Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Tok Nohoe“

[For the English abstract and full text of the article please see the attached PDF-File (English version follows Russian version)].ABSTRACT The authors justify the use of system engineering approach to evaluation and tasks of improvement of railway line operational reliability. Particular emphasis is placed on interdependence of infrastructure capacity and overall operational readiness of the system «railway» in terms of compliance with criteria adopted in the theory of reliability. An own interpretation of the concept of «operational safety» and factors of maintenance of track in working order is given, as well as regularity in local situations, preventive and remedial actions are suggested. Keywords: railway, infrastructure, operational reliability, track maintenance, transit capacity, system engineering, reliability theory. REFERENCES 1.System engineering of construction: Encyclopedic Dictionary [Sistemotehnika stroitel’stva: Enciklopedicheskij slovar’].Ed.by A. A.Gusakov.Moscow, Novoe tysjacheletie publ., 1999, 432 p. 2.Gusakov, A. A.System engineering of construction [Sistemotehnika stroitel’stva].Moscow, Stroyizdat publ., 1993, 366 p. 3.Zavadskas, E-K.K.System engineering assessment of technological solutions of building production [Sistemotehnicheskaja ocenka tehnologicheskih reshenij stroitel’nogo proizvodstva].Leningrad, Stroyizdat publ., 1991, 256 p. 4.Shepitko, T.V., Morozov, D. V.Using network modeling to determine reliability of decisions.«Science Week 2002» [Ispol’zovanie setevogo modelirovanija dlja opredelenija nadezhnosti prinimaemyh reshenij. «Nedelja nauki 2002»].Moscow, MIIT publ., 2002. 5.Shepitko, T.V., Morozov, D. V.On system engineering nature of reliability problem of organizational and technological solution [O sistemotehnicheskom haraktere problemy nadezhnosti organizacionno-tehnologicheskogo reshenija].Traffic safety: proceedings of the fourth scientific and practical conference.Moscow, MIIT publ., 2003, pp.III-33. 6.Berg, A. I.Cybernetics and reliability [Kibernetika i nadezhnost’].Moscow, Znanie publ., 1964, 96 p. 7.Reliability of technical systems: Reference book [Nadezhnost’ tehnicheskih sistem: Spravochnik].Yu.K.Belyaev, V. A.Bogatyrev, V. V.Bolotin, et al; ed.by I. A.Ushakov.Moscow, Radio i svjaz’ publ., 1985, 608 p. 8.Benson, D., Whitehead, G.Transport and distribution [Transport i dostavka gruzov: Transl. from English].Moscow, Transport publ., 1990, 279 p. 9.Newell, M.Project Management [Upravlenie proektami. Transl. from English].Moscow, Kudic-Obraz, 2006, 416 p. 10.Littlefield, T.K., Randolph, P. H.An Answer to Sasieni’s Question on Pert Times.Management Science, Vol.33, No.10, 1987, pp.1357-1359. 11.Chertvertnova, V. V.System analysis of operational reliability of extended transport objects [Sistemnyj analiz ekspluatacionnoj nadezhnosti protjazhennyh transportnyh ob’ektov].Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, 2007, Iss.2, pp.419-424. 12.GOST 32192-2013.Reliability in railway engineering.Basic concepts.Terms and definitions [GOST 32192-2013. Nadezhnost’ v zheleznodorozhnoj tehnike. Osnovnye ponjatija. Terminy i opredelenija]. 13.GOST 27.004-85.Reliability in engineering: technological systems, terms and definitions [GOST 27.004-85. Nadezhnost’ v tehnike: sistemy tehnologicheskie, terminy i opredelenija]. 14.GOST 27.003-90.Reliability in engineering.Composition and common rules on reliability requirements [GOST 27.003-90. Nadezhnost’ v tehnike. Sostav i obshhie pravila zadanija trebovanij po nadezhnosti]. 15.GOST 27.310-95.Reliability in engineering.Analysis of types, effects and criticality of failures.Main provisions [GOST 27.310-95. Nadezhnost’ v tehnike. Analiz vidov, posledstvij i kritichnosti otkazov. Osnovnye polozhenija]. 16.GOST 27.402-95.Reliability in engineering.Test plans to monitor the mean service hours to failure [GOST 27.402-95. Nadezhnost’ v tehnike. Plany ispytanij dlja kontrolja srednej narabotki do otkaza (na otkaz)]. 17.Spiridonov, E.S., Shepitko, T. V.Railway construction management - methods, principles, efficiency: textbook [Upravlenie zheleznodorozhnym stroitel’stvom - metody, principy, effektivnost’: Uchebnik].Moscow, TMC for education on railway transport, 2008, 597 p. 18.Kubrak, A. A.Operational reliability of passenger stations.World of Transport and Transportation, Vol.12, 2014, Iss.4, pp.60-65.

The article deals with publications related to the name of Sergey Esenin, which appeared on the pages of the Russian emigrant newspaper “Novoe Russkoye Slovo” (New York) in 1941. The focus is on Alexander Kurilovich’s essay “Sergey Esenin (On the Fifteenth Anniversary of His Death)”, which became one of the notable milestones of Eseniniana in the USA. The author of the article also analyzes the notes and essays of V. Levin, V. Mansvetov, M. Stotsky, D. Opalov and others. It is shown how assessments of Esenin’s life and work in emigration change in the year of the German attack on the USSR.

The article includes the examples that refl ect the life and creative activity of the prominent representatives of Russian literature during the Second World War. Among them are I.D. Surguchyov, Don-Aminado (A.P. Shpolyansky), general P.N. Krasnov, G.V. Ivanov, N.A. Taffy, M.A. Osorgin, D.S. Merezhkovsky, Z.N. Gippius, I.A. Bunin, I.S. Shmelyov, B.K. Zaitsev and others. The article notes that the Second World War exposed many contradictions hidden in peacetime. Some of the Émigré writers collaborated with the Nazis and took part in “Parizhsky Vestnik” and in “Novoe Slovo” (Berlin) newspapers published with the support of the Nazis. They considered Germany’s war against the USSR as a historical campaign against Bolshevism and the only opportunity in recent conditions to destroy it. The author of the article analyzes V.I. Goryansky’s satirical poems on the pages of the “Parizhsky Vestnik” for the fi rst time: namely “The Cheerful Churchill,” “Spring Tornado” and other publications. The article demonstrates the participation of the representatives of the Russian Émigré literature in fi ght against fascism and in the Résistance Movement. These examples show that the majority of the Russian Émigré writers retained patriotic feelings towards the abandoned homeland and did not support Hitler’s aggressive plans.