Thematische Bibliographien / Ur excavations

Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Ur excavations“

Autor: Grafiati
Veröffentlicht am 25. Juli 2024
Zuletzt aktualisiert am 31. Juli 2024

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Ur excavations" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Ur excavations"

1

Salman Fahad, Sa’ad, und Raghad Abdul-Qadir Abbas. „Cuneiform Tablets from Shmet from the Excavation Season of 2001“. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 110, Nr. 1 (25.06.2020): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/za-2020-0001.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
AbstractIn 2001–2002, the Iraqi State Board of Antiquities and Heritage undertook excavations at the site of Shmet in the Umma region, thereby uncovering a large residential quarter. This article presents the first six cuneiform tablets from the first excavation season at the site, dating to the Presargonic and Ur III periods. The god names mentioned support the identification of Shmet with the ancient city of Ki.anki.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Molleson, Theya, und Dawn Hodgson. „The Human Remains from Woolley's Excavations at Ur“. Iraq 65 (2003): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4200535.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Cavigneaux, Antoine, und Emmert Clevenstine. „On the Periphery of the Clerical Community of Old Babylonian Ur“. Altorientalische Forschungen 50, Nr. 1 (01.06.2023): 33–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2023-0005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Abstract We offer transliterations, translations, and autograph copies of three Old Babylonian tablets held by the Musée d’Art et d’Histoire (MAH) in Geneva. MAH 15899 adds a new name to the roster of temple administrators in Ur, and leads us to propose a new interpretation of the year-name Rīm-Sîn IIa. MAH 16042 concerns a second son of the Uqqû first recognized in MAH 15896. MAH 15953 extends the family tree of the well-known Balamunamḫe of Larsa and connects the family with the religious life of the city. It probably postdates Samsu-iluna’s reconquest of Ur (Si 10) but it is difficult to say by how long. The witness lists of the tablets are intertwined with each other and with tablets from scientific excavations. These interrelationships reflect a common origin in Ur, and permit speculation about the location of the site from which they were plundered for the antiquities market.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Volpi, Luca. „THE ROYAL CEMETERY AT UR DURING THE SECOND HALF OF THE THIRD MILLENNIUM B.C.: POTTERY ANALYSIS THROUGH THE USE OF ARCHIVAL DATA, A CASE STUDY“. Iraq 82 (24.09.2020): 227–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/irq.2020.2.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The Royal Cemetery at Ur, with its almost two thousand graves, is one of the most impressive archaeological settings in southern Mesopotamia. Although most of the graves have been assigned to the Early Dynastic Period, more than three hundred graves have been dated to a timeframe from the Late Akkadian Period to the end of the third millennium B.C. However, the precise dating of many of these graves is under debate because stratigraphic data are often lacking, and the material culture used for dating has mainly been cylinder seals and other small finds. Due to the poor quality of the data published by Woolley, pottery has rarely been used to establish chronological determinants that could be useful in dating the graves. Thanks to the Ur Digitization Project, the field records from the Ur excavations are now available online. Among them are the Field Notes, which often contain pottery drawings, reproduced to scale. This paper re-analyses some of the graves in the Royal Cemetery at Ur that have been dated to the final part of the third millennium B.C. This analysis is based on a typological approach to the pottery assemblages that allows revised chronological determinants for dating selected grave contexts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Charpin, Dominique. „Priests of Ur in the Old Babylonian Period: a Reappraisal in Light of the 2017 Discoveries at Ur/Tell Muqayyar“. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions 19, Nr. 1-2 (10.12.2019): 18–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15692124-12341302.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Abstract Thirty-two years after the publication of Le Clergé d’Ur au siècle d’Hammurabi (1986), a reappraisal of the situation is made possible by collations of already known texts, and by new tablets provided by the resumption of excavations on the site of Tell Muqayyer. The question of the estate properties within the city of Ur will first be examined: generally, the members of the clergy owned the houses they inhabited, which were not the property of the temple of the Moon-god Nanna. Then the evidence about the specific situation of the purification priests devoted to the god Enki-of-Eridu will be studied: the older data are supplemented by new ones discovered in 2017 in a house occupied by a Babylonian general. Finally, the level of literacy of the clergy and the role they played in education will be examined; here again, the 2017 season provides new evidence thanks to the discovery of a house inhabited by an intendant of the temple of the goddess Ningal.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Al-Mutawalli, Nawala, Walther Sallaberger und Ali Ubeid Shalkham. „The Cuneiform Documents from the Iraqi Excavation at Drehem“. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 107, Nr. 2 (30.12.2017): 151–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/za-2017-0101.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Abstract: Drehem, ancient Puzriš-Dagān, is well known as the place of origin of more than 15,000 cuneiform tablets from the Ur III period that were sold on the antiquities markets from 1909 onwards. The State Board of Antiquities and Heritage of Iraq undertook the first controlled excavations at the site in 2007 under the direction of Ali Ubeid Shalkham. The cuneiform texts and fragments found there not only add to the well-known royal archives dealing with cattle, treasure or shoes, but they include many records on crafts and agriculture. With this evidence, the subsistence economy behind this important administrative center and royal palace of the Third Dynasty of Ur becomes more evident. We thank the Iraqi State Board of Antiquities and Heritage, the Iraq Museum Baghdad and Mr Ali Ubeid Shalkham for the permission to publish the tablets from the excavation season of 2007. The stays of Nawala Al-Mutawalli at LMU Munich in 2015 and 2016 in order to prepare this article were generously funded by the Gerda Henkel Stiftung. We are grateful to Margarete van Ess for the invitation to a first meeting in 2013 at the DAI Orientabteilung, Berlin. Thanks are owed to Manuel Molina for his careful reading of this article and his helpful remarks and Frans van Koppen for his editorial care. Walther Sallaberger’s work also contributes to his “Sumerisches Glossar” project. – All photos and plans of the excavation were made by Ali Ubeid Shalkham, the tablets in the Iraq Museum were photographed by Nawala Al-Mutawalli Mahmood. The abbreviations follow the Reallexikon für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie. The online digital resources CDLI (cdli.ucla.edu) and especially BDTNS (bdtns.filol.csic.es) have proven once more to be indispensable for our studies of lexicography and prosopography.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Pollock, Susan. „Of Priestesses, Princes and Poor Relations: The Dead in the Royal Cemetery of Ur“. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, Nr. 2 (Oktober 1991): 171–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0959774300000342.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Archaeological discoveries of dead individuals, usually in the form of burials, have frequently captured the imaginations of public and professional audiences alike. In addition to the allure of exotic artefacts and seemingly bizarre funeral rites, burials offer rich possibilities for investigating myriad aspects of past social, cultural and even individual life. This discussion focuses on one of the more renowned archaeological excavations of an ancient cemetery, the Royal Cemetery of Ur. Consideration of who was and who was not buried in the cemetery suggests that cemetery burial was the prerogative of those people who were closely attached to ‘public’ institutions. This leads to a number of observations on Sumerian treatment of the dead and attitudes toward death, as these can be approached from archaeological and textual sources.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Müller, Uwe. „Die eisenzeitliche Stratigraphie von Lidar Höyük“. Anatolian Studies 49 (Dezember 1999): 123–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3643067.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Lidar Höyük was situated on the east bank of the Euphrates river, about 50km northwest of the provincial capital Şanlıurfa and within sight of the mound of Samsat on the opposite bank. Since 1988 these sites have been flooded by the waters of the Atatürk Dam Basin. Excavations at Lidar Höyük took place in the years from 1979 to 1987. They were conducted by the Institute für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Vorderasiatische Archäologie of the University of Heidelberg under the direction of Hauptmann. The occupation levels reached from the Islamic down to the Chalcolithic Period. Iron Age structures were found mainly in a large trench called Q, R, S 44-45, where an unbroken stratigraphy from the 13th to the sixth century BC could be excavated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Jankowski, Alexei. „Pottery from Surveys and Excavations at Tell Dehaila-1 (2018–2021)“. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost, Nr. 6 (2023): 230. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s086919080025585-0.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Tell Dehaila-1 (EP-34 of Henry Wright’s survey) is located in Southern Iraq in the same natu-ral environment as the previously excavated sites of Eridu (26 km southeast), Ur (30 km east), and Tell Khaiber (17 km northeast), where it is one of the largest settlements of the Old Baby-lonian period (47 ha). Of the approximately 400 potsherds recorded during surveys and exca-vations at Tell Dehaila-1 by the Iraqi-Russian project in 2018–2021, the present study exam-ines only small and medium-sized forms, mainly bowls, cups and jugs, since these are the most chronologically and culturally diagnostic. The Tell Dehaila-1 assemblage generally corre-sponds to the Old Babylonian tradition, but has its own idiosyncrasies. It is not yet possible to determine whether these idiosyncrasies are chronologically driven or are the result of regional variation. The closest comparable assemblage is from Phase III (c. 1800–1600 BC) at Tell Yelkhi in the Hamrin. Stratigraphic and morphological considerations make us distinguish three periods of habitation in the excavated areas of Tell Dehaila-1: 1) the main Old Babyloni-an city; 2) a rather thin “tannur layer” with vessel forms that we tentatively interpret as post-crisis (early Sealand Period?); and 3) a 1st millennium BC presence (Neo-Babylonian), with-out any architectural remains within the excavated area, and apparently belonging to a non-urban settlement. Although the excavated areas in different parts of the tell are small, their ma-terial shows a unified picture, both morphologically and technologically, and surface finds do not contradict the conclusions drawn from the stratified ceramics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Campbell, Stuart, Jane Moon, Robert Killick, Daniel Calderbank, Eleanor Robson, Mary Shepperson und Fay Slater. „TELL KHAIBER: AN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE OF THE SEALAND PERIOD“. Iraq 79 (31.05.2017): 21–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/irq.2017.1.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Excavations at Tell Khaiber in southern Iraq by the Ur Region Archaeological Project have revealed a substantial building (hereafter the Public Building) dating to the mid-second millennium b.c. The results are significant for the light they shed on Babylonian provincial administration, particularly of food production, for revealing a previously unknown type of fortified monumental building, and for producing a dated archive, in context, of the little-understood Sealand Dynasty. The project also represents a return of British field archaeology to long-neglected Babylonia, in collaboration with Iraq's State Board for Antiquities and Heritage. Comments on the historical background and physical location of Tell Khaiber are followed by discussion of the form and function of the Public Building. Preliminary analysis of the associated archive provides insights into the social milieu of the time. Aspects of the material culture, including pottery, are also discussed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Mehr Quellen

Dissertationen zum Thema "Ur excavations"

1

MARIANI, ELEONORA. „Early Bronze IV Settlement Patterns and Material Culture in South Mesopotamia on the Basis of Excavations and Surveys. An Archaeo-historical Characterization of the Period between Early Bronze III (Early Dynastic III) and Middle Bronze I (Ur III)“. Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Pavia, 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1467652.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

MARIANI, ELEONORA. „Early Bronze IV Settlement Patterns and Material Culture in South Mesopotamia on the Basis of Excavations and Surveys. An Archaeo-historical Characterization of the Period between Early Bronze III (Early Dynastic III) and Middle Bronze I (Ur III)“. Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Pavia, 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1467651.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Millerman, Alison Jean. „The spinning of Ur : how Sir Leonard Woolley, James R. Ogden and the British Museum interpreted and represented the past to generate funding for the excavation of Ur in the 1920's and 1930's“. Thesis, University of Manchester, 2015. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/the-spinning-of-ur-how-sir-leonard-woolley-james-r-ogden-and-the-british-museum-interpreted-and-represented-the-past-to-generate-funding-for-the-excavation-of-ur-in-the-1920s-and-1930s(d9f0637d-a5a7-41cc-8eda-32646627010d).html.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This thesis examines the representation in both the public and academic arenas of the archaeological excavation at Ur, southern Iraq, during the 1920’s and 30’s through a study of the main characters involved. Sir Leonard Woolley’s excavation is still fundamental to our knowledge of archaeology in that region. Current thought criticises his approach to and interpretation of his work, as having been “Bible driven” and of little scientific validity, but ignores the value of understanding the relationship between the excavator and the wider community from which his funding derived. Drawing on the Ogden archive, this study is our first opportunity to examine how knowledge about the Ur excavations was disseminated, how the archaeological past has been created and used, and how these interpretations presented entered the zeitgeist and still resonate today. As a result of my initial research findings, I gained access to the family archives of the goldsmith James Ogden, a substantial but previously unresearched body of material that provides an almost complete photographic record of the inter-war archaeology in this region as well as a comprehensive record of press coverage and public reaction. It also contains many unpublished letters between those involved at the time, explaining their methods and motivations. This archive complements substantial quantities of unstudied material in other archives of museums and learned societies. Taken together, the archival material provides a fuller understanding of the motivations behind a highly choreographed publicity campaign that successfully enabled the excavation to continue when threatened by inter-war financial shortages. This research elicits an understanding of the social, cultural and economic factors that shaped archaeology in a society that was uneasily assimilating the impact of the new sciences on a still largely Bible reading public. I analyse all the archives in the wider context of the role played by this campaign in shaping contemporary knowledge of the archaeology of Iraq, as well as reflecting inter-war British and Iraqi society. Archaeological activity was being conducted against the dramatically changing backdrop of the Near East after the First World War, the emergence of the nation states of the area, and a growing aggression and hostility to western occupation. The traditional imperialist view of the right to possession of the excavated antiquities was being challenged as the power structure in the region began to shift and new regional identities were forged.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Bücher zum Thema "Ur excavations"

1

Lunz, Reimo. Ur- und Frühgeschichte des Brixner Raumes. Bruneck: R. Lunz, 1994.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Arno, Heinrich, Krause Elmar-Björn, Mecke Birgit, Carls-Müller Elsbeth und Historische Gesellschaft Bottrop (Germany), Hrsg. Ur-Geschichte im Ruhrgebiet: Festschrift Arno Heinrich. Gelsenkirchen: Edition Agora, 1992.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Bernhard, Gramsch, und Museum für Ur- und Frühgeschichte Potsdam., Hrsg. Veröffentlichungen des Museums für Ur- und Frühgeschichte Potsdam. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1987.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Lunz, Reimo. Ur- und Frühgeschichte des Eppaner Raumes. Eppan: Gemeinde Eppan, 1990.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Heine, Hans-Wilhelm. Die Ur- und Frühgeschichtlichen Burgwälle im Regierungsbezirk Hannover. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung, 2000.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Berg, Axel von. Ur- und Frühgeschichte an Mittelrhein und Mosel: Ein Überblick. Koblenz: Verein für Geschichte und Kunst des Mittelrheins zu Koblenz, 1990.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Achner, Heike. Ur- und frühgeschichtliche Funde des Braunschweigischen Landesmuseums aus Sachsen-Anhalt. Braunschweig: Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum, 1994.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Hodel, Corinne. Archäologie des Oberaargaus: Ur- und Frühgeschichte, 13000 v.Chr. bis 700 n.Chr. [Herzogenbuchsee]: Jahrbuch-Vereinigung des Oberaargaus, 2011.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Binding, Ulrike. Archäologie an der Leine: Ur- und frühgeschichtliche Funde aus Hannover und Umgebung. Oldenburg: Isensee, 1991.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Lippert, Andreas. Der Götschenberg bei Bischofshofen: Eine ur- und frühgeschichtliche Höhensiedlung im Salzachpongau. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1992.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Mehr Quellen

Buchteile zum Thema "Ur excavations"

1

Zettler, Richard L. „Woolley’s Excavations at Ur:“. In Ur in the Twenty-First Century CE, 7–34. Penn State University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv1g80954.7.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Stone, Elizabeth C., Paul Zimansky, Katheryn Twiss, Michael Charles und Melina Seabrook. „New Excavations at Ur“. In Ur in the Twenty-First Century CE, 475–84. Penn State University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv1g80954.35.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Werr, Lamia Al-Gailani. „Gertrude Bell in the Archive of the Iraq Museum“. In Gertrude Bell and Iraq, herausgegeben von Paul Collins und Charles Tripp. British Academy, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266076.003.0012.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
It is unfortunate that most of what is written and researched on Gertrude Bell tends to give a scant or short account of her work on the Antiquities Department. Most of the documents on her work in the last four years of her life are in the Iraq Museum (1922–1926), and were, until recently, not accessible to the public. This chapter explores the surviving documents to give a picture of the main issues that occupied Bell during this period – from her constant search for a place to store the deluge of artefacts coming from excavations such as Ur and Kish to the legislation of the Antiquities Law. Bell’s legacy for the antiquities of Iraq is as important as the creation of Iraq.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

McGeough, Kevin M., und Elizabeth A. Galway. „Excavating Ur in Children’s Literature“. In Ur in the Twenty-First Century CE, 315–28. Penn State University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv1g80954.26.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Harding, Dennis. „Documentary Sources“. In Iron Age Hillforts in Britain and Beyond. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199695249.003.0013.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Prehistorians like to think of prehistoric archaeology as the ‘purest’ branch of the discipline, in that interpretation and reconstruction of prehistoric societies is solely dependent upon the principles and techniques of archaeology, untainted by the predisposition of history. The unfortunate polarization of attitudes was only too evident at a recent International Congress of Celtic Studies, at which some younger archaeologists were utterly dismissive of any argument that was based upon classical sources, an intolerance that was only comprehensible in the face of the equally irrational faith placed in these sources, irrespective of context or chronology, by some of their senior colleagues. This kind of uncritical use of texts doubtless underlies Hill's (1989) exhortation that Iron Age archaeological studies should become more like the Neolithic. For others, the present writer included, the challenge of the Iron Age derives largely from the fact that it does span the threshold of history, and that Britain and Europe are therefore populated by named individuals and known communities, not just by inanimate pots and stone artefacts. The age of hillforts is substantially protohistoric, though Christopher Hawkes’ (1954) term parahistoric is probably more accurate for much of the British Iron Age, for which the relevant texts derive from literate neighbours rather than from even a minority literate group among the native community. Archaeologists since Hawkes have sometimes talked about such periods as text-aided, as opposed to prehistoric periods that were text-free. It may be arguable whether the presence of textual sources is an aid or a complication, but the phrase text-free implies a measure of relief that for these periods at least the archaeologist is free to interpret the evidence uninhibited by possible contradiction from historical records. The problem with text-aided archaeology, of course, was that it tended to be text-led; that is, that archaeology was seen as a means of ‘proving’ or at least illuminating history. The subordination of archaeology to history that was implicit in this approach is well illustrated by the way that Sir Leonard Woolley's excavations at Ur were popularly heralded as proving the flood of Genesis, or Kathleen Kenyon's excavations at Jericho were presented as discovering the walls destroyed by Joshua, notwithstanding the fact that the Neolithic town with which she was primarily concerned pre-dated Iron Age Joshua by several millennia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Ezer, Sabahattin. „Kültepe-Kanesh in the Early Bronze Age“. In Current Research at Kultepe-Kanesh, 5–23. Lockwood Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5913/2014192.ch01.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
During the excavations of Kültepe conducted by prof. tahsin Özgüç and, from 2006, by prof. Fikri Kulakoğlu, eighteen ancient occupation levels were uncovered. The early Bronze age (eBa) periods at Kültepe are represented by levels 11–18 and prove that the site was an important and influential regional center in the third millennium BCe. level 18 has been identified in a small area and belongs to the early Bronze age i (hereafter eBa i). Finds from the early Bronze age ii levels (hereafter eBa ii), found in levels 14–17, show that Kültepe had close relations to Mesopotamia, northern syria and Cilicia during that period. Compared to the early phases of eBa ii, the pottery from the later phase is more abundant and demonstrates characteristics of the north euphrates region. levels 11–13 belong to the early Bronze age iii (eBa iii) and have prominent monumental architecture. The presence of depas and tankard-type vessels is important as it shows not only re- lations between Kültepe and western anatolia but also between Kültepe and regions in the south. Monumental buildings unearthed in three different levels of the eBa iii in Kültepe are quite different from its anatolian contemporaries both in scale and plan. This architecture shows that Kültepe was an important center not only in second, but also in third millennium BCe. archaeological evidence obtained in these layers is important as it shows not only the cultural characteristics of Kültepe, but also the interregional relations taking in a vast area from Ur in south to the aegean islands in the west, as well as neighboring regions closer to Kültepe.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

„3. Contents, Dates and Excavation Campaigns of the UET Texts“. In The Administrative and Economic Ur III Texts from the City of Ur, 37–90. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Gorgias Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.31826/9781463209209-006.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

„CHAP. III. RETURN TO MOSUL. — ISMAIL PASHA. CHANGE IN THE STATE OP THE COUNTRY. RETURN TO NIMROUD. THE RUINS IN SPRING. — EXCAVATIONS RESUMED. — FURTHER DISCOVERIES. — NEW INTERRUPTIONS. SHEIKH ABD-UR-RAHMAN AND THE ABOU SALMAN ARABS FRESH BAS-RELIEFS IN THE NORTH-WEST CORNER.—DISCOVERY OF THE PRINCIPAL PALACE. ENTIRE BASRELIEFS.— DISCOVERY OF THE GIGANTIC LIONS. — SURPRISE OF THE ARABS SENSATION AT MOSUL, AND CONDUCT OF THE PASHA AND CADI. EXCAVATIONS STOPPED. FURTHER DISCOVERIES.— DESCRIPTION OF THE HUMAN-HEADED LIONS.—REFLECTIONS ON THEIR ANTIQUITY AND OBJECT. — THE JEBOUR ARABS. THEIR SHEIKHS. A KURDISH CHIEF. NIMROUD IN MARCH. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAIN AT SUNSET. THE TUNNEL OF NEGOUB. — AN ASSYRIAN INSCRIPTION“. In Nineveh and Its Remains, 51–81. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Gorgias Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.31826/9781463209902-007.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Die Auswahlen zum Thema "Ur excavations" für konkrete Quellenarten können Sie auch interessieren:
Zeitschriftenartikel Bücher
Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!

Zur Bibliographie