Academic literature on the topic '1831-1920'

The genus Prionocerus Perty, 1831 is revised. Eight species are recognised: P. coeruleipennis Perty, 1831 (= P. coeruleipennis var. diversicollis Pic, 1920, n. syn.); P. bicolor Redtenbacher, 1868 (= P. pertii Castelnau, 1836, n. syn.); P. opacipennis (Pic, 1920) (transferred from Idgia Castelnau, 1836); P. viridiflavus Geiser, 2007 and four new species: P. paiensis n. sp. (Thailand); P. malaysiacus n. sp. (Malaysia); P. championi n. sp. (Indonesia) and P. wittmeri n. sp. (Indonesia). All previous synonymies of taxa under P. coeruleipennis and P. bicolor could be confirmed through study of the relevant types. Prionocerus pertii Castelnau, 1836 was found to be conspecific with P. bicolor Redtenbacher, 1868, but this senior synonymy was submitted to the ICZN proposing it as nomen oblitum. Prionocerus thibetanus Obenberger, 1918 is newly synonymised with Idgia viridescens Gorham, 1895. Prionocerus huegeli Redtenbacher, 1868 and P. hirtus Walker, 1871 are confirmed to belong to Idgia, the latter has to be treated as a nomen dubium. The infrageneric phylogeny of Prionocerus, its relationships to other Prionoceridae, as well as its life history, ecology and biogeography are discussed.

Este trabajo de investigación nace con motivo del 150 aniversario del nacimiento del canónigo doctor Juan Francisco Muñoz y Pabón (1866-1920), seminarista (1878-1893) y posteriormente profesor (1887-1920). Ofrecemos una visión general del seminario conciliar de san Isidoro y san Francisco Javier de Sevilla desde su erección en 1831 en Sanlúcar de Barrameda hasta la creación de la universidad pontificia en 1897. La vida cotidiana —estudios y religiosidad— está muy presente en este artículo. La parte central del mismo está dedicada a nuestro biografiado Muñoz y Pabón: seminarista, sacerdote, profesor y canónigo. Este trabajo finaliza con dos apéndices: el primero sobre el claustro de profesores del seminario (1878-1920) y el segundo sobre el colegio de doctores de la facultad de teología de la universidad pontificia de Sevilla (1897-1931).

ZUSAMMENFASSUNGKognitive Einschränkungen sind bei etwa jedem fünften Kind mit einer Epilepsie vorhanden. Ein besonders hohes Risiko besteht bei früher Epilepsiemanifestation. Die Ursache der Epilepsie beeinflusst neben anderen Faktoren das Ausmaß der kognitiven Einschränkungen am stärksten. Die Erkennung von kognitiven Einschränkungen bei Kindern mit Epilepsie kann Auswirkungen auf entsprechende Förderkonzepte und Lebenswege für die betroffenen Kinder haben. Ferner muss erkannt werden, ob die medikamentöse Behandlung der Anfälle zu einer eingeschränkten kognitiven Leistungsfähigkeit beiträgt. In einigen Fällen können frühzeitige epilepsiechirurgische Eingriffe, sofern der Patient dafür infrage kommt, einen kognitiven Abbau aufhalten.

AbstractAll species-group names of Trachypachidae, Rhysodidae, and Carabidae (including cicindelincs) correctly recorded from America north of Mexico are catalogued with state and province records. Valid names are listed with the author(s), date of publication, and page citation in their current and original combinations while all synonyms are provided in their original combinations. Genus-group names are recorded with the author(s), date of publication, page citation, type species, and kind of type species fixation. Species groups were preferred to subgenera but subscneric names are also listed.The following nomenclatural changes are proposed and discussed: Bembidion neocoerulescens Bousquet, new replacement name for B. coerulescens Van Dyke, 1925; Chlaenius circumcinctus Say, 1830 for C. perplexus Dejean, 1831; Cyclotrachelus dejeanellus (Csiki, 1930) for C. morio (Dejean, 1828); Cyclotrachelus freitagi Bousquet, new replacement name for C. obsoletus (Say, 1830); Dyschirius aeneolus LeConte, 1850 for D. frigidus Mannerheim, 1853; Harpalus laevipes Zetterstedt, 1828 for H. quadripunctatus Dejean, 1829; Harpalus providens Casey, 1914 for H. viduus LeConte, 1865; Harpalus reversus Casey, 1924 for H. funerarius Csiki, 1932; Notiophilus sierranus Casey, 1920 for N. obscurus Fall, 1901; Pseudamara Lindroth, 1968 for Disamara Lindroth, 1976; Pterostichus trinarius (Casey, 1918) for P. ohionis Csiki, 1930; Stenolophus carbo Bousquet, new replacement name for S. carbonarius (Dejean, 1829).Thirty-six new synonyms are established and seven, considered as questionable, are confirmed. They are (with the valid names in parentheses): Agonothorax planipennis Motschulsky, 1850 (= ? Agonum affine Kirby, 1837); Platynus variolatus LeConte, 1851 (= Agonum limbatum Motschulsky, 1845); Agonum nitidum Harris, 1869 (= ? Agonum melanarium Dejean, 1828); Amerinus fuscicornis Casey, 1914 and A. longipennis Casey, 1914 (= Amerinus linearis (LeConte, 1863)); Apristus fuscipennis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Apristus latens LeConte, 1848); Batenus aeneolus Motschulsky, 1865 (= Agonum exaratum (Mannerheim, 1853)); Brachystylus curtipennis Motschulsky, 1859 (= Pterostichus congestus (Ménétriés, 1843)); Brachystylus parallelus Motschulsky, 1859 (= ? Pterostichus californicus (Dejean, 1828)); Cratacanthus cephalotes Casey, 1914, C. subovalis Casey, 1914, and C. texanus Casey, 1884 (= Cratacanthus dubius (Palisot de Beauvois, 1811)); Cymindis comma T.W. Harris, 1869 (= ? Cymindis limbatus Dejean, 1831); Feronia praetermissa Chaudoir, 1868 (= Pterostichus commutabilis (Motschulsky, 1866)); Galerita angusticeps Casey, 1920 (= Galerita janus (Fabricius, 1792)); Gonoderus cordicollis Motschulsky 1859 (= Pterostichus tristis (Dejean, 1828)); Anisodactylus alternans LeConte, 1851 (= Anisodactylus alternans (Motschulsky, 1845)); Hypherpes spissitarsis Casey, 1918 (= Pterostichus tarsalis LeConte, 1873); Lebia brunnicollis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Lebia lobulata LeConte, 1863); Lebia subfigurata Motschulsky, 1864 and L. sublimbata Motschulsky, 1864 (= Lebia analis Dejean, 1825); Lophoglossus bispiculatus Casey, 1913 and L. illini Casey, 1913 (= Lophoglossus scrutator (LeConte, 1848)); Platysma leconteianum Lutshnik, 1922 (= Pterostichus commutabilis (Motschulsky, 1866)); Loxandrus iris Motschulsky, 1866(= Loxandrus rectus (Say, 1823)); Masoreus americanus Motschulsky, 1864 (= Stenolophus rotundicollis (Haldeman, 1843)); Notaphus laterimaculatus Motschulsky, 1859 (= Bembidion approximatum (LeConte, 1852)); Notiophilus cribrilaterus Motschulsky, 1864 (= Notiophilus novemstriatus LeConte, 1848); Omaseus brevibasis Casey, 1924 (= Pterostichus luctuosus (Dejean, 1828)); Notaphus incertus Motschulsky, 1845 (= Bembidion breve (Motschulsky, 1845)); Peryphus concolor Motschulsky, 1850 (= Bembidion platynoides Hayward, 1897); Peryphus erosus Motschulsky, 1850 (= Bembidion transversale Dejean, 1831); Peryphus subinflatus Motschulsky, 1859 (= Bembidion petrosum petrosum Gebler, 1833); Planesus fuscicollis Motschulsky, 1865 and P. laevigatas Motschulsky, 1865 (= Cymindis platicollis (Say, 1823)); Poecilus pimalis Casey, 1913 (= Poecilus diplophryus Chaudoir, 1876); Pterostichus arizonicus Schaeffer, 1910 (= Ophryogaster flohri Bates, 1882); Pterostichus sequoiarum Casey, 1913 (= Pterostichus tarsalis LeConte, 1873); Scaphinotus grandis Gistel, 1857 (= ? Scaphinotus unicolor unicolor (Fabricius, 1787)); Stenocrepis chalcas Bates, 1882 and S. chalcochrous Chaudoir, 1883 (= Stenocrepis texana (LeConte, 1863)); Stenolophus humeralis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Stenolophus plebejus Dejean, 1829); and Stenolophus laticollis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Stenolophus ochropezus (Say, 1823)).Olisthopus iterans Casey, 1913 and Pterostichus illustris LeConte, 1851, listed as junior synonyms of O. parmatus (Say, 1823) and P. congestus (Ménétriés, 1843), respectively, are considered in the present work as valid species.The type species (listed in parentheses) of the following 14 genus-group taxa are designated for the first time: Circinalidia Casey, 1920 (Agonum aeruginosum Dejean, 1828); Evolenes LeConte, 1853 (Oodes exaratus Dejean, 1831); Leucagonum Casey, 1920 (Agonum maculicolle Dejean, 1828); Megaliridia Casey, 1920 (Cychrus viduus Dejean, 1826); Megalostylus Chaudoir, 1843 (Feronia lucidula Dejean, 1828 = Feronia recta Say, 1823); Micragra Chaudoir, 1872 (Micragra lissonota Chaudoir, 1872); Onota Chaudoir, 1872 (Onota bicolor Chaudoir, 1872); Oodiellus Chaudoir, 1882 (Oodiellus mexicanus Chaudoir, 1882 = Anatrichis alutacea Bates, 1882); Oxydrepanus Putzeys, 1866 (Dyschirius rufus Putzeys, 1846); Paranchomenus Casey, 1920 (Platynus stygicus LeConte, 1854 = Anchomenus mannerheimii Dejean, 1828); Pemphus Motschulsky, 1866 (Cychrus velutinus Ménétriés, 1843); Peronoscelis Chaudoir, 1872 (Tetragonoderus figuratus Dejean, 1831); Rhombodera Reiche, 1842 (Rhombodera virgata Reiche, 1842 = Lebia trivittata Dejean, 1831); and Stenous Chaudoir, 1857 (Oodes cupreus Chaudoir, 1843).Two new family-group names are proposed, Cnemalobini (= Cnemacanthini of authors) based on Cnemalobus Guérin-Méneville, 1839 and Loxandrini based on Loxandrus LeConte, 1852.The work also includes a synopsis of all extant world carabid tribes, a bibliography of all original descriptions, a full taxonomic index, and, as appendices, lists of nomina nuda and unjustified emendations, and annotated lists of species incorrectly or doubtfully recorded from America north of Mexico and of new North American records.

The circum-Antarctic clam Laternula elliptica (King & Broderip 1831) is the largest infaunal bivalve of the Southern Ocean. It mostly lives in water depths of less than 100 m (highest densities from 20–30 m; e.g. Ahn 1994), in soft or semi-consolidated substrates from sandy mud to gravelly sand (Soot-Ryen 1951, Nicol 1966). Animals are deep-burrowing (to >0.5 m; Zamorano et al. 1986) and consequently have large siphons. These are fused, highly muscular and covered by thick, rugose periostracum, and are capable of partial retraction only (Burne 1920). The ecology of L. elliptica was likened by Ralph & Maxwell (1977) to that of Mya arenaria L. in northern temperate and Arctic waters.

The genus Notiophilus Duméril, 1806 is a distinctive taxon of small, diurnal and morphologically similar beetles exhibiting large eyes and widened second elytral intervals. In this study we analysed the effectiveness of DNA barcodes to discriminate 67 specimens that represent 8 species of Notiophilus from Central Europe. Interspecific K2P distances below 2.2% were found for N.biguttatus (Fabricius, 1779) and N.quadripunctatus Dejean, 1826, whereas intraspecific distances with values > 2.2% were revealed for N.rufipes Curtis, 1829. An additional phylogenetic analysis of all available species revealed a close relationship of N.directus Casey, 1920, N.semistriatus Say, 1823, N.simulator Fall, 1906 and N.sylvaticus Dejean, 1831, possibly indicating a radiation of these species in North America. Low support values of most other nodes, however, do not allow additional phylogenetic conclusions.

This article describes the foundation of the Ichan-Kala State Museum Reserve in Khiva in 1920 and the activities of the museum, its staff, exhibitions and events over the past 100 years. The Khiva museum- was opened on April 27, 1920 in Arzkhana (reception hall) of Kunya-Ark in the presence of the participants of the 1st Kurultay (Congress) of national representatives. It was called the People’s Museum. The number of visitors increased day by day. In addition to the exposition itself, introductory lectures were held there and thematic exhibitions were organized on certain dates. Until 1924, the descendants of Allakuli Khan lived in the huge Tash-Khauli palace built in 1831–1839 in the inner fortress of Khiva. Considering it their own possession, they began to sell the property of the palace. The government members, having learnt about this, moved the Khiva museum from Kunya-Ark to Tash-Khauli and included it in the list of state property.13 In August of the same year, the Khiva Museum was supplied with the necessary exhibition equipment delivered from Moscow. 285 unique pieces were exhibited in the imported showcases.

A letter home: from Grundtvig in Cambridge to his wife Lise, June 183 [Et brev hjem fra Grundtvig i Cambridge til sin hustru Lise, juni 1831]Af S. A. J. BradleyDet har længe været en ortodoksi i grundtvigforskeres opfattelse, at Grs mission med at studere angelsaksiske håndskrifter under Englandsrejserne 1829-1831 blev fortrængt af hans reaktion ved mødet med det samtidige England. Men inden for grundtvigforskningen har man - med nogle få fremtrædende undtagelser - i nogen grad overset den angelsaksiske kulturelle arv, som Gr blev optaget af, da han i 1815 i forbindelse med sin fortolkning af Beowulf lærte sig at læse angelsaksisk. En mere omfattende forståelse af, hvad Gr stiftede bekendtskab med i mødet med disse håndskrifter - og med tidligere forskeres udgaver af de angelsaksiske tekster - kan således komme til at medføre en revurdering i den vanlige redegørelse af Grs intellektuelle og åndelige udvikling i perioden, der kulminerede med udgivelsen af Nordens Mythologi (1832). Ganske vist viser Grs breve fra England hans skarpe iagttagelse af englændernes livsform, deres institutioner og samfundsforhold; men brevene dokumenterer og bekræfter samtidig hans vedblivende interesse for håndskriftarven fra Nordens tidligste kristelige kultur.Her vises i engelsk oversættelse et brev afsendt af Gr i juni 1831 fra Cambridge til hjemmet. Det er et uddrag fra en brevantologi (oversat ved Helene Felter og S. A. J. Bradley; delvis baseret på N. F. S. Grundtvigs Breve til hans Hustru under Englandsrejseme 1829-1831. Udgivne af deres Børnebørn, København 1920), der er under udarbejdelse af the English Translation Project, Center for Grundtvig Studier, Århus Universitet. Formålet med dette projekt er at gøre Grs forfatterskab mere tilgængeligt i den engelsktalende verden. De mest betydningsfulde værker vil blive udgivet i engelsk oversættelse. Projektets første fase er treårig og ledes af Jens Holger Schjørring (Århus Universitet) og S. A. J. Bradley (University of York) i samarbejde med Kim Ame Pedersen (Århus Universitet) og A. M. Allchin (University of Bangor). Første bind, der forventes udgivet af Århus Universitetsforlag i september 2003, bliver en kommenteret antologi af Grs erindringer og erindringer om Gr. Senere kommer flere bind, som illustrerer Grs engagement i Beowulf og Nordens mytologi, hans skrifter om skole og skolevæsen, og en række udvalgte salmer og prædikener.Brevet fra Cambridge omhandler primært de venskaber, Gr etablerede blandt den »lille Kreds af kyndige, venlige, christelig tænkende Præster og Professorer, hos hvem jeg gaaer ind og ud« og hans store glæde over den adgang, han fik til Universitets fremragende angelsaksiske håndskriftsamlinger.

