Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Safety argumentation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Safety argumentation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Safety argumentation"
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca. „Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in OTC-medicine advertisements“. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6, Nr. 1 (31.03.2017): 59–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.04sno.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLodge, Martin. „Risk, Regulation and Crisis: Comparing National Responses in Food Safety Regulation“. Journal of Public Policy 31, Nr. 1 (23.02.2011): 25–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x10000218.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDe Grefte, Job. „A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation“. Informal Logic 42, Nr. 2 (10.06.2022): 389–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i2.7020.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAlden, Kieran, Paul S. Andrews, Fiona A. C. Polack, Henrique Veiga-Fernandes, Mark C. Coles und Jon Timmis. „Using argument notation to engineer biological simulations with increased confidence“. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 12, Nr. 104 (März 2015): 20141059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.1059.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRosa, Victor Mozart Tavares Leal, und Nelson Barrelo Jr. „Scientific literacy: what role does the safety air cushion in rescuing people?“ Concilium 23, Nr. 3 (02.03.2023): 40–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.53660/clm-861-23b06.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDiemert, Simon, John Goodenough, Jeff Joyce und Charles Weinstock. „Incremental Assurance Through Eliminative Argumentation“. Journal of System Safety 58, Nr. 1 (22.02.2023): 7–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.56094/jss.v58i1.215.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKauko, Tom. „On Place Safety“. Real Estate Management and Valuation 30, Nr. 1 (01.03.2022): 65–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/remav-2022-0006.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAlmpani, Sofia, Petros Stefaneas und Panayiotis Frangos. „Argumentation-Based Logic for Ethical Decision Making“. Studia Humana 11, Nr. 3-4 (01.12.2022): 46–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0015.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNesterova, V. E. „The strategy of evaluative argumentation as a means of linguistic modeling of the police image in oppositional Russian and American newspapers“. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies 8, Nr. 4 (31.12.2022): 52–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2022-4-33-52-63.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGómez, Sergio Alejandro, Anca Goron, Adrian Groza und Ioan Alfred Letia. „Assuring safety in air traffic control systems with argumentation and model checking“. Expert Systems with Applications 44 (Februar 2016): 367–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.09.027.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Safety argumentation"
Govardhan, Rao Sirisha Bai. „A Comparative Analysis of Argumentation Languages in the Context of Safety Case Development“. Thesis, Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-45349.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGómez, Rodríguez Laura. „A Tool-Supported Method for Fallacies Detection in Process-Based Argumentation“. Thesis, Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-40940.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleChelouati, Mohammed. „Contributions to safety assurance of autonomous trains“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Gustave Eiffel, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024UEFL2014.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe deployment of autonomous trains raises many questions and challenges, particularly concerning the required safety level, which must be globally at least equivalent to that of the existing systems, along with how to achieve it. Conventionally, ensuring the safety of a global railway system or a defined subsystem includes analyzing risks and effectively handling dangerous situations. Therefore, for any technical railway system, whether it is conventional, automatic, or autonomous, an acceptable level of safety must be ensured. In the context of autonomous trains, safety challenges include aspects related to the use of artificial intelligence models, the transfer of tasks and responsibilities from the driver to automatic decision-making systems, and issues related to autonomy, such as mode transitions and management of degraded modes. Thus, the safety demonstration methodology for autonomous trains must take into account the risks generated by all these aspects. In other words, it must define all the safety activities (related to the introduction of autonomy and artificial intelligence systems), complementary to conventional safety demonstration. In this context, this dissertation proposes three main contributions towards the development of a safety assurance methodology for autonomous trains. Firstly, we establish a high-level framework for structuring and presenting safety arguments for autonomous trains. This framework is based on a goal-based approach represented by the graphical modeling Goal Structuring Notation (GSN). Then, we propose a model for the situational awareness of the automated driving system of an autonomous train, that integrating the process of dynamic risk assessment. This model enables the automated driving system to perceive, understand, anticipate and adapt its behavior to unknown situations while making safe decisions. This model is illustrated through a case study related to the obstacle detection and avoidance. Finally, we develop a decision-making approach based on dynamic risk assessment. The approach is based on Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDP) and aims to ensure continuous environmental monitoring to guarantee operational safety, particularly collision prevention. The approach is based on maintaining an acceptable level of risk through continuous estimation and updating of the train's operational state and environmental perception data
Bücher zum Thema "Safety argumentation"
Brasser, Martin, Petar Bojanić und Francesco Paolo Ciglia, Hrsg. "The Star" for Beginners: Introductions to the Magnum Opus of Franz Rosenzweig. Ubiquity Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bco.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBuchteile zum Thema "Safety argumentation"
Helmle, Michael, P. Sautter, F. Hauler und F. von Zeppelin. „Safety argumentation for automated driving systems“. In Proceedings, 1437. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13255-2_105.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRobertson, David. „Can Formal Argumentation Raise our Confidence in Safe Design ?“ In Towards System Safety, 225–38. London: Springer London, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0823-8_14.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWang, Rui, Jérémie Guiochet und Gilles Motet. „A Framework for Assessing Safety Argumentation Confidence“. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3–12. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45892-2_1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMartin, H., R. Bramberger, C. Schmittner, Z. Ma, T. Gruber, A. Ruiz und G. Macher. „Safety and Security Co-engineering and Argumentation Framework“. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 286–97. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_24.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRatiu, Daniel, Marc Zeller und Lennart Killian. „Safety.Lab: Model-Based Domain Specific Tooling for Safety Argumentation“. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 72–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24249-1_7.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSljivo, Irfan, Barbara Gallina, Jan Carlson, Hans Hansson und Stefano Puri. „Tool-Supported Safety-Relevant Component Reuse: From Specification to Argumentation“. In Reliable Software Technologies – Ada-Europe 2018, 19–33. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92432-8_2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSchwalbe, Gesina, Bernhard Knie, Timo Sämann, Timo Dobberphul, Lydia Gauerhof, Shervin Raafatnia und Vittorio Rocco. „Structuring the Safety Argumentation for Deep Neural Network Based Perception in Automotive Applications“. In Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2020 Workshops, 383–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55583-2_29.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBrunel, Julien, und Jacques Cazin. „Formal Verification of a Safety Argumentation and Application to a Complex UAV System“. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 307–18. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33675-1_27.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCieslik, Ilona, Víctor J. Expósito Jiménez, Helmut Martin, Heiko Scharke und Hannes Schneider. „State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System“. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 178–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14862-0_14.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMock, Michael, Stephan Scholz, Frédérik Blank, Fabian Hüger, Andreas Rohatschek, Loren Schwarz und Thomas Stauner. „An Integrated Approach to a Safety Argumentation for AI-Based Perception Functions in Automated Driving“. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 265–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83906-2_21.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKonferenzberichte zum Thema "Safety argumentation"
Liu, C., X. Sha, F. Yan und T. Tang. „A scenario-based safety argumentation for CBTC safety case architecture“. In COMPRAIL 2010. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/cr100761.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnable, Nicholas. „Deriving Safety Assurance Case Argumentation from WF+ Models“. In 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/models-c59198.2023.00046.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDiemert, Simon, und Jeff Joyce. „Eliminative Argumentation for Arguing System Safety - A Practitioner’s Experience“. In 2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/syscon47679.2020.9275852.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGao, Xueli, und Peter Karpati. „Application of the Structured Safety Argumentation Approach Guidance on the Halden Safety Fan“. In 32nd European Safety and Reliability Conference. Singapore: Research Publishing Services, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-5183-4_r18-05-159-cd.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGao, Xueli, und Peter Karpati. „Application of the Structured Safety Argumentation Approach Guidance on the Halden Safety Fan“. In 32nd European Safety and Reliability Conference. Singapore: Research Publishing Services, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-5183-4_r18-05-159.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGao, Xueli, Peter Karpati, Bjørn Axel Gran und Alan Wassyng. „Safety Argumentation for a Nuclear Reactor Protection System -- an Assessor's View“. In 33rd European Safety and Reliability Conference. Singapore: Research Publishing Services, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-8071-1_p393-cd.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCasas-Quiroga, Lucia, und Beatriz Crujeiras-Pérez. „SECONDARY STUDENTS’ CONCEPTIONS ABOUT FOOD SAFETY IN AN ARGUMENTATION CONTEXT“. In 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.0790.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHauge, André Alexandersen, Terje Sivertsen und Bjørn Axel Gran. „Evaluating Approaches Supporting Safety Argumentation for Inclusion in a Safety Assessment Framework for Efficient Transport“. In Proceedings of the 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL). Singapore: Research Publishing Services, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3850/978-981-11-2724-3_0734-cd.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOsawa, Hideaki, Kazumasa Hioki, Hiroyuki Umeki, Hiroyasu Takase und Ian McKinley. „Use of the Safety Case to Focus KMS Applications“. In ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2009-16348.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDick, A. J. J. „Evidence-based development - coupling structured argumentation with requirements development“. In 7th IET International Conference on System Safety, incorporating the Cyber Security Conference 2012. Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cp.2012.1498.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle