Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Public participation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Public participation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Public participation"
Nielsen, Annika Porsborg, Jesper Lassen und Peter Sandøe. „Public participation“. Public Understanding of Science 20, Nr. 2 (24.09.2009): 163–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662509336713.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTennille, Cheryl L. „Public Participation“. Public Works Management & Policy 9, Nr. 4 (April 2005): 263–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087724x05276614.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBarnes, Marian. „Researching public participation“. Local Government Studies 25, Nr. 4 (Dezember 1999): 60–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003939908433967.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMeier, Andreas. „Rezension „Public Participation““. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 54, Nr. 4 (22.05.2017): 632–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1365/s40702-017-0329-y.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRichardson, Tim, Jiri Dusik und Pavla Jindrova. „Parallel public participation“. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18, Nr. 3 (Mai 1998): 201–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0195-9255(98)00007-9.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleEckerd, Adam, und Roy L. Heidelberg. „Administering Public Participation“. American Review of Public Administration 50, Nr. 2 (27.08.2019): 133–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleEmmanouilidou, Pantelina. „Participation du public“. Revue Juridique de l'Environnement 39, Nr. 3 (2014): 586–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rjenv.2014.6336.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMuhammad, Zikri, Tarmiji Masron und Aziz Abdul Majid. „Local Government Service Efficiency: Public Participation Matters“. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 5, Nr. 10 (2015): 827–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2015.v5.565.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDamkuviene, Milda, und Evandzelina Petukiene. „Co-Creation of Public Services; Levels of Customers’ Participation“. Advanced Journal of Social Science 2, Nr. 1 (15.04.2018): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.21467/ajss.2.1.40-47.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleXing, Yan, Jing Wen Liu, Bing Xin Li, Ming Zhang und De Guang Meng. „Research on Public Participation in Urban Planning“. Advanced Materials Research 255-260 (Mai 2011): 1333–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.255-260.1333.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Public participation"
Mentoor, John W. „Public participation in public policy making“. Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/855.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study assesses public participation in public policy making by way of a case study approach. The Regional Education Boards and the Regional Services Council form part of the case study evaluation of public participation in public policy making. In essence, a structural-functionalist analysis of the two cases is given. From this approach this study points out what the activities of the two institutions are, what services they render and the policy measures with which they are engaged in. This is imperative because by way of an analysis, the extent to which the public is allowed to participate in the policy making process, with reference to the two institutions, is determined. Before the assessment of the two cases a conceptual framework pertaining to public participation in public policy making is given. In this conceptual framework the different typologies, policy levels, participants and the modes of public participation in public policy making are highlighted. In earlier years public participation in public policy making was simply seen as being confined to voting turn-out. As the study of public policy making expanded the operational definition of public participation was broaden to include activities such as campaigning, handing petitions to members of parliament, attending political meetings, writing letters to communication media, written representations submitted to a minister and protest action. Thus, as the study of public policy making expanded it became clear that separate participation modes exist because the activities which emanates from the implementation of public policy differ systematically in the requirements it place on the citizens. What is significant of this thesis is that it proposed a nine-point criteriological model for effective participation in public policy making. Each criterium is analyzed in depth and it is indicated how important it is for effective public participation in public policy making.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie bepaal publieke deelname in openbare beleidmaking by wyse van 'n setwerklike benadering. Die Onderwysstreekrade en die Streekdiensterade vorm deel van hierdie evaluering van publieke deelname in openbare beleidmaking. Vir hierdie benadering word 'n strukturieel - funksionele uiteensetting van die werkswyse en beleidsmaatreëls van die twee instansies gegee. Hierdie uiteensetting is belangrik omrede, deur middel van 'n analise, daar bepaal word tot watter mate die publiek deel uitmaak van die beleidmakingsproses ten opsigte van die twee instansies. Voor die uiteensetting van die setwerklike benadering word 'n raamwerk met betrekking tot die konsepte wat van toepassing is op publieke deelname in openbare beleidmaking, gegee. In hierdie raamwerk word die verskillende tipologieë, beleidsvlakke, deelnemers en die verskillende maniere van publieke deelname in die openbare beleidmakingsproses, uitgebeeld. In vroeër jare was publieke deelname in openbare beleid gesien as bloot deelname aan verkiesings. Namate die studie van openbare beleid uitgebrei het, het die operasionele definisie van publieke deelname groter geword om aktiwiteite soos petisies aan parlementslede, bywoning van politieke vergaderings, briewe aan kommunikasiemedia, geskrewe voorleggings aan ministers en protesaksies in te sluit. Dit het derhalwe duidelik geword dat daar verskillende maniere is betreffende publieke deelname omrede die aktiwiteite wat vloei uit die implementering van openbare beleid in verskillende gemeenskappe, verskillend is. Wat die studie merkwaardig maak is dat dit 'n nege-punt kriteriologiese model vir effektiewe publieke deelname in die openbare beleidmakingsproses voorstel. Elke kriteria word in diepte geanaliseer en dit word uitgewys hoe belangrik dit vir effektiewe publieke deelname in die openbare beleidmakingsproses is.