De Hegel a max weber, en passant par l'école historique allemande (Ranke, Droysen, Treitschke) : cette recherche s'attache à décrire le procès par lequel une science positive, la sociologie, a repris à son compte l'entreprise de connaissance de la réalité socio-politique jadis menée par la philosophie pratique. Refusant de prendre parti dans la polémique entre théoriciens des sciences positives et philosophes, c'est-à-dire d'interpréter ce procès soit comme une émancipation des sciences, soit comme une dégénérescence, on s'est applique à confronter les économies respectives des deux discours, et l'on s'est interrogé sur la nécessite qui avait commandé ce repli de la philosophie politique, et l'essor corrélatif des sciences sociales. La philosophie du droit de Hegel et la sociologie wébérienne, aujourd'hui encore des références fondamentales dans leurs disciplines respectives, illustrent ici l'approche philosophique et l'approche sociologique du politique. Entre ces deux œuvres, la critique de la spéculation philosophique par les historiens d'une part, le marxisme d'autre part, ont provoqué un bouleversement en profondeur de la représentation de l'histoire. L'idée d'un sens de l'histoire s'est perdue, et avec elle le concept philosophique de la rationalité des pratiques. L'empirisme de la sociologie wébérienne, auquel peuvent être rapportes tous les aspects caractéristiques de sa méthodologie, enregistre les effets de cette mutation.

John Forbes White's contribution to the history of Art in Scotland was, for the first seventy years after his death, mentioned only in passing by the main writers on Scottish art of the day. However, two of his daughters, Ina Mary Harrower and Dorothea Fyfe, both wrote articles on aspects of their father's collecting: Ina publishing "Private Picture Galleries, The Collection of John Forbes White" in Goodwords in 1896 (pp 813-819), John Forbes White (Edinburgh) in 1918 and in 1927, "Jozef lsraels and his Aberdeen Friend" for the Aberdeen University Review (pp 108-122). A noted art historian, Ina reflected her father's taste and collecting interests in her own writings, as with, for example, "Studies of Fruit by Courbet" Apollo (Vol. L No 296 1949 pp 95-98). Dorothea, with her co-author C.S. Minto, published John Forbes White, Miller, Collector, Photographer 1831-1904 (Edinburgh 1970). The only other writers who have examined White's contribution to art in any detail were Charles Carter, who as curator of Aberdeen Art Gallery, covered art and patronage in the North-East of Scotland in numerous articles and outlined White's contribution in "Art Patronage in Scotland: John Forbes White" published in the Scottish Art Review,(Vol VI, no 2, 1957, pp. 27-30). Frances Fowle, on completion of her PhD on Alexander Reid, also discussed White's tastes in "The Hague School and the Scots, A Taste for Dutch Pictures" (Apollo August 1991 pp 108-111). George Reid was still less favoured by critics after his death. With J.L. Caw championing James Guthrie and William MacTaggart, the innovative and influential aspects of Reid's art were obscured, reduced and even sometimes credited to others. W.D. McKay in The Scottish School of Painting (London 1906) had played down Reid's part in the introduction of Realism into Scotland and Agnes McKay in her monograph on Arthur Melville (Lee on Sea, 1951) went furthest of all in portraying Reid as the enemy of a younger, more innovative group of artists, who included the subject of her book. It was to be another thirty years before Dun can Macmillan would examine Reid, in Scottish Art 1460-1990 (Mainstream, 1990) as an important landscape painter, rather than, as had been the case before, as a reactionary president of the Royal Scottish Academy and an extremely dull, if talented, portrait painter. One year later John Morrison, having completed his PhD Rural Nostalgia: Painting in XIX Scotland c.1860-1880 (St Andrews 1989) wrote of Reid's important European contacts and of the vital relationship between White and Reid in "Sir George Reid in Holland, his work with G.A. Mollinger and Jozef Israels" (Jong Holland 1991 No 4 pp 10-19). Both the assets and the faults of Alexander Macdonald's collecting were examined by Charles Carter in "Alexander Macdonald 1837-1884 - Aberdeen Art Collector" (Scottish Art Review, Vol V, no 3, 1955, pp. 23-28) and again by Francina Irwin in an exhibition catalogue entitled Alexander Macdonald: From Mason to Maecenas in 1985. My main source of material has come from the uncatalogued archive of correspondence between George Reid, John Forbes White, Jozef Israels, George Paul Chalmers, David Artz, Gerrit Mollinger, Samuel Smiles and others, most of which is housed in Aberdeen Art Gallery. Reid's unpublished autobiography, transcribed by his wife Mia, (in the same archive) was also of great use, as was an unpublished but almost complete catalogue raisonne of Reid's work, compiled, probably by Percy Bate or Harry Townend c.1912. I have also made extensive use of the papers of James Pittendrigh Macgillivray which are held by The National Library of Scotland. The descendants of John Forbes White made the works and letters in their possession freely available to me. These included the correspondence between John Forbes White and William Stott of Oldham which is cited in Chapter 6. Elements of this thesis, and particularly sections 2,3, & 4 of Chapter 4, appeared in a revised form in "Art and Patronage in Aberdeen 1860-1920", a paper that I delivered at the Scottish Society of Art History's conference on Patronage, and which was published in The Journal of the Scottish Society for Art Historians (Volume 3 1998 pp 16-24). The sixth section of Chapter 5 appeared in a revised form, in An Album of Photographs compiled by Sir John Everett Millais PRA published in Studies in Photography (Edinburgh, 1997). The discussion of the influence of Ancient Greece and Classicism in the eighth section of Chapter 7 was included in a paper entitled John Forbes White, The Classical Tradition and Ideals In Art given at the conference on "The Role of Collections In The Scottish Cultural Tradition", which was held at Aberdeen University in 1998. The third section of Chapter 7 appeared in a revised form in Robert Brough (Aberdeen Art Gallery, 1995). Appendix A contains relevant excerpts from letters and text, on which much of my research was based whilst Appendix B lists the works of art owned by John Forbes White.

