Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Michel de Criticism and interpretation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Michel de Criticism and interpretation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
Vavilov, A. V., und N. S. Sidorenko. „HEGELIANISM UNDER THE NIETZSCHEANISM’S MASK: THE SPECULATIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE FOUCAULT’S “HISTORY OF MADNESS”“. Scientific bulletin of the Southern Institute of Management 1, Nr. 1 (30.03.2016): 83–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.31775/2305-3100-2016-1-83-87.
Sidorenko, N. S., und A. V. Vavilov. „HEGELIANISM UNDER THE NIETZSCHEANISM’S MASK: THE SPECULATIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE FOUCAULT’S “HISTORY OF MADNESS”“. Scientific bulletin of the Southern Institute of Management, Nr. 2 (30.06.2016): 69–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.31775/2305-3100-2016-2-69-73.
Armstrong, Chris. „Philosophical Interpretation in the Work of Michael Walzer“. Politics 20, Nr. 2 (Mai 2000): 87–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00116.
Wartenberg, Thomas. „Film as Argument“. Film Studies 8, Nr. 1 (2006): 126–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/fs.8.13.
Vasileva, Olga A. „Michel Butor’s “Improvisations sur Rimbaud”: interpretation of the poet’s works and language“. Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education, Nr. 1 (Januar 2021): 44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.20339/phs.1-21.044.
Jacobs, Andrew S. „"Solomon's Salacious Song": Foucault's Author Function and the Early Christian Interpretation of the Canticum Canticorum“. Medieval Encounters 4, Nr. 1 (1998): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006798x00016.
Małecki, Wojciech. „“If happiness is not the aim of politics, then what is?”: Rorty versus Foucault“. Foucault Studies, Nr. 11 (01.02.2011): 106. http://dx.doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i11.3209.
Gada, Muhammad Yaseen. „Raymond Farrin – Structure and Quranic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy text“. ICR Journal 9, Nr. 1 (15.01.2018): 128–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.52282/icr.v9i1.151.
Kubok, Dariusz. „Kant and Zetetic Scepticism“. Ruch Filozoficzny 78, Nr. 3 (05.12.2022): 7–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/rf.2022.020.
Rodin, Kirill. „Witgenstein on intention and theory of action“. RL. 2020. vol.1. no. 2 1, RL. 2020. vol.1. no. 2 (10.12.2020): 88–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.47850/rl.2020.1.2.88-94.
Moberly, R. W. L. „Christ in All the Scriptures? The Challenge of Reading the Old Testament as Christian Scripture“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 1, Nr. 1 (2007): 79–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421379.
Moberly, R. W. L. „Christ in All the Scriptures? The Challenge of Reading the Old Testament as Christian Scripture“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 1, Nr. 1 (2007): 79–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.1.1.0079.
Rentschler, Eric. „A Certain Tendency in German Film Criticism of the Postwall Era“. New German Critique 47, Nr. 3 (01.11.2020): 33–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-8607563.
Mansilla Torres, Katherine. „Isla de cenizas. Crítica social de la injusticia“. Sílex 9, Nr. 1 (01.07.2019): 153–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.53870/silex.20199144.
Mansilla Torres, Katherine. „Isla de cenizas. Crítica social de la injusticia“. Sílex 9, Nr. 1 (01.07.2019): 153–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.53870/uarm2019.n144.
Fennell, Jon. „A Polanyian Perspective on C.S. Lewis’s The Abolition of Man“. Journal of Inklings Studies 4, Nr. 1 (April 2014): 93–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/ink.2014.4.1.5.
Porret, Michel. „L'etica e le domande dello storico: Bronislaw Baczko“. HISTORIA MAGISTRA, Nr. 2 (November 2009): 108–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/hm2009-002010.
B.H., Kushka. „INTERTEXTUALITY AS A FACTOR OF THE GENRE SPECIFICITY OF MICHEL TOURNIE’S NOVELS“. South archive (philological sciences), Nr. 85 (12.04.2021): 62–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.32999/ksu2663-2691/2021-85-9.
Langlands, Rebecca. „Latin Literature“. Greece and Rome 64, Nr. 2 (Oktober 2017): 188–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0017383517000092.
Dwyer, Macdara. „Sir Isaac Newton’s enlightened chronologyand inter-denominational discoursein eighteenth-century Ireland“. Irish Historical Studies 39, Nr. 154 (November 2014): 210–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021121400019064.
Manning, Susan. „Industry and Idleness in Colonial Virginia: A New Approach to William Byrd II“. Journal of American Studies 28, Nr. 2 (August 1994): 169–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021875800025445.
Korostichenko, Ekaterina I. „Ethics outside of morals: Modern German humanism“. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies 37, Nr. 4 (2021): 607–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.403.
Tretyak, A. R. „Class Project of Multitude“. Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia 4, Nr. 99 (12.12.2020): 35–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2020-99-4-35-52.
Elam, Michele. „On Twentieth-Century Literature’s Andrew J. Kappel Prize in Literary Criticism, 2019“. Twentieth-Century Literature 65, Nr. 3 (01.09.2019): 187–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-7852042.
Zaret, David, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Contemporary Sociology 17, Nr. 1 (Januar 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.
Senchuk, Dennis M., und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism.“ Noûs 26, Nr. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.
Gorski, Philip S. „SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM“. Zygon� 25, Nr. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.
Rosen, Bernard. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.
Rosen, Bernard, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.
Stahl, A. „Michel parameters averages and interpretation“. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 76, Nr. 1-3 (April 1999): 173–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5632(99)00454-5.
Saunders, Ben. „Recent Critics of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism“. Philosophy 91, Nr. 4 (09.09.2016): 503–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031819116000437.
Ware, Tracy. „Historicism Along and Against the Grain: The Case of Wordsworth's "Michael"“. Nineteenth-Century Literature 49, Nr. 3 (01.12.1994): 360–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2933821.
Green, Joel B. „Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, Nr. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421422.
Green, Joel B. „Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, Nr. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.5.2.0159.
Morrow, Jeffrey L. „The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’“. New Blackfriars 91, Nr. 1035 (12.08.2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.
Rosenberg, Ruth, und Jerome J. McGann. „Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation“. South Central Review 3, Nr. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.
Luty, Damian. „Koncepcja niezmienników interpretacyjnych Michała Hellera a zagadnienie wielości sformułowań teorii naukowych“. Idea. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych 30, Nr. 1 (2018): 40–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/idea.2018.30.1.03.
Meranze, Michael. „Michel Foucault, the Enlightenment, and the Context of Criticism“. American Journal of Semiotics 12, Nr. 1 (1995): 311–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ajs1995121/417.
Lynne Huffer. „The Persistence of Unreason: Michel Foucault's Mad Melodrama“. Criticism 55, Nr. 4 (2013): 637. http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/criticism.55.4.0637.
SUTCH, PETER. „International justice and the reform of global governance: a reconsideration of Michael Walzer's international political theory“. Review of International Studies 35, Nr. 3 (Juli 2009): 513–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210509008638.
Davies, Paul, Greta Gaard und Patrick D. Murphy. „Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy“. Modern Language Review 95, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2000): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3736723.
Woodward, Michael. „Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation“. Theological Librarianship 2, Nr. 1 (27.04.2009): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31046/tl.v2i1.74.
Robbins, Vernon K. „New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Rhetorica 3, Nr. 2 (1985): 145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.2.145.
Fowler, Robert M., und George A. Kennedy. „New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Journal of Biblical Literature 105, Nr. 2 (Juni 1986): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3260415.
Slater, Niall W. „‘Against Interpretation’: Petronius and art Criticism“. Ramus 16, Nr. 1-2 (1987): 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00003295.
Herbert, T. Walter, Roberta Rubenstein und Amy Schrager Lang. „Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Interpretation“. American Quarterly 39, Nr. 4 (1987): 656. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2713134.
Evans, R. L. S., und George A. Kennedy. „New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Classical World 80, Nr. 3 (1987): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350026.
Arutynyan, J. I. „Contemporary art criticism: judgment and interpretation“. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, Nr. 1 (30) (März 2017): 177–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2020-3-177-180.
Perry, John Oliver, und G. N. Devy. „Indian Literary Criticism: Theory and Interpretation“. World Literature Today 77, Nr. 1 (2003): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40157830.
Dietrich, Richard S. „Book Review: Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 42, Nr. 3 (Juli 1988): 310–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438804200315.