Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „State-sponsored terrorism – law and legislation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "State-sponsored terrorism – law and legislation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "State-sponsored terrorism – law and legislation"
Kochoi, Samvel M. „Transformation of Russian counter-terrorism law in the context of globalization“. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo, Nr. 43 (2022): 69–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/22253513/43/6.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleЕфремов, Андрей, und Andrey Efremov. „THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USA LEGISLATION ON THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AFTER 11 SEPTEMBER 2001“. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 3, Nr. 3 (10.07.2017): 86–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/article_593fc343c391e2.71878517.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKokoeva, Louisa, Angelina Kolieva und Yaroslav Garmyshev. „Improvement of Terrorism-Related Criminal Liability“. Всероссийский криминологический журнал 13, Nr. 1 (26.02.2019): 125–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(1).125-131.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePrakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana. „Involvement of the Indonesian National Military (TNI) in Legislation about Anti-Terrorism:“. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights 5, Nr. 1 (14.06.2021): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v5i1.18469.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAdarkwah, Samuel Boadi. „Counter-Terrorism Framework and Individual Liberties in Ghana“. African Journal of International and Comparative Law 28, Nr. 1 (Februar 2020): 50–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2020.0301.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMits, Denis. „The Anti-Terrorist Function of the State and the Problem of “Preventive” Coordination“. Legal Concept, Nr. 3 (Oktober 2019): 50–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2019.3.7.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleN.V., Morozov, Gubina A.M. und Kotelyanets O.S. „The Legal Status of Auditors and Audit Organizations in the AML / CFT system“. KnE Social Sciences 3, Nr. 2 (15.02.2018): 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i2.1584.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleL.P., Samofalov, und Samofalov O.L. „. Problems of legal regulation of combatinig terrorism and prevention of terrorist acts“. Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law 2020, Nr. 2 (18.12.2020): 84–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2020.02.084.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKochoi, Samvel, und Ameen Hasan. „Countering Terrorism in Iraq: Law and Practice“. Всероссийский криминологический журнал 13, Nr. 1 (26.02.2019): 94–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(1).94-102.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePokrzywiński, Paweł. „Izraelskie ustawodawstwo antyterrorystyczne wobec zagrożeń XXI wieku“. Przegląd Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego 13, Nr. 24 (2021): 91–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/20801335pbw.21.004.13561.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "State-sponsored terrorism – law and legislation"
Siles, Vallejos Abraham. „The anti-terrorist fighting in Peru: legal black holes, gray holes and the arduous constitutional way. Peruvian lessons for the war on global terrorism“. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2015. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/115663.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleEl presente trabajo examina, desde el paradigma del Estado constitucional de derecho, la estrategia antiterrorista que desarrolló el Perú. Una de las expresiones de esta lucha antisubversiva fue la instauración casi permanente de los regímenes de excepción y la aprobación de las leyes penales de emergencia, las cuales son analizadas críticamente, pues propiciaron graves afectaciones a los derechos fundamentales. En ese sentido, se muestra, con grave preocupación, la creación por parte del Estado peruano de«agujeros negros» y «agujeros grises» legales en desmedro de las víctimas de desaparición forzada. Finaliza el autor haciendo un balance de la postura de los órganos jurisdiccionales y el reto que tienen en la construcción del modelo democrático y constitucional de lucha contra el terrorismo.
Teixeira, Júnior Geraldo Alves 1984. „Razão de Estado e política antiterrorismo nos Estados Unidos“. [s.n.], 2011. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/280911.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-19T03:37:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TeixeiraJunior_GeraldoAlves_D.pdf: 12974491 bytes, checksum: ef0f7aec2f638114c9a64bcca5d6be1e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011
Resumo: O pensamento sobre a razão de Estado pode ser dito fundamental para a política moderna, já que seu desenvolvimento inicial coincide com o do próprio surgimento do Estado. Onde crescia a razão de Estado, crescia o Estado, que por sua vez fomentava aquela política. Acusada de ocorrer à revelia da moral, essa circularidade e o acúmulo de poder que ela envolve foi certamente responsável por consolidar o Estado como instituição quaseuniversal. A consolidação das instituições estatais não extinguiu, contudo, a razão de Estado, que como técnica de poder ou como pretensa racionalidade superior acompanhou os distintos momentos da política. A presente pesquisa examina inicialmente o contexto histórico e intelectual que originou o pensamento sobre a razão de Estado a fim de permitir uma visão panorâmica do tema na teoria política. Após o estudo histórico discorre-se sobre os diversos elementos que compõem este tema e analisa-se os modos pelos quais eles operam na prática política. Nesta primeira parte são utilizados diversos textos de reconhecidos estudiosos do pensamento político, como Friedrich Meinecke, Carl J. Friedrich, Quentin Skinner e Michel Senellart, mas recorre-se também diretamente aos textos históricos de Nicolau Maquiavel, Giovanni Botero, Thomas Hobbes e Gabriel Naudé. No estágio seguinte aplica-se o estudo inicial a um caso concreto. São estudadas algumas ações políticas e jurídicas do governo dos Estados Unidos, assim como leis criadas para combater o terrorismo, notavelmente aquelas que entraram em vigor após os ataques que o país sofreu em 11 de setembro de 2001. Antes de abordar o ponto central recupera-se fatores históricos que influenciaram os rumos do Estado americano e alguns eventos que constituem precedentes importantes da política antiterror. Após a devida contextualização, o trabalho centra-se na análise de uma lei de 2001, o Patriot Act, e nas ações estatais que ela possibilitou nos anos seguintes. Na segunda parte do trabalho utiliza-se, além de textos acadêmicos, artigos jornalísticos, documentos oficiais do governo americano, textos de leis, jurisprudência e relatórios e declarações de setores da sociedade civil e de comentadores de temas jurídicos. O exame da doutrina da razão de Estado, aplicado ao caso específico dos Estados Unidos no referido contexto corrobora a tese, pormenorizada no capítulo conclusivo, de que as recentes formas de combate ao terrorismo recuperam e fortalecem o pensamento sobre a razão de Estado, agora na situação particular dos Estados liberais-democráticos
Abstract: Reason of State theories might be considered fundamental to modern politics for its beginning occurs together with the emergence of States themselves. Where reason of State was rising, it helped the State growth that, in turn, stimulated reason of State policies. Criticized for having put aside moral concerns, such circularity and the accumulation of power it produces may be pointed as an important cause leading to the consolidation of the State as a quasi-universal institution. Nonetheless, the States did not extinguished reason of State after being consolidated. As techniques or as a specific rationality it was adapted for each new context of politics. This work starts by investigating the historical and intellectual context that gave birth to reason of State in order to show a panoramic view of the theme in the political theory. After the historical study I analyse several elements which constitutes reason of State and I present how they operate in political practice. For this first part several texts of recognized academics of political thought are used, such as Friedrich Meinecke, Carl J. Friedrich, Quentin Skinner and Michel Senellart, but I also resort to the historical texts of Niccolo Machiavelli, Giovanni Botero, Thomas Hobbes and Gabriel Naudé. At the next stage the previous study is applied to a concrete case. I analyse political and judicial actions of the American government and some legislation created to combat terrorism, particularly those that went in force after the attacks the country suffered on September 11, 2001 (9/11). Before dealing with the main point I present historical events which have influenced the course of the United States politics and some important precedents of the anti-terror policies. After proper contextualization the study is focused on the 2001 law called Patriot Act and on the state actions it has authorized in the years that followed its creation. In the second part, besides academic texts and news articles, I make use of official documents, statute texts, judicial cases, reports and declarations of civil society organizations and of legal themes' commentators. The study of reason of State doctrine applied to the specific case of the United States at the mentioned context corroborates the thesis addressed at the conclusive chapter stating that the recent anti-terror policies revive and strengthen reason of State thought, now acting at the particular situation of liberal democracies
Doutorado
Filosofia
Doutor em Filosofia
Drouvot, Laurent. „Etude historique du droit antiterroriste français depuis 1986“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023TOUL0160.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSince the law of September 9, 1986 on terrorism, the French public authority has adopted a very unique law to fight against a phenomenon that will be described as recurrent in French history. It was, through such a law at the time of its vote in any case to defeat the terrorist phenomenon and this at a time of political tension that it weighed on the State at the origin of this legislative creation. Tt should be noted that the law indicated was situated in a purely judicial perspective offering both a completely rigorous device in repression and also a form of benevolence if we judge by the existence of it device aimed at repentants. Both the police and the jurisdictional phase have been equipped with this law with a now robust legal apparatus capable of stemming the terrorist threat. The interest in studying the aspect of the fight against terrorism since the creation of this matrix law on which the study is based makes it possible to list after it the assertion of large number of anti-terrorist laws which have undoubtedly remodeled the vision on matter. Thus, to a system at tq.e base of its purely judicial creation and above all eminently retrospective, the evolution of the terrorist phenomenon and especially the culture of the martyr particularly in the evolution of terrorism of Middle Eastern origin, to direct the legislator under the weight dramatic events to focus more and more on the preventive aspect of the threat. This is how surreptitiously the pre-judicial phase grew to anticipate the phenomenon and where intelligence therefore flourished.Indeed, many laws have evolved towards the pre-offence aspect in order to be able to stem events even before they occur. Such a development is not neutral in guaranteeing respect for the public freedoms due to citizens, even though legislative activism on the subject does not seem to suffer from any criticism of Caesarism since it is a question of guaranteeing the protection of the people against indiscriminate violence. Such an evolution will know its consecration with the reactivation of the law of April 3, 1955 relating to the state of emergency which, at the time of Sunni terrorism which recently rocked the French nation, will lead to multiple extensions of such a derogatory regime for the management of civil liberties with all its corollaries of restrictions. The law of October 30, 2017 will then crown this return of administrative law to the fight since it will enshrine technical elements of the state of emergency in common law. The occurrence shortly after of the health crisis will greatly disrupt French democratic life in a state of permanent stress on a subject this time health of restrictions of publie freedoms once again, we will see decision-making on this subject in outside Parliament with the Defense Council. Thus, the fight against terrorism today has two paths, on the one hand the judicial aspect when the act took place as at the time of the matrix law but on the other hand above all the administrative path when it is a question of seeking the risk of a terrorist act. Both of these laws are subject to conventional and Europea law control, a situation guaranteeing a form of protection for citizens. This protection provided by what is referred to as the rule of law is currently being criticized at a time when governments are in precarious phases and have taken a liking tc sui generis legislation
Malone, Chad Allen. „A Socio-Historical Analysis of U.S. State Terrorism from 1948 to 2008“. University of Toledo / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1216592463.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDELERUE, François. „State-sponsored cyber operations and international law“. Doctoral thesis, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/43904.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleExamining Board: Professor Nehal Bhuta, European University Institute (EUI Supervisor); Professor Jean d’Aspremont, University of Manchester; Professor Marco Roscini, University of Westminster; Professor Joseph H. H. Weiler, European University Institute & New York University
This doctoral dissertation investigates the wide range of conceptualizations and categorizations that are applicable to state-sponsored cyber operations. State-sponsored cyber operations, namely recourse to cyber means by one State against another, are generally labelled 'cyber warfare'. This is neither a legal nor a prescriptive term; it reflects, however, a disproportionate focus on the realm of warfare. Avoiding hasty or overly simplistic characterizations of situations as cyber warfare is important to avoid further deterioration of their relations leading potentially to military escalation. This dissertation defines state-sponsored cyber operations according to international law and demonstrates that the majority of these incidents fall outside of the realm of (cyber) warfare and, therefore, need to be addressed separately and approached differently. Most state-sponsored cyber operations do not actually violate the prohibition of the use of force or the law of armed conflict, but rather they impinge the territorial sovereignty of the targeted States, the principle of nonintervention, or human rights. Cyber warfare is only the tip of the iceberg. An entire world lies submerged: cyber operations below the threshold of cyber warfare. While the emerged part concerning cyber warfare is well-studied and widely known, this thesis endeavours to shed light on the submerged, and arguably bigger, part that has been understudied and is less known. Parts I and II map the circumstances in which state-sponsored cyber operations violate international law. They demonstrate inter alia that most cyber operations remain under the threshold of cyber warfare, while they may constitute a breach of territorial sovereignty, the principle of non-intervention or even human rights law in most cases. Part I also analyzes the duty of diligence of third States. Part III deals with the attribution of cyber operations, analysing the attribution to the machine, to the human perpetrator, and focusing more specifically on the attribution to the sponsoring State. Part IV focuses on the consequences of an internationally wrongful cyber operation, mainly the obligations deriving from the law of State responsibility, and the remedies to address it, notably the recourse to self-defence, retorsion and countermeasures.
Kgosietsile, Madume. „Protection against torture in international law“. Diss., 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19200.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePublic, Constitutional, and International Law
LLM
Balint, Jennifer. „In the name of the state : genocide, state crime and the law“. Phd thesis, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/148646.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAlexander, Deanna W. „How could this happen? a constructivist analysis of reactive state terrorism at Ruby Ridge /“. 2001. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04202001-163258.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBücher zum Thema "State-sponsored terrorism – law and legislation"
Bruno, Simma, Hrsg. Transnational terrorism and state accountability: A new theory of prevention. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing, 2012.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBustos, Juan Fernando Cristo. La guerra por las víctimas: Lo que nunca se supo de la ley. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones B, 2012.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. H.R. 3107: Markup before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, second session, on H.R. 3107, March 21, 1996. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1996.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Financial Services. Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises. The need to extend the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act: Field hearing before the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises of the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, March 5, 2007. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2007.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. Subcommittee on the Middle East and Central Asia. Enforcement of the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act and increasing security threats from Iran: Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Middle East and Central Asia of the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, first session, June 25, 2003. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2003.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenLubell, Noam. Extraterritorial use of force against non-state actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenDabone, Zakaria. Le droit international public relatif aux groupes armés non étatiques. Genève: Université de Genève, Faculté de Droit, 2012.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenMurphy, Karen. State security regimes and the right to freedom of religion and belief: Changes in Europe since 2001. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSerbia. Restitucija, rehabilitacija i svojina. Beograd: Intermex, 2012.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenAleh, Dzi͡a︡rnovich, Hrsg. Rėabilitatsyi͡a︡: Zbornik dakumentaŭ i narmatyŭnykh aktaŭ pa rėabilitatsyi akhvi͡a︡raŭ palitychnykh rėprėsii͡a︡ŭ, 1920-1980-kh hadoŭ u Belarusi. Minsk: Athenæum, 2001.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "State-sponsored terrorism – law and legislation"
Rossi, Norma. „Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close: Criminal Terrorism and Exceptional Legislation in Italy“. In Law, Security and the State of Perpetual Emergency, 107–32. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44959-9_5.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKhamzaev, Dilaver. „Regionalisation of International Initiatives: Case Study of the Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism (EAG)“. In International Political Economy Series, 113–40. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55341-7_5.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHazel, Fox, und Webb Philippa. „Part II The Sources of the Law of State Immunity, 8 US Law: The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 1976“. In The Law of State Immunity. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198744412.003.0009.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Federal Law On Counteracting The Legalisation (Or Laundering) Of Revenues Received By Criminal Means And Financing Of Terrorism (7 August 2001, as amended)“. In Russian Company And Commercial Legislation, herausgegeben von W. E. Butler, 717–30. Oxford University PressOxford, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199261529.003.0020.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBlackbourn, Jessie, Fiona de Londras und Lydia Morgan. „The Practice and Potential of Counter-Terrorism Review“. In Accountability and Review in the Counter-Terrorist State, 51–92. Policy Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206234.003.0003.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleYıldırım, Zeki. „Suç ve Ceza Siyaseti Bakımından Af ve Terör Suçları“. In Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta ve Türk Hukukunda Terörizm, Terör Suçları ve İnfaz Hukuku Cilt 3, 361–422. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.53478/tuba.978-625-8352-91-7.ch13.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelled’Orsi, Cristiano. „Combating Terrorism and Managing Asylum Seekers and Refugees under AU Law“. In The Emergent African Union Law, 231–47. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862154.003.0013.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBarton, Mary S. „State-Sponsored Terror, 1934–37“. In Counterterrorism Between the Wars, 152–78. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864042.003.0007.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKitsos, Panagiotis, und Aikaterini Yannoukakou. „Privacy in the 21st Century“. In Standards and Standardization, 1638–52. IGI Global, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8111-8.ch075.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMrvić Petrović, Nataša. „Materijalno krivično pravo Evropske unije i proces usklađivanja na primeru prava Republike Srbije“. In 65 godina od Rimskih ugovora: Evropska unija i perspektive evropskih integracija Srbije, 73–89. Institute of Comparative Law, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56461/zr_22.65godru.k1_mp.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBerichte der Organisationen zum Thema "State-sponsored terrorism – law and legislation"
Lewis, Dustin, Radhika Kapoor und Naz Modirzadeh. Advancing Humanitarian Commitments in Connection with Countering Terrorism: Exploring a Foundational Reframing concerning the Security Council. Harvard Law School Program on International Law and Armed Conflict, Dezember 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.54813/uzav2714.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle