Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Politics“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Politics" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Politics":
Dr. Kosim. „LAW POLITICS IN SHARIA PERSPECTIVE“. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 7, Nr. 4 (07.09.2019): 297–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7438.
Garver, Newton. „Politics, Politics, Politics“. International Studies in Philosophy 29, Nr. 1 (1997): 19–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil19972913.
Dewantara, Agustinus Wisnu. „POLITIK MENURUT FOUCAULT DALAM “THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE” DAN RELEVANSINYA BAGI MULTIKULTURALISME INDONESIA“. JPAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Katolik 15, Nr. 8 (10.11.2018): 12–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.34150/jpak.v15i8.81.
Kishore, Jugal. „Politics of COVID-19: Political Epidemiology of and Pandemics“. Epidemiology International 05, Nr. 04 (20.11.2020): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.24321/2455.7048.202025.
Firmansyah, Muhamad Ferdy. „PENGARUH KOMUNIKASI POLITIC ENTERTAINMENT MELALUI IKLAN TERHADAP TINGKAT KETERPILIHAN PARTAI POLITIK PADA PEMILIHAN UMUM 2019“. Jurnal Gama Societa 3, Nr. 1 (23.04.2020): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jgs.46394.
Zhifeng, Peng. „Formation and evolution of informal politics in Kazakhstan“. BULLETIN of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University.Political Science. Regional Studies. Oriental Studies. Turkology Series. 145, Nr. 4 (2023): 154–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.32523/2616-6887/2023-145-4-154-164.
Wałdoch, Marcin. „The meandres of politics of history in the III Polish Republic territorial self-governments units“. Studia Gdańskie. Wizje i rzeczywistość XIV (03.06.2018): 49–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.2525.
OLIVEIRA, Marcos Antônio Bessa. „(Des)política para corpos-política na arte, na cultura e na educação“. INTERRITÓRIOS 6, Nr. 10 (14.04.2020): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.33052/inter.v6i10.244891.
AGUIRRE, BASILIA, und FABIANA DA CUNHA SADDI. „A fantasia política ou a política da fantasia?“ Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 18, Nr. 2 (Juni 1998): 362–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-31571998-1275.
Edward Mallot, J. „BODY POLITICS AND THE BODY POLITIC“. Interventions 8, Nr. 2 (Juli 2006): 165–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698010600780992.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Politics":
Cristancho, Mantilla Camilo. „Political disagreement in contentious politics“. Doctoral thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/283430.
Disagreement is a central component of politics, for it extends and persists across all ideological stances and all issues of policy. Challenging opposing views and defending personal perspectives, both in electoral contexts and in contentious politics, greatly determine how we experience politics daily. Consequently, negotiating disagreement is an underlying requisite for a normative aspect of how we tend to conceive democracy: considerate decision-making. This dissertation focuses on an attitudinal dimension of disagreement that involves cognitive processes that, in turn, can help people to better understand others and actively acknowledge differences: perspective taking. This dissertation addresses previous research on political disagreement by considering perspective taking as a relevant subject of study and, in doing so, shifting from general attitudes, such as tolerance and empathy, to particular attitude objects, such as opposing stances and political adversaries. This dissertation chiefly proposes to address potential attitudinal and behavioral consequences of disagreement in particular circumstances and to explore perceptions of blame attribution in highly divisive issues. Its design is grounded in the context of protest politics in order to leverage cases in which both public opinion is clearly divided and disagreement between positions is highly evident. This dissertation is composed of three papers. Paper 1 focuses on issue publics in their actual interactions with organizations by analyzing the informational environment of their specific issues. More specifically, it assesses individuals’ exposure to political disagreement in protest mobilization by questioning the role of organizations in linking opposing stances in such mobilization. As a result, it finds positive relationships between exposure to disagreement and perspective taking in the context of such mobilization, particularly in cases of demonstrations for Catalan independence and abortion in Spain. Paper 2 provides a unique measure of perspective taking built on direct mentions to political adversaries in order to gauge the extent to which mentioning adversaries relates to individuals’ motivations to demonstrate and turnout for a referendum on Catalan independence. The study draws upon data from a cross-sectional survey in Catalonia in order to confirm a demobilizing effect of exposure to political disagreement. In contrast to previous studies of voting behavior, the potential effect in this study depends upon group status. In particular, though defenders of the status quo become less resolved to demonstrate or to turn out, challengers do not when considering opposing viewpoints. This effect is mediated by group identity, which confirms the importance of the issue context in the cross-pressures hypothesis. Paper 3 investigates political disagreement by identifying individual, organizational, and contextual factors that explain differences between blame attributions in position issues. Data from protest surveys of demonstrators who participated in large-scale events in eight European cities between 2009 and 2011 reveal differences among perceptions regarding political adversaries, how demonstrators perceive disagreement, and how these perceptions vary among issues, organizational involvement, and contexts. As a result, the dissertation as a whole advances the research of attitudinal components of exposure, potential behavioral consequences, and perceptions of disagreement. Focusing on attitudes toward disagreement or political adversaries in the context of protest politics and highly divisive issues provides new insight into core questions of the literature addressing political disagreement. The dissertation’s findings can also broaden our understanding of contentious politics and everyday disagreement that might not be captured by electoral dynamics. The findings regarding the role of politically motivated organizations also pose practical implications in light of their roles in providing meaning to political conflict and mediating political adversaries. Establishing the potential influence of these roles on individual attitudes is relevant not only for academic research; it can also guide policy in order to promote civility.
Cohen, Joshua. „Money, Politics, and Political Equality“. MIT Press, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5446.
Crago, Tom. „The politics of political mistakes /“. Title page, table of contents and abstract only, 1996. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09AR/09arc8848.pdf.
Steward, Aaron L. „Political warfare and contentious politics“. Thesis, Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/45947.
This thesis examines if increased Department of Defense (DOD) involvement in political warfare (PW) is justified through a qualitative, comparative analysis of U.S. PW actions conducted by the Department of State, Central Intelligence Agency, and DOD in two Cold War cases: Italy from 1943–1948 and Chile from 1961–1973. Concepts of strategy and social movement models of Doug McAdam, Charles Tilly, and Sidney Tarrow are applied to historical PW actions, both overt and covert. The case-study analysis clarifies each agency’s conduct of PW and develops analytical tools to classify PW actions by approach and impact within the political setting. Data was collected from archives, declassified government documents, and expert analyses. Results indicate that, compared to other U.S. agencies, the DOD had a limited direct role in PW in the cases studied, but was an important enabler. In applying models of social movement theory to historical analysis, this thesis identifies and develops the contentious politics mobilization model’s potential use in planning and evaluating PW strategies.
Khnifess, Amir. „Israel and the Druze political action : between politics of loyalty and politics of violence“. Thesis, SOAS, University of London, 2015. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/22832/.
Woodcraft, David Robert. „A 'politick engine' : astrology and politics 1678-1715“. Thesis, University of Warwick, 1997. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/4198/.
Bonagura, Antonio <1958>. „WELFARE MUNICIPALE “Politica Locale, tra politics e Policy”“. Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/7231.
Sir, Aslan Yavuz. „Political Modernization And Informal Politics In Uzbekistan“. Master's thesis, METU, 2007. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12608637/index.pdf.
Loudes, C. M. H. „Increasing women's political representation : law into politics“. Thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.273116.
Childs, Sarah. „Women's political representation in contemporary British politics“. Thesis, Kingston University, 2000. http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/20645/.
Bücher zum Thema "Politics":
Oniororo, Niyi. Politics! dirty politics. Ibadan: Ororo Publications, 1991.
Woodcraft, David Robert. A 'Politick Engine': Astrology and politics 1678-1715. [s.l.]: typescript, 1997.
Mazzei, Franco. World politics: Appunti e riflessioni sulla politica mondiale. Napoli: L'Orientale, 2010.
Ferguson, Yale H. A world of polities: Essays on global politics. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2007.
Montmollin, Olivier De. Settlement and politics in three classic Maya polities. Madison, Wis: Prehistory Press, 1995.
Jan, Waszink, Hrsg. Politica: Six books of politics or political instruction. Assen (Netherlands): Royal Van Gorcum, 2004.
Robins, Lynton. Politics pal for politics students. Oadby, Leics: Politics PAL, 1994.
Robins, Lynton. Politics pal for politics students. Oadby, Leics: Politics PAL, 1993.
Robins, Lynton. Politics pal for politics students. Oadby, Leics: Politics PAL, 1997.
Robins, Lynton. Politics pal for politics students. Oadby, Leics: Politics PAL, 1996.
Buchteile zum Thema "Politics":
Greetham, Bryan. „Politics: Political Theories“. In Philosophy, 384–401. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-72563-2_27.
Newey, Glen. „Political Philosophy and Politics“. In After Politics, 15–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780333977873_2.
Cohen de Lara, Emma. „Aristotle’s Politics: Ethical Politics or Political Realism?“ In Aristotle’s Practical Philosophy, 13–33. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64825-5_2.
Kubicek, Paul. „Political culture and citizen politics“. In European Politics, 245–84. Third edition. | Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003028758-8.
Christoffersen, Henrik, Michelle Beyeler, Reiner Eichenberger, Peter Nannestad und Martin Paldam. „Political Institutions and Politics“. In The Good Society, 139–65. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37238-4_6.
Kloss, Günther. „Political System and Politics“. In West Germany, 12–73. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20663-6_2.
McCabe, Darren. „Making Organisational Politics Political“. In Changing Change Management, 152–73. New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge studies in organizational change & development ; 22: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429029981-9.
Yi-chong, Xu, und Patrick Weller. „Governance: Political, not Politics“. In Inside the World Bank, 175–92. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230100084_8.
Ekstrand, Thomas. „Political Theology, Theological Politics“. In Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, 1782–85. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1190.
Drake, Helen. „Politics and Political Culture“. In Contemporary France, 64–92. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36688-6_4.
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Politics":
Kutlu, Asuman. „THE INTERNET AND POLITICS: TRANSFORMATION OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION“. In International Conference on Research in Humanities and Social Sciences. Acavent, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.33422/icrhs.2018.12.04.
Chaerowati, Dede Lilis, Nova Yuliati und Mochamad Rochim. „Empowering Women in Politics through Women's Political Organization“. In Proceedings of the Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/sores-18.2019.46.
Sihidi, Iradhad, Laeli Khanifah und Achmad Romadhan. „The Politics of Gender in Indonesia’s Political Parties“. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019 – Humanity, Education and Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.62.
Damanik, Ahmad Taufan. „General Election: Between Money Politics and Political Identity“. In 1st International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2016). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icosop-16.2017.60.
Sarachan, Jeremy H. „Programming Politics“. In SIGCSE '19: The 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3293762.
Bereznyakov, Dmitry V., und Sergey V. Kozlov. „Memory politics “from above” from political communicative studies perspective“. In Communication and Cultural Studies: History and Modernity. Novosibirsk State University, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/978-5-4437-1258-1-15-20.
Azmy, Ana Sabhana. „Political Literacy and Money Politics in Indonesia The Phenomena of Money Politics in Jakarta's Local Election on 2017“. In Third International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICSPS 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icsps-17.2018.41.
Zuborova, Viera. „BUZZWORDS ON LOCAL POLICY? POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AND POLITICAL DISCOURSES OF NATIONAL POLITICS.“ In 2nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2015. Stef92 Technology, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2015/b21/s4.004.
Lee, Myong Soo. „Environment and politics“. In 2008 Third International Forum on Strategic Technologies (IFOST). IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ifost.2008.4602890.
Aiello, Luca Maria, Daniele Quercia und Eva Roitmann. „Hearts and Politics“. In DH'18: International Digital Health Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3194658.3194678.
Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Politics":
Vieira, António. Politics and Governance. Basel, Switzerland: Librello, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.12924/librello.pag.
Murphy, Kevin, und Andrei Shleifer. Persuasion in Politics. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Januar 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10248.
Bordalo, Pedro, Marco Tabellini und David Yang. Stereotypes and Politics. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Mai 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w27194.
Colonnelli, Emanuele, Valdemar Pinho Neto und Edoardo Teso. Politics At Work. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Juni 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w30182.
Anwar, Shamena, Patrick Bayer und Randi Hjalmarsson. Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Mai 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w21145.
Acemoglu, Daron. Why Not a Political Coase Theorem? Social Conflict, Commitment and Politics. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Dezember 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w9377.
Campante, Filipe, Ruben Durante und Francesco Sobbrio. Politics 2.0: The Multifaceted Effect of Broadband Internet on Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Mai 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w19029.
Smith, Bradley J. On Politics and Airpower. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada401916.
Helpman, Elhanan. Politics and Trade Policy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Oktober 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w5309.
Alesina, Alberto, und Alex Cukierman. The Politics of Ambiguity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Dezember 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w2468.