Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: OMOP common data model.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „OMOP common data model“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "OMOP common data model" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
1
Kang, Mengjia, Jose A. Alvarado-Guzman, Luke V. Rasmussen und Justin B. Starren. „Evolution of a Graph Model for the OMOP Common Data Model“. Applied Clinical Informatics 15, Nr. 05 (Oktober 2024): 1056–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791487.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Objective Graph databases for electronic health record (EHR) data have become a useful tool for clinical research in recent years, but there is a lack of published methods to transform relational databases to a graph database schema. We developed a graph model for the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM) that can be reused across research institutions. Methods We created and evaluated four models, representing two different strategies, for converting the standardized clinical and vocabulary tables of OMOP into a property graph model within the Neo4j graph database. Taking the Successful Clinical Response in Pneumonia Therapy (SCRIPT) and Collaborative Resource for Intensive care Translational science, Informatics, Comprehensive Analytics, and Learning (CRITICAL) cohorts as test datasets with different sizes, we compared two of the resulting graph models with respect to database performance including database building time, query complexity, and runtime for both cohorts. Results Utilizing a graph schema that was optimized for storing critical information as topology rather than attributes resulted in a significant improvement in both data creation and querying. The graph database for our larger cohort, CRITICAL, can be built within 1 hour for 134,145 patients, with a total of 749,011,396 nodes and 1,703,560,910 edges. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first generalized solution to convert the OMOP CDM to a graph-optimized schema. Despite being developed for studies at a single institution, the modeling method can be applied to other OMOP CDM v5.x databases. Our evaluation with the SCRIPT and CRITICAL cohorts and comparison between the current and previous versions show advantages in code simplicity, database building, and query speed. Conclusion We developed a method for converting OMOP CDM databases into graph databases. Our experiments revealed that the final model outperformed the initial relational-to-graph transformation in both code simplicity and query efficiency, particularly for complex queries.
2
Maier, Christian, Lorenz A. Kapsner, Sebastian Mate, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch und Stefan Kraus. „Patient Cohort Identification on Time Series Data Using the OMOP Common Data Model“. Applied Clinical Informatics 12, Nr. 01 (Januar 2021): 057–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721481.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Background The identification of patient cohorts for recruiting patients into clinical trials requires an evaluation of study-specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. These criteria are specified depending on corresponding clinical facts. Some of these facts may not be present in the clinical source systems and need to be calculated either in advance or at cohort query runtime (so-called feasibility query). Objectives We use the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) as the repository for our clinical data. However, Atlas, the graphical user interface of OMOP, does not offer the functionality to perform calculations on facts data. Therefore, we were in search for a different approach. The objective of this study is to investigate whether the Arden Syntax can be used for feasibility queries on the OMOP CDM to enable on-the-fly calculations at query runtime, to eliminate the need to precalculate data elements that are involved with researchers' criteria specification. Methods We implemented a service that reads the facts from the OMOP repository and provides it in a form which an Arden Syntax Medical Logic Module (MLM) can process. Then, we implemented an MLM that applies the eligibility criteria to every patient data set and outputs the list of eligible cases (i.e., performs the feasibility query). Results The study resulted in an MLM-based feasibility query that identifies cases of overventilation as an example of how an on-the-fly calculation can be realized. The algorithm is split into two MLMs to provide the reusability of the approach. Conclusion We found that MLMs are a suitable technology for feasibility queries on the OMOP CDM. Our method of performing on-the-fly calculations can be employed with any OMOP instance and without touching existing infrastructure like the Extract, Transform and Load pipeline. Therefore, we think that it is a well-suited method to perform on-the-fly calculations on OMOP.
3
Chechulina, Anna, Jasmin Carus, Philipp Breitfeld, Christopher Gundler, Hanna Hees, Raphael Twerenbold, Stefan Blankenberg, Frank Ückert und Sylvia Nürnberg. „Semi-Automated Mapping of German Study Data Concepts to an English Common Data Model“. Applied Sciences 13, Nr. 14 (13.07.2023): 8159. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app13148159.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The standardization of data from medical studies and hospital information systems to a common data model such as the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) model can help make large datasets available for analysis using artificial intelligence approaches. Commonly, automatic mapping without intervention from domain experts delivers poor results. Further challenges arise from the need for translation of non-English medical data. Here, we report the establishment of a mapping approach which automatically translates German data variable names into English and suggests OMOP concepts. The approach was set up using study data from the Hamburg City Health Study. It was evaluated against the current standard, refined, and tested on a separate dataset. Furthermore, different types of graphical user interfaces for the selection of suggested OMOP concepts were created and assessed. Compared to the current standard our approach performs slightly better. Its main advantage lies in the automatic processing of German phrases into English OMOP concept suggestions, operating without the need for human intervention. Challenges still lie in the adequate translation of nonstandard expressions, as well as in the resolution of abbreviations into long names.
4
Garneau, William, Benjamin Martin, Kelly Gebo, Paul Nagy, Johns Hopkins, Danielle Boyce, Michael Cook und Matthew Robinson. „76 Lessons learned during implementation of OMOP common data model across multiple health systems“. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 8, s1 (April 2024): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.77.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Adoption of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model promises to transform large-scale observational health research. However, there are diverse challenges for operationalizing OMOP in terms of interoperability and technical skills among coordinating centers throughout the US. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A team from the Critical Path Institute (C-Path) collaborated with the informatics team members at Johns Hopkins to provide technical support to participating sites as part of the Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) process linking existing concepts to OMOP concepts. Health systems met regularly via teleconference to review challenges and progress in ETL process. Sites were responsible for performing the local ETL process with assistance and securely provisioning de-identified data as part of the CURE ID program. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: More than twenty health systems participated in the CURE ID effort.Laboratory measures, basic demographics, disease diagnoses and problem list were more easily mapped to OMOP concepts by CURE ID partner institutions. Outcomes, social determinants of health, medical devices, and specific treatments were less easily characterized as part of the project. Concepts within the medical record presented very different technical challenges in terms of representation. There is a lack of standardization in OMOP implementation even among centers using the same electronic medical health record. Readiness to adopt OMOP varied across the institutions who participated. Health systems achieved variable level of coverage using OMOP medical concepts as part of the initiative. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Adoption of OMOP involves local stakeholder knowledge and implementation. Variable complexity of health concepts contributed to variable coverage. Documentation and support require extensive time and effort. Open-source software can be technically challenging. Interoperability of secure data systems presents unique problems.
5
Lamer, Antoine, Osama Abou-Arab, Alexandre Bourgeois, Adrien Parrot, Benjamin Popoff, Jean-Baptiste Beuscart, Benoît Tavernier und Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa. „Transforming Anesthesia Data Into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study“. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, Nr. 10 (29.10.2021): e29259. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29259.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background Electronic health records (EHRs, such as those created by an anesthesia management system) generate a large amount of data that can notably be reused for clinical audits and scientific research. The sharing of these data and tools is generally affected by the lack of system interoperability. To overcome these issues, Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) developed the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM) to standardize EHR data and promote large-scale observational and longitudinal research. Anesthesia data have not previously been mapped into the OMOP CDM. Objective The primary objective was to transform anesthesia data into the OMOP CDM. The secondary objective was to provide vocabularies, queries, and dashboards that might promote the exploitation and sharing of anesthesia data through the CDM. Methods Using our local anesthesia data warehouse, a group of 5 experts from 5 different medical centers identified local concepts related to anesthesia. The concepts were then matched with standard concepts in the OHDSI vocabularies. We performed structural mapping between the design of our local anesthesia data warehouse and the OMOP CDM tables and fields. To validate the implementation of anesthesia data into the OMOP CDM, we developed a set of queries and dashboards. Results We identified 522 concepts related to anesthesia care. They were classified as demographics, units, measurements, operating room steps, drugs, periods of interest, and features. After semantic mapping, 353 (67.7%) of these anesthesia concepts were mapped to OHDSI concepts. Further, 169 (32.3%) concepts related to periods and features were added to the OHDSI vocabularies. Then, 8 OMOP CDM tables were implemented with anesthesia data and 2 new tables (EPISODE and FEATURE) were added to store secondarily computed data. We integrated data from 5,72,609 operations and provided the code for a set of 8 queries and 4 dashboards related to anesthesia care. Conclusions Generic data concerning demographics, drugs, units, measurements, and operating room steps were already available in OHDSI vocabularies. However, most of the intraoperative concepts (the duration of specific steps, an episode of hypotension, etc) were not present in OHDSI vocabularies. The OMOP mapping provided here enables anesthesia data reuse.
6
Ward, Roger, Christine Mary Hallinan, David Ormiston-Smith, Christine Chidgey und Dougie Boyle. „The OMOP common data model in Australian primary care data: Building a quality research ready harmonised dataset“. PLOS ONE 19, Nr. 4 (18.04.2024): e0301557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301557.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background The use of routinely collected health data for secondary research purposes is increasingly recognised as a methodology that advances medical research, improves patient outcomes, and guides policy. This secondary data, as found in electronic medical records (EMRs), can be optimised through conversion into a uniform data structure to enable analysis alongside other comparable health metric datasets. This can be achieved with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM), which employs a standardised vocabulary to facilitate systematic analysis across various observational databases. The concept behind the OMOP-CDM is the conversion of data into a common format through the harmonisation of terminologies, vocabularies, and coding schemes within a unique repository. The OMOP model enhances research capacity through the development of shared analytic and prediction techniques; pharmacovigilance for the active surveillance of drug safety; and ‘validation’ analyses across multiple institutions across Australia, the United States, Europe, and the Asia Pacific. In this research, we aim to investigate the use of the open-source OMOP-CDM in the PATRON primary care data repository. Methods We used standard structured query language (SQL) to construct, extract, transform, and load scripts to convert the data to the OMOP-CDM. The process of mapping distinct free-text terms extracted from various EMRs presented a substantial challenge, as many terms could not be automatically matched to standard vocabularies through direct text comparison. This resulted in a number of terms that required manual assignment. To address this issue, we implemented a strategy where our clinical mappers were instructed to focus only on terms that appeared with sufficient frequency. We established a specific threshold value for each domain, ensuring that more than 95% of all records were linked to an approved vocabulary like SNOMED once appropriate mapping was completed. To assess the data quality of the resultant OMOP dataset we utilised the OHDSI Data Quality Dashboard (DQD) to evaluate the plausibility, conformity, and comprehensiveness of the data in the PATRON repository according to the Kahn framework. Results Across three primary care EMR systems we converted data on 2.03 million active patients to version 5.4 of the OMOP common data model. The DQD assessment involved a total of 3,570 individual evaluations. Each evaluation compared the outcome against a predefined threshold. A ’FAIL’ occurred when the percentage of non-compliant rows exceeded the specified threshold value. In this assessment of the primary care OMOP database described here, we achieved an overall pass rate of 97%. Conclusion The OMOP CDM’s widespread international use, support, and training provides a well-established pathway for data standardisation in collaborative research. Its compatibility allows the sharing of analysis packages across local and international research groups, which facilitates rapid and reproducible data comparisons. A suite of open-source tools, including the OHDSI Data Quality Dashboard (Version 1.4.1), supports the model. Its simplicity and standards-based approach facilitates adoption and integration into existing data processes.
7
Lamer, Antoine, Nicolas Depas, Matthieu Doutreligne, Adrien Parrot, David Verloop, Marguerite-Marie Defebvre, Grégoire Ficheur, Emmanuel Chazard und Jean-Baptiste Beuscart. „Transforming French Electronic Health Records into the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership's Common Data Model: A Feasibility Study“. Applied Clinical Informatics 11, Nr. 01 (Januar 2020): 013–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402754.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Background Common data models (CDMs) enable data to be standardized, and facilitate data exchange, sharing, and storage, particularly when the data have been collected via distinct, heterogeneous systems. Moreover, CDMs provide tools for data quality assessment, integration into models, visualization, and analysis. The observational medical outcome partnership (OMOP) provides a CDM for organizing and standardizing databases. Common data models not only facilitate data integration but also (and especially for the OMOP model) extends the range of available statistical analyses. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing French national electronic health records in the OMOP CDM. Methods The OMOP's specifications were used to audit the source data, specify the transformation into the OMOP CDM, implement an extract–transform–load process to feed data from the French health care system into the OMOP CDM, and evaluate the final database. Results Seventeen vocabularies corresponding to the French context were added to the OMOP CDM's concepts. Three French terminologies were automatically mapped to standardized vocabularies. We loaded nine tables from the OMOP CDM's “standardized clinical data” section, and three tables from the “standardized health system data” section. Outpatient and inpatient data from 38,730 individuals were integrated. The median (interquartile range) number of outpatient and inpatient stays per patient was 160 (19–364). Conclusion Our results demonstrated that data from the French national health care system can be integrated into the OMOP CDM. One of the main challenges was the use of international OMOP concepts to annotate data recorded in a French context. The use of local terminologies was an obstacle to conceptual mapping; with the exception of an adaptation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision, the French health care system does not use international terminologies. It would be interesting to extend our present findings to the 65 million people registered in the French health care system.
8
Lee, Geun Hyeong, Jonggul Park, Jihyeong Kim, Yeesuk Kim, Byungjin Choi, Rae Woong Park, Sang Youl Rhee und Soo-Yong Shin. „Feasibility Study of Federated Learning on the Distributed Research Network of OMOP Common Data Model“. Healthcare Informatics Research 29, Nr. 2 (30.04.2023): 168–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.2.168.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Objectives: Since protecting patients’ privacy is a major concern in clinical research, there has been a growing need for privacy-preserving data analysis platforms. For this purpose, a federated learning (FL) method based on the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM) was implemented, and its feasibility was demonstrated.Methods: We implemented an FL platform on FeederNet, which is a distributed clinical data analysis platform based on the OMOP CDM in Korea. We trained it through an artificial neural network (ANN) using data from patients who received steroid prescriptions or injections, with the aim of predicting the occurrence of side effects depending on the prescribed dose. The ANN was trained using the FL platform with the OMOP CDMs of Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KHMC) and Ajou University Hospital (AUH).Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for predicting bone fracture, osteonecrosis, and osteoporosis using only data from each hospital were 0.8426, 0.6920, and 0.7727 for KHMC and 0.7891, 0.7049, and 0.7544 for AUH, respectively. In contrast, when using FL, the corresponding AUROCs were 0.8260, 0.7001, and 0.7928 for KHMC and 0.7912, 0.8076, and 0.7441 for AUH, respectively. In particular, FL led to a 14% improvement in performance for osteonecrosis at AUH.Conclusions: FL can be performed with the OMOP CDM, and FL often shows better performance than using only a single institution's data. Therefore, research using OMOP CDM has been expanded from statistical analysis to machine learning so that researchers can conduct more diverse research.
9
Hallinan, Christine Mary, Roger Ward, Graeme K. Hart, Clair Sullivan, Nicole Pratt, Ashley P. Ng, Daniel Capurro et al. „Seamless EMR data access: Integrated governance, digital health and the OMOP-CDM“. BMJ Health & Care Informatics 31, Nr. 1 (Februar 2024): e100953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100953.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
ObjectivesIn this overview, we describe theObservational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM), the established governance processes employed in EMR data repositories, and demonstrate how OMOP transformed data provides a lever for more efficient and secure access to electronic medical record (EMR) data by health service providers and researchers.MethodsThrough pseudonymisation and common data quality assessments, the OMOP-CDM provides a robust framework for converting complex EMR data into a standardised format. This allows for the creation of shared end-to-end analysis packages without the need for direct data exchange, thereby enhancing data security and privacy. By securely sharing de-identified and aggregated data and conducting analyses across multiple OMOP-converted databases, patient-level data is securely firewalled within its respective local site.ResultsBy simplifying data management processes and governance, and through the promotion of interoperability, the OMOP-CDM supports a wide range of clinical, epidemiological, and translational research projects, as well as health service operational reporting.DiscussionAdoption of the OMOP-CDM internationally and locally enables conversion of vast amounts of complex, and heterogeneous EMR data into a standardised structured data model, simplifies governance processes, and facilitates rapid repeatable cross-institution analysis through shared end-to-end analysis packages, without the sharing of data.ConclusionThe adoption of the OMOP-CDM has the potential to transform health data analytics by providing a common platform for analysing EMR data across diverse healthcare settings.
10
Bardenheuer, Kristina, Alun Passey, Maria d'Errico, Barbara Millier, Carine Guinard-Azadian, Johan Aschan und Michel van Speybroeck. „Honeur (Heamatology Outcomes Network in Europe): A Federated Model to Support Real World Data Research in Hematology“. Blood 132, Supplement 1 (29.11.2018): 4839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-111093.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Introduction: The Haematology Outcomes Network in EURope (HONEUR) is an interdisciplinary initiative aimed at improving patient outcomes by analyzing real world data across hematological centers in Europe. Its overarching goal is to create a secure network which facilitates the development of a collaborative research community and allows access to big data tools for analysis of the data. The central paradigm in the HONEUR network is a federated model whereby the data stays at the respective sites and the analysis is executed at the local data sources. To allow for a uniform data analysis, the common data model 'OMOP' (Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership) was selected and extended to accommodate specific hematology data elements. Objective: To demonstrate feasibility of the OMOP common data model for the HONEUR network. Methods: In order to validate the architecture of the HONEUR network and the applicability of the OMOP common data model, data from the EMMOS registry (NCT01241396) have been used. This registry is a prospective, non-interventional study that was designed to capture real world data regarding treatments and outcomes for multiple myeloma at different stages of the disease. Data was collected between Oct 2010 and Nov 2014 on more than 2,400 patients across 266 sites in 22 countries. Data was mapped to the OMOP common data model version 5.3. Additional new concepts to the standard OMOP were provided to preserve the semantic mapping quality and reduce the potential loss of granularity. Following the mapping process, a quality analysis was performed to assess the completeness and accuracy of the mapping to the common data model. Specific critical concepts in multiple myeloma needed to be represented in OMOP. This applies in particular for concepts like treatment lines, cytogenetic observations, disease progression, risk scales (in particular ISS and R-ISS). To accommodate these concepts, existing OMOP structures were used with the definition of new concepts and concept-relationships. Results: Several elements of mapping data from the EMMOS registry to the OMOP common data model (CDM) were evaluated via integrity checks. Core entities from the OMOP CDM were reconciled against the source data. This was applied for the following entities: person (profile of year of birth and gender), drug exposure (profile of number of drug exposures per drug, at ATC code level), conditions (profile of number of occurrences of conditions per condition code, converted to SNOMED), measurement (profile of number of measurements and value distribution per (lab) measurement, converted to LOINC) and observation (profile of number of observations per observation concept). Figure 1 shows the histogram of year of birth distribution between the EMMOS registry and the OMOP CDM. No discernible differences exist, except for subjects which have not been included in the mapping to the OMOP CDM due to lacking confirmation of a diagnosis of multiple myeloma. As additional part of the architecture validation, the occurrence of the top 20 medications in the EMMOS registry and the OMOP CDM were compared, with a 100% concordance for the drug codes, which is shown in Figure 2. In addition to the reconciliation against the different OMOP entities, a comparison was also made against 'derived' data, in particular 'time to event' analysis. Overall survival was plotted from calculated variables in the analysis level data from the EMMOS registry and derived variables in the OMOP CDM. Probability of overall survival over time was virtually identical with only one day difference in median survival and 95% confidence intervals identically overlapping over the period of measurement (Figure 3). Conclusions: The concordance of year of birth, drug code mapping and overall survival between the EMMOS registry and the OMOP common data model indicates the reliability of mapping potential in HONEUR, especially where auxiliary methods have been developed to handle outcomes and treatment data in a way that can be harmonized across platform datasets. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
11
Paris, Nicolas, Antoine Lamer und Adrien Parrot. „Transformation and Evaluation of the MIMIC Database in the OMOP Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study“. JMIR Medical Informatics 9, Nr. 12 (14.12.2021): e30970. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30970.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background In the era of big data, the intensive care unit (ICU) is likely to benefit from real-time computer analysis and modeling based on close patient monitoring and electronic health record data. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) is the first open access database in the ICU domain. Many studies have shown that common data models (CDMs) improve database searching by allowing code, tools, and experience to be shared. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM is spreading all over the world. Objective The objective was to transform MIMIC into an OMOP database and to evaluate the benefits of this transformation for analysts. Methods We transformed MIMIC (version 1.4.21) into OMOP format (version 5.3.3.1) through semantic and structural mapping. The structural mapping aimed at moving the MIMIC data into the right place in OMOP, with some data transformations. The mapping was divided into 3 phases: conception, implementation, and evaluation. The conceptual mapping aimed at aligning the MIMIC local terminologies to OMOP's standard ones. It consisted of 3 phases: integration, alignment, and evaluation. A documented, tested, versioned, exemplified, and open repository was set up to support the transformation and improvement of the MIMIC community's source code. The resulting data set was evaluated over a 48-hour datathon. Results With an investment of 2 people for 500 hours, 64% of the data items of the 26 MIMIC tables were standardized into the OMOP CDM and 78% of the source concepts mapped to reference terminologies. The model proved its ability to support community contributions and was well received during the datathon, with 160 participants and 15,000 requests executed with a maximum duration of 1 minute. Conclusions The resulting MIMIC-OMOP data set is the first MIMIC-OMOP data set available free of charge with real disidentified data ready for replicable intensive care research. This approach can be generalized to any medical field.
12
Paris, Nicolas, Antoine Lamer und Adrien Parrot. „Transformation and Evaluation of the MIMIC Database in the OMOP Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study“. JMIR Medical Informatics 9, Nr. 12 (14.12.2021): e30970. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30970.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background In the era of big data, the intensive care unit (ICU) is likely to benefit from real-time computer analysis and modeling based on close patient monitoring and electronic health record data. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) is the first open access database in the ICU domain. Many studies have shown that common data models (CDMs) improve database searching by allowing code, tools, and experience to be shared. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM is spreading all over the world. Objective The objective was to transform MIMIC into an OMOP database and to evaluate the benefits of this transformation for analysts. Methods We transformed MIMIC (version 1.4.21) into OMOP format (version 5.3.3.1) through semantic and structural mapping. The structural mapping aimed at moving the MIMIC data into the right place in OMOP, with some data transformations. The mapping was divided into 3 phases: conception, implementation, and evaluation. The conceptual mapping aimed at aligning the MIMIC local terminologies to OMOP's standard ones. It consisted of 3 phases: integration, alignment, and evaluation. A documented, tested, versioned, exemplified, and open repository was set up to support the transformation and improvement of the MIMIC community's source code. The resulting data set was evaluated over a 48-hour datathon. Results With an investment of 2 people for 500 hours, 64% of the data items of the 26 MIMIC tables were standardized into the OMOP CDM and 78% of the source concepts mapped to reference terminologies. The model proved its ability to support community contributions and was well received during the datathon, with 160 participants and 15,000 requests executed with a maximum duration of 1 minute. Conclusions The resulting MIMIC-OMOP data set is the first MIMIC-OMOP data set available free of charge with real disidentified data ready for replicable intensive care research. This approach can be generalized to any medical field.
13
Kent, Seamus, und Jacoline Bouvy. „PP385 Using Common Data Models And Data Networks For Evidence Generation In Health Technology Assessment“. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 36, S1 (Dezember 2020): 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462320001683.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
IntroductionDifferences between healthcare datasets in structure, content, and coding systems are widely recognized as significant barriers to generating robust evidence for regulatory and medical decision making. As a result, there is a growing interest in using common data models embedded within large data networks. By standardizing the structure, contents, and semantics of disparate healthcare databases, common data models like the Observational and Medical Outcomes Partnerships common data model (OMOP-CDM) enable multidatabase studies to be undertaken at speed and in a transparent way. To date, little attention has been given to their potential role in health technology assessment (HTA).MethodsWe identify the uses of observational data in generating evidence in HTA, some common analytical challenges faced in their estimation, and the infrastructural, technical, and data reusability constraints that limit its wider use. We discuss where and how the OMOP-CDM could overcome these barriers in relation to different types of evidence requirements.ResultsThe OMOP-CDM increases the interoperability of otherwise disparate datasets, allowing reliable evidence to be generated from multidatabase studies at speed and transparently. The current analytical tools are best suited for clinical characterization and population-level effect estimation. Further developments to these tools are required to support analyses common in HTA like parametric survival modeling. Differences in costing methods as well as the structure of healthcare delivery between countries may limit the feasibility and value of standardization.ConclusionsThe OMOP-CDM has the potential to support reliable and timely evidence generation in HTA. The analytical tools should be further developed to support common HTA use cases.
14
Yoo, Sooyoung, Eunsil Yoon, Dachung Boo, Borham Kim, Seok Kim, Jin Chul Paeng, Ie Ryung Yoo et al. „Transforming Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Staging Information from Unstructured Reports to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership Common Data Model“. Applied Clinical Informatics 13, Nr. 03 (Mai 2022): 521–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748144.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Background Cancer staging information is an essential component of cancer research. However, the information is primarily stored as either a full or semistructured free-text clinical document which is limiting the data use. By transforming the cancer-specific data to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM), the information can contribute to establish multicenter observational cancer studies. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies on OMOP CDM transformation and natural language processing (NLP) for thyroid cancer to date. Objective We aimed to demonstrate the applicability of the OMOP CDM oncology extension module for thyroid cancer diagnosis and cancer stage information by processing free-text medical reports. Methods Thyroid cancer diagnosis and stage-related modifiers were extracted with rule-based NLP from 63,795 thyroid cancer pathology reports and 56,239 Iodine whole-body scan reports from three medical institutions in the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics data network. The data were converted into the OMOP CDM v6.0 according to the OMOP CDM oncology extension module. The cancer staging group was derived and populated using the transformed CDM data. Results The extracted thyroid cancer data were completely converted into the OMOP CDM. The distributions of histopathological types of thyroid cancer were approximately 95.3 to 98.8% of papillary carcinoma, 0.9 to 3.7% of follicular carcinoma, 0.04 to 0.54% of adenocarcinoma, 0.17 to 0.81% of medullary carcinoma, and 0 to 0.3% of anaplastic carcinoma. Regarding cancer staging, stage-I thyroid cancer accounted for 55 to 64% of the cases, while stage III accounted for 24 to 26% of the cases. Stage-II and -IV thyroid cancers were detected at a low rate of 2 to 6%. Conclusion As a first study on OMOP CDM transformation and NLP for thyroid cancer, this study will help other institutions to standardize thyroid cancer–specific data for retrospective observational research and participate in multicenter studies.
15
Sibert, Nora Tabea, Johannes Soff, Sebastiano La Ferla, Maria Quaranta, Andreas Kremer und Christoph Kowalski. „Transforming a Large-Scale Prostate Cancer Outcomes Dataset to the OMOP Common Data Model—Experiences from a Scientific Data Holder’s Perspective“. Cancers 16, Nr. 11 (30.05.2024): 2069. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112069.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
To enhance international and joint research collaborations in prostate cancer research, data from different sources should use a common data model (CDM) that enables researchers to share their analysis scripts and merge results. The OMOP CDM maintained by OHDSI is such a data model developed for a federated data analysis with partners from different institutions that want to jointly investigate research questions using clinical care data. The German Cancer Society as the scientific lead of the Prostate Cancer Outcomes (PCO) study gathers data from prostate cancer care including routine oncological care data and survey data (incl. patient-reported outcomes) and uses a common data specification (called OncoBox Research Prostate) for this purpose. To further enhance research collaborations outside the PCO study, the purpose of this article is to describe the process of transferring the PCO study data to the internationally well-established OMOP CDM. This process was carried out together with an IT company that specialised in supporting research institutions to transfer their data to OMOP CDM. Of n = 49,692 prostate cancer cases with 318 data fields each, n = 392 had to be excluded during the OMOPing process, and n = 247 of the data fields could be mapped to OMOP CDM. The resulting PostgreSQL database with OMOPed PCO study data is now ready to use within larger research collaborations such as the EU-funded EHDEN and OPTIMA consortium.
16
Carus, Jasmin, Leona Trübe, Philip Szczepanski, Sylvia Nürnberg, Hanna Hees, Stefan Bartels, Alice Nennecke, Frank Ückert und Christopher Gundler. „Mapping the Oncological Basis Dataset to the Standardized Vocabularies of a Common Data Model: A Feasibility Study“. Cancers 15, Nr. 16 (11.08.2023): 4059. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164059.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
In their joint effort against cancer, all involved parties within the German healthcare system are obligated to report diagnostics, treatments, progression, and follow-up information for tumor patients to the respective cancer registries. Given the federal structure of Germany, the oncological basis dataset (oBDS) operates as the legally required national standard for oncological reporting. Unfortunately, the usage of various documentation software solutions leads to semantic and technical heterogeneity of the data, complicating the establishment of research networks and collective data analysis. Within this feasibility study, we evaluated the transferability of all oBDS characteristics to the standardized vocabularies, a metadata repository of the observational medical outcomes partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM). A total of 17,844 oBDS expressions were mapped automatically or manually to standardized concepts of the OMOP CDM. In a second step, we converted real patient data retrieved from the Hamburg Cancer Registry to the new terminologies. Given our pipeline, we transformed 1773.373 cancer-related data elements to the OMOP CDM. The mapping of the oBDS to the standardized vocabularies of the OMOP CDM promotes the semantic interoperability of oncological data in Germany. Moreover, it allows the participation in network studies of the observational health data sciences and informatics under the usage of federated analysis beyond the level of individual countries.
17
Tan, Hui Xing, Desmond Chun Hwee Teo, Dongyun Lee, Chungsoo Kim, Jing Wei Neo, Cynthia Sung, Haroun Chahed et al. „Applying the OMOP Common Data Model to Facilitate Benefit-Risk Assessments of Medicinal Products Using Real-World Data from Singapore and South Korea“. Healthcare Informatics Research 28, Nr. 2 (30.04.2022): 112–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2022.28.2.112.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize the benefits of converting Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) to a common data model (CDM) and to assess the potential of CDM-converted data to rapidly generate insights for benefit-risk assessments in post-market regulatory evaluation and decisions.Methods: EMRs from January 2013 to December 2016 were mapped onto the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-CDM (OMOP-CDM) schema. Vocabulary mappings were applied to convert source data values into OMOP-CDM-endorsed terminologies. Existing analytic codes used in a prior OMOP-CDM drug utilization study were modified to conduct an illustrative analysis of oral anticoagulants used for atrial fibrillation in Singapore and South Korea, resembling a typical benefit-risk assessment. A novel visualization is proposed to represent the comparative effectiveness, safety and utilization of the drugs.Results: Over 90% of records were mapped onto the OMOP-CDM. The CDM data structures and analytic code templates simplified the querying of data for the analysis. In total, 2,419 patients from Singapore and South Korea fulfilled the study criteria, the majority of whom were warfarin users. After 3 months of follow-up, differences in cumulative incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events were observable via the proposed visualization, surfacing insights as to the agent of preference in a given clinical setting, which may meaningfully inform regulatory decision-making.Conclusions: While the structure of the OMOP-CDM and its accessory tools facilitate real-world data analysis, extending them to fulfil regulatory analytic purposes in the post-market setting, such as benefit-risk assessments, may require layering on additional analytic tools and visualization techniques.
18
Jung, Hyesil, Sooyoung Yoo, Seok Kim, Eunjeong Heo, Borham Kim, Ho-Young Lee und Hee Hwang. „Patient-Level Fall Risk Prediction Using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership’s Common Data Model: Pilot Feasibility Study“. JMIR Medical Informatics 10, Nr. 3 (11.03.2022): e35104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35104.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background Falls in acute care settings threaten patients’ safety. Researchers have been developing fall risk prediction models and exploring risk factors to provide evidence-based fall prevention practices; however, such efforts are hindered by insufficient samples, limited covariates, and a lack of standardized methodologies that aid study replication. Objective The objectives of this study were to (1) convert fall-related electronic health record data into the standardized Observational Medical Outcome Partnership's (OMOP) common data model format and (2) develop models that predict fall risk during 2 time periods. Methods As a pilot feasibility test, we converted fall-related electronic health record data (nursing notes, fall risk assessment sheet, patient acuity assessment sheet, and clinical observation sheet) into standardized OMOP common data model format using an extraction, transformation, and load process. We developed fall risk prediction models for 2 time periods (within 7 days of admission and during the entire hospital stay) using 2 algorithms (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression and random forest). Results In total, 6277 nursing statements, 747,049,486 clinical observation sheet records, 1,554,775 fall risk scores, and 5,685,011 patient acuity scores were converted into OMOP common data model format. All our models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.692-0.726) performed better than the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model. Patient acuity score, fall history, age ≥60 years, movement disorder, and central nervous system agents were the most important predictors in the logistic regression models. Conclusions To enhance model performance further, we are currently converting all nursing records into the OMOP common data model data format, which will then be included in the models. Thus, in the near future, the performance of fall risk prediction models could be improved through the application of abundant nursing records and external validation.
19
Finster, Melissa, Maxim Moinat und Elham Taghizadeh. „ETL: From the German Health Data Lab data formats to the OMOP Common Data Model“. PLOS ONE 20, Nr. 1 (06.01.2025): e0311511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311511.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Objective The German Health Data Lab is going to provide access to German statutory health insurance claims data ranging from 2009 to the present for research purposes. Due to evolving data formats within the German Health Data Lab, there is a need to standardize this data into a Common Data Model to facilitate collaborative health research and minimize the need for researchers to adapt to multiple data formats. For this purpose we selected transforming the data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model. Methods We developed an Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) pipeline for two distinct German Health Data Lab data formats: Format 1 (2009-2016) and Format 3 (2019 onwards). Due to the identical format structure of Format 1 and Format 2 (2017 -2018), the ETL pipeline of Format 1 can be applied on Format 2 as well. Our ETL process, supported by Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics tools, includes specification development, SQL skeleton creation, and concept mapping. We detail the process characteristics and present a quality assessment that includes field coverage and concept mapping accuracy using example data. Results For Format 1, we achieved a field coverage of 92.7%. The Data Quality Dashboard showed 100.0% conformance and 80.6% completeness, although plausibility checks were disabled. The mapping coverage for the Condition domain was low at 18.3% due to invalid codes and missing mappings in the provided example data. For Format 3, the field coverage was 86.2%, with Data Quality Dashboard reporting 99.3% conformance and 75.9% completeness. The Procedure domain had very low mapping coverage (2.2%) due to the use of mocked data and unmapped local concepts The Condition domain results with 99.8% of unique codes mapped. The absence of real data limits the comprehensive assessment of quality. Conclusion The ETL process effectively transforms the data with high field coverage and conformance. It simplifies data utilization for German Health Data Lab users and enhances the use of OHDSI analysis tools. This initiative represents a significant step towards facilitating cross-border research in Europe by providing publicly available, standardized ETL processes (https://github.com/FraunhoferMEVIS/ETLfromHDLtoOMOP) and evaluations of their performance.
20
Resnic, F. S., S. L. Robbins, J. Denton, L. Nookala, D. Meeker, L. Ohno-Machado, M. E. Matheny und F. FitzHenry. „Creating a Common Data Model for Comparative Effectiveness with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership“. Applied Clinical Informatics 06, Nr. 03 (2015): 536–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/aci-2014-12-cr-0121.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
SummaryBackground: Adoption of a common data model across health systems is a key infrastructure requirement to allow large scale distributed comparative effectiveness analyses. There are a growing number of common data models (CDM), such as Mini-Sentinel, and the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDMs.Objective: In this case study, we describe the challenges and opportunities of a study specific use of the OMOP CDM by two health systems and describe three comparative effectiveness use cases developed from the CDM.Methods: The project transformed two health system databases (using crosswalks provided) into the OMOP CDM. Cohorts were developed from the transformed CDMs for three comparative effectiveness use case examples. Administrative/billing, demographic, order history, medication, and laboratory were included in the CDM transformation and cohort development rules.Results: Record counts per person month are presented for the eligible cohorts, highlighting differences between the civilian and federal datasets, e.g. the federal data set had more outpatient visits per person month (6.44 vs. 2.05 per person month). The count of medications per person month reflected the fact that one system‘s medications were extracted from orders while the other system had pharmacy fills and medication administration records. The federal system also had a higher prevalence of the conditions in all three use cases. Both systems required manual coding of some types of data to convert to the CDM.Conclusion: The data transformation to the CDM was time consuming and resources required were substantial, beyond requirements for collecting native source data. The need to manually code subsets of data limited the conversion. However, once the native data was converted to the CDM, both systems were then able to use the same queries to identify cohorts. Thus, the CDM minimized the effort to develop cohorts and analyze the results across the sites.FitzHenry F, Resnic FS, Robbins SL, Denton J, Nookala L, Meeker D, Ohno-Machado L, Matheny ME. A Case Report on Creating a Common Data Model for Comparative Effectiveness with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6: 536–547http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-12-CR-0121
21
Ahmadi, Najia, Yuan Peng, Markus Wolfien, Michéle Zoch und Martin Sedlmayr. „OMOP CDM Can Facilitate Data-Driven Studies for Cancer Prediction: A Systematic Review“. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, Nr. 19 (05.10.2022): 11834. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911834.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The current generation of sequencing technologies has led to significant advances in identifying novel disease-associated mutations and generated large amounts of data in a high-throughput manner. Such data in conjunction with clinical routine data are proven to be highly useful in deriving population-level and patient-level predictions, especially in the field of cancer precision medicine. However, data harmonization across multiple national and international clinical sites is an essential step for the assessment of events and outcomes associated with patients, which is currently not adequately addressed. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) is an internationally established research data repository introduced by the Observational Health Data Science and Informatics (OHDSI) community to overcome this issue. To address the needs of cancer research, the genomic vocabulary extension was introduced in 2020 to support the standardization of subsequent data analysis. In this review, we evaluate the current potential of the OMOP CDM to be applicable in cancer prediction and how comprehensively the genomic vocabulary extension of the OMOP can serve current needs of AI-based predictions. For this, we systematically screened the literature for articles that use the OMOP CDM in predictive analyses in cancer and investigated the underlying predictive models/tools. Interestingly, we found 248 articles, of which most use the OMOP for harmonizing their data, but only 5 make use of predictive algorithms on OMOP-based data and fulfill our criteria. The studies present multicentric investigations, in which the OMOP played an essential role in discovering and optimizing machine learning (ML)-based models. Ultimately, the use of the OMOP CDM leads to standardized data-driven studies for multiple clinical sites and enables a more solid basis utilizing, e.g., ML models that can be reused and combined in early prediction, diagnosis, and improvement of personalized cancer care and biomarker discovery.
22
Quiroz, Juan C., Tim Chard, Zhisheng Sa, Angus Ritchie, Louisa Jorm und Blanca Gallego. „Extract, transform, load framework for the conversion of health databases to OMOP“. PLOS ONE 17, Nr. 4 (11.04.2022): e0266911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266911.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Common data models standardize the structures and semantics of health datasets, enabling reproducibility and large-scale studies that leverage the data from multiple locations and settings. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM) is one of the leading common data models. While there is a strong incentive to convert datasets to OMOP, the conversion is time and resource-intensive, leaving the research community in need of tools for mapping data to OMOP. We propose an extract, transform, load (ETL) framework that is metadata-driven and generic across source datasets. The ETL framework uses a new data manipulation language (DML) that organizes SQL snippets in YAML. Our framework includes a compiler that converts YAML files with mapping logic into an ETL script. Access to the ETL framework is available via a web application, allowing users to upload and edit YAML files via web editor and obtain an ETL SQL script for use in development environments. The structure of the DML maximizes readability, refactoring, and maintainability, while minimizing technical debt and standardizing the writing of ETL operations for mapping to OMOP. Our framework also supports transparency of the mapping process and reuse by different institutions.
23
Sathappan, Selva Muthu Kumaran, Young Seok Jeon, Trung Kien Dang, Su Chi Lim, Yi-Ming Shao, E. Shyong Tai und Mengling Feng. „Transformation of Electronic Health Records and Questionnaire Data to OMOP CDM: A Feasibility Study Using SG_T2DM Dataset“. Applied Clinical Informatics 12, Nr. 04 (August 2021): 757–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732301.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important public health concern in Singapore and places a massive burden on health care spending. Tackling chronic diseases such as DM requires innovative strategies to integrate patients' data from diverse sources and use scientific discovery to inform clinical practice that can help better manage the disease. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) was chosen as the framework for integrating data with disparate formats. Objective The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of converting Singapore based data source, comprising of electronic health records (EHR), cognitive and depression assessment questionnaire data to OMOP CDM standard. Additionally, we also validate whether our OMOP CDM instance is fit for the purpose of research by executing a simple treatment pathways study using Atlas, a graphical user interface tool to conduct analysis on OMOP CDM data as a proof of concept. Methods We used de-identified EHR, cognitive, and depression assessment questionnaires data from a tertiary care hospital in Singapore to convert it to version 5.3.1 of OMOP CDM standard. We evaluate the OMOP CDM conversion by (1) assessing the mapping coverage (that is the percentage of source terms mapped to OMOP CDM standard); (2) local raw dataset versus CDM dataset analysis; and (3) Implementing Harmonized Intrinsic Data Quality Framework using an open-source R package called Data Quality Dashboard. Results The content coverage of OMOP CDM vocabularies is more than 90% for clinical data, but only around 11% for questionnaire data. The comparison of characteristics between source and target data returned consistent results and our transformed data did not pass 38 (1.4%) out of 2,622 quality checks. Conclusion Adoption of OMOP CDM at our site demonstrated that EHR data are feasible for standardization with minimal information loss, whereas challenges remain for standardizing cognitive and depression assessment questionnaire data that requires further work.
24
Makadia, Rupa, und Patrick B. Ryan. „Transforming the Premier Perspective® hospital database to the OMOP Common Data Model“. eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes) 2, Nr. 1 (11.11.2014): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1110.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
25
Park, Kangah, Minsu Cho, Minseok Song, Sooyoung Yoo, Hyunyoung Baek, Seok Kim und Kidong Kim. „Exploring the potential of OMOP common data model for process mining in healthcare“. PLOS ONE 18, Nr. 1 (03.01.2023): e0279641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279641.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background and objective Recently, Electronic Health Records (EHR) are increasingly being converted to Common Data Models (CDMs), a database schema designed to provide standardized vocabularies to facilitate collaborative observational research. To date, however, rare attempts exist to leverage CDM data for healthcare process mining, a technique to derive process-related knowledge (e.g., process model) from event logs. This paper presents a method to extract, construct, and analyze event logs from the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM for process mining and demonstrates CDM-based healthcare process mining with several real-life study cases while answering frequently posed questions in process mining, in the CDM environment. Methods We propose a method to extract, construct, and analyze event logs from the OMOP CDM for process types including inpatient, outpatient, emergency room processes, and patient journey. Using the proposed method, we extract the retrospective data of several surgical procedure cases (i.e., Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH), Total Hip Replacement (THR), Coronary Bypass (CB), Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)) from the CDM of a Korean tertiary hospital. Patient data are extracted for each of the operations and analyzed using several process mining techniques. Results Using process mining, the clinical pathways, outpatient process models, emergency room process models, and patient journeys are demonstrated using the extracted logs. The result shows CDM’s usability as a novel and valuable data source for healthcare process analysis, yet with a few considerations. We found that CDM should be complemented by different internal and external data sources to address the administrative and operational aspects of healthcare processes, particularly for outpatient and ER process analyses. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to exploit CDM for healthcare process mining. Specifically, we provide a step-by-step guidance by demonstrating process analysis from locating relevant CDM tables to visualizing results using process mining tools. The proposed method can be widely applicable across different institutions. This work can contribute to bringing a process mining perspective to the existing CDM users in the changing Hospital Information Systems (HIS) environment and also to facilitating CDM-based studies in the process mining research community.
26
Oliveira, J. C. B., G. S. Julian und J. M. Maruyama. „PT7 Data Standardization in Brazil: An OMOP Common Data Model Approach in a DATASUS Cohort“. Value in Health 26, Nr. 12 (Dezember 2023): S539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.09.2899.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
27
Moon, Hee-kyung, Sung-kook Han und Chang-ho An. „LOD Development System for Medical Information Standard“. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, Nr. 3.33 (29.08.2018): 225. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.33.21018.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper describes Linked Open Data(LOD) development system and its application of medical information standard as Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership(OMOP) Common Data Model(CDM). The OMOP CDM allows for the systematic analysis of disparate observational database in each hospital. This paper describes a LOD instance development system based on SII. It can generate the application-specified instance development system automatically. Therefore, we applied by medical information standard as OMOP CDM to LOD development system. As a result, it was confirmed that there is no problem in applying to the standardization of medical information using the LOD development system.
28
Klann, Jeffrey G., Matthew A. H. Joss, Kevin Embree und Shawn N. Murphy. „Data model harmonization for the All Of Us Research Program: Transforming i2b2 data into the OMOP common data model“. PLOS ONE 14, Nr. 2 (19.02.2019): e0212463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212463.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
29
Kearsley-Fleet, L., K. Hyrich, M. Schaefer, D. Huschek, A. Strangfeld, J. Zavada, M. Lagová et al. „OP0105 FEASIBILITY AND USEFULNESS OF MAPPING BIOLOGIC REGISTRIES TO A COMMON DATA MODEL: ILLUSTRATION USING COMORBIDITIES“. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 80, Suppl 1 (19.05.2021): 58.2–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.888.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background:The Observational and Medical Outcomes Partnerships (OMOP) common data model (CDM) provides a framework for standardising health data with a view towards federated analyses, thus maximising the use and power of combining disparate datasets.Objectives:To assess feasibility and usefulness of mapping biologic registry data from different European countries to the OMOP CDM and present initial descriptive data regarding comorbidities.Methods:Five biologic registries, as part of a funded FOREUM project, have been mapped to the OMOP CDM: 1) the Czech biologics register (ATTRA), 2) Registro Español de Acontecimientos Adversos de Terapias Biológicas en Enfermedades Reumáticas (BIOBADASER), 3) British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA), 4) German biologics register ‘Rheumatoid arthritis observation of biologic therapy’ (RABBIT), and 5) Swiss register ‘Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases’ (SCQM). The mapping includes socio-demographic, observation period within the studies, baseline comorbidities, and baseline medications. Only patients with RA were included. Using R, registers received identical scripts to run on their mapped databases to produce an initial description of patient characteristics without the need to share patient-level data.Results:A total of 54,458 individuals are included the five registries being mapped to the OMOP CDM, see table. Age and gender distribution was similar across registries. All registers reported on cardiovascular system comorbidities, diabetes mellitus, mental disorders, and respiratory system comorbidities. However, it was noted that results of comorbidity mapping relies on what each register collect on each patient at the point of registration.Whilst the Charlson comorbidity index could be calculated within each registry, due to lack of the specific coding needed, such as “uncomplicated diabetes mellitus” / “end-organ damage diabetes mellitus”, it was felt to be an inaccurate measure. The granularity of the comorbidities was insufficient, as many registers coded, for example, diabetes mellitus without any extra information.Table 1.OARSI scoresRegistryATTRABIOBADASERBSRBR-RARABBITSCQMCountryCzechiaSpainUnited KingdomGermanySwitzerlandNumber of Participants23343012251791365210281Gender FemaleMale1808 (77%)526 (23%)2372 (79%)640 (21%)18995 (75%)6184 (25%)10191 (75%)3461 (25%)7584 (74%)2697 (26%)Age at observation start date59 (52, 66)56 (47, 63)58 (49, 66)58 (50, 67)57 (47, 66)First observation start dateFeb-2002Oct-1999Oct-2001Aug-2006March-1995Number of comorbidities1 (1, 2)1 (0, 2)1 (0, 2)2 (1, 3)2 (1, 4)Disorder of cardiovascular system1609 (69%)208 (7%)2239 (9%)6330 (46%)3969 (39%)Diabetes mellitus331 (14%)273 (9%)1770 (7%)1591 (12%)792 (8%)Depressive Disorder165 (7%)04971 (20%)1023 (7%)1337 (13%)Disorder of respiratory system215 (9%)209 (7%)4125 (16%)1282 (9%)1630 (16%)Conclusion:This is the first analysis of data from the newly mapped OMOP CDM across five European registers. Through mapping the registers into a CDM, and using the same script, the ability to undertake collaborative analysis without sharing patient level data outside of the country can be realised. Due to differences in study design and data capture, there needs to be a focus on harmonising the coding and analysing of the comorbidities and drugs across registries.Disclosure of Interests:Lianne Kearsley-Fleet: None declared, Kimme Hyrich: None declared, Martin Schaefer: None declared, Doreen Huschek: None declared, Anja Strangfeld: None declared, Jakub Zavada Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, UCB, Sanofi., Consultant of: Abbvie, UCB, Sanofi, Gilead., Markéta Lagová: None declared, Delphine Courvoisier Speakers bureau: Medtalks Switzerland, Christoph Tellenbach: None declared, Kim Lauper Speakers bureau: Medtalks Switzerland, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra: None declared, Nuria Montero: None declared, Jesús-Tomás Sánchez-Costa: None declared, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra Consultant of: Amgen (speaker fees and advisory board membership fees paid to DPA’s department) and UCB (consultancy fees paid to DPA’s department), Grant/research support from: grants and other from AMGEN, grants, non-financial support and other from UCB Biopharma, grants from Les Laboratoires Servier, outside the submitted work., Edward Burn: None declared
30
Glicksberg, Benjamin S., Boris Oskotsky, Nicholas Giangreco, Phyllis M. Thangaraj, Vivek Rudrapatna, Debajyoti Datta, Remi Frazier et al. „ROMOP: a light-weight R package for interfacing with OMOP-formatted electronic health record data“. JAMIA Open 2, Nr. 1 (04.01.2019): 10–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy059.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Objectives Electronic health record (EHR) data are increasingly used for biomedical discoveries. The nature of the data, however, requires expertise in both data science and EHR structure. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM) standardizes the language and structure of EHR data to promote interoperability of EHR data for research. While the OMOP CDM is valuable and more attuned to research purposes, it still requires extensive domain knowledge to utilize effectively, potentially limiting more widespread adoption of EHR data for research and quality improvement. Materials and methods We have created ROMOP: an R package for direct interfacing with EHR data in the OMOP CDM format. Results ROMOP streamlines typical EHR-related data processes. Its functions include exploration of data types, extraction and summarization of patient clinical and demographic data, and patient searches using any CDM vocabulary concept. Conclusion ROMOP is freely available under the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) license and can be obtained from GitHub (http://github.com/BenGlicksberg/ROMOP). We detail instructions for setup and use in the Supplementary Materials. Additionally, we provide a public sandbox server containing synthesized clinical data for users to explore OMOP data and ROMOP (http://romop.ucsf.edu).
31
Carus, Jasmin, Sylvia Nürnberg, Frank Ückert, Catarina Schlüter und Stefan Bartels. „Mapping Cancer Registry Data to the Episode Domain of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Model (OMOP)“. Applied Sciences 12, Nr. 8 (15.04.2022): 4010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12084010.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
A great challenge in the use of standardized cancer registry data is deriving reliable, evidence-based results from large amounts of data. A solution could be its mapping to a common data model such as OMOP, which represents knowledge in a unified semantic base, enabling decentralized analysis. The recently released Episode Domain of the OMOP CDM allows episodic modelling of a patient’ disease and treatment phases. In this study, we mapped oncology registry data to the Episode Domain. A total of 184,718 Episodes could be implemented, with the Concept of Cancer Drug Treatment most frequently. Additionally, source data were mapped to new terminologies as part of the release. It was possible to map ≈ 73.8% of the source data to the respective OMOP standard. Best mapping was achieved in the Procedure Domain with 98.7%. To evaluate the implementation, the survival probabilities of the CDM and source system were calculated (n = 2756/2902, median OAS = 82.2/91.1 months, 95% Cl = 77.4–89.5/84.4–100.9). In conclusion, the new release of the CDM increased its applicability, especially in observational cancer research. Regarding the mapping, a higher score could be achieved if terminologies which are frequently used in Europe are included in the Standardized Vocabulary Metadata Repository.
32
Sun, Yingcheng, Alex Butler, Latoya A. Stewart, Hao Liu, Chi Yuan, Christopher T. Southard, Jae Hyun Kim und Chunhua Weng. „Building an OMOP common data model-compliant annotated corpus for COVID-19 clinical trials“. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 118 (Juni 2021): 103790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103790.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
33
Belenkaya, Rimma, Michael J. Gurley, Asieh Golozar, Dmitry Dymshyts, Robert T. Miller, Andrew E. Williams, Shilpa Ratwani et al. „Extending the OMOP Common Data Model and Standardized Vocabularies to Support Observational Cancer Research“. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, Nr. 5 (Januar 2021): 12–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/cci.20.00079.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
34
Mayer, Craig S., und Vojtech Huser. „Learning important common data elements from shared study data: The All of Us program analysis“. PLOS ONE 18, Nr. 7 (07.07.2023): e0283601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283601.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
There are many initiatives attempting to harmonize data collection across human clinical studies using common data elements (CDEs). The increased use of CDEs in large prior studies can guide researchers planning new studies. For that purpose, we analyzed the All of Us (AoU) program, an ongoing US study intending to enroll one million participants and serve as a platform for numerous observational analyses. AoU adopted the OMOP Common Data Model to standardize both research (Case Report Form [CRF]) and real-world (imported from Electronic Health Records [EHRs]) data. AoU standardized specific data elements and values by including CDEs from terminologies such as LOINC and SNOMED CT. For this study, we defined all elements from established terminologies as CDEs and all custom concepts created in the Participant Provided Information (PPI) terminology as unique data elements (UDEs). We found 1 033 research elements, 4 592 element-value combinations and 932 distinct values. Most elements were UDEs (869, 84.1%), while most CDEs were from LOINC (103 elements, 10.0%) or SNOMED CT (60, 5.8%). Of the LOINC CDEs, 87 (53.1% of 164 CDEs) originated from previous data collection initiatives, such as PhenX (17 CDEs) and PROMIS (15 CDEs). On a CRF level, The Basics (12 of 21 elements, 57.1%) and Lifestyle (10 of 14, 71.4%) were the only CRFs with multiple CDEs. On a value level, 61.7% of distinct values are from an established terminology. AoU demonstrates the use of the OMOP model for integrating research and routine healthcare data (64 elements in both contexts), which allows for monitoring lifestyle and health changes outside the research setting. The increased inclusion of CDEs in large studies (like AoU) is important in facilitating the use of existing tools and improving the ease of understanding and analyzing the data collected, which is more challenging when using study specific formats.
35
Voss, Erica A., Rupa Makadia, Amy Matcho, Qianli Ma, Chris Knoll, Martijn Schuemie, Frank J. DeFalco, Ajit Londhe, Vivienne Zhu und Patrick B. Ryan. „Feasibility and utility of applications of the common data model to multiple, disparate observational health databases“. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 22, Nr. 3 (10.02.2015): 553–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocu023.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Objectives To evaluate the utility of applying the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) across multiple observational databases within an organization and to apply standardized analytics tools for conducting observational research. Materials and methods Six deidentified patient-level datasets were transformed to the OMOP CDM. We evaluated the extent of information loss that occurred through the standardization process. We developed a standardized analytic tool to replicate the cohort construction process from a published epidemiology protocol and applied the analysis to all 6 databases to assess time-to-execution and comparability of results. Results Transformation to the CDM resulted in minimal information loss across all 6 databases. Patients and observations excluded were due to identified data quality issues in the source system, 96% to 99% of condition records and 90% to 99% of drug records were successfully mapped into the CDM using the standard vocabulary. The full cohort replication and descriptive baseline summary was executed for 2 cohorts in 6 databases in less than 1 hour. Discussion The standardization process improved data quality, increased efficiency, and facilitated cross-database comparisons to support a more systematic approach to observational research. Comparisons across data sources showed consistency in the impact of inclusion criteria, using the protocol and identified differences in patient characteristics and coding practices across databases. Conclusion Standardizing data structure (through a CDM), content (through a standard vocabulary with source code mappings), and analytics can enable an institution to apply a network-based approach to observational research across multiple, disparate observational health databases.
36
Warner, Jeremy L., Dmitry Dymshyts, Christian G. Reich, Michael J. Gurley, Harry Hochheiser, Zachary H. Moldwin, Rimma Belenkaya, Andrew E. Williams und Peter C. Yang. „HemOnc: A new standard vocabulary for chemotherapy regimen representation in the OMOP common data model“. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 96 (August 2019): 103239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103239.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
37
Chakrabarti, Shreya, Anando Sen, Vojtech Huser, Gregory W. Hruby, Alexander Rusanov, David J. Albers und Chunhua Weng. „An Interoperable Similarity-based Cohort Identification Method Using the OMOP Common Data Model Version 5.0“. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research 1, Nr. 1 (Juni 2017): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41666-017-0005-6.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
38
Matcho, Amy, Patrick Ryan, Daniel Fife und Christian Reich. „Fidelity Assessment of a Clinical Practice Research Datalink Conversion to the OMOP Common Data Model“. Drug Safety 37, Nr. 11 (04.09.2014): 945–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0214-3.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
39
Cho, Sylvia, Margaret Sin, Demetra Tsapepas, Leigh-Anne Dale, Syed A. Husain, Sumit Mohan und Karthik Natarajan. „Content Coverage Evaluation of the OMOP Vocabulary on the Transplant Domain Focusing on Concepts Relevant for Kidney Transplant Outcomes Analysis“. Applied Clinical Informatics 11, Nr. 04 (August 2020): 650–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716528.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Background Improving outcomes of transplant recipients within and across transplant centers is important with the increasing number of organ transplantations being performed. The current practice is to analyze the outcomes based on patient level data submitted to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Augmenting the UNOS data with other sources such as the electronic health record will enrich the outcomes analysis, for which a common data model (CDM) can be a helpful tool for transforming heterogeneous source data into a uniform format. Objectives In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of representing concepts from the UNOS transplant registry forms with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM vocabulary to understand the content coverage of OMOP vocabulary on transplant-specific concepts. Methods Two annotators manually mapped a total of 3,571 unique concepts extracted from the UNOS registry forms to concepts in the OMOP vocabulary. Concept mappings were evaluated by (1) examining the agreement among the initial two annotators and (2) investigating the number of UNOS concepts not mapped to a concept in the OMOP vocabulary and then classifying them. A subset of mappings was validated by clinicians. Results There was a substantial agreement between annotators with a kappa score of 0.71. We found that 55.5% of UNOS concepts could not be represented with OMOP standard concepts. The majority of unmapped UNOS concepts were categorized into transplant, measurement, condition, and procedure concepts. Conclusion We identified categories of unmapped concepts and found that some transplant-specific concepts do not exist in the OMOP vocabulary. We suggest that adding these missing concepts to OMOP would facilitate further research in the transplant domain.
40
Ryu, Borim, Eunsil Yoon, Seok Kim, Sejoon Lee, Hyunyoung Baek, Soyoung Yi, Hee Young Na et al. „Transformation of Pathology Reports Into the Common Data Model With Oncology Module: Use Case for Colon Cancer“. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, Nr. 12 (09.12.2020): e18526. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18526.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background Common data models (CDMs) help standardize electronic health record data and facilitate outcome analysis for observational and longitudinal research. An analysis of pathology reports is required to establish fundamental information infrastructure for data-driven colon cancer research. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM is used in distributed research networks for clinical data; however, it requires conversion of free text–based pathology reports into the CDM’s format. There are few use cases of representing cancer data in CDM. Objective In this study, we aimed to construct a CDM database of colon cancer–related pathology with natural language processing (NLP) for a research platform that can utilize both clinical and omics data. The essential text entities from the pathology reports are extracted, standardized, and converted to the OMOP CDM format in order to utilize the pathology data in cancer research. Methods We extracted clinical text entities, mapped them to the standard concepts in the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics vocabularies, and built databases and defined relations for the CDM tables. Major clinical entities were extracted through NLP on pathology reports of surgical specimens, immunohistochemical studies, and molecular studies of colon cancer patients at a tertiary general hospital in South Korea. Items were extracted from each report using regular expressions in Python. Unstructured data, such as text that does not have a pattern, were handled with expert advice by adding regular expression rules. Our own dictionary was used for normalization and standardization to deal with biomarker and gene names and other ungrammatical expressions. The extracted clinical and genetic information was mapped to the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes databases and the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) standard terminologies recommended by the OMOP CDM. The database-table relationships were newly defined through SNOMED standard terminology concepts. The standardized data were inserted into the CDM tables. For evaluation, 100 reports were randomly selected and independently annotated by a medical informatics expert and a nurse. Results We examined and standardized 1848 immunohistochemical study reports, 3890 molecular study reports, and 12,352 pathology reports of surgical specimens (from 2017 to 2018). The constructed and updated database contained the following extracted colorectal entities: (1) NOTE_NLP, (2) MEASUREMENT, (3) CONDITION_OCCURRENCE, (4) SPECIMEN, and (5) FACT_RELATIONSHIP of specimen with condition and measurement. Conclusions This study aimed to prepare CDM data for a research platform to take advantage of all omics clinical and patient data at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for colon cancer pathology. A more sophisticated preparation of the pathology data is needed for further research on cancer genomics, and various types of text narratives are the next target for additional research on the use of data in the CDM.
41
Kim, Ki-Hoon, Wona Choi, Soo-Jeong Ko, Dong-Jin Chang, Yeon-Woog Chung, Se-Hyun Chang, Jae-Kwon Kim, Dai-Jin Kim und In-Young Choi. „Multi-Center Healthcare Data Quality Measurement Model and Assessment Using OMOP CDM“. Applied Sciences 11, Nr. 19 (02.10.2021): 9188. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11199188.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Healthcare data has economic value and is evaluated as such. Therefore, it attracted global attention from observational and clinical studies alike. Recently, the importance of data quality research emerged in healthcare data research. Various studies are being conducted on this topic. In this study, we propose a DQ4HEALTH model that can be applied to healthcare when reviewing existing data quality literature. The model includes 5 dimensions and 415 validation rules. The four evaluation indicators include the net pass rate (NPR), weighted pass rate (WPR), net dimensional pass rate (NDPR), and weighted dimensional pass rate (WDPR). They were used to evaluate the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM) at three medical institutions. These indicators identify differences in data quality between the institutions. The NPRs of the three institutions (A, B, and C) were 96.58%, 90.08%, and 90.87%, respectively, and the WPR was 98.52%, 94.26%, and 94.81%, respectively. In the quality evaluation of the dimensions, the consistency was 70.06% of the total error data. The WDPRs were 98.22%, 94.74%, and 95.05% for institutions A, B, and C, respectively. This study presented indices for comparing quality evaluation models and quality in the healthcare field. Using these indices, medical institutions can evaluate the quality of their data and suggest practical directions for decreasing errors.
42
Lynch, Kristine E., Stephen A. Deppen, Scott L. DuVall, Benjamin Viernes, Aize Cao, Daniel Park, Elizabeth Hanchrow, Kushan Hewa, Peter Greaves und Michael E. Matheny. „Incrementally Transforming Electronic Medical Records into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: A Multidimensional Quality Assurance Approach“. Applied Clinical Informatics 10, Nr. 05 (Oktober 2019): 794–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697598.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Background The development and adoption of health care common data models (CDMs) has addressed some of the logistical challenges of performing research on data generated from disparate health care systems by standardizing data representations and leveraging standardized terminology to express clinical information consistently. However, transforming a data system into a CDM is not a trivial task, and maintaining an operational, enterprise capable CDM that is incrementally updated within a data warehouse is challenging. Objectives To develop a quality assurance (QA) process and code base to accompany our incremental transformation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse health care database into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM to prevent incremental load errors. Methods We designed and implemented a multistage QA) approach centered on completeness, value conformance, and relational conformance data-quality elements. For each element we describe key incremental load challenges, our extract, transform, and load (ETL) solution of data to overcome those challenges, and potential impacts of incremental load failure. Results Completeness and value conformance data-quality elements are most affected by incremental changes to the CDW, while updates to source identifiers impact relational conformance. ETL failures surrounding these elements lead to incomplete and inaccurate capture of clinical concepts as well as data fragmentation across patients, providers, and locations. Conclusion Development of robust QA processes supporting accurate transformation of OMOP and other CDMs from source data is still in evolution, and opportunities exist to extend the existing QA framework and tools used for incremental ETL QA processes.
43
Nguyen, Phung-Anh, Min-Huei Hsu, Tzu-Hao Chang, Hsuan-Chia Yang, Chih-Wei Huang, Chia-Te Liao, Christine Y. Lu und Jason C. Hsu. „Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database: a collaborative hospital EHR database aligned with international common data standards“. BMJ Health & Care Informatics 31, Nr. 1 (Mai 2024): e100890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100890.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
ObjectiveThe objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the development and features of the Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database (TMUCRD), a repository of real-world data (RWD) derived from electronic health records (EHRs) and other sources.MethodsTMUCRD was developed by integrating EHRs from three affiliated hospitals, including Taipei Medical University Hospital, Wan-Fang Hospital and Shuang-Ho Hospital. The data cover over 15 years and include diverse patient care information. The database was converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM) for standardisation.ResultsTMUCRD comprises 89 tables (eg, 29 tables for each hospital and 2 linked tables), including demographics, diagnoses, medications, procedures and measurements, among others. It encompasses data from more than 4.15 million patients with various medical records, spanning from the year 2004 to 2021. The dataset offers insights into disease prevalence, medication usage, laboratory tests and patient characteristics.DiscussionTMUCRD stands out due to its unique advantages, including diverse data types, comprehensive patient information, linked mortality and cancer registry data, regular updates and a swift application process. Its compatibility with the OMOP CDM enhances its usability and interoperability.ConclusionTMUCRD serves as a valuable resource for researchers and scholars interested in leveraging RWD for clinical research. Its availability and integration of diverse healthcare data contribute to a collaborative and data-driven approach to advancing medical knowledge and practice.
44
Rachidi, Salma, Alexey Ryzhenkov, Valtteri Nieminen, Tomi P. Mäkelä, Oscar Brück, Kimmo Porkka und Eric Fey. „Deep Learning Models for Predicting Overall Survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Short-Term Longitudinal Blood Measurements and the Omop Common Data Model“. Blood 144, Supplement 1 (05.11.2024): 1476. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-209871.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background Accurate prediction of outcome of individual acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is crucial for guiding value-based treatment decisions and improving survival. However, existing prognostic models are based on static, retrospective data, mostly from clinical trials, which do not fully capture the current real-world population and treatment practice of AML. Short term follow-up complete blood count (CBC) measurements are routinely taken, but current models do not account these longitudinal data and their prognostic value is unknown. Moreover, the lack of standardized and interoperable data across different health care systems hampers the development and validation of scalable, predictive models. These types of close-to-realtime models can be continuously and even semi-automatically updated and integrated into clinical decision systems. Deep learning is a promising approach for building complex and accurate predictive models from rich and longitudinal real-world data (RWD), particularly when presented in a standardized common data model (OMOP CDM), which is being universally adopted (e.g. ASH Data Hub, The All of Us Research Program, DARWIN EU). Aims Test the feasibility of using OMOP RWD, including longitudinal, short-term follow up data, to build predictive models for precision medicine. Develop and implement a modeling framework. Provide a proof of concept by building a robust AML model to predict overall survival based on baseline and short-term follow up CBC measurements. Methods We used OMOP RWD from Helsinki University Hospital for deep learning models for predicting overall survival of AML patients. All patients diagnosed with AML between 2000 and 2022 and had at least three CBC measurements (incl leukocyte differential and LDH) within 21 days after diagnosis. Missing values were imputed with -1, allowing the model to learn that -1 means missing. Data were split into training, test, and validation sets. We used a two-layer fully connected artificial neural network (ANN) based on PyTorch as the base model, connected to a survival model called DeepHit as the output layer. DeepHit is a deep learning approach that can handle competing risks and provide individualized survival predictions. Dropout layer with a dropout rate of 0.4 were used to avoid the risk of overfitting. We trained the model using cross validation on the training split, and validated it on the independent test set. Kaplan Meier plots were created by splitting the cohort into three strata (upper, intermediate, and lower quantile) based on the model predicted patient-specific risk. Results After applying the inclusion criterion of having at least three CBC measurements within 21 days after diagnosis, 614 patients remained for the analysis. The data were split into training, validation, and test sets, of 393, 98, and 123 patients, accordingly. The model was trained on the training set using cross validation, and the best performing model was selected based on the validation set. The model converged quickly, requiring less than 100 epochs to reach the optimal performance. We experimented with different architectures of the ANN, varying the number of hidden layers and nodes. We found that the model performance was not sensitive to the architecture, and even a simple two-layer network with 16 nodes in each layer achieved good results. The final model was able to stratify the patients into three risk groups with markedly different survival probabilities. 2-year survival for the model-predicted low versus high-risk patient groups was 71% vs 10% in the training and 52% vs 11 % in the independent test cohort. Note that the model can also provide individualized survival probability curves for each patient and the uncertainty of the predictions over time. Conclusion Building robust predictive models based on longitudinal, close to real-time OMOP RWD is feasible and has great potential. Using dynamic, short term, universally available follow up data only - CBC measurements up to 21 days post diagnosis - holds valuable information for predicting long-term prognosis, including overall survival. These models will be further refined using more traditional baseline features (cytogenetics, mutation profiles, clinical characteristics) and iteratively matured in a multicenter network setting using advanced modeling and swarm learning, a form of distributed machine learning tailored towards medicine.
45
Kang, Byungkon, Jisang Yoon, Ha Young Kim, Sung Jin Jo, Yourim Lee und Hye Jin Kam. „Deep-learning-based automated terminology mapping in OMOP-CDM“. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 28, Nr. 7 (13.05.2021): 1489–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab030.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Objective Accessing medical data from multiple institutions is difficult owing to the interinstitutional diversity of vocabularies. Standardization schemes, such as the common data model, have been proposed as solutions to this problem, but such schemes require expensive human supervision. This study aims to construct a trainable system that can automate the process of semantic interinstitutional code mapping. Materials and Methods To automate mapping between source and target codes, we compute the embedding-based semantic similarity between corresponding descriptive sentences. We also implement a systematic approach for preparing training data for similarity computation. Experimental results are compared to traditional word-based mappings. Results The proposed model is compared against the state-of-the-art automated matching system, which is called Usagi, of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership common data model. By incorporating multiple negative training samples per positive sample, our semantic matching method significantly outperforms Usagi. Its matching accuracy is at least 10% greater than that of Usagi, and this trend is consistent across various top-k measurements. Discussion The proposed deep learning-based mapping approach outperforms previous simple word-level matching algorithms because it can account for contextual and semantic information. Additionally, we demonstrate that the manner in which negative training samples are selected significantly affects the overall performance of the system. Conclusion Incorporating the semantics of code descriptions more significantly increases matching accuracy compared to traditional text co-occurrence-based approaches. The negative training sample collection methodology is also an important component of the proposed trainable system that can be adopted in both present and future related systems.
46
Maier, C., L. Lang, H. Storf, P. Vormstein, R. Bieber, J. Bernarding, T. Herrmann et al. „Towards Implementation of OMOP in a German University Hospital Consortium“. Applied Clinical Informatics 09, Nr. 01 (Januar 2018): 054–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1617452.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background In 2015, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research initiated a large data integration and data sharing research initiative to improve the reuse of data from patient care and translational research. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model and the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) tools could be used as a core element in this initiative for harmonizing the terminologies used as well as facilitating the federation of research analyses across institutions. Objective To realize an OMOP/OHDSI-based pilot implementation within a consortium of eight German university hospitals, evaluate the applicability to support data harmonization and sharing among them, and identify potential enhancement requirements. Methods The vocabularies and terminological mapping required for importing the fact data were prepared, and the process for importing the data from the source files was designed. For eight German university hospitals, a virtual machine preconfigured with the OMOP database and the OHDSI tools as well as the jobs to import the data and conduct the analysis was provided. Last, a federated/distributed query to test the approach was executed. Results While the mapping of ICD-10 German Modification succeeded with a rate of 98.8% of all terms for diagnoses, the procedures could not be mapped and hence an extension to the OMOP standard terminologies had to be made.Overall, the data of 3 million inpatients with approximately 26 million conditions, 21 million procedures, and 23 million observations have been imported.A federated query to identify a cohort of colorectal cancer patients was successfully executed and yielded 16,701 patient cases visualized in a Sunburst plot. Conclusion OMOP/OHDSI is a viable open source solution for data integration in a German research consortium. Once the terminology problems can be solved, researchers can build on an active community for further development.
47
Zhou, Xiaofeng, Sundaresan Murugesan, Harshvinder Bhullar, Qing Liu, Bing Cai, Chuck Wentworth und Andrew Bate. „An Evaluation of the THIN Database in the OMOP Common Data Model for Active Drug Safety Surveillance“. Drug Safety 36, Nr. 2 (04.01.2013): 119–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-012-0009-3.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
48
Bae, Woo Kyung, Jihoon Cho, Seok Kim, Borham Kim, Hyunyoung Baek, Wongeun Song und Sooyoung Yoo. „Coronary Artery Computed Tomography Angiography for Preventing Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease: Observational Cohort Study Using the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics’ Common Data Model“. JMIR Medical Informatics 10, Nr. 10 (13.10.2022): e41503. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41503.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background Cardio-cerebrovascular diseases (CVDs) result in 17.5 million deaths annually worldwide, accounting for 46.2% of noncommunicable causes of death, and are the leading cause of death, followed by cancer, respiratory disease, and diabetes mellitus. Coronary artery computed tomography angiography (CCTA), which detects calcification in the coronary arteries, can be used to detect asymptomatic but serious vascular disease. It allows for noninvasive and quick testing despite involving radiation exposure. Objective The objective of our study was to investigate the effectiveness of CCTA screening on CVD outcomes by using the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics’ Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM) data and the population-level estimation method. Methods Using electronic health record–based OMOP-CDM data, including health questionnaire responses, adults (aged 30-74 years) without a history of CVD were selected, and 5-year CVD outcomes were compared between patients undergoing CCTA (target group) and a comparison group via 1:1 propensity score matching. Participants were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups based on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score and Framingham risk score (FRS) for subgroup analyses. Results The 2-year and 5-year risk scores were compared as secondary outcomes between the two groups. In total, 8787 participants were included in both the target group and comparison group. No significant differences (calibration P=.37) were found between the hazard ratios of the groups at 5 years. The subgroup analysis also revealed no significant differences between the ASCVD risk scores and FRSs of the groups at 5 years (ASCVD risk score: P=.97; FRS: P=.85). However, the CCTA group showed a significantly lower increase in risk scores at 2 years (ASCVD risk score: P=.03; FRS: P=.02). Conclusions Although we could not confirm a significant difference in the preventive effects of CCTA screening for CVDs over a long period of 5 years, it may have a beneficial effect on risk score management over 2 years.
49
Lenert, Leslie A., Andrey V. Ilatovskiy, James Agnew, Patricia Rudisill, Jeff Jacobs, Duncan Weatherston und Kenneth R. Deans Jr. „Automated production of research data marts from a canonical fast healthcare interoperability resource data repository: applications to COVID-19 research“. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 28, Nr. 8 (12.06.2021): 1605–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab108.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Objective The rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for timely data from the healthcare systems for research. To meet this need, several large new data consortia have been developed that require frequent updating and sharing of electronic health record (EHR) data in different common data models (CDMs) to create multi-institutional databases for research. Traditionally, each CDM has had a custom pipeline for extract, transform, and load operations for production and incremental updates of data feeds to the networks from raw EHR data. However, the demands of COVID-19 research for timely data are far higher, and the requirements for updating faster than previous collaborative research using national data networks have increased. New approaches need to be developed to address these demands. Methods In this article, we describe the use of the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resource (FHIR) data model as a canonical data model and the automated transformation of clinical data to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network (PCORnet) and Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDMs for data sharing and research collaboration on COVID-19. Results FHIR data resources could be transformed to operational PCORnet and OMOP CDMs with minimal production delays through a combination of real-time and postprocessing steps, leveraging the FHIR data subscription feature. Conclusions The approach leverages evolving standards for the availability of EHR data developed to facilitate data exchange under the 21st Century Cures Act and could greatly enhance the availability of standardized datasets for research.
50
Lee, Kyung Ae, Heung Yong Jin, Seung Han Jeong, Jang Hyeon Kim, Yuji Kim und Tae Sun Park. „Trends in Medication Utilization and Glycemic Control Among Type 2 Diabetes Using a Common Data Model Based on Electronic Health Records From 2000 to 2019“. Journal of the Endocrine Society 5, Supplement_1 (01.05.2021): A481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.983.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Analyzing the treatment patterns of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in real practice helps to understand the flow of diabetes management and establish further management plans. Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) is an international collaboration created an international data network (Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model, OMOP-CDM). This study was aim to analyze treatment patterns of T2DM using the OMOP-CDM based on electronic health record (EHR) data and to assess whether CDM analysis was feasible to diabetes research. This is a retrospective, observational study using the EHR data of Jeonbuk National University Hospital (JNUH) transformed into OMOP-CDM. The data consisted of medical records of patients visits from January 2000 to December 2019. ATLAS ver. 2.7.6, an OHDSI’s open-source software is publicly available, was used for analysis. The 20 year old EHR data of a JNUH contain about 1.5 million patients. The proportion of adult patients treated for T2DM increased from 1,867 (1.6%) in 2000 to 9,972 (5.1%) in 2019. Sulfonylurea (SU) was the most prescribed drug (73%) followed by metformin (55%) in 2000. On the other hand, in 2019, metformin was the most prescribed (64%), and DPP-4 inhibitor prescription increased rapidly up to 55%, while the SU prescription rate decreased to 36%. The rate of insulin treatment ranged from 16% to 24%, which is higher than national surveyed based on health insurance data. Over time, monotherapy decreased while dual, triple, and quadruple combinations steadily increased. Dual combination was the most common with metformin and DPP-4 inhibitor, triple combination was the most with metformin, SU, and DPP-4 inhibitor in 2019. In analysis of annual HbA1c trends, the proportion of patients with HbA1c of 7% or lower increased (from 32.8% 2000 to 50.2% in 2019). Proportion of patients with HbA1c of 9% or more decreased from 30% to 12%. However, it was found that about half of T2DM patients still had HbA1c values above the target range. In addition, the number of patients who visited our emergency room for severe hypoglycemia did not decrease. Present study revealed that CDM analysis was feasible for diabetes research. Medication utilization patterns have changed significantly over the past 20 years with a shift towards newer drugs. Despite these changes and clinical efforts, improvement in glycemic control is still a challenge and hypoglycemic is still a problem to overcome.