Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Podhoretz, Norman“

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Podhoretz, Norman" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Podhoretz, Norman"

1

Schneider, G. L. „Norman Podhoretz: A Biography“. Journal of American History 98, Nr. 1 (01.06.2011): 271–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jar013.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Taheri, Amir. „World War IV by Norman Podhoretz“. American Foreign Policy Interests 30, Nr. 2 (18.04.2008): 122–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803920802022720.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Feinman, Ronald L. „A Review of “Norman Podhoretz: A Biography”“. History: Reviews of New Books 40, Nr. 3 (Juli 2012): 92–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03612759.2012.669302.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

ffytche, Matt. „Freud and the Neocons: The Narrative of a Political Encounter from 1949–2000“. Psychoanalysis and History 15, Nr. 1 (Januar 2013): 5–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/pah.2013.0120.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This article examines the impact of Freud on conservative liberal intellectuals in America particularly during the Cold War. It argues that, compared with studies of the ‘radical’ or left-wing assimilations of psychoanalysis, the Freud of the political Right has been relatively neglected. It concentrates on three figures in particular – Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz and Leo Strauss, all of whom were a major influence on the formation of American neoconservatism, and ultimately on the Bush administration at the time of the War on Terror. The article also examines the role of Lionel Trilling in mediating Freudian ideas to Kristol and Podhoretz, who were disaffected with the progressive aspects of liberalism, and shifted their allegiance to the Right by the 1980s. Freud's work, especially Civilization and its Discontents, functions as an ideological landmark at the borderline of their reflections on religion, morality, the failures of democracy and the foundations of social order.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Peter Pham, J. „World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism by Norman Podhoretz“. American Foreign Policy Interests 29, Nr. 6 (13.12.2007): 451–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803920701777036.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Frontain, Raymond-Jean. „Protesting Normalcy: Norman Podhoretz, A. L. Rowse, and the Conservative Refashioning of Homosexual Friendships“. Intertexts 15, Nr. 2 (2011): 125–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/itx.2011.0015.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Sarias Rodriguez, David. „Race and the Early American Conservative Movement (1955-1970)“. Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas 24, Nr. 2 (21.06.2021): 223–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rpub.71020.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
From its inception with the first number of the magazine of opinion National Review and up to the advent of the Presidency of Richard Nixon the early American conservative movement struggled with the rising tide of civil rights protest and reform. This article examines the correspondence and published primary sources penned by leading members of the American conservative movement so as to offer a comprehensive, chronologically ordered assessment of the evolution of the views on racial inequality offered by the key constituent ideological subcommunities within the American conservative movement: the traditionalists gathered around the pages of National Review, the “neoliberals” led by Milton Friedman y Friedrich von Hayek, the Southern, white conservatives and, lastly, the neoconservatives, which headed by Irving Kristol and Norman Podhoretz articulated much of such views in a manner palatable to a significant segment of the American political mainstream.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Hurley, Brian. „On the Aesthetics and Politics of Neoconservatism in Postwar Japan and America“. Comparative Literature Studies 61, Nr. 1 (Februar 2024): 93–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.61.1.0093.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
ABSTRACT This article explores the aesthetic and political dimensions of neoconservative thought in postwar Japan and America. Although neoconservatism today is most often associated with hawkish foreign policy positions and the mythos of American hegemony, it first emerged in the realm of 1960s and post-1960s cultural criticism, much of which was composed by right-of-center literary intellectuals in particular. This article explores how in that earlier context, one of the most distinctive models for answering the cultural questions that motivated the emergence of neoconservatism as an article of global thought appeared in a body of writing centered on Japan. Putting the ideas expressed by the noted American neoconservatives Irving Kristol and Norman Podhoretz into dialogue with the writings of the conservative Japanese literary critic Etō Jun, the ruminations on Japanese cultural conservatism by the American scholar of Japanese literature Edward Seidensticker, the memoirs of the Sony CEO Morita Akio and the former Japanese prime minister Abe Shinzō, and the writings of the noted Japanese neoconservative novelist-turned-politician Ishihara Shintarō, the article argues that the articulation of neoconservative ideals in postwar Japan ultimately provided a model to conservative market advocates worldwide for how to integrate the seemingly incompatible logics of community and capitalism through a cultural synthesis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Rodden, John. „“The Rope That Connects Me Directly with You”: John Wain and the Movement Writers' Orwell“. Albion 20, Nr. 1 (1988): 59–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4049798.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
No British writer has had a greater impact on the Anglo-American generation which came of age in the decade following World War II than George Orwell. His influence has been, and continues to be, deeply felt by intellectuals of all political stripes, including the Marxist Left (Raymond Williams, E. P. Thompson), the anarchist Left (George Woodcock, Nicolas Walter), the American liberal-Left (Irving Howe), American neoconservatives (Norman Podhoretz), and the Anglo-American Catholic Right (Christopher Hollis, Russell Kirk).Perhaps Orwell's broadest imprint, however, was stamped upon the only literary group which has ever regarded him as a model: the Movement writers of the 1950s. Unlike the above-mentioned groups, which have consisted almost entirely of political intellectuals rather than writers—and whose members have responded to him as a political critic first and a writer second—some of the Movement writers saw Orwell not just as a political intellectual but also as the man of letters and/or literary stylist whom they aspired to be.The Movement writers were primarily an alliance of poet-critics. The “official” members numbered nine poets and novelists; a few other writers and critics loomed on the periphery. Their acknowledged genius, if not leading publicist, was Philip Larkin, who later became Britain's poet laureate. Orwell's plain voice influenced the tone and attitude of Larkin's poetry and that of several other Movement poets, especially Robert Conquest and D. J. Enright. But Orwell shone as an even brighter presence among the poet-novelists, particularly John Wain and Kingsley Amis, whose early fictional anti-heroes were direct descendants of Gordon Comstock in Keep the Aspidistra Flying (1936) and George Bowling in Coming Up for Air (1939).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Balthaser, Benjamin. „Exceptional Whites, Bad Jews: Racial Subjectivity, Anti-Zionism, and the Jewish New Left“. Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies 41, Nr. 2 (2023): 34–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sho.2023.a911218.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Abstract: It is often assumed that the 1967 Arab-Israeli War led to the "wholesale conversion of the Jews to Zionism," as Norman Podhoretz famously phrased it. This "conversion" is equally, if often less explicitly, said to coincide with the end of the era of Jewish marginality in the U.S. and West more broadly, as Jews of European descent were half-included, half-conscripted, into normative structures of whiteness, class ascension, and citizenship. While this epochal shift in Jewish racial formation and political allegiance is undeniable especially in the context of large Jewish secular and religious institutions, at the time this "conversion" was seen as anything but inevitable. Many Jewish liberals, including Irving Howe, Seymour Lipset, and Nathan Glazer, and reactionaries such as Meir Kahane, saw Jewish overrepresentation and hypervisibility in New Left organizations such as Students for a Democratic Society, the Youth International Party, and the Socialist Workers Party as a sign that Jewish youth rejected Zionism as well as the Jewish rise into the middle class. That retrospectively we see Jewish racial formation and political alignment after 1967 as a fait accompli often relies on the erasure not only of mass Jewish participation in the New Left, but also the erasure of the New Left's anti-imperialist political commitments, including critique of expansive Israeli militarism and the settler colonial assumptions underlying Zionism. Looking at memoirs, pamphlets, histories, and original interviews with Jewish participants in the New Left, this article excavates the political alignments of Jewish New Left activists, exploring opposition to the U.S.'s new support of the Israeli state as well as the changing Ashkenazi Jewish racial assignment. Rather than finding Third World and Black Power critiques of Israel antisemitic, it was precisely the Jewish New Left's politics of international and multiracial solidarity that encouraged their support for Black Power critiques of Zionism. In this way, Jewish members of the New Left also attempted to critically challenge their own whiteness, aligning support for Israel after 1967 with support for the racial and economic structures of militarism and capitalism at home.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Bücher zum Thema "Podhoretz, Norman"

1

Jeffers, Thomas L. Norman Podhoretz: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Jeffers, Thomas L. Norman Podhoretz: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Winchell, Mark Royden. Neoconservative criticism: Norman Podhoretz, Kenneth S. Lynn, and Joseph Epstein. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1991.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Winchell, Mark Royden. Neoconservative criticism: Norman Podhoretz, Kenneth S. Lynn, and Joseph Epstein. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1991.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

1946-, Jeffers Thomas L., Hrsg. The Norman Podhoretz reader: A selection of his writings from the 1950s through the 1990s. New York: Free Press, 2004.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Jeffers, Thomas L. Norman Podhoretz: A Biography. Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Jeffers, Thomas L. Norman Podhoretz: A Biography. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Jeffers, Thomas L. Norman Podhoretz: A Biography. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Norman Podhoretz and Commentary Magazine. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2010.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Abrams, Nathan. Norman Podhoretz and Commentary Magazine: The Rise and Fall of the Neocons. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2012.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Buchteile zum Thema "Podhoretz, Norman"

1

Inbari, Motti. „“Is it good for the Jews?” The conversion of Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine, from the New Left to neoconservativism“. In The Making of Modern Jewish Identity, 43–66. London ; New York, NY : Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. | Series: Routledge Jewish Studies Series: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429027390-3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Jurdem, Laurence R. „A Friend in the White House“. In Paving the Way for Reagan, 169–84. University Press of Kentucky, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813175843.003.0009.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Over the course of the Reagan presidency, those who had written for National Review and Commentary shifted from their roles as policy analysts to putting their policy recommendations into practice as members of the foreign, domestic, and speechwriting staff in the Reagan administration. Figures like Jeane Kirkpatrick, Carl Gershman, Aram Bakshian, Anthony Dolan, and many others played a key role in the creation of one of the most ideological administrations in recent memory. While neither William F. Buckley Jr. nor Norman Podhoretz had active roles in the administration, their influence was nonetheless felt as those who had worked for them utilized their ideas and language in helping construct a consistent ideology that played a significant role in how rhetoric was designed and policy was implemented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Dayan, Colin. „Salvific Animality, or Another Look at Faulkner’s South“. In Faulkner and History, 21–35. University Press of Mississippi, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781496809971.003.0002.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Nietzsche claimed that “The animal lives unhistorically.” This chapter takes issue with this view and the oppositions on which it rests: between the human and the animal, history and the unhistorical. Against Norman Podhoretz, who complained in the 1950s that “a genuine sense of history” is absent from Faulkner's works, it is argued that “the most astonishing pages in The Hamlet suggest a history beyond the reach of customary written history.” Faulkner accesses this alternate historicity through style and subject matter, foregrounding sentience, sensation, and rural creatures and landscapes that in their strangeness and seething vitality “betoken the surfacing of suppressed histories that might or might not be told” by, to, or about the inhabitants of Frenchman's Bend, caught as they are in the turbulence of post-Reconstruction social and economic history.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

„chapter 7 “ ‘Sissy,’ the Most Dreaded Epithet of an American Boyhood”: Norman Podhoretz and Jewish Masculinity on the Right“. In Write like a Man, 229–68. Princeton University Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780691255620-010.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Rozell, Mark J. „Norman Podhoretz’s Polemical Commentaries“. In American Conservative Opinion Leaders, 119–33. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429033506-10.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Merton, Thomas. „“The Sounds are Furious”“. In The Dixie Limited. University Press of Mississippi, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781496803382.003.0032.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This chapter discusses the various criticisms leveled against William Faulkner. Thirty years ago, when Faulkner was at the height of his powers, the critics were doing their best to write him off as a failure. Even the few who, like Conrad Aiken, numbered themselves among his “passionate admirers” had serious reservations about Faulkner's style. He was dismissed as an irrelevant oddity, a pessimist, a sensationalist, a poseur, a mere “Southern writer.” He wrote of the South but what he wrote was trifling because it was myth rather than sociology. The chapter examines Norman Podhoretz's criticism of A Fable and considers the present collection of Faulkner criticism, Faulkner: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited with an introduction by Robert Penn Warren.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!

Zur Bibliographie