Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Xenophon Criticism and interpretation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Xenophon Criticism and interpretation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Xenophon Criticism and interpretation":
Danzig, Gabriel. „THE USE AND ABUSE OF CRITIAS: CONFLICTING PORTRAITS IN PLATO AND XENOPHON“. Classical Quarterly 64, Nr. 2 (20.11.2014): 507–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009838814000093.
Senchuk, Dennis M., und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism.“ Noûs 26, Nr. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.
Zaret, David, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Contemporary Sociology 17, Nr. 1 (Januar 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.
Rosen, Bernard. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.
Gorski, Philip S. „SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM“. Zygon� 25, Nr. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.
Rosen, Bernard, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.
Rosenberg, Ruth, und Jerome J. McGann. „Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation“. South Central Review 3, Nr. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.
Morrow, Jeffrey L. „The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’“. New Blackfriars 91, Nr. 1035 (12.08.2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.
Evans, R. L. S., und George A. Kennedy. „New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Classical World 80, Nr. 3 (1987): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350026.
Davies, Paul, Greta Gaard und Patrick D. Murphy. „Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy“. Modern Language Review 95, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2000): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3736723.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Xenophon Criticism and interpretation":
Katsaros, Andrea Helen. „Literary perspectives on Pseudo-Xenophon's Athenaion Politeia“. Title page, contents and abstract only, 2001. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phk196.pdf.
Hoyer, Steven. „Intention and interpretation“. Thesis, McGill University, 1993. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=68104.
Chapter two is about interpretation. I open the chapter with an examination of extreme conventionalist theses, arguing that their success depends on an unjustifiably strict demarcation between intentionality and textuality. Appropriating aspects of Donald Davidson's work in the philosophy of language, I argue for the recognition of linguistic communication as a form of intentional action. I then defend this thesis against more moderate conventionalist theories to offer a viable approach to the interpretation of literary works.
Anger, Suzy. „Victorian hermeneutics and literary interpretation /“. Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/9374.
Meir, Amira. „Medieval Jewish interpretation of pentateuchal poetry“. Thesis, McGill University, 1994. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=28842.
The effort begins by defining Pentateuchal poetry and discussing a range of its presentations by various ancient writers. Subsequent chapters examine its treatment by Rabbi Saadia Gaon of Baghdad (882-942), Abraham Ibn Ezra of Spain (1089-1164), Samuel Ben Meir (1080-1160) and Joseph Bekhor Shor (12th century) of Northern France, David Kimhi of Provence (1160-1235), and Obadiah Sforno of Italy (1470-1550).
While all of these commentators wrote on the poetic passages, none differentiated systematically between Pentateuchal prose and poetry or treated them in substantially different ways. Samuel Ben Meir, Ibn Ezra, Bekhor Shor, and Kimhi did discuss some poetic features of these texts. The other two men were far less inclined to do so, but occasionally recognized some differences between prose and poetry and some phenomena unique to the latter.
Turner, Seth. „Revelation 11:1-13 : history of interpretation“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2005. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:57efe3b3-7c61-412f-9001-5269860a896d.
Nicol, George Grey. „Studies in the interpretation of Genesis 26.1-33“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 1987. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8fff7ce7-9a50-4011-9f54-5776c84aa36a.
Bennett, Richard. „Variations : influence intertextuality, and Milan Kundera, Jean Rhys, and Tom Stoppard“. Thesis, McGill University, 1994. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=26254.
Chapter two deals with theories of intertextuality, principally those of Julia Kristeva and Michael Riffaterre. As alternatives to theories of influence, neither proves satisfactory. Both founder on the contradictory goal to explain all literature, at the expense of recognizing literary diversity.
Chapter three concerns literary variations. These are texts which are deliberately premised on pre-existing texts. I focus on three examples from this class of literary texts which is not satisfactorily dealt with by any of the theories I consider. I pursue a less wide-ranging approach in order to unearth important features of literary variations.
Graham, Catherine (Catherine Elizabeth). „Standpoints : the dramaturgy of Margaretta D'Arcy and John Arden“. Thesis, McGill University, 1991. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=60621.
Petersen, Jeffrey J. 1981. „Playful Conversations: A Study of Shared Dynamics Between the Plays of Paula Vogel and Sarah Ruhl“. Thesis, University of Oregon, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/10155.
Pulitzer Prize winning playwright Paula Vogel, playwright and educator, has blazed a trail in American theatre, opening new avenues for female playwrights. In 2005 Vogel's student Sarah Ruhl burst onto the scene with her play The Clean House. As one of the most produced playwrights of 2005, Ruhl has been celebrated as the new voice of American theatre. There are similarities, as might be expected between teacher and former student, but some of the similarities suggest something more: a dynamic shared between Vogel's and Ruhl's plays which suggests an ongoing theatrical conversation and may suggest directions for future American drama.
Committee in Charge: Dr. John Schmor, Chair; Dr. Jennifer Schlueter
Kilian, Monica. „The exile's experience : an examination of the poetry of Hilde Domin and Waclaw Iwaniuk“. Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1987. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/26855.
Arts, Faculty of
English, Department of
Graduate
Bücher zum Thema "Xenophon Criticism and interpretation":
Pucci, Pietro. Xenophon: Socrates' defense. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 2002.
Mueller-Goldingen, Christian. Xenophon: Philosophie und Geschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2007.
Schiffmann, Bettina. Untersuchungen zu Xenophon: Tugend, Eigenschaft, Verhalten, Folgen. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 1993.
Tuplin, Christopher, und Fiona Hobden. Xenophon: Ethical principles and historical enquiry. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
Upton, Bridget Gilfillan. Hearing Mark's endings: Listening to ancient popular texts through speech act theory. Leiden: Brill, 2004.
Upton, Bridget Gilfillan. Hearing Mark's endings: Listening to ancient popular texts through speech act theory. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
Toalster, David. Unzeitgemässe Feldherren: Der Hipparch als Prototyp des erfolgreichen Feldherrn in Xenophons Hellenika. Gutenberg: Computus Druck Satz & Verlag, 2011.
Lu, Houliang. Xenophon's theory of moral education. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.
Pomeroy, Sarah B. Xenophon, Oeconomicus: A social and historical commentary. Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Wilms, Hartmut. Techne und Paideia bei Xenophon und Isokrates. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner, 1995.
Buchteile zum Thema "Xenophon Criticism and interpretation":
Bogel, Fredric V. „New Formalist Interpretation“. In New Formalist Criticism, 102–52. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137362599_4.
Cohen, Ralph. „Literary Criticism and Artistic Interpretation“. In Reason and Imagination, 279–306. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003222996-14.
Bonelli, Paolo, Giorgio Guidotti, Enrico Paolini und Giulio Spinucci. „Pacemaker Stimulation Criticism at ECG“. In New Concepts in ECG Interpretation, 175–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91677-4_16.
Wang, Fengzhen. „Marxist Literary Criticism in China“. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 715–22. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_49.
Capellmann, Herbert. „Later Criticism of the Copenhagen Interpretation“. In SpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology, 77–81. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61884-5_10.
Amesbury, Richard. „Norms, Interpretation, and Decision-Making: Derrida on Justice“. In Morality and Social Criticism, 46–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230507951_3.
Mallinson, Jane. „Objects of Attention: The Literary Criticism“. In T.S. Eliot’s Interpretation of F.H. Bradley, 23–34. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0411-3_3.
Gutiérrez Pozo, Antonio. „Subjectivity and Transcendence: Husserl’s Criticism of Naturalistic Thought“. In Man’s Self-Interpretation-in-Existence, 379–85. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1864-1_30.
Barrett, Michèle. „The Place of Aesthetics in Marxist Criticism“. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 697–713. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_48.
Davis, Todd F., und Kenneth Womack. „Introduction: Moving beyond the Politics of Interpretation“. In Formalist Criticism and Reader-Response Theory, 1–10. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1916-8_1.
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Xenophon Criticism and interpretation":
Al-dabbagh, Asma. „The Nature of Interpretation in Architectural criticism“. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING 2020. Cihan University-Erbil, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24086/aces2020/paper.256.
„Interpretation of "Wuthering Heights" from the Perspective of Eco-criticism“. In 2018 4th International Conference on Economics, Management and Humanities Science. Francis Academic Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.25236/ecomhs.2018.126.
Verner, Inna. „The legacy of Maximus the Greek in the biblical revision of Euthymius Chudovsky (1680s)“. In Tenth Rome Cyril-Methodian Readings. Indrik, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/91674-576-4.04.
Xu, Manyan. „A New Interpretation of Chinese Versions of Stray Birds Based on Reiss's Translation Criticism A Case Study of the Translations by Feng Tang and Zheng Zhenduo“. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies (CESSES 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/cesses-19.2019.128.
Aravot, Iris. „An Attempt at Making Urban Design Principles Explicit“. In 1995 ACSA International Conference. ACSA Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.35483/acsa.intl.1995.42.