À la suite d'Agrippa, maint sceptique a argué de la pluralité des systèmes pour ruiner toute ambition de vérité philosophique : des systèmes contradictoires ne pouvant être vrais simultanément, leurs prétentions respectives s'annulent. L'argument n'a pourtant de valeur que si la pluralité des systèmes est elle-même irrationnelle. Or plusieurs philosophes ont rationalisé la diversité des systèmes philosophiques, suggérant par là que la raison puisse s'approprier sa propre limite ; notamment Kant, dans l'" Histoire de la raison pure " qui conclut la Critique de la raison pure (1781) ; Hegel, dans les Leçons sur l'histoire de la philosophie (1805-1830) ; Victor Cousin, dans Du Vrai, du beau et du bien (1828) et l'Histoire générale de la philosophie (1863) ; Charles Renouvier, dans l'Esquisse d'une classification systématique des doctrines philosophiques (1885-1886) ; et Jules Vuillemin, dans Nécessité ou contingence (1984).Étudier de manière interne chacune de ces entreprises permet de déterminer quels en sont les critères fondamentaux, la forme mathématique générale, et le but philosophique. L'histoire kantienne de la raison pure, injustement dédaignée, repose sur les concepts fondamentaux du criticisme, structure maint chapitre des trois Critiques, et annonce la paix philosophique perpétuelle dont est porteur le criticisme. Les Leçons de Hegel ne sont ni un résumé empirique ni une histoire biaisée de la philosophie : fondées sur la Logique et la Phénoménologie, elles mettent au jour la dialectique interne des systèmes. La classification de Renouvier n'est pas, comme on le dit parfois, a posteriori, mais repose au contraire sur le jeu a priori d'une table des catégories et d'une théorie de la contradiction. Enfin, la classification vuilleminienne des systèmes, qui s'appuie sur une classification des formes de prédication, généralise la classification kantienne. Seule la classification de Victor Cousin s'avère finalement a posteriori.Ancrées dans les concepts fondamentaux de chacune de ces doctrines, ces classifications montrent qu'un système peut construire l'image des autres et de leurs relations aussi rigoureusement qu'il décrit le monde : les relations entre systèmes ne sont pas moins structurales que les systèmes eux-mêmes.