Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Paradox“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Paradox" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Paradox":
Roskamm, Nikolai. „Ein multiples Paradox“. Migration und Soziale Arbeit, Nr. 2 (17.06.2021): 139–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3262/mig2102139.
Arancibía Carrizo, Juan Pablo. „Comunidad, Tragedia y Melancolía: Estudio para una Concepción Trágica de lo Político“. Revista Grafía- Cuaderno de trabajo de los profesores de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Universidad Autónoma de Colombia 10, Nr. 2 (14.07.2013): 111. http://dx.doi.org/10.26564/16926250.496.
O'Donnell, Thomas F. „“A paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox. This paradox”“. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 9, Nr. 5 (September 2021): 1087–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.04.017.
Duysens, Jacques, und Jorik Nonnekes. „Parkinson's Kinesia Paradoxa Is Not a Paradox“. Movement Disorders 36, Nr. 5 (03.03.2021): 1115–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28550.
Clark, Michael. „Paradox 9: Heraclitus' paradox“. Think 3, Nr. 9 (2005): 59–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1477175600002086.
Cannon, Helen B. „The Paradox of Paradox“. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 24, Nr. 2 (01.07.1991): 149–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/45227768.
Bush, Andrew. „A Paradox, A Paradox, A Most Ingenious Paradox!“ Chest 160, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2021): 1171–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.034.
Bush, Andrew. „A Paradox, A Paradox, A Most Ingenious Paradox!“ Chest 160, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2021): 1171–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.034.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. „Sounds of Silence. «Mystical» Paradox in the Atthakavagga“. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 15 (2000): 32–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/fejf2000.15.paradox.
Ronidin, Ronidin. „PEMBACAAN DEKONSTRUKSI CERPEN "ZINA" KARYA PUTU WIJAYA“. Puitika 11, Nr. 1 (08.04.2015): 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/puitika.11.1.36--51.2015.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Paradox":
Eldridge-Smith, Peter, und peter eldridge-smith@anu edu au. „The Liar Paradox and its Relatives“. The Australian National University. Faculty of Arts, 2008. http://thesis.anu.edu.au./public/adt-ANU20081016.173200.
Fäldt, Emma, und Nora Rønningen. „Välvillighetens Paradox“. Thesis, Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för hälsa och samhälle (HS), 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-26902.
Background: A third of those suffering from stroke acquire aphasia as a direct consequence. Inability to communicate may lead to depression, which is why it is of importance that the nurse adapts her care according to the patients’ abilities. Nurses’ knowledge about aphasia can help strengthen the patients’ self-esteem and enable a higher level of care. Aim: Portrait nurses’ care of patients with aphasia aswell as describing nurses’ experiences of caring for patients with aphasia– focusing on communication. Method: Structured qualitative literature review including eleven articles, majority originated from Scandinavia. The search for scientific papers was conducted by using the keywords stroke, communication and nurses. Result: The articles generated three main themes: Non-verbal communication, tools and nurses’ reception. The nurse used non-verbal communication by touch, body language and active observation of the patient. Tools used was dividing and repeating information. Speak loud and clearly. Show interest and that there was time and help the patient finding the words by guessing. Using the relatives as a communication tool same as pictures, illustrations and writing as support in the communication process. The third theme, nurses’ reception, included that nurses tended to have a task based communication and directed the dialogue or excluded the patient when others were around. Insecurity due to lack of knowledge can be an explanation for this behavior.Conclusion: Although good intentions with reception of patients with aphasia, this showed reverse effect when the nurse tended to control the conversation due to insecurity by a lack of knowledge. To reach understanding both parts had to be active in the communication process.
Weber, Zach. „Paradox and foundation“. Connect to thesis, 2009. http://repository.unimelb.edu.au/10187/5515.
Clapham, D. „The sorties paradox“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 1987. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.381805.
Whittle, Bruno. „Paradox and hierarchy“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.410999.
Pinder, Mark. „Meaning and paradox“. Thesis, University of Bristol, 2013. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627928.
Young, Richard William Royce. „The satisfaction paradox“. Thesis, University of East Anglia, 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.368353.
Mosmer, Reza. „The Tractatus paradox“. Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2013. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/4397/.
Montagne, Twyla Dawn. „Paradox of Love“. Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1212514785.
Scholz, Barbara Caroline. „Kripke's Wittgensteinian paradox /“. The Ohio State University, 1990. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487677267728538.
Bücher zum Thema "Paradox":
Clark, Michael. Paradoxes from A to Z. London: Taylor & Francis Group Plc, 2004.
Clark, Michael. Paradoxes from A to Z. 3. Aufl. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012.
Clark, Michael. Paradoxes from A to Z. 2. Aufl. New York: Routledge, 2007.
M, Sainsbury R. Paradoxes. 3. Aufl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
M, Sainsbury R. Paradoxes. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
M, Sainsbury R. Paradoxes. 2. Aufl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
D'Agostini, Franca. Paradossi. Roma: Carocci, 2009.
Stevenson, Ronald. The Paderewski paradox =: Le paradoxe Paderewski. Lincoln: Klavar Music Foundation of Great Britain, 1992.
Field, Hartry H. Saving truth from paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Joe, Salerno, Hrsg. New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Buchteile zum Thema "Paradox":
David, H. A., und A. W. F. Edwards. „Yule’s Paradox (“Simpson’s Paradox”)“. In Springer Series in Statistics, 137–43. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3500-0_19.
Vine, Tom. „Conclusion“. In Paradox, 193–223. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-12.
Vine, Tom. „Pedagogical Logic I“. In Paradox, 153–68. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-9.
Vine, Tom. „Paradox and Organization“. In Paradox, 80–102. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-5.
Vine, Tom. „Pedagogical Logic III“. In Paradox, 184–92. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-11.
Vine, Tom. „Paradox and Society“. In Paradox, 44–79. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-4.
Vine, Tom. „Pedagogical Logic II“. In Paradox, 169–83. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-10.
Vine, Tom. „Paradox and Nature“. In Paradox, 103–27. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-6.
Vine, Tom. „Introduction“. In Paradox, 1–16. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-1.
Vine, Tom. „Paradox and Art“. In Paradox, 19–43. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003203339-3.
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Paradox":
Stamnes, Bent. „Fermi paradox“. In SIGGRAPH '16: Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2897841.2964192.
Kiuntsli, Romana, Andriy Stepaniuk und Justyna Sobczak-Piąstka. „The paradox of the beautiful or the art paradox“. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON X-RAY MICROSCOPY – XRM2022. AIP Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0170369.
Götte, Jörg B. „Angular EPR Paradox“. In QUANTUM COMMUNICATION, MEASUREMENT AND COMPUTING. AIP, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1834433.
Guiasu, Silviu, Gian Paolo Beretta, Ahmed Ghoniem und George Hatsopoulos. „Reversibility Paradox Revisited“. In MEETING THE ENTROPY CHALLENGE: An International Thermodynamics Symposium in Honor and Memory of Professor Joseph H. Keenan. AIP, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2979020.
Mirnig, Alexander G., Rod McCall, Alexander Meschtscherjakov und Manfred Tscheligi. „The Insurer's Paradox“. In AutomotiveUI '19: 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344540.
You, Sangseok, Lionel P. Robert und Soo Young Rieh. „The Appropriation Paradox“. In CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732919.
Andre´, Jean, und Tony Pillay. „Increasing the Network Capacity: Is It Always the Best Choice?“ In 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference. ASMEDC, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2008-64258.
Miskowiec, Dariusz. „Quark-gluon plasma paradox“. In Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement - 4th International Workshop. Trieste, Italy: Sissa Medialab, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/1.047.0020.
Arkhipov, Alex, und Greg Kuperberg. „The bosonic birthday paradox“. In Low-dimensional manifolds and high-dimensional categories -- A conference in honor of Michael Hartley Freedman. Mathematical Sciences Publishers, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/gtm.2012.18.1.
„An Internet paradox (panel)“. In the 1998 ACM conference, Chair Sara Kiesler. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/289444.289515.
Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Paradox":
Marshak, Ronni. The CRM Paradox. Boston, MA: Patricia Seybold Group, Juni 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1571/psgp6-20-02cc.
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Weltgemeinschaften – ein Paradox. Saint John Publications, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.56154/pz.
Myers, Stewart, und Raghuram Rajan. The Paradox of Liquidity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Juni 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w5143.
Kochan, Thomas A. America's Human Capital Paradox. W.E. Upjohn Institute, März 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.17848/wp12-180.
Huo, Zhen, und José-Víctor Ríos-Rull. Paradox of Thrift Recessions. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w19443.
Blanchflower, David, und Alex Bryson. The Female Happiness Paradox. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, März 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w29893.
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. World Communities, a Paradox. Saint John Publications, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56154/th.
Woltering, Ernst J. Resolving the postharvestloss paradox. Wageningen: Wageningen University & Research, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/578159.
Leslie, Jean. Pandemic paradoxes and how they affect your workers. Center for Creative Leadership, Oktober 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35613/ccl.2021.2046.
Shoffner, Thomas A. Unconditional Surrender: A Modern Paradox. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, Januar 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada416069.