960) comb. nov.; Eidophelus nigellatus (Schedl, 1950) comb. nov.; Eidophelus nubilus (Wood, 1960) comb. nov.; Eidophelus ocularis (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Eidophelus onyanganus (Schedl, 1941) comb. nov.; Eidophelus opacus (Schedl, 1959) comb. nov.; Eidophelus pacificus (Schedl, 1941) comb. nov.; Eidophelus papuanus (Schedl, 1974) comb. nov.; Eidophelus papuensis (Wood, 1989) comb. nov.; Eidophelus paradoxus (Wood, 1992) comb. nov.; Eidophelus parvus (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Eidophelus pityophthorinus (Schedl, 1943) comb. nov.; Eidophelus pleiocarpae (Schedl, 1957) comb. nov.; Eidophelus polisquamosus (Yin, 2001) comb. nov.; Eidophelus praeda (Browne, 1978) comb. nov.; Eidophelus puerarae (Choo and Woo, 1989) comb. nov.; Eidophelus pumilionides (Schedl, 1977) comb. nov.; Eidophelus pumilus (Wood, 1960) comb. nov.; Eidophelus punctatulus (Nobuchi, 1976) comb. nov.; Eidophelus punctatus (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov.; Eidophelus puncticollis (Schedl, 1950) comb. nov.; Eidophelus pygmaeolus (Schedl, 1971) comb. nov.; Eidophelus quadridens (Browne, 1983) comb. nov.; Eidophelus ramosus (Beeson, 1935) comb. nov.; Eidophelus robustus (Schedl, 1955) comb. nov.; Eidophelus rugosus (Schedl, 1943) comb. nov.; Eidophelus rusticus (Wood, 1974) comb. nov.; Eidophelus semenovi (Kurentsov, 1941) comb. nov.; Eidophelus separandus (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Eidophelus setifer (Wood, 1974) comb. nov.; Eidophelus sodalis (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Eidophelus spessivtzevi (Berger, 1917) comb. nov.; Eidophelus spirostachius (Schedl, 1958) comb. nov.; Eidophelus splendens (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus squamatilis (Schedl, 1977) comb. nov.; Eidophelus squamosus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Eidophelus squamulosus (Eggers, 1936) comb. nov.; Eidophelus stephegynis (Hopkins, 1915) comb. nov.; Eidophelus takahashii (Nobuchi, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus tarawai (Beaver, 1990) comb. nov.; Eidophelus tonsus (Schedl, 1969) comb. nov.; Eidophelus tricolor (Lea, 1910) comb. nov.; Eidophelus trucis (Wood, 1974) comb. nov.; Eidophelus uncatus (Schedl, 1971) comb. nov.; Eidophelus usagaricus (Eggers, 1922) comb. nov.; Eidophelus varius (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus venustus (Schedl, 1953) comb. nov.; Eidophelus yunnanensis (Yin, 2001) comb. nov.; Eidophelus zachvatkini (Krivolutskaya, 1958) comb. nov.; Ernoporus corpulentus (Sampson, 1919) comb. nov.; Ernoporus exquisitus (Bright, 2019) comb. nov.; Ernoporus guiboutiae (Schedl, 1957) comb. nov.; Ernoporus minutus (Bright and Torres, 2006) comb. nov.; Hypothenemus attenuatus (Eggers, 1935) comb. nov.; Hypothenemus loranthus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Hypothenemus novateutonicus (Schedl, 1951) comb. nov.; Hypothenemus pullus (Wood, 1971) comb. nov. Following assessment of diagnostic characters, the following species were transferred to a different genus: Afrocosmoderes madagascariensis Schedl, 1961 comb. nov.; Afrocosmoderes caplandicus (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Afrocosmoderes grobleri (Schedl, 1961) comb. nov.; Afrocosmoderes niger (Schedl, 1961) comb. nov.; Afrocosmoderes pellitus (Schedl, 1953) comb. nov.; Afrocosmoderes pennatus (Schedl, 1953) comb. nov.; Eidophelus concentralis (Schedl, 1975) comb. nov.; Eidophelus inermis (Browne, 1984) comb. nov.; Eidophelus insignis (Browne, 1984) comb. nov.; Eidophelus kinabaluensis (Bright, 1992) comb. nov.; Eidophelus philippinensis (Schedl, 1967) comb. nov.; Eidophelus podocarpi (Bright, 1992) comb. nov.; Ernoporus imitatrix (Schedl, 1977) comb. nov.; Ernoporus minor (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Ernoporus parvulus (Eggers, 1943) comb. nov.; Indocryphalus sericeus (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov.; Macrocryphalus elongatus (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Macrocryphalus punctipennis (Schedl, 1965) comb. nov.; Microcosmoderes shoreae (Schedl, 1953) comb. nov.; Stegomerus parvatis (Wood, 1974) comb. nov.; Stephanopodius dubiosus (Schedl, 1970) comb. nov. Twenty-nine secondary homonyms were created following genus synonymy, and are designated replacement names: Afrocosmoderes schedli Johnson nom. nov. (=Euptilius madagascariensis Schedl, 1963 syn. nov.); Cryphalus amplicollis Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus laticollis Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Cryphalus eggersi Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus confusus Eggers, 1927 syn. nov.); Cryphalus fuscus Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus cylindrus Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Cryphalus gracilis Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus laevis Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Cryphalus luteus Johnson nom. nov. (=Margadillius fulvus Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Cryphalus minusculus Johnson nom. nov. (=Hypocryphalus minutus Browne, 1980 syn. nov.); Cryphalus ozopemoides Johnson nom. nov. (=Hypocryphalus montanusSchedl, 1974syn. nov.); Cryphalus pellicius Johnson nom. nov. (=Hypocryphalus pilifer Schedl, 1979 syn. nov.); Cryphalus punctistriatulus Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus striatulusBrowne, 1981syn. nov.); Cryphalus schedli Johnson nom. nov. (=Hypocryphalus formosanus Schedl, 1952 syn. nov.); Cryphalus solomonensis Johnson nom. nov. (=Margadillius terminaliae Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Cryphalus spissepilosus Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus densepilosusSchedl, 1943syn. nov.); Cryphalus storckiellae Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus striatusBrowne, 1974syn. nov.); Cryphalus takahashii Johnson nom. nov. (=Euptilius exiguus Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Eidophelus alstoniae Johnson nom. nov. (=Chiloxylon sumatranus Schedl, 1970 syn. nov.); Eidophelus brighti Johnson nom. nov. (=Hemicryphalus minutusBright, 1992syn. nov.); Eidophelus brownei Johnson nom. nov. (=Euptilius papuanus Browne, 1983 syn. nov.); Eidophelus furvus Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalophilus ater Schedl, 1972 syn. nov.); Eidophelus levis Johnson nom. nov. (=Eidophelus gracilis Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Eidophelus lucidus Johnson nom. nov. (=Lepicerinus pacificus Schedl, 1959 syn. nov.); Eidophelus minusculus Johnson nom. nov. (=Eidophelus minutissimus Schedl, 1962 syn. nov.); Eidophelus niger Johnson nom. nov. (=Ernoporicus aterNobuchi, 1975syn. nov.); Eidophelus parvulus Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalus parvus Browne, 1984 syn. nov.); Eidophelus rhododendri Johnson nom. nov. (=Hemicryphalus squamosusBright, 1992syn. nov.); Eidophelus schedli Johnson nom. nov. (=Cryphalomorphus ceylonicus Schedl, 1959 syn. nov.); Eidophelus yinae Johnson nom. nov. (=Scolytogenes venustusYin, 2001syn. nov.); Hypothenemus marginatus Johnson nom. nov. (=Periocryphalus sobrinus Wood, 1974 syn. nov.); Hypothenemus squamosulus Johnson nom. nov. (=Ptilopodius squamosus Schedl, 1953 syn. nov.). Two replacement names are now unnecessary: Cryphalus striatulus (Browne, 1978) stat. res. (=Hypothenemus browneiBeaver, 1991syn. nov.); Macrocryphalus oblongusNobuchi, 1981stat. res. (=Hypothenemus nobuchiiKnížek, 2011syn. nov.). We also acknowledge the original description of several species by Eichhoff, 1878a which have been widely referenced as a later description (Eichhoff, 1878b). The following taxonomic changes are provided to acknowledge the changes: Cryphalus horridusEichhoff, 1878a (=Cryphalus horridusEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov); Cryphalus numidicusEichhoff, 1878a (=Cryphalus numidicusEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov); Cryphalus submuricatusEichhoff, 1878a (=Cryphalus submuricatusEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov); Eidophelus aspericollis (Eichhoff, 1878a) (=Eidophelus aspericollisEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov); Hypothenemus arundinis (Eichhoff, 1878a) (=Hypothenemus arundinisEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov); Hypothenemus birmanus (Eichhoff, 1878a) (=Hypothenemus birmanusEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov); Hypothenemus fuscicollis (Eichhoff, 1878a) (=Hypothenemus fuscicollisEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov); Hypothenemus rotundicollis (Eichhoff, 1878a) (=Hypothenemus rotundicollisEichhoff, 1878bsyn. nov). Subjective species-level changes are minimal. The following synonymies are proposed: Cryphalus papuanus (Schedl, 1973) (=Ernoporus antennariusSchedl, 1974syn. nov.); Eidophelus concentralis (Schedl, 1975) (=Margadillius concentralis Schedl, 1975 syn. nov.). A neotype for Periocryphalus sobrinus Wood, 1974 and its replacement name Hypothenemus marginatusnom. nov. is designated at USNM due to the holotype being lost and replaced with a different species.

At the start of the twentieth century, many young Australian artists travelled abroad to expand their art education and to gain exposure to the modern art movements of Europe. Most of these artists were active members of artist associations such as the Victorian Artists Society or the New South Wales Society of Artists. Male artists from Victoria were generally also members of the Melbourne Savage Club, a club with a strong association with the arts.This paper investigates the dual function of the club, as a space where the artists felt “at home” in the familiar environment that the club offered whilst they were abroad and, at the same time, a meeting space where they could engage in a stimulating artistic environment and gain introductions to leading figures in the art world. For those artists who chose England, London’s arts clubs played a large role, for it was in these establishments that they discussed, exhibited, shared, and met with their English counterparts. The club environment in London would have a significant impact on male Australian artists, as it offered a space where they were integrated into the English art world, which enhanced their experience whilst abroad.Artists were seldom members of Australia’s early gentlemen’s clubs, however, in the late nineteenth century Melbourne, artists formed less formal social groupings with exotic names such as the Prehistoric Order of Cannibals, the Buonarotti Club, and the Ishmael Club (Mead). Melbourne artists congregated in these clubs until the Melbourne Savage Club, modelled on the London Savage Club (1857)—a club whose membership was restricted to practitioners in the performing and visual arts—opened its doors in 1894.The Melbourne Savage Club had its origins in the Metropolitan Music Club, established in the late 1880s by a group of professional and amateur musicians and music lovers. The club initially admitted musicians and people from the dramatic professions free-of-charge, however, author Randolph Bedford (1868–1941) and artist Alf Vincent (1874–1915) were not content to be treated on a different basis to the musicians and actors, and two months after Vincent joined the club, at a Special General Meeting, the club resolved to vary Rule 6, “to admit landscape or portrait painters and sculptors without entrance fee” (Melbourne Savage Club). At another Special General Meeting, a year later, the rule was altered to admit “recognised members of the musical, dramatic and artistic professions and sculptors without payment of entrance fee” (Melbourne Savage Club).This resulted in an immediate influx of prominent Victorian male artists (Williams) and the Melbourne Savage Club became their place of choice to gather and enjoy the fellowship the club offered and to share ideas in a convivial atmosphere. When the opportunity arose for them to travel to London in the early twentieth century, they met in London’s famous art clubs. Membership of the Melbourne Savage Club not only conferred rights to visit reciprocal clubs whilst in London, but also facilitated introductions to potential patrons. The London clubs were the venue of choice for visiting artists to meet their fellow artist expatriates and to share experiences and, importantly, to meet with their British counterparts, exhibit their works, and establish valuable contacts.The London Savage Club attracted many Australian expatriates. Not only is it the grandfather of London’s bohemian clubs but also it was the model for arts clubs the world over. Founded in 1857, the qualification for admission was (and still is) to be, “a working man in literature or art, and a good fellow” (Halliday vii). If a candidate met these requirements, he would be cordially received “come whence he may.” This was embodied in the club’s first rules which required applicants for membership to be from a restricted range of pursuits relating to the arts thought to be commensurate with its bohemian ideals, namely art, literature, drama, or music.The second London arts club that attracted expatriate Australian artists was the New English Arts Club, founded in 1886 by young English artists returning from studying art in Paris. Members of The New English Arts Club were influenced by the Impressionist style as opposed to the academic art shown at the Royal Academy. As a meeting place for Australia’s expatriate artists, the New English Arts Club had a particular influence, as it exposed them to significant early Modern artist members such as John Singer Sargent (1856–1925), Walter Sickert (1860–1942), William Orpen (1878–1931) and Augustus John (1878–1961) (Corbett and Perry; Thornton; Melbourne Savage Club).The third, and arguably the most popular with the expatriate Australian artists’ club, was the Chelsea Arts Club, a bohemian club formed in 1891 by local working artists looking for a place to go to “meet, talk, eat and drink” (Cross).Apart from the American-born founding member, James McNeill Whistler (1834–1903), amongst the biggest Chelsea names at the time of the influx of travelling young Australian artists were modernists Sir William Orpen, Augustus John, and John Sargent. The opportunity to mix with these leading British contemporary artists was irresistible to these antipodean artists (55).When Melbourne artist, Miles Evergood (1871–1939) arrived in London from America in 1910, he had been an active exhibiting member of the Salmagundi Club, a New York artists’ club. Almost immediately he joined the New English Arts Club and the Chelsea Arts Club. Hammer tells of him associating with “writer Israel Zangwill, sculptor Jacob Epstein, and anti-academic artists including Walter Sickert, Augustus John, John Lavery, John Singer Sargent and C.R.W. Nevison, who challenged art values in Britain at the beginning of the century” (Hammer 41).Arthur Streeton (1867–1943) used the Chelsea Arts Club as his postal address, as did many expatriate artists. The Melbourne Savage Club archives contain letters and greetings, with news from abroad, written from artist members back to their “Brother Savages” (Various).In late 1902, Streeton wrote to fellow artist and Savage Club member Tom Roberts (1856–1931) from London:I belong to the Chelsea Arts Club now, & meet the artists – MacKennel says it’s about the most artistic club (speaking in the real sense) in England. … They all seem to be here – McKennal, Longstaff, Mahony, Fullwood, Norman, Minns, Fox, Plataganet Tudor St. George Tucker, Quinn, Coates, Bunny, Alston, K, Sonny Pole, other minor lights and your old friend and admirer Smike – within 100 yards of here – there must be 30 different studios. (Streeton 94)Whilst some of the artists whom Streeton mentioned were studying at either the Royal Academy or the Slade School, it was the clubs like the Chelsea Arts Club where they were most likely to encounter fellow Australian artists. Tom Roberts was obviously attentive to Streeton’s enthusiastic account and, when he returned to London the following year to work on his commission for The Big Picture of the 1901 opening of the first Commonwealth Parliament, he soon joined. Roberts, through his expansive personality, became particularly active in London’s Australian expatriate artistic community and later became Vice-President of the Chelsea Arts Club. Along with Streeton and Roberts, other visiting Melbourne Savage Club artists joined the Chelsea Arts Club. They included, John Longstaff (1861–1941), James Quinn (1869–1951), George Coates (1869–1930), and Will Dyson (1880–1938), along with Sydney artists Henry Fullwood (1863–1930), George Lambert (1873–1930), and Will Ashton (1881–1963) (Croll 95). Smith describes the exodus to London and Paris: “It was the Chelsea Arts Club that the Heidelberg School established its last and least distinguished camp” (Smith, Smith and Heathcote 152).Streeton, who retained his Chelsea Arts Club membership when he returned for a while to Australia, wrote to Roberts in 1907, “I miss Chelsea & the Club-boys” (Streeton 107). In relation to Frederick McCubbin’s pending visit he wrote: “Prof McCubbin left here a week ago by German ‘Prinz Heinrich.’ … You’ll introduce him at the Chelsea Club and I hope they make him an Hon. Member, etc” (Streeton et al. 85). McCubbin wrote, after an evening at the Chelsea Arts Club, following a visit to the Royal Academy: “Tonight, I am dining with Australian artists in Soho, and shall be there to greet my old friends. How glad I am! Longstaff will be there, and Frank Stuart, Roberts, Fullwood, Pontin, Coates, Quinn, and Tucker’s brother, and many others from all around” (MacDonald, McCubbin and McCubbin 75). Impressed by the work of Turner he wrote to his wife Annie, following avisit to the Tate Gallery:I went yesterday with Fullwood and G. Coates and Tom Roberts for a ramble … to the Tate Gallery – a beautiful freestone building facing the river through a portico into the gallery where the lately found turners are exhibited – these are not like the greater number of pictures in the National Gallery – they represent his different periods, but are mostly in his latest style, when he had realised the quality of light (McCubbin).Clearly Turner’s paintings had a profound impression on him. In the same letter he wrote:they are mostly unfinished but they are divine – such dreams of colour – a dozen of them are like pearls … mist and cloud and sea and land, drenched in light … They glow with tender brilliancy that radiates from these canvases – how he loved the dazzling brilliancy of morning or evening – these gems with their opal colour – you feel how he gloried in these tender visions of light and air. He worked from darkness into light.The Chelsea Arts Club also served as a venue for artists to entertain and host distinguished visitors from home. These guests included; Melbourne Savage Club artist member Alf Vincent (Joske 112), National Gallery of Victoria (NGV) Trustee and popular patron of the arts, Professor Baldwin Spencer (1860–1929), Professor Frederick S. Delmer (1864–1931) and conductor George Marshall-Hall (1862–1915) (Mulvaney and Calaby 329; Streeton 111).Artist Miles Evergood arrived in London in 1910, and visited the Chelsea Arts Club. He mentions expatriate Australian artists gathering at the Club, including Will Dyson, Fred Leist (1873–1945), David Davies (1864–1939), Will Ashton (1881–1963), and Henry Fullwood (Hammer 41).Most of the Melbourne Savage Club artist members were active in the London Savage Club. On one occasion, in November 1908, Roberts, with fellow artist MacKennal in the Chair, attended the Australian Artists’ Dinner held there. This event attracted twenty-five expatriate Australian artists, all residing in London at the time (McQueen 532).These London arts clubs had a significant influence on the expatriate Australian artists for they became the “glue” that held them together whilst abroad. Although some artists travelled abroad specifically to take up places at the Royal Academy School or the Slade School, only a minority of artists arriving in London from Australia and other British colonies were offered positions at these prestigious schools. Many artists travelled to “try their luck.” The arts clubs of London, whilst similarly discerning in their membership criteria, generally offered a visiting “brother-of-the-brush” a warm welcome as a professional courtesy. They featured the familiar rollicking all-male “Smoke Nights” a feature of the Melbourne Savage Club. With a greater “artist” membership than the clubs in Australia, expatriate artists were not only able to catch up with their friends from Australia, but also they could associate with England’s finest and most progressive artists in a familiar congenial environment. The clubs were a “home away from home” and described by Underhill as, “an artistic Earl’s Court” (Underhill 99). Most importantly, the clubs were a centre for discourse, arguably even more so than were the teaching academies. Britain’s leading modernist artists were members of the Chelsea Arts Club and the New English Arts Club and mixed freely with the visiting Australian artists.Many Australian artists, such as Miles Evergood and George Bell (1878–1966), held anti-academic views similar to English club members and embraced the new artistic trends, which they would bring back to Australia. Streeton had no illusions about the relative worth of the famed institutions and the exhibitions held by clubs such as the New English. Writing to Roberts before he joins him in London, he describes the Royal Academy as having, “an inartistic atmosphere” and claims he “hasn’t the least desire to go again” (Streeton 77). His preference lay with a concurrent “International Exhibition”, which featured works by Rodin, Whistler, Condor, Degas, and others who were setting the pace rather than merely continuing the