Thematische Bibliographien / South African War, 1889-1902

Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „South African War, 1889-1902“

Autor: Grafiati
Veröffentlicht am 26. Juli 2024

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "South African War, 1889-1902" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "South African War, 1889-1902"

1

Cohen, Brett, und Bill Nasson. „The South African War, 1899-1902“. History Teacher 35, Nr. 4 (August 2002): 541. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1512485.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Lamphear, John, und Bill Nasson. „The South African War 1899-1902“. International Journal of African Historical Studies 33, Nr. 2 (2000): 495. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/220744.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Higham, Robin. „The South African War, 1899–1902“. History: Reviews of New Books 28, Nr. 2 (Januar 2000): 79–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03612759.2000.10525415.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Baylen, J. O., und Bill Nasson. „The South African War 1899-1902“. Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies 32, Nr. 4 (2000): 713. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4053691.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Grundy, Kenneth W., und Bill Nasson. „The South African War 1899-1902“. American Historical Review 105, Nr. 5 (Dezember 2000): 1848. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2652211.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Miller, Stephen M., und Bill Nasson. „The South African War, 1899-1902“. Journal of Military History 64, Nr. 2 (April 2000): 551. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/120277.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

NASSON, BILL. „MORE SOUTH AFRICAN SHENANIGANS The Origins of the South African War, 1899–1902. By IAIN R. SMITH. London and New York: Longman, 1995. Pp. xix + 455. £15.99 (ISBN 0-582-27777-9).“ Journal of African History 38, Nr. 1 (März 1997): 123–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021853796316903.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
In some ways, The Origins of the South African War 1899–1902 is an awfully fat book for what has perhaps become an awfully thin and fatiguing subject. Do we really need yet another stab at J. A. Hobson on the Jameson Raid and the notion of the capitalist conspiracy war? Is there much to be gained from further deliberation over the 1896 Selborne Memorandum dealing with the crisis in South Africa? Despite Dr Smith's suggestion (p. x) that recent historiography of the South African War has been preoccupied more with the experience of that conflict than with its origins, the fact remains that modern English-language scholarship on the causes of the war, starting well over three decades ago with Robinson and Gallagher's Africa and the Victorians, continues to outweigh heavily writing on the actual conduct of hostilities between Britain and the Boer republics. We continue to know much more about the pre-war shenanigans between Milner and the Uitlanders than about the relationship between technology and strategy during 1899–1902 or the demographic consequences of an exhausting war. So, the question must be: does Iain Smith breathe new life into the enormously complex, broadly familiar, sometimes tedious, historical arguments over the origins of the South African War?
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Samson, Anne. „Duty to Empire? South Africa's Invasion of German South West Africa, 1914-1918“. African Research & Documentation 128 (2015): 10–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305862x00023475.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Before war broke out in August 1914, the Union of South Africa had determined to include the German colony of South West Africa in the Union fold if ever an opportunity arose. So, when Britain went to war on 4 August 1914, the British War Cabinet request that South Africa put the German wireless stations in the South West African territory out of action was likely to be met with favourable response. It was, but not by all as this paper will set out.In 1914, South Africa as a country was only four years old and was still trying to heal the wounds caused by the Anglo-Boer or South African War of 1899-1902. The Union Defence Force (UDF) was even younger, having been approved in 1912. Where the Union had already had a number of years to develop, the UDF was in effect starting from zero.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Samson, Anne. „Duty to Empire? South Africa's Invasion of German South West Africa, 1914-1918“. African Research & Documentation 128 (2015): 10–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305862x00023475.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Before war broke out in August 1914, the Union of South Africa had determined to include the German colony of South West Africa in the Union fold if ever an opportunity arose. So, when Britain went to war on 4 August 1914, the British War Cabinet request that South Africa put the German wireless stations in the South West African territory out of action was likely to be met with favourable response. It was, but not by all as this paper will set out.In 1914, South Africa as a country was only four years old and was still trying to heal the wounds caused by the Anglo-Boer or South African War of 1899-1902. The Union Defence Force (UDF) was even younger, having been approved in 1912. Where the Union had already had a number of years to develop, the UDF was in effect starting from zero.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Morton, R. F. „Linchwe I and the Kgatla Campaign in the South African War, 1899-1902“. Journal of African History 26, Nr. 2-3 (März 1985): 169–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021853700036926.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Although the importance of the African role in the South African War (1889-1902) is now recognized, this study of the Bakgatala ba ga Kgafela is the first to demonstrate an African perception of events and argue that the Kgatla initiated military action and pursued goals independent of a simple British vs. Boer formula. The war created major economic and political opportunities for the Kgatla, a people physically separated and colonially partitioned. Half the Kgatla lived in the Kgatla Reserve of the British-ruled Bechuanaland Protectorate, and the other half lived in the Saulspoort area of the western Transvaal under Boer rule. Their leader, Linchwe I (1874–1924), maintained his capital at Mochudi in the Protectorate and received only partial allegiance from the Saulspoort Kgatia. Soon after the war began, Linchwe involved his regiments actively in fighting alongside the British in the Protectorate and raiding on their own in the Transvaal in an effort to eliminate Boer settlement and political control in Saulspoort and other areas of the western Transvaal. Kgatia regiments also emptied Boer farms of cattle which, in addition to restoring the national herd decimated by the 1897 rinderpest, Linchwe used in establishing his political hold over the Saulspoort Kgatia. Protectorate officials were grateful for Kgatia support, but Linchwe disguised the extent and nature of Kgatia operations and concealed from the British his political objectives. Linchwe's campaign made possible in the years following the war the reunification of the Kgatia under his authority, the distribution of wealth among all his people and the reduction of colonial interference in the political lives of his people.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Mehr Quellen

Dissertationen zum Thema "South African War, 1889-1902"

1

Shearing, Taffy. „The Cape rebel of the South African War, 1899-1902 /“. Link to the online version, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1246.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Ross, Helen M. „A woman's world at a time of war : an analysis of selected women's diaries during the Anglo-Boer War 1899-1902“. Thesis, Link to the online version, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10019/1182.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Shearing, Hilary Anne. „The Cape Rebel of the South African War, 1899-1902“. Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1246.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Thesis (DPhil (History))—University of Stellenbosch, 2005.
This dissertation investigates the role of a group of Cape colonists who rose in rebellion against the colonial government and allied themselves to the Boer Republics during the South African War of 1899-1902. The decision of the Griqualand West colonists to join the Republican forces took place against a background of severe deprivation in the agricultural sector due to the losses sustained in the rinderpest pandemic of 1896/1897. It also coincided with the invasion of Griqualand West by Transvaal forces. The failure of the Schreiner Government to defend its borders encouraged rebellion, as there were no armed forces to oppose either the invasion or the rebellion. While some of the Cape rebels fought on the side of the Republicans during major battles along the Modder River, others were commandeered to gather and transport supplies to the laagers. Four months after the surrender of Gen P Cronje at Paardeberg the majority of these rebels had laid down arms except for those under Gen Piet de Villiers who fought on in the Transvaal. After a second rebellion in 1901, far fewer rebels fought a war of attrition north of the Orange River; eventually about 700 men leaving the Cape Colony to avoid laying down arms. South of the Orange River Free State forces commandeered the disaffected colonists of the Stormberg and Colesberg regions in November 1899. Because the Republicans had not occupied these regions earlier in the war, British reinforcements and the Colonial Division took to the field against them almost immediately. The victory gained at Stormberg in December 1899 by the Boer forces was not followed up. Olivier failed to integrate his forces; unlike those at Colesberg where the Boers were far better led and scored some notable successes. The Republican burghers withdrew from the Cape Colony in March 1901, which in turn led to a mass surrender ofrebels. Those that were captured under arms were sent as POWs to Ceylon and India, while those that surrendered were held in colonial gaols until they were bailed or given passes. Only a few hundred continued to wage war in the Boer Republics for the remainder of 1900. The second invasion by Free State forces into the Cape Colony consisted of mobile commandos that criss-crossed the interior. For the first few months they sowed havoc, but after June 1901 the military used mass tactics against those who were forced into the isolated northwest Cape. In 1902, unknown to them, the Boer republics signed the Treaty of Vereeniging and ceased to exist as sovereign states. The Cape rebels were not signatories to the treaty. According to an agreement between the Boer leaders and the Colonial Office, if a rebel surrendered and pleaded guilty to High Treason under Proclamation 100 of 1902 he would receive a partial amnesty and be disfranchised. However rebel officers were charged in court and fines and prison sentences would be handed down. After the first invasion rebels who were captured or surrendered were tried under the Indemnity and Special Tribunals Act that was in force for six months until April 1901. Martial Law was then again in vogue from 22 April until Peace at the end of May 1902, and under this act 44 Cape colonists, Republicans and aliens were executed, and hundreds .of others, whose death sentences were commuted to penal servitude for life, were shipped to POW camps on Bermuda and St Helena. The surrenders 00,442 rebels were accepted under Proclamation 100 of 1902. Rebel officers or those facing serious charges were tried under the Indemnity and Special Tribunals Act in Special High Treason Courts. The general amnesty announced in 1905 brought to an end the prosecutions for High Treason ofCape rebels. In 1906 the names of disfranchised colonists were. replaced on the Voters' Roll. The final official return of Cape rebels for 1903 is 12,205 or 0.5% of the total population, while the return according to the database is 16,198 rebels or 0.7%. Strategically the rebellions played a limited role in the overall Republican war effort despite the individual rebel's self-sacrifice to the cause. However, although small in numbers, the rebellion had an enormous impact on colonial life (especially in 1901) as it led to a thinly disguised civil war and enmity between the Afrikaner and English colonists, which took years to disappear.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Surridge, Keith Terrance. „British civil-military relations and the South African War (1899-1902)“. Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 1994. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/british-civilmilitary-relations-and-the-south-african-war-18991902(24971b52-a519-4100-83b2-a730462bc426).html.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Kessler, Stowell van Courtland. „The black concentration camps of the South African War, 1899-1902“. Doctoral thesis, University of Cape Town, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/6039.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Benoit, Edward 1971. „D Battery, Royal Canadian Field Artillery, in the South African War,1900“. Thesis, McGill University, 1997. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=27930.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Canadian military historians have overlooked the role of the Canadian artillery in the South African War of 1899-1902, This thesis is an attempt to fill that gap in the historiography, Based largely on primary sources such as newspaper reports, military records, and personal diaries and letters, the thesis examines the contributions and experiences of D battery, Royal Canadian Field Artillery, in South African War. It asserts that the battery played a variety of roles, ranging from the monotonous line of communication duty to intense combat actions, and that the soldiers reacted to this varied experience in different ways.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Hill, David. „Masculinity and war : diaries and letters of soldiers serving in the South African War (1899-1902)“. Thesis, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10443/1280.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This thesis is located in the general academic rubric of ‘masculinity’ and war but specifically that sort of masculinity that will be identified by its association with the 'Boer War' known more appropriately as the South African War 1899-1902. Since the 1980's, masculinity has been the subject of growing academic and intellectual scrutiny. Within this context the relationship between masculinity and war has not been widely interrogated or documented, and certainly examination of the South African War (1899-1902) and masculinity conflation is negligible. Central to the thesis is the critical examination of the narratives of soldiers who fought in South Africa at this time. The thesis offers a detailed examination of military masculinities as played out in the South African War through critically exploring the soldier's narratives written during the conflict. It locates the analysis within the socio-cultural influences that impacted on the ‘manly’ soldier at the end of the 19th century allowing a 'micro mapping' of masculinity to be revealed in these soldiers' writings. The letters and diaries of soldiers serving in the South African conflict are analysed through the lens of masculinity; employing a qualitative methodology drawing on thematic narrative analysis utilising a ‘tool kit’ comprising three theoretical constructs of social construction, performativity and emotions. The letters and diaries accessed were written by regular and volunteer soldiers both British and colonial, including officers and the ordinary ‘Tommy’. They reveal a range of masculinity themes that become the empirical focus of the research including: manly imagery, patriotism, bravery, camaraderie and social relations between all ranks, lust for fighting, stoicism and honour/dishonour. The critical interrogation of the soldiers' diaries and letters in this thesis concludes that military masculinities in war are complex, multiple and fluid.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Pretorius, Willem Jacobus. „Die Britse owerheid en die burgerlike bevolking van Heidelberg, Transvaal, gedurende die Anglo-Boereoorlog“. Pretoria : [S.n.], 2007. http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-07012008-152711/.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Yakutiel, Marc M. „"Treasury control" and the South African War, 1899-c.1905“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 1989. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:72996f72-53d5-4c91-aafb-943ed406f9c3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This thesis gives an account of the Treasury's role in preparing for, and conducting, the South African War, at a time when the orthodox Gladstonian principles of public finance were being challenged. It is a case study, in an exceptional instance, of the nature and effectiveness of Treasury control over expenditure on imperial expansion; of the Treasury's view of how a colonial war should be financed and who was to pay for it, of what cost-benefit analysis the Treasury applied to a colonial war, and of why it relied on recouping a substantial part of the war cost from an indemnity levied on a defeated Transvaal. The thesis is an attempt to define the vague concept of "Treasury control", not in constitutional theory, but as it worked in practice. It is argued that Treasury control and the rigidity of the annual peace time budget obstructed before the war the taking of any serious military precautions, left no reserve fund for war contingencies, and made any long-term strategic planning almost impossible. Rather than run the risk of asking money from Parliament for reinforcements to South Africa, which would be unpopular, as it might require increased taxation, and which might prove unnecessary, the Cabinet waited till the need to spend taxpayers' money had been demonstrated, although it could result in initial setbacks and in a longer and more expensive campaign. This, in conjunction with Milner's and Chamberlain's political strategy, dictated a military solution to the crisis. It is further argued that at first the Treasury estimated the cost of the war at £10 million, while assuring Parliament that a substantial part of it would be recouped by way of indemnity from the Transvaal. But the colonial expedition turned into a war on a European scale, the final charge to the British Exchequer was £217 million, and not a penny of indemnity was exacted from the Transvaal. The Treasury's view was restricted largely to the current year's budget and the following year's estimates, and how to secure their approval in Parliament. In this case, Treasury control was as ineffective during the war, as its estimates of the cost of the war and who would pay for it, were unrealistic.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Changuion, Louis Annis. „Die lewe in die Suid-Afrikaanse boerekrygsgevangekampe tydens die Anglo-Boereoorlog, 1899-1902“. Pretoria : [s.n.], 2000. http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-03012007-162815.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Mehr Quellen

Bücher zum Thema "South African War, 1889-1902"

1

Donal, Lowry, Hrsg. The South African War reappraised. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Donal, Lowry, Hrsg. The South African War reappraised. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2000.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Pakenham, Thomas. The Boer War. New York: Random House, 1994.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Hartesveldt, Fred R. Van. The Boer War. Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing, 2000.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Nasson, Bill. The war for South Africa. Cape Town: Tafelberg, 2010.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Judd, Denis. The Boer War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Judd, Denis. The Boer War. London: John Murray, 2002.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Cammack, Diana Rose. The Rand at war, 1899-1902: The Witwatersrand and the Anglo-Boer War. London: J. Currey, 1990.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

1960-, Omissi David E., und Thompson Andrew S. 1968-, Hrsg. The impact of the South African War. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Smurthwaite, David. The Boer War, 1899-1902. London: Hamlyn, 2002.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Mehr Quellen

Buchteile zum Thema "South African War, 1889-1902"

1

Donaldson, Peter. „The South African War, 1899–1902“. In Sport, War and the British, 39–64. New York : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in sports history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429323799-3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Pretorius, Frans-Johan. „Justifying the South African War: Boer Propaganda, 1899–1902“. In Justifying War, 23–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230393295_2.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Selby, John. „The Second Anglo-Boer War, 1899-1902“. In A Short History of South Africa, 187–201. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003312703-12.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

McCulloch, Jock, und Pavla Miller. „Mapping and Resolving a Health Crisis: 1902–1929“. In Mining Gold and Manufacturing Ignorance, 55–80. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8327-6_3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
AbstractThe history of gold mining in South Africa was marked by several profound crises. This chapter traces the emergence and resolution of the first one. Following official recognition of the disproportionate mortality of miners from North of latitude 22 South, in 1913 the South African government banned further recruitment of ‘Tropical’ labour. Several commissions of enquiry, a series of pioneering Mines and Miners’ Phthisis Acts, the creation of a state supported research community, the commissioning of vaccine for pneumonia and the establishment of a system of compulsory medical examinations helped resolve the crisis politically. Living and working conditions on the mines improved, and deaths from pneumonia were reduced. However, the risk of silicosis and TB infection remained, and repatriations of sick and dying men continued. The first health crisis became a model for how the mining houses would respond to occupational disease. The industry captured the science, framed the legislation and externalised the principal costs of occupational disease onto labour-sending communities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

McCulloch, Jock, und Pavla Miller. „Dissenting voices: 1902–1956“. In Mining Gold and Manufacturing Ignorance, 297–320. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8327-6_11.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
AbstractThere were a number of medical experts who contested the Chamber’s claims about mine safety. The dissent began after 1910 and stretched well into the apartheid era. The dissenters included Drs John Mitchell, Eustace Cluver and Peter Allan, all at one time senior members of the South African Department of Public Health. There was also Dr A.H. Watt, the medical officer with Rand Insurance; Dr Basil Dormer, the Union’s Chief Tuberculosis Officer; Anthony Mavrogordato of the SAIMR; and Dr Gerrit Schepers, who served as a specialist with the Silicosis Bureau from 1944 until 1954. The dissenters pointed out that dust exposures in the mines and conditions in the compounds were unsafe; that infectious disease, most notably tuberculosis, was being spread from the mines to labour-sending areas; that the conduct of mine medicals was inadequate and was failing to pick up compensable disease; and that mine wages were so low that many families were malnourished. The lone dissenter to voice all of those concerns was Dr Neil Macvicar, who for almost forty years served as a medical missionary in the Eastern Cape. Macvicar, who worked initially in tuberculosis prevention programmes in Scotland, had first-hand knowledge of mine recruiting in Nyasaland. Macvicar’s views about prevention were conventional. He believed that tuberculosis could only be combatted by social change: governments must guarantee food security and promote the education of patients and their families on how to manage the disease.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Miller, Stephen M. „The South African War, 1899–1902“. In Queen Victoria's Wars, 281–307. Cambridge University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108785020.014.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Beaumont, Jacqueline. „The Times at war, 1899–1902“. In The South African War reappraised. Manchester University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7765/9781526121523.00009.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Kissin, S. F. „The South African (Boer) War 1899–1902“. In War and the Marxists, 119–25. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429267178-14.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Nasson, Bill. „The South African War/Anglo-Boer War 1899–1902 and political memory in South Africa“. In Commemorating War, 111–27. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315080956-3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Smallman-Raynor, Matthew, und Andrew Cliff. „Further Regional Studies“. In War Epidemics. Oxford University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198233640.003.0023.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
In Chapters 7 to 11, we have examined a series of recurring themes in the geography of war and disease since 1850 through regional lenses. In this chapter, we conclude our regional–thematic survey by illustrating further prominent themes which, either because of their subject-matter or because of their geographical location, were beyond the immediate scope of the foregoing chapters. In selecting regional case studies for this chapter, we concentrate on wars which have not been examined in depth to this point (the South African War and the Cuban Insurrection) or which, on account of their magnitude and extent, merit examination beyond that afforded in previous sections (World War I and World War II). Four principal issues are addressed: (1) Africa: population reconcentration and disease (Section 12.2), illustrated with reference to civilian concentration camps in the South African War, 1899–1902; (2) Americas: peace, war, and epidemiological integration (Section 12.3), illustrated with reference to the civil settlement system of Cuba, 1888–1902; (3) Asia: prisoners of war, forced labour, and disease (Section 12.4), illustrated with reference to Allied prisoners on the line of the Burma–Thailand Railway, 1942–4; (4) Europe: civilian epidemics and the world wars (Section 12.5), illustrated with reference to the spread of a series of diseases in the civil population of Europe during, and after, the hostilities of 1914–18 and 1939–45. As before, the study sites in (1) to (4) span a broad range of epidemiological environments, from the cool temperate latitudes of northern Europe, through the tropical island and jungle environments of the Caribbean and Southeast Asia, to the warm temperate and subtropical savannah lands of the South African Veld. Diseases have been sampled to reflect this epidemiological range. The South African War (1899–1902) has been described as the last of the ‘typhoid campaigns’ (Curtin, 1998)—a closing chapter on the predominance of disease over battle as a cause of death among soldiers (Pakenham, 1979: 382). From the military perspective, typhoid was indeed the major health issue of the war, accounting for a reported 8,020 deaths in the British Army (Simpson, 1911: 57).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Die Auswahlen zum Thema "South African War, 1889-1902" für konkrete Quellenarten können Sie auch interessieren:
Zeitschriftenartikel Dissertationen Bücher
Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!

Zur Bibliographie