Du, Guiying. „Supporting Public Participation through Interactive Immersive Public Displays“. Doctoral thesis, Universitat Jaume I, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/14123.2018.783145.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLas principales contribuciones de esta tesis se pueden resumir en: (1) la identificación de desafíos y oportunidades clave para futuras investigaciones en el uso de exhibiciones públicas para la participación pública en contextos urbanos; (2) también se identifican dos conjuntos de gestos definidos por el usuario para dos conjuntos de gestos telefónicos definidos por el usuario y gestos con las manos para realizar once actividades de consultoría, que consisten en examinar los diseños de planificación urbana y brindar retroalimentación relacionada con las alternativas de diseño. (3) un nuevo enfoque para el uso de exhibiciones públicas para votar y comentar en la planificación urbana, y una evaluación multinivel de un sistema prototípico que implementa el enfoque propuesto. Los diseñadores e investigadores pueden utilizar las contribuciones de esta tesis para crear exhibiciones públicas interactivas para apoyar una mayor participación pública, es decir, la colaboración ciudadana y el empoderamiento.
Programa de Doctorat en Geoinformàtica
Rood, Jason Alexander. „Public Participation in Emergency Management“. PDXScholar, 2012. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/333.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCarlos, Aceros Juan. „Who counts as public in public participation? Regimes of Legitimate Participation in Techno-Scientific Controversies“. Doctoral thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/131273.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe given PhD dissertation is motivated by the interest that Science and Technology Studies have shown in public participation and its role in the 'democratisation of democracy' through the 'democratisation of science and technology'. It was developed in connection with the R+D+i Project 'Science, Technology and Citizenship in Knowledge Societies', which main goal was to sheet light to the transformation of public controversies into techno-scientific controversies, and vice versa. More specifically, the objectives of this dissertation are: (1) Increasing knowledge about the public understanding of the techno-scientific controversies, (2) Getting to know the strategies that citizens deploy to participate in the public disputes together with scientists and technologists, and (3) Increasing understanding of the players involved in the control of publicly available information on the disputes. The research question is the following: How do ordinary people and social analysts identify and accept players with the right to take the part of the public in public participation? With this research question in mind, the author propose an approach to the understanding and shaping of public participation which is mainly inspired by the Sociology of Critical Capacity, the Cosmopolitical Proposal and performative approach of Bruno Latour. Drawing on this theoretical framework a particular method that ordinary people and social analysts use in the constitution of the public of an issue is described. Such a method is called 'Regime of Legitimate Participation' (RLP), a form of practical knowledge which includes a set of dichotomous principles of participant's evaluation. The RLP is not a deductive category applied to the data. Instead, it is an emergent category developed ex post facto, as a notion with which a phenomenon grasped by three published papers – although initially not addressed enough in them – can be named. This dissertation is divided into four chapters. Chapter 1 exposes the objectives, research question and theoretical framework of the PhD dissertation. Chapter 2 includes two papers concerned with the public understanding of citizen participation in techno-scientific controversies. In the first paper (Section 2.1.) the data come from a set of eleven focus groups carried out in Catalonian during 2006. A qualitative content analysis aims to explore what 'citizenship' means when people speak about 'citizen participation'. The second paper (Section 2.2.) is based on the analysis of six of the eleven focus groups mentioned above. It introduces a pragmatic approach to the data showing that, in a given communicative context, participants in our study use space labels in order to identify those groups whose activities are regarded as relevant by the speakers when they are talking about 'water problems'. Chapter 3 introduces a paper focused on the way different organisations exploit the Web with the aim to participate in the debates about water policy in Spain and to define the topics involved. Chapter 4 discusses the most important outcomes of the Sections 2.1., 2.2. and 3.1. In this final Chapter, the structure and operation of the RLP are outlined. The answer to the research question is then openly stated, and implications of the RLP for the 'democratisation' of science and technology come to the fore. Future lines of enquiry are suggested.
Figueredo, Jorge Cesar. „Public Participation In Transportation: An Emperical Test For Authentic Participation“. Doctoral diss., University of Central Florida, 2005. http://digital.library.ucf.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ETD/id/4265.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePh.D.
Other
Health and Public Affairs
Public Affairs: Ph.D.
Brett, Raphaël. „La participation du public à l'élaboration des normes environnementales“. Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015SACLS093.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe study of Public Participation in Environmental Decision-making demonstrates that participation contributes to Modern state's mutation. International, europeans and french laws offer from now on various perspectives for the public to influence the construction of environmental decisions. If it does not change the nature of the french notion of general interest, it surely modifies the way to elaborate such interest. The study emphasizes more precisely the role of individuals and groups of interest in this new procedural democracy. It underlines furthermore the conditions in which public participation can really satisfy its two main objectives, the legitimization of public action and the improvement of the content of environmental decisions
Bond, Sophie, und n/a. „Participation, urbanism and power“. University of Otago. Department of Geography, 2008. http://adt.otago.ac.nz./public/adt-NZDU20080404.152556.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKeung, John Kam-Yin. „Public participation in planning in developing countries“. Thesis, Cardiff University, 1990. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.278529.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleYao, Basilia Wang. „Technology and public participation in environmental decisions“. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37474.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIncludes bibliographical references (p. 102-109).
Since 1970, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has served as the main instrument for analyzing the environmental impacts of federal agency decisions and providing the public with opportunities to participate in the decision making process. For over 35 years, NEPA has defined the process by which agencies assess environmental impacts and disclose those assessments to the public. During this period however, NEPA has come under increasing scrutiny due to the considerable conflict surrounding environmental policies, eroding credibility of science-based policy information, and lack of meaningful public participation opportunities in practice. Experience has shown that collaborative decision making reduces conflict among participants, increases the credibility of science-based information underlying environmental decisions and improves the overall legitimacy of the participation process. The federal government has embraced web-based technology as a means of improving upon the traditional NEPA public participation process. Electronic participation has generated considerable interest among policymakers and scholars due to its potential to facilitate more efficient and more deliberative interaction between citizens and government.
(cont.) This paper analyzes a pilot program by the Bureau of Land Management to integrate electronic participation into its decision making process. I evaluate four cases involved in the ePlanning pilot to understand the extent to which recent electronic participation efforts build upon established best practices in traditional, or offline participation. While there are some encouraging signs, most cases indicate that technology is applied mostly as a means of digitizing existing steps in the decision making process, rather than as a tool for enhancing the communicative and deliberative aspects of participation. The democratic potential of web-based technology lies not in the automation of existing practice, but in the support of established best practices.
by Basilia Want Yao.
M.C.P.
Durose, E. Joan. „Public involvement in public sector organisations : why do we find it so difficult?“ Thesis, Keele University, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.288497.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBücher zum Thema "Public participation"
Washington (State). Dept. of Ecology., Hrsg. Public participation grants. [Olympia, Wash.]: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 2000.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenCommission, California Public Utilities. Guide for public participation. [San Francisco]: California Public Utilities Commission, 2001.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenMassachusetts. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Board. Draft public participation plan. Boston, Mass: The Board, 1991.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenStephens, John B. Public outreach and participation. [Chapel Hill, N.C.]: UNC School of Government, 2011.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenHo, Seok Geck. Public participation in EIA. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, 2000.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBrian, Martin, Hrsg. Technology and public participation. New South Wales, Australia: Science and Technology Studies, University of Wollongong, 1999.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenJane, Morris, und Local Government Management Board, Hrsg. Innovations in public participation. London: Local Government Management Board., 1996.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenKumar, Prashant. Financing of public enterprises and public participation. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publications, 1990.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenParenteau, René. Public participation in environmental decision-making =: La participation du public aux décisions d'aménagement. Hull, Qué: Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office = Bureau fédéral d'examen des évaluations environnementales, 1988.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenHeadley, James, Andreas Reitzig und Joe Burton, Hrsg. Public Participation in Foreign Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230367180.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBuchteile zum Thema "Public participation"
Lee, Tsuey-Ping, und Tung-Wen Milan Sun. „Public Participation“. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 5171–81. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_2720.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOmenn, Gilbert S., Caroline Allen, John Dohrmann, Tim Douglas, Susan Hall und Gordon Orians. „Public Participation“. In Environmental Biotechnology, 405–17. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0824-7_28.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLee, Tsuey-Ping, und Tung-Wen Milan Sun. „Public Participation“. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–12. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2720-1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBoswell, Michael R., Adrienne I. Greve und Tammy L. Seale. „Public Participation“. In Local Climate Action Planning, 65–86. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-201-3_3.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRawat, Pragati, und John C. Morris. „Public Participation“. In The Effects of Technology and Institutions on E-Participation, 15–29. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003164326-2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMatemilola, Saheed, und Timothy Sijuade. „Public Participation“. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_515-1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLaverack, Glenn. „Participation“. In A–Z of Public Health, 135–37. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-42617-8_51.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLewanski, Rodolfo, und Stefania Ravazzi. „Innovating Public Participation“. In The Professionalization of Public Participation, 17–39. New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315637983-2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLandström, Catharina. „Public Participation in Environmental Science“. In Environmental Participation, 23–43. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33043-9_2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLandström, Catharina. „Public Participation That Reconfigures Expertise“. In Environmental Participation, 67–87. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33043-9_4.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKonferenzberichte zum Thema "Public participation"
Thiel, Sarah-Kristin. „Gamers in public participation“. In MUM '16: 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012723.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDu, Guiying, Auriol Degbelo und Christian Kray. „Public displays for public participation in urban settings“. In PerDis '17: 6th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078825.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleVan Negen, P. „Final Disposal Through Public Participation“. In ASME 2001 8th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2001-1206.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDavies, Jonathan, und Rob Procter. „Online platforms of public participation“. In ICEGOV 2020: 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428614.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleYuan, Fang. „Discussion About Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in China’s Nuclear Power Plant Project“. In 2017 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone25-67828.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDezhi, Yang. „On public participation in local budget“. In Fifth International Conference on Public Management : International Collaboration for Innovated Public Governance (ICPM 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icpm-18.2018.25.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLinghua, Li. „On Citizen Participation in Public Policy“. In Fifth International Conference on Public Management : International Collaboration for Innovated Public Governance (ICPM 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icpm-18.2018.36.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFernando, Piyum. „Tools for Public Participation in Science“. In C&C '19: Creativity and Cognition. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3326560.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBaros, Z., und L. Dávid. „Public participation in urban noise prevention“. In The Sustainable World. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/sw100201.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePilav, Adia, Emira Tanović-Mikulec, Suada Branković und Vedran Đido. „HYPERTENSION – A PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM“. In Symposium with International Participation HEART AND … Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5644/pi2019.181.04.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBerichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Public participation"
Rood, Jason. Public Participation in Emergency Management. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.333.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBradbury, Judith A., Kristi M. Branch und Elizabeth L. Malone. An Evaluation of DOE-EM Public Participation Programs. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), Februar 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/15003670.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCheung, Iris, Margarita Kloss, Rich Brown und Alan Meier. Using Public Participation to Improve MELs Energy Data Collection. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), März 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1129521.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleResearch Institute (IFPRI), International Food Policy. Power, politics, and performance: community participation in South African public works programs. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/0896291472rr143.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMcMakin, A. H., D. L. Henrich, C. A. Kuhlman und G. W. White. Innovative techniques and tools for public participation in U.S. Department of Energy programs. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), Juli 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/650255.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePrisacariu, Roxana. Roma right to effective participation in public affairs – between soft and hard law. Fribourg (Switzerland): IFF, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.51363/unifr.diff.2015.03.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCarnes, S. A., M. Schweitzer, E. B. Peelle, A. K. Wolfe und J. F. Munro. Performance measures for evaluating public participation activities in DOE`s Office of Environmental Management. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/366507.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCarnes, S. A. Performance Measures for Evaluating Public Participation Activities in the Office of Environmental Management (DOE). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), Februar 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/777617.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMunch-Petersen, J. Public participation in environmental impact assessment of hydropower plants in Nepal: a context-specific approach. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5337/2017.215.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRomero, Jose Vicente, Hernando Vargas-Herrera, Pamela Cardozo und Andrés Murcia. Effects of foreign participation in the colombian local public debt market on domestic financial conditions. Banco de la República de Colombia, Mai 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32468/be.1115.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle