Academic literature on the topic '1818-1883 contributions in political science'

The year 2003 marks the twentieth-fifth anniversary of the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) of 1978, a late chapter in the development of the American administrative state and the most significant reform of the civil service system since its creation through the Pendleton Act of 1883. The Act made a number of enduring contributions to the personnel system of the federal government. Given the recursive nature of public management debate, there is considerable policy importance in trying to understand the original basis of decisions on legislation that have shaped the federal government over the last twenty-five years, and the CSRA has recently been the subject of renewed interest. More important, the CSRA was a rare and relatively important shift in the beliefs and attitudes—the administrative doctrine—that shape the evolution of the administrative state. Significantly, the debate during the CSRA saw the emergence of deep divisions within administrative doctrine, divisions that continue to shape public management policymaking.

This paper investigates scientific, institutional, and political conflict and collaboration between two different disciplines in the first part of the 20th century: applied mathematics and fluid dynamics. It argues for the catalytic role of Richard von Mises (1883–1953) in this process and analyzes the reasons for von Mises’s considerable fame in the former and limited posthumous reputation in the latter field. I argue that von Mises’s contributions to fluid dynamics and aerodynamics suffered chiefly from two somewhat interconnected deficiencies compared to the work of his principal competitors. There was, on the one hand, von Mises’s methodological preference for applied mathematics as opposed to the reigning hybrid theories of fluid dynamics, which were usually more prone to ad hoc adaptation of theory to experimental data. There was, on the other hand, von Mises’s geographical remoteness from the main experimental facilities of fluid dynamics and the data produced there. Additionally, there were external reasons that limited von Mises’s influence, among them his fate as a refugee from Nazi Germany. Despite his occasionally polemical mind, von Mises’s work as a bridge builder prevailed, as evidenced by the success of his journal ZAMM. Indisputably, von Mises was a rare example of an engineer and a mathematician combined.

In lieu of an abstract, this is the article's first page: With classical orientalists, such as Frants Buhl (1850-1932) and Johannes Pedersen (1883-1977), and contemporary scholars like Jørgen Bæk Simonsen, Jørgen S. Nielsen and Jakob Skovgaard-Petersen, Denmark has a proud history when it comes to the study of religion, including Islam and the wider Muslim world (on Buhl, see Læssøe 1979; on Pedersen, see Løkkegaard 1982). Besides these scholars, it is also possible to find others in the fields of sociology, anthropology, political science and media studies who have made, and continue to make, strong contributions to the study of Islam and Muslims (cf. e.g. Tidsskrift for Islamforskning 7(1) 2013). Denmark has also produced a number of strong female scholars, such as Garbi Schmidt, Lene Kühle, Kate Østergaard, Nadia Jeldtoft, Birgitte Schepelern Johansen, Jytte Klausen and Catharina Raudvere (who is Swedish, but holds a professorship in the History of Religions at the University of Copenhagen). Hence it is evident that the study of Islam and Muslims is thriving in Denmark. That said, however, it is also apparent that the academic study of minority religions (not least Islam) is often perceived as a controversial topic. From this point of view Denmark is not unique: studying Islam and Muslims generally causes debate and sometimes even tension within both academia and the public sphere. One important instrument for countering simplistic and populist conclusions about (...)

The work of Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Max Weber (1864-1920) on the economy and society of the ancient world inaugurate a new perspective in relation to the economists of the 18th and 19th centuries and in debates about the old economy locked in Germany in the late 19th century. Different from neoclassical economists and the modernists and primitivism, these authors will defend the thesis of a radical break between the old world and the modern. A discontinuity marked, for Marx, the birth of the capitalist system, and for Weber, of modern capitalism. In addition to this similarity, these thinkers have reinforced the Eurocentric view by stating that the cultural and political roots of modern west lie in Classical Antiquity, reinforcing a tradition of thought of deep rifts between the ancient societies of the East and the societies of the Greco-Roman world, much contested in current historiography.

The work of Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Max Weber (1864-1920) on the economy and society of the ancient world inaugurate a new perspective in relation to the economists of the 18th and 19th centuries and in debates about the old economy locked in Germany in the late 19th century. Different from neoclassical economists and the modernists and primitivism, these authors will defend the thesis of a radical break between the old world and the modern. A discontinuity marked, for Marx, the birth of the capitalist system, and for Weber, of modern capitalism. In addition to this similarity, these thinkers have reinforced the Eurocentric view by stating that the cultural and political roots of modern west lie in Classical Antiquity, reinforcing a tradition of thought of deep rifts between the ancient societies of the East and the societies of the Greco-Roman world, much contested in current historiography.

What are the effects of populists in power on democracy during a pandemic? The paper seeks to distinguish the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic can (not) be traced to democratic erosion and democratic resilience. Are the changes in the quality of democracy resulting from political leaders' actions or rather a path-dependent continuation of previous trends? This contribution focuses on two paths – democratic erosion and democratic resilience – in the Visegrad Four countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia), which are all governed by populist leaders. It builds on previous literature that focused principally on the first wave of the pandemic by focusing on institutional guardrails and accountability (vertical, horizontal, and diagonal) during the 18 months of the pandemic. It seeks to answer the following question: What conditions are necessary and sufficient to prevent democratic erosion?

The attempt to found a museum in Geneva faced many challenges, but the nature of the city also provided some unusual opportunities. Against a background of the French Revolution, political upheaval, war and the creation of a new Swiss state, a few members of the academic and scientific community, led by Henri Boissier and Augustin-Pyramus de Candolle, created an institution in 1818 that was to become famous. Harnessing the patriotism of the population, the presence of eminent scientists, the interest of wealthy patrons, and local and international networks, they began to build a collection. The aim was to establish an educational resource, both for the formal teaching at the Académie de Genève and for public instruction. To attract the public, the donation of spectacular objects was of great help, and many individuals and institutions gave specimens in an early form of crowdsourcing. The academic ambitions required a more systematic effort and detailed collection data to augment the value of the specimens. To achieve this, the friendship and kinship networks of Geneva were brought into play; a comparison of the letters from the museum administration preserved by Léonard Revilliod (1786–1867) and entries in the museum's acquisition register provides a case study of how this interaction worked in practice.

Józefat Zielonacki - A Forgotten Polish Romanist of XIX C. An Outline of a BiographySummaryJ. Zielonacki was born on 28 November 1818 in a village called Goniczki, situated the Grand Duchy of Poznan, which belonged to his family.He spent his childhood in his family estate. After completing education in schools in Trzemeszno and Poznan he studied in Berlin, where he graduated in 1845 and conferred a doctor degree (dr) in both laws. In 1848 (or 1849) he was qualified as an assistant professor (dr hab) at Wroclaw University, where he subsequently lectured the Roman law.In 1850 Prof. Zielonacki succeeded to be a head of the Roman law department at the Jagiellonian University.At that time Galicia was in the period of absolutist reaction after the People’s Spring, distinguished by the suppression of civil liberties and a regime of terror. The declaration of a state of siege on 10.01.1849 led to handing over a full authority to Austrian generals, subsequent military commanders of the country, to whose authority - legitimately and in practice - (in these circumstances) the Galician governor - Agenor hr. Goluchowski was - submitted. The University was in practice deprived of its autonomy; all important matters were meticulously directed and supervised by the central authorities in Vienna. Appointments to professorships depended exclusively on the Austrian Ministry of Education, which also examined in detail ‘the political conformity’ of each candidate. Prof. Zielonacki was put up as a candidate by the minister Leon hr. Thun, who wrote in the application to the Emperor about a “great talent” but also “unblemished political attitude” of the candidate.J. Zielonacki lectured the Roman law in Cracow for two years and a half - until the end of December 1852. He was popular amongst the students and was respected amongst scholars as an eminent expert of the Roman law.On 1.01.1853 - without giving any justification, Prof. Zielonacki was removed from the University together with the following Professors: A. Malecki, W. Pol, A. Z. Helcel. The reasons for the dismissal have not been fully explained; at present it is considered as a revenge of the authorities for “the national attitude of the university full of dignity and visible efforts to maintain the Polish character” or even “acts of terror”. The direct reason for dismissing the “inconvenient” Professors was a denunciation against Prof. Malecki and Prof. Pol (and possibly Kremer), which drew the attention of the police to the whole academic environment. The head of the police in Cracow - Carol Neusser - who was commissioned to check the grounds of the denunciation, invigilated all university professors. It was claimed in his report (written on 21.03.1852) that some of the lecturers were particularly dangerous for the authorities. Prof. Zielonacki was described to be an impulsive person, having - “apart from Polish revolutionary tendencies, plenty of Prussian prejudices against Austria”, behaving “always unfriendly” towards the government. Thus, the removal of the professors had a clear political context - no particular accusations were however formulated. After the dismissal from the Jagiellonian University, Prof. Zielonacki was moved to Innsbruck, where he was the head of the Roman law department (until 1855), and afterwards he took over the same post at the Karol University in Prague.In 1857 Prof. Zielonacki, at his own request, was moved to the Lwow University, where he taught Roman law until he retired in 1870.In 1861 he tried to go back to Cracow to take over a vacant post in the Roman Law department but the authorities rejected his candidacy.Prof. Zielonacki made major contributions to the polonization of the Lwow University - he was the first and - for a long time - the only professor lecturing in Polish. In intense disputes with German professors he managed to win the right to use the Polish legal terminology during the lectures, subsequently a right for lectures in Polish, and afterwards to use Polish during exams. Fighting for the polonization of the university had an impact on his professorship career - after he was elected to be the dean of the Law Faculty for the first time for the academic year 1861/61 - he was ostentatiously neglected by his colleagues in elections to this post.Prof. Zielonacki, apart from his work with students, was also active in other areas: between 1867 and 1873 he was a member of the Autrian State Tribunal, and above all an active member of the Science Academy (from 1873 - since it was established). After Prof. Kramers death, from 1875 to 1878, he was a director of the Philosophy and History Faculty and played a significant role in establishing the Commission of Law in the Science Academy.Prof. Zielonacki died in his family estate in Goniczki on 28.04.1884.His scientific output is very ample - he wrote numerous articles and dissertations (in Latin, German and Polish) mainly on possession and usucaption. He is also an author of two monographs on servitudes (Wroclaw 1849) and on possession (Poznan 1854). The latter was also issued in Polish. The work of his lifetime was a two pans manual “Pandekta, i.e. a lecture on the Roman private law as it is the basis of the new laws” published in Polish in Cracow (1862/63, issue II 1870/1871), dedicated to “Polish youth devoting to the legal profession”. This work was greatly appreciated at his times.At present Prof. Zielonacki is groundlessly forgotten. He belonged to the most eminent Romanists of his times, he was an expen in Latin and German literature on the Roman law. He also substantially contributed to the polonization of law teaching. His personage - as an eminent scholar and patriot - it worth recalling.

The study focuses on the first position held by pharmacologist Hans Horst Meyer (1853–1939) 1 as a professor of pharmacology, dietetics, and the history of medicine at the University of Dorpat (today, Tartu University, Estonia) from 1882 to 1884. Meyer is known as the founder of pharmacology as an independent academic discipline in Vienna (Austria). 2 He competed with the well-known physiologist Gustav Piers Alexander von Bunge (1844–1920) for the position of the chairman of the department in 1881. Meyer was given the position of a professor in Dorpat instead of Gustav von Bunge (1844–1929). The outcome of the competition raises several research questions: why Meyer was allocated the chair in 1881; which arguments spoke in favour of Meyer and what was against him, what spoke against von Bunge; which historical events influenced university life in Dorpat; under which political and ideological currents the decision for the new professor was made. Events such as the Russification of the university and the assassination of Alexander II (1818–1881) significantly impacted teaching at the University of Dorpat from 1875 to 1885. During that period, both professors formed the basis of their outstanding academic careers. The arti- cle provides biographical analysis of Hans Horst Meyer based on Meyer’s files from the University’s of Tartu archive. Since Meyer competed with Gustav von Bunge for his first position as a chairholder, the biography of Gustav von Bunge has also been studied, contextualising it with the significant changes in the organisation of the University of Dorpat. Individual academic achievements of both scholars have been identified and listed using such platforms as Web of Science, Neurotree, the pharmacological journal “Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology”, The Online Books Page, and WorldCat. Afterward, the conclusions about the individual scientific portfolios of the two applicants for the chair- man of the department have been made. Finally, contributing factor to why Hans Horst Meyer was successful with his application has been identified.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-03T11:52:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013-08-30Bitstream added on 2015-03-03T12:06:37Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000805837.pdf: 752321 bytes, checksum: 29a07975db4a7d0d9e0c10973ec8d098 (MD5)
O presente trabalho tem objetivo de estudar introdutoriamente a questão metodológica em Marx. Para tanto evidenciamos as diferenças entre a construção especulativa em geral e a construção da categoria trabalho abstrato em O Capital, a fim de demonstrar que as categorias econômicas utilizadas por Marx são mais do que terminologias ou interpretações sobre as relações sociais, elas apreendem os traços constitutivos do objeto a que se referem e por isso permitem que o investigador penetre na essência do fenômeno analisado. No primeiro capítulo, examinamos o que se constitui a construção especulativa em geralpara Marx, dando particular ênfase à perspectiva de análise que adota o ponto de vista do indivíduo abstrato. Apresentamos sumariamente as condições históricas de emersão do indivíduo social, indicando como isto atribui umaaparência legítima às construções teóricas que tem o indivíduo isolado, independente e autônomo como um fundamento teórico-metodológico; e também, exploramos algumas das implicações metodológicas da adoção desses pressupostos ideais. No segundo capítulo, mostramos quais são os pressupostos adotados por Marx na elaboração de sua teoria social que configuram a perspectiva do indivíduo social e examinamos algumas das dificuldades e conflitos interpretativos referentes ao método empregado por Marx. Por fim, apresentamos com base em Chasin (2009) os lineamentos que orientam os procedimentos metodológicos de Marx
The present study aimed at studying the introductorily methodological issue in Marx. To elaborate the differences between both speculative building in general and the construction of abstract labor category in Capitalin order to demonstrate that the economic categories used by Marx are more than terminologies or interpretations of social relations, they seize the traits constituting the object to which they relate and therefore allow the investigator to penetrate the essence of the phenomenon analyzed. In the first part, we examine what constitutes speculative construction in general for Marx, with particular emphasis on analytical perspective that adopts the point of view of the abstract individual, indicating some of the methodological implications of their procedures and then show what assumptions adopted by Marxin developing his social theory that form the perspective of the social individual. In the second part, we examine some of the difficulties and conflicts of interpretation regarding the method employed by Marx and then presented based on Chasin (2009) the guidelines that guide the methodological procedures of Marx

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-12-13T11:44:38Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Mariana Morás dos Santos.pdf: 772797 bytes, checksum: f208607e7f3eb8f0dfb48315fcc25dee (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-13T11:44:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Mariana Morás dos Santos.pdf: 772797 bytes, checksum: f208607e7f3eb8f0dfb48315fcc25dee (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-09-13
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq
This work aims to discuss the Politics and State categories and their limitations and possibilities in the direction of human emancipation, under the theoretical reference proposed by Jose Chasin, with a view mainly concerning the research by the German thinker Karl Marx and the contributions that followed his thoughts. As politics are historically established to mediate and respond to the contradictions associated with the exploitation of man by man, i.e., contradictions engendered by private property, they are not inherent qualities to the Social Being in its ontological status, and are, therefore, unnecessary for the full development of social relations. The State is analyzed as an institution that shapes and ensures social contradictions and, thus, cannot be seen as a possibility to overcome sociability condensed by private property, since it is in itself the expression of this sociability. It is necessary to point out that such sociability is founded, in the production and reproduction modes of life, through labor externalization, which will be expropriated from the producer. Thus, the fruits of labor appear as foreign and strange to those who produce them. This foreign and estrangement movement is elevated towards the producer relation with the world, to the other men and to himself, since human production is a generic form of production, outlining the being that is separated from the social community. Thus, the possibility of overcoming this kind of sociability, that forges a dehumanized being, is carried out by the radical revolution of the mode of production, and it is necessary to surpass the form of work configured as foreign, since such an overtaking is itself the key to raising man to his generic conscience and, thus, oppose in order to overcome the particular forms of estrangement of being in the world, that constitute themselves as a coagulation of the inhuman, such as religion and politics. Such radical revolution must engender a reappropriation of the social forces usurped by politics, as a way of overriding the State, leading to the dissolution of the political practice of dispute of the power of State
Este trabalho pretende discutir as categorias Política e Estado, suas limitações e possibilidades no rumo da emancipação humana, sob o referencial teórico proposto por José Chasin, com um olhar principalmente às obras do pensador alemão Karl Marx e às contribuições posteriores ao seu pensamento. Sendo a política constituída historicamente para mediar e responder as contradições ligadas à exploração do homem pelo homem, ou seja, contradições engendradas pela propriedade privada, ela não é predicado inerente ao Ser Social em seu estatuto ontológico, e, por isso, é desnecessária ao pleno desenvolvimento das relações sociais. O Estado é analisado enquanto instituição que plasma e assegura as contradições sociais, de onde não pode ser visto como possibilidade à ultrapassagem da sociabilidade condensada pela propriedade privada, pois é ele mesmo a expressão dessa sociabilidade. Faz-se necessário apontar que tal sociabilidade é composta no modo de produção e reprodução da vida, por meio da exteriorização do trabalho, que será expropriado do produtor. Sendo assim, o fruto do trabalho aparece como alheio e estranho a quem o produz. Tal movimento de alienação e estranhamento é elevado à relação do produtor com o mundo, com os outros homens e consigo mesmo, por ser a produção humana forma de produção genérica, delineando o ser que está apartado da comunidade social. Assim, constata-se que a possibilidade de ultrapassar tal tipo de sociabilidade que forja um ser desumanizado é pelo revolucionamento radical do modo de produção, sendo necessário ultrapassar a forma do trabalho que se configura como estranhado, pois tal ultrapassagem é ela mesma chave para elevar o homem à sua consciência genérica e, assim, combater com vistas à ultrapassagem das formas particulares de estranhamento do ser no mundo que se constituem como coagulação do inumano, como a religião e a política. Tal revolução radical deve engendrar uma reapropriação das forças sociais usurpadas pela política, como modo de suprassunção do Estado e, assim, a dissolução da prática política de disputa do poder de Estado

La presente investigación doctoral plantea un estudio de la problemática de la emancipación humana, tanto en la obra de Karl Marx como en la obra de los primeros marxistas latinoamericanos que de manera significativa incorporaron y sistematizaron con sentido propio y desde una perspectiva latinoamericanista el materialismo dialéctico en América Latina. Se estudia el tratamiento de esta problemática a lo largo de toda la obra de Marx, y a lo largo de toda la obra de Aníbal Ponce, Julio Antonio Mella y José Carlos Mariátegui. Para ello se emplea un método analítico-crítico en base a la revisión y análisis de fuentes primarias, así como el contraste de múltiples estudios sobre las mismas, a modo de una cartografía filosófica o biografía de los conceptos. El estudio se compone de dos partes estrechamente interconectadas. Se ha tomado como punto de referencia epistémico el tratamiento de la problemática en Marx, a quien se le dedica la primera parte; y a partir de ello se delinea el tratamiento de esta misma problemática en el resto de los autores, a quienes se dedica la segunda parte a modo de tres monografías en paralelo. A partir del análisis particularizado de cada autor se realiza una valoración de contraste del conjunto de todos ellos, diagramando sintonías, puntos de inflexión y modulaciones propias. A lo largo de toda la tesis se definen y sistematizan particularidades del tratamiento de esta problemática a partir de conceptos claves y argumentos. Se analizan y contrastan elementos contextuales y fuentes referenciales, teniendo en cuenta su incidencia. Se determinan y valoran componentes epistémicos, filosófico-políticos, éticos y ontológicos, así como históricos y socio-económicos que inciden en o resultaron de la reconfiguración del tratamiento de la problemática de la emancipación humana tanto en Marx como en Ponce, Mella y Mariátegui.
This doctoral research develops a study of the problematic of human emancipation, both in the work of Marx and in the work of the first Latin American Marxists who in a significant way incorporated and systematized dialectical materialism in their own sense and from a Latin Americanist perspective. The treatment of this problematic is studied throughout the entire work of Marx, and throughout the entire work of Anibal Ponce, Julio Antonio Mella and José Carlos Mariátegui. An analytical-critical method is used based on the review and the analysis of primary sources, as well as the contrast of multiple studies on them, as a philosophical cartography or a biography of the concepts. The study is made up of two closely interconnected parts. The treatment of the problematic in Marx, to whom the first part is dedicated, has been taken as an epistemic reference point; and from this the treatment of the same problematic is diagrammed in the rest of the authors, to whom the second part is dedicated as three parallel monographs. From the individualized analysis of each author, a contrast assessment of all of them is carried out, taking into account common or equivalent arguments, inflection points and own perspectives. Throughout the thesis, particularities of the treatment of this problematic are defined and systematized based on key concepts and arguments. Contextual elements and referential sources are analyzed and contrasted, taking into account their incidence. Epistemic, philosophical-political, ethical and ontological components, as well as historical and socio-economic components in relation with the problematic of human emancipation are analyzed and valued both in Marx, Ponce, Mella and Mariátegui.

Orientador: João Carlos Kfouri Quartim de Moraes
Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-20T20:22:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Alves_AntonioJoseLopes_D.pdf: 2053693 bytes, checksum: f5cbf814beedd4c397cf75abc3623103 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012
Resumo: A presente tese resulta de pesquisa de doutoramento a qual teve por objeto o padrão de cientificidade que orienta e estrutura a crítica marxiana da economia política em sua fase de maturidade. Nesse sentido, buscou-se apreender, compreender e explicitar o conjunto de elementos e determinações conceituais a partir dos quais se organizou o pensamento de Marx no enfrentamento da decifração do modo capitalista de produção da vida humana, bem como quando da tarefa de avaliação de pensadores e correntes da economia política que pretenderam explicar cientificamente o mundo da produção do excedente. A questão inicial a que se volta Marx é precisamente explicitar a natureza do mais-valor, a forma da riqueza como capital, superando as aporias e inconsistências que caracterizaram as aproximações teóricas dos economistas. O trabalho de investigação dos textos marxianos evidenciou a existência de uma teorização cuja base é a definição do estatuto das categorias como Daseinsformen, Existenzbestimmungenen, como formas sociais de ser do existente, seja este ente, processo ou relação. As relações sociais mesmas apareceram a partir desse horizonte como formas de existência historicamente determinada dos indivíduos sociais, de sua atividade e dos produtos desta. Essa determinação vai de encontro com o que a tradição das interpretações marxistas, majoritariamente, assumia como base da exercitação científica de Marx: a dialética hegeliana. Contrapondo-se a essa posição predominante, a pesquisa, e a tese que nela se arrima, intentou descortinar e revelar o caráter da teoria marxiana acerca do capital, como uma analítica categorial das formas de ser da produção capitalista. No âmbito do desenvolvimento da pesquisa, buscou-se então determinar o mais precisamente possível o que distingue essa analítica, a delimitação da differentia specifica do objeto da reflexão marxiana. Nesse contexto, o Forschungsweise marxiano, o seu modo de investigação, e não tanto o seu modo de apresentação constante de O Capital, foi prioritariamente considerado como o centro da própria atividade científica de Marx. Assim, o Darstellungsweise revelou-se como instância determinada, e não determinante do discurso marxiano, estando sempre subsumida à ordem da analítica da forma do existente em questão a cada momento, bem como das relações que aquele guarda com outras determinações dentro de um complexo particular. Resulta disso, que a determinação mesma do momento preponderante não é tributária da eleição a priori de uma categoria em particular tomada como princípio ou chave explicativa. Ao contrário, depende da marcha da analítica como tal, da articulação que preside o ser da coisa como concreto efetivamente existente, independentemente da teoria ou dos procedimentos. A esse respeito, a própria questão de método acabou por ser reposicionada em função disso, não sendo mais entendida como núcleo da cientificidade, mas como momento igualmente determinado pelo talhe do objeto. O que encaminhou a tese da existência de um antimétodo no pensamento marxiano
Abstract: This thesis results from doctoral research which had the object of scientific standard and structure that guides the Marxian critique of political economy at its stage of maturity. Accordingly, we sought to learn, understand and explain the range of conceptual and determinations from which was organized Marx's thought in coping with the unraveling of the capitalist mode of production of human life, and when the evaluation task of thinkers and currents of political economy that sought to explain scientifically the world's production surplus. The threshold issue that turns Marx is precisely explain the nature of surplus-value, the shape of wealth as capital, overcoming the aporia and inconsistencies that have characterized the theoretical approaches of economists. The research of the Marxist texts revealed the existence of a theory whose foundation is the definition of status categories as Daseinsformen, Existenzbestimmungen as social forms of being of the existent, is this entity, process or relationship. The same socials relations that emerged from the horizon as the existence of historically determined forms of social individuals, their activity and products thereof. That determination runs counter to the tradition of Marxist interpretations, mostly, assumed as the basis of scientific exercitation Marx: the Hegelian dialectic. Opposed to this dominant position, research, and the thesis that it is anchored, brought uncover and reveal the character of the Marxian theory of capital as an analytical categorical ways of being of capitalist production. In developing the survey, we sought then to determine as precisely as possible what distinguishes this analysis, the delimitation of the differentia specifica of the object of Marxist reflection. In this context, the Marxian Forschungsweise, its mode of inquiry, rather than its mode of presentation contained in the Capital, was primarily considered as the center of scientific activity itself of Marx. Thus, the Darstellungsweise proved to be instance specific, not a determinant of Marxian discourse, being always subsumed to the order of the analytical form of matter exists in every moment, as well as that of relations with other custody determinations within a particular complex. It follows that the same determination of the tax is not currently leading the election in advance of a particular category or taken as a key explanatory principle. Rather, it's the march of analytics as such, who chairs the joint is the real thing as actually existing, regardless of theory or procedures. In this respect, the very question of method turned out to be repositioned because of this, no longer seen as core scientific, but also time as determined by the intaglio of the object. What forwarded the theory that there was an antimetod in Marxian thought
Doutorado
Filosofia
Doutor em Filosofia

This thesis is a study of the imaginative rationale governing three figureheads of the radical political imagination, Jean Jacques Rousseau, Karl Marx and Michel Foucault." "[It] focuses upon Kant’s contribution to political and moral philosophy in the limited sense of its critical functions, and, as such, concentrates upon the impairment such a radical manifestation of this critical position can exact upon history.
Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Adelaide, School of Humanities, 2007

This dissertation is a critique of Marx's theory of alienation with emphasis on how Marx constructed his definition of man and consciousness. The main premise of the theory is that private property caused alienation but the hypothesis of this dissertation is that because the theory defined man and consciousness in an erroneous manner alienation was not possible, and that the conditions observed by Marx were exacerbated by landlessness.
Political Sciences
M.A. (Politics)