academic traditions.Architect Hardy Wilson (1881–1955) served as secretary of The Chelsea Arts Club. When he returned to Australia he brought back with him a number of British works by Streeton and Lambert for an exhibition at the Guild Hall Melbourne (Underhill 92). Artists and Bohemians, a history of the Chelsea Arts Club, makes special reference of its world-wide contacts and singles out many of its prominent Australian members for specific mention including; Sir John William (Will) Ashton OBE, later Director of the Art Gallery of New South Wales, and Will Dyson, whose illustrious career as an Australian war artist was described in some detail. Dyson’s popularity led to his later appointment as Chairman of the Chelsea Arts Club where he initiated an ambitious rebuilding program, improving staff accommodation, refurbishing the members’ areas, and adding five bedrooms for visiting members (Bross 87-90).Whilst the influence of travel abroad on Australian artists has been noted, the importance of the London Clubs has not been fully explored. These clubs offered artists a space where they felt “at home” and a familiar environment whilst they were abroad. The clubs functioned as a meeting space where they could engage in a stimulating artistic environment and gain introductions to leading figures in the art world. For those artists who chose England, London’s arts clubs played a large role, for it was in these establishments that they discussed, exhibited, shared, and met with their English counterparts. The club environment in London had a significant impact on male Australian artists as it offered a space where they were integrated into the English art world which enhanced their experience whilst abroad and influenced the direction of their art.ReferencesCorbett, David Peters, and Lara Perry, eds. English Art, 1860–1914: Modern Artists and Identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Croll, Robert Henderson. Tom Roberts: Father of Australian Landscape Painting. Melbourne: Robertson & Mullens, 1935.Cross, Tom. Artists and Bohemians: 100 Years with the Chelsea Arts Club. 1992. 1st ed. London: Quiller Press, 1992.Gray, Anne, and National Gallery of Australia. McCubbin: Last Impressions 1907–17. 1st ed. Parkes, A.C.T.: National Gallery of Australia, 2009.Halliday, Andrew, ed. The Savage Papers. 1867. 1st ed. London: Tinsley Brothers, 1867.Hammer, Gael. Miles Evergood: No End of Passion. Willoughby, NSW: Phillip Mathews, 2013.Joske, Prue. Debonair Jack: A Biography of Sir John Longstaff. 1st ed. Melbourne: Claremont Publishing, 1994.MacDonald, James S., Frederick McCubbin, and Alexander McCubbin. The Art of F. McCubbin. Melbourne: Lothian Book Publishing, 1916.McCaughy, Patrick. Strange Country: Why Australian Painting Matters. Ed. Paige Amor. The Miegunyah Press, 2014.McCubbin, Frederick. Papers, Ca. 1900–Ca. 1915. Melbourne.McQueen, Humphrey. Tom Roberts. Sydney: Macmillan, 1996.Mead, Stephen. "Bohemia in Melbourne: An Investigation of the Writer Marcus Clarke and Four Artistic Clubs during the Late 1860s – 1901.” PhD thesis. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 2009.Melbourne Savage Club. Secretary. Minute Book: Melbourne Savage Club. Club Minutes (General Committee). Melbourne: Savage Archives.Mulvaney, Derek John, and J.H. Calaby. So Much That Is New: Baldwin Spencer, 1860–1929, a Biography. Carlton, Vic.: Melbourne University Press, 1985.Smith, Bernard, Terry Smith, and Christopher Heathcote. Australian Painting, 1788–2000. 4th ed. South Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press, 2001.Streeton, Arthur, et al. Smike to Bulldog: Letters from Sir Arthur Streeton to Tom Roberts. Sydney: Ure Smith, 1946.Streeton, Arthur, ed. Letters from Smike: The Letters of Arthur Streeton, 1890–1943. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1989.Thornton, Alfred, and New English Art Club. Fifty Years of the New English Art Club, 1886–1935. London: New English Art Club, Curwen Press 1935.Underhill, Nancy D.H. Making Australian Art 1916–49: Sydney Ure Smith Patron and Publisher. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1991.Various. Melbourne Savage Club Correspondence Book: 1902–1916. Melbourne: Melbourne Savage Club.Williams, Graeme Henry. "A Socio-Cultural Reading: The Melbourne Savage Club through Its Collections." Masters of Arts thesis. Melbourne: Deakin University, 2013.