Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Philoctetes (Sophocles)“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Philoctetes (Sophocles)" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Philoctetes (Sophocles)"
Jones, Richard, Sophocles und R. G. Ussher. „Sophocles: Philoctetes“. Classical World 85, Nr. 2 (1991): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4351048.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDavidson, John. „HOMER AND SOPHOCLES' PHILOCTETES“. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40, Supplement_66 (01.07.1995): 25–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1995.tb02177.x.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWhitby, Mary. „Telemachus Transformed? The Origins of Neoptolemus in Sophocles' Philoctetes“. Greece and Rome 43, Nr. 1 (April 1996): 31–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gr/43.1.31.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTessitore, Aristide. „Justice, Politics, and Piety in Sophocles′ Philoctetes“. Review of Politics 65, Nr. 1 (2003): 61–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500036536.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDunn, Francis. „Narrative Bonds in Sophocles’ Philoctetes“. Mouseion 17, S1 (Februar 2020): 31–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/mous.17.s1.004.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHawkins, Anne Hunsaker. „Ethical Tragedy and Sophocles' "Philoctetes"“. Classical World 92, Nr. 4 (1999): 337. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4352287.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTaplin, Oliver. „THE MAPPING OF SOPHOCLES' PHILOCTETES“. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 34, Nr. 1 (01.12.1987): 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1987.tb00554.x.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFalkner, Thomas M. „Containing Tragedy: Rhetoric and Self-Representation in Sophocles' "Philoctetes"“. Classical Antiquity 17, Nr. 1 (01.04.1998): 25–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25011073.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleO'Higgins, Dolores. „Narrators and Narrative in the Philoctetes of Sophocles“. Ramus 20, Nr. 1 (1991): 37–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00002824.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDrake, Drake. „Natural and Divine orders: The Politics of Sophocles’ Philoctetes“. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 24, Nr. 2 (2007): 179–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/20512996-90000113.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Philoctetes (Sophocles)"
Ridd, Stephen John. „Sophocles' 'Philoctetes' : a study“. Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.335730.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleJanz, Timothy. „The scholia to Sophocles' Philoctetes“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2005. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.419030.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAxelgard, Christian Wiggo. „Speaking for Himself: Odysseus and Rhetoric in Sophocles' Philoctetes“. BYU ScholarsArchive, 2013. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3694.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTaousiani, A. „Sophocles' lying tale : a study of dolos and fiction in the Philoctetes“. Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2011. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1336531/.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSpiegel, Francesca. „Exclusion in Sophocles“. Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/21979.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSocial exclusion as a literary theme is common to all of Sophocles' fully extant plays as well as some of the longer fragments. The variety of settings is wide, between exclusion from the family like for example in Electra, exclusion from the city as in the case of Oedipus, from a regiment of the armed forces like in Ajax or Philoctetes, or even humankind, like with Tereus. This inquiry sets out to present, taxonomize and unpack Sophoclean discourses of exclusion and their attaining literary tropes of the pathological, the bestial, the brutish, the monstrous, and the so-called uncivilized. The aim is to demonstrate how deeply implicated the whole cast of characters and their language are in the process of a tragedy unfolding, rather than the causes of tragedy being lodged in the doings of one protagonist alone. One key point argued here is that, instead of taking 'the isolation of the tragic hero' as fait accompli, exclusion is a dynamic process that often takes up the entire plot arc of a tragedy. In the space of extrinsic characterization, it is argued that a process of rhetorical erasure and overwriting of identity takes place, where peer groups gradually dismantle a formerly well-established identity and re-assign a new and undesirable one. It is shown how the protagonists seek to resist, lament or somehow negotiate this process through long and expansive speeches of futile self-reinstatement. In the synthesis of both, it is argued that Sophocles' deployment of the theme puts a critical spotlight on the rhetorics of exclusion and its discourses of the bestial, the brutal, and especially the pathological, which embed and frame the work's overall literary, cultural and dramatic effects.
Gemelli, Cesar Lopes. „Neoptólemo no Filoctetes de Sófocles“. reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/67273.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis work aims to study the character Neoptolemus in the tragedy Philoctetes (c. 409 BC) by Sophocles (c. 496-406 BC). Neoptolemus is initially brought to Lemnos by Odysseus with the mission of helping bring Philoctetes and the bow of Heracles back to Troy. Upon discovering the procedure of this mission proposed by Odysseus, Neoptolemus hesitates, suggesting they should openly persuade Philoctetes instead of tricking him. Neoptolemus offers some resistance, but eventually accepts Odysseus' sophistry. Upon making contact with Philoctetes, Neoptolemus gradually learns about the ethical model that he gave up by accepting Odysseus' proposal. This creates a dilemma in which the young Neoptolemus must decide how to act. The act of deciding in itself is cause for hesitation for the youngster. By choosing one attitude or another, Neoptolemus must face all the consequences of his choice, including the inability to go back, that is, back to the moment before the decision was made, a childish situation in which the possibilities have not yet been reduced because of each of his choices. In the final moments before the arrival of Heracles, Neoptolemus finally decides his own path, which is at an intermediate position in relation to the choices that were presented to him and he accepts the consequences of his choice.
OLIVEIRA, RODRIGO SANTOS PINTO DE. „LIE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF PLATO S LESSER HÍPPIAS, HOMER S ILIAD AND SOPHOCLES PHILOCTETES: AS TRUE AND SIMPLE, AND ODYSSEUS, MULTIFACETED AND FALSE“. PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2018. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=35900@1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO
Tendo como princípio a inquietação causada pelo questionamento de Sócrates no Hípias Menor de Platão (363a-364c): Qual personagem, entre Aquiles e Odisseu, seria superior? A presente dissertação leva em consideração o direcionamento do diálogo acerca do que seja a mentira segundo a ótica platônica, e dedica-se especificamente a descobrir quem destes poderia ser compreendido como um mentiroso: entre Aquiles e Odisseu, quem estaria mentindo? Primeiramente a pesquisa deseja averiguar as definições que sejam provenientes do diálogo platônico, para em seguida retornar para a cena da epopeia homérica em que seja possível definir para qual herói caberia a alcunha de mentiroso. Abalizado pelos critérios extraídos do diálogo entre Sócrates e Hípias, a busca pela cena que atenda às definições necessárias para a mentira se direciona às tragédias, onde o Filoctetes de Sófocles se sobressai entre as demais remanescentes, por atender aos critérios e nos permitir examinar a mentira de modo a justapor definições e critérios à cena que melhor exemplifica o caso. Em suma, metodologicamente tenta-se conjecturar para além do que se vê no diálogo Hípias Menor, buscando exemplo mais oportuno do que aquele dado pelo sofista a Sócrates, contudo, sem deixar de atentar para os argumentos e definições expostas, deseja-se chegar mais próximo de uma compreensão menos aporética deste diálogo, lançando mão do exemplo como um recurso didático que pode ajudar concomitantemente na compreensão do que seja a mentira, ao mesmo passo que se observe quem seja um mentiroso.
Taking as a principle the uneasiness caused by Socrates questioning in Plato s Hippias Minor (363a-364c): which character, between Achilles and Odysseus, would be superior? This dissertation takes into account the direction of the dialogue about the lie according to the Platonic perspective, and is dedicated specifically to discover who could be understood as a liar: between Achilles and Odysseus, who would be lying? First, the research wants to ascertain the definitions that come from the Platonic dialogue, and then return to the scene of the Homeric epic where is possible to define which hero would be named as the liar. By the assignments taken as criteria drawn from the dialogue between Socrates and Hippias, the search for the scene that meets the necessary definitions for the lie is targeted to the tragedies, where the Sophocle s Philoctetes excels among the plays remaining fully, to revel the criteria and allowing us to examine the lie in order to juxtapose definitions and criteria to the scene that best exemplifies the case. In sum, this dissertation tries methodologically to conjecture for beyond what is seen in Hippias Minor, seeking a more opportune example than that given by the Sophist to Socrates, yet without neglecting the arguments and definitions set forth, it is desired to get closer to a complete understanding of this dialogue, using example as a didactic resource that can help concomitantly in the understanding of what is the lie, at the same time as observing who could be a liar.
Dagios, Mateus. „Neoptólemo entre a cicatriz e a chaga : lógos sofistico, peithó e areté na tragédia Filoctetes de Sófocles“. reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/70646.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis work aims to analyze how Sophocles discusses before the Athenian polis’ citizens sophistic logos, the ambiguous position of sophists, and their impact as a debate about values and meanings and as a conflict with the ethical standards related to arete. It is examined how the characters Odysseus, Philoctetes, and Neoptolemus deal with the possibilities, limits, and uses of speech in their interactions, rendering persuasion, peitho, as especially problematic. Considering that tragic poetry examines conflicts in meanings and standpoints, the characters’ different stances about logos are regarded as representative of opposing views available in Athens’ cultural repertoire in the last quarter of the fifth century BC. Theoretically, Greek tragedy is taken as a political art that operates with both myth and polis, its issues and vocabularies, so that Sophocles’ Philoctetes (409 BC) could be interpreted as a discussion of issues of great concern for Athens such as communication and education, both then inseparable from the rise of the sophists.
Van, der Woude Peter William. „Translating Heaney: a study of Sweeney astray, The cure at Troy, and Beowulf“. Thesis, Rhodes University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1002256.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBinus, Joshua Robert. „Betrayed, Berserk, and Abandoned: War Trauma in Sophocles' Ajax and Philoctetes“. Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/5424.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGraduate
0294
0621
0465
jrbinus@aol.com
Bücher zum Thema "Philoctetes (Sophocles)"
Sophocles. Sophoclis Philoctetes. 3. Aufl. Stutgardiae: Teubner, 1996.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSophocles. Philoctetes. Studio City, CA: Players Press, 1999.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSophocles. Philoctetes. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1990.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSophocles. Philoctetes. Newbridge, Co. Kildare: Goldsmith Press, 1998.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenHeaney, Seamus. The cure at Troy: A version of Sophocles' Philoctetes. [Derry]: Field Day, 1990.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSophocles. The cure at Troy: A version of Sophocles' Philoctetes. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1991.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenHeaney, Seamus. The cure at Troy: A version of Sophocles' Philoctetes. London: Faber and Faber, 1991.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenHeaney, Seamus. The cure at Troy: A version of Sophocles' Philoctetes. New York: Noonday Press, 1991.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenHeaney, Seamus. The cure at Troy: A version of Sophocles'"Philoctetes". New York, New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux, 1991.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSophocles' Philoctetes and the great soul robbery / Norman Austin. Madison, Wis: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2011.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "Philoctetes (Sophocles)"
Sokolon, Marlene K. „Sophocles's Philoctetes“. In Making Sense of Diseases and Disasters, 146–55. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003197379-14.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Philoctetes:“. In Late Sophocles, 43–80. University of Michigan Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv3znzg2.7.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„PHILOCTETES“. In Sophocles: Second Thoughts, 103–13. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666252006.103.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMorwood, James. „Philoctetes“. In The Tragedies of Sophocles, 68–74. Liverpool University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9781904675716.003.0007.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Philoctetes“. In Brill's Companion to Sophocles, 149–66. BRILL, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004217621_010.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Philoctetes“. In The Plays of Sophocles. Bloomsbury Academic, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474233385.0011.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Philoctetes“. In Brill's Companion to the Reception of Sophocles, 77–145. BRILL, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004300941_004.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHeath, Malcolm. „Sophocles’ Philoctetes: A Problem Play?“ In Sophocles Revisited, 137–60. Oxford University PressOxford, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198130062.003.0008.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„II. Philoctetes“. In The Past in Aeschylus and Sophocles, 241–314. De Gruyter, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110257564.241.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBlanco, Chiara. „Death as Dehumanisation in Sophocles’ Philoctetes“. In Aspects of Death and the Afterlife in Greek Literature, 105–22. Liverpool University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621495.003.0006.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle