Thematische Bibliographien / Mitākṣara

Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Mitākṣara“

Autor: Grafiati

Veröffentlicht am 25. Juli 2024

Zuletzt aktualisiert am 26. Juli 2024

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bücher
Buchteile

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Mitākṣara" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Bücher zum Thema "Mitākṣara"

Siranūrakar, Śrīnivāsa. Vijṅ̃ānēśvara - Mitākṣara. Gulabargā: Prasārāṅga, Gulabargā Viśvavidyālaya, 2007.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Svayamprakāśānanda. Mitākṣarā: Śrīgauḍapādācāryakr̥tamāṇḍūkyakārikā vyākhyā. 2. Aufl. Vārāṇasī, Bhārata: Caukhambhā Saṃskr̥ta Saṃsthāna, 1986.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Svāmī, Bhāṣyam. Taittirīyopaniṣat vyākhyāṣaṭkopetā: Pratipadārthadīpikā, Mitākṣarā, Prakāśikā, Taittirīyopaniṣadbhāṣyam, Ānandabhāṣyam, Subodhinī vimarśātmakaṃ sampādanam. Yādavādriḥ, Melukoṭe: Saṃskŕ̥ta-Saṃśodhana-Saṃsat, 2005.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Davis, Donald R. An Indian Philosophy of Law. Herausgegeben von Jonardon Ganeri. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199314621.013.9.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Composed in the twelfth century ce, the Epitome of the Law (Mitākṣarā) by Vijñāneśvara is a celebrated and influential compendium of Indian law and jurisprudence. In form a commentary on the versified Laws of Yājñavalkya, it presents sophisticated and multifaceted discussions of all the major topics dealing with Hindu religious and legal duties collectively called dharma. This chapter examines Vijñāneśvara’s approach to basic problems of legal philosophy such as the sources and types of law, legal interpretation and reasoning, legal and moral obligation, the role of the state, and legal pluralism. It concludes by considering the driving metaphor that underlies Vijñāneśvara’s legal philosophy: law is a ritual, both the act and the obligation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Buchteile zum Thema "Mitākṣara"

Fleming, Christopher T. „The Bhāṭṭa School of Benares“. In Ownership and Inheritance in Sanskrit Jurisprudence, 115–57. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852377.003.0004.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This chapter examines the reception of Dāyabhāga-centred, Gauḍa jurisprudence and Navya-Nyāya theories of ownership in the Dharmaśāstra and Mīmāṃsā writings of the Bhaṭṭa family of Mahārāṣṭrian Deśastha brāhmaṇas who led the southern (Dākṣinātya) community of paṇḍitas in Vārāṇasī between the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The Bhaṭṭas’ polemic against the Navadvīpan, Navya-Nyāya-inflected school of jurisprudence marks a watershed moment when the Mitākṣarā and its Mīmāṃsā-derived theory of ownership were incorporated into a broader, distinctively southern scale of Dharmaśāstra texts that framed the Mitākṣarā/Dāyabhāga divide as a debate between Mīmāṃsā and Navya-Nyāya theories of property. By the close of the seventeenth century, one could speak of two complex, comprehensive schools of Dharmaśāstric thought, inflected by Mīmāṃsā and Navya-Nyāya philosophy, centred around pedagogical networks in Vārāṇasī and Navadvīpa, taking paradigmatically divergent approaches to the problem of inheritance, and emanating from commentarial literature on the Mitākṣarā and Dāyabhāga respectively.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Fleming, Christopher T. „Mīmāṃsā and the Mitākṣarā School of Jurisprudence“. In Ownership and Inheritance in Sanskrit Jurisprudence, 29–71. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852377.003.0002.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This chapter traces the development of the concept of ownership in Sanskrit hermeneutical (Mīṃāṃsā) and jurisprudential (Dharmaśāstra) texts from approximately the first millennium CE to approximately the fifteenth century CE. The chapter draws attention to two linked trends in Indian jurisprudential history: (1) the development of a philosophical concept of ownership that occurred in the Sanskrit hermeneutical tradition centuries before the earliest logicians (Naiyāyikas); and (2) the recalibration and redeployment of several arguments concerning this Mīmāṃsā-derived concept by medieval Dharmaśāstra commentators who self-consciously framed their approaches to the jurisprudence of inheritance as further refinements of Vijñāneśvara’s Ṛjumitākṣarā (eleventh to twelfth centuries CE). The core legal and philosophical ideas analyzed are ownership-by-birth (janmasvatva) and ownership as an extra-śāstric (laukika) phenomenon respectively.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Fleming, Christopher T. „Navya-Nyāya and the Maithila and Gauḍa Schools of Jurisprudence“. In Ownership and Inheritance in Sanskrit Jurisprudence, 72–114. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852377.003.0003.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This chapter examines two schools of Jurisprudence that emerged in eastern India between the fourteenth and the sixteenth centuries CE: that of Mithilā (Maithila/Miśra) and Bengal (Gauḍa). These schools of jurisprudence, in contrast to the school of thought that developed around Vijñāneśvara’s Ṛjumitākṣarā, were neither strictly academic nor pan-Indian. Rather, they were deeply regional (in interest, influence, and self-identification), isolated almost completely from Vijñāneśvara’s Mitākṣarā and its Mīmāṃsā-derived theories of ownership, highly competitive (particularly in Bengal), and influenced by Navya-Nyāya philosophical debates about ownership. The core legal and philosophical ideas analysed are ownership-by-the-death-of-the-previous-owner (uparamasvatva) and ownership as a śāstric (śāstraikasamadhigamya) phenomenon respectively.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!