Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Semiotics“
Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Semiotics.
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Semiotics" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
1
Boyko, Taras. „Reading Uspenskij: Soviet ‘semiotics of history’ in the West“. Sign Systems Studies 45, Nr. 3/4 (31.12.2017): 380–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2017.45.3-4.10.
Annotation:
The article explores the reception of Boris Uspenskij’s writings and ideas outside of the Soviet Union, primarily in Western European and North American academic contexts. The present brief overview of Uspenskij’s academic reception covers the translations of his best-known scholarly works [first and foremost “Historia sub specie semioticae” and “Istoriya i semiotika (Vospriyatie vremeni kak semioticheskaya problema)”] into English, French, Spanish, German and other European languages, as well as various references to Uspenskij’s ideas on what nowadays would be categorized as ‘semiotics of history’, or thoughts at least in some way related to the ‘cultural-semiotic approach to history’ of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics.
2
Niu, Min, und Saengchan Hemchua. „Translation semiotics and semiosic translation: clarification of disciplinary intension and concept“. Chinese Semiotic Studies 18, Nr. 2 (01.05.2022): 205–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2022-2057.
Annotation:
Abstract The paper aims to clarify the distinction of intension and concept between translation semiotics and semiosic translation to determine their disciplinary classification as well as the theoretical framework of translation semiotics. Translation semiotics is a relatively young interdisciplinary field connecting specifically semiotics and translation studies. In essence, it is a branch of semiotics where the research object is the semiotic transformations and sign activities involved in the translational semiosic and interpretive process. Semiosic translation attaches itself conceptually to an extended notion of semiosis involving the transformation of any sign system into other sign systems and pertains to the illustration and analysis of translational phenomena from the perspective of semiotics. Translation semiotics focuses on semiotic transformations and constructs a semiotic theory and application model based on the dimension of semiotic transformation. Both translation semiotics and semiosic translation take semiotic transformations as their research object. Notwithstanding, semiosic translation puts particular emphasis on semiosis, whereas translation semiotics explores the phenomena of semiotic transformations and related problems involved in the process of translation grounded on semiotic theories and methodology (Jia 2016a: 96). As such, translation semiotics and semiosic translation are under the jurisdiction of different disciplines.
3
Wang, Mingyu, und Jing Li. „The Historic Mission of Chinese Semiotic Scholars“. Chinese Semiotic Studies 14, Nr. 2 (25.05.2018): 137–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2018-0009.
Annotation:
Abstract Semiotics as a science of signs originated from Europe and America where France, the USA and Russia are acknowledged as the three epicenters for semiotics studies. Comparatively, in China, the conscious study of semiotics as an independent discipline started much later; yet, the traditional Chinese culture is imbued with bountiful semiotic resources. In response to the prospects of semiotics studies around the globe, how should China, with its deep-rooted traditional culture and unique semiotic resources, integrate itself with the world as a powerhouse in semiotics studies? How can it gain its access to the academic discourse of semiotics? What should it do to establish a school of semiotics studies featuring Chinese characteristics and to contribute to the world’s semiotics studies? These questions, which still remain to be answered, concern not only the process and progress of semiotics studies in China but the historic mission of Chinese semiotics as well. The paper highlights 12 semiotic spheres unique to China and six aspects of the academic philosophy of Chinese semiotics, hereby calling for long-term and sustained efforts to advance the progress of semiotics studies in China. And it is the authors’ belief that China’s bountiful semiotic resources and relevant research achievements will be a contribution to the world’s semiotics studies.
4
Makmur, Testiani, und Dafrizal Samsudin. „Perspektif semiotika dalam penelitian sain informasi dan kepustakaan di Indonesia“. Al-Kuttab : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan 2, Nr. 2 (30.11.2020): 11–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.24952/ktb.v2i2.2513.
Annotation:
ABSTRACTThis study aims to diagnose the application of semiotic perspectives in various forms of information and literature study in Indonesia. Literature-based literature that discusses semiotics consists of scientific work in information and literature science in Indonesia. The implications include (1) seen from anytime semiotics began to be studied by library and information science scholars, (2) then what was the increase from year to year, (3) how the epistemological development of the development of semiotic theories in accordance with library science and Indonesia, (4) as well as from many semiotic theories, which are dominantly used as a framework. ABSTRAKKajian ini bertujuan untuk mengdiagnosa penerapan perspektif semiotika dalam berbagai bentuk kajian sain informasi dan kepustakaan di Indonesia. Metodologi berbasis literature terutama yang berhubungan kajian semiotika berupa karya ilmiah dalam Sain informasi dan kepustakaan di Indonesia. Implikasinya antara lain (1) diketahui sejak kapan semiotika mulai dikaji oleh sarjana ilmu perpustakaan dan informasi,(2) lalu seperti apa peningkatannya dari tahun ketahun, (3) bagaimana perkembangan epistimologi terutama teori semiotik yang dikaitkan dengan ilmu perpustakaan dan Indonesia, (4) serta dari sekian banyak teori semiotika, yang mana dominan digunakan sebagai kerangka kerja.
5
Fomin, Ivan V., und Mikhail V. Ilyin. „Social Semiotics: Paths towards Integrating Social and Semiotic Knowledge“. Sociological Journal 25, Nr. 4 (2019): 123–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2019.25.4.6822.
Annotation:
This article outlines major trends in the development of social semiotics during the last four decades of its existence. The starting point was the interface between functional analysis of the semiotic system of language and the structural interpretation of language as a social system. Their convergence provided the basis for further developing an interdisciplinary domain of social semiotics. Michael Halliday’s book “Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning” (1978) gave an initial impetus to exploring the interface of semiotic and social. Ten years later his approach was reinterpreted by Bob Hodge and Gunther Kress in “Social Semiotics” (1988). They suggested that both the social and semiotic nature of language had a broader significance and extends to the entire domain of human activity and existence. Thus, social semiotic (in singular) of language was enhanced into all-embracing social semiotics (in plural). This article further examines linguistic as socio-semiotic, semiotic as social, semiotic as multimodal, socio-semiotic as functional, interpretative as socio-semiotic. The article outlines two frontiers of social semiotics, that of its subject matter and that of its methodological dimension. Finally, the article focuses on current challenges faced by social semiotics, particularly those relevant to sociology.
6
Juniati, Sri. „ANALISIS SEMIOTIKA DALAM KUMPULAN CERPEN PELANGI DI UJUNG SENJA KARYA RATIH AYUNINGRUM“. CENDEKIA: JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN 9, Nr. 2 (14.09.2021): 210–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.33659/cip.v9i2.205.
Annotation:
The aims of this research are To describe semiotics in the collection of short stories Pelangi di Ujung Senja by Ratih Ayuningrum. Describe the dominance of semiotics in the collection of short stories Pelangi di Ujung Senja by Ratih Ayuningrum.
The method used is a descriptive qualitative research method that describes semiotics in the collection of short stories Pelangi di Ujung Senja by Ratih Ayungingrum. Researchers as a key instrument. The collection of short stories Pelangi di Ujung Senja by Ratih Ayungrum as primary data and secondary data are books related to semiotic theory, literary theories, research methods and other books as supporting research.
The results of the research on the collection of short stories Pelangi di Ujung Senja by Ratih Ayuningrum, showed that Semiotics in the collection of short stories Pelangi di Ujung Senja contained four, namely index, sign, icon and gesture. While the type of semiotics that dominates in the collection of short stories Pelangi di Ujung Senja by Ratih Ayuningrum is the index type, with a total of 44 citations.
Kata Kunci: Semiotika, Cerpen.
7
Hébert, Louis. „Essais de définition du sémiotique, de la sémiotique et de l’interdisciplinarité“. Semiotica 2020, Nr. 234 (25.10.2020): 123–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0140.
Annotation:
AbstractThis article seeks to define what is semiotic and what is Semiotics. Provided first is a brief presentation of various perspectives of Semiotics. Pursuant to this, we will seek to uncover Semiotics’ particulars by evaluating various approaches. We will commence by framing the definitions of the word “Semiotic” to consider then Semiotics via eight particular anthropic – human-related – levels. This partition, derived by the author from a Rastier typology, defines the following levels: noumenophysical, phenophysical, semiotic, representational (“mental images” and concepts), sens (physical), felt (affects), cognitive other and transcendental. From here, we will consider the place of Semiotics among disciplines. Finally, the text presents a typology of relationship between disciplines, including semiotics: anadisciplinarity, disciplinarity, valodisciplinarity, intradisciplinary (such as intertheoricity), multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, metadisciplinarity).
8
Jiuhanteng, Markus, Acep Iwan Saidi und R. Drajatno Widi Utomo. „ANALISIS SEMIOTIKA POS STRUKTURAL PADA FOTO RHEIN II (A POST-STRUCTURAL SEMIOTICS ANALYSIS OF THE PHOTOGRAPH RHEIN II)“. Jurnal Seni dan Reka Rancang: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Desain 4, Nr. 1 (01.08.2021): 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jsrr.v4i1.10095.
Annotation:
<p>Abstract This paper is a study of Andreas Gursky’s photo Rhein II. In this study, the post-structural semiotic analysis method is used to interpret meaning based on signs on the Rhein II. The post-structural semiotic analysis becomes the basis for interpreting meanings using related references. In the study of Rhein II photo objects, visual text analysis is expected to provide positive benefits for the development of photography, especially academically. Rhein II is a photo by Andreas Gursky. In Rhein II’s photograph, a contemporary photo is presented as a multi-reality representation analyzed using the post-structural semiotic method. The object of research is interpreted as a text that has a layer of meaning that is squeezed out of its essence by semiotics. The deconstruction of the signification system in the visual element is identified by reading the structural postal semiotic theory codes: text analysis process, creation process. The results of semiotic extraction produce an interpretive study of Rhein II which is full of meaning.</p><p>Keyword: imagery, photography, semiotica</p><p>Abstrak Makalah ini merupakan kajian dari foto Rhein II karya Andreas Gursky. Dalam kajian ini digunakan metode analisis semiotika post struktural untuk menginterpretasikan makna berdasarkan tanda-tanda pada Rhein. Analisis semiotika post struktural menjadi landasan dalam menginterpretasikan makna-makna dengan menggunakan referensi terkait. analisis teks visual, dalam kajian objek foto Rhein II diharapkan dapat memberikan kebermanfaatan yang positif bagi perkembangan fotografi khususnya secara akademis. Rhein II adalah foto karya Andreas Gursky. Dalam karya Rhein II, sebuah foto kontemporer dihadirkan sebagai representasi multi realitas yang dianalisis menggunakan metode semiotika post struktural. Objek penelitian dimaknai sebagai teks yang memiliki lapisan makna yang terperas esensinya oleh semiotika. Dekonstruksi sistem penandaan dalam elemen visual diidentifikasikan dengan pembacaan kode-kode teori semiotika pos struktural. Proses analisis teks, proses penciptaan. Hasil ekstraksi semiotika menghasilkan kajian interpretatif Rhein II yang sarat makna.</p><p>Kata kunci: citra imaji, fotografi, semiotika</p>
9
Niu, Min, und Thawascha Dechsubha. „The semiotic dimension of contemporary pragmatics“. Technium Social Sciences Journal 27 (08.01.2022): 802–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v27i1.5651.
Annotation:
Contemporary Pragmatics has the semiotic features from the respects of disciplinary naming, the means of development, and theoretical source to research object and method. It is not only an independent linguistics and language science, but also an interdisciplinary field and paradigm. This paper is to explore the semiotic features and dimensions of Pragmatics for tracing back the origin and the theoretical resources from semiotic perspective, and to define its research scope and clarify the connotation of its conception. As Semiotics has a triad dimension of semiosis, one of which is the “pragmatic dimension”. Therefore, contemporary pragmatics includes at least three semiotic dimensions: scientific semiotics, linguistic semiotics and social semiotics. The semiotic analysis of Pragmatics could be conducive to clarify and fix the semiotic and philosophical origin, definition, disciplinary connotation and meaning of Pragmatics, which is also theoretically helpful for clarifying the concepts for the study of philosophical pragmatism, pragmaticism, semiotics, semantics and syntax.
Key Words: Semiotic, Pragmatics, Pragmaticism
10
Petrilli, Susan. „Learning and education in the global sign network“. Semiotica 2020, Nr. 234 (25.10.2020): 317–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0043.
Annotation:
AbstractThe contribution that may come from the general science of signs, semiotics, to the planning and development of education and learning at all levels, from early schooling through to university education and learning should not be neglected. As Umberto Eco claims in the “Introduction” to the Italian edition of his book Semiotica and Philosophy of Language (1984: xii, my trans.), “[general semiotics] is Semiotica e filosofia del linguaggio. Turin: Einaudi; in nature, because it does not study a particular system, but posits the general categories in light of which different systems can be compared. And for general semiotics philosophical discourse is neither advisable nor urgent: it is simply constitutive.” To the title of their book Semiotic Theory of Learning, at the centre of our attention in the present text, Andrew Stables, Winfried Nöth, Alin Olteanu, Sébastien Pesce, and Eetu Pikkarainen, rightly add the subtitle New Perspectives in the Philosophy of Education. This multivoiced contribution to research in learning and education in a semiotic framework has a unifying reference in the semiotics of Charles S. Peirce, but without disregarding an array of other distinguished exponents of the teaching and education sciences from different disciplines, semioticians and philosophers alike. This book, a polyphonic effort, with its appeal to “act otherwise,” and to do so investing in learning and education, no doubt makes a significant contribution in such a direction: education for transformation, for humanizing social change. Beyond evidencing what to us are particularly interesting aspects of the topics under discussion in Semiotic Theory of Learning, we also propose to continue and amplify this multivoiced dialogue. While highlighting still other aspects and contributions made by the same semioticians and philosophers presented by the authors of this book, involving such figures as Charles Peirce, Charles Morris, Thomas Sebeok, John Deely, etc., we have further introduced other voices made to resound throughout, whether directly or indirectly, like that of Victoria Welby, Mikhail Bakhtin, Emmanuel Levinas, Adam Schaff, Ferruccio Rossi-Landi, Marcel Danesi, Augusto Ponzio, and Genevieve Vaughan.
11
Dwi Fadhila, Pranindita, Chintya Almira und Aldi Priatmana. „Metode Penelitian Analisis Semiotik Media Sosial“. Dakwatussifa: Journal of Da'wah and Communication 1, Nr. 2 (28.12.2022): 131–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.56146/dakwatussifa.v1i2.56.
Annotation:
Semiotics or semiotics are terms that refer to the same science. Semiotics is commonly used by American scholars, although the term semiotics is more commonly used in Europe. Semiotics comes from the Greek word semeion, which means 'sign', or the English sign, which means 'signal'. Semiotics is known as a science that studies sign language systems such as languages, codes, signals, and human language. Semiotics is the science of symbols. To be able to read and interpret these symbols, we need "language". Meaning is formed through a structured system of linguistic differences. Meaning is generated through the process of selecting and combining symbols around two axes, the syntagmatic axis (linear, for example sentences) and the paradigm axis (the arena of symbols such as synonyms) which are arranged in a marking system. This symbol consists of a signifier (medium) and a symbol (meaning) (Saussure, 1960). The purpose of semiotic analysis is to find the meaning of symbols, including what is hidden behind them (text, advertisements, news). Keywords: history of semiotics, semiotics Roland Barthes, understanding of semiotics, semiotic figures, development of semiotics.
12
Feshchenko, Vladimir. „Gustav Shpet's deep semiotics: A science of understanding signs“. Sign Systems Studies 43, Nr. 2/3 (30.11.2015): 235–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2015.43.2-3.06.
Annotation:
The article examines the implicit tradition of deep semiotics in Russia initiated by Gustav Shpet, a Russian philosopher of language. Shpet’s semiotic approach was developed synchronously with the major lines of European and American semiotics (Saussurian and Peircean), but has not been sufficiently known or studied. The recent publication of previously unknown papers by Shpet makes this Russian philosopher an advanced figure on the Russian semiotic scene. Shpet was one of the first Russian scholars to use the term ‘semiotics’, by which he meant a “general ontological study of signs”. Shpet used this term in his work History as a Problem of Logic as early as in 1916. Shpet’s main work on semiotics, the book Language and Sense (1920s), traced back the origins of semiotic thinking and laid the foundations for new semiotics, by which he meant a science of understanding signs. It is here that Shpet spoke of the ontological study of a sign, calling this study semiotics, or else characterics, and raising the issue of the semiotic mind.
13
Lenninger, Sara. „Culture in the layers of contemporary discourses and historical archives: A review of Anna Maria Lorusso’s Cultural Semiotics“. Public Journal of Semiotics 8, Nr. 1 (13.02.2018): 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2017.8.17327.
Annotation:
In Anna Maria Lorusso’s book Cultural semiotics: For a cultural perspective in semiotics (Lorusso, 2015) the reader is offered an initiated review of key representatives of 20th century structuralism in semiotics and its entries into poststructuralism, with focus on method of analysis. Related to the theoretical discussions on semiotics and culture, Lorusso offers a series of case studies in semiotic analysis of cultural texts. In this review article, I discuss and evaluate the four strands in cultural semiotics suggested by Lorusso. Further, I draw implications for deciding on the themes and objects of studies in a semiotic realm that focuses on text.
14
Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov. „Legal Semiotics“. Matondang Journal 2, Nr. 1 (14.12.2022): 36–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.33258/matondang.v2i1.807.
Annotation:
The article reveals the concept of semiotics and the stages of its formation, as well as the semiotics of law; some concepts of semiotic-legal researches are analyzed; a forecast is given from the point of view of the application of semiotics of law in the future.
15
Falah, Zulfikar, und Miftahur Rohmah. „Aplikasi Semiotika Roland Barthes terhadap Makna Takwa dalam QS. al-Hajj [22]: 37“. Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur'an dan al-Hadits 17, Nr. 1 (30.06.2023): 119–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v17i1.15834.
Annotation:
AbstractThis article examines how Roland Barthes' semiotics can be used to understand the meaning of piety in QS. Al-Hajj: 37. The author's background involves the application of the definition of piety as it pertains to the role of the physical and spiritual as it has existed in humans. This study aims to ascertain the true meaning of the word "piety" as it appears in QS. Al-Hajj: 37 from a semiotic standpoint. The descriptive analysis used in this article's research was discovered through library research. Before helping one comprehend how Roland Barthes' semiotics can be applied to the meaning of piety in QS. Al-Hajj: 37. Following a description of Roland Barthes' semiotic theory, the author then discusses the meaning of "piety" in the Qur'an. When Roland Barthes' semiotics are applied to parse the meaning of piety in QS, it leads to the conclusion that there are two levels of the signification of Al-Hajj: 37. In summary, the relational interpretation between the signifiers lafaz al-taqwa and al-wiqayah has been known to be central to the denotative and connotative meanings of piety.Keywords: QS. al-Hajj: 37; Roland Barthes; Semiotics; The meaning of piety. AbstrakArtikel ini menganalisa tentang aplikasi semiotika Roland Barthes terhadap makna takwa dalam QS. al-H{ajj: 37. Latar belakang yang diambil penulis adalah implementasi makna takwa yang disebutkan telah melibatkan peran jasmani dan rohani sebagaimana telah bersemayam dalam diri manusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui makna hakiki terma takwa pada QS. al-H{ajj: 37 perspektif semiotika Roland Barthes. Metode penelitian dalam artikel ini menggunakan deskriptif analisis yang diperoleh melalui library research. Sebelum mengarah kepada pemahaman perihal aplikasinya semiotika Roland Barthes terhadap makna takwa dalam QS. al-H{ajj: 37, penulis memaparkan dahulu terkait teori semiotika Roland Barthes, dilanjutkan pembahasan terma takwa dalam al-Qur’an. Sehingga menghasilkan bahwa terdapat dua tingkatan signifikasi pada pengaplikasian semiotika Roland Barthes dalam mengurai makna takwa dalam QS. al-H{ajj: 37. Singkatnya, makna denotatif dan konotatif makna takwa telah diketahui terfokus pada interpretasi relasional antara lafaz al-taqwa sebagai penanda dan al-wiqayah sebagai petanda. Kata Kunci: Makna takwa; QS. al-H{ajj: 37; Roland Barthes; Semiotika.
16
Torop, Peeter. „Semiotics of cultural history“. Sign Systems Studies 45, Nr. 3/4 (31.12.2017): 317–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2017.45.3-4.07.
Annotation:
The interpretation of cultural history in the context of cultural semiotics, especially interpretation of semiotics of cultural history as a semiotics of culture, and semiotics of culture as a semiotics of cultural history, gives us, first, a deeper understanding of the analysability of cultural history and, at the same time, of the importance of history and different aspects of temporality for the semiotics of culture. Second, the history of the semiotics of culture, especially the semiotics of culture of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics, is an organic part of cultural history, while the self-presentation of the school via establishing explicit and implicit contacts with the heritage of Russian theory (the Formalist School, the Bakhtin circle, Vygotskij, Eisenstein etc) was already a semiotic activity and an object of the semiotics of cultural history. Third, the main research object of semiotics of culture is the hierarchy of the sign systems of culture and the existent as well as historical correlations between these sign systems. Such conceptualization of the research object of semiotics of culture turns the latter into a semiotics of cultural history. Emphasizing the semiotic aspect of cultural history can support the development of semiotics of culture in two ways. First, semiotics of culture has the potential of conducting more in-depth research of texts as mediators between the audience and the cultural tradition. Second, semiotics of culture as a semiotics of cultural history can be methodologically used for establishing a new (chronotopical) theory of culture.
17
Zhu, Haoyun, und Guangxiang Rao. „2018 Annual Report of Chinese Semiotic Studies“. Signs and Media 1, Nr. 1 (25.08.2020): 5–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/25900323-12340002.
Annotation:
Abstract By analysing semiotic papers, works and academic conferences from 2018, this paper aims to describe the development of Chinese semiotics. During this year, the study of semiotics in China further advanced in the fields of Marxist semiotics, communication semiotics, cultural semiotics, ecological semiotics and art semiotics. Overall, theoretical explorations and the integration of applications became development trends in semiotics. Further, the traditional concept of semiotics gained new interpretations through the introduction of new methods and ideas. In turn, the ‘meaning’ attribute of semiotics provided a unique analytical perspective for cutting-edge topics such as artificial intelligence and ecological environments.
18
Chzhan, Yui. „To the description of semiotic theory in the tradition of Chinese Linguistics“. Litera, Nr. 4 (April 2021): 171–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2021.4.29612.
Annotation:
The Russian scholars often associate semiotics with such names as Ferdinand De Saussure, Charles Morris, Roland Barthes, who wrote a wide variety of works and significantly contributed to the formation of semiotics. Therefore, the Russian science has sound understanding of semiotics in Europe. In Asian regions, namely in China, semiotics is also one of the most popular trends. This article gives special attention to the formation and development of semiotics in the modern Chinese academic environment for the purpose of revealing and clarifying the key periods of study of semiotic theory, trends and directions of semiotic research, as well as the main works written by the Chinese authors from the perspective of semiotics. The author's special contribution into this research consists in introduction to the Russian linguistic paradigm of the process of formation of semiotics as an independent scientific direction within the Chinese academic environment. Description is provided to the three key periods of development and advancement of semiotic theories in China. The main trends and directions of research in the modern academic environment are explored. The article features the works of the prominent Chinese linguists – Yaping Huang and Hua Meng, who implemented the semiotic ideas into the study of ideographic writing. The article also examines the work of the renowned Chinese scholar Qian Guanlian, who studied the pragmalinguistic aspects from the perspective of semiotics, which allowed comprising a semiotic base of the communication theory and pragmatics, and thus made a significant contribution to further research of these trends.
19
Rozin, Vadim Markovich. „Semiotics as a philosophical and methodological, natural science and mathematical discipline (main stages of development and perspective)“. Философия и культура, Nr. 6 (Juni 2022): 66–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2022.6.38261.
Annotation:
The article examines the history of the development of the ideas of semiotics, from the works of St. Augustine to the present. The author shares the semiotic approach, which, judging by the literature, was formulated by Augustine, and semiotics as a scientific discipline, and in two versions, as an analogue of mathematics and natural science (we are talking about the "second nature", which is studied in the humanities and social sciences). The characteristic of the semiotic approach presented by Augustine in the scheme is given, which, the author shows, can be extended to various humanitarian objects (this is specifically demonstrated with respect to music). Based on the semiotic approach and classifications of signs, various variants of semiotics as a science were created in the XIX and XX centuries. The difference of scientific semiotics is explained: semiotics solved different problems and tasks, semiotically comprehended different subject areas, proceeded from a different understanding of science. Nevertheless, in all variants of semiotics, relations between the components of the sign were established. The semiotics reform project proposed by G.P. Shchedrovitsky is considered, and what came of it (another semiotics, and not the organization of different scientific semiotics on a single basis of the theory of activity). Based on the analysis of two cases (the semiotic analysis of the metaphor in the work of Meir Shalev "Esav" and the sculpture of Aphrodite Praxiteles), the author outlines another version of semiotics, which he calls "expressionism". Although the methodology proposed by him allows analyzing and comprehending a fairly wide range of expressions and works of art, the author suggests not to consider it universal.
20
Lawes, Rachel. „Science and semiotics: What’s the relationship?“ International Journal of Market Research 60, Nr. 6 (17.07.2018): 573–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470785318787944.
Annotation:
This article considers the relationship of semiotics to science. A history of semiotics is provided. Questions are addressed of whether semiotics is empirical and what is distinctive about semiotic approaches to the inbuilt challenges of science such as controlling for bias. These scientific matters are supplemented by a discussion of the use and purpose of art in semiotics. The second half of the article demonstrates semiotic technique by applying it to debates within the market research community over the scientific status of semiotics, behavioral economics, neuromarketing, and neuroscience. Provisional conclusions are drawn regarding the fate of new market research methods within these debates, and recommendations for further investigation are offered.
21
Wang, Mingyu, und Jing Li. „Translation Semiotics: The Disciplinary Essence“. Chinese Semiotic Studies 16, Nr. 3 (26.08.2020): 399–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2020-0022.
Annotation:
AbstractTranslation semiotics studies the transformation of signs in translation, which generally involves semiosis, sign behavior, sign relations, semiotic hierarchy, intersemiosis, semiotic function, and semiotic conservation. This paper attempts to explore, from these seven dimensions, the disciplinary essence of TS and foresees the development of this burgeoning discipline as a branch of semiotics.
22
Kull, Kalevi, Silvi Salupere, Peeter Torop und Mihhail Lotman. „The institution of semiotics in Estonia“. Sign Systems Studies 39, Nr. 2/4 (01.12.2011): 314–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2011.39.2-4.13.
Annotation:
The article gives a historical overview of the institutional development of semiotics in Estonia during two centuries, and describes briefly its current status. The key characteristics of semiotics in Estonia include: (1) seminal role of two world-level classics of semiotics from the University of Tartu, Juri Lotman and Jakob von Uexküll; (2) the impact of Tartu–Moscow school of semiotics, with a series of summer schools in Kääriku in 1960s and the establishment of semiotic study of culture; (3) the publication of the international journal Sign Systems Studies, since 1964; (4) the development of biosemiotics, notably together with colleagues from Copenhagen; (5) teaching semiotics as a major in bachelor, master, and doctoral programs in the University of Tartu, since 1994; (6) a plurality of institutions — in addition to the Department of Semiotics in the University of Tartu, several supporting semiotic institutions have been established since 1990s; and (7) a wide scope of research in various branches of semiotics, including theoretical studies, empirical studies, and applied semiotics projects on governmental and other request.
23
Jia, Hongwei. „Semiospheric translation types reconsidered from the translation semiotics perspective“. Semiotica 2019, Nr. 231 (26.11.2019): 121–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0151.
Annotation:
AbstractDue to the logical problems of unclear boundaries, staggered parallels, disordered standard, etc., existing in Jakobson’s intralingual, interlingual, and intersemiotic translations, the first triadic division of translation in terms of semiotics has been criticized since the 1980s. However, most of the previous semiotic research in China and the world at large still stays on the interlingual translation (in the narrow sense) of literary texts, neglecting semiotic transformations as a sign activity and semiosis between tangible signs and intangible ones in the same and/or different period(s) of time, within the same ethnic culture or across the distinctive ethnic cultures. Hereby, it is necessary to refer to and redefine the term “semiosphere” introduced by Yuri Lotman in 1984 and the literatures after, to revise intrasemiospheric translation, intersemiospheric translation, and suprasemiospheric translation introduced in Jia(2016b. A translation-semiotic perspective of Jakobson’s tripartite of translation. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 5. 11–18; Jia 2017. Roman Jakobson’s triadic division of translation revisited. Chinese Semiotics Studies 13(1). 31–46), and to elaborate on their nature, structure, content, and connotative significance. This is not only conducive to building translation semiotics as a subfield of general semiotics, but also to broadening the theoretical visions of applied semiotics and translation studies, and verifying the theoretical validity of general semiotics and translation semiotics in interpreting and explaining the semiotic transformations in translation as a special sign activity.
24
Barreto, E. Israel Chávez, und Donald Favareau. „Introducing Paul Cobley: a graphic guide“. Chinese Semiotic Studies 19, Nr. 1 (01.02.2023): 3–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2022-2099.
Annotation:
Abstract Within the discipline of semiotics, written text remains the primary mode of communication and analysis, despite the fact that, as all good semioticians know, signs occur in all modalities – which is why we think of artists and musicians, no less than novelists and poets, as applied semioticians par excellence. In 1997, Paul Cobley and Litza Jansz combined the semiotic tools of words and drawings to produce what is undoubtedly one of the most successful and influential texts for the dissemination of semiotic theory: the illustrated graphic guide called Semiotics for beginners (later published as Introducing semiotics). On the occasion of this well-deserved festschrift honoring Paul’s life of work in semiotics, the authors felt it most appropriate to pay homage to Paul – and to the graphic guide with which he has inspired countless readers across the world to better understand the fundamentals of semiotics – by once again combining the semiotic tools of words and drawings to illustrate the ideas and history of this master semiotician.
25
Torop, Peeter. „Semiotics of mediation. Theses“. Sign Systems Studies 40, Nr. 3/4 (01.12.2012): 547–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2012.3-4.15.
Annotation:
Semiotics of mediation is based on comparative analysis of mediation processes, on typology of forms of mediation and on the subsequent complementary analysis of culture. Not only does cultural analysis that is based on semiotics of mediation proceed from communication processes, it also searches for possibilities of correlation between concepts of describability, analysability, translatability. Depending on the strategy of mediation semiotics it is possible to create an overview of the main parameters of cultural analysis and to specify the boundaries of semiotic analysis of culture. The main types of mediation are simultaneously parameters of cultural analysis. The main types include autocommunicative mediation, metalingual mediation, intertextual mediation, interdiscursive mediation, and inter- or transmedial mediation. Typology of mediation types facilitates the understanding of the autocommunicative aspect of culture and creates the basis for analysing communication processes not on the level of the immediate sender and receiver but as part of the culture’s communication with itself. Semiotics of mediation starts from semiotic mediation and ends with a culture of mediation in which one and the same cultural language or text operates as a means of dialogue with itself, as a means of communication with others, as part of some textual system or discourse, or as a transmedial phenomenon. Semiotics of mediation is a means of studying the correlation between implicit semiotic mediation and forms of explicit semiotic mediation, thus complementing cultural semiotic study of culture.
26
Lagopoulos, Alexandros Ph. „A meta-theoretical approach to the history and theory of semiotics“. Semiotica 2016, Nr. 213 (01.11.2016): 1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0100.
Annotation:
AbstractThe object of this paper is the domain of semiotic theories, from “traditional” semiotics to poststructuralism and postmodernism, excluding “semiotizing” approaches such as phenomenology or cultural studies. Thus, it is metatheoretical. It is based on two matrices. The first maps semiotic theories on the basis of the continuity or discontinuity between them. The second displays the logical categories of the relationship between semiotics and Marxism, which has historically been an important influence on the field. The paper presents the views of the main authors of the domain in terms of these two matrices. Some of the conclusions are: (a) the irreconcilability between Saussurean and Peircean semiotics; (b) the greater historical development of the former in comparison to the latter; (c) the different orientation between Central and Eastern European semiotics on the one hand and French semiotics on the other; (d) the strong influence of Saussure and Levi-Straussian structuralism on poststructuralism; (e) the increase of the influence of Marxism from structuralism to poststructuralism; and (f) the transformation from poststructuralism to North American postmodernism.The paper closes with some thoughts about the present status of the main semiotic currents and a proposal for a fertile future orientation for semiotics.
27
Sless, David. „Reading semiotics“. Information Design Journal 4, Nr. 3 (01.01.1986): 179–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/idj.4.3.01sle.
Annotation:
This paper presents a general and non-technical overview of semiotics and its recent history. The importance of Peirce and Saussure as founding fathers of contemporary semiotics is discussed and the debate they precipitated is mapped out including some of the peculiar characteristics of semiotics as a field of study. Some advice is given on how to read semiotic research, emphasising its contribution as an art rather than as a science. Some emphasis is placed on the specific contribution of semiotics to our understanding of the political nature of all communication.
28
Yu, Hongbing. „Editorial: What is semiotics but a series of modeling“. Chinese Semiotic Studies 17, Nr. 4 (01.11.2021): 467–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2021-2032.
Annotation:
Abstract The present issue of Chinese Semiotic Studies is published in memory of Thomas A. Sebeok. Sebeok was not only a master semiotician, but more importantly a grand artist in semiotics. As one of the most important contemporary figures in semiotics, linguistics, ethnology, and cultural studies, Sebeok made profound contributions to the progress of global semiotics through his distinguished theoretical achievements and promotional activities. His works have proven to be so relevant that they continue to exert a determinative influence and provide directions for the development of semiotics and its many subdivisions, especially biosemiotics, beyond the 20th century. Now, 21 years into the present century, during which semiotic studies around the world have made remarkable progress, it is about time to highlight some specific ways in which his contributions will continue to shape and guide semiotic studies, demonstrating the relevance of these contributions to the 21st century challenges. To this end, this special issue presents some up-to-date and informed studies that explore Sebeok’s contributions to semiotics and their vital implications for fundamental problems relevant to humanity as a semiotic animal in the present day and in the rest of this century and beyond.
29
Houser, Nathan. „Semiotics and Philosophy“. American Journal of Semiotics 36, Nr. 1 (2020): 135–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ajs202082764.
Annotation:
Semiotics has not been warmly welcomed as an area of research concentration within philosophy, especially not within philosophy in the English empirical tradition. But when we consider that much of the focus of semiotic research is signification, reference, and representation, it seems evident that semiotic questions are as old as reflective thought itself. A look at how these questions have been treated throughout the history of philosophy suggests that Umberto Eco was right in claiming that most major philosophers have grappled with sign theory, if only implicitly. The theory of signs was an active area of research during the Middle Ages and John Locke opened the Modern Age with the recommendation that semiotics should be cultivated. But the philosophers of Modernity embraced a Cartesian separation between mind and body unsupportive of a robust science of signs. When semiotics emerged as a discrete field of research in the writings of Charles S. Peirce and in the semiology of Ferdinand de Saussure, it remained on the fringes of philosophy. Around mid-20th century there was a resurgence of interest in semiotics and a promising attempt was made to merge American pragmatism and semiotics with the logical empiricism of the Vienna Circle. But that effort failed and semiotics was excluded from mainstream philosophy. There is now reason to suppose that philosophy, no longer under the domination of analytic philosophy, may be moving into a new period when a weakening commitment to epistemological nominalism will make room for a return to semiotic realism. Perhaps the time is right to follow Locke’s lead and to reconcile formal semiotics with philosophy—possibly heralding a new paradigm.
30
Zainuddin, Zainuddin. „SEMIOTIK DALAM TATARAN SEMANTIK (SEMIOTICS INTERPRETING MEANING)“. BAHAS 32, Nr. 1 (30.03.2021): 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.24114/bhs.v32i1.25680.
Annotation:
This article deals with semiotics and semantics. In other words, this article discussing about semiotics Interpreting meaning. Semiotics as the linguistic sain concerning the two important aspects which cannot be seperated, namely the signfied and signifier, since each have different meaning to be considered. De Saussure called the concept “signfie’,” (meaning) “signifiant”, or “signifier” (form). These two sides are so intimately related that they can be compared to a piece of paper. Since it is impossible to cut one sides of the paper without cutting the other. This concept can be interpreted that meaning (signified) is realized in form (signifier) as semiotics of language expression. It means that semiotics of language consis of 3 components namely, meaning, form and expression. Where is meaning as semiotic sign and form as lexicogrammar, an expression refers to phonology, graphology, of sign. Keywords : Semiotics, Meaning
31
Mouratidou, Eleni. „De la sémiotique de la représentation théâtrale à l’anthropologie culturelle: Pourquoi le théâtre (résiste)? — From the semiotics of theatrical representation to cultural anthropology or why theater (resists)?“ Sign Systems Studies 34, Nr. 2 (31.12.2006): 527–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2006.34.2.14.
Annotation:
From the semiotics of theatrical representation to cultural anthropology or why theater (resists)? In this paper I propose an epistemological approach to the field of theatre semiotics from the beginning of the 20th century to our days. Firstly, I point out two different periods that have influenced theatre semiotics. The first one centres on reflections and studies by the Prague School of Structuralism. More precisely, I address Jan Mukařovsky’s essays about art and society as well as Jindrich Honzl’s contributions to the study of sign and system in theatre. The second period presented here is that of theatre semiotics in the early 70s and late 80s in France. My goal here is to expose the main reasons that led theatre semiotics to a deadlock in the early 90s. Theatre semiotic research has been rich and fruitful in the beginning of last century. However, in our days it is generally deemed unadvisable to describe theatre representation in terms of sign and system. Although theatre semiotics used to be presented in French university classes, it is no longer possible to do so. Even though general semiotics has progressed by denying the importance of structure and by refusing to search for the minimal sign and its code, theatre semiotics has remained faithful to old communicational semiotics research. Throughout my contribution, I would like to examine the kind of semiotic field best fit to approaching an artistic domain such as theatre. In other words, I would like to show that Western theatre, granted it can be seen as a semiotic object, is first and foremost an artistic and cultural one. In order to do so, I propose a theoretical and methodological framework based on a specific semiotic model: the “indicial semiology” proposed by Anne-Marie Houdebine. Inspired by Juri Lotman’s essays about culture and art, I will try to set “indicial semiology” in the general field of a cultural anthropology.
32
Swandhani, Ahmad Riyadi, Deddy Wahjudi und Lukitaningsih Lukitaningsih. „SEMIOTIKA ROLAND BARTHES SEBAGAI PENDEKATAN UNTUK MENGKAJI LOGO KANTOR POS“. Gorga : Jurnal Seni Rupa 12, Nr. 1 (30.06.2023): 182. http://dx.doi.org/10.24114/gr.v12i1.43650.
Annotation:
Semiotics is a language of signs, semiotics is widely used as a tool to translate something, one of which is the post office logo, the purpose of this study is to see how the semiotic language developed by Roland Barthes can represent the post office logo in the form of a bird and lines and colors. unified, Roland Barthes theorized semiotics is between signs and signs, besides that there are also levels in the meaning of this semiotic theory, this research approach is Semiotic analysis is a qualitative data analysis technique whose goal is to find or systematically analyze symbols or signs in a text , from the results of this study there is a distortion of myth, as a marker is a dove which has a meaning or a sign that a bird has a strong myth as a means of sending letters in historical times, so that the use of Roland Barthes' semiotics can analyze the semiotic language of a h the post office logo, the thing that must be emphasized is the important role of the reader, in the sense that the meaning of a work depends on the person who is of course influenced by many factors both internal and external.Keywords: semiotics, roland barthes, post office. AbstrakSemiotika merupakan Bahasa tanda, semiotika banyak digunakan sebagai alat untuk menerjemahkan sesuatu, salah satunya ialah logo kantor pos, tujuan penelitian ini ialah melihat bagaimana Bahasa semiotika yang di kembangkan oleh roland barthes ini, dapat merepresentasikkan logo kantor pos yang berupa burung dan garis Tarik serta warna yang tersatukkan , roland barthes berteori semiotika ialah antara tanda dan pertanda, disamping itu juga ada tingkatan dalam pemaknaan dari teori semiotika ini, pendekatan penelitian ini ialah Analisis semiotika adalah teknik analisis data kualitatif yang tujuannya untuk menemukan atau menganalisis secara sistematis simbol atau tanda dalam sebuah teks, dari hasil peneltian ini terdapat distorsi pada mitos, sebagai penanda ialah burung merpati yang memiliki makna atau pertanda burung memiliki mitos yang kuat ikatannya sebagai alat pengiriman surat pada zaman sejarah, sehingga penggunaan semiotika roland barthes dapat menganalisis Bahasa semiotika dari sebuah logo kantor pos, hal yag harus ditekankan ialah pentingnya peran dari pembaca, dalam artian pemaknaan suatu karya tergantung dari personal yang tentunya dipengaruhi oleh banyak faktor baik internal ataupun eksternal.Kata Kunci: semiotika, roland barthes, kantor pos. Authors:Ahmad Riyadi Swandhani : Institut Teknologi BandungDeddy Wahjudi : Institut Teknologi BandungLukitaningsih : Universitas Negeri MedanReferences:Aulia, F., Afriawan, H., & Faisal, D. (2022). Konsistensi Logo Dalam Membangun Sistem Indentitas. Gorga: Jurnal Seni Rupa,11(2), 439-444.Barthes, R. (1964). Rhetoric of the Image. Communication 4, 40-51.Barthes, R. (1967). Element of Semiology. New York: Hill & Wang.Barthes, R. (1972). Mytholgies: New York The Noonday Press Cooper, J.C (2013). An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Traditional Symbols. London: Thames & Hudson.Barthes, R. (2010). Membedah Mitos-Mitos Budaya Massa. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.Saussure, F. D. (1988). Course in General Linguistics. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada Univesity Press.Direktorat Jendral Pos dan Telekomunikasi. (1980). Sejarah Pos dan Telekomunikasi di Indonesia Jilid IV Masa Demokrasi Terpimpin. Jakarta: Cahaya Makmur.Gunalan, S., & Hasbullah, H. (2020). Analisis pemaknaan semiotika pada karya iklan layanan masyarakat. Jurnal Nawala Visual, 2(2), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.35886/nawalavisual.v2i2.117.Gunalan, S., Haryono, H., & Yasa, I. N. M. (2022). Analisis Pemaknaan dan Tanda Pada Desain Logo GP Mandalika Series. Gorga: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 11(1), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.24114/gr.v11i1.34285Hartoko, D. (1991). Manusia dan Seni. Jakarta: Kansius.Khairi, A. I., & Hafiz, A. (2022). Kajian Estetika Lukisan Realis Kontemporer Drs. Irwan, M. Sn. yang Berjudul di Ujung Tanduk. Gorga: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 11(1), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.24114/gr.v11i2.39802.Liliweri, A. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.Linschoten, J., & Mansyur. (1983). Pengantar Ilmu Jiwa. Bandung: Jemmars.Miswar, M., Rian, R., Muler, Y., & Rajudin, R. Studi Warna Dan Gaya Pada Karya Yazid. Gorga: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 11(2), 370-378. https://doi.org/10.24114/gr.v11i2.38384.Mudjiyanto, B., & Nur, E. (2013). Semiotics In Research Method of Communication [Semiotika Dalam Metode Penelitian Komunikasi]. Jurnal Pekommas, 16(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2013.1160108.Piliang, Y. A. (2004). Semiotika Teks: Sebuah Pendekatan Analisis Teks. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 5(2), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v5i2.1156.Prang, L. (1876). The Theory of Colour. Boston: Massachusetts.Purbasari, M., & Jakti, R. A. (2014). Warna Dingin Si Pemberi Nyaman. Humaniora 5(1), 357. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v5i2.1156.Richards, J., Platt, J., & Weber , H. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.Rustan, S. (2009). Mendesain Logo. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Tinarbuko, & Sumbo. (2008). Semiotika Komunikasi Visual. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.Zakiy, R. A. (2020). Analisis Semiotika Iklan Cetak LA Lights "Jangan mau diadu" Versi Ayam. Gorga: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 9(2), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.24114/gr.v9i2.19551.
33
Khajrulina, Nailia. „Judas Iscariot’s Semiotic Image in Ukrainian Literature at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century“. Perspektywy Kultury 28, Nr. 1 (01.03.2020): 37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.35765/pk.2020.2801.06.
Annotation:
The article under consideration is devoted to the semiotic analyses of the biblical apostle Judas Iscariot, one of the most contradictory religious characters. The article demonstrates the semiotic paradigm of Judas, including portrait semiotics (paleness, timidity, secrecy and slouch), gesture semiotics (abrupt movements) and symbolic semiotics (hopelessness, suicide). The research stresses the aspect of venality. It is proved that Judas Iscariot became the archetype of venality not only in literature, but in art generally. The article’s summary will be used for students learning literary criticism and philologists.
34
Jia, Hongwei. „Foundations of the Theory of Signs (1938)“. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15, Nr. 1 (25.02.2019): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0001.
Annotation:
Abstract “Foundations of the theory of signs,” published by Charles W. Morris in 1938, deals with the relations between semiotics and science, and those between semiosis and semiotics, among others. Compared with previous research regarding the aspects of semiotics being meta-science, the three dimensions of semiosis, semiotic as organon of the sciences, etc., this article does push forward the development of linguistics and semiotics since the late 1930s. However, its discussions on semiotics being meta-science, the nature and classification of signs, the three dimensions of semiosis, organism in the sign relations, universals and universality of signs, and thing-language are either not logically rigid or inadequate in content and scope. For a piece of work discussing the theoretical foundations of signs, it does not consider sign transformation, a universal and ubiquitous sign activity, which is not consistent with the keyword “foundations” in its title. A critical analysis of these problems involving the aspects mentioned above may not only enrich the visions of triadic sign relations, semiotics, and translation semiotics, but also inspire future semiotic studies and even other new research related to signs.
35
Zengiaro, Nicola. „From biosemiotics to physiosemiotics. Towards a speculative semiotics of the inorganic world.“ Linguistic Frontiers 5, Nr. 3 (01.12.2022): 37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/lf-2022-0019.
Annotation:
Abstract In the first part of the article, biosemiotics will be presented in its historical and theoretical dynamics. New areas of research that have emerged in the speculative field of biosemiotics, such as ecosemiotics, will be explored. In all its developments, biosemiotics, which identifies semiosis with life, excludes inorganic matter from any semiotics processes. However, the inorganic world is a fundamental part of the biosphere, especially if we consider the emergence of life. In order to include inorganic matter within semiotic processes of the biosphere we will use James Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesis reinterpreted in the light of semiotics. If we use the hypothesis of planet Earth as a living system in its complexity and if we consider that every living system is intrinsically semiotic, then inorganic matter must also participate in semiotics processes. In this sense, the semiotics of the inorganic world reveals that it participates in a sort of non-human agency. This type of speculative semiotics engages semiotics processes that are constitutive of matter and that can be read as the story of the planet itself. In conclusion, I will propose a physiosemiotics as semiotics of matter.
36
Wang, Binhua. „Exploring Approaches to Interpreting Studies“. Chinese Semiotic Studies 14, Nr. 2 (25.05.2018): 149–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2018-0010.
Annotation:
AbstractThis article explores the relevance of semiotic perspectives on and approaches to Interpreting Studies. Interpreting can be perceived as textual (re)production, as communicative interaction, and as a sociocultural activity, and can be studied in the linguistic and structural approach at the micro-dimension, the pragmatic and communicative approach at the meso-dimension, and in the sociocultural approach at the macro-dimension respectively. Different degrees of applicability can be identified in structural semiotics, interpretive semiotics, and social semiotics. Multimodal analysis integrating linguistic semiotics, paralinguistic semiotics, and non-linguistic semiotics is identified as having great potential in examining the communicative process of interpreting in its entirety.
37
Dondero, Maria Giulia. „Visual semiotics and automatic analysis of images from the Cultural Analytics Lab: How can quantitative and qualitative analysis be combined?“ Semiotica 2019, Nr. 230 (25.10.2019): 121–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0104.
Annotation:
AbstractIn this article we explore the relationship between semiotic analysis of images and quantitative analysis of vast image corpora, in particular the work produced by Lev Manovich and the Cultural Analytics Lab, called “Media Visualization.” Media Visualization has been chosen as corpus because of its metavisual operation (images are visualized and analyzed by images) and its innovating way of conceiving analysis: by visual instruments. In this paper semiotics is used as an approach to Media Visualization and taken as an object of study as well, especially visual semiotics. In this sense, a comparison between visual semiotics (close reading of small corpora) and quantitative analyses of images (distant reading of vast collections) are conducted from a semiotic point of view. Post-Greimassian semiotics guides this study with respect to the issue of the image-within-an-image and metavisual visualization; Peircean semiotics is employed to explain and develop the notion of diagram.
38
Ilyin, Mikhail V. „On multiple semiotics integrally, aspectively and concretely“. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 14, Nr. 4 (2023): 125–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2023-4-7.
Annotation:
Anton Zimmerling’s interpretation of the discursive particle TI1 is an important achievement. The article considers possibilities used by Zimmerling to interpret TI1 as a discursive particle, enclitic, part of speech and semantic sign. In addition, the article discusses its interpretation as a pragmatic marker. The author comments on the interpretations of semiotics by Zimmerling, in particular, the question of primary and secondary semiotic systems. The author presents his own concept of semiotics as a research programme in Imre Lakatos’ sense. Semiotics is also a kind of cognitive ability common to many forms of life and at the same time a system of epistemological and methodological possibilities for carrying out scientific research on meaning-making or semiosis built on this ability. Moreover, semiotics is not only a research programme, but a transdisciplinary integrative organon. Such universal complexes for integrating the capabilities of scientific knowledge are based on three basic cognitive abilities — (1) to perceive signals, to rank and to process them; (2) to recognize patterns (signal configurations) and shape them into more complex formations; (3) assessing and utilizing the meaning (initially functional significance, relevance) of the forms and modes of actuality. The latter ability is precisely the basis of semiotics and semiosis. The first two are metretics or organon for computational mathematics and statistics, as well as morphetics or organon for a wide variety of morphologies, comparative studies, discrete mathematics, topology, etc.
39
Lagopoulos, Alexandros Ph, und Karin Boklund-Lagopoulou. „Semiotics, culture and space“. Sign Systems Studies 42, Nr. 4 (30.12.2014): 435–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2014.42.4.02.
Annotation:
Space, in the environmental sense, holds a rather marginal position in semiotics. We shall try, however, to show in this paper that its importance is greater than thought previously, not only because it may establish one of the main sub-fields of semiotic research, but also because it has repercussions on other semiotic systems and even semiotic theory as such. We start by reviewing the main positions of the Theses of the Tartu-Moscow School and compare them to Lotman’s concept of the semiosphere. We conclude that a sociologically sound framework for culture is missing and try to demonstrate that culture is not the only factor composing a society, but there also exists a concept of a material, extra-semiotic society. This framework is systematically developed in relation to geographical space in our second section. We examine the place of space in semiotics according to two different axes of analysis. Th e first axis, discussed in our third section, corresponds to the semiotics of (geographical) space. We approach this field from two different perspectives. The first perspective is the direct study of urban space as a text, that is, it is focused on space-as-text. Three case studies are discussed, all drawn from pre-capitalist societies: the semiotic urban model in ancient Greece, the Ethiopian military camp and the spatial organization of the traditional Libyan oases. To the second perspective corresponds the semiotic study of the geographical spaces constructed by literary texts, that is, space-in-text. Here, we discuss two case studies: the ideal Platonic city and the medieval Arthurian courtly romances. These analyses are followed by an overview of the semiotics of space in pre-capitalist societies, to which we compare Lotman’s views.The second axis, discussed in our fourth section, concerns the importance of space for semiotic theory. We show that space can serve as a tool for the analysis of texts from other semiotic systems and focus on the use of space by different spatial metalanguages.
40
Soga, Zainuddin, Mardan Mardan, Achmad Tola, Amrah Kasim und Kamaluddin Abunawas. „THE APPLICATION OF THE SEMIOTICS OF QUR’AN TOWARD THE STORY OF THE CHOSEN SERVANTS IN SURAH MARYAM“. Jurnal Diskursus Islam 9, Nr. 2 (28.08.2021): 320. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/jdi.v9i2.22868.
Annotation:
This study elaborates the application of semiotic theory in Surah Maryam (Maryam). This study is library research. The library research was conducted through various literature studies related to the problem investigated. The approach used is a semiotic approach. The data sources are divided into two; primary and secondary data. The primary data source is the Qur'an (surah Maryam) and the secondary data sources are books of interpretation, semiotics and linguistics. The data collection is done by quoting, adapting, and analyzing the representative literature and relevant to the problems discussed, then reviewing and concluding. The study results showed three forms of semiotic application in Surah Maryam: first, semiotics of significance from Ferdinand de Saussure's (synchronic-diachronic theory). Second, semiotics of communication from Charles S. Peirce's includes iconic, indexical, and symbolic theories. Third, connotative semiotics from Roland Barthes' which consists of denotative meaning and connotative meaning. This study implies that the semiotic reading of the Qur’an prioritizes the interpretation of the text in a synchronic and diachronic, denotative and connotative way. Hopefully, by this reading, religious and Islamic moderation could be achieved.
41
Khrenov, Nikolai Andreyevich. „S.M. Eisenstein’s Aesthetics in Semiotic Perspective“. Journal of Flm Arts and Film Studies 7, Nr. 1 (15.03.2015): 8–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/vgik718-25.
Annotation:
The article is devoted to the semiotic interpretation of the theoretical heritage of S.M. Eisenstein, the film maker who anticipated the structuralist approach which has been so popular from the 1960s. Back in the 1960s, Eisensteins heritage attracted the attention of Academician Vyacheslav Ivanov because he found there he found a trend for understanding cinema as a language or, to be more precise, as a semiotic system. Vyacheslav Ivanov could not but notice it, as the formation of semiotics methodology in Russia is associated with his name. No wonder that he would reflect on the background of art semiotics which in the sphere of motion pictures is associating with the name of S.M. Eisenstein. While trying to appreciate the significance of Vyacheslav Ivanovs research of Eisensteins aesthetics, the author is contemplates on the application of semiotics methodology to the cinema as a semiotic system. In this regard the article is reproducing the aura of devotion to semiotics of domestic film scholars. When explaining the meaning of the title of Ivanovs book on S. Eisenstein, the author argues that the concept of semiotics was initially developed on the stage of the formation of aesthetics as a philosophical science.
42
Barnham, Chris. „Qualitative semiotics: Can we research consumer meaning-making?“ International Journal of Market Research 61, Nr. 5 (23.05.2019): 478–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470785319851317.
Annotation:
The notion of “meaning” is central to marketing because it is only through the making of meaning that “added value” can be created. The marketing profession has several models of how such meaning is created, but Peircean semiotics can shed further light on the activity of meaning-making itself and the stages that are involved in this process. This article explores the differences between Peircean and Saussurian semiotics and discusses how these two semiotic traditions construe meaning creation. In particular, it applies the Peircean semiotic model of meaning-making to the notion of concept formation, and the classificatory aspects of this process. This enables convergences to be identified between qualitative research methodologies and semiotics. This, in turn, opens up the possibility of a new kind of qualitative research that understands, and explores, how individual consumers form their concepts. It does this by identifying the semiotic structures that are involved in this process. It will be argued that the resulting framework of “Qualitative Semiotics” has the potential to take semiotics beyond the remit of cultural analysis and to refocus it on processes of individual consumer cognition.
43
Samsul Maulana Hasanudin. „Analisis Semiotika Dalam Puisi “Bunga Gugur” Karya W.S. Rendra“. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya 1, Nr. 5 (14.10.2023): 54–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v1i5.86.
Annotation:
Poetry is a literary work that contains meaning written in beautiful words that are aesthetic and expressive. Poetry has a physical and mental structure that can be felt by readers and listeners. Apart from that, in a poetry, there are several markers, either in the form of meaning that needs to be translated by the reader himself or linguistic markers that do not require reinterpretation so that the meaning of the poem will be conveyed from the writer to the reader or listener. The field of study that studies and examines markers, symbols and signals in a field of study is called semiotics. Semiotics is a scientific study that studies the signs in a literary work. Literary activists need to understand semiotics, because a poem definitely contains markers as an aesthetic literary work. Semiotics is very important in providing an overview and understanding of poetry to readers and listeners. That's why semiotics is very important to study and understand, because language and semiotics cannot be separated. The semiotic analysis of the poem "Flower Autumn" has been carried out qualitatively descriptively. Semiotic analysis was carried out on several lines that had words that were interesting to interpret. From the semiotic analysis of the poem "Flower Autumn" by W.S Rendra, readers can conclude that the poem tells the story of a love that is lost when their partner dies.
44
Eddahbi, Mohamed. „Semiotics... Introduction to "Signs Computing"“. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences 50, Nr. 6 (30.11.2023): 10–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i6.6517.
Annotation:
Objectives: Figuring out the importance of the semiotic perspective in computing signs. in addition to setting up databases that can be invested in designing flexible applications of the automated diacritization, automated translation.
Methods: It is designed as follows a theoretical part dedicated to evoking some of the manifestations of the flexibility of semiotics, as well as mentioning some studies that have taken semiotics as their general framework for analysis, such as kinaesthetics and computational semiotics. An applied part in which a model based on semiotic concepts is presented to set up a synthetic database for the Arabic language, the automated diacritization as a model.
Results: With its theoretical concepts and applied procedures, semiotics can serve as a basic entry for signs computing.
Conclusions: The study recommends researchers to evoking semiotics during the automated processing of the Arabic language and its culture, both theoretical and applied, to overcome the inadequacies of the Arabic language applications and software.
45
Hanafi, Wahyu. „HIPERSEMIOTIKA (Kritik Nalar Semiotika sebagai Teori Dusta dalam Reinterpretasi Qur'anic Studies)“. QOF 3, Nr. 1 (15.06.2019): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.30762/qof.v3i1.1029.
Annotation:
Abstrak; Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan distorsi semiotika sebagai teori dusta dalam reinterpretasi Qur’anic Studies. Dalam pandangan Umberto Eco, semiotika adalah sebuah disiplin ilmu yang mempelajari segala sesuatu yang dapat digunakan untuk berdusta. Artinya adalah, antara yang dikatakan atau yang ditulis dalam kajian semiotik tidak sesuai dengan realitas. Terdapat hubungan yang tidak simetris antara tanda dan realitas. Terdapat jurang yang dalam antar sebuah tanda (sign) dan referensinya pada realitas (referent). Konsep, isi, atau makna dari apa yang dibicarakan atau ditulis tidak sesuai dengan realitas yang dilukiskan. Pada tahap interpretasi teks al-Qur’an diperlukan pendekatan sinkronik guna mengetahui kesejarahan makna agar makna al-Qur’an dapat dipahami secara kontekstual. Aktualisasi semiotika sebagai pendekatan interpretasi al-Qur’an hanya menyentuh sisi luar ayat-ayat al-Qur’an secara tekstual dan menafikan kesejarahan makna. Maka peran semiotika dalam menginterpretasikan ayat-ayat al-Qur’an secara tekstual perlu ditinjau kembali. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa representasi tanda-tanda dalam al-Qur’an dengan menggunakan pendekatan semiotika menuai kedustaan yang berdasar pada prinsip perubahan dan transformasi, imanensi, permainan bahasa, dan simulasi.
Kata Kunci; Hipersemiotika, Dusta, al-Qur’an
Abstract; This study aims to describe the distortion of semiotics as a theory of lie in the reinterpretation of the Qur'anic Studies. In Umberto Eco's view, semiotics is a discipline that studies everything that can be used to lie. That is, between what is said or written in a semiotic study doesn't match with reality. There is an asymmetric relationship between signs and reality. There is a deep gulf between a sign and referent. The concept, content, or meaning of what is spoken or written does not fit the reality described. In the interpretation of the text of the Qur'an takes a synchronic approach to know the historic meaning so the meaning of the Qur'an can be understood contextually. The actualization of semiotics as an interpretation approach of the Qur'an only touches the outside of the verses of the Qur'an textually and denies the historical meaning. So the role of semiotics in interpreting the verses of the Qur'an textually needs to be reviewed. This method of this research using descriptive qualitative method. The results of this study indicate the representation of signs in the Qur'an using the semiotics approach reap a lie based on the principles of change and transformation, imanention, language games, and simulation.
Keywords; Hypersemiotics, Lie, al-Qur'an
46
Nadin, Mihai. „Semiotic Machine“. Public Journal of Semiotics 1, Nr. 1 (01.01.2007): 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8815.
Annotation:
A semiotic machine, no matter how it is embodied or expressed, has to reflect the various understandings of what the knowledge domain of semiotics is. It also has to reflect what methods and means support further acquiring knowledge of semiotics. Moreover, it has to express ways in which knowledge of semiotics is tested, improved, and evaluated. Given the scope of the endeavor of defining the semiotic machine, the methodological approach must be anchored in the living experience of semiotics. Accordingly, the cultural-historic perspective, which is the backbone of any encyclopedic endeavor, is very much like a geological survey for a foundation conceived from a dynamic perspective. The various layers could shed light on a simple aspect of the subject: At which moment in the evolution of semiotics does it make sense to make the association (in whatever form) to tools and to what would become the notion of a machine? Reciprocally, we would have to explain how the various understandings of the notions tool and machine are pertinent to whatever was the practice of semiotics at a certain juncture. Yet another reference cannot be ignored: The reductionist-deterministic view, celebrated in what is known as the Cartesian Revolution. Since that particular junction in our understanding of the world, the reduction of semiotic processes to machine descriptions is no longer a matter of associations (literal or figurative), but a normative dimension implicitly or explicitly expressed in semiotic theories. Given this very intricate relation, we will have to systematize the variety of angles from which various understandings of the compound expression semiotic machine can be defined.In our days, such understandings cover a multitude of aspects, ranging from the desire to build machines that can perform particular semiotic operations to a new understanding of the living, in view of our acquired knowledge of genetics, molecular biology, and information biology. That the computer—a particular form of machine—as an underlying element of a civilization defined primarily as one of information processing, could be and has been considered a semiotic machine deserves further consideration.
47
Thibault, Mattia. „Speculative Semiotics“. Linguistic Frontiers 5, Nr. 3 (01.12.2022): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/lf-2022-0012.
Annotation:
Abstract This paper introduces the notion of speculative semiotics as a scientific project within the larger umb- rella of speculative studies. The paper first provides a brief account of the projects of “nuclear semiotics” that investigated how to communicate across long periods of time. These efforts are then connected to the traditions of speculative design and design fiction, whose roots can be traced back to situationism and to Italian radical design. The synergy between semiotics and speculation is articulated around four main dimensions: communication with the future, communicating in the future, semiotics as a tool for speculation and speculation as an object of semiotics. To solidify its proposal, the paper presents a small semiotic speculation related to machine learning and image generation and an overview of the papers presented in this special issue. The conclusions reiterate the potential of this approach and outline a simple roadmap for the development of speculative semiotics.
48
Хайруліна, Наіля Фаритівна. „Семіотичні складові образу Юди Іскаріота (на прикладі творів Лесі Українки, Ольги Кобилянської, Віктора Домонтовича)“. Літератури світу: поетика, ментальність і духовність 7 (30.06.2016): 110–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/world_lit.v7i0.1122.
Annotation:
The article under consideration is devoted to the semiotic analyses of the biblical apostle Judah Iscariot. Being one of the most contradictory religious character, the image of Judah Iscariot is the actual subject of research. Our article demonstrates the semiotic paradigm of Judah from different points of view including portrait semiotics (paleness, timitidy, secrecy and slouch), gesture semiotics (abrupt movements)and symbol semiotics (hopelessness, suicide, treason for salvation). The research is stressed on the dualistic nature of Judah’s presentation starting from traditional betrayer and finishing the savior of society. The article’s summary will be used for students learning literary criticism and philologists
49
Karlander, David. „A semiotics of nonexistence?“ Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 5, Nr. 2 (22.07.2019): 198–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ll.18023.kar.
Annotation:
Abstract Spatially interested sociolinguistics has cared little about the semiotics of nonexistence. The present article argues that the field would benefit from deepening its interest in questions of erasure and relative absence. A case in point, as the article shows, is graffiti. By analysing some semiotic facets of the erasure of graffiti, the article brings home the point that a semiotics of nonexistence is deeply embedded in the semiotic regimentation of space. The persistence of this condition calls for an analytical sensitisation to less obvious forms of semiosis.
50
Konstantinov, Mihael. „ROLAND BARTHES AND YURII LOTMAN: SEARCH FOR MEANING IN FILM NARRATIVE“. Вісник КНУКіМ Серія «Мистецтвознавство», Nr. 41 (30.12.2019): 35–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.31866/2410-1176.41.2019.188528.
Annotation:
The purpose of the research is to carry out a comparative analysis of the concepts of semiotics of cinema by Roland Barthes and Yurii Lotman in the context of their understanding of the nature of film language, since understanding and methods of studying of contemporary digital audiovisual art are the topic of current interest in contemporary art history. The research methodology. The contemporary study of digital audiovisual art, as a rule, takes place within the context of interdisciplinary work, therefore, one of the methodological principles of such work is structural and semiotic approach. Today, this methodological approach to study the audiovisual art is the most developed in the semiotics of cinema, therefore the visual semiotics is viewed through the semiotics of cinema. The scientific novelty of the research. For the first time a comparative analysis of Yurii Lotman’s and Roland Barthes’s semiotics of cinema within the framework of the structural and semiotic approach was carried out. The potential of this methodological approach in the study of audiovisual art has been revealed. Conclusions. The article highlights the special aspects of understanding and application of semiotic concepts by the mentioned authors based on the cinematographic material. Thus, Roland Barthes thought that problems in a semiotic study of the cinema occur when a linguistic approach is applied, and Yurii Lotman believed such study to be completely acceptable. This resulted in a different understanding by these scientists of the nature of film language, its minimal meaningful unit, the role of syntagmatics and paradigmatics in the film narration. Different perceptions of the nature of film language and its components are an important basis for the study of contemporary digital audiovisual arts. The main difficulty of semiotics of cinema is the issue of non discrete iconic (analogue) sign in the study of cinema within the framework of the structural and semiotic approach. This problem can be solved based on the legacy of semiotics of cinema of R. Barthes and Yu. Lotman. Another important characteristic of the structural and semiotic approach is its ability to be combined with other methodological approaches in the interdisciplinary study of digital audiovisual art