Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Theory of Organizational Change“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Theory of Organizational Change" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Theory of Organizational Change"
Janicijevic, Nebojsa. „Organizational learning in the theory of organizational change“. Ekonomski anali 51, Nr. 171 (2006): 7–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/eka0671007j.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDONALDSON, L. „ORGANIZATIONAL PORTFOLIO THEORY: PERFORMANCE-DRIVEN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE“. Contemporary Economic Policy 18, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2000): 386–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2000.tb00035.x.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHage, Jerald, und Kurt Finsterbusch. „Three Strategies of Organizational Change: Organizational Development, Organizational Theory and Organizational Design“. International Review of Administrative Sciences 55, Nr. 1 (März 1989): 29–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002085238905500105.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleJ. Adriaenssen, Daniel, und Jon-Arild Johannessen. „Prospect theory as an explanation for resistance to organizational change: some management implications“. Problems and Perspectives in Management 14, Nr. 2 (11.05.2016): 84–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.14(2).2016.09.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSternberg, Robert J. „Effecting organizational change: A "mineralogical" theory of organizational modifiability.“ Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 54, Nr. 3 (2002): 147–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.54.3.147.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFrahm, Jennifer A., und Kerry A. Brown. „BUILDING AN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE COMMUNICATION THEORY.“ Academy of Management Proceedings 2005, Nr. 1 (August 2005): C1—C6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2005.18781296.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleYong Sun Chang. „Organizational Change: Focusing on Congruence Theory“. Korean Review of Organizational Studies 9, Nr. 3 (Dezember 2012): 95–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.21484/kros.2012.9.3.95.
Der volle Inhalt der Quellevan den Oord, Ad, Karen Elliott, Arjen van Witteloostuijn, Melody Barlage, Laszlo Polos und Sofie Rogiest. „A cognitive organization theory (COT) of organizational change“. Journal of Organizational Change Management 30, Nr. 6 (02.10.2017): 903–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jocm-08-2016-0164.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAbel, Charles F., und Arthur J. Sementelli. „Evolutionary critical theory, metaphor, and organizational change“. Journal of Management Development 24, Nr. 5 (Juni 2005): 443–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621710510598454.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGRANT, DAVID, und ROBERT J. MARSHAK. „A DISCOURSE-BASED THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE.“ Academy of Management Proceedings 2009, Nr. 1 (August 2009): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2009.44243469.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Theory of Organizational Change"
Jumara, John J. Sturgeon James I. „A case study of the influence of organization theory on organizational change“. Diss., UMK access, 2005.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden"A dissertation in economics and social science." Advisor: James I. Sturgeon. Typescript. Vita. Title from "catalog record" of the print edition Description based on contents viewed March 12, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 137-149). Online version of the print edition.
Murphy, Lee P. „Influencing Successful Organizational Change Through Improving Individual and Organizational Dimensions of Health“. Thesis, Benedictine University, 2014. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3583435.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIn both academic and management literature it has been often stated that 70% of change efforts are not successful (Kotter, 1995; Smith, 2002). And while this failure rate may not be empirically tested, it points to a reality that most change efforts are not only difficult, but they are often unsuccessful (Hughes, 2011). When an organization undergoes a major organizational change process, the expected impacts include increased employee stress and overall productivity dips in the midst of the change (Dahl, 2011; Elrod II & Tippett, 2002). Measuring the impacts of change on employees and on organizational effectiveness during the change can add value and help increase the chances for change initiative success by allowing necessary adjustments and identifying and leveraging additional business improvement predictors along the way.
In this dissertation, I answer the question “What is the impact of going through a major organizational change on business outcomes and employee and organizational health?” My results suggest that an organization can transform the expected negative effects of a major change effort to positive effects by focusing on three things: 1) Improving employee mental health; 2) Increasing positive practices, including leadership’s impact on the organization; and 3) Improving employee involvement, communication, and teamwork. Finally, the results also show that improved employee mental health and improved positive practices are significantly related to improved business outcomes. Organizational change outcomes can be successfully informed by linking business outcomes with change impact measures.
Unger, Cai. „Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis“. Thesis, University of South Alabama, 2017. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10643261.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe field of Organizational Change has seen a proliferation of publications of all sorts over the past two decades. In view of the emerging breadth of the field, it is becoming increasingly difficult for practitioners and researchers alike to separate the wheat from the chaff. At the same time, research suggests the majority of Organizational Change efforts are not successful. It is therefore my intent to map the nomological structure of the field of Organizational Change, determine the most dominating concepts, and identify any patterns or trends.
For that purpose I have collected bibliometric data from 1948 to 2016 and conduct a network analysis based on co-occurrence of keywords of Organizational Change.
My network analysis suggests five major findings. First, the field of Organizational Change has reached a level of maturity, which reduces the likelihood of breakthrough innovations. Second, only five concepts are dominating the field of Organizational Change today, which I label the “Top Five”: Change management, leadership, organizational culture, organizational learning, and innovation. Third, we are barking up the wrong tree, which means there is an inherent inconsistency between the topicality of the field, i.e. the dominance of very few topics, and the low success rate of Organizational Change projects. Fourth, it is still unclear how to exactly define and reliably measure change. Finally fifth, there seems to be too much focus on the paradigm that change is always preferably over an equilibrium.
I therefore propose three suggestions for further research. First, look beyond the Top Five concepts and create more dissonant discussion within the field, including a critical review of established paradigms. Second, revisit the established definitions and measurements of change, which includes questioning the widespread assumption that the majority of change efforts are failing. Finally third, conduct a network analysis based on a network of social actors of the field of organizational change, i.e. authors of organizational change.
Brown, Steven Armenakis Achilles A. „Technology acceptance and organizational change an integration of theory /“. Auburn, Ala., 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10415/1991.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNajrani, Majed. „The effect of change capability, learning capability and shared leadership on organizational agility“. Thesis, Pepperdine University, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10141724.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOrganizational agility represents a new field of organizational study that is not well examined. In the past organizations had an unmatched competitive advantage due to low competition and higher barriers to entry into their markets. As a result, many organizations dominated their industries. However, in the era of globalization, individuals with an internet connection and the right skills can start new organizations that can compete on a global level. Consequently, organizations now are facing more competition that they experienced in the past. Another reason for increase competition is new technology. Technology is improving increasingly faster than any time in history. Therefore, organizations that are not agile could not survive in the current environment.
Agile entities realize that they have to become flexible and nimble to withstand competition. Accordingly, the researcher in this study proposes an organizational agility model and this proposed model is the focus of the study. The proposed model significant arises from the fact that currently there are limited numbers of models that help organizations in becoming agile entities. The characteristics in this study were based on Worley and Lawler (2010) “Agility and Organization Design: A Diagnostic Framework”. The study conducted a survey utilizing an instrument developed by Dr. Worley and Dr. Lawler that contains 15 agility characteristics. The survey uses all 15 characteristics to determine if the organization is agile. In addition, the study utilizes three of the 15 agility characteristics to determent if a relationship occurs between the study variables.
This quantitative study examined the relationship between change capability, learning capability, shared leadership and organizational agility. Moreover, understanding these relationships could assist scholars and practitioners in producing change programs that emphasize certain behaviors that make an organization agile. The study surveyed 116 participants and found that focusing on change capability, learning capability and shared leadership could contribute in creating agile organizations. Consequently, after evaluating the study results, a new agility model emerged. This model shows that organizations can achieve agility by developing change capability, learning capability, shared leadership, shared purpose and flexible resources. Ultimately, achieving agility could help organizations compete and endure now and the future.
Ishiyama, Howard Jiro. „Incremental change, turnaround, and transformation : toward a theory of public organizational change“. Connect to resource, 1996. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view.cgi?acc%5Fnum=osu1266934745.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKoller, Ronald J. „The nonlinear relationship of individual commitment to organizational change and behavioral support“. Thesis, Capella University, 2014. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3645169.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis study examined the relationships between affective commitment to change (desire), normative commitment to change (obligation), and continuance commitment to change (cost), as predictors of behavioral support for change. Affective commitment to change and normative commitment to change both demonstrated curvilinear relationships with behavioral support. Continuance commitment to change did not. This study also used residualized relative importance analyses, techniques for a full decomposition of the variance in nonlinear regression models. The nonlinear models accounted for more of a change in variance than did the linear regression models. The discussion section includes a scatterplot diagram intended to bridge the gap between scholars and practitioners in that the figure illustrates a range of resistant to commitment behaviors that cause organizational change initiatives to fail. The conclusion provides recommendations for researchers regarding the inclusion of a nonlinear frame when designing organizational change studies, and recommendations for practitioners regarding the damage that compliance is responsible for in organizational change initiatives.
Keywords: commitment to change, resistance to change, organizational change
Chavez, Elisa. „The change equation| A correlation study of status quo bias in managers“. Thesis, University of Phoenix, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10017972.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe purpose of the research study was to predict managerial resistance to status quo bias given the presence of dissatisfaction, vision, and a process outlined for change in the environment. According to the 79 participants surveyed in the study, dissatisfaction, vision, and a process outlined for change provided a statistically significant model for predicting manager resistance to status quo bias for the sample studied. Leaders may be able to use the results of the study to determine manager readiness for change. However, at best the study found only 45.3% of the reasons that predict managerial resistance to status quo bias, providing an opportunity for future researchers to validate empirically other factors that may predict manager resistance to status quo bias.
Herbert, Stacie Lynn. „A comprehensive literature review and critical anaylsis of servant leadership theory“. Menomonie, WI : University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2005. http://www.uwstout.edu/lib/thesis/2005/2005herberts.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKautenberger, John. „Key descriptors of successful change leaders in Mergers and Acquisitions“. Thesis, University of Phoenix, 2015. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3736717.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLeadership found the best form of communication and behaviors challenging and elusive during all phases of Merger and Acquisitions, (M&A). The majority of M&A resulted in lower than expected shareholder value as measured by yearly profits. A qualitative Delphi design was used to identify the key descriptors of leadership communication and behaviors witnessed that influenced motivation, morale, and productivity during mergers and acquisitions. The participants engaged by email in two rounds of behavior and communication key descriptor creation, and a telephonic interview that presented the witnessed M&A. The 25 participants were experts because of their knowledge of the PLM and software industry, knowledge of the industry’s history of mergers and acquisitions, and witnessed leadership communication and behavior during merger and acquisitions. In addition, the majority of the participants experienced multiple mergers and acquisitions under change leaders. This positioned the participants as experts that identified the successful leadership communication and behavior in a merger and acquisition. The Delphi results introduced the criticality in regard to knowledge in the art of leadership regarding adaptability to change and appropriate application of communication and behaviors during M&A. NVivo 10 a qualitative analysis tool helped produce organization, and broader meaning to the key descriptors. Once the key descriptors were categorized as leadership qualities, behaviors, and processes themes were extracted from the collected data that produced consensus in regard to best communication and behaviors, which positively influenced motivation, morale, and productivity of employees.
Bücher zum Thema "Theory of Organizational Change"
Jones, Gareth R. Organizational theory, design, and change. 7. Aufl. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2013.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenJones, Gareth R. Organizational theory, design, and change. 6. Aufl. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2010.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenFossum, Lynn B. Understanding organizational change: Converting theory to practice. Los Altos, Calif: Crisp Publications, 1989.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenImplementing organizational change: Theory into practice. 2. Aufl. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenOrganization change: Theory and practice. 2. Aufl. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2008.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenPerspectives on organization theory. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Pub. Co., 1987.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenTonder, C. L. Van. Organisational change: Theory and practice. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 2004.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenJohn, Hayes. The theory and practice of change management. 3. Aufl. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenArie, Shirom, Hrsg. Organizational diagnosis and assessment: Bridging theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1999.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSally, Hulks, und Wiggins Liz, Hrsg. Organizational change: Perspectives on theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "Theory of Organizational Change"
Cox, Raymond W. „Organizational Dynamics and Change“. In Public Administration in Theory and Practice, 174–99. Third edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351003940-11.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMackenzie, Kenneth D. „Overview of the Theory of the Organizational Hologram“. In The Organizational Hologram: The Effective Management of Organizational Change, 47–70. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3917-5_3.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleClancey, William J. „Practice Cannot be Reduced to Theory: Knowledge, Representations, and Change in the Workplace“. In Organizational Learning and Technological Change, 16–46. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79550-3_2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRamage, Magnus. „Schön, Donald: Learning and Change in His Work – Reflection on Theory and Theory on Reflection“. In The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 1–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_57-2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRamage, Magnus. „Schön, Donald: Learning and Change in His Work – Reflection on Theory and Theory on Reflection“. In The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 1541–55. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38324-4_57.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRamage, Magnus. „Learning and Change in the Work of Donald Schön: Reflection on Theory and Theory on Reflection“. In The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 1159–72. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52878-6_57.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRamage, Magnus. „Learning and Change in the Work of Donald Schön: Reflection on Theory and Theory on Reflection“. In The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 1–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_57-1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHughes, Mark. „Raymond Caldwell: Agency and Change in Organizational Theory“. In The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 249–67. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52878-6_70.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHughes, Mark. „Raymond Caldwell: Agency and Change in Organizational Theory“. In The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 1–19. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_70-1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHughes, Mark. „Caldwell, Raymond: Agency and Change in Organizational Theory“. In The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 1–21. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_70-2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKonferenzberichte zum Thema "Theory of Organizational Change"
Lovrenčić, Sandra. „Knowledge Management as a Facilitator of Organizational Change“. In Values, Competencies and Changes in Organizations. University of Maribor Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-442-2.82.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHagerer, Ilse, und Uwe Hoppe. „German Universities as Actors in Organizational Design – A Qualitative Study“. In Fifth International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/head19.2019.9333.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnđelković, Maja, Marjan Marjanović und Michail Pappas. „Organizational Socialization as Part of Knowledge Management“. In Values, Competencies and Changes in Organizations. University of Maribor Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-442-2.1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGeorge Saadé, Raafat, und James Wan. „Proposing an Integrated Change Management Model for the United Nations“. In InSITE 2017: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences: Vietnam. Informing Science Institute, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/3776.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMa, Chihmin, Mingsheng Liu und Yaonan Zuo. „Organizational Change, Uncertainty and Employee Intentions: Based on the Perspective of Theory of Planned Behavior“. In ICMSS 2021: 2021 the 5the International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3459012.3459034.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHagerer, Ilse. „How academic reforms change the organizational design of universities“. In HEAd'16 - International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/head16.2016.2825.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleJednak, Sandra. „Adapting Business to Sustainable Development and New Technology“. In Values, Competencies and Changes in Organizations. University of Maribor Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-442-2.81.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWattie, J. „Reducing Latent Failure and Securing Productivity in High Risk Systems Using High Reliability Theory“. In SPE Energy Resources Conference. SPE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/spe-169932-ms.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRibič, Timotej, und Miha Marič. „LMX – teorija odnosa med vodjo in zaposlenim“. In Values, Competencies and Changes in Organizations. University of Maribor Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-442-2.58.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIndihar Stemberger, Mojca, Andrej Kovacic und Jurij Jaklic. „A Methodology for Increasing Business Process Maturity in Public Sector“. In InSITE 2007: Informing Science + IT Education Conference. Informing Science Institute, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/3156.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBerichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Theory of Organizational Change"
Greenan, Nathalie, und Jacques Mairesse. Organizational Change in French Manufacturing: What Do We Learn From Firm Representatives and From Their Employees? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w7285.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMcKnight, Katherine, und Elizabeth Glennie. Are You Ready for This? Preparing for School Change by Assessing Readiness. RTI Press, März 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2019.pb.0020.1903.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCaliendo, Lorenzo, Ferdinando Monte und Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Exporting and Organizational Change. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Juli 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23630.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBlunck, Paula. Perceived Communication During Organizational Change. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.6602.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHenderson, Rebecca, und Sarah Kaplan. Inertia and Incentives: Bridging Organizational Economics and Organizational Theory. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Dezember 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w11849.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleEdwards, Dominick L. Spouse Influence in Army Organizational Change. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, Januar 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada505495.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCarlson, Scott M. Defeat: A Motivation for Organizational Change? Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, März 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada468391.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTeister, Keith J. Organizational Change for the United States Armed Forces. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, Mai 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada435834.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMurrell, Emily. Organizational Culture Change Resulting From Human Resources Outsourcing. Portland State University Library, Januar 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/honors.144.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCullen-Lester, Kristin, und Phil Wilburn. Analytics for change: How networks and data science will revolutionize organizational change. Center for Creative Leadership, Juni 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.35613/ccl.2016.1044.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle