Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „The rhetorical field“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "The rhetorical field" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "The rhetorical field"
Siebert, Sabina, Graeme Martin und Gavin Simpson. „Rhetorical strategies of legitimation in the professional field of banking“. Journal of Professions and Organization 7, Nr. 2 (08.05.2020): 134–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa010.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGolyshkina, L. A. „Decoding Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Substantiation of the Scientific Direction“. Nauchnyi dialog, Nr. 5 (30.05.2020): 9–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-5-9-24.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBrinch Jørgensen, Iben. „Retorisk feltmetode. En produserende og refleksiv demokratisk praksis“. Rhetorica Scandinavica 23, Nr. 79 (10.12.2019): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.52610/qfdm8266.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMcKerrow, Raymie E. „Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Method“. Quarterly Journal of Speech 104, Nr. 2 (07.03.2018): 216–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2018.1447284.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRochmawati, Dyah. „PRAGMATIC AND RHETORICAL STRATEGIES IN THE ENGLISH-WRITTEN JOKES“. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 7, Nr. 1 (31.05.2017): 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6868.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLunde, Ingunn. „Rhetorical enargeia and linguistic pragmatics“. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5, Nr. 1 (08.03.2004): 49–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.04lun.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAdsit, Janelle, und Laura Wilder. „Borders Crossed“. Pedagogy 20, Nr. 3 (01.10.2020): 401–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/15314200-8544487.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHansson, Stina. „Rhetoric for Seventeenth-Century Salons: Beata Rosenhane's Exercise Books and Classical Rhetoric“. Rhetorica 12, Nr. 1 (1994): 43–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1994.12.1.43.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMiddleton, Michael K., Samantha Senda-Cook und Danielle Endres. „Articulating Rhetorical Field Methods: Challenges and Tensions“. Western Journal of Communication 75, Nr. 4 (Juli 2011): 386–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2011.586969.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSpoel, Philippa M. „Rereading the Elocutionists: The Rhetoric of Thomas Sheridan's A Course of Lectures on Elocution and John Walker's Elements of Elocution“. Rhetorica 19, Nr. 1 (2001): 49–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.2001.19.1.49.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "The rhetorical field"
Hogan, Kevin. „The pit, the field and the edifice : a rhetorical analysis of the commemorative 9/11 Ceremonies of September 11, 2002“. Scholarly Commons, 2006. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/642.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleChristensen, David M. „Understanding the National Science Foundation's CAREER Award Proposal Genre: A Rhetorical, Ethnographic, and System Perspective“. DigitalCommons@USU, 2011. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/923.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFärlin, Johanna. „Postmodern retorik? : Om postmodernitetens roll i det svenska retorikämnets utveckling 1980–2020“. Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Avdelningen för retorik, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-447317.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAlfaia, Lilian. „Construindo conhecimento em estudos organizacionais no Brasil“. reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10438/17277.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleApproved for entry into archive by ÁUREA CORRÊA DA FONSECA CORRÊA DA FONSECA (aurea.fonseca@fgv.br) on 2016-10-04T14:58:18Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese Lilian Alfaia - Versão final.pdf: 4983105 bytes, checksum: 708e888321d3f0d28ed59217c6fa8c05 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-18T12:18:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese Lilian Alfaia - Versão final.pdf: 4983105 bytes, checksum: 708e888321d3f0d28ed59217c6fa8c05 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-08-29
Grounded on a more constructivist and procedural perspective of science in which social and cultural practices reveal how science is made, this thesis aimed to analyse how the process of knowledge building in the field of Organizational Studies in Brazil occurred. To this end, we followed the evolution of scientific production from a longitudinal perspective, through the identification of legitimacy strategies of scientific contributions made by the authors in scientific articles that would reveal how these strategies differ rhetorically among them. We, then, unveil how these strategies differ rhetorically and map scientific contribution legitimacy strategies’ networks vs actors (individual and institutional ones) by watching how they influenced the positions of the players-actors in the scientific field over time and how they influenced the process of knowledge building in Organizational Studies. Drawing from the theory of the fields (Bourdieu, 1983a; 2004b; Greenwood, Suddaby and Hinings, 2002; Martin, 2003; Fligstein, 2003; Davis and Marquis 2005; Emirbayer and Johnson, 2008; Fligstein and McAdam, 2011; 2012) and some factors that influence the knowledge construction in Administration, we sought to understand how the actors present and defend their scientific contributions, also how the distribution of capital is organized, how the actors position themselves in the field and how they dispute the monopoly of scientific authority. Data collection consisted in the selection of 500 articles from 1960 to 2014, 430 in national journals and 70 in international ones, composing a database with various information regarding the articles. Data were categorized based on the content analysis (Bardin, 2006) and analysed through rhetorical analysis (Mann and Thompson 1988). This research thesis has shown that the actors use the argumentative capital differently, although apparently similar, depending on the context of their scientific contribution legitimacy’s strategy: internal scientific discourse, the practice’s discourse or the combination of both. Considering the use of these strategies and the ownership of capitals such as scientific and economic, from the rules of the game in the field, stakeholder groups divide themselves and compete for positions from the following setting: scientific vs ambiguous and practical vs ambiguous. Organizational Studies evolved gradually from an initial ‘pre-field’ to the current phase of the field, now with clear goals, well-defined game rules and marked positions within the existing dispute. However, beyond the repertoire defined for internal scientific discourse, the use of scientific contribution legitimacy’s strategies shows that the authors also try to legitimize their contributions through external strategies of the field, which, in turn, endorses that the Brazilian Organizational Studies field cannot yet be considered as a ‘pure’ scientific field still in search of autonomy. Key-words: scientific field, organizational studies, knowledge, rhetorical analysis, legitimacy strategies.
Esta tese teve por objetivo analisar como se deu o processo de construção de conhecimento na área de Estudos Organizacionais no Brasil, partindo de uma perspectiva mais construtivista e processual da ciência, direcionada para as práticas sociais e culturais presentes no processo científico que revelam como a ciência é feita. Para tanto, acompanhamos a evolução da produção científica a partir de uma ótica longitudinal, identificando as estratégias de legitimidade das contribuições científicas apresentadas pelos autores nos artigos científicos, desvendando como estas estratégias de legitimidade se diferenciam retoricamente e mapeando redes de estratégias de legitimidade de contribuição científica X atores (individuais e institucionais), observando como estas influenciaram as posições dos jogadores-atores no campo ao longo do tempo e como estas influenciaram o processo de construção de conhecimentos em Estudos Organizacionais.Tomando como base a teoria de campos (BOURDIEU, 1983a; 2004b; GREENWOOD, SUDDABY e HININGS, 2002; MARTIN, 2003; FLIGSTEIN, 2003; DAVIS e MARQUIS 2005; EMIRBAYER e JOHNSON, 2008; FLIGSTEIN e MCADAM, 2011; 2012) e alguns fatores que influenciam o processo de construção do conhecimento em Administração, buscamos compreender como os atores apresentam e defendem suas contribuições científicas, como se organiza a distribuição de capitais, como se posicionam no campo e como disputam o monopólio da autoridade científica. A coleta de dados consistiu na seleção de 500 artigos, 430 em periódicos nacionais e 70 em periódicos internacionais, compondo um banco de dados com diversas informações em torno dos artigos, considerando o período de 1960 até 2014. Os dados foram categorizados com base na análise de conteúdo (BARDIN, 2006) e analisados por meio de análise retórica (MANN e THOMPSON, 1988). A pesquisa mostrou que os atores (individuais e institucionais) fazem uso do capital argumentativo de modo diferenciado, embora aparentemente semelhante, conforme o contexto de sua estratégia de legitimidade de contribuição científica: discurso científico interno, discurso da prática ou a combinação de ambos. Considerando a utilização destas estratégias e da posse de capitais como científico e econômico, a partir das regras do jogo no campo, grupos de atores se dividem e disputam posições a partir da configuração: científicos X ambíguos e práticos X ambíguos.O campo de Estudos Organizacionais evoluiu aos poucos de uma fase inicial de pré-campo até a fase atual de campo, com objetivos claros, regras do jogo definidas e posições marcadas na disputa existente em seu interior. Entretanto, o uso de estratégias de legitimidade de contribuição científica para além do repertório definido para o discurso científico interno mostra que os autores também tentam legitimar suas contribuições via estratégias externas ao campo científico, revelando, assim, que o campo de Estudos Organizacionais brasileiro ainda não pode ser considerado como um campo científico 'puro', tratando-se de um campo ainda em busca de autonomia.
Queen, Mary Teresa. „Technologies of representation fields of rhetorical action in transnational feminist encounters /“. Related electronic resource: Current Research at SU : database of SU dissertations, recent titles available full text, 2005. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/syr/main.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAdams, Peter James. „A Rhetoric of mysticism“. Thesis, University of Auckland, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/2292/2021.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWhole document restricted, but available by request, use the feedback form to request access.
Holder, Cory Vaillancourt. „Teaching collaborative writing for real-world application to the field of technical writing“. CSUSB ScholarWorks, 1998. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1567.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMcKinney, Elizabeth G. „Rhetorical Technical Communication: Exploring the Gaps, Connections, and New Boundaries Between the Fields Through an Analysis of Instruction Manuals“. University of Findlay / OhioLINK, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=findlay148188814788489.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHealey, Christopher. „The use of graphic rhetoric in communicating business strategy to a diverse audience : a quasi-field experiment“. Diss., University of Pretoria, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/64851.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMini Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2017.
za2018
Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS)
MBA
Unrestricted
Lala-Sonora, Autumn Marie. „Surveying the Field: How Do (and Should) Writing Centers Market and Design“. University of Dayton / OhioLINK, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=dayton1591194133726362.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBücher zum Thema "The rhetorical field"
Professional writing and rhetoric: Readings from the field. New York: Longman Publishers, 2003.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenThe Norton Field Guide to writing. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenFrancine, Weinberg, Hrsg. The Norton field guide to writing. 2. Aufl. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2009.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenE, Wilcox Lance, Hrsg. A field guide to writing. New York, NY: HarperCollins, 1992.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenFrancine, Weinberg, Hrsg. The Norton Field guide to writing: With handbook. 3. Aufl. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2013.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenJanet, McCann, Hrsg. In a field of words: A creative writing text. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 2003.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenFlaherty, Francis. The elements of story: Field notes on nonfiction writing. New York: Collins, 2009.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenDaly, Goggin Maureen, Hrsg. The norton field guide to writing, with readings. 2. Aufl. New York: W. W. Norton, 2010.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenDaly, Goggin Maureen, Hrsg. The Norton field guide to writing, with readings. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2007.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenThe Norton field guide to writing. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2006.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "The rhetorical field"
Vlachostergiou, Aggeliki, George Marandianos und Stefanos Kollias. „From Conditional Random Field (CRF) to Rhetorical Structure Theory(RST): Incorporating Context Information in Sentiment Analysis“. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 283–95. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70407-4_38.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWolkenhauer, Anna. „International Organizations and Food: Nearing the End of the Lean Season?“ In International Organizations in Global Social Governance, 297–321. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65439-9_13.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBeger, Paula. „Party Rhetoric and Action Compared: Examining Politicisation and Compliance in the Field of Asylum and Migration Policy in the Czech Republic and Hungary“. In Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, 137–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54674-8_6.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLandau, Jamie. „Feeling Rhetorical Critics:“. In Text + Field, 72–85. Penn State University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gp46w.8.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMiddleton, Michael K., Samantha Senda-Cook und Danielle Endres. „Articulating Rhetorical Field Methods“. In Readings in Rhetorical Fieldwork, 38–55. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351190473-5.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleEwalt, Joshua P., Jessy J. Ohl und Damien Smith Pfister. „Rhetorical Field Methods in the Tradition of Imitatio“. In Text + Field, 40–55. Penn State University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gp46w.6.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLabrousse, Agnès. „The Rhetorical Superiority of Poor Economics“. In Randomized Control Trials in the Field of Development, 227–55. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865360.003.0010.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAngeli, Elizabeth L. „A Rhetorical History of a Developing Field“. In Rhetorical Work in Emergency Medical Services, 44–62. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315104881-3.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGronewoller, Brian. „Introduction“. In Rhetorical Economy in Augustine's Theology, 1–8. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197566558.003.0001.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAndrews, Charles. „Reason, Ridicule, and Indifference“. In Virginia Woolf, Europe, and Peace, 51–64. Liverpool University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781949979374.003.0004.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKonferenzberichte zum Thema "The rhetorical field"
Ramadhini, Tasya Maharani, Isti Tri Wahyuni, Nida Tsania Ramadhani, Eri Kurniawan, Wawan Gunawan und R. Dian Dia-an Muniroh. „The Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts Written by the Authors in the Field of Hard Sciences“. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.089.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCherkasova, Yelena Valeryevna. „RELEVANCE OF LINGUISTIC RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF LAW“. In Russian science: actual researches and developments. Samara State University of Economics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46554/russian.science-2020.03-1-427/430.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSPILLER, Ralf, Christof BREIDENICH und Ute HILGERS-YILMAZ. „Visual rhetoric of the Islamic State (IS): Persuasion in the field of terror“. In 10th International Conference on Design History and Design Studies. São Paulo: Editora Edgard Blücher, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5151/despro-icdhs2016-03_005.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOrr, T., und Dongxue Ma. „The language and rhetoric of bibliographic citation in the field of computing: A report of preliminary results“. In 2009 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC 2009). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2009.5208691.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBerichte der Organisationen zum Thema "The rhetorical field"
Imbrie, Andrew, Rebecca Gelles, James Dunham und Catherine Aiken. Contending Frames: Evaluating Rhetorical Dynamics in AI. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Mai 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20210010.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle