Academic literature on the topic '1700-1766'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic '1700-1766.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "1700-1766"
Weing, Siegfried, and Phillip Marshall Mitchell. "Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700-1766): Harbinger of German Classicism." South Atlantic Review 60, no. 3 (September 1995): 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3201157.
Full textMenhennet, Alan, and P. M. Mitchell. "Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700-1766): Harbinger of German Classicism." Modern Language Review 92, no. 1 (January 1997): 239. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3734776.
Full textBerk, Seth. "Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700–1766): Philosophie, Poetik und Wissenschaft ed. by Eric Achermann." Goethe Yearbook 22, no. 1 (2015): 298–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2015.0009.
Full textBitzel, Alexander. "Johann Lorenz von Mosheim (1693–1755), Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700–1766) und die Predigt." Evangelische Theologie 78, no. 2 (April 1, 2018): 126–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.14315/evth-2018-0206.
Full textRoth, Kersten Sven. "Wissenschaftsrhetorik." Historiographia Linguistica 31, no. 2-3 (December 31, 2004): 329–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.31.2.06rot.
Full textRoth, Kersten Sven. "Wissenschaftsrhetorik: Johann Christoph GottschedsAusführliche Redekunst(1759) als Lehre vom Wissenstransfer." Historiographia Linguistica International Journal for the History of the Language Sciences 31, no. 2-3 (2004): 329–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.31.2-3.06rot.
Full textKRAHE NOBLETT, Cinta, and Mercedes SIMAL LÓPEZ. "Ornato y menaje «de la China del Japón» en la España de Felipe V e Isabel de Farnesio (1700-1766)." Cuadernos Dieciochistas 19 (December 23, 2018): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/cuadieci201819951.
Full textNoblett, Cinta Krahe, Mercedes Simal López, and Isabel Adey. "Ornament and Household Goods from ‘China of Japan’ during the Reign of Philip V and Elisabeth Farnese of Spain (1700–1766)." Art in Translation 11, no. 3 (July 3, 2019): 286–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2019.1693224.
Full textDurbas, Małgorzata. "Knowledge and Technology Transfer in the Age of Enlightenment: The Scientific Correspondence between Franciszek Bieliński (1683-1766) and Henri Louis Duhamel du Monceau (1700-1782)." Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum 8, no. 2 (December 10, 2020): 128–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.08.
Full textCurrie, Pamela. "Reviews : Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700-1766). By P. M. Mitchell. Columbia, SC: Camden House, Inc., 1995. (Distributed by Boydell & Brewer, Woodbridge.) Pp. x + 131. £37.00." Journal of European Studies 26, no. 1 (March 1996): 94–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004724419602600116.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "1700-1766"
Quéval, Marie-Hélène. "Les paradoxes d'Éros, ou l'amour dans l'oeuvre de Johann Christoph Gottsched." Paris 4, 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994PA040120.
Full textGottsched has a paradoxical personnality and cultivates paradox (Cicero, Diderot) as a philosophical method. The paradox of gallantry is that it raises woman to the status of goddess in order to ensure her subjugation to male power, in place of the effeminate ideal of gallantry (the hermaphrodite), Gottsched promotes the ideal of the androgyne (the virile, emancipated woman). In place of gallant love, he favors reasoned love (Plato, Aristotle, Thomasius). The second section establishes and defines links between Gottsched and the erudite French libertines, such as Gassendi, le Vayer and Fontenelle, while emphasizing the importance of opposition to Lutheran orthodoxy. Leibnizian optimism is a wager. Eros is at the center of a series of paradoxes which counter those associated with Bayle. Finally, in the field of aesthetics, Gottsched is the voice of sensitive rationalism, arguing that tragedy arouses passionate feelings. He highlights the paradoxical nature of the pleasure forn of stage tragedy: the spectator draws pleasure from his or her own suffering. Gottsched rejects gallantry, not love, for catharsis takes on aesthetic meaning and value, overcoming suffering through formal beauty, thus allowing access to the sublime
Julliard, Catherine. "La réception des théories esthétiques françaises par le théâtre allemand de la Frühaufklarung." Paris 4, 1992. http://www.theses.fr/1992PA040127.
Full textThe period to be studied, a domain that has been until now little explored, extends over the first decades of the eighteenth century and is characterized by different ruptures with the previous century, particularly with the formal and conceptual heritage of the second Silesian school. The psychological situation of the epoch is defined by the German consciousness of deficiencies in the dramatic and cultural sphere, increased by the reactions of foreigners who mock German literature. The specific German situation is the origin of the reception of French dramatic theories. The reception, or the passage from one cultural sphere to another, meets German expectations, and the borrowings play a cardinal part in the elaboration of a new dramatic theoretical edifice. The model advocated by Gottsched, who is the focus of the study, is France, a successful example of a national culture, an ideal of dramatic theory which is based on norms. The method employed consists in a reading of texts in French and German theory with the consideration of major themes. The study shows that Gottsched is inspired by the French classical and neoclassical tradition. It attempts to reveal the coherence of the French contributions that the German writer integrates into the edification of his national program
NOKKALA, Ere Pertti. "Passions and the German enlightenment : the political thought of J.H.G. von Justi." Doctoral thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/14985.
Full textExamining Board: Prof. Martin van Gelderen (European University Institute) supervisor; Prof. Hans Erich Bödeker (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, External supervisor); Prof. Pasi Ihalainen (University of Jyväskylä); Prof. Sebastian Conrad (European University Institute)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
This thesis is the first comprehensive interpretation of J.H.G. von Justi’s political and international thought. It demonstrates that the intellectual world of Justi was much more diverse and open than has previously been admitted. The same is true of the tradition of cameralism which has been largely misunderstood. Cameralism was not an obstacle for the reception of natural law theories that emphasised the passionate and self-interested side of the human nature. On the contrary, it was Justi who built his sciences of state on the foundation of natural law. So far those scholars who have admitted the importance of the natural law to Justi - with the exception of Horst Dreitzel - have fallen back on the idea that the natural law Justi adopted was that of Christian Wolff, an interpretation which is in itself another sign of the belief that German enlightenment was a unitary movement. However, it was the natural law of Schmauss and not of Wolff on which Justi built his theory of the state and similarly, of international relations. The German enlightenment was not a singular movement solely in the hands of rationalist metaphysicians. One of the guiding lines of this thesis is that Justi’s entire thought was constructed to oppose this tradition.
Books on the topic "1700-1766"
Achermann, Eric, ed. Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700-1766). München: DE GRUYTER, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/9783050060576.
Full textMitchell, Phillip Marshall. Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700-1766): Harbinger of German classicism. Columbia, S.C: Camden House, 1995.
Find full textJohann Christoph Gottsched (1700-1766): Harbinger of German classicism. Columbia, S.C: Camden House, 1995.
Find full textAchermann, Eric, Nadine Lenuweit, and Vincenz Pieper. Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700-1766): Philosophie, Poetik und Wissenschaft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2014.
Find full textLeinster, William Robert FitzGerald, Duke of, 1749-1804., ed. Lord Kildare's grand tour: The letters of William FitzGerald, 1766-1769. Wilton, Cork: Collins Press, 2000.
Find full textStädtische Galerie Karlsruhe (1997- ) and Südwestdeutsches Archiv für Architektur und Ingenieurbau an der Universität Karlsruhe, eds. Friedrich Weinbrenner, 1766-1826: Architektur und Städtebau des Klassizismus : Ausstellung der Städtischen Galerie Karlsruhe und des Südwestdeutschen Archivs für Architektur und Ingenieurbau am KIT, 27. Juni 2015 bis 4. Oktober 2015. Petersberg: Michael Imhof Verlag, 2015.
Find full textT, Scull Andrew, ed. Customers and patrons of the mad-trade: The management of lunacy in eighteenth-century London : with the complete text of John Monro's 1766 case book. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2003.
Find full textAndrews, Jonathan. Customers and patrons of the mad-trade: The management of lunacy in eighteenth-century London : with the complete text of John Monro's 1766 case book / Jonathan Andrews and Andrew Scull. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003.
Find full textClap, Thomas. The Annals Or History of Yale-College, 1700 to 1766. Franklin Classics, 2018.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "1700-1766"
Brodie, Allan. "T. B. Burr, The History of Tunbridge-Wells (1766)." In Travel and Tourism in Britain, 1700–1914, 113–16. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003112983-15.
Full textBrodie, Allan. "T. B. Burr, The History of Tunbridge-Wells (1766)." In Travel and Tourism in Britain, 1700–1914, 259–69. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003112983-30.
Full text"Johann Christoph Gottsched, 1700–1766." In Translating Literature: the German Tradition from Luther to Rosenzweig, 13–17. BRILL, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789401200295_005.
Full textStrassberger, Andres. "Johann Christoph Gottsched (1700–1766) und die „philosophische“ Predigt: Studien zur aufklärerischen Transformation der protestantischen Homiletik im Spannungsfeld von Theologie, Philosophie, Rhetorik und Politik." In Jahrbuch der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (2009). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110222968.324.
Full textRowley-Conwy, Peter. "Ireland: Realm of the Four Masters." In From Genesis to Prehistory. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199227747.003.0010.
Full text