Dissertationen zum Thema „Wheat Weed control“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-27 Dissertationen für die Forschung zum Thema "Wheat Weed control" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Dissertationen für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
Tickes, Barry R., und E. Stanley Heathman. „Wheat Weed Control, Yuma County“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/200519.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKopan, Suzanne. „Mechanical weed control in conservation tillage“. Online access for everyone, 2007. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Thesis/Spring2007/s_kopan_010207.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGaongalelwe, Motlhasedi Olebile. „Effect of delayed sowing and increased crop density on weed emergence and competition with wheat“. Title page, table of contents and abstract only, 2002. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09AFM/09afmg2118.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTickes, Barry R. „Canarygrass Control in Wheat“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/205161.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTickes, Barry. „Evaluation of Herbicides for Control of Littleseed Canarygrass in Wheat“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204102.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFrihauf, John Carl. „Weed control efficacy and winter wheat response to saflufenacil“. Diss., Manhattan, Kan. : Kansas State University, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/1603.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRefsell, Dawn E. „Integrated weed management in Kansas winter wheat“. Diss., Kansas State University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/15742.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDepartment of Agronomy
J. Anita Dille
Integrated weed management (IWM) is an ecological approach to weed control that reduces dependence on herbicides through understanding of weed biology and involves using multiple weed control measures including cultural, chemical, mechanical and biological methods. The critical period of weed control is the duration of the crop life cycle in which it must be kept weed-free to prevent yield loss from weed interference. Eight experiments were conducted throughout Kansas between October 2010 and June 2012 to identify this period in winter wheat grown under dryland and irrigated conditions. Impact of henbit and downy brome density on winter wheat yields were evaluated on four farmer’s fields with natural populations and on a research station with overseeded populations. Henbit density up to 156 plants m-2 did not affect winter wheat yield, while downy brome at a density of 40 plants m-2 reduced yield by 33 and 13% in 2011 and 2012, respectively. In the presence of downy brome, winter wheat should be kept weed-free approximately 30 to 45 days after planting to prevent yield loss; otherwise, weeds need to be removed immediately following release from winter dormancy to prevent yield loss due to existing weed populations. Flumioxazin and pyroxasulfone are herbicides registered for use in winter wheat, soybean and corn for control of broadleaf and grass weeds. Flumioxazin and pyroxasulfone were evaluated for plant response to localized herbicide exposure to roots, shoots, or both roots and shoots utilizing a novel technique. Two weed species, ivyleaf morningglory and shattercane, as well as two crops, wheat and soybean, were evaluated for injury after localized exposures. The location and expression of symptoms from the flumioxazin and pyroxasulfone herbicides were determined to be the shoot of seedling plants. The utilization of preemergence herbicides in winter wheat is not a common practice, although application may protect winter wheat from early season yield losses as determined by the critical weed-free period. Kansas wheat growers should evaluate the presence and density of weed species to determine which weed management strategy is most advantageous to preserving winter wheat yield.
Karim, S. M. Rezaul. „Competitive ability of four spring wheat varieties against fat hen (Chenopodium album L.)“. Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.300958.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOttman, Michael, und Barry Tickes. „Weed Control for Wheat and Barley in the Low Deserts of Arizona“. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/146707.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRevised
Weeds can be a problem in wheat and barley especially where crop rotation is not practiced. An integrated approach to weed management can be followed. Chemical treatments are important tools in weed management to maintain yield and quality and prevent proliferation of weeds that could affect future crops.
Bueno, Carmen de Lucas. „The role of cultivar choice for enhanced competitive ability of wheat“. Thesis, University of Reading, 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.308027.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMcCloskey, William B., und Stephen H. Husman. „Evaluation of Puma (Fenoxaprop) for Littleseed Canarygrass Control in Durum Wheat in Central Arizona (1998)“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/208280.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLee, Codee Zebedee. „Postemergence Efficacy of Pyroxasulfone at Different Rates and Timings in Wheat“. Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/29009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNorth Dakota State University. Department of Plant Sciences
Roslon, Ewa. „Relay cropping of spring barley and winter wheat /“. Uppsala : Dept. of Ecology and Crop Production Science, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, 2003. http://epsilon.slu.se/a427-ab.html.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFourie, Johan Hendrik Petrus. „'n Ondersoek na die ontstaan van onkruiddoderweerstand in Bromus diandrus Roth“. Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17354.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleENGLISH ABSTRACT: Ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus Roth.) is a weed that causes great problems in the most wheat and grain producing areas and also in livestock practices. Until recently (1995) there were no registered chemicals for the management of ripgut brome in wheat, in South Africa. After the registration of sulfosulfuron and iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron for the management of ripgut brome in wheat, these two herbicides were widely used and in the case of wheat monocultures, it was used repeatedly. During the last few years, reports of ripgut brome that were suspected to be resistant to these chemicals, increased. With the development of herbicide resistance it is of great importance to investigate methods to confirm resistance and also to control it. The goal of this study was firstly, to confirm resistance in ripgut brome and secondly to compare growth and development of resistant ripgut brome popualtions to that of susceptible ripgut brome populations. The dormancy of Bromus seed was also investigated as were effective methods to break seed dormancy. Lastly, quicker methods to confirm resistance were investigated. A short summary of the experiments follows. In the first experiment the degree of resistance of three different ripgut brome populations were determined, by using the pot spray method. One population each of B. pectinatus and B. rigidus were also included in the study. The seed of the Bromus populations were germinated after which it was planted in plastic pots and were placed in the glasshouse until the three to four leaf stage. Subsequently the plants were treated with the following four herbicides: sulfosulfuron, iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron, imazamox and haloxyfop-R methyl ester, at seven concentrations namely, the recommended dosage, one quarter, one half, twice, four times and eight times the recommended dosage. After six weeks the percentage survival and the dry mass of the plants were determined. Results showed that the three ripgut brome populations had different degrees of resistance to sulfosulfuron and iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron, varying from no resistance to moderate resistance to strong resistance. There was no resistance to imazamox and haloxyfop-R methyl ester. The B. rigidus population exhibited strong resistance or tolerance (natural resistance) to the two sulfonylureum herbicides. In the second experiment the seed of the same Bromus populations were germinated and planted in plastic pots that were filled with three litres of river sand to determine the growth, development and seed production of the plants. The number of leaves for each plant as well as the plant height were measured weekly, until the plants became reproductive. The two resistant populations grew much faster than the susceptible population and they also produced taller plants. The susceptible population produced more leaves, but seed production was delayed considerably. This probably relates more to the plant’s adaptation to their enviroment, than to adaptation due to resistance. The susceptible population was collected from a natural environment, while the others were collected from wheat fields. In the third experiment the seed dormancy of the Bromus populations was investigated. The effect of different treatments on the dormancy of the seed was also investigated. The treatments that were applied were gibberrellic acid, fumigation with ammonia gas and an ammonia treatment combined with a cold treatment. Seed dormancy in all populations was short-lived and the cold treatment was an effective way of stimulating fresh seed to germinate. The last experiment was performed to develop a quicker method for the evaluation of resistance in Bromus spp. In this experiment the petridish method was investigated. Only sulfosulfuron and iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron were used, because resistance to them was proven earlier. Different concentrations of the herbicides were applied to the dishes with the seed and were exposed to a cold treatment before being placed in a germination chamber. The seed in al the treatments germinated and it was decided to let the seed grow for two weeks in the petri dishes to observe whether the herbicides may have a detrimental effect on the growth of the small seedlings. After two weeks there were no differences between treatments and the experiment was terminated. The study showed that resistance is present in some of the Bromus populations and that there are biological differences between populations with different degrees of resistance. However, the fact that the susceptible population comes from a completely different environment than the other populations, complicate matters and further studies are required to obtain a clearer picture.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Predikantsluis (Bromus diandrus Roth.) is ‘n onkruid wat in die meeste koringen garsproduserende gebiede, asook in sommige vee praktyke, probleme veroorsaak. Tot redelik onlangs (ongeveer 1995) was daar in Suid-Afrika geen middels geregistreer wat predikantsluis in koring kon beheer nie. Nadat sulfosulfuron en iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron vir predikantsluisbeheer in koring geregistreer is, is die twee middels op groot skaal, en in die geval van koring monokultuurstelsels, aanhoudend toegedien. Gedurende die afgelope paar jaar is berigte ontvang dat beheer van predikantsluis met die middels nie meer so doeltreffend is nie, moontlik as gevolg van onkruiddoderweerstand wat ontwikkel het. Met die ontstaan van onkruiddoderweerstand is dit belangrik om praktyke en maniere te vind om weerstand vinniger te bevestig en doeltreffend te bestuur. Die doel van hierdie studie was eerstens om weerstand in predikantsluis te bevestig en tweedens om die groei en ontwikkeling van plante afkomstig van vermoedelike weerstandbiedende predikantsluis populasies te vergelyk met plante uit ‘n vatbare populasie. Die saadproduksie en dormansie van die saad is ook ondersoek asook effektiewe metodes om dormansie te breek. Laastens is ondersoek ingestel na ‘n vinniger manier (petribakkie metode) om weerstand te bevestig. Hieronder volg ‘n oorsig oor die vier eksperimente wat uitgevoer is. In die eerste proef is die mate van weerstand van drie verskillende predikantsluis populasies bepaal, deur van die gewone potspuit metode gebruik te maak. Daar is ook een populasie elk van Bromus pectinatus en vermoedelik Bromus rigidus ingesluit in die studie. Die sade van die verskillende populasies is toegelaat om te ontkiem en daarna is dit in plastiese potjies geplant en in ‘n glashuis geplaas totdat die drie tot vier blaarstadium bereik is. Die plante is daarna gespuit met die volgende vier middels: haloksifop-R-metielester (Gallant Super), imasamoks (Cysure), iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron (Cossack) en sulfosulfuron (Monitor), teen sewe konsentrasies elk, nl. teen die aanbevole dosis, asook teen een kwart van, een helfte van, twee keer, vier keer en agt keer die aanbevole dosis. Na ses weke is die persentasie oorlewendes en die droëmassa van die plante bepaal. Resultate het getoon dat die drie predikantsluis populasies verskillende grade van weerstand teen die twee sulfonielureums (sulfosulfuron en iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron) toon, dit wil sê van geen tot matig tot sterk weerstandbiedend. Daar is egter geen weerstand teen haloksifop-R-metielester (Gallant Super) en imasamoks (Cysure) waargeneem nie. Die B. rigidus populasie het sterk weerstand of toleransie (natuurlike weerstand) teen die sulfonielureum middels getoon. In die tweede proef is saad van dieselfde Bromus populasies ontkiem en oorgeplant in plastiese potte gevul met 3 liter riviersand om die groei en ontwikkeling en saadproduksie van die plante te evalueer. Die aantal blare per plant en hoogte van die plante is weekliks bepaal totdat die plante reproduktief geraak het. Hierna is die metings gestaak om te voorkom dat die saadproduksie van die plante benadeel word. Die resultate het getoon dat die twee weerstandbiedende predikantsluis populasies vinniger groei as die vatbare populasie en ook langer plante vorm, terwyl die vatbare populasie vinniger en meer blare vorm, maar langer neem om saad te vorm. Hierdie waarnemings hou egter waarskynlik meer verband met die oorsprong van die populasies as met die graad van weerstandbiedendheid. Die vatbare populasie is versamel in natuurlike veld vêr van enige landerye terwyl die ander populasies almal uit graanlande afkomstig is. In die derde proef is saaddormansie van die Bromus populasies ondersoek. Daar is ook ondersoek ingestel na verskillende behandelings om dormansie te breek. Die behandelings wat toegepas is, is ‘n gibberelienesuur behandeling teen verskillende konsentrasies, beroking met ammoniak vir verskillende tye en ‘n ammoniak behandeling tesame met ‘n koue behandeling. Die resultate het getoon dat saaddormansie van die Bromus populasies van korte duur is, maar dat kouebehandeling effektief is om ontkieming van vars saad te stimuleer. Die vierde proef is uitgevoer om vas te stel of daar vinniger evaluasiemetodes is vir die evaluasie van weerstand in Bromus spp., deur van die petribakkie metode gebruik te maak. In hierdie proef is slegs die middels iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron (Cossack) en sulfosulfuron (Monitor) gebruik, omdat daar ‘n mate van weerstand teen hulle waargeneem is in die eerste proef. Die middels is teen verskillende konsentrasies in petribakkies gevoeg, tesame met die sade en toe blootgestel aan ‘n kouebehandeling voordat dit in ‘n ontkiemingskabinet geplaas is vir ontkieming. Die sade in al die behandelings het ontkiem en daar is besluit om die saailinge uit die ontkiemingskabinet te haal en vir twee weke te laat groei sodat daar bepaal kon word of die middels ‘n effek op die groei van die plantjies het. Na twee weke kon geen verskil in die groei van die plantjies waargeneem word nie en die proef is beëindig. Die studie het getoon dat daar wel weerstand in sommige van die Bromus populasies voorkom, en dat biologiese verskille voorkom tussen predikantsluis populasies met verskillende grade van weerstand. Die feit dat die vatbare populasie uit ‘n heeltemaal verskillende omgewing kom as die ander populasies, maak definitiewe afleidings moeilik. Daar sal opvolgstudies uitgevoer moet word om van die onduidelikhede op te klaar.
Doole, Graeme John. „Value of perennial pasture phases in dryland agricultural systems of the eastern-central wheat belt of Western Australia“. University of Western Australia. School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2007. http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2007.0213.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOttman, Michael. „Small Grain Growth and Development“. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/147020.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBailey, William Anthony. „Herbicide-based Weed Management Systems for Potato (Solanum tuberosum) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Growth and Reproductive Characteristics of Smooth Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus)“. Diss., Virginia Tech, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/28578.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePh. D.
Tickes, Barry. „Preharvest control of broadleaf weeds in wheat“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/205404.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTickes, Barry. „Canarygrass Control in Wheat - 2003“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/205405.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTickes, Barry. „Evaluation of herbicides for control of littleseed canarygrass in wheat - 2004“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/203872.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTickes, B. „Evaluation of Herbicides for the Control of Littleseed Canarygrass in Wheat“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/205394.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTickes, Barry. „Evaluation of Herbicides for the Control of Littleseed Canarygrass in Wheat – 2005“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/203841.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRoschewitz, Indra. „Farming systems and landscape context effects on biodiversity and biocontrol /“. Doctoral thesis, [S.l. : s.n.], 2005. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=976217961.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGandhi, Harish Tulshiramji. „Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica Host) genetic diversity and hybridization with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)“. Thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1957/28764.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGraduation date: 2006
Ndou, Vuledzani Nico. „Chemical mutagenesis of wheat for herbicide resistance“. Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10413/10040.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThesis (M.Sc.Agric.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2012.
Leetch, Michael Scott. „Evaluation of chlorsulfuron for weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and its effect on subsequent recropping with soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) or grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)“. 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/27481.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWilcox, Douglas Howard. „Biology and control of Bromus pectinatus Thunb“. 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/3122.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMay 1986