Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Multicriteria decision making“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Multicriteria decision making" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Multicriteria decision making":
Hendriks, Margriet M. W. B., Jan H. de Boer, Age K. Smilde und Durk A. Doornbos. „Multicriteria decision making“. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 16, Nr. 3 (Dezember 1992): 175–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(92)80036-4.
Yager, R. R. „Modeling Prioritized Multicriteria Decision Making“. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) 34, Nr. 6 (Dezember 2004): 2396–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tsmcb.2004.837348.
Novikova, Natalia M., und Irina I. Pospelova. „Multicriteria decision making under uncertainty“. Mathematical Programming 92, Nr. 3 (01.05.2002): 537–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s101070100289.
Hum Tchemra, Angela. „Adaptivity in Multicriteria Decision Making“. IEEE Latin America Transactions 9, Nr. 2 (April 2011): 160–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tla.2011.5765569.
Hao, Qinxia, Shah Nazir, Xiaoxu Gao, Li Ma und Muhammad Ilyas. „A Review on Multicriteria Decision Support System and Industrial Internet of Things for Source Code Transformation“. Scientific Programming 2021 (13.01.2021): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6661272.
Piegat, Andrzej, und Wojciech Sałabun. „Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method“. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing 2014 (2014): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/536492.
Yager, Ronald R. „Multicriteria Decision-Making Using Fuzzy Measures“. Cybernetics and Systems 46, Nr. 3-4 (03.04.2015): 150–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2015.1012884.
Janssen, Ron, und Marjan Van Herwijnen. „A toolbox for multicriteria decision-making“. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 6, Nr. 1/2 (2006): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijetm.2006.008252.
Grabisch, Michel. „Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making“. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 69, Nr. 3 (Februar 1995): 279–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)00174-6.
Cziner, Krisztina, Mari Tuomaala und Markku Hurme. „Multicriteria decision making in process integration“. Journal of Cleaner Production 13, Nr. 5 (April 2005): 475–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.09.003.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Multicriteria decision making":
Mota, Pedro Jorge Gomes. „Comparative analysis of multicriteria decision making methods“. Master's thesis, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/11263.
The main objective of this dissertation is to perform a Comparative Analysis of different Multicriteria Decision Making Methods applied to real-world problems, in order to produce relevant information to enable the incorporation of those methods on computational platforms. The current document presents a simple case study concerning a decision support application targeted for a real problem regarding retrofitting alternatives of a building with energy efficiency impact. The application process was started with the selection of two Multicriteria Decision Making Methods guided by a preexisting framework, and resulted in the choice of AHP and PROMETHEE II methodologies. These two methods were then combined with three different decision maker profiles (Conservative, Moderate and Aggressive) created by means of risk assessment profiling techniques for portfolio allocation. Afterwards, the chosen decision criteria were disposed in a Risk Pyramid according to their inherent level of risk regarding project evaluation. A match was then performed between the decision maker profiles and each criterion, so as to define a proper set of weights for the decision criteria and preference functions, with corresponding preference and indifference thresholds. Finally, three different sets of results (one for each decision maker profile) were produced using appropriate software, and a Sensitivity Analysis was performed over the criteria to understand their influence on the solution. The general conclusion of this Comparative Analysis is that the increase in the preference modelling ability of the methods brings up the least expected alternatives as recommendations for the decision maker. Besides, we have concluded that the decision profiles that allocate bigger weights to the riskiest criteria are the ones that produce the more dispersed set of results within each method application and within each decision maker profile.
Van, Dyk Theron Van Zyl. „Decision support systems for solving discrete multicriteria decision making problems“. Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14300.
The aim of this study was the design and implementation of an interactive decision support system, assisting a single decision maker in reaching a satisfactory decision when faced by a multicriteria decision making problem. There are clearly two components involved in designing such a system, namely the concept of decision support systems (DSS) and the area of multicriteria decision making (MCDM). The multicriteria decision making environment as well as the definitions of the multicriteria decision making concepts used, are discussed in chapter 1. Chapter 2 gives a brief historical review on MCDM, highlighting the origins of some of the more well-known methods for solving MCDM problems. A detailed discussion of interactive decision making is also given. Chapter 3 is concerned with the DSS concept, including a historical review thereof, a framework for the design of a DSS, various development approaches as well as the components constituting a decision support system. In chapter 4, the possibility of integrating the two concepts, MCDM and DSS, are discussed. A detailed discussion of various methodologies for solving MCDM problems is given in chapter 5. Specific attention is given to identifying the methodologies to be implemented in the DSS. Chapter 6 can be seen as a theoretical description of the system developed, while Chapter 7 is concerned with the evaluation procedures used for testing the system. A final summary and concluding remarks are given in Chapter 8.
Chiu, Gerald Wing Cheong. „Multicriteria decision making models for studying construction safety /“. access full-text access abstract and table of contents, 2005. http://libweb.cityu.edu.hk/cgi-bin/ezdb/thesis.pl?mphil-bc-b19887498a.pdf.
"Submitted to Department of Building and Construction in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy" Includes bibliographical references (leaves 239-241)
Durbach, Ian N. „The treatment of uncertainty in multicriteria decision making“. Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15424.
The nature of human decision making dictates that a decision must often be considered under conditions of uncertainty. Decisions may be influenced by uncertain future events, doubts regarding the precision of inputs, doubts as to what the decision maker considers important, and many other forms of uncertainty. The multicriteria decision models that are designed to facilitate and aid decision making must therefore consider these uncertainties if they are to be effective. In this thesis, we consider the treatment of uncertainty in multicriteria decision making (MCDM), with a specific view to investigating the types of uncertainty that are most relevant to MCDM, [and] how the uncertainties identified as relevant may be treated by various different MCDM methodologies.
Suhendra. „Integrated improvement of distillation unit using multicriteria decision making analysis“. [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2007. http://se6.kobv.de:8000/btu/volltexte/2007/170.
Heynes, Wynford Gustav. „Selection of multicriteria decision making methodologies in scenario based planning“. Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14722.
This dissertation investigates the application of Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodologies to the area of scenario based policy planning. We examine how the tools of MCDM can be used to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) that would allow management or policy planners to resolve conflicting goals and interests. Ideally, the resolution would be obtained by the various decision makers (DMs) in such a manner, that it satisfies all the relevant interest groupings at a maximum level of achievement for all concerned. This is not always possible and compromises need to be made that are fair and equitable to all the relevant interests. Stewart et al. (1993), in a report entitled: "Scenario Based Multicriteria Policy Planning for Water Management in South Africa", develop the principles of a procedure for implementing scenario based multicriteria policy planning. Their iterative procedure is illustrated in figure 2.1, chapter 2, of this paper. In this dissertation, we refine certain parts of this procedure and the two areas in particular that we have looked at are: (1) filtering a large set of policy scenarios (Background Set), that could be a continuum, to form a smaller set (Foreground Set), and (2) further reducing the smaller set to form a solution set of policy scenarios. (The generic terms "Background Set" and "Foreground Set" are defined in section 2.1 of chapter 2.) The main objectives of this study were therefore mainly twofold and are as follows: (1) to determine what MCDM methods are relevant to natural resources management (using water as a case study), and (2) to investigate how these methods need to be adopted for use in an interactive DSS. We address the first objective by surveying the literature in an attempt to identify potential MCDM approaches that are suitable to (i) reduce a large set of alternatives, analogous to the Background Set, to a more manageable smaller set, analogous to the Foreground Set of alternatives, and (ii) refine this Foreground Set in order to present the DMs with a solution set of alternatives from which University of Cape Town they will make their final selection. The literature has until now not dealt explicitly with these two issues and we had to adapt certain MCDM approaches, many of which have been developed in a linear programming context, to suit our purposes.
Hodgkin, Julie. „Provision of intelligent user support in decision support systems“. Thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.366908.
Mostofi, Camare Hooman. „Multicriteria Decision Evaluation of Adaptation Strategies for Vulnerable Coastal Communities“. Thèse, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/20112.
Wagholikar, Amol S., und N/A. „Acquisition of Fuzzy Measures in Multicriteria Decision Making Using Similarity-based Reasoning“. Griffith University. School of Information and Communication Technology, 2007. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20071214.152324.
Wagholikar, Amol S. „Acquisition of Fuzzy Measures in Multicriteria Decision Making Using Similarity-based Reasoning“. Thesis, Griffith University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365403.
Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
School of Information and Communication Technology
Full Text
Bücher zum Thema "Multicriteria decision making":
Gal, Tomas, Theodor J. Stewart und Thomas Hanne, Hrsg. Multicriteria Decision Making. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5025-9.
Vincke, Philippe. Multicriteria decision-aid. Chichester [England]: Wiley, 1992.
Pedrycz, Witold, Petr Ekel und Roberta Parreiras. Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470974032.
Ehrgott, Matthias. Multicriteria optimization. 2. Aufl. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
Vincke, Philippe. Multicriteria decision-aid. Chichester: Wiley, 1992.
Stewart, Theodor J., und Robin C. van den Honert, Hrsg. Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45772-2.
Roy, Bernard. Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
Roy, Bernard. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1996.
International Conference on MCDM (11th 1994 Coimbra, Portugal). Multicriteria analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Bernard, Roy. Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
Buchteile zum Thema "Multicriteria decision making":
Eiselt, H. A., und C. L. Sandblom. „Multicriteria Decision Making“. In Decision Analysis, Location Models, and Scheduling Problems, 23–71. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24722-7_2.
Michalewicz, Zbigniew, und David B. Fogel. „Multicriteria Decision-Making“. In How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics, 435–63. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07807-5_16.
Chan, Yupo. „Multicriteria Decision Making“. In Location Theory and Decision Analysis, 213–80. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15663-2_5.
Eiselt, H. A., und Carl-Louis Sandblom. „Multicriteria Decision Making“. In Springer Texts in Business and Economics, 333–42. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31054-6_10.
Gonzales, Christophe, und Patrice Perny. „Multicriteria Decision Making“. In A Guided Tour of Artificial Intelligence Research, 519–48. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06164-7_16.
Eiselt, H. A., Vladimir Marianov und Joyendu Bhadury. „Multicriteria Decision Making“. In International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 37–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23876-5_3.
Carlsson, Christer, und Robert Fuller. „Interdependence In Multiple Criteria Decision Making“. In Multicriteria Analysis, 25–36. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_4.
Stewart, Theodor J. „Scenario Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Making“. In Multicriteria Analysis, 519–28. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_49.
Chakhar, Salem, und Vincent Mousseau. „Multicriteria Decision Making, Spatial“. In Encyclopedia of GIS, 747–53. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1_839.
Chakhar, Salem, und Vincent Mousseau. „Multicriteria Decision Making, Spatial“. In Encyclopedia of GIS, 1–9. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_839-2.
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Multicriteria decision making":
Tinguaro Rodriguez, J., Begona Vitoriano, Javier Montero und Daniel Gomez. „Modelling bipolar multicriteria decision making“. In 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Milti-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mcdm.2009.4938837.
Ali, Rekik, Temani Moncef und Ghedira Khaled. „Fuzzy model for multicriteria decision making“. In 2014 Information and Communication Technologies Innovation and Application (ICTIA). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ictia.2014.7883753.
Wang, Chih-Huang, und Shyi-Ming Chen. „A Generalized Model for Multicriteria Decision Making“. In 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmlc.2007.4370442.
Homenda, Wladyslaw, Agnieszka Jastrzebska, Witold Pedrycz, Fusheng Yu und Yihan Wang. „Multicriteria Decision Making: Scale, Polarity, Symmetry, Interpretability“. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fuzz48607.2020.9177705.
Andrienko, Gennady L., und Natalia V. Andrienko. „Interactive visual tools for spatial multicriteria decision making“. In the Working Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1556262.1556282.
Dror-Rein, Elana, und Harvey B. Mitchell. „Fuzzy multicriteria decision making in the assignment problem“. In Optical Science, Engineering and Instrumentation '97, herausgegeben von Oliver E. Drummond. SPIE, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.279535.
Zaabar, I., Y. Beauregard und M. Paquet. „Using Multicriteria Decision Making Methods to Manage Systems Obsolescence“. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ieem.2018.8607784.
Kong, Feng, und Hongyan Liu. „The Relative Grey Relation Closeness Multicriteria Decision Making Method“. In Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isda.2006.51.
„MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN BALANCED MODEL OF FUZZY SETS“. In 4th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0001620500400046.
Poleshchuk, Olga M. „Novel Approach to Multicriteria Decision Making Under Z-Information“. In 2019 International Russian Automation Conference. IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/rusautocon.2019.8867607.