Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Règlement (UE) no 1215“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Règlement (UE) no 1215" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Règlement (UE) no 1215"
Kastanidis, Athanasios T. „La litispendance internationale au regard du règlement (UE) 1215/2012“. Revue critique de droit international privé N° 3, Nr. 3 (01.07.2015): 579–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rcdip.153.0579.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBenoistel, Amélie. „Le domaine des fors protecteurs en matière d’assurances en cas d’action de la personne lésée contre l’assureur et contre l’assuré“. Revue critique de droit international privé N° 4, Nr. 4 (25.10.2023): 798–807. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rcdip.224.0798.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleUsunier, Laurence. „Compétence internationale des juridictions françaises en matière d’action en contrefaçon d’un brevet européen“. Revue critique de droit international privé N° 2, Nr. 2 (31.10.2023): 395–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rcdip.232.0395.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMarongiu Buonaiuti, Fabrizio. „La disciplina della giurisdizione nel Regolamento (UE) n. 2016/679 concernente il trattamento dei dati personali e il suo coordinamento con la disciplina contenuta nel regolamento “Bruxelles i-bis” = Jurisdiction under Regulation (EU) no. 2016/679 concerning the processing of personal data and its coordination with the “Brussels i-bis” regulation“. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 9, Nr. 2 (05.10.2017): 448. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2017.3881.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHess, Burkhard. „La reforma del Reglamento Bruselas I bis. Posibilidades y perspectivas“. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 14, Nr. 1 (02.03.2022): 10–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.6674.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLangelaan Osset, Franciso de Borja. „Estudio jurisprudencial sobre el régimen jurídico-procesal de las cláusulas de jurisdicción insertas en conocimientos de embarque: situación actual y futuro proyectado = Jurisprudencial examination on the legal and procedural regime of jurisdiction clauses inserted in bills of lading: current situation and foreseeable future“. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 11, Nr. 1 (11.03.2019): 408. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4626.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRomero Matute, Yeray. „Análisis del AAP Valencia nº 276/2019 de 11 de octubre: cláusula de competencia judicial internacional incluida en el régimen de conocimiento de embarque: subrogación de una de las partes“. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 12, Nr. 2 (08.10.2020): 1146. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5663.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGallant, Estelle. „Qu’est-ce que la loi du for au sens du règlement Rome III ?“ Revue critique de droit international privé N° 4, Nr. 4 (25.10.2023): 758–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rcdip.224.0758.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGolak, Mateusz Wiktor. „Jurysdykcja w sprawach roszczeń o naprawienie szkody wyrządzonej wykonaniem zabezpieczenia w rozporządzeniu (UE) nr 1215/2012“. Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza 6 (15.12.2016): 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2016.6.22.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRauscher, Thomas. „Le nouveau règlement Bruxelles I bis. Règlement n° 1215/2012 du 12 décembre 2012 concernant la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l'exécution des décisions en matière civile et commercial. So“. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 80, Nr. 1 (2016): 180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/003372516x14497453829845.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Règlement (UE) no 1215"
Tramarin, Sara. „La tutela giudiziale e stragiudiziale del consumatore nel diritto dell’Unione europea“. Thesis, Strasbourg, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017STRAA007/document.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe thesis analyzes, under various aspects related to private international law and international civil procedure of the European Union, the status of the protection offered to the European consumers in their international contracts, in particular in relation to the objectives and in the context of the single market. The thesis is divided into three chapters. The first chapter deals with consumer protection in the international private law of European Union (regulation (UE) 1215/2012 and regulation (CE) 593/2008). The second chapter deals with the protection offered to consumers by european international civil procedure with reference to individual and collective litigations. The third chapter deals with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and with on-line dispute resolution (ODR) and analyzes EU directive 2013/11/UE and regulation (EU) 524/2013
La tesi analizza, sotto vari aspetti relativi al diritto internazionale privato e processuale dell’Unione Europea, lo stato della protezione offerta al consumatore europeo nei contratti e nelle controversie internazionali, con uno specifico riguardo alle tutele di carattere processuale e giurisdizionale. La tesi si articola in tre capitoli, che investono gli ambiti in cui tale tutela può esplicarsi, ovvero, l’individuazione di un foro e di una legge applicabile favorevoli agli interessi del consumatore, la semplificazione delle regole di procedura nelle controversie individuali internazionali, la possibilità di dare luogo a procedimenti transfrontalieri collettivi e la creazione di un sistema efficace di risoluzione delle controversie internazionali in via stragiudiziale anche on-line. Il primo capitolo ricostruisce dapprima il sistema di diritto internazionale privatodell'Unione europea in materia di contratti di consumo, dando conto del contesto politico ed economico in cui si inserisce ed alla cui luce devono esserne letti gli obiettivi. Vengono quindi individuati i principi e gli obiettivi che fondano le norme di diritto internazionale privato in materia di contratti internazionali del consumatore, le quali si caratterizzano per l’essere ispirate a finalità materiali, ovvero, volte a permettere di individuare un foro competente ed una legge applicabile che siano in grado di bilanciare tra loro le esigenze dei consumatori e degli operatori del mercato, con la conseguenza di favorire l’esplicarsi degli scambi commerciali e della concorrenza nel mercato unico. Ciò avviene garantendo al consumatore l’applicazione della legge e la competenza del foro a lui più prossimi, ovvero quelli del suo paese di residenza abituale (la cui coincidenza permette peraltro una riduzione dei costi delle liti transfrontaliere) e la prevedibilità delle soluzioni agli operatori del mercato.Il capitolo traccia quindi lo sviluppo normativo e giurisprudenziale delle norme di diritto internazionale privato europee in materia di contratti del consumatore, prendendo in particolare in considerazione le più recenti sentenze della Corte di Giustizia che, dal 2010 ad oggi, hanno ridefinito l’ambito di applicazione delle norme contenute nel regolamento (CE) 44/2001 (Bruxelles I), oggi rifuso nel regolamento (UE) 1215/2012 (Bruxelles I-bis), e nel regolamento (CE) 593/2008 (Roma I), insistendo sulla definizione del concetto, volutamente aleatorio, di “attività diretta” e sul suo ruolo di preminenza nel connettere la fattispecie contrattuale allo Stato della residenza del consumatore per permetterne la competenza dei giudici e l’applicabilità della relativa legge. Viene svolta infine una analisi critica sull’interpretazione fornita dalla Corte di Giustizia che rischia, nel concreto, di rendere le norme in oggetto applicabili in maniera variabile dai giudici nazionali, garantendo alle volte una tutela troppo estesa o troppo ristretta al consumatore, senza riguardo per l’esigenza di certezza giuridica degli operatori del mercato
Davila, Valdiviezo Charlotte. „Les stratégies contentieuses en matière civile et commerciale : étude à partir du Règlement Bruxelles I bis“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Lyon 3, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023LYO30032.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWhile the term "strategy" is rarely associated with the legal field, strategies aimed at leveraging the law to one's advantage have always existed. To shed light on this phenomenon, this thesis focuses specifically on litigation strategies that revolve around a trial as a central point.The starting assumption was the paramount importance of understanding the rules and the framework to effectively navigate towards an advantageous outcome. Rules here are broadly defined to include the legal rules of the member states and the Union, the case law of their courts, and the entire economic, political, social, and cultural context surrounding the parties and their dispute.Strategic litigation practice in the European area then warranted a detailed review of the various actors involved in the strategy (parties, national judges, European judges), as well as the history and evolution of the European Union and its law.This quest for knowledge of the rules also led us to revisit the conceptual framework and concrete achievements concerning jurisdiction in the European Union, highlighting a complex system revolving around the Brussels 1bis Regulation and a Court of Justice of the Union, both an actor and promoter of European integration.However, the development of strategies does not stop at understanding the rules but requires their anticipation and adaptation to changing realities. The choice of court then becomes a strategic maneuver, guided by both objective and subjective criteria.Reviewing European history as well as the trajectory of the strategic actors provides an opportunity to grasp their operating modes and to anticipate their actions within the context of a multicultural Europe, composed of sovereign member states. It will be about predicting legal developments, jurisprudential reversals, advantageous positions, or even actions that are likely to meet the economic or political objectives of the Union, while keeping in mind that judges can always introduce bias into the judgment process. It will also involve understanding the adversary's history in order to estimate their strengths and weaknesses to adjust the strategy accordingly.However, there is no single path to the success of a litigation strategy: the success of a strategy largely depends on the perception of the litigant, their objectives and expectations. The choice of jurisdiction can then be made based on the procedural guarantees offered, the predictability of the decision, or the application of specific rules attached to the forum.The litigation strategy can also involve breaking away from this scheme to seek an alternative resolution through amicable methods or arbitration.While the strategic approach may be tempted to free itself from ethical or moral constraints by using maneuvers that pervert the purpose of the texts, it is essential to remember that a strategy can be both profitable and virtuous. Failing this, national and European judges will play their role as safeguards of the system's integrity
GIUGLIANO, VALERIA. „LE 'OPPOSIZIONI' ALL'ESECUZIONE DELLA DECISIONE STRANIERA NEL REGOLAMENTO (UE) 1215/2012“. Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/610592.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDebernardi, Giovanna. „Le règlement européen sur les successions et nouvelles perspectives pour les systèmes juridiques nationaux“. Thesis, Université Côte d'Azur (ComUE), 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017AZUR0008/document.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRegulation (EU) n° 650/2012 of 4 July 2012 led to a considerable revolution in the field of international successions. Indeed, such a subject has always caused several divergences among national legal systems, especially at the European level where the need for a proper functioning of the free movement of persons have led to an essential common reform of private international succession law. As a results, rules governing cross-border successions have been globally harmonised and citizens are finally able to organise their succession in advance. Nonetheless, Regulation n° 650/212 should not be limited to the only harmonisation of conflicts-of-laws rules ; these latter are certainly its primary objective, but not the only one. Indeed, the new instrument should aim at a more ambitious goal : the convergence of national legal systems. In order to achieve such a purpose, the European legislator has provided for two different means : on one side a typical and essential instrument of private international law like the public policy ; on the other side a new and unique instrument of substantial law such as the European certificate of succession. As a consequence, the new Regulation should not leed to a sample unification in the field of the private international law, but would also contribute to a progressive uniformisation of national rules of Member States. It could thus represent a remarkable achievement in the historical European project for the maintenance and development of an area of freedom, security and justice inside the Union
Lunetti, Chiara. „Actions deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them under regulation EU 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings“. Thesis, Paris 1, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA01D011.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe thesis, entitled "Actions deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them under regulation EU 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings", focuses on the criteria for determining the courts having jurisdiction for disputes arising in the context of cross-border Insolvency proceedings. According to its Article l(l)(b), insolvency proceedings are excluded from the scope of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 ('Brussels Regulation') and should be covered by Regulation (EU) No 848/2015 ('EIR). For this reason, in principle, the interpretation of the two regulations should, as far as possible, fill in the regulatory gaps between the two instruments. The text of the new Article 6 EIR now provides that any action with cross-border elements that prove to be 'directly deriving from Insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them' must be attracted to the jurisdiction of the Member State opening the insolvency procedure under Article 3 EIR. Nevertheless, this principle (referred to as the 'reduced' vis attractiva concursus), despite some clarifications provided by the European Court of Justice, does not resolve the issue, and the interpretation of the scope of application of the Insolvency Regulation and the Brussels Regulation's remains questionable, as there are still many grey zones in the interpretation of this rule. The aim of the thesis is to analyse what kind of actions should be regarded as 'directly deriving from' and 'closely linked with' insolvency proceedings, and to analyse those cases where it is controversial whether the action should fall within the scope of the EIR rather than the Brussels Regulation
LUNETTI, CHIARA TERESA MARIA. „ACTIONS DERIVING DIRECTLY FROM INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS AND CLOSELY LINKED WITH THEM UNDER REGULATION EU 848/2015 ON INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS“. Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/710018.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHistorically, the topic of individual actions directly deriving from and closely linked with insolvency proceedings (hereinafter referred to as “Annex Actions”) has been addressed in the European scenario with reference to the scope ratione materiae of the Brussels Convention dated 1968 on the jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the “Brussels Convention”). In the absence (at that time) of Community rules on cross-border insolvencies, in the Gourdain judgment the ECJ interpreted the notion of Annex Actions under the prism of the exception relating to “bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings”, set forth by Article 1(2)(2) Brussels Convention. It was on that occasion that the Court held that actions which are related to insolvency proceedings are excluded from the scope of the Brussels Convention (now the Brussels 1a Regulation), with the proviso that they derive directly from insolvency proceedings and are closely linked with them (thus coining what has been called, over the years, the “Gourdain Formula”). The interpretative uncertainties arising from such an ambiguous wording - at the time referring only to the scope of application of the Brussels Convention - were not removed (and possibly were even exacerbated) by the introduction of the European regime on insolvency proceedings. Indeed, the Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 (the “Insolvency Regulation”), on the one hand, revealed a serious regulatory gap, since it did not provide for a rule on the jurisdiction of Annex Actions and, on the other hand, even where it mentioned them (for purposes other than jurisdiction), it laconically restated the Gourdain Formula, with no further clarifications. The nebulous legislative framework described above has been partly clarified by Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (the “Recast Regulation”), which has remedied the aforementioned omission, expressly providing for the (halved) European vis attractiva concursus. According to that principle, the courts of the Member State in the territory of which insolvency proceedings are opened, are vested with the jurisdiction to hear and determine Annex Actions. The impact of the reform over the “dynamic” profile of the vis attractiva concursus must be positively assessed since it has dispelled many of the doubts concerning the allocation of jurisdiction on Annex Actions. Yet, the problem of the autonomous definition of Annex Actions remains partially unsolved, because also under the Recast Regulation, the contours of that concept continue to be defined by the vague Gourdain Formula. Only partial indications can be drawn from Recital 35 Recast Regulation and, above all, from the extensive case-law of the ECJ. The latter, however, allows only to some extent to draw a systematic notion of Annex Actions, as it substantially reveals a wavering orientation, which does not permit to trace (yet) a general criterion, certain and shared on this point. It is suggested that, for the purposes of the European legislation, Annex Actions are those actions underpinning a right or obligation which stems from the opening of insolvency proceedings, whose DNA, we might say, is ontologically linked to insolvency proceedings. They would count a very small number of actions such as (predictably) avoidance actions, liability actions against the trustee and other bodies of the procedure, and actions arising from the termination of contracts exercised by the trustee by virtue of the express powers conferred upon him by insolvency law. On the contrary, all other actions in respect of which the procedure is a neutral (legal) event should not be characterised as Annex Actions (e.g. actions that have only an occasional link with insolvency proceedings and those that existed in the legal sphere of the insolvent debtor prior to the opening of the procedure). However, considerable doubts remain with respect to the characterisation of some actions, which can be placed in an uncertain twilight-zone at the crossline between civil, commercial law and bankruptcy law. Although the legal foundation of those action exists even before insolvency proceedings, they prove to be affected by the opening of the procedure to such an extent that they may be considered as different actions. In the wake of these preliminary observations, the thesis aims to specifically analyse the topic of Annex Actions under the European regime of cross-border insolvencies. Not only it investigates the procedural aspects of the issue (in particular, the jurisdiction), but it also assesses whether it is possible to draw an autonomous notion of Annex Action and elaborate a catalogue of actions, which, despite the differences inherent in each national system, reveal a jus commune europaeum that allows to trace them back under the umbrella of the Recast Regulation.
La thèse intitulé « les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et qui y sont étroitement liées dans le cadre du Règlement UE 2015/848 sur les procédures d'insolvabilité » se concentre sur les critères de détermination des juridictions compétentes en matière de litiges découlant de la procédure d’insolvabilité dans le contexte de procédures transfrontalières. Selon son Article 1(1)(b), les procédures d’insolvabilité sont exclues du Règlement (UE) n° 1215/2012 concernant la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale (« Règlement Bruxelles ») et devraient relever du champ d’application du Règlement (UE) n° 848/2015 relatif aux procédures d’insolvabilité (« Règlement Refondu »). Pour cette raison, en principe, l’interprétation de deux susmentionnés Règlements devrait, autant que possible, combler les lacunes entre les deux instruments. Le texte du nouvel article 6 du Règlement Refondu prévoit désormais que les juridictions compétentes en vertu de son article 3 soient compétentes également pour toutes les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et y sont étroitement liées. Toutefois, ce principe (appelé la vis attractiva concursus européenne), malgré quelques clarifications ont été fournies par la Cour de Justice, ne résoudre pas la question et l’interprétation du champ d’application du Règlement Refondu par rapport au Règlement Bruxelles est encore douteuse, car il y a encore beaucoup de zones grises dans l’interprétation de cette règle. L'objectif de la thèse est d'analyser quel type d'actions doit être considéré comme « découlant directement » et « étroitement lié » aux procédures d'insolvabilité, et d'analyser les cas où il est controversé de savoir si l'action doit entrer dans le champ d'application du Règlement Refondu plutôt que dans celui du Règlement Bruxelles.
Laroche, Benjamin. „Le big data à l’épreuve du règlement européen général sur la protection des données“. Thesis, Toulouse 1, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOU10041.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCitizens’ daily uses of technologies in a digital society exponentially produce data. In this context, the development of massive data collection appears as inevitable. Such technologies involve the processing of personal data in order to create economic value or to optimize business or decision-making processes. The General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) aims to regulate these practices while respecting the imperatives of flexibility and technological neutrality. However, big data is proving to be an unprecedentedly complex legal issue, as its specific characteristics oppose several principles of the General Data Protection Regulation. Widely shared, this observation has gradually imposed an implicit form of status quo that does not allow for the effective resolution of the incompatibility between the reality of big data and the legal framework provided by the GDPR. In order to solve this equation, a distributive approach, based on the components of the big data: its structure, its data and its algorithmic capabilities, will then make it possible to study the qualification of this notion in order to identify an appropriate regime. Overcoming such a problem will, first of all, involve updating the qualification of personal data in order to respond to the increasing complexity of data processing carried out using advanced algorithmic capabilities. In addition, the accountability of the various actors involved, in particular through joint responsibilities for processing, will be associated with the notion of risk in order to bring the necessary updating to the regulation of big data. Finally, the application of a data protection impact analysis methodology will test and then synthesize the indispensable strengthening of the adequacy between legal theory and the practical reality of big data
Mouzaki, Dionysia. „La médiation des différends civils en droit de l'Union Européenne et ses incidences sur les droits français, anglais et grec“. Thesis, Lyon, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018LYSE3021.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWith regard to the Directive n° 52/2008CE of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 May 2008 in certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters, as well as the Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC also the Regulation (EU) n°524/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR), this thesis examine the main lines for the development of mediation set out by the European Union. How the tendency to develop mediation within Europe, represented by the directive the European texts above has been reflected in the three legal systems examined? How mediation works in systems where law is rigid and its infringement is being severely sanctioned (civil law applied in France and Greece) and how does it work in common law (applied in the United Kingdom)? Mediation law is nowadays largely presented as a flexible way to avoid court’s costs, longevity and complexity. But should it be integrated in procedural law as a kind of complementary justice within the courts? Can positive law, courts and amiable dispute resolution cooperate in an effective manner? An effective cooperation of public justice and mediation could be of major importance for the improvement of procedural law, as access to justice is not always guaranteed. Public justice has not always being successful, since the severe application of law has been proven unable to create a social and dynamic legal system. Thus, it often cultivates “bitterness” against judicial adventure. In this regard, mediation promises a profound change in the way of settling disputes. However, the idea of a “private” justice based in contract law does not go without mistrusts. The imbalance between the parties is usually obvious in contract law and fosters the strongest party. The question then is to know if a secure legal framework of mediation based on the particularities of national legal systems could facilitate its proper implementation. The main concept of the thesis is to present a legal structure of mediation combined by the European law’s directives and their implementation in the three national laws. But the nature, the process, as well as the relation of mediation with courts are examined in parallel with the conformity of mediation in the article 6 § 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights, the fundamental right of a public hearing by a tribunal
Koumpli, Christina. „Les données personnelles sensibles : contribution à l'évolution du droit fondamental à la protection des données personnelles : étude comparée : Union Européenne, Allemagne, France, Grèce, Royaume-Uni“. Thesis, Paris 1, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PA01D003.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBefore the GDPR, protection of sensitive personal data consisted of a prior check by an independent authority despite limiting their free movement. This has been replaced by the obligation of the controller to prepare a privacy impact assessment. With this modification, one can assume a risk of pre-legitimization of data processing, putting the controller at an advantage. Is that compatible with the fundamental right to the protectionof personal data ? This thesis questions the content of this right and the validity of the GDPR. It is based on a comparative study from 1970s until present day between four European countries and the European Union, in which sensitive data are chosen as a meanto the analysis due to their particular protection. Research shows that in legal termsthe preventive conception is a part of the history of protection in the European Union. By limiting freedom of processing it gives meaning to protection and its only subject,the individual. Such an interpretation is compatible with National Constitutions despite their variations. However, the preventive conception of data protection is not so easily compatible with article 8 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. The thesis puts forward that this article contains the safeguard of a balancing, between EU liberties and individuals’ freedoms, which implicates reduced protection. It is up to the European Court of Justice to identify the essence of this right, an aim to which this thesis could contribute
Kudła, Jacek. „Jurysdykcja krajowa w sprawach dotyczących ubezpieczeń według rozporządzenia Parlementu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 1215/2012“. Doctoral thesis, 2018.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenThe subject matter of the dissertation is the jurisdiction in insurance matters under Regulation No 1215/2012. The dissertation pursues five research objectives: I) Identification of standards governing jurisdiction in insurance matters and establishment of an order of their implementation; II) Determination of the scope of subject-territorial and objective application of Section 3 of Chapter II of Regulation No 1215/2012; III) Presentation of the individual grounds for jurisdiction in insurance matters and determination of the nature of the entire special regime of jurisdictional standards in these matters; IV) Examination of the functioning of the protection mechanisms for the weaker party of an insurance case, with the protection consisting essentially of five elements: 1. the asymmetry in jurisdiction regulations, manifesting itself in favouring the weaker party – the policyholder, the insured and the beneficiary of insurance, as well as the victim – in the form of opportunities to take advantage of the alternately established grounds of jurisdiction, with the absence of such a law for the stronger party – the insurer; 2. the restriction of the freedom of the parties in concluding agreements on jurisdiction; 3. asymmetric reinforcement of the effectiveness of the agreements on jurisdiction in the event of a positive conflict of competence between courts in different Member States; 4. the duty to caution the weaker party of the right to challenge the jurisdiction of the court and of the consequences of entering into a dispute; 5. the maintenance of the possibility to control the jurisdiction of the intermediate state of the recognition or enforcement of a decision; V) Determination whether it is appropriate to have separate jurisdiction regulations for insurance cases. The dissertation consists of 7 chapters, an introduction and notes. The first chapter provides substantive issues pertaining to the insurance contract and the construction of the insurance relationship, referred to in regulation of the jurisdiction in the Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, using the terminology in the field of material insurance law. The second chapter outlines the history of the European jurisdiction regulations in matters of insurance, identifies sources of standards, including the Polish regulations, indicates the hierarchy of their application, and specifies relationships between them. Further examined are the general requirements of Regulation No 1215/2012 – the place of residence in a Member State and the existence of a foreign element. The third chapter analyses the subject-territorial and substantive scope of application of the standards of jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance, including clarification of the "weaker party", its successors, and the autonomous interpretation of the term "insurance case". The core of the dissertation consists of a presentation in the fourth chapter of the grounds of jurisdiction in matters of insurance available to the weaker party and the insurer. A view of this issue from two perspectives enables highlighting the imbalance in the regulation providing in principle for 7 grounds of jurisdiction for the weaker party and 1 for the insurer, not counting the jurisdiction resulting from mutual action and contractual jurisdiction. Particular attention is given to issues of emergency action against the insurer, grounds for jurisdiction for the victim’s actio directa, and the policyholder and the insured being joined as a party to an action before a forum having jurisdiction for the direct action brought by the victim. Chapters 5-7 refer to admitting in insurance matters: the agreement conferring jurisdiction and its impact on third parties, especially legal successors; the court’s adoption of jurisdiction based on the entrance into a dispute and instruction to the weaker party of the consequences thereof; and recognition and enforcement of judgments, in particular in the context of maintaining control of intermediate jurisdiction in the requested Member State, respectively.
Bücher zum Thema "Règlement (UE) no 1215"
Guinchard, Emmanuel. Le nouveau règlement Bruxelles I bis: Règlement n° 1215/2012 du 12 décembre 2012 concernant la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l'exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale. Bruxelles: Emile Bruylant, 2014.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "Règlement (UE) no 1215"
Peyen, Loïc. „L’Union européenne et la protection des communautés autochtones : le bilan en demi-teinte du règlement (UE) no 511/2014 relatif au protocole de Nagoya sur l’accès aux ressources génétiques et le partage juste et équitable des avantages découlant de leur utilisation“. In Peuples autochtones et intégrations régionales, 281–303. Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/pur.herve.2020.01.0281.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle