Academic literature on the topic '1786-1859 Criticism and interpretation'

In Walter C. Phillips's Classic Study of 1919, Dickens, Reade, and Collins, Sensation Novelists: A Study in the Conditions and Theories of Novel Writing in Victorian England, there comes an instant when the critic believes himself to have caught the last of his novelists in a moment of artlessness. Remarking on the comforting and seemingly-conformist opening of Wilkie Collins's No Name, Phillips comments that “in the early sixties . . . the popular drift toward realism – stories of domestic life – had compelled some modification of Collins's . . . original melodramatic scheme” (133). Collins's predilection for artfulness is well-established. Rejecting his suggestions for an earlier foreshadowing of the Dr. Manette subplot in A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens comments in October 1859, “I do not positively say that the point you put, might not have been done in your manner; but I have a very strong conviction that it would have been overdone in that manner.” He goes on to characterize Collins's suggested revision as potentially off-putting for the readership because it would inevitably be discovered and the situation consequently judged “too elaborately trapped, baited, and prepared” (Letters 9: 127). This essay is in a sense an exploration of the special utility inherent in Collins's elaborately prepared traps for the reader. The elaborate plan can sometimes go places, make certain philosophical critiques, that the accommodative plot cannot. Collins was not known to be a writer who changed course easily in the face of criticism. Thus, it is surprising to find Phillips, as well as other literary critics, taking his opening in No Name seriously and as a sort of conservative retreat on Collins's part. But traps being what they are, that is, made to be fallen into, Phillips's misunderstanding is understandable. The opening of No Name does most assuredly invite such an interpretation. I will be arguing here, however, that, far from attempting to accommodate a newly emergent popular Victorian domestic taste, and pulling back from a previous subversive stance, Collins especially in his opening but also throughout his non-canonical masterpiece is actually covertly attacking that taste at its very foundations.

Resum: El 1818, l’il·lustrat menorquí Joan Ramis i Ramis (1746-1819) va publicar La Alonsíada, un poema èpic en castellà que narra la conquesta per part d’Alfons III d’Aragó de l’illa de Menorca l’any 1287, aleshores en mans sarraïnes. El mateix any es va imprimir també la traducció del text al català, L’Alonsíada, a cura del seu coetani Vicenç Albertí i Vidal (1786-1859). Tot i que es tracten d’una obra original i la seua traducció, hi ha diferències notables en la presentació de les dues versions. Aquestes divergències afectes aspectes de caire civil i polític, com són la finalitat de cada text o el públic al qual estaven adreçats. En aquesta línia, són molt interessants les implicacions que es desprenen dels paratexts presents en cadascuna de les composicions, ja que posen de manifest les distintes direccions preses per cada autor. Així doncs, en aquest article, partint de la tipologia paratextual proposada per Gérard Genette en Umbrales (1987), hem analitzat les diferències existents entre els paratexts de les dues obres. Aquest estudi ens ha permés concretar els punts civils i polítics en què divergeixen, els motius que van poder provocar les dissensions i la manera com es concreten en la globalitat de les dues obres. Paraules clau: La Alonsíada, Joan Ramis, L’Alonsíada, Vicenç Albertí, paratext Abstract: In 1818, the Menorcan enlightened Joan Ramis i Ramis (1746-1819) published La Alonsíada, an epic poem in Spanish that narrates the conquest by Alfons III of Aragon of the island of Menorca in 1287, then in Saracen hands. In the same year, the Catalan translation of the text, L’Alonsíada, was also printed by his contemporary Vicenç Albertí i Vidal (1786-1859). Although they are an original work and its translation, there are notable differences in the presentation of the two versions. These divergences affect aspects of civil and political nature, such as the purpose of each text or the audience to which they were addressed. In this line, the implications that arise from the paratexts present in each of the compositions are very interesting, since they show the different directions taken by each author. Thus, in this article, based on the paratextual typology proposed by Gérard Genette in Paratext: Tresholds of interpretation (1987), we have analyzed the differences between the paratexts of the two works. This study has allowed us to specify the civil and political points in which they diverge, the reasons that could cause the dissensions and the manner in which they are specified in the globality of the two works. Keywords: La Alonsíada, Joan Ramis, L’Alonsíada, Vicenç Albertí, paratext

AbstractIn the present paper an interpretation of the political dimension of pragmatic aesthetic reflection is proposed. The interconnection between politics and aesthetics in three classic American pragmatists: William James (1842–1910), John Dewey (1859–1952), and George Herbert Mead (1863–1931) is evoked. The author claims that by emphasizing the role of democratic values in philosophy and life, the classic American pragmatists encroach upon the field of the arts and aesthetics. Their emphasis put upon individual activity, free expression of thoughts, plurality of the forms of expression, and acceptance of criticism as a tool helping create better solutions in human cooperation can easily be converted into the postulates about the character of the artistic principles and of the nature of the aesthetic norms and values.

Summary The goal of this article is to analyse and evaluate from an art-historical perspective the artistic legacy of Count Konstanty Tyzenhauz (1786–1853) in view of his multifaceted activities and in the context of his time, by applying formal and iconographic methods of art criticism. The Count’s work is a captivating and noteworthy legacy, a testimony to the amateur creativity of aristocracy. Various publications have published or mentioned only single works by Tyzenhauz; no attempt, however, has been made to study them as a whole with regard to the art-historical approach, moreover, some of the works had not yet been published. The analysis revealed that a number of sparsely preserved works, be it drawings or watercolours, are at variance with the stylistic rendering and artistic expression, thus disclosing the Count’s creative experiments and a notable influence of his teachers Orłowski and Norblin. The views representing historical heritage objects (the Koknese, the Vilnius Gediminas, and the Trakai castles) reflect in the main the Romantic tendencies and constitute the group of the most mature Count’s artworks. However, taking account of his unique style and individual manner, images of Rokiškis and the surrounding areas, as well as drawings of birds, stand out for the distinctive interpretation and comprise the most original group. They are romanticised, authentic visual fragments of his time and familiar environment. Art was not the Count’s main and professional endeavour, likewise for a number of noblemen of the epoch, but his artistic inclination let him adapt his talent for scientific purposes. No doubt, Tyzenhauz’s works that feature birds and various architectural objects are of important scientific, historical and iconographic value.

Photo by Mufid Majnun on Unsplash INTRODUCTION In 2007, the Nuffield Council of Bioethics introduced the “Intervention ladder” as a guiding framework[1] to evaluate the impact on individual liberty of various public health measures. One criticism of the ladder is that it reflects a narrow view of liberty, yet other researchers adapted the intervention ladder to incorporate a more autonomy-based view. Recently, academics and public health officials have used intervention ladders as guides in framing policies, particularly COVID-19 pandemic policies.[2] Analyzing the Indian COVID-19 vaccination drive under these two ladders can illuminate the concepts of liberty underlying those ladders and help determine the best framework on a philosophical basis. ANALYSIS l. Case Study: The Indian COVID-19 Vaccination Drive On January 16, 2021, India attempted a public vaccination drive.[3] The drug regulatory body Central Drugs Standards Control Organization (CDSCO) approved two vaccines, Covishield and Covaxin, for emergency use.[4] The approval was granted despite a clear lack of phase 3 clinical trial data for both of these vaccines.[5] Covishield, produced by the Serum Institute of India, is the Indian variant of the Astra-Zeneca vaccine that has shown an average efficiency of 70.4 percent after trials in the UK.[6] Covaxin, manufactured by Bharat Biotech in collaboration with the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) National Institute of Virology, was developed and manufactured in India. [7] Covishield relied on the safety and efficacy data from large trials conducted in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK with 24,000 participants and a small cohort for the Indian study. Covaxin was given approval based only on phase-1 trial data. [8] An article published in The Lancet called for further efficacy data from the Covaxin study.[9] The officials associated with Bharat Biotech, as well as the Indian Council of Medical Research, maintained that fast production of the vaccine does not indicate a compromise in safety, even though they had little data to produce.[10] However, transparency is key to vaccination policy, which requires public participation. The media reported that the Covaxin clinical trials compromised research integrity by providing a monetary incentive of around 7 euros, to research subjects. People’s University, a private medical college, and hospital, recruited survivors of the Bhopal Gas tragedy for the Covaxin study. The participants were told that they were being provided a vaccine against COVID-19 without clarifying that data was being collected for their clinical study. There was no record of informed consent from these participants for the Covaxin study.[11] The media reported the death of a 42-year-old individual who received his first dose on December 23, 2020. [12] Although it was reported that the cause of death was not linked to the vaccine, the death added to vaccine hesitancy. The vaccines were provided for free to the frontline healthcare workers with no choice on which vaccine the recipients would receive.[13] Similarly, in the US, some people do not have a choice between Pfizer or Moderna. In the UK and the US, data from phase 3 trials are known with a periodic follow-up after the administration of the second dose.[14] The WHO developed a tracking system for COVID-19 vaccine recipients which was updated on March 19, 2021, to reflect the results of Covaxin phase 3 trials.[15] India eliminated choice although the two vaccines approved for emergency use did not have the depth of research that those used elsewhere had. The intervention ladder, discussed below, which uses proportionality and the harm principle to justify the lack of choice between the vaccines in the UK and the US, should not be applied to India’s vaccination policy. ll. The Nuffield Intervention Ladder The foundational principle underlying the Nuffield Intervention Ladder is Mill’s conception of individual liberty from the prominent work, On Liberty.[16] However, the Council recognizes that the intervention ladder is conceived on a broader interpretation of Mill’s liberty, using the principle of proportionality as a tool for justification i.e., the desired effect from the intervention is proportional to the loss incurred in liberty.[17] As shown in Table 1, an ideal intervention that is least infringing would then be no intervention at all. An intervention that would be more difficult to justify would be one that significantly restricts individual liberty. Intuitively, eliminating occupies the topmost rung on the ladder. The metaphor of the ladder suggests that as one climbs up the rungs of the ladder, stronger justifications would be required. Table 1: Examples of interventions at each level of the intervention ladder adapted and improvised from the Nuffield Council of Bioethics Report, 2007. A voluntary vaccination policy is one public health intervention that is acceptable and justifiable in terms of the principle of proportionality as well as Mill’s Harm Principle, with emphasis on diminishing individual liberties when actions might result in harm to others.[18] Although a vaccination policy in the context of a global pandemic seems justifiable through the lens of the intervention ladder, the Indian modus operandi is unique because of inherent problems with the original conception of the intervention ladder. By pausing to elaborate and reflect on the Indian context as a case study, we can demonstrate that individual liberty should not be the sole variable in framing justifiability. lll. Critiquing the Nuffield Intervention Ladder & Adding a Precautionary Approach In his paper, ‘Snakes and Ladders: State Interventions and the Place of Liberty in Public Health Policy’, Angus Dawson criticizes the intervention ladder’s focus on individual liberty,.[19] and its inability to account for the different treatment of incentives and disincentives and the role of information. Public health institutions require public participation to restrict the infectious spread of COVID-19. The lack of transparency and minimal information surrounding the vaccines have been a major hurdle in increasing public participation. It is contradictory to think that the public does not require information about interventions and have the ability of self-determination to guide them, when in fact self-determination presupposes possession of relevant information. A voluntary vaccination policy can be seen as sitting on either the lowest rung (providing information) or the rung of enabling choice, as a vaccination campaign does both. However, in India, the precautionary principle should also be applied as providing the choice should not permit ‘harm’. The precautionary principle holds that anything that poses a risk to human health or the environment should be avoided or accompanied by precautionary measures. In India, because the clinical trials were smaller and there is less proof of safety and efficacy, a vaccination requirement, or a public health campaign to encourage vaccination violates the principle. The proportionality principle governing the intervention ladder only requires that the benefits of the intervention justify the restrictions on liberty. The intervention ladder should prevent requiring healthcare worker vaccination without a choice of vaccine because a free choice requires transparency and more information than is available from the small early-stage clinical trials. Actions surrounding the vaccines in India do not reflect proper precaution or a proportionate and thus acceptable restriction on liberty. If there is no ability to choose between the two possible vaccines, then they should not be mandatory for healthcare workers. The Indian government and its officials have urged healthcare worker compliance by invoking the seriousness of the pandemic and the alarming rates of mortality rather than providing transparent data pursuant to the regulatory mechanisms of the vaccine clinical trial. For a healthcare worker, the duty to provide service and a stronger obligation to do so in the time of a pandemic already imposes certain restrictions on their liberty. The lack of choice in opting for a preferred vaccine puts it on a higher rung on the intervention ladder and thus requires stronger justifications. This case study reveals how the same public health intervention falls on different rungs of the intervention ladder depending on the target group in consideration. Or to put this simply, choice is contextual. Table 2: The ethical values at stake when it comes to “choice” lV. An Autonomy-Based Intervention Ladder Liberty and autonomy differ slightly: liberty revolves around the constraints on the ability to act, whereas autonomy stresses on the independence and the authenticity of the willingness to act.[20] It is thus possible for an individual to be autonomous but unfree, as can be seen from the inability to opt for a preferred vaccine.[21] Figure 1 shows an adapted schematic of an autonomy-based intervention ladder as proposed by Griffiths et al. Figure 1: An adapted schematic of the autonomy-based intervention ladder proposed by Griffiths, P.E and West, C. In comparing the original intervention ladder with their proposal, we see that the autonomy-based model allows for a negative scale in terms of its effects on autonomy. Thus, on this ladder, actions can be autonomy-enhancing or autonomy-diminishing. Such a model challenges the one-directional view of the ladder and rearranges interventions on a scale that ranges from negative to positive. A few interventions that were shown to have restrictive effects on liberty now have reinforcing effects when viewed through the lens of autonomy. Thus, providing information and educating can be seen as positive reinforcements for autonomous choice rather than infringing on individual liberty. The autonomy-based intervention ladder requires the State to implement interventions and design policies in a manner that reinforces autonomy. Information and education allow individuals to be free and equal participants in public health discourses. As seen in the original intervention ladder restricting choice, as well as eliminating it, still fall in the negative, autonomy-infringing side of the ladder. Thus, requiring stronger justifications for their implementation. The only difference between the two is the manner in which the new model ensures the availability of a choice when the precautionary, as well as the proportionality principle, have not been met to a sufficient extent. Ensuring choice and exercising it becomes much more relevant in making people autonomous. The frontline worker thus can opt for a vaccine they prefer. Thereby, helping them navigate the moral conundrum of opting to get vaccinated, easing their moral burden. It also places strict vigilance over regulatory mechanisms that are involved in clinical trials since the burden of proof now involves providing information as a clear operational motive. This ameliorates public tendencies of hesitancy can be alleviated in this respect. An autonomy-based intervention ladder is not in conflict with Mill’s conception of liberty since Mill himself does not automatically assume a cost to liberty when the State seems to employ public education campaigns to inform the public.[22] CONCLUSION The original intervention ladder was conceived to remedy the hurdles that a traditional liberal landscape brings in implementing a public health intervention and to protect individual liberties. The intervention ladder assumes an inverse relationship between public health and freedom. Rethinking the intervention ladder from a different perspective allows a proper role of the dissemination of information, recognizing that consent relies on information. An autonomy ladder acts as a starting point for rethinking public health and how it can foster autonomy as well as impede it. By focusing on autonomy, the benefits that can be gained from educational and informational campaigns are viewed as reinforcing autonomy. Autonomy is vital to liberty. COVID-19 has brought a unique set of ethical issues that have questioned conventionally accepted frameworks and calls for a substantive, alternative approach to public health ethics. [1] Nuffield Council on Bioethics, “Public Health: Ethical Issues.” Nuffieldbioethics.org, Nov 13, 2007. www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/public-health. Accessed 9 May 2021. [2] Giubilini A, The Ethics of Vaccination [Internet]. Cham (CH): Palgrave Pivot; 2019. Chapter 3, “Vaccination Policies and the Principle of Least Restrictive Alternative: An Intervention Ladder.” 2018 Dec 29, 2018. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538385/. [3] Dash, Sachinta. “India Begins Its COVID-19 Vaccination Drive — Here’s a Look at How the World’s Largest Vaccine Rollout Is Set to Take Place.” Business Insider India, January 16, 2021, www.businessinsider.in/india/news/india-will-begin-its-covid-19-vaccination-drive-tomorrow-heres-everything-you-need-to-know/articleshow/80281740.cms. Accessed 9 May 2021. ‌ [4] Special Correspondent, “Coronavirus | India Approves COVID-19 Vaccines Covishield and Covaxin for Emergency Use,” The Hindu, January 3, 2021, www.thehindu.com/news/national/drug-controller-general-approves-covishield-and-covaxin-in-india-for-emergency-use/article33485539.ece. Accessed 9 May 2021. ‌ [5] Thiagarajan, Kamala, “Covid-19: India Is at Centre of Global Vaccine Manufacturing, but Opacity Threatens Public Trust.” BMJ, January 28, 2021. www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n196, 10.1136/bmj.n196. [6] Thiagarajan, Kamala. [7] Bharat Biotech, “COVAXIN - India’s First Indigenous Covid-19 Vaccine | Bharat Biotech.” www.bharatbiotech.com/covaxin.html. [8] Prasad, R. “Coronavirus | Vaccine Dilemma — to Take or Not to Take Covaxin.” The Hindu, January 15, 2021, www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/health/vaccine-dilemma-to-take-or-not-to-take-covaxin/article33577223.ece. [9] Ella, Raches, et al. “Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine, BBV152: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Phase 1 Trial.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 5, January 21, 2021, pp. 637–646, www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30942-7/fulltext, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30942-7. [10] Thiagarajan, Kamala. [11] Thiagarajan, Kamala. ‌ [12] Nichenametla, Prasad. “Bhopal Volunteer’s Death Unrelated to Covaxin, Says Bharat Biotech.” Deccan Herald, 9 Jan. 2021, www.deccanherald.com/national/bhopal-volunteers-death-unrelated-to-covaxin-says-bharat-biotech-937199.html. [13] Thiagarajan, Kamala. ‌ [14] Thiagarajan, Kamala. ‌ [15] World Health Organization, “Draft Landscape of COVID-19 Candidate Vaccines.” www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines. Accessed 9 May 2021. ‌ [16] John Stuart Mill. On Liberty. 1859. S.L., Arcturus Publishing Ltd, 1859. [17] Nuffield. “Public Health: Ethical Issues.” [18] John Stuart Mill. On Liberty. p 13. [19] Dawson, Angus J. “Snakes and Ladders: State Interventions and the Place of Liberty in Public Health Policy.” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 42, no. 8, May 23, 2016, pp. 510–513, 10.1136/medethics-2016-103502. [20] Griffiths, P.E., and C. West. “A Balanced Intervention Ladder: Promoting Autonomy through Public Health Action.” Public Health, vol. 129, no. 8, August 2015, pp. 1092–1098, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26330372/, 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.08.007 [21] Thaler, Richard H, and Cass R Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. London, Penguin Books, 2008. ‌ [22] Griffiths, P.E., and C. West.

Fairy Tales have been an important part of peoples' cultural heritage since time immemorial. From a very early age on, children hear stories about witches, giants, dwarf's, and magicians which make up their first entry into the literary world. Only recently have scholars begun to research just how much influence these stories have on children and how they might have a different impact on girls than on boys. This thesis will investigate the world of fairy tales in relation to their historical context and their differing relevance for male and female readers. I will examine the fairy tales of the brothers Grimm and of Ludwig Bechstein because these three scholars count among the most important fairy tale narrators in the German-speaking region. I will limit my examination to the witch in fairy tales because of all the figures she seems to have the most impact on the audience.

In this thesis, I analyze literary histories published between 1845 and 1914 to demonstrate a pattern of reception regarding the works of Bettine von Arnim. I will ask how this writer was able to express her radical social-political attitude in writing--relatively unscathed by the repressions of restoration. It will be apparent that a female political author, considered less of a risk to society, faced fewer dangers of censorship than her male counterparts. At the same time, 19th century definitions of Bourgeois women's behavior also served to marginalize her work. She was called a "child" not to be taken seriously, placed in the shadow of men (Goethe, Clemens Brentano, Achim von Arnim), and her life was generally considered before her work. This placement of the woman outside the realm of the important, her construction as other, caused her exclusion from the canon.

This thesis analyzes Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's contribution to the revival of chivalric ideals in late Victorian England. The primary sources of this study are Doyle's historical novels and the secondary sources address the different aspects of the revival of the chivalric ideals. The first two chapters introduce Doyle's historical novels, and the final four chapters define the revival, the class and gender issues surrounding the revival, and the illustration of these in Doyle's novels. The conclusion of the thesis asserts that Doyle supported the revival of chivalric ideals, and the revival attempted to maintain, in the late nineteenth century, the traditional class and gender structure of the Middle Ages.

While literary critics heretofore have subordinated Conan Doyle to more "canonical" writers, the author argues that his writings enrich our understanding of the ways in which Victorians and Edwardians constructed their identity as imperialists and that we therefore cannot afford to overlook Conan Doyle's work.

For his first work composed without Schoenberg's supervision, Berg chose to set five short poems by his friend and intellectual idol, the controversial poet Peter Altenberg. Carrying the title Filnf Orchesterlieder nach Ansichtskarten-Texten von Peter Altenberg (1912), the cycle is at once aphoristic (with respect to the songs' duration) and titanic (with respect to their orchestration and motivic density). But the title invites the question: what imagery might the composer have hoped to illustrate with these musical postcards? This thesis investigates text-music relations in Berg's opus 4 with the objective of showing that the music's structure, far from being semantically neutral, participates actively in the création of rich poetic imagery anchored in the socio-cultural context of turn-of-the-century Vienna. Previous studies focus on the work's cyclic motives its interval-cycle substructure. The present study focuses on text-music relations and voice leading - the contrapuntal and harmonie procedures which govern the music's surface and determine its deep structure. It is shown that the voice-leading structures of the individual lieder - in both local detail and at a more broadly conceptual level - give form, meaning, and nuance to the poetic image that emerges in each song, and help define the different facets—physical, emotional, and spiritual — of the protagonist that inhabits them.

Zhu, Xinqu.
Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2013.
Includes bibliographical references.
Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web.
Abstracts also in Chinese.

徐瑋.
"2006年7月"
論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2006.
參考文獻(leaves 199-207).
"2006 nian 7 yue"
Abstracts also in English.
Xu Wei.
Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2006.
Can kao wen xian (leaves 199-207).
緒論 --- p.1
Chapter 第一節 --- 硏究目的 --- p.1
Chapter 第二節 --- 前人硏究回顧 --- p.3
Chapter 第三節 --- 硏究方法 --- p.8
Chapter 甲部 --- 況周頤詞析論 --- p.10
Chapter 第一章 --- 況周頤詞集槪述及其分期 --- p.11
Chapter 第一節 --- 況周頤詞集簡介 --- p.11
Chapter 第二節 --- 況周頤詞的分期 --- p.14
Chapter 第二章 --- 論《蕙風詞》的命名與況周頤詞的主調 --- p.25
Chapter 第一節 --- 小引 --- p.25
Chapter 第二節 --- 「蕙風」二字的意義及其相關問題 --- p.26
Chapter 第三節 --- 「內冤結而心傷」的況周頤詞 --- p.31
Chapter 1. --- 美好事物的消逝 --- p.35
Chapter 甲、 --- 從季節的變化寫美好事物的消逝 --- p.37
Chapter 乙、 --- 對過去的繾綣 --- p.42
Chapter 丙、 --- 知愛斷絶 --- p.44
Chapter 2. --- 勞生之感 --- p.49
Chapter 3. --- 芳姿誤人的悲歎 --- p.56
Chapter 4. --- 「大」之旨的表現 --- p.61
Chapter 第四節 --- 小結 --- p.66
Chapter 第三章 --- 「沈思獨往」一論況周頤詞的章法結構、化用前人詩詞處、用字 --- p.67
Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.67
Chapter 第二節 --- 況周頤詞的章法結構 --- p.70
Chapter 1. --- 善於鋪敘，層次分明´ة於轉折處筆法尤細 --- p.71
Chapter 2. --- 渾然一體，一氣流轉 --- p.76
Chapter 3. --- 組詞內容新穎，結構綿密 --- p.81
Chapter 第三節 --- 況周頤詞化用前人詩詞處 --- p.86
Chapter 第四節 --- 論況周頤詞用字 --- p.94
Chapter 第五節 --- 餘論 --- p.98
Chapter 第四章 --- 「務極悠揚流美之致」一論況周頤詞的聲律 --- p.102
Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.102
Chapter 第二節 --- 律調 --- p.103
Chapter 第三節 --- 腔調 --- p.108
Chapter 第四節 --- 用韻 --- p.110
Chapter 第五節 --- 總結 --- p.113
Chapter 第五章 --- 況周頤詞綜論 --- p.115
Chapter 乙部 --- 況周頤詞論舉要 --- p.118
Chapter 第六章 --- 小引 --- p.119
Chapter 第一節 --- 況周頤詞論著作槪述 --- p.119
Chapter 第二節 --- 況氏詞論之硏究方法 --- p.121
Chapter 第七章 --- 詞外求詞一兼論況周頤對詞人與詞作關係的處理 --- p.126
Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.126
Chapter 第二節 --- 「言爲心聲」與「詞固不可槪人」 --- p.127
Chapter 第三節 --- 性靈、性情與讀書 --- p.132
Chapter 第四節 --- 餘論 --- p.139
Chapter 第五節 --- 小結 --- p.142
Chapter 第八章 --- 論「詞境」、「詞心」 --- p.143
Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.143
Chapter 第二節 --- 「詞境」和「詞心」的意涵 --- p.143
Chapter 第三節 --- 論學者釋「詞境」與「詞心」 --- p.147
Chapter 第四節 --- 況氏之「詞境」與王國維的「境界」 --- p.150
Chapter 第九章 --- 論「寄託」與「真」 --- p.155
Chapter 第一節 --- 清代詞論家的寄託說 --- p.155
Chapter 第二節 --- 況周頤的寄託說 --- p.158
Chapter 第三節 --- 況氏的「真」與其寄託說的關係 --- p.160
Chapter 第十章 --- 論「重、拙、大」及其相關問題 --- p.162
Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.162
Chapter 第二節 --- 論「重」 --- p.164
Chapter 第三節 --- 論「拙」 --- p.174
Chapter 第四節 --- 論「大」 --- p.179
Chapter 第五節 --- 論「深靜」與「穆之一境」 --- p.186
Chapter 第六節 --- 小結 --- p.190
Chapter 第十一章 --- 餘論 --- p.191
總結 --- p.197
參考書目 --- p.199
附錄一 況周頤生平簡表 --- p.208
附錄二 趙尊嶽述《玉梅詞》中有關桐娟詞作之本事商榷 --- p.225
附錄三《蕙風詞話》鑑賞資料統計 --- p.235
附錄四後人對況周頤詞論的回應 --- p.256

Law, Ki Fung.
Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2013.
Includes bibliographical references.
Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web.
Abstracts also in Chinese.