Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Paris Peace Conference d 1919-1920“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Paris Peace Conference d 1919-1920" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Paris Peace Conference d 1919-1920"
Mironova, E. M. „Russian Political Delegation, 1919–1920“. Modern History of Russia 11, Nr. 4 (2021): 871–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu24.2021.403.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBaigorri-Jalón, Jesús. „Conference Interpreting in the First International Labor Conference (Washington, D. C., 1919)“. Meta 50, Nr. 3 (02.11.2005): 987–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/011609ar.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTREMBETSKYI, Andriy. „DMYTRO VITOVSKYI IN THE UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHIC DISCOURSE OF THE 1920–1930“. Contemporary era 10 (2022): 275–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.33402/nd.2022-10-275-286.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHovhannisyan, Lilit. „Cilicia in the Documents of the U.S. State Department in 1919−1920“. Ցեղասպանագիտական հանդես 10, Nr. 1 (20.05.2022): 40–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.51442/jgs.0027.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePETRÁŠ, René. „Organisational aspects of the Paris Peace Conference (1919-1920)“. Central European Papers 3, Nr. 2 (01.09.2015): 34–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.25142/cep.2015.016.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDRECIN, Mihai D. „FREEMASONRY AND THE PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE (JANUARY 1919 – JUNE 1920)“. Annals of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Series on History and Archaeology 12, Nr. 2 (2020): 21–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.56082/annalsarscihist.2020.2.21.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDervishi, Erjon. „THE ALBANIAN QUESTION AT THE PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE DURING 1919-1920“. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola 2 (2020): 123–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.47305/jlia2020123d.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMiazga, Nikolai. „Paris Peace Conference of 1919–1920 and Prospects of the Belarusian Statehood“. Metamorphoses of history, Nr. 23 (2022): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.37490/mh2022232.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBarwiński, Marek. „Nationality issues on Polish maps prepared for the Paris Peace Conference 1919–1920“. Polish Cartographical Review 55, Nr. 1 (01.01.2023): 111–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pcr-2023-0009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCojocaru, Gheorghe. „Great Britain and the Paris treaty of Bessarabia of October 28, 1922. 100 years after the ratification“. Revista de istorie a Moldovei, Nr. 1-2(129-130) (November 2022): 117–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.58187/rim.129-130.05.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Paris Peace Conference d 1919-1920"
Imamoto, Shizuka. „Racial Equality Bill Japanese proposal at Paris Peace Conference : diplomatic manoeuvres and reasons for rejection /“. Electronic version, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/699.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThesis (MA (Hons))--Macquarie University (Division of Humanities, Dept. of Asian Languages), 2006.
Bibliography: leaves 137-160.
Introduction -- Anglo-Japanese relations and World War One -- Fear of Japan in Australia -- William Morris Hughes -- Japan's proposal and diplomacy at Paris -- Reasons for rejection : a discussion -- Conclusion.
Japan as an ally of Britain, since the signing of Anglo-Japanese Alliance in 1902, entered World War One at British request. During the Great War Japan fought Germany in Asia and afforded protection to Australia. After the conclusion of the War, a peace conference was held at Paris in 1919. As a victorious ally and as one of the Five Great Powers of the day, Japan participated at the Paris Peace Conference, and proposed racial equality to be enshrined in the Covenant of the League of Nations. This Racial Equality Bill, despite the tireless efforts of the Japanese delegates who engaged the representatives of other countries in intense diplomatic negotiations, was rejected. The rejection, a debatable issue ever since, has inspired many explanations including the theory that it was a deliberate Japanese ploy to achieve other goals in the agenda. This thesis has researched the reasons for rejection and contends that the rejection was not due to any one particular reason. Four key factors: a) resolute opposition from Australian Prime Minister Hughes determined to protect White Australia Policy, b) lack of British support, c) lack of US support, and d) lack of support from the British dominions of New Zealand, Canada and South Africa; converged to defeat the Japanese proposal. Japanese inexperience in international diplomacy evident from strategic and tactical mistakes, their weak presentations and communications, and enormous delays in negotiations, at Paris, undermined Japan's position at the conference, but the reasons for rejection of the racial equality proposal were extrinsic.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
xii, 188 leaves
Scogin, Katie Elizabeth. „Britain and the Supreme Economic Council 1919“. Thesis, North Texas State University, 1987. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc332330/.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePROTT, Volker. „International concepts and practices of borders : experts, ethnicity, and the Paris system in the early interwar period“. Doctoral thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/28048.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleExamining Board: Professor Heinz-Gerhard Haupt, EUI (Supervisor); Professor A. Dirk Moses, EUI (Second Reader); Doctor Bernhard Struck, University of St Andrews (External Examiner); Professor Donald Bloxham, University of Edinburgh (External Examiner).
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
The interwar period is key to the course international history took in the twentieth century. This thesis examines the conditions under which the new international order instituted after World War One led to violent local reactions. It traces American, British, and French expertise and policies from the peace planning processes begun just before the end of the First World War right up to the Paris peace talks in 1919. Furthermore, it addresses attempts by the League of Nations to stabilise the peace architecture in the 1920s and 1930s. The level of international politics is linked to two prominent 'Western' and 'Eastern' European case studies: the return of Alsace-Lorraine to France in 1918-19 and the Greco- Turkish conflict between 1919 and 1923. In both cases, border changes caused ethnic violence, albeit with very diverse outcomes. While France managed to contain the onset of ethnic cleansing, the Greek-Turkish conflict degenerated, resulting in a fully-fledged war that ended in the forced exchange of roughly 1.6 million civilians across the Aegean Sea. The study demonstrates that the use of ethnicity, as a concept and a political instrument, significantly shaped the course that conflict-prone local settings took. As a shorthand form of national self-determination, ethnicity informed expertise and political decisions on where to alter territorial borders. As a political instrument, it was a powerful tool for nationalist mobilisation. The dissertation concludes that one of the primary structural factors that contributed to the breakdown of the international order in the 1930s was the failure of the international community to provide an alternative to or to successfully contain ethnic and state-sponsored violence as the most effective means to 'correct' the perceived shortcomings of the Paris peace treaties.
Bücher zum Thema "Paris Peace Conference d 1919-1920"
Schelle, Karel. Paris peace conference, 1919-1920, and its influence. Brno: Novpress, 2009.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenLansing, Robert. The Peace Negotiations. Fairfield: 1st World Library, 2006.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenKidwai, Mushir Hosain. Paris Sulh Konferansı ve Osmanlının çöküşü. Çemberlitaş, İstanbul: Nehir Yayınları, 1991.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenMacmillan, Margaret Olwen. Lessons of history: The Paris Peace Conference of 1919. [Ottawa, Ont.]: Dept. of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 2003.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenLansing, Robert. The Big Four and others of the Peace Conference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1990.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenMeng, Xianzhang. Shi jie zui jin zhi ju shi. [Beijing: Beijing zhong xian tuo fang ke ji fa zhan you xian gong si, 2012.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenNicolson, Harold. Peacemaking 1919: Being reminiscences of the Paris Peace Conference. Safety Harbor, FL: Simon Publications, 2001.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenLovin, Clifford R. A school for diplomats: The Paris Peace Conference of 1919. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1997.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSharp, Alan, und Sharp Alan. The Versailles settlement: Peacemaking in Paris, 1919. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenAndelman, David. A Shattered Peace. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2009.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "Paris Peace Conference d 1919-1920"
Marelja, Miran, Ozren Pilipović und Meta Ahtik. „The Protection of Minorities at the Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920)“. In Postwar Continuity and New Challenges in Central Europe, 1918–1923, 35–51. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003185017-4.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMoffat, Ian C. D. „Vision versus Reality: The Paris Peace Conference and Russia, January–February 1919“. In The Allied Intervention in Russia, 1918–1920, 165–85. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137435736_10.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOsiander, Andreas. „The Peace Conference of Paris, 1919–1920“. In The States System of Europe, 1640–1990, 249–315. Oxford University Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198278870.003.0005.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePommier, Daniel. „The Wilsonian Moment of the Azerbaijani Delegation in Paris (1919-1920)“. In Eurasiatica. Venice: Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-453-0/006.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMcFadden, David W. „The Bolsheviks and Economic Diplomacy, 1919-1920“. In Alternative Paths, 267–93. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195071870.003.0012.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Creation and Dissolution of the League of Nations“. In The United Nations System and its Predecessors, herausgegeben von Franz Knipping, 181–220. Oxford University PressOxford, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198764496.003.0003.
Der volle Inhalt der Quellede Mazza, Ethel Matala. „Disputes over Germany’s War Guilt“. In Guilt, 305–22. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197557433.003.0016